Story of Civilization ~ Will & Ariel Durant ~ Volume II, Part 4 ~ Nonfiction
jane
March 23, 2003 - 03:11 pm


What are our origins? Where are we now? Where are we headed?

Share your thoughts with us!





  
"I want to know what were the steps by which man passed from barbarism to civilization." (Voltaire)





Volume Two ("The Life of Greece")

"Four elements constitute Civilization -- economic provision, political organization, moral traditions, and the pursuit of knowledge and the arts. "

"I shall proceed as rapidly as time and circumstances will permit, hoping that a few of my contemporaries will care to grow old with me while learning. "

"These volumes may help some of our children to understand and enjoy the infinite riches of their inheritance."

"Civilization begins where chaos and insecurity ends." "








THE DIONYSIAN THEATER







"It was on the Dionysian stage that the major tragedies and comedies were first played."

"The chorus is in many ways the most important as well as the most costly part of the spectacle."

"In both tragedy and comedy the actor wears a mask, fitted with a resonant mouthpiece of brass."

"The audience is as interesting as the play."





In this Discussion Group we are not examining Durant. We are examining Civilization but in the process constantly referring to Durant's appraisals.

Will Durant attacks in this volume the absorbing, perennially fascinating problem of Greek civilization. Dr. Durant tells the whole story of Hellas, from the days of Crete's vast Aegean empire to the extirpation of the last remnants of Greek liberty, crushed under the heel of an implacably forward-marching Rome. This is a preeminently vivid re-creation of Greek culture brought to the reader through the medium of a supple and vigorous prose.

Like a great drama, The Life of Greece finds a climax in fifth-century Athens, and Will Durant's picture of the city of Pericles is a masterpiece of synthesis, compressing into about two hundred pages the high spots and eternal significances of what many have considered the most fruitful epoch in history. The Life of Greece has taken its place as the most brilliant story of a magnificently endowed people whose career ended in tragedy and unwanted assimilation because they discovered a world view too late.

This volume, and the series of which it is a part, has been compared with the great work of the French encyclopedists of the eighteenth century. The Story of Civilization represents the most comprehensive attempt in our times to embrace the vast panorama of man's history and culture.

This, then, is about YOU. Join our group daily and listen to what Durant and the rest of us are saying. Better yet, share with us your opinions.



Your Discussion Leader:

Robby Iadeluca





Story of Civilization, Vol II, Part 1
Story of Civilization, Vol. II, Part 2
Story of Civilization, Vol. II, Part 3
Books main page | B&N Bookstore |


Internet Citation Procedure



jane
March 23, 2003 - 03:12 pm
Remember to subscribe!

Bubble
March 23, 2003 - 11:33 pm
Hello Jane DeNeve!
Thanks for the new discussion room.
Of course I have subscribe, I would never want to lose even one comment!
Bubble

Hats
March 24, 2003 - 01:28 am
Tooki,

I enjoyed the Amazon reviews of 'Homer Lives.' Very interesting. Thanks.

Hats
March 24, 2003 - 01:30 am
Hi Sea Bubble and Jane,

I would like to say thanks for the new discussion room too. Thanks, Jane.

Malryn (Mal)
March 24, 2003 - 06:33 am
"The maintenance of the army and the navy constitutes the chief expenditure of the state."
This is the one of the quotes Robby posted above. In the year 2001 the United States budgeted 3% for education, 2% for nutrition, 2% for housing, and 33% for military expenditures. It is the largest expense this country has.

Mal

tooki
March 24, 2003 - 06:50 am
Where are we? I don't want to move ahead. Mal, I don't locate that quote. HELP! Or shall we move on as Robby is incogniteo, so to speak. I have us at the 2nd paragraph, p.164.

Malryn (Mal)
March 24, 2003 - 07:01 am
The quote in my post is one of those in green which Robby posted at the top of this page, Tooki.

Mal

Hats
March 24, 2003 - 08:59 am
I don't have the book. I just read the green posts put up by Robby. I think the book would be too technical or maybe boring. I like the tidbits Robby gives us.

tooki
March 24, 2003 - 09:19 am
That is, of course, just what you said, Mal, "above." I took it metaphorically, i.e., from a passage quoted by Robby, not literally. I believe I'll stop looking for it now.

A review of the numbers of Greeks involved in the administeration of the city indicates large numbers of "inexperts" governing the city. As the Durants said, "Athens does not believe in government by experts.

Does the involvement of all these citizens in governing explain anything about the great loyalty and love that Athenians had for their cities? It is my understanding, at this point, that Greek patriotisim began and ended with their feelings about their cities.

Malryn (Mal)
March 24, 2003 - 06:15 pm
Tooki, the quote I posted this morning from Robby's quotes in green above is on Page 265 of the hard cover book, published in 1939 by Simon and Schuster. Robby posts those quotes for us to use as a springboard for discussion. Shall we talk about them during the time Robby has computer problems?

Tooki, you mentioned that "Greek patriotism began and ended with their feelings about their cities." Ancient Greece was comprised of city-states, each different and separate from each other, as far as I can tell. I'm going to try and find a link I posted earlier, so we can perhaps examine some of the differences.

Mal

Malryn (Mal)
March 24, 2003 - 06:18 pm

Daily Life in Ancient Greece. Scroll down to read about some City-States

tooki
March 24, 2003 - 10:05 pm
Each town, as described in that charming site, had an individual character. Their behavior at the Olympic games was based on this.

Spartans feel superior. Athenians know they are the shining stars. Corinthians are proud. Argivians are hard workers. Megarians are proud of their achievements.

I suggest that these basic traits correspond to geography: mountain, plain or water. The city-states are described somewhat in terms of their geography in the site's brief account.

As I mentioned in an earlier post, such differences in geography evoke different reactions in the folks living there. Such differences probably became excerbated as time passed.

Justin
March 24, 2003 - 10:57 pm
I wonder what the relationship is between high expenditures for military and the tendency to make war.

Wars may be caused by agressive behavior or defensive behavior. A strong military discourages attack by others thereby reducing the incidence of wars of defense. Wars of agression are some thing else. One may be inclined to attack for a variety of purposes. There is the Bush preemptive strike. There is the territorial aggrandizement vis a vis Hitler, the Kaiser, and Saddam against Kuwait. The inclination to attack is made easier by the presence of a strong military.

Hats
March 24, 2003 - 11:34 pm
Mal,

Thanks for the new link about Greece. I never quite understood the meaning of city-states. Your definition was easy enough. Now, back to the link to read more.

Hats
March 24, 2003 - 11:43 pm
How many city-states were there?

Malryn (Mal)
March 25, 2003 - 07:29 am
Hats, here is more about city-states in Ancient Greece. Click the name of the city-state at the bottom of each page to read information about each one.

ANCIENT GREECE, City-States

tooki
March 25, 2003 - 08:23 am
Justin's "Inclination to attack is made easier by the presence of a strong military," is sound. Another factor might be the "appetite for conquest of large-scale territorial states." (From my current reading, "Memory and the Mediterranean.")

Large-scale territorial states seem to be unable to avoid flexing their muscles. It's not enough to the top dog. Everyone else must like you, be like you, or suffer the consequences. Exception? Persia? Sorry, we're talking about small city-state, aren't we.

Hat: ALL the cities in Greece were "city-states." There was no central government in ancient Greece, like Washington, D.C. here.

Malryn (Mal)
March 25, 2003 - 09:18 am
Durant says on Page 203:
". . . . the Greeks considred themselves to be all of one race, but their tribal differences -- Aeolian, Ionian, Achaean, Dorian -- were keenly felt, and Athens and Sparta disliked each other with an ethnological virulence worthy of our own age. Differences of religion strengthened, as they were strengthtened by, political divisions. Out of the unique cults of locality and clam came distinct festivals and calendars, distinct customs and laws, distinct tribunals, even frontiers; for the boundary stones limited the realm of the god as well as of the community; cujus regio, ejus religio. These and many other factors united to produce the Greek city-state."
Durant also says on Page 204:
"Aristotle conceived the state as an association of freemen acknowledging one government and capable of meeting in one assembly; a state with more than ten thousand citizens, he thought, would be impracticable. In the Greek language one word -- polis -- sufficed for both city and state."

Hats
March 25, 2003 - 10:09 am
Mal, thanks for the link. I am beginning to want the book. I will look into getting a copy.

Tooki, thanks for your information.

Malryn (Mal)
March 25, 2003 - 03:00 pm
Was the lack of a strong central government in Ancient Greece part of the reason for its collapse? Can a democracy survive without a strong central government?

Mal

tooki
March 25, 2003 - 04:51 pm
but few are chosen. Without peeking ahead to the Durants' chapter, "The Suicide of Greece," I wager that Greece fell because it never came up with a world view that united all the city states. Without being united (a strong central government?) it fell to pieces and was devoured.

I think no form of government can survice without some sort of centralized government. As Truman said, "The buck stops here."

I accept the Durants' reasons for city states, along with geographic ones. Here are other explanations: (still from "Memories and the Med.")

"Ancient Greek cities would not have seen the light of day if it had not been for the recession of the twelfth century B. C. They grew up during the dark ages following the Dorian invasion, since what has collapsed with the end of Mycenaean civilization was the palace-centered state, with its mighty rulers and their all-powerful scribes."

Hats
March 26, 2003 - 12:02 am
Can the City States be likened to the Thirteen Colonies? Each colony had its own unique values.

Malryn (Mal)
March 26, 2003 - 07:22 am
Hats, the thirteen colonies were ruled by England, and had to obey its laws and answer to that country, so they were not really like the City-States in Ancient Greece which were only responsible to and for themselves.

As far as I remember, Robby put the quotes in green on this page after he told us he was having serious trouble with his computer. I think perhaps we should talk about them. I'm going to investigate how election by archons was replaced by lot, and will be back with some information about that.

Mal

Malryn (Mal)
March 26, 2003 - 08:44 am
At the risk of offending all of you, and since Robby is not here to do it, I am going to post what follows Durant's fine dicussion about archons in Life of Greece.
"More importance is attached to military than to civil office. The ten strategoi, or commanders, though they too are appointed for a year only, and are at all times subject to examination and recall, are chosen not by lot but by open election in the Assembly. Here ability, not popularity, is the road to preferment; and the ekklesia of the fourth century shows its good sense by choosing Phocion general forty-five times, despite the fact that he is the most unpopular man in Athens and makes no secret of his scorn for the crowd. The functions of the strategoi expand with the growth of international relations, so that in the later fifth century they not only manage the army and the navy, but conduct negotiations with foreign states, and control the revenues and expenditures of the city. The commander in chief, or strategos autokrator, is therefore the most powerful man in the government; and since he may be re-elected year after year, he can give to the state a continuity of purpose which its constitution might otherwise render impossible. Through this office Pericles makes Athens for a generation a democratic monarchy, so that Thucydides can say of the Athenian polity that though it is a democracy in name it is really government by the greatest of the citizens."

tooki
March 26, 2003 - 02:27 pm
Thanks, Mal, for going forward. I was going to suggest you do it.

I had been wondering how and why Pericles was able to run things as long as he did. This, then is the explnation, and during his sojourn Athens was "a democratic monarchy" for a generation. Do we know of any other historical democratic monarchies?

Mal, in honor of your assumption of duties I am sending you a present via e-mail. I hope it tickles your fancy.

Malryn (Mal)
March 26, 2003 - 03:57 pm
Thanks for the present, Pauline. That was fun! I'm not assuming any duties here, but I truly don't want this discussion to stall while our facilitator must be offline.

Mal

tooki
March 26, 2003 - 10:35 pm
The Durants were being metaphorical when they said that "Pericles makes Athens for a generation a democratic monarchy." Pericles was an elected official, but he governed like a monarch.

After reviewing a number of mind-numbing articles on different definitions of democracy, all of which began in 4th century Greece, but none of which discussed monarchy, I found the one below. Although it is only tangentially related, I think the political distinctions it makes are worthwhile.

Kings By Any Other Name

At least scroll down and read the headings. Some of the statistics are interesting.

Hats
March 27, 2003 - 03:53 am
Mal, I understand it. That leaves me with the word archon. Someone give me a simple definition.

Malryn (Mal)
March 27, 2003 - 08:00 am
Quoted from Life of Greece Page 109.
"After King Codrus had died in heroic self-sacrifice against the invading Dorians, they announced (so the story went) that no one was good enough to succeed him, and replaced the king with an archon chosen for life. In 752 they limited the tenure of the archonship to ten years, and in 683 to one. On the latter occasion they divided the powers of the office among nine archons; an archon eponymos, who gave his name to the year as a means of dating events; an archon basileus, who bore the name of king but was merely head of the state religion; a polemarchos or military commander; and six thesmthetai, or lawmakers. As in Sparta and Rome, so in Athens the overthrow of the monarchy represented not a victory for the commons, or any intentional advance towards democracy, but a recapture of mastery by a feudal aristocracy -- one more swing of the pendulum in the historical alternation between localized and centralized authority. By this piecemeal revolution the royal office was shorn of all its powers, and its holder was confined to the functions of a priest. The word king remained in the Athenian constitution to the end of its ancient history, but the reality was never restored. Institutions may with impunity be altered or destroyed from above if their names are left unchanged."
The rôle of archon changed with the advent of Solon and the beginning of democracy, as I understand it.

Hats
March 27, 2003 - 10:54 am
Talking about the overthrow of monarchy, makes me wonder what would happen if the monarchy in Britain were overthrown. You know, there has been talk about that for years.

Justin
March 27, 2003 - 12:45 pm
Hats; Nothing significant would happen. The government would continue to function just as it has for years. Some little face saving ceremonies would be discontinued. That's all. Britain would save itself the expense of the monarchy and the media would find a new social topic to talk write and talk about. What would happen if the US discontinued the Motion Pictures Academy Awards?

Justin
March 27, 2003 - 12:48 pm
Has anyone had notice from Robby, lately? Any progress reports?

Hats
March 27, 2003 - 01:07 pm
Justin, I am a sucker for all those ceremonies, gilded coaches, coronations, court gossip. What a loss!!

Malryn (Mal)
March 27, 2003 - 04:00 pm
All of those gilded coaches and pomp and circumstance cost the British taxpayer a great deal of money. The queen is one of the richest women in the world. (3.11 billion Euros. 1.95 billion pounds.) It was in 1996 she agreed to pay income tax. No English monarch had paid such taxes since 1936. There are all of these factors, but the majority of British citizens do not want to do away with the monarchy there. They love their queen.

Of course, the pomp and circumstance we have in the U.S. costs the American taxpayer a good deal of money, too!

I've had no word from Robby since he last posted here. I think we should keep on as we have been until he is able to come back online, don't you?

Mal

Hats
March 27, 2003 - 04:19 pm
Our pomp and circumstance is nothing like the British pomp. Anyway, I have heard that Queen Elizabeth has nothing to do with making of laws. Is the throne just a figurehead government?

Mal, I can't find my way back to Greece. Can you lead this back to Grecian Administration?

Hats
March 27, 2003 - 04:34 pm
We Want Robby! We Want Robby! We Want Robby!

Hurry back, Robby!!

Malryn (Mal)
March 27, 2003 - 04:58 pm
"The army is identical with the electorate; every citizen must serve, and is subject, until the age of sixty, to conscription in any war. But Athenian life is not militarized; after a period of youthful training there is little of martial drill, no strutting of uniforms, no interference of soldiery with the civilian population. In active service the army consists of light-armed infantry, chiefly the poorer citizens, carrying slings or spears, the heavy-armed infantry, or hoplites, those properous citizens who can afford armor, shield, and javelin, and the cavalry of rich men, clad in armor and helmet, and equipped with lance and sword. The Greeks excel the Asiatics in military discipline, and perhaps owe their achievements to a striking combination of loyal obedience on the battlefield with vigorous independence in civil affairs. Nevertheless there is no science of war among them, no definite principles of tactics on strategy, before Epimondas and Philip. Cities are usually walled, and defense is -- among the Greeks as among ourselves -- more effective than offense, otherwise man might have no civilization to record. Siege armies bring up great beams suspended by chains, and, drawing the beams back, drive them forward against the wall; this is as far as siege machinery develops before Archimedes. As for the navy, it is kept up by choosing, each year, four hundred trierarchs, rich men whose privilege it is to recruit a crew, equip a trireme with materials supplied by the state, pay for its building and launching, and keep it in repair; in this way Athens supports in peacetime a fleet of some sixty ships."
Do you see any resemblance between this and the present military system in the United States? Is it true that our defense is more effective than our offense, as Durant states?

Hats
March 27, 2003 - 06:36 pm
Mal, you are not a poor substitute. You're a perfect substitute. I wanted Robby to know how much we miss him. If he can't be here, you are the perfect moderator.

Justin
March 27, 2003 - 09:23 pm
The US defense was never very strong. The military prior to WW2 was a very weak cadre. We always assumed that the oceans separating us from aggressive countries was protection enough. Since WW11, our defensive posture has been stronger but we failed to carry the star wars program. There are several countries in the world which now depend on us to protect them from aggressors thus forcing us to maintain a strong defensive posture.

Mal, you are doing fine. Stay the course.

Justin
March 27, 2003 - 09:27 pm
Hats: the British monarchy has not had the power to make laws for quite some time. A few of those royal folk lost their heads in prior attempts at law making. Today, the role of the monarchy is strictly ceremonial.

Hats
March 28, 2003 - 12:24 am
In Greece, the cut off age for conscription was sixty. In the United States, the military no longer takes you after what age?

This war in Iraq is costing a great deal of money. I think the figure is in the billions. Did Greece go broke paying for wars?

Ginny
March 28, 2003 - 06:09 am
I think it's a wonderful thing, in the absence of our Books Discussion Leader, Robby, for all of you participants here, to pick up the thread and continue on. I know he will appreciate it, he's very proud of this group.

Good job!

ginny

tooki
March 28, 2003 - 07:31 am
Isn't there an old saying, "The best offense is a good defense?" Or, was it the other way around? "The best defense is a good offense." Or was it all about football, not civilization?

Justin observed awhile back that perhaps America's military expenditures had something to do with its defense posture. I wonder that a country with strong defenses may be tempted to use them to see if they really work!

I see no reason to make the jump of reasoning that the Durants'make about the connection between battlefield obedience and civil independence. I look for deeper explanations than that, even though they do say, "perhaps."

tooki
March 28, 2003 - 09:07 am
Maintaining a "phalanx" in the face of violent opposition seems like strategic warfare to me, not "loyal obedience." The article below becomes repetitive toward the end, but the beginning description and pictures are noteworthy. These were such brave men.

A Phalanx Too Frequent

We've discussed the Hoplites before, briefly. If we've already seen this, I missed it!

Malryn (Mal)
March 28, 2003 - 09:50 am
"The Greeks excel the Asiatics in military discipline, and perhaps owe their achievements to a striking combination of loyal obedience on the battlefield with vigorous independence in civil affairs."
When Durant says achievements here, I believe he is not just referring to military achievements, but to governmental, artistic and scientific and other achievements. Greeks in the military were obedient to a strategoi like Phocion and Pericles. These leaders were excellent military strategists. Pericles was a great civic leader as well, a leader who encouraged civil independence and democracy.

Malryn (Mal)
March 28, 2003 - 10:07 am

GINNY, thanks for taking the time to drop by and encourage us. There are a lot us who are devoted to this discussion and to Robby's leadership, many of whom do not post too often but come in once in a while to say how much they're learning from what is posted here. We're not about to let the Story of Civilization discussion stop until we come to the end of the books (or us!) with or without the fine aid of our discussion leader.

Mal

robert b. iadeluca
March 28, 2003 - 06:52 pm
SURPRISE!!!

Look who's back! It's been a rough week for me without all you folks but I was absolutely positive that you would all continue. I would worry about a discussion group that fell apart because it was all centered about one person. I've said many times and I contine to say it that the forum could continue without its DL (and you all proved it) but a DL would be absolutely nothing without participants. Thank you very very much, Mal, for continuing on with some of Durant's words. His words are what makes this discussion group a living thing plus, of course, the comments of all you folks.

You would never in a month of Sundays guess what what was wrong. I don't know all the technical details but my computer guru tells me that there was a foul-up of the software which is connected to the mouse. He had the tower in his shop almost all week. The mouse would leave "mouse trails" -- you know a series of arrows instead of just one arrow -- and then everything would fall apart, ultimating causing the computer to shut down. I live in a small community where we all know each other and while I was seeing patients at my office, I gave him permission to take the tower back to my house and to enter it without my being there. When I came in the front door about a half hour ago, I heard Dvorak's New World Symphony playing. I came upstairs. He was gone but the computer was on and my CD playing. What a WELCOME!

So now I will get back to my DL chores if you will be patient for a hour or so.

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
March 28, 2003 - 07:08 pm
Let us finish this section on "Administration" and then move on.

"Every government is imperfect, irksome, and mortal. We have no reason to believe that monarchy or aristocracy would govern Athens better, or longer preserve it, and perhaps only this chaotic democracy can release the energy that will lift Athens to one of the peaks of history.

"Never before or since has political life, within the circle of citizenship, been so intense or so creative. This corrupt and incompetent democracy is at least a school. The voter in the Assembly listens to the cleverest men in Athens. The juror in the courts has his wits sharpened by the taking and sifting of evidence. The holder of office is molded by executive responsibility and experience into a deeper maturity of understanding and judgment.

"Says Simonides, 'The city is the teacher of the man.' For these reasons, it may be, the Athenians can appreciate, and thereby call into existence, Aeschylus and Euripides, Socrates and Plato. The Audience at the theater has been formed in the Assembly and the courts, and is ready to receive the best.

"This aristocratic democracy is no laissez-faire state, no mere watchman of property and order. It finances the Greek drama, and builds the Parthenon. It makes itself responsible for the welfare and development of its peoole, and opens up to them the opportunity ou monon tou zen, all tou eu zen -- 'not only to live, but to live well.'

"History can afford to forgive it all its sins."

"The city is the teacher of the man."

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
March 28, 2003 - 08:08 pm

Welcome home, Robby!!

Justin
March 28, 2003 - 10:34 pm
It's so nice to have you back where you belong, Robby.

Justin
March 28, 2003 - 10:52 pm
Democracy is an imperfect form of government. It is slow to react in emergencies. Debate is essential before action therefore action is often delayed when a quick response is needed. Also intergovernmental activity is hampered by the democratic process. Assembly confirmation is required for diplomatic action so diplomatic commitments are not commitments at all.

I had not thought of it before but the UN is an experiment in democracy. The UN is a world democratic republic. In that capacity, it considered the problem of Iraq and chose to debate while action was required.

Hats
March 29, 2003 - 03:21 am
Welcome back, Robby!!

The United Nations is an experiment, but one that is needed. Without its limited contributions, I feel the whole world would go to war. We need the United Nations. It is the one place where different nations come together under one roof to settle their differences without a gun fight opening up.

robert b. iadeluca
March 29, 2003 - 08:10 am
I call everyone's attention to the BROWN quote in the Heading which begins "Four elements . . ." Those participants here who have been with us since the start of civilization in Our Oriental Heritage already know this but newcomers should be aware that Durant examines each civilization in a specific orderly manner as indicated in that quote. He is therefore about to examine the first element -- Economic -- or what he in this case is calling

Work and Wealth in Athens

Let us then hear what Durant has to say on this topic.

Note also the new GREEN quotes in the Heading.

Éloïse De Pelteau
March 29, 2003 - 08:13 am
Justin, Acting upon impulses can also have adverse effects in explosive situations. Inaction is not a solution either, and while debating the situation can get worse. I think that there is a middle ground where debating an issue diffuses the anger and a wiser decision can be made. There is no perfect way and sometimes it is better to choose the lesser of two evils.

People have criticized the UN for their inaction, but it is still standing. Just the fact that the UN building is in the United States is a statement in itself. Every nation is equal and should be able to express their country's sentiment on an issue without being ostracized. The UN is the essence of democracy with all the faults and qualities.

If a lack of consensus results in inaction in a grave situation it can/will have serious repercussions on future diplomacy and trade between opposite sides of the issue.

Eloïse

moxiect
March 29, 2003 - 08:16 am


Welcome Back Robby! Glad the cat caught the mouse! Yes, I am still here and learning!

robert b. iadeluca
March 29, 2003 - 08:21 am
"Some men can govern states -- seek truth -- make music -- carve statues -- paint pictures -- write books -- teach children -- or serve the gods because others toil to grow food -- weave clothing -- build dwellings -- mine the earth -- make useful things -- transport goods -- exchange them -- or finance their production or their movement.

"Everywhere this is the foundation."

I had an uncle who in his lifetime was an elevator operator, a ship loader during the war, and later a bus driver. I hold a doctorate and he never graduated high school. I may have an education but, in many ways, he was much wiser than I. He had "street smarts." He and others in my family who worked with their hands helped me to increase the use of my brain.

I may not in the course of my daily activities think on a conscious level of awareness that men and women like these are the "base of democracy" but I guess a little humility is required.

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
March 29, 2003 - 09:05 am
Below is a link to an essay called Humility, which is appearing in the current issue of Sonata magazine for the arts.

Humility by Dr. Robert Bancker Iadeluca

Malryn (Mal)
March 29, 2003 - 09:57 am
In Post #41, Hats asked: "Did Greece go broke paying for wars?" Durant tell us on Pages 265 and 266:
"Excluding such gifts and levies, the total internal revenue of Athens in the time of Pericles amounts to some four hundred talents ($2,400,000) a year; to which is added six hundred talents from subjects and allies. This income is spent without any budget, or advance estimate and allocation of funds. Under Pericles' thrifty management, and despite his unprecedented expenditures, the treasury shows a growing surplus, which in 440 stands at 9700 talents ($58,200,000); a pretty sum for any city in any age, and quite extraordinary in Greece, where few states -- in the Peloponnesus none -- have any surplus at all."

Hats
March 29, 2003 - 11:42 am
Thanks, Mal.

I am finding the food situation interesting. In the heading, I read that the Greeks only ate two meals a day. Were these meals full of calories? Of what did their diet consist?

Justin
March 29, 2003 - 12:26 pm
Imagine living on a diet of cereals, grapes, figs and olives. No wonder the sculptural works we have seen are of slender folks. Is there any delicious fat in this nutricious diet, Hats?

Justin
March 29, 2003 - 01:10 pm
Private ownership of the land by small entrepreneurial farmers makes it possible for city dwellers to write books, philosophize, sculpt, wear clothes, amd govern. Athenian food production however, is scant. It barely supports the army in the field and the city dweller in his many pursuits. Food must be imported into Athens for the country to prosper. Much of it comes, I think, from Egypt by sea transport. Some food must come from Asia Minor. But What? Probably grains are shipable.

Tejas
March 29, 2003 - 01:56 pm
I haven't posted in quite a while. For one thing, I still haven't been able to find a copy of the series. I will keep looking.

LouiseJEvans
March 29, 2003 - 02:09 pm
Justin, if they had Olives they had olive oil - considered on of the best fat for humans. Of course you may not consider olive oil delicious. It does take getting used to. I have heard that the Mediterranean diet is one of the most healthful for us.

robert b. iadeluca
March 29, 2003 - 02:18 pm
In the meantime, Tejas, keep your eye on the GREEN quotes in the Heading and you will know exactly where we are in the book.

Nice to hear from you, Louise.

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
March 29, 2003 - 02:25 pm
"In Attica the peasant has at least the franchise. Only citizens are permitted to own land, and nearly all peasants own the soil that they till. Clan control of the land has disappeared, and private ownership is solidly established.

"As in modern France and America, this great class of small proprietors is a steadying conservative force in a democracy where the propertyless city dwellers are always driving toward reform. The ancient war between the country and the city -- between those who want high returns for agriculture and low prices for manufactured, and those who want low prices for food and high wages or profits in industry -- is especially conscious and lively in Attica.

"Whereas industry and trade are accounted plebeian and degrading by the Athenian citizen, the pursuits of husbandry are honored as the groundwork of national economy, personal character, and military power. The freemen of the countryside tend to look down upon the denizens of the city as either weakling parasites or degraded slaves."

The country mouse and the city mouse were at it even in those days!

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
March 29, 2003 - 02:30 pm
The FABLE of the Country Mouse and City Mouse.

Robby

Bubble
March 29, 2003 - 02:58 pm
Justin, Olive oil is delicious, healthy fat and travels quite well. Raisins and figs have been dried from antiquity and also travel perfectly. They are both great exports from Turkey or Greece still today. All our dry fruit here comes from Turkey and they are part of the weekly diet. we could well survive here without meat and with such a diet of fruit, bread, olives, onions and maybe sheep or goat cheese! Bubble

robert b. iadeluca
March 29, 2003 - 03:26 pm
For those who don't give a FIG, don't click onto this link.

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
March 29, 2003 - 03:29 pm
Our old friend, POPEYE, tells us why the Greeks are so healthy.

Robby

LouiseJEvans
March 29, 2003 - 03:52 pm
Robby, thanks for those 2 links. I have put them in my favorites. I do believe a vegetarian diet is the healthiest.

Hats
March 29, 2003 - 05:37 pm
Justin, I would not survive long on a two meal diet. I love to snack. I hate figs. I remember my father loved Fig Newtons.

Hats
March 29, 2003 - 05:48 pm
After reading the links, I have a new appreciation for Greece. If I understand correctly, Vitamin E is found in olive oil, and one of the properties of olive oil is the delay of the aging process. Our diet in America seems to tempt the taste buds but not do much for improving our health. Do the Mediterranean countries eat many cheeseburgers and pizzas?

Éloïse De Pelteau
March 29, 2003 - 06:42 pm
Hats, After spending 6 weeks last year in Spain and living with a Spanish family I had a first-hand look at their diet. They do consume lots of olive oil in and on everything, even on bread for breakfast. They eat soup, meat or fish, lots of salads, cooked vegetables, cheese, eggs in soup, fruit, bread. I never had pizza or pasta or hamburgers They never snack, don't eat dessert or butter, don't exercise except for walking. They are very slim and looked fit.

But what they have that most of us don't is exceptional weather and they spend a lot of time outdoors walking to work, to the park every day in the evening or they go out just to be outdoors.

Eloïse

Hats
March 30, 2003 - 12:34 am
Eloise, what a wonderful trip!! Then, to live with a native family makes it more unforgettable. Six weeks is a good bit of time. Did you have trouble with the language?

My husband would love Spain. He loves soups. He is able to take anything and everything out of the refrigerator and make it into a soup. He tries to control his diet because of health reasons. It is hard for him. Spain and Greece seem to have very healthy diets.

I might be wrong, but after looking at Julia Childs for years, I think the French love a lot of butter. She seemed to use a great deal of wine and butter in her cooking. I would love the French diet. I think they eat lots of pastries and breads. When I think of France, I think of bakery shops and sweet smells.

I am beginning to enjoy soups too. I feel that soups are very healthy. I love vegetables. My father loved to go fishing and to fish. Growing up, we ate fish for breakfast, lunch and dinner. At the time, I didn't realize the healthiness of fish. I just got so tired of fried and baked fish. My father believed, if you caught it, you ate it.

I have to admit to loving pizza and Spaghetti and meatballs. I can do without cheeseburgers.

Eloise, did you get a chance to see a bullfight in Spain? When I think of Spain, I think of Ernest Hemmingway and bullfights.

Bubble
March 30, 2003 - 02:11 am
Hats, for as long as I can remember, I ate only two meals a day and only one of them cookedand with at least two vegs; The last twenty years I eat one meal in the middle of the day, but plenty of fluids otherwise. In the evening I nimble on a fruit or have a yoghurt. I don't seem to need more.



Our diet is similar to what Eloise described, but we do eat pasta or rice everyday as a side dish. Pizza is a special treat and not often, same as burgers. Only recently do the young generation start to behave like americans and the big food chains have opened branches here: Mcs and Pizza Hut mainly.



Meals are usually organized from scratch and fresh vegetables from the market used preferably to any from cans or ready cooked. I was stunned in Europe that they sold in shops salads and lettuce already prewashed and cut in bags. Bubble

Hats
March 30, 2003 - 04:50 am
Bubble, are you in the U.S.?

Éloïse De Pelteau
March 30, 2003 - 04:56 am
Hats, at the risk of being reprimended by Robby for getting off the topic, I just want to say that because I object to bullfights, I didn't go. The lady of the house in Spain and I were both talkative, but when her husband was watching us both silent at the dinner table, said to us laughing: "Mucho souffrir?". I did learn a little bit of Spanish but here I can never use it. If the French can spend 4 hours eating, they use the time for conversation sipping wine between 4 or 5 courses. Portions are very small compared to here.

My estimation is that in ancient Greece, their diet was about the same as it is today around the Mediterranean except that they ate less, which is much healthier I think.

Eloïse

robert b. iadeluca
March 30, 2003 - 05:09 am
Well, now that you have made me hungry, can we move on to Ancient Greece and the hardiness of its people due to its climate?

"The soil is poor. Of 630,000 aces in Attica, a third is unsuitable for cultivation. The rest is impoverished by deforestation, meager rainfall, and rapid erosion by winter floods. The peasants of Attica shirk no toil -- for themselves or their handful of slaves -- to remedy this dry humor of the gods. They gather the surplus flow of headwaters into reservoirs -- dike the channels of the streams to control the floods -- reclaim the precious humus of the swamps -- build thousands of irrigation canals to bring to their thirsty fields the trickle of the rivulets -- patiently transplant vegetables to improve their size and quality -- and let the land lie fallow in alternate years to regain its strength.

"They alkalinize the soil with salts like carbonate of lime, and fertilize it with potassium nitrate, ashes, and human waste. The gardens and groves about Athens are enriched with the sewage of the city, brought by a main sewer to a reservoir outside the Dipylon, and led thence by bricklined canals into the valley of the Cephisus River.

"Different soils are mixed to their mutual benefit, and green crops like beans in flower are plowed in to nourish the earth. Plowing, harrowing, sowing, and planting are crowded into the brief days of the fall. The grain harvest comes at the end of May, and the rainless summer is the season of preparation and rest.

"With all this care Attica produces only 675,000 bushels of grain yearly -- hardly enough to supply a quarter of its population. Without imported food Periclean Athens would starve. Hence the urge to imperialism, and the necessity for a powerful fleet."

The grass is always greener on the other side?

Robby

Hats
March 30, 2003 - 05:23 am
Robby, letting the land rest is an idea I have read about in the Bible. I think the Israelites allowed their land to rest for seven years. I have known families who allowed their gardens to rest for a time. These gardeners said that the produce was better after the land had rested.

Bubble
March 30, 2003 - 05:46 am
Yes, In Israel, the religious kibbutzim let the land rest every seven years as is prescribed in the Bible.



Hat, click on my name for details about me!



Robby, can I offer you a fresh pita warm from the taboon, with labane cheese, a sprinkle of Zatar herb on it and drizzle of olive oil? Broken olives on the side.

robert b. iadeluca
March 30, 2003 - 06:43 am
Bubble has been a participant here for many many months. She enriches this forum tremendously despite the fact that terrorists often "do their job" not far from where she lives and yet you would never know it from the items she posts here.

From time to time some of us click onto her name and send her encouraging emails.

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
March 30, 2003 - 10:04 am
"The countryside tries to atone for its parsimonious grain by generous harvests of olives and grapes. Hillsides are terraced and watered, and asses are encouraged to make the vine more fruitful by gnawing off the twigs.

"Olive trees cover many a landscape in Periclean Greece, but it is Peisistratus and Solon who deserve the credit for introducing them. The olive tree takes sixteen years to come to fruit, forty years to reach perfection. Without the subsidies of Peisistratus it might never have grown on Attic soil. The devastation of the olive orchards in the Peloponnesian War will play a part in the decline of Athens. To the Greek the olive has many uses -- one pressing gives oil for eating -- a second, oil for anointing -- a third, oil for illumination -- and the remainder is used as fuel. It becomes Attica's richest crop, so valuable that the state assumes a monopoly of its export, and pays with it and wine for the grain that it must import.

"It forbids altogether the export of figs, for these are a main source of health and energy in Greece. The fig tree grows well even in arid soil. Its spreading roots gather whatever moisture the earth will yield, and its stinted foliage offers scant surface for evaporation.

"Furthermore,the husbandman learns from the East the secret of caprification. He hangs branches of the wild male goat fig (caprificus) among the boughs of the female cultivated tree, and relies upon gall wasps to carry the fertilizing pollen of the male into the fruit of the female, which then bears richer and sweeter figs."

Any comments on the agricultural methods of the Ancient Athenian or perhaps methods of ours which compare?

Robby

Bubble
March 30, 2003 - 12:29 pm
The fig tree also is the symbol of the family, of the fruitfulness of a couple. It needs both male and female trees to bear those deliciously juicy fruit. I am always looking carefully for wasps before picking one!



Thanks Robby. Bubble

tooki
March 30, 2003 - 01:24 pm
The soil is "improverished by deforestation...and erosion." I believe I read that Greece had been deforested very early, say the 10th century. And Athens, in the 4th century, is unable to grow sufficient grain, I assume wheat, to feed its population. These conditions began "the urge to imperialism."

The urge to imperialism began much earlier, I think. That's what the Trojan war was all about. Forget Helen!

The Trojan war had to do with Greece's need to get into the lands around the Black Sea, beyond Troy. Lands that were/are rich in grain. It wasn't about Helen at all. It was about commodities.

robert b. iadeluca
March 30, 2003 - 01:56 pm
This link speaks to DEFORESTATION in Ancient Greece.

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
March 30, 2003 - 02:39 pm
Here is a HISTORY of the Olive Tree.

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
March 30, 2003 - 06:45 pm
"The recorded history of the fig industry begins with its introduction into the Mediterranean outside Asia, and particularly into Greece. Some of the earliest Greek reportings of figs are in mythological literature. According to Greek mythology, Zeus was pursuing Ge and her son, Sykeus, In the war of the Titans when, to save him, she metamorphosed into a fig tree. The ancient city of Sykea is named for this myth. Another Greek myth credits the goddess Demeter (Ceres) as introducing the 'fruit of autumn' to humans. Among the Hellenes, figs were sacred to the libidinous and bibulous god, Dionysius. According to myth he placed a phallus of fig wood on the grave of Polyhymnos as a substitute for a promised favor, which he kept for himself. To this day the phallus carried at Dionysian festivals is carved of fig wood and the fig tree is the tree of phallic worshippers. The use of figs among early Greeks paralleled their rise in the literature: when mention of figs was infrequent in the literature, fresh figs were a luxury of the rich. Later, when references were common, figs had become an important dietary staple, particularly dried figs during winter months.



"It is uncertain when figs were first introduced to Europe. They are hardly mentioned in the Homeric songs (ca. 850 B.C.), the oldest existing European literature. There is no reference to them in the Iliad, the description of the Trojan war waged by the Greeks. However, in the Odyssey, the description of Odysseus' wanderings after the war, figs are mentioned three times; during the agonies of Tantulus in the lower world he tried in vain to reach the fruits almost within his grasp: '...pomegranates, pears, apples, sweet figs and dark olives.' As the Homeric songs were probably composed in the ninth century B.C. these references would be among the earliest. However, later investigations st the verses mentioning figs were interpolations of a later date. The earliest mention of undoubted authenticity is by the seventh-century B.C. Archilochus, who tells of figs being cultivated on the isle of Paros. these few references it can be deduced that figs were introduced Greece in the eighth century B.C., probably from the Semitic nations s from Palestine and Asia Minor. Thereafter, in the seventh century, B.C., Attica and Sikyon, the latter named after syke 'fig' in Greek became famous for their figs. Because they were so highly valued, the in ruler Solon, (639-559 B.C..) decreed against their export, reserving Lise solely for the Greeks. Xerxes, the king of Persia, ate Attican figs to remind him of the desirability of conquering a place that could produce such fine fruit.



"Once introduced fig cultivation quickly spread throughout Greece to become an important article of diet for both rich and poor. The term 'sycophant' has its origins in ancient Greece. Athenians were particularly fond of figs and were nicknamed 'sycophants' (syke or fig-eaters). Later, when members of the same population informed authorities of illegally exporting figs from Attica, the word assumed its modern meaning. From this time on the fig is mentioned frequently in Greek literature."
I love fresh figs; don't much like them dried. This information is from History of the Fig.

robert b. iadeluca
March 30, 2003 - 07:47 pm
Our very own Eloise is the Discussion Leader of a brand-new forum which opens up April 1st (day after tomorrow). It will be all in French and centers around the book "Madame Bovary" by Flaubert. Eloise and Theron have together put together what I consider one of the most attractive and appealing Headings in Senior Net Books & Literature.

Even if you do not speak French and have no intention of subscribing to this discussion group, do yourself a favor and visit the Heading. Take the time to click onto the various Links in the Heading -- examine the map showing the various regions in France, admire the beautiful photos of Paris and other cities and villages, listen to French songs. Click HERE and I promise you -- you will be fascinated.

Robby

tooki
March 30, 2003 - 08:10 pm
Since civilization began, in the manner in which the Durants present civilization, mankind has been despoiling its environment. This site is a devasting indictment of mankind's inability to shepard its resources.

The Myth of Ecological Responsibility Among Early People

Scroll down a bit to find the ecological work of the wonderful Greeks.

robert b. iadeluca
March 30, 2003 - 08:11 pm
"These products of the soil -- cereals, olive oil, figs, grapes, and wine -- are the staples of diet in Attica. Cattle rearing is negligible as a source of food. Horses are bred for racing, sheep for wool, goats for milk, asses, mules, cows, and oxen for transport, but chiefly pigs for food. Bees are kept as providers of honey for a sugarless world.

"Meat is a luxury. The poor have it only on feast days. The heroic banquets of Homeric days have disappeared. Fish is both a commonplace and a delicacy. The poor man buys it salted and dried. The rich man celebrates with fresh shark meat and eels.

"Cereals take the form of porridge, flat loaves, or cakes, often mixed with honey. Bread and cake are seldom baked at home, but are bought from women peddlers or in market stalls. Eggs are added, and vegetables -- particularly beans, peas, cabbage, lentils, lettuce, onions, and garlic.

"Fruits are few. Oranges and lemons are unknown. Nuts are common, and condiments abound. Salt is collected in salt pans from the sea, and is traded in the interior for slaves. A cheap slave is called a 'salting' and a good one is 'worth his salt.'

"Nearly everything is cooked and dressed with olive oil, which makes an excellent substitute for petroleum. Butter is hard to keep in Mediterranean lands, and olive oil takes its place. Honey, sweetmeats, and cheese provide dessert. Cheesecakes are so fancied that many classic treatises are devoted to their esoteric art.

"Water is the usual drink, but everyone has wine, for no civilization has found life tolerable without narcotics or stimulants. Snow and ice are kept in the ground to cool wine in the hot months. Beer is known but scorned in Periclean days."

Your comments, please?

Robby

Justin
March 30, 2003 - 11:33 pm
Tooki, you raise a damn good postulate. If there were a Trojan war, it was certainly not about Helen. The war must have had an economic cause. What is known of the Trojan War is largely due to the Homeric Epics and Schliemanns excavations. What is known of Troy and the area about Troy can be deduced from current land use.

Troy is situated at the south end of the Hellespont. It is an ideal location for collecting tolls from coastwise shipping which was common at the time. Troy is in a coastal plain that has produced wheat for centuries. The Pelopenesus and Attica failed to produce enough wheat to sustain the population. Where might Greek coastal shippers go for additional wheat? Egypt and Asia Minor are obvious sources, but Troy with its fortress may have blocked access to the farmers along the Hellespont.

Tooki, I think you have made a significant observation. The food short Greeks could well have been hungry for grain, not for Helen. Homer was writing fiction not history. I think we know that. A war with the Trojans for plunder is not nearly so romantic as a war to retrieve a kidnapped bride. Like fiction writers in general, Homer knew his readers.

Bubble
March 31, 2003 - 01:58 am
Mal, do me a favor. Take a dry fig on a skewer and have it "roasted" on an open fire, even on an electric heater (did that once at work!) like you would with a marshmallow. It is like ambrosia~!



Robby, your post brought to mind what my husband told me of his childhood in Turkey. There too bread and cake were seldom baked at home.
Housewives prepared the bread themselves in fancy shapes and sent the younger children to the baker to put in his communal oven. His mother used to send also big clay terrines of vegetables, marrow bones and rice with spices and ubiquitous olive oil to be baked there for hours until it became a delicious unidentified amalgam.
This would taste a little like a paella in Spain or a tagine in Morocco. To this day it is done, even in big cities like Izmir and not only in traditional villages. Bubble

robert b. iadeluca
March 31, 2003 - 04:24 am
Durant moves on to the next section.

"Out of the earth come minerals and fuels as well as food. Lighting is provided by graceful lamps or torches -- burning refined olive oil, or resin -- or by candles. Heat is derived from dry wood, or charcoal, burning in portable braziers.

The cutting of trees for fuel and building denudes the woods and hills near the towns. Already in the fifth century timber for houses, furniture and ships is imported. There is no coal."

It appears that environmental problems already existed 2,500 years ago. Man again ignoring nature.

Robby

Éloïse De Pelteau
March 31, 2003 - 05:56 am
Robby, Does man ignore nature or is his motive survival when he cuts wood for fuel or housing? We often think that pollution or environmental problems are something new, but now I realize that it has been with us since the beginning of time. Environmental damage erodes the soil and when it is barren, a population invades another one less damaged, looting its rich soil.

As Tooki said, the reason for war is commodities/economy. Nothing changed over the centuries, we are still fighting wars for commodities, never mind the territory, just hand over the goods because invaders don't want the population for slavery any more.

Bubble, I never thought of roasting a fig. I must try that.

Eloïse

tooki
March 31, 2003 - 07:48 am
Eloise: Check out the site given in my post 89, if you haven't. It speaks directly to your point.

On a lighter note (forgive the digression), I once "made" green olives, when I lived in Fresno, California. At that time, around 1950, Fresno had many olive trees. The process was the basic farm method of throwing something into a large, earthern crock and letting it ferment.

Only with green olives the substance that made the green olives palatable was LYE! I don't remember the details, like how did I avoid getting any on me. I do remember they were delicious, and I felt as proud of my down-home abilities as any poor, pregnant, 20 year could.

I,too, will roast a dry fig. And, boy, it better be good!

Malryn (Mal)
March 31, 2003 - 08:18 am

Lye has been used since primitive times to preserve and cure many kinds of food. Native Americans used it to make hominy, and that method prevailed for a long, long time. New Englanders in my grandfather's time used lye made from wood ash as a preservative and to cure food.

Last night on Food TV I saw a method for preserving green olives by using enough salt in water that an egg will float in it, and adding hot peppers.

From pictures I've seen, I'd say the geography of Greece is, in a great part, rock. Human beings need shelter. Wood provides shelter. Was there an attempt in Ancient Greece to plant seedlings of trees after they were cut down?

Mal

kiwi lady
March 31, 2003 - 05:13 pm
This goes back a bit in posts but had to comment on a Constitutional Monarchy. The Queen has one important influence. Should a nation be in turmoil within the Government the Queen can dismiss Parliament and call for a new election. This happened with Gough Whitlam Govt in Australia because of Gough Whitlam the then Prime Minister. There was much controversy over the decision at the time.

I am in favour of a Monarchy. My grandfather who came from a very Political family and was a Party official was a staunch Monarchist. He believed a modern day Constitutional Monarchy was one of the most stable forms of Government today. They have been trying for years here to form a Republic but the majority of the public is against it. My grandfather belonged to the uquivalent of your Democratic Party.

Carolyn

robert b. iadeluca
March 31, 2003 - 07:37 pm
"The soil of Attica is rich in marble, iron, zinc, silver, and lead. The mines at Laurium, near the southern tip of the peninsula, are in the phrase of Aeschylus 'a fountain running silver' for Athens. They are a main support of the government, which retains all subsoil rights, and leases the mines to private operators for a talent ($6000) fee and one twenty-fourth of the product yearly.

"In 483 a prospector discovers the first really profitable veins at Laurium, and a silver rush takes place to the region of the mines. Only citizens are allowed to lease the properties, and only slaves perform the work. The pious Nicias, whose superstition will help to ruin Athens, makes $170 a day by leasing a thousand slaves to the mine operators at a rental of one obul (17 cents) each per day. Many an Athenian fortune is made in this way, or by lending money to the enterprise.

"The slaves in the mine number some twenty thousand, and include the superintendents and engineers. They work in ten-hour shifts, and the operations continue without interruption, night and day. If the slave rests he feels the foreman's lash. If he tries to escape, he is attached to his work by iron shackles. If he runs away and is captured, his forehead is branded with a hot iron.

"The galleries are but three feet high and two feet wide. The slaves, with pick or chisel and hammer, work on their knees, their stomachs, or their backs. The broken ore is carred out in baskets or bags handed from man to man, for the galleries are too narrow to let two men pass each other conveniently.

"The profits are enormous. In 483, the share received by the government is a hundred talents ($600,000) -- a windfall that builds a fleet for Athens and saves Greece at Salamis. Even for others than the slaves there is evil in this as well as good. The Athenian treasury becomes dependent upon the mines, and when, in the Peloponnesian War, the Spartans capture Lautrium, the whole economy of Athens is upset.

"The exhaustion of the veins in the fourth century co-operates with many other factors in Athenian decay. For Attica has no other precious metal in her soil."

Capitalism rears its ugly head. Precious metals cause a rush for quick profit. Fortunes made through loans. Slavery runs rampant. So much for democracy.

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
March 31, 2003 - 08:57 pm

"Lavrion is a Greek city of 10,000 inhabitants which is situated about 60 km south of Athens, and 20 km north of Sounion, an important tourist and archaeological site. In the areas around Lavrion, considerable ore deposits of lead and silver exist. These deposits were exploited for their minor silver content from the 14th century BC, and reached a peak during the Golden Age of Athens (5th century BC). It is estimated that the ancient Athenians developed ingenious techniques to process the ore deposits in the area around Lavrion to produce over 3500 tons of silver (worth over $1,000,000,000 at today's value of silver) together with a staggering 1,400,000 tons of lead. It has been estimated that 70% of the silver was produced during the 4th and 5th centuries BC. The silver from the mines of Lavrion served as the 'dollar' of the age and may have been the basis of the 'war chest' for financing the Trojan wars.



"In modern times lead mining was resumed in the late ninetieth century by a French company that marketed the extensive lead deposits created by the Greek mining. This led to the creation of a small city built on the tailings and slags of centuries of mining. The mines were closed permanently around 1980."

More

robert b. iadeluca
April 1, 2003 - 04:43 am
Excellent links, Mal! Opens up an entirely new point of view of the Ancient Greeks.

Robby

tooki
April 1, 2003 - 09:30 am
Not only did the Greeks NOT "plant seedlings," as Mal asks, they mined their land to exhaustion. I suppose they felt these resources were inhaustable, the way most people think today.

"The Old World, especially in the eastern half of the Mediterranean and the Near East, is limestone country, attractive for cultivation, but vulnerable to erosion. Limestone lands erode because soil is likely to be underlain at shallow depth by solid rock.

The bare limestone ribs of Mother Earth whiten the slopes of the ancient civilizations showing the cumulative effects of soil erosion over thousands of years. Man has long been in retreat before the growing desert he has helped to make.

The desert continues to grow, not because of climate, but because of continuing attrition of cover and surface."

Activities seeminly worthwhile in one period create horrors down the road, about sums it up.

Malryn (Mal)
April 1, 2003 - 09:47 am
"The quarrying and transport of marble and limestone were costly and labor-intensive, and often constituted the primary cost of erecting a temple. For example, the wealth Athens accumulated after the Persian Wars enabled Perikles to embark on his extensive building program, which included the Parthenon (447–432 B.C.) and other monuments on the Athenian Akropolis. Typically, a Greek civic or religious body engaged the architect, who participated in every aspect of construction. He usually chose the stone, oversaw its extraction, and supervised the craftsmen who roughly shaped each piece in the quarry. At the building site, expert carvers gave the blocks their final form, and workmen hoisted each one into place. The tight fit of the stones was enough to hold them in place without the use of mortar; metal clamps embedded in the stone reinforced the structure against earthquakes. A variety of skilled labor collaborated in the raising of a temple. Workmen were hired to construct the wooden scaffolding needed for hoisting stone blocks and sculpture, and to make the ceramic tiles for the roofs. Metalworkers were employed to make the metal fittings used for reinforcing the stone blocks and to fashion the necessary bronze accoutrements for sculpted scenes on the frieze, metopes and pediments. Sculptors from the Greek mainland and abroad carved freestanding and relief sculpture for the eaves of the temple building. Painters were engaged to decorate sculptural and architectural elements with painted details."

MORE

Tejas
April 1, 2003 - 03:05 pm
At long last, I have found a secret place where there have every volume of the Story of Civilization but the first. Good thing we are well past that.

robert b. iadeluca
April 1, 2003 - 05:45 pm
Ah, but Tejas, we did cover the first volume, "Our Oriental Heritage, in detail beginning November 1, 2001 and except for a one month break between that volume and "The Life of Greece," have been going steadily ever since. You can no longer post in "Our Oriental Heritage" but you can read all the posts we made throughout the months by clicking onto the ARCHIVE and start to read beginning from November 1st -- over a year and a half ago.

You are welcome to read that but we would hope that you would remain active in The Life of Greece because, as you know, we are a fast-moving forum.

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
April 1, 2003 - 06:05 pm
"Attica has many other industries, small in scale but remarkably specialized. It quarries marble and other stones. It makes a thousand shapes of pottery. It dresses hides in great tanneries like those owned by Cleon, rival of Pericles, and Anytus, accuser of Socrates. It has wagon-makers, shipbuilders, saddlers, harness makers, shoe manufacturers. There are saddlers who make only bridles, and shoemakers who make only men's or women's shoes.

"In the building trades are carpenters, molders, stonecutters, metalworkers, painters, veneerers. There are blacksmiths, swordmakers, shieldmakers, lampmakers, lyre tuners, millers, bakers, sausage men, fishmongers -- everything necessary to an economic life busy and varied, but not mechanized or monotonous.

"Common textiles are still for the most part produced in the home. There the women who weave and mend the ordinary clothing and bedding of the family, some carding the wool, some at the spinning wheel, some at the loom, some bent over an embroidery frame.

"Special fabrics come from workshops, or from abroad -- fine linens from Egypt, Amorgos, and Tarentum, dyed woolens from Syracuse, blankets from Corinth, carpets from the Near East and Carthage, colorful coverlets from Cyprus. The women of Cos, late in the fourth century, learn the art of unwinding the cocoons of the silkworm and weaving the filaments into silk.

"In some homes the women becme so highly skilled in textile arts that they produce more than their families can use. They sell the surplus at first to consumers, then to middlemen. They employ helpers, freedmen or slaves. In this way a domestic industry develops as a step to a factory system."

As Americans moved westward in Colonial times and took part in the same activities as just described, and as the same development took place in Australia and New Zealand, I wonder if those pioneers stopped to realize that they were following -- almost to the letter - the same type of industry building that had taken place 2,500 years earlier.

Robby

Bubble
April 2, 2003 - 03:16 am
This reminds me of the similar industries in Viet Nam, Thailand and that part of the world. I also can think of the batik materials produced in Java, for me the most lovely and intricate world wide.

robert b. iadeluca
April 2, 2003 - 04:57 am
"The first difficulty when trade begins is that transport is costly, for roads are poor, and the sea is a snare. The finest road is the Sacred Way from Athens to Eleusis. This is mere dirt, and is often too narrow to let vehicles pass. The bridges are precarious causeways formed by earthen dikes, which as likely as not have been washed away by floods. The usual draft animal is the ox, who is too philosophical to enrich the trader that depends upon him for transport. Wagons are fragile, and always break down, or get bogged in the mud. It is better to pack the goods on the back of a mule, for he goes a trifle faster, and does not take up so much of the road.

"There is no postal service in Greece, even for the government. They are content with runners, and private correspondence must wait the chance of using these. Important news can be flashed by fire beacons from hill to hill, or sent by carrier pigeons. There are inns here and there on the road, but they are favored by robbers and vermin. Even the god Dionysus, in Aristophanes, inquires of Heracles for 'the eating-houses and hostels where there are the fewest bugs.'

"Sea transport is cheaper, especially if voyages are limited, as most of them are, to the calm summer months. Passenger tariffs are low. For two drachmas ($2) a family can secure passage from the Piraeus to Egypt or the Black Sea, but ships do not cater to passengers, being made to carry goods or wage war or do do either at need.

"The main motive power is wind upon a sail, but slaves ply the oars when the wind is contrary or dead. The smallest seagoing merchant vessels are triaconters with thirty oars, all on one level. The penteconter has fifty.

"Back about 700 the Corinthians launched the first trireme, with a crew of two hundred men plying three banks or tiers of oars. By the fifth century such ships, beautiful with their long and lofty prows, have grown to 256 tons, carry seven thousand bushels of grain, and become the talk of the Mediterranean by making eight miles an hour."

The story of transportation is always fascinating!

Robby

tooki
April 2, 2003 - 03:17 pm
This site has many pictures of Triremes. To see bigger versions, click on a little one.

Greek Ships

I don't think these have been posted before.

tooki
April 2, 2003 - 03:31 pm
The Durants' view that "Because muscle power is cheap there is no incentive to develop machinery," seems if not silly, at least not an explanation. I don't think the presence of slaves in the USA inhibited inventors of various machines for picking and harvesting cotton.

Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin in 1793. Presumably, slaves were then no longer needed for some chores. Nothing changed, did it?

Malryn (Mal)
April 2, 2003 - 04:20 pm
Just curious. Why don't you like the Durants, Tooki? I haven't seen much you've posted which is positive about their work. Is it because you've found books which you think are better researched or appear to be more up-to-date?

Mal

Fifi le Beau
April 2, 2003 - 06:14 pm
Cotton was always a labor intensive enterprise. The invention of the cotton gin did help, but the removal of seeds from the cotton was only a small part of producing cotton. My grandmother had inherited from her grandmother a spinning wheel and cotton batts. While spending the summer at about age 10, I decided to make a quilt for my doll bed. My grandparents owned a cotton farm so there was always cotton on hand. They also had a gin, but my grandmother kept a bag of cotton unginned for her quilts. She gave me a small pile and told me to begin removing the seeds. I did this and then put the seedless cotton on the batt. When I had enough to cover one batt, she showed me how to pull the other batt across and lift the carded cotton. This was fun when you were ten. According to diaries and journals from ancestors, this type of work was done in the winter when work on the farm was less intensive.

The heavy labor of growing cotton was plowing, planting, cultivation, and then the hard labor of harvesting. The first commercially marketed cotton picker was not available until 1948. By 1950 it had become a viable alternative for hand picking. The cotton picking machine began the great migration from the cotton belt 1949 to 1964.

Although that side of my family no longer grows cotton, I have records and journals that tells some of the story. The largest cotton farm is now under water, as it was used to form a lake and backwater when the dam was built about the time I was making my doll quilt. Now we ride sea-dos and sailboats across that once fertile land.

From the cotton gin to the cotton picker was 157 years. It was the harvesting of cotton that required droves of pickers and hard labor, and that did not cease until 1950.

You can buy a cotton picker on e-Bay.

......

Malryn (Mal)
April 2, 2003 - 06:20 pm

ARCHIMEDES: THE HYDRAULIC SCREW

robert b. iadeluca
April 2, 2003 - 06:49 pm
Good to hear from you again, Fifi!!

Robby

tooki
April 2, 2003 - 10:06 pm
Mal's question: I admire the sweep of the narrative, the depth of the research and the vastness of the endeavor. The work seems to me, unfortunately, frequently dated.

Social attitudes, scholarly concerns, and new research findings have changed the meanings of much of what the Durants' said. Scholars these days seem to think it presumptous to attempt to have a command of the whole history of civilization.

If my occasional impatient outbursts are troublesome I need to know. I am not used to reading uncritically or unanalytically.

Malryn (Mal)
April 2, 2003 - 10:35 pm
"Frequently dated". I've heard this before. How can the antiquities and Ancient History about which the Durants wrote be dated any more than they are? There have been some new findings, but through links to articles we have read about those new ideas, we have in fact done exactly the kind of updating and augmenting the Durants would have done if they were alive today. No matter what you call it in a politically correct way, or however you spell it, human behavior, as described by the Durants, has not changed from before history was first etched in stone to now.

This reminds me of once when I went to the Office of Vocational Rehabilitation in the mid-70's after my divorce. I told the representative that I am a college graduate and when I graduated. He said, "Your education isn't worth anything today."

I laughed to myself. I studied classical music, classical literature in three languages and classical art, as well as what was contemporary for the day in those areas and several others, plus study I did afterwards on my own.

What is determined to be classic does not change. What was contemporary in 1950 has become classic now. A background like that is worth nothing? I disagree, just as I respectfully disagree that the Durants' Story of Civilization is dated in the way some people appear to believe it is.

Mal

Hats
April 3, 2003 - 12:43 am
I am enjoying and learning from the discussion. I read each excerpt from Durant's book. Then, I read the links. All of it is very exciting. It's like taking a free course in college. Comparing our society today with one that was so very progressive is wonderful.

I think Durant's volumes are classics, historical classics. Classics, of any kind, live beyond their time and into another time. Who would doubt the historical value of Gibbons' Fall of the Roman Empire?

robert b. iadeluca
April 3, 2003 - 04:34 am
"The second problem of trade is to find a reliable medium of exchange. Every city has its own system of weights and measures, and its own individual coinage. At every one of a hundred frontiers one must transvalue all values skeptically, for every Greek government except the Athenian cheats by debasing its coins. Says an anonymous Greek, 'In most cities merchants are compelled to ship goods for the return journey, for they cannot get money that is of any use to them elsewhere.

"Some cities mint coins of electrum -- a compound of silver and gold -- and rival one another in getting as little gold as possible into the mixture. The Athenian government, from Solon onward, helps Athenian trade powerfully by establishing a reliable coinage, stamped with the owl of Athena. 'Taking owls to Athens' is the Greek equivalent of 'carrying coals to Newcastle.' Because Athens, through all her vicissitudes, refuses to depreciate her silver drachmas, these 'owls' are accepted gladly throughout the Mediterranean world, and tend to displace local currencies in the Aegean.

"Gold at this stage is still an article of merchandise, sold by weight, rather than a vehicle of trade. Athens mints it only in rare emergencies, usually in a ration to silver of 14 to 1. The smallest Athenian coins are of copper. Eight of them make an obol -- a coin of iron or bronze, named from its resemblance to nails or spits (obeliskoi). Six obols make a drachma, i.e. a handful. Two dracmas make a gold stater. One hundred dracmas make a mina. Sixty minas mke a talent. A dracma in the first half of the fifth century buys a bushel of grain, as a dollar does in twentieth-century America.

"There is no paper money in Athens, no government bonds, no joint-stock corporation, no stock exchange."

Anyone here want to compare methods of medium of exchange in Ancient Greece with our methods today? What about the reliable "owls?" Similar to the dollar? The euro? Any "monetary expert" here want to help us understand "depreciation" and its effect on society as a whole?

Your Discussion Leader is NOT an expert in this area -- simple language please!!

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
April 3, 2003 - 09:44 am
What follows is a link to a long and, to me, quite complicated discussion about Ancient Greek money. As a preface, I am posting this.
"Numismatists have failed to consider that the long thin rectangular spits found at the Heraion were an object of daily use in Greece, both in preclassical and in classical times. They were called ojbelivskoi, boupovroi ojbeloiv, or boupovroi ojbelivskoi. The ojbelov is a pointed tool, a spike, as indicated also by its etymology: the word ojbelov with its parallel forms ojbolov and ojdelov, is derived from bavllw and its parallel form -dellw, the basic meaning of which is to prick. It is connected with belovnh, needle, bevlo, missile, pointed weapon."
Click the right arrow on each page for more.

Ancient Greek Money

Fifi le Beau
April 3, 2003 - 01:31 pm
Richard Perle head of the Defense Policy Board has just named his new company Trireme Partners. It is a company dealing with technology, goods, and services that are of value to homeland security and defense. He recently resigned as head of the board, but is still on the committee. The word "Trireme" jumped out at me while reading an article on him, since this group had just discussed Greek ships.

Our coinage has similarities with Greece. Their lowest coin was made of copper, and our penny once was made of the same. I think it is mostly zinc now, with traces of copper.

Our currency is traded on the International market, and I do remember during the 80's when the Yen was strong, that our currency was devalued. The strength of the dollar is important, but in a global economy other nations strength can become a factor.

Our dollar is accepted and valued in many places of the world, even above the local currency. During the war against Afghanistan, our CIA flew in trunks full of hundred dollar bills to pay off warlords. They wanted payment in US dollars, not their own currency.

The Greeks refusal to devalue their currency even in bad times, kept it strong and accepted within their part of the world. Our sphere of influence is great, but could be vulnerable to world markets.

One man in Hongkong trading in currency, bankrupted one of the largest banks in Europe.

......

Justin
April 4, 2003 - 01:55 am
Some simplified definitions follow for Deflation, inflation and depreciation.

Price is an expression of the value of goods and services at any given moment in time. If the Federal Reserve doubles the number of dollars in circulation the price of goods and services would double ( all other things being equal). That is called inflation. If on the other hand, the Federal Reserve calls in half the dollars in circulation, the price of goods and services would fall by half. That is called deflation.

Depreciation is concerned with the quantity of valuable metal (silver for example) in a coin. Coins were sometimes scraped or cut on the edges peeling away some of the basic metal. Thus the coin contains less of the base metal and is no longer valued at face denomination. That is depreciation.

robert b. iadeluca
April 4, 2003 - 03:52 am
Thank you, Justin. A very simple explanation.

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
April 4, 2003 - 04:04 am
"The average fifth-century Athenian is a hoarder. If he has savings , he prefes to hide them rather than entrust them to the banks. Some men lend money on mortgages, at 16 to 18 percent. Some lend it, without interest, to their friends. Some deposit their money in temple treasuries. The temples serve as banks, and lend to individuals and states at a moderate interest. The temple of Apollo at Delphi is in some measure an international bank for all Greece.

"There are no private loans to government, but occasionally one state lends to another. Meanwhile the money-changer at his table (trapeza) begins in the fifth century to receive money on deposit, and to lend it to merchants at interest rates that vary from 12 to 30 percent according to the risk. In this way he becomes a banker, though to the end of ancient Greece he keeps his early name of trapezite, the man at the table.

"He takes his methods from the Near East, improves them, and passes them on to Rome, which hands them down to modern Europe. Soon after the Persian War Themistocles deposits seventy talents ($420,000) with the Corinthian banker Philostephanus, very much as political adventurers feather foreign nests for themselves today. This is the earliest known allusion to secular -- nontemple -- banking. Toward the end of the century Antisthenes and Archestratus establish what will become, under Pasion, the most famous of all private Greek banks.

"Through such trapezitai money circulates more freely and rapidly, and so does more work, then before. The facilities that they offer stimulate creatively the expansion of Athenian trade."

Your comments, please?

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
April 4, 2003 - 07:10 am
I was wondering where Themistocles acquired such wealth and found this in Plutarchs Lives


"Themistocles is said to have been eager in the acquisition of riches, according to some, that he might be the more liberal; for loving to sacrifice often, and to be splendid in his entertainment of strangers, he required a plentiful revenue; yet he is accused by others of having been parsimonious and sordid to that degree that he would sell provisions which were sent to him as a present. He desired Diphilides, who was a breeder of horses, to give him a colt, and when he refused it, threatened that in a short time he would turn his house into a wooden horse, intimating that he would stir up dispute and litigation between him and some of his relations."
Themistocles was a naval commander, who at one point convinced others that certain revenues from silver mines at Laurium, usually divided among the Athenians, should instead be used to build a fleet of ships so war could be fought with the Aeginetans, the most flourishing people in Greece. The Aeginetans controlled the seas because of the number of ships they had.

This also comes from Plutarch and leads me to believe that not only through a kind of democratic distribution of wealth, Athenians became wealthy through the spoils of war.

Why does this make me think of the war in Iraq?

Mal

Malryn (Mal)
April 4, 2003 - 03:58 pm
What is quoted below is from a BBC site.


"Between a quarter and a third of Athens 300,000 population were slaves. These were men and women captured in wars or born into slavery.

"Many slaves had special skills, such as nurses and teachers, while others had the hardest and most unpleasant work to do. It was common for a rich household to have many slaves.





"Some slaves were owned by the state. For example archers from Scythia were used as a kind of police force by the Athenian government."

Justin
April 4, 2003 - 06:22 pm
I was amused to see that Iraqi troop divisions are named for the ancients. There is a Hammurabi Division and a Nebuchadrezzar Division. Battle descriptions in an around the Tigris and Euphates rivers could easily cause one to think one is reading ancient history. We here in this forum have images of Babylonians and Assyrians fighting it out. Unfortunately, the dead and wounded are contemporary Americans.

robert b. iadeluca
April 4, 2003 - 06:56 pm
"The shopkeepers, artisans, merchants, and bankers come almost entirely from the voteless classes. The burgher looks down upon manual labor, and does as little of it as he may. To work for a livelihood is considered ignoble. Even the professional practice or teaching of music, sculpture, or painting is accounted by many Greeks 'a mean occupation.'

"To the aristocratic or philosophical Greek trade is merely money-making at the expense of others. It aims not to create goods but to buy them cheap and sell them dear. A respectable citizen may quietly invest in it and profit from it so long as he lets others do the work.

"A freeman, says the Greek, must be free from economic tasks. He must get slaves or others to attend to his material concerns, even, if he can, to take care of his property and his fortune. Only by such liberation can he find time for government, war, literature, and philosophy.

"Without a leisure class there can be, in the Greek view, no standards of taste, no encouragement of the arts, no civilization.

"No man who is in a hurry is quite civilized."

Surely there will be some comments here!

Robby

Bubble
April 5, 2003 - 01:45 am
Someone struggling to make ends meet, even the most talented, has no much energy left for creating great musical or pictural compositions. This would require a certain serenity and time to transform deep emotions or feelings into artistical expressions.

Malryn (Mal)
April 5, 2003 - 05:33 am
When I read "No man who is in a hurry is quite civilized" I thought of the ridiculous pace of American life and things like rudeness and the loss of control which is called road rage.

BUBBLE is right. It's hard to be creative when one is worrying about where his or her next meal will come from. I think the element of time is important for creative and intellectual pursuits. If you're so busy finding the means to exist, there isn't the energy or time to turn an idea into more than just that.

The concept of a productive artist, poet or philosopher in a cold, drafty garret is a romantic one, though a rare few creative people have transcended such inconveniences as little food and no heat. Freedom from worry and a certain degree of comfort seem important where intellectual productivity is concerned. This may be one reason why some of our elected officials come from rich families.

Mal

robert b. iadeluca
April 5, 2003 - 10:26 am
I am having a serious problem with the computer and may have to get a new one. I don't know how long this one will operate.

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
April 5, 2003 - 10:51 am
That's too bad, Robby. Don't worry. We'll be here carrying along. Carrying on?

Mal

robert b. iadeluca
April 5, 2003 - 11:11 am
"Most of the functions associated in history with the middle class are in Athens performed by metics -- freemen of foreign birth who, though ineligible to citizenship, have fixed their domicile in Athens. For the most part they are professional men, merchants, contractors, manufacturers, managers, tradesmen, craftsmen, artists, who, in the course of their wandering, have found in Athens the economic liberty, opportunity, and stimulus which to them is far more vital than the vote.

"The most important industrial undertakings, outside of mining, are owned by metics. The ceramic industry is theirs completely. Wherever middle men can squeeze themselves in betwen producer and consumer they are to be found.

"The law harasses them and protects them. It taxes them like citizens, lays 'liturgies' upon them, exacts military service from them, and adds a poll tax for good measure. It forbids them to own land or to marry into the family of a citizen. It excludes them from its religious organization, and from direct appeal to its courts.

"But it welcomes them into its economic life, appreciates their industry and skill, enforces their contracts, gives them religious freedom, and guards their wealth against violent revolution. Some of them flaunt their riches vulgarly, but some of them, too, work quietly in science, literature, and the arts, practice law or medicine and create schools of rhetoric and philosophy. In the fourth century they will provide the authors and subject of the comic drama, and in the third they will set the cosmopolitan tone of Hellenistic society. They itch for citizenship, but they love Athens proudly, and contribute painfully to finance her defense against her enemies.

"Through them, chiefly, the fleet is maintained, the empire is supported, and the commercial supremacy of Athens is preserved."

Foreigners (aliens) who are active in the business world, are permanent residents, and pay taxes, but for various reasons are not eligible for citizenship. Furthermore many of these folks find "econmic liberty more vital than the vote." Sound familiar?

Robby

Bubble
April 5, 2003 - 11:43 am
Here too we have citizens, and others who are permanent residents by choice most often because their country of origin does not accept dual citizenship and they do not want to lose theirs. The permanent residents cannot vote for the general elections, but they do vote for the municipal elections of the town they live in. of course they do pay taxes too. Bubble

Justin
April 5, 2003 - 12:58 pm
The work of Henri Murger, apparently, has not convinced one and all that Bohemians living in cold, Paris, attics are able to create great works of art while starving to death. The rule of Durant which says food first, shelter second, thinking time third, applies even in Parisian novels where the hero must burn his manuscript for warmth and a friend must sell an overcoat, an old friend, to save a life.

robert b. iadeluca
April 6, 2003 - 07:28 am
Our discussion regarding the privileges of citizens and non-citizens in Ancient Greece calls to mind that in July, 2002, an executive order was signed providing that any legal immigrant who has been on active duty since September 11, 2001, may immediately apply for citizenship, bypassing the normal three-year waiting period for military personnel and the five-year period for civilians.

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
April 6, 2003 - 09:54 am
Durant says: "Most of the functions associated in history with the middle class are in Athens performed by metics -- freemen of foreign birth who, though ineligible to citizenship, have fixed their domicile in Athens."

Would I be right to assume that citizens of other city states, despite the fact that all these city states are in Greece, would be foreigners, thus metics, if they moved to Athens?

Mal

robert b. iadeluca
April 6, 2003 - 05:12 pm
"There is no caste among the freemen in Athens, and a man may by resolute ability rise to anything but citizenship. Hence, in part, the fever and turbulence of Athenian life.

"There is no tense class distinction between employer and employee except in the mines. Usually the master works beside his men, and personal acquaintance dulls the edge of exploitation. The wage of nearly all artisans, of whatever class, is a drachma for each actual day of work, but unskilled workers may get as low as three obols (50 cents) a day. Piece work tends to replace timework as the factory system develops. Wages begin to vary more wdely. A contractor may hire slaves from their owner for a rental of one to four obols a day.

"We may estimate the buying power of these wages by comparing Greek prices with our own. In 414 a house and estate in Attica cost twelve hundred drachmas. A medinmus, or 1 1/2 bushels of barley, costs a drachma in the sixty century, two at the close of the fifth, three in the fourth, five in the time of Alexander. A sheep costs a drachma in Solon's day, ten to twenty at the end of the fifth century. In Athens as elsewere currency tends to increase faster than goods, and prices rise. At the close of the fourth century prices are five times as high as at the opening of the sixth. They double from 480 to 404, and again from 404 to 330.

"The landowner profits from the rising value of his land. The merchant does his best, despite a hundred laws, to secure corners and monopolies. The speculator reaps, through the high rate of interest on loans, the lion's share of the proceeds of industry and trade. Demagogues arise who point out to the poor the inequality of human possessions, and conceal from them the inequality of human economic abiity.

"The poor man, face to face with wealth, becomes conscious of his poverty, broods over his unrewarded merits, and dreams of perfect states. Bitterer than the war of Greece with Persia, or of Athens with Sparta is, in all the Greek states, the war of class with class."

As we move through history, are we beginning to find that MONEY is always the bottom line? Will class warfare always exist?

Robby

Justin
April 6, 2003 - 10:18 pm
I think the haves and have-nots will always be with us even though we are striving to make women equal to men and blacks equal to whites and all classes in the U.S. equal before the law. The constant inequality between supply and demand requires adjustment now and then and that promotes a new batch of have-nots.

The English class system is, I think, diminishing its emphasis on nobility and the landed gentry is growing in numbers. Home ownership is a great equalizer. Access to professional education tends to reduce class distinction in the US as well as in Briton.

In India the untouchables are touchable these days.

However, the world is still plagued by class separation between Christian, Jew and Muslim. Oddly enough, they all profess loyalty to the same father- Abraham.

robert b. iadeluca
April 7, 2003 - 04:52 am
As we continue to discuss Class Warfare way back there 2,500 years ago, the editorial in this morning New York Times reminds us that "man's inhumanity to man" continues to exist.

"A Global Catalog of Wrongs


Around this time each year, the State Department produces a remarkable document detailing the human rights practices and problems of almost every country in the world. Dispensing with the niceties of diplomatic language, the report looks at friend and foe alike with candid scrutiny.

Among the nations that come in for criticism are a number of members of President Bush's Coalition of the Willing for the invasion of Iraq — embarrassing company in a campaign whose aims include liberating the Iraqi people from dictatorship. Uzbekistan routinely tortures detainees and some have died in custody. Eritrea has ended freedom of the press and restricts religious freedom. Azerbaijan arbitrarily detains dissidents and rigs elections. Significant violations are noted in such other coalition members as Colombia, the Dominican Republic, Georgia, Macedonia, Rwanda, Uganda and Ethiopia. In all seven, the overall human rights situation was rated as poor.

Of course, the "axis of evil" also rightly comes in for plenty of scorn. The White House's main security concern has been these countries' weapons programs and alleged links to terrorism. But Iraq, North Korea and Iran also victimize their own people. Baghdad has ordered executions without trial, political murders, torture and deadly persecution of Shiite Muslims. North Korea is an absolute dictatorship with detention camps, torture and harsh prison conditions, including deliberate starvation. Iran, relatively better, is still horrific, with arbitrary arrests, disappearances and sadistic punishments like stoning and flogging.

Several other governments deserve dishonorable mention. Myanmar, formerly Burma, is responsible for punitive rape by soldiers, forced relocation of ethnic minorities, forced labor and conscription of children. Turkmenistan's self-glorifying autocrat models his repressive rule on Stalin's.

China is much freer than before. But its sheer size makes it the world's No. 1 quantitative violator of human rights. Beijing executed more than 3,000 people last year, many without due process. It uses torture, forced confessions, imprisonment in psychiatric hospitals and lengthy detentions with no right to communicate with family members or lawyers.

The report cites several countries for withholding sleep and food to extract confessions, techniques some have charged American authorities with using in Afghanistan and Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. These methods are correctly listed under the heading of "Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment and Punishment." Washington should reject them and should refuse to hand over prisoners to countries that routinely use torture. The rights report must become a tool not just for documenting abuses, but also for combating them."

robert b. iadeluca
April 7, 2003 - 05:50 am
A possible response to the questions in the Heading

Isn't it strange that Princes and Kings,
And clowns that caper in sawdust rings,
And common people like you and me,
Are builders of eternity?

To each is given a bag of tools,
A shapeless mass, a set of rules.
For each to make 'ere life is flown
A stumbling block -- or a stepping stone.

R.L. Sharp

Ginny
April 7, 2003 - 08:06 am
I LIKE that, Robby!

ginny

Malryn (Mal)
April 7, 2003 - 09:51 am
Yes, Robby, that's a wonderful quote.

I was so surprised to read that there was piece work in Ancient Athens. I grew up in a city whose main industry was shoes. Many, many people were hired by shoe factories to do piece work in their homes.

Mal

Malryn (Mal)
April 7, 2003 - 10:24 am
Has anything changed except technology in the past 2500 years?

robert b. iadeluca
April 7, 2003 - 06:23 pm
If nothing has changed in that period of time, then can we say that everything 2,500 years in the future will be as now?

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
April 7, 2003 - 06:48 pm
Durant now moves onto

The Morals and Manners of the Athenians

Please note the new GREEN quotes.

robert b. iadeluca
April 7, 2003 - 07:03 pm
"All the forces of religion, property, and the state unite to discountenance childlessness. Where no offspring comes, adoption is the rule, and high prices are paid for prepossessing orphans.

"At the same time law and public opinion accept infanticide as a legitimate safeguard against excess population and a pauperizing fragmentation of the land. Any father may expose a newborn child to death either as doubtfully his, or as weak or deformed. The children of slaves are seldom allowed to live.

"Girls are more subject to exposure than boys, for every daughter has to be provided with a dowry, and at marriage she passes from the home and service of those who have reared her into the service of those who have not.

"Exposure is effected by leaving the infant in a large earthenware vessel within the precincts of a temple or in some other place where it can soon be rescued if any wish to adopt it. The parental right to expose permits a rough eugenices, and co-operates with a rigorous natural selection by hardship and competition to make the Greeks a strong and healthy people.

"The philosophers almost unanimously approve of family limitation. Plato will call for the exposure of all feeble children, and of those born of base or elderly parents, and Aristotle will defend abortion as preferable to infanticide.

"The Hippocratic code of medical ethics will not allow the physican to effect abortion, but the Greek midwife is an experienced hand in this field, and no law impedes her."

An interesting section to those who thought that birth control was a recent concept.

Robby

Justin
April 7, 2003 - 10:47 pm
It looks as though the abortion battle has been with us for quite some time. Plato, Aristotle and the midwives favored abortion and some fat legislators forbid physicians to participate. Has anything changed since that time. I don't think so. We still have fat legislators trying to outlaw the procedure for young women in dire need.

I can remember a time, not so long ago, when women in dire need went to midwives and butchers in back alleys because obstetricians were forbidden to abort a pregnancy. Abortion has been practiced in many of the societies we have encountered and it is only recently that physicians have been able, legally, to provide medical assistance. What a blessing that has been. No more abortion induced septicemia.

Bubble
April 7, 2003 - 11:37 pm
But isn't abortion illegal in many of the states? and aren't new laws being created to limit it where is is possible?



Nothing has perceptibly change and it probably will not. At most there will seem to be changes overtly but underneath it will stay all the same.



On the tenth day the child is accepted in the family? Sounds much like our ceremony of circumcision on the 8th day and only then is the child given a name.

robert b. iadeluca
April 8, 2003 - 04:16 am
Bubble, you say:--"On the tenth day the child is accepted in the family? Sounds much like our ceremony of circumcision on the 8th day and only then is the child given a name."

You often mention similarities between Hebrew and Greek culture. To me, that means I must not forget our "Oriental Heritage."

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
April 8, 2003 - 05:07 am
"Usually a Greek has but one name, like Socrates or Archimedes. But since it is customary to call the eldest son after the paternal grandfather, repetition is frequent, and Greek history is confounded with a multiplicity of Xenophons, Aeschineses, Thycydideses, Diogeneses, and Zenos. To avoid ambiguity the father's name or the place of birth may be added, as with Kimon Miltiadou -- Cimon son of Miltiades -- or Diodorus Siculus -- Diodorus of Sicily. The problem may be solved by some jolly nicknamne, like Callimedon -- The Crab."

Don't we have similar things in the Western Civilization -- for example "Peterson?"

Robby

CalKan
April 8, 2003 - 10:05 am
Thank you all for your contributions to the discussion. I am getting a free education. What did i the Greeks do about incapacitated adult, and more specifically slaves, due to injury, disease, old age?

CalKan
April 8, 2003 - 10:12 am
Thank you all for your very interesting contributions. I am here every day and delight in the links. What did the Greeks do about incapacitated adults, and more specifically slaves, due to injury, disease, old age?

robert b. iadeluca
April 8, 2003 - 05:12 pm
I am giving a public answer here to an email that was sent to me.

I consider this discussion group an OASIS. We are all very well aware of the ongoing war. Some of us have family members overseas or home in the military. Some of us read the newspapers avidly. Some of us are glued to the TV sets. This seems like the "real world" and the topic of this forum at times may seem irrelevant.

There is such a thing, however, as getting too close to "real" events and staying there much too long. The tendency may be to see the current warfare as so important that one must not stay away from observing it too long.

Senior Netters are faithful people who do not stay away from the SN for any length of time. But they have their choice. They can enter the Political discussion groups and find themselves involved in a war of their own. Or they can enter the Religious forums where heated discussions are the norm.

There comes a time, I submit, when we get so close to the trees that we can't see the entire forest -- where we see only a certain few nations in the news or examine only the present era. Fatigue sets in. Over us comes an overwhelming need for peace and quiet and relief. A need to step back and see the human race as it is, as it has been, and as it may be.

Speaking for myself, this is where the Story of Civilization comes in. I touch base daily with Will and Ariel Durant and ask them to explain to me just what is going on with all of us. And in an easy manner with easily understood ways, they help me to "get the picture." I say to myself: "Oh, that's why this group or that individual acts that way." And I gradually come to the realization that the development of democracy in Ancient Greece is the story of the "real world," not the brief skirmishes here and there around our planet as the centuries and millennia pass.

And so each morning and each evening I stop to drink at this OASIS, pause to listen to the wise words of the Durants, and swap words with you thirsty travelers who are also tired of "man's inhumanity to man" and who come regularly to drink from this same well.

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
April 8, 2003 - 05:22 pm
Thank you, Robby. That is a wonderful letter. I'm very glad I can come to this oasis, too.

Hello, CalKan. I've been searching the web for information about incapacitated adults in Ancient Athens, but thus far have only found material about the Romans. When I find something, I'll post a link here.

Mal

Malryn (Mal)
April 8, 2003 - 05:49 pm

If anyone thinks this current war is not related to various other wars in Ancient History we've read about in Our Oriental Heritage and Life of Greece, he or she is mistaken, in my opinion. Since beginning this study (and for me it is a study), my comprehension of why things happen today has increased tenfold.

That slipped out of my mind to my keyboard so easily -- tenfold -- that I had to look it up. Yup, it says exactly what I meant.

Mal

Malryn (Mal)
April 8, 2003 - 09:30 pm

"GREEK BABIES: The ancient Greeks considered their children to be 'youths' until they reached the age of 30! When a child was born to ancient Greek family, a naked father carried his child, in a ritual dance, around the household. Friends and relatives sent gifts. The family decorated the doorway of their home with a wreath of olives (for a boy) or a wreath of wool (for a girl).



"GREEK GIRLS: In Athens, as in most Greek city-states, with the exception of Sparta, girls stayed at home until they were married. Like their mother, they could attend certain festivals, funerals, and visit neighbors for brief periods of time. Their job was to help their mother, and to help in the fields, if necessary.



"GREEK BOYS: In most Greek city-states, when young, the boys stayed at home, helping in the fields, sailing, and fishing. At age 6 or 7, they went to school."

MORE HERE

3kings
April 9, 2003 - 01:44 am
CALKAN You ask what the greeks did with the sick and the aged. I guess they mostly just left them to die. They had no medical knowledge, so apart from feeding the ill with herbs, etc. the sick were just left to die. I suppose some were taken to the temple, where, for a fee, someone would recite some giberish over them. There was nothing else to be done.-- Trevor

robert b. iadeluca
April 9, 2003 - 03:32 am
"The tragedies of adolescence are eased with many games, some of which still survive the memory of Greece. On a white perfume vase made for a child's grave a little boy is seen taking his toy cart with him down to Hades. Babies have terra-cotta rattles containing pebbles -- girls keep house with their dolls -- boys fight great campaigns with clay soldiers and generals -- nurses push children on swings or balance them on seesaws -- boys and girls roll hoops, fly kites, spin tops, play hide-and-seek or blindman's buff or tug of war, and wage a hundred merry contests with pebbles, nuts, coins, and balls.

"The marbles of the Golden Age are dried beans shot from the fingers, or smooth stones shot or tossed into a circle to dislodge enemy stones and come to rest as near as possible to the center. As children approach the 'age of reason' -- seven or eight -- they take up the game of dice by throwing square knucklebones (astragali), the highest throw, six, being counted the best."

Does this bring back any memories?

Robby

Hats
April 9, 2003 - 04:18 am
Funny, their childhood games don't sound very different from the ones I played as a child. I loved playing with dolls and playing hide and seek. I would think that a healthy society would always nurture play for children. I think it is during play that children learn to share and also imagine their future roles in society.

Mal, thank you for the links. I enjoy and learn from them.

Malryn (Mal)
April 9, 2003 - 07:20 am

Children in Ancient Greece

robert b. iadeluca
April 9, 2003 - 08:02 am
"Athens provides public gymnasiums and palaestras, and exercises some loose supervision over teachers, but the city has no public schools or state universities, and education remains in private hands. Plato advocates state schools.

"Professional schoolmasters set up their own schools, to which freeborn boys are sent at the age of six. The name paidagogos is given not to the teacher but to the slave who conducts the boy daily to and from school. We hear of no boarding schools.

Attendance at school continues until fourteen or sixteen, or until a later age among the well to do. The schools have no desks but only benches. The pupil holds on his knee the roll from which he reads or the material upon which he writes. Some schools, anaticipating much later fashions, are adorned with statues of Greek heroes and gods. A few are elegantly furnished.

"The teacher teaches all subjects, and attends to character as well as intellect, using a sandal. In one of the pictures at Pompeii, probably copied from the Greek, we see a pupil supported upon the shoulders of another and held at his heels by a third, while the teacher flogs him."

Solely private schools? Teachers concentrating on character as well as intellect? Corporal punishment permitted?

Your thoughts, please.

Robby

Bubble
April 9, 2003 - 08:24 am
Discipline is a good thing. How else to learn limits and self control? It worked well enough on those from my generation. I feel sorry for the young ones in today's schooling system. I think they have a much harder time because they are always checking limits and how to behave on top of what they are learning.

georgehd
April 9, 2003 - 02:00 pm
My name is George and I am responding to Robbie's email to join the group. Since you are in the middle of an ongoing discussion, allow me a few days to catch up. I do not have the Durant books, so I cannot use them as references.

I do have twenty years of experience teaching mostly science in a relatively small "progressive" school in Baltimore. Since you are in the middle of a discussion on education, I might just join in.

Corporal punishment should be forbidden. There is no question in my mind about this topic. I use the little experience I have had training dogs in addition to my years teaching. The secret to training a dog is praise and reward for a job well done. Punishment usually does not work. I found the same principle worked with human beings. I never spanked my own children and they have grown into wonderful adults.

Children do test limits. "What can I get away with today" This is part of their learning process. The adult in the situation must provide limits and expectations. I found that children and I include teen agers, do respond well particularly when expectations are high and when they feel themselves respected by the adult.

Now I have gone and done what I said I would not do - jumped right in without reading previous posts.

robert b. iadeluca
April 9, 2003 - 02:27 pm
Welcome, George, and for a "jumper" you did marvelously well!! I'm sure that others here will have some comments regarding your remarks.

May I suggest that you click on to a half dozen of the previous postings just to get a feel of where we are. We are in the section of the volume entitled "The Morals and Manners of the Athenians." We touched a bit on the sub-section which Durant calls Childhood and now, as you can see, we are in the next sub-section called Education.

Take a look at the BROWN quote near the very top of the Heading which begins with the words "Four Elements..." Durant always follows his line of reasoning in that order. We covered economic and political and are now in the moral "element." Following that, of course, will be Knowledge and the Arts. I also suggest that each time you enter this discussion, you not scroll down too quickly past the Heading because I change the GREEN quotes periodically so that you can see where we are in the volume.

So here you are! And you are most welcome. You will see that we are truly a family here who joke around but also care for each other. We have participants from Israel, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and states across the nation. And now from the Cayman Islands.

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
April 9, 2003 - 02:38 pm
George, I assume you know that if you click on to our names, you will find out a bit about us.

Robby

Justin
April 9, 2003 - 03:58 pm
I am convinced that praise encourages improved deportment when children test limits. Lateness at school,for example, can be corrected by doling out daily pats on the back for other effort. Who would be late for a pat on the back? Corporal punishment has just the opposite effect. The child may come early but only out of fear and not because he sees the school as a place where he can do great things. Seventy years ago, the practice was to administer a ruler in appropriate places just as one did in Greece. I never found the method effective.

Justin
April 9, 2003 - 04:10 pm
George; Nice to have you with us. A science teacher from Baltimore, is just the right background to contribute to this forum. My background is in economics, mathematics, and art history and I have been happily reading and posting in this discussion for over a year. So step right in and share your views on Greece with us. I must admit the book helps but you can do it on a trial basis using the green quotes, as Robby suggested.

robert b. iadeluca
April 9, 2003 - 05:08 pm
Are we implying here that those brilliant people back there in the Cradle of Democracy impeded the educational process by using their method of flogging?

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
April 9, 2003 - 05:15 pm
Here is an EXCELLENT LINK on the subject of punishment in school from primitive tribes on through the various civilizations.

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
April 9, 2003 - 05:22 pm
Click HERE to learn how punishment can be successfully used.

Robby

Éloïse De Pelteau
April 9, 2003 - 06:53 pm
Georgehd, Welcome to this discussion. Be careful, it is addictive. I have been a participant for over a year, on, and off. I will be most interested in reading your comments.

Eloïse

georgehd
April 9, 2003 - 07:45 pm
Competition in education will produce the best results. I personally do not think so and as a teacher in a moderately progressive school I tried to keep competition out of the classroom. But that is not the American way nor it seems the Greek way. I believe that the best education is internally motivated. As a boy, I attended a semi military school where grade averages were worked out to two decimal places. I was at the top of the list for eleven years. But I did not receive the best education for me - I was motivated by a desire to please someone else and not myself.

As a teacher I ended up at a school that down played grades and competition in the classroom. While grades were given in High School because of college pressure, grades were not given in the lower years. I think that children can thrive in such an environment. Anxious parents often cannot.

I will be interested to see how you react to this post.

Malryn (Mal)
April 9, 2003 - 08:03 pm
I think publication of grades is not a good idea because one child who is slower than another, or who happens to be much better in math than art or vice versa, can feel very bad when he or she learns about the kid who has a 4.0 average in everything, and perhaps give up.

My grandson here (age 18) has been in advanced classes since he was in middle school, including college level classes in high school. He has worked like the devil since he entered school, and knows very well he's bright, though he never flaunts the fact. He just received a $5000 a year 4 year scholarship to the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and intends to major in math. He is not really musical or artistic (sadly, this grandmother thinks), but he did well in those classes because he worked so hard, and not because anyone ever slapped him with a ruler.

My education has been enhanced tonight by a show on Food TV. I learned that the reason gyros are called "heroes" is because that is a phonetic way of saying the Greek word. Oh, boy, do I love Greek food!

Mal

Justin
April 9, 2003 - 10:28 pm
Competition in elementary school probably discourages slower students. I think it should be avoided wherever possible at this level. However, students in high school may be old enough to cope without losing confidence. Students should be encouraged to compete with themselves by improving on previous scores. Comparison is redundant for the motivated student.

Bubble
April 10, 2003 - 01:36 am
When I said discipline was necessary, I did not mean corporal punishment. But the guidance to keep on trying and learning even when it seemed hard or un-interesting. It procures the frame work for a productive life later on. Or maybe it should be called an organized one?



George, I have always hated the competitive spirit in classes. The learning is done best when one has dedicated teachers who impart the love of knowledge and give the tools for attaining it oneself at our proper pace. I was lucky enough to have several such in highschool and I am still thankful to them today forty plus years later.



We have what is called two "open schools" here. They have a flexible curriculum, chose to learn the subjects they want be it academic, theoretical or practical. The students enter classrooms at will, sit for a literary dissertation, try a physics experiment or go to dismantle a computer.



I have seen some benefitting tremendously from this method and statistically these students have been the best officers ever in the army after they left highschool. Others, less bright students, have lost the chance to gain a good basis of values and knowledge: they just have had a good time for a few years.



BTW, in the open school, the principal or director has nothing much to say: a panel of students is elected (on general election day) and rotated regularly to take all the decisions pertaining the school.



Mal, I think your grandson would have enjoyed and thrived there. My son too: in the regular school he went to, he was more on the wrong side of the door than in the classroom, only because of the strict rules and competition.
Bubble

3kings
April 10, 2003 - 02:08 am
My first two years in High School was during the war. Our teacher for Maths and Physics was an old man called back from retirement. He was about 70, and totally uninterested in teaching. His disinterest left me not interested either.

For my 3rd year, I had a much younger man, who had been invalided home from duty in Europe. His effect on me was immense. He stuck to the curriculum, but gave us also little pieces of excitement, by bringing in little asides about Special Relativity, Spacetime, Cantorian arithmetic, Atomic physics and rocket dynamics etc.

In short, he made his teaching alive and interesting. I used to actively extend my homework, and in that year, recovered all that I had missed in the preceding two. Clearly, teaching is an art, and that guy sure had it. And yet, strangely, there were other kids on whom he had very little influence.

The first week of the year, he caned a couple of the kids, and then having established who was in charge, he never had to resort to physical punishment again. I can remember he made a joke of it. "Well lads, this is going to hurt you, far more than it does me" Whack!--- Trevor

Bubble
April 10, 2003 - 03:01 am
Trevor, could it be said that it is not as important WHAT is taught, than HOW it is taught?



My Latin teacher gave me the avidity to know more about ancient cultures and their beliefs. My Lit teacher made me curious about languages, the music of words and the richness of one's expressions. He was huge in the various meanings of the word. He also had a special talent with his voice, he could use it softly and high pitched as a shy maid would, and he could have made the walls of Jericho thumble down. They both were very strict disciplinarians on the first month after the summer vacations. Bubble

robert b. iadeluca
April 10, 2003 - 04:09 am
Durant continues:--

"The curriculum has three divisions -- writing, music, and gymnastics. Eager modernists will add, in Aristotle's day, drawing and painting. Writing includes reading and arithmetic, which uses letters for numbers.

"Everyone learns to play the lyre, and much of the material of instruction is put into poetical and musical forms. No time is spent in acquiring any foreign language, much less a dead one, but great care is taken in learning the correct usage of the mother tongue.

"Gymnastics are taught chiefly in the gymnasium and the palaestra, and no one is considred educated who has not learned to wrestle, swim, and use the bow and the sling."

Any comments on how we stand today regarding these items? What is the physical condition of our youth today? How well do our youth speak their mother tongue? Can everyone play a musical instrument? Or are any of these subjects necessary?

Robby

Bubble
April 10, 2003 - 04:39 am
These days I spend more time, on the net, trying to guess the spelling of teenagers (more those from UK than the US based)writing in their mother tongue that deploring the shallowness of contents. And the sentence: 'I am bored' is a leitmotive.

Éloïse De Pelteau
April 10, 2003 - 05:18 am
George, "I believe that the best education is internally motivated." and it seems to me to be the only motivation that can lead to effective learning. Otherwise why would I bother to still be going to school at my age?

Robby, Now I know why in Montreal we had "La Palestre Nationale". I was always wondering why they called it "Palestre".

While learning their languages, the Greeks spent years perfecting it and perhaps that is why they did not have time to learn other languages. If other nations used Greek as a base for their own language I am almost certain that it was because Greek words and grammar could translate thought better than any other language.

Languages fascinate me in many aspects and one of them is for the sound of it. I am partial to French because of its musicality and not only because it is my mother tongue.

Eloïse

Bubble
April 10, 2003 - 05:44 am
Eloise. it is said that French is the language of men but Italian is the language of angels, it is so musical!

Éloïse De Pelteau
April 10, 2003 - 06:17 am
Bubble, hearing Italians speak here in Montreal and in Italy, I totally agree that it is the most musical language especially for opera. I didn't know that about angels? did you Robby?

robert b. iadeluca
April 10, 2003 - 08:51 am
Eloise:--Being an angel due to my heritage, it was difficult for me to stand aside and look at myself objectively.

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
April 10, 2003 - 09:06 am
"Outside of Sparta, girls take no part in public gymnastics. They are taught by their mothers or nurses to read and write and reckon, to spin and weave and embroider, to dance and sing and play some instrument. A few Greek women are well educated, but these are mostly hetairai. For respectable ladies there is no secondary education, until Aspasia lures a few of them into rhetoric and philosophy.

"Higher education for men is provided by professional rhetors and sophists, who offer instruction in oratory, science, philosophy, and history. These independent teachers engage lecture halls near the gymnasium or palsestra, and constitute together a scattered university for pre-Platonic Athens.

"Only the prosperous can study under them, for they charge high fees. Ambitious youths work by night in mill or field in order to be able to attend by day the classes of these nomadic professors."

So if I understand this correctly, disreputable women can obtain a respectable education, but respectable women can not.

Robby

kiwi lady
April 10, 2003 - 09:10 am
I have much to say about education. Firstly education today should begin in the home from the time a baby can focus its eyes on a picture book. There is much you can do at home to prepare your child to enter a learning environment. Reading to a preschooler is essential. In fact we have a program in place here called Parents as first teachers. This mentors parents to help to educate their pre schoolers. Too many parents involved in a too frantic world use the TV as a babysitter. As an aside we took the TV out of the house for several years while the kids were 11-15. This helped the kids to develop a pattern of homework discipline increased conversation and discussion of world affairs and joint reading of the newspapers. More board games were played as entertainment and there was a great enjoyment of arts and crafts as an entertainment. I think the family became closer during these years. By age 15 we expected the children to have developed some sort of self discipline as regards assignments and study. Parents should get involved in their kids education. For instance Graham could not read when he came to live with us at age 7. I borrowed a set of ladybird learn to read books - a phonetic based series and spent 20 mins a day immediately I got in from work with him doing reading. It only took about 6mths to get him reading fluently. It was somewhat hair raising as the first few lessons consisted of Graham screaming and kicking his heels. Graham we discovered is a perfectionist. If he could not do anything perfectly immediately he would refuse to try again. We have discovered his four year old son is the same. Some counselling from us about practice makes perfect and patience is rewarded was necessary. I say do not rely on the school system absolutely if we see something lacking we should step in and do the job ourselves as parents.

More about todays schools in my next post. I am too tired now as I am up in the small hours and need to go and get some sleep.

Carolyn

robert b. iadeluca
April 10, 2003 - 09:15 am
Welcome, back, Carolyn! Always good to hear your comments. I'm sure there will be reactions from others here.

Robby

georgehd
April 10, 2003 - 01:11 pm
Boy you guys (and gals) post fast and furious. Because the topic is so interesting to me and so important to the world, I need to take some time to digest the last three pages of posts. I'll be back. Robby - you were correct, this is quite a group.!!

Is there anyway to print out just the posts?

kiwi lady
April 10, 2003 - 02:16 pm
There is something else I would like to say not about education it goes back to the previous topic. As I watch the War in Iraq, I hear the spin on both sides I really believe nothing has changed and we are no more civilized than the Romans. This makes me heartsick.

Carolyn

Malryn (Mal)
April 10, 2003 - 02:23 pm
My brother and I are the first generation of our family to be fortunate enough to be educated beyond high school, my brother to the University of New Hampshire through the ROTC and I on a scholarship to one of the Seven Sisters women's colleges, the female academic equivalent of Harvard or Yale. I also studied music for four years at the New England Conservatory of Music in Boston on a scholarship before I entered college.

My former husband's father worked his way through Bowdoin College, became a teacher and later the principal of an elementary school and finally the superintendent of schools in the Massachusetts city where I grew up. He took his master's degree at Harvard and made sure his two sons and his grandchildren knew the importance of education.

My husband worked for and received a Ph.D. in inorganic chemistry. Later he did post graduate work in physics at Duke University and did further study at Harvard.

With this background, we emphasized education for our three kids. They were read to from a very early age.

Since the dinner table conversation in our family was anything but ordinary, our children were daily exposed to science and math from my husband and to music and art from me.

Their father also is an accomplished pianist. Our dinner guests often were scientists who played music, and it was common for those dinners to be followed by chamber music played by my former husband and the guests.

Our kids learned something about opera from me, since I was a singer as well as a classical pianist, and they stood around the piano singing while I played all kinds of jazz, which was and is my happy indulgence.

All three of them went into their father's laboratory wherever it was and listened to him explain something about experimental work he was doing at the time. They also heard conversation about politics, both local and worldwide, at the dinner table, often from guests who were residents of other countries besides the United States.

It was in no way an ordinary household, and my three grown children are full of trivial and not so trivial information about many different things. My second son and my daughter both are college graduates. Dorian, my daughter, is Phi Beta Kappa. My elder son was too ill to finish working for a degree.

At age 69 I put my first web page on the web, knowing nothing about what I was doing. I have continued that work and learn more about computers and what is possible to do with them as far as art and technology are concerned all the time.

To me and my family, education is a process that only ends the day you die.

I just remembered something. When I was a Cub Scout den mother, I knew nothing about scouting, tying knots, or anything like that, so I took my troop on excursions. We went to a bank where we were allowed to go in the room where there was a room-sized computer, and they learned about that. I took them to an art museum and taught them something about art, and I wrote a musical show for them which the boys performed at a very large gathering of other troops. I wonder if any of them -- grown men and fathers by now -- remember anything about that?

Mal

kiwi lady
April 10, 2003 - 02:38 pm
When I went to school competition was politically correct. We were streamed from age 11 and had two sets of exams a year and we were all fiercely competitive. I can remember crying for a day because I only came 6th in the top class overall instead of first. I had not taken into account the class consisted of children from four contributing schools and I had come first the year before because the class was not streamed.

The interesting thing about competition is that it produced a higher percentage of literacy than we have today. Children are not told in school they are failing. They are not kept back. I see no sense in this politically correct system. It has ended up that kids are hitting University with a competency level in English of a 13yr old. This means taking remedial English classes.Now these are not dumb kids they may be Maths and Science wizards but they still need to be competent in English to produce their assignments.

Life is full of competition - this is today's world and I think we could better prepare our children for life by allowing competition in education.

Carolyn

I don't know about your school system but this is what has been happening in ours.

robert b. iadeluca
April 10, 2003 - 05:42 pm
George:--To print out just a post -- high light the post(s) -- hit "control C" -- go up to the upper left corner and hit "file" -- go down the list of choices and hit "print" -- wait for the dialogue box and hit "selection" -- then hit "OK."

robert b. iadeluca
April 10, 2003 - 06:00 pm
"Boys are expected to pay special attention to physical exercises, as fitting them in some measure for the tasks of war. Even their sports give them indirectly a military preparation. They run, leap, wrestle, hunt, drive chariots, and hurl the javelin.

"At eighteen they enter upon the second of the four stages of Athenian life (pais, ephebos, aner, geron - child, youth, man, elder), and are enrolled into the ranks of Athens' soldier youth, the epheboi. Under moderators chosen by the leaders of their tribes they are trained for two years in the duties of citizenship and war. They live and eat together, wear an impressive uniform, and submit to moral supervision night and day.

"They organize themselves democratically on the model of the city, meet in assembly, pass resoloutions, and erect laws for their own governance. They have archon, strategoi, and judges.

"At nineteen they are assigned to garrison the frontier, and are entrusted for two years with the protection of the city against attack from without and disorder within. Solemnly, in the presence of the Council of Five Hundred, with hands stretched over the altar in the temple of Agraulos, they take the oath of the young men of Athens."

Does anyone see this as similar to Universal Military Training -- the draft?

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
April 10, 2003 - 06:23 pm
Part of it sounds like the training, discipline, drill and rigmarole my brother went through in the ROTC.

Mal

kiwi lady
April 10, 2003 - 06:53 pm
Although I am intensely anti war I am for some sort of military based training for the simple reason I think it instils good self discipline. I wish they would use a similar system for a school for juvenile offenders here. They did have an experimental program for unemployed youth and then had a documentary about the program. It was amazing how these kids grew - both boys and girls. They came out the program with self esteem and confidence and they even looked different in their appearance. I think it is a great pity we don't have some sort of compulsory training now. It could encompass humanitarian service if some young people felt they did not want to use weaponry.

Carolyn

Justin
April 11, 2003 - 12:23 am
Learning comes when the benefits of education are recognizable and the student is motivated because the benefits are as desirable as ice cream. If parents keep the carrot up in front motivation will not waver. Constant reinforcement is necessary to get students over the rough spots. Confidence building conversations are required. Lots of back patting goes a long way. Little assignments that when achieved become an opportunity for "Well Done's.

The parents must be compatible and good role models. Otherwise the kid must do it on his own. None of this "The kid has good stuff in him so he will do it." Good parents put the good stuff in him on a daily basis by example and hard work ( not at the office but with the student). Good parents make decisions with the kids present and ask their opinions. All of this is education.

Bubble
April 11, 2003 - 12:58 am
Justin, it is a vicious circle. I was encouraged to have high grades but scolded if not. We never had "talks" other than about improving grades or how selfish and/or ungrateful one was; it was unthinkable to ask a kid's opinion on anything even on buying clothes.



I had the greatest difficulties with my own children in not following that example because i didn't know how to "talk" about serious issues in the family. Strangely enough my daughter and her grand ma did have those hour long soul talks. Bubble

robert b. iadeluca
April 11, 2003 - 04:06 am
"Strangely enough my daughter and her grand ma did have those hour long soul talks."

I have often heard that comment about children finding it difficult to talk to their parents but having "long soul talks" with a grandparent. Any comments regarding that?

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
April 11, 2003 - 04:15 am
Durant continues:--

"Such is the education -- eked out by lessons learned in the home and in the street -- that produces the Athenian citizen. It is an excellent combination of physical and mental, moral and esthetic training, of supervision in youth with freedom in maturity. And in its heyday it turns out young men as fine as any in history.

"After Pericles theory grows and beclouds practice. Philosophers debate the goals and methods of education -- whether the teacher should aim chiefly at intellectual development or at moral character, chiefly at practical ability or the promotion of abstract science.

"When Aristippus is asked in what way the educated are superior to the untutored he answers, 'as broken horses are to the unbroken.' Aristotle to the same question replies, 'as the living are to the dead.' At least, adds Aristippus, 'If the pupil derives no other good, he will not, when he attends the theater, be one stone upon another.'"

And so here we are, except for the electronic advantages we have, debating exactly the same topic that was of interest to Aristotle and others. 2,500 years have passed. Are today's citizens "more educated" than those Athenian citizens so far far away in time?

Robby

Éloïse De Pelteau
April 11, 2003 - 04:32 am
George you said: "I was at the top of the list for eleven years. But I did not receive the best education for me - I was motivated by a desire to please someone else and not myself.

I don't quite understand this because you were at the top of the class for 11 years and you succeeded. I guess you are saying that you would have liked to do something else? another career?

I have to admit that I am envious when someone receives, thanks to generous parents, an education and are encouraged, patted on the back, housed, fed, clothed and their parent's only reward in the end is that their children are educated.

That was not my case. Both my parents had a total of 4 years of schooling on the farm in Quebec. The depression had thrown the 8 of us at very bottom of the social ladder, to be more exact, we were dirt poor. Not just poor (like the others) but shivering, hungry, moving every year for 7 years poor. Having a mother who was a 'saint' she supplemented that lacking education, through strict discipline, she tough us geography, English, music, sewing, good manners and resourcefulness, she motivated us to seek learning in spite of financial constraints. Except for one who received his Ph.D. thanks to the Jesuits - provided he stayed with them - we had to start working by the age of 14, give our pay home and be respectful. We never had junk food, new clothes, never went to the park, couldn't play downstairs (rough neighborhood). Yet, all 6 of us did get an education.

Getting back to Greece, Their education methods resulted in giving the world unequaled treasures that we are still benefiting from 2500 years afterwards. We are seeing some of the bad side of that, but I don't think they coddled their children like we do. We were definitely not coddled at home.

Eloïse

robert b. iadeluca
April 11, 2003 - 05:01 am
I visit a number of discussion groups in Senior Net and on some of them the participants tell of personal experiences. But I know of no other SN forum where the participants share so deeply and personally as in this one. Words here come from the heart and this, in my opinion, is the lifeblood of this discussion group. Thank you!!

Robby

Bubble
April 11, 2003 - 05:42 am
Your doigte, Robby...

kiwi lady
April 11, 2003 - 06:45 am
Robby besides our passion for politics we also do some real soul sharing down in the Australia Folder at times. I do agree though there has been some real sharing here.

Carolyn

Malryn (Mal)
April 11, 2003 - 07:22 am

And look at you now, Eloise, the matriarch of a fine family and working for a college degree, carrying on the tradition of your mother.

Like Eloise, my parents were not educated. My father didn't go beyond the sixth grade if he finished that, and my mother did not graduate from high school.

My 27 year old granddaughter, Megan, and I were very close for a while. She is the daughter of a mother who lived in a kind of a fantasy world of riches and sugarplums nobody gave to her after she left her well-to-do parents' home. Meg's mother tried to commit suicide several times. Megan's father (my elder son) is an alcoholic and was brain-injured in a terrible accident which left him subject to psychotic episodes. Before Megan came to me for help, I helped and supported her father for five years while I was living in Florida.

Several years ago Meg left college at the urging of my other son who knew I'd help her. When she came here to North Carolina, she was addicted to drugs and alcohol. I found an apartment for her and me and got her into AA and shoved her into a job she was afraid to try. As Robby knows, I was equipped to help this 19 year old. I understood her addiction problems; didn't put up with any nonsense and gave her as much love as I could.

Meg is a beautiful young woman, tall and slender, artistic and sad, the kind of person I wanted to comfort and hug. Instead, I pushed her out on Main Street where life is hard, as a very kind old Yankee did to me once, and I made a home for her and me.

Meggie and I talked about art and music, men, money, addiction, everything, and laughed a lot together. Along with serious talk about these things and the books we read, we explored web sites and listened to jazz together. I remember one night when we went into a transvestite site featuring Lady Chablis of Midnight in the Garden of Evil fame and exclaimed about how beautiful some of those men were. This led to quite a conversation about many things.

I'd like to say Megan did fine from then on, but she didn't. She was fine for a few years; then lapsed and left this area. I am told that on her own she has gone back into AA and has regained her sobriety and stability; has a job and is doing quite well. I miss her very much because there's a special bond between us neither one of us has had before, that I guess could only come between a grandmother and granddaughter, who in many ways are a lot alike.

By the way, my long post yesterday was meant to point out that much education comes away from school. I know mine has.

Mal

georgehd
April 11, 2003 - 09:18 am
Eloise, it will be hard for me to explain exactly what I meant except to say that I was a teacher pleaser. I did not stray from the straight and narrow and in that sense I believe in looking back at my education, that I missed a great deal. And yes, I did initially choose an incorrect career path. Now do not get all weepy eyed and feel sorry for me - I have led an absolutely wonderful life.

I want to get back to education, even though Robby wants us to move on. As "older adults" we constantly need reminding that the education that we remember is probably not repeatable today. There are far more children in school and it is likely that most of us never had classes of 25 to 35 students. We also did not have the distraction of TV, compact discs, teen age radio, malls, constant advertising and yes the threat of war (we had a war that affected us very differently -IMO).

Most of the teachers I had were a dedicated group with years of experience who got satisfaction from their work. Society does not reward the teaching profession monetarily and I wonder (I do not know) whether the teachers of today's youth have the subject matter and philosophical background that makes for a really good teacher. Twenty years ago, I was not impressed with the graduates of teacher colleges.

Having said that, I am very impressed by the subject matter and the teachers of my grandchildren. Two sets of children are in private school and one set is in public school in California. Unfortunately the situation in public schools in large urban centers in the US is not good (a London teacher reports similar conditions in London). Political leaders do not know how to solve these urban educational problems and I am not sure that the educators involved have given the kind of enlightened leadership that is required to make progress. Parents, for the most part, are simply too tired and too distracted by the need to make a living, to become fully engaged in the educational process. And I see no leadership coming from Washington.

Having gone to an all male school for twelve years and having taught in a coed school for twenty years, I firmly believe in coed education. I also believe that young people need to be exposed to a wide variety of experiences that include the arts and sports. Some states are cutting back or eliminating the arts and athletics because of budgetary contraints - I think that this is a terrible idea. Success needs to be encouraged and success is not the same for every individual in every field.

I liked Robby's post 177 because it spoke of a well rounded approach to education in Greek times. The emphasis on the mother tongue was interesting. When I taught, my principal had a principle - every teacher was a teacher of English. No matter what the subject matter. Speaking and writing were important in every subject area.

I am sure that all of you are aware obesity in the US is now an epidemic and it is affecting young people. Adult diabetes is being seen at earlier ages. Reducing physical education time does not help the situation. Nor does the inclusion of junk food in many school cafeterias help. Sorry for going on for so long; I will now reread Robby's latest post.

Post 183 - I had to look up hetairai. Disreputable women may have street smarts that surpass those of more refined ladies.

Malryn (Mal)
April 11, 2003 - 10:32 am


"The Cyrenaic School of Philosophy, so called from the city of Cyrene, in which it was founded, flourished from about 400 to about 300 B.C., and had for its most distinctive tenet Hedonism, or the doctrine that pleasure is the chief good. The school is generally said to derive its doctrines from Socrates on the one hand and from the sophist, Protagoras, on the other. From Socrates, by a perversion of the doctrine that happiness is the chief good, it derived the doctrine of the supremacy of pleasure, while from Protagoras it derived its relativistic theory of knowledge.

"Aristippus (flourished c. 400 B.C.) was the founder of the school, and counted among his followers his daughter Arete and his grandson Aristippus the Younger. The Cyrenaics started their philosophical inquiry by agreeing with Protagoras that all knowledge is relative. That is true, they said, which seems to be true; of things in themselves we can know nothing. From this they were led to maintain that we can know only our feelings, or the impression which things produce upon us.

"Transferring this theory of knowledge to the discussion of the problem of conduct, and assuming, as has been said, the Socratic doctrine that the chief aim of conduct is happiness, they concluded that happiness is to be attained by the production of pleasurable feelings and the avoidance of painful ones. Pleasure, therefore, is the chief aim in life. The good man is he who obtains or strives to obtain the maximum of pleasure and the minimum of pain. Virtue is not good in itself; it is good only as a means to obtain pleasure.

"This last point raises the question: What did the Cyrenaics really mean by pleasure? They were certainly sensists, yet it is not entirely certain that by pleasure they meant mere sensuous pleasure. They speak of a hierarchy of pleasures, in which the pleasures of the body are subordinated to virtue, culture, knowledge, artistic enjoyment, which belong to the higher nature of man. Again, some of the later Cyrenaics reduced pleasure to a mere negative state, painlessness; and others, later still, substituted for pleasure 'cheerfulness and indifference'. The truth seems to be that in this, as in many other instances, sensism was satisfied with a superficial and loosely-jointed system. There was no consistency in the Cyrenaic theory of conduct; probably none was looked for. Indeed, in spite of the example of the founders of the school, the later Cyrenaics fell far below the level of what was expected from philosophers, even in Greece, and their doctrine came to be merely a set of maxims to justify the careless manner of living of men whose chief aim in life was a pleasant time."

MORE HERE

kiwi lady
April 11, 2003 - 12:34 pm
I had children at both coed and segregated schools. I transferred them all to single sex schools at high school they did better. They could still socialise with the opposite sex at weekends etc. The two single sex schools here in the West have very good academic and sporting records. The two highest achieving schools in Auckland are single sex schools.

Carolyn

kiwi lady
April 11, 2003 - 12:37 pm
Could the the Philosophy above as posted by Mal have contributed to the downfall of their civilization? I somehow think it did.

Carolyn

georgehd
April 11, 2003 - 01:19 pm
I note that the entire set of Durant's books is available and wonder if any of you have read other volumes. Is it helpful to have the volume about Greece for this discussion?

Malryn (Mal)
April 11, 2003 - 02:07 pm

I firmly believe in coeducational schools. Having spent four years in one of them I think single sex schools are unnatural. The young women I knew at Smith spent more time thinking and talking about the opposite sex and seeking them out than studying sometimes, and the same was true for males at Amherst, Williams, Harvard, Yale and Brown, which were all male schools when I was in college. Life outside those walls is not a single sex arena.

I also firmly believe in seeking what is pleasurable in life because I don't like the alternative. Life will provide plenty of that painful alternative without our helping it out. As stated in the quote I posted, the Ancient Greeks had different definitions of pleasure from painlessness to cheerfulness to indifference. I'm not sure this Cyrenaic philosophy was as widespread as some of the others.

Mal

Malryn (Mal)
April 11, 2003 - 02:13 pm

George, like some others, I have been in this Story of Civilization discussion since it first began over a year ago, and have had the two books we've discussed so far. Though Robby types out and posts direct quotes here from the books, I found in the discussion of Volume I, Our Oriental Heritage, and now with Volume II, Life of Greece, that it is helpful to have the books in order to fill in the gaps between the posted quotes, plus the fact that the illustrations of artwork and architecture in the books are marvelous.

Mal

Justin
April 11, 2003 - 02:58 pm
The books help.

Justin
April 11, 2003 - 03:27 pm
The Cyrenaics combined the desire for pleasure with the concepts of Protagorus the sophist. P was a guy who thought that truth is relative and that observable things exist only because we give words to them. P thought that absolute truth is an impossibility. Things are not black and white. Things are gray, he said. Truth can be measured with probability. There is no absolute certainty only certainty with degrees of freedom. P. connected to the pleasure bent boys when he said "the absolute measure of good in anything is in its relative utility to one".

Another interesting thought that comes from Protagorus and one that we can profess as well is that "all religions are social conventions useful to good order". Certainly we have seen religion so used in many of the societies we have seen in Civilization.

Justin
April 11, 2003 - 04:03 pm
George: Hetairai were women with excellent social skills and more education than any other women in Greece. Some consorted with Socrates, Aristotle, and Plato. They taught, and were taught by the leading philosophers of Greece. Hetairai have the social skills of Geisha and the knowledge of philosophers and other learned Greek males. We are talking about exceptional women not gals with street smarts.

robert b. iadeluca
April 11, 2003 - 04:30 pm
George:--Concerning your question about obtaining all the volumes in the set --

When we completed Our Oriental Heritage, I asked the gang for their wishes and unanimously they wanted to go on to The Life of Greece. So we took a one month breather and then moved on. Now everyone is talking as if our going on to "Caesar and Christ" is a fait accompli. So I guess it is. I am just the poor Discussion Leader who throws in a question or remark now and then. The participants run the show.

For your information, George, we began The Story of Civilization (Our Oriental Heritage) on November 1, 2001 and had over 7000 postings on that topic. So far in The Life of Greece we have had over 3000 postings. Prior to all that most of the participants here took part in deTocqueville's "Democracy in America" where we had over 7000 postings.

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
April 11, 2003 - 04:49 pm
Durant continues:--

"The citizens of Athens, in the fifth century, are men of medium height, vigorous, bearded, and not all as handsome as Pheidias' horsemen. The ladies of the vases are graceful, and those of the stelae have a dignified loveliness, and those molded by the sculptors are supremely beautiful. But the actual ladies of Athens, limited in their mental development by an almost Oriental seclusion, are at best as pretty as their Near Eastern sisters, but no more.

"Greek women, like others, find their figures a little short of perfection. They lengthen them with high cork soles on their shoes, pad out deficiencies with wadding, compress abundances with lacing, and support the breasts with a cloth brassiere."

Here again is a reminder that Ancient Greece was still under the Oriental influence. As for high heel shoes, corsets, and brassieres, I am out of my depth here and, hopefully being no fool, will not tread where angels do.

Robby

Justin
April 11, 2003 - 09:44 pm
Robby: You're too modest. I thought you said you were an angel a couple of posts back.

Bubble
April 12, 2003 - 01:05 am
I have the impression that past their 20s, the Greek ladies, as the southern Italians, get to be shortish, round hipped and have an impressively ... mmmmm... "stable assise". The Greek profile is famous too. Remember La Callas?


As for their undies, the fashion has changed much all over the world since Durant wrote his commentaries.

robert b. iadeluca
April 12, 2003 - 03:30 am
"The hair of the Greeks is usually dark. Blones are exceptional, and much admired. Many women, and some men, dye their hair to make it blonde, or to conceal the grayness of age. Both sexes use oils to help the growth of the hair and to protect it against the sun. The women, and again some men, add perfumes to oil.

"Both sexes, in the sixth century, wear the hair long, usually bound in braids around or behind the head. In the fifth century the women vary their coiffure by knotting the hair low on the nape of the neck, or letting it fall over the shoulders, or around the neck and upon the breast. The laides like to bind their hair with gay ribbons, and to adorn these with a jewel on the forehead.

"After Marathon the men begin to cut their hair. After Alexander they will shave their mustaches and beards with sickle-shaped razors of iron. The beard is neatly trimmed, usually in a point.

"The barber not only cuts the hair and shaves or trims the beard, but he manicures his customer and otherwise polishes him up for presentation. When he has finished he offers him a mirror in the most modern style. The barber has his shop, which is a center for the 'wineless symposia' (as Theophrastus calls them) of the local gossips and gadflies. He often works outside under the sky. He is garrulous by profession. When one of his kind asks King Archelaus of Macedon how he would like to have his hair cut, the king answers, 'In silence.'

"The women also shave here and there, using razors or depilatories of arsenic and lime."

Anything here ring a bell?

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
April 12, 2003 - 05:42 am

What Ancient Greek women wore is similar to an undergarment which was worn in the West in the 20's and part of the 30's that was called a bandeau.

My daughter has told me that the younger generation is excited about a newfangled piece of equipment called a girdle. I remember when I was young all of us slender, slim things wore girdles to tighten up anything that resembled the slightest bulge of fat, of which we had very little.

Uplift bras were the rage in the 40's. We had to have them so we'd look like the greatest sweater girl of them all, Lana Turner. Today it's either no bra at all or a terrible contrivance called the underwire bra. Then, of course, there's the Wonder Bra.

We females also wore big, thick shoulder pads so we'd look broad-shouldered and military during The War.

As for Durant's description of Greek women's makeup, etc., it reminds me of what we read about Ancient Egypt and Babylonia, though kohl (often powdered antimony sulfide) has been replaced by eye shadow in every shade and color you can name.

Dying one's hair is no longer a sin, and old white-haired ladies don't have to put bluing in their rinse water any more. I'm old-fashioned and still don't think pink, green and purple are great hair colors.

Vanity, thy name is . . .

So Greek men began to have haircuts. I guess there are still what we in Massachusetts called "Bahbah" Shops with a red and white bahbah pole in front. What was once beauty shops are now called unisex hair salons, and hairdressers are "hair stylists". I made the terrible mistake once of calling the guy who cut my hair a barber. He continued to feel insulted even after I told him the word, "barber", came from the Latin word, "barba", meaning beard. Some people just don't have any sense of humor.

Mal

Bubble
April 12, 2003 - 06:29 am
Khol is still very much used in Moslem countries. In Egypt as in the arab part of Israel it is said to be a good antiseptic against eye diseases caused by flies.

Malryn (Mal)
April 12, 2003 - 06:34 am
Yes, Bubble, Eloise once posted that she uses kohl for her eyes.

Mal

Malryn (Mal)
April 12, 2003 - 07:10 am

Greek education: Sport without clothes, an article

Éloïse De Pelteau
April 12, 2003 - 07:46 am
The type I use is named Kajal. It cannot be found here, someone brought it from India for my daughter who gave some to me. It stops eye irritation caused by too much reading. It is an antiseptic and made of heated camphre, not powder, but cream style, nothing else. It cannot be found in drug stores here or at a beauty product counter. In India, they have used it to protect their eyes from the bright sun and not only for religious ceremonies. It has a high therapeutic value. Good if it enhances the eyes, why not, but I wear it before going to bed and no one ever sees it. hahahaha.

georgehd
April 12, 2003 - 08:15 am
Mal, thanks for the post about nude athletes. Does anyone know why the woman's race (60m) was so much shorter than the man's (200m)?

The Durant description of hair style, the use of cosmetics, etc. was a surprise to me and got me to thinking about how these styles go in and out of fashion. Long hair, short hair, streaked hair, shaved heads, ear rings, nose rings, piercing various parts of the body, males wearing diamond studs - you name it, its probably been done. How do these customs arise? I suspect that it is teen age rebelion or its equivalent in olden times. The need to be different and to express one's individuality. It is interesting to look at old sitcoms on TV and I find myself thinking "Did we really look like that in those days?"

I hope that all of you have seen the picture The Hours. IMO the best picture of the year. The contrast in appearance of the three women (who lived at different times) was most interesting.

Here in Cayman (English protectorate), barristers and judges wear powdered wigs. Yes, even in the 90 degree heat. I think it looks pretty silly but that is the custom.

In China the Mao jacket became the jacket for the masses. And then it was adopted by western designers and became high fashion. What would Mao have thought?

I just looked at the top of the page and read "both sexes announce or disguise their income with jewelery". Part of the same pattern.

georgehd
April 12, 2003 - 09:06 am
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/13/books/review/13FERGUST.html?8bu

I thought that the above link might be of interest to some.

Éloïse De Pelteau
April 12, 2003 - 09:22 am
George, you should have been here when we discussed for over a year Tocqueville's "Democracy in America".

I like what Ferguson said in the NYT article that: "Just holding elections did not make them free". Freedom in a Democracy has high walls.

Eloïse

robert b. iadeluca
April 12, 2003 - 10:23 am
When I was a Boy Scout (I joined when I was 12 in 1932) and went to summer camp, our periods were one week long. Every day we swam nude except Sunday which was visiting day. We never thought it a bit unusual. When I was older I belonged for a while to a YMCA where we also swam nude.

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
April 12, 2003 - 10:31 am
"The well-to-do bathe once or twice daily, using a soap made of olive oil mixed with an alkali into a paste. Then they are anointed with fragrant essences. Comfortable homes have a paved bathroom in which stands a large marble basin, usually filled by hand. Sometimes water is brought by pipes and channels into the house and through the wall of the bathroom, where it spouts from a metal nozzle in the shape of an animal's head, and falls upon the floor of a small shower-bath enclosure, whence it runs out into the garden.

"Most people, unable to spare water for a bath, rub themselves with oil, and then scrape it off with a crescent-shaped strigil, as in Lysippus' Apoxyomenos. The Greek is not fastidiously clean. His hygiene is not so much a matter of indoor toilette as of absetemious diet and an active outdoor life.

"He seldom sits in closed homes, theaters, churches, or halls, rarely works in closed factories or shops. His drama, his worship, even his government, proceed under the sun. His simple clothing, which lets the air reach every part of his body, can be thrown aside with one swing of the arm for a bout of wrestling or a bath of sunshine."

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
April 12, 2003 - 02:19 pm
Click HERE to learn how to make olive oil soap.

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
April 12, 2003 - 02:26 pm
Here is a STRIGIL in use.

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
April 12, 2003 - 02:50 pm
This is off the topic of Greece and of course we will make an effort not to make political statements but those folks here who participated for months in OUR ORIENTAL HERITAGE will find this article in today's NY Times most relevant and most saddening.

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
April 12, 2003 - 02:54 pm
This is so sad and devastating that I couldn't finish reading the article. I wonder how many times this has happened in time of war? What a price we do pay.

Mal

robert b. iadeluca
April 12, 2003 - 03:13 pm
This is off the topic of Greece and of course we will make an effort not to make political statements but those folks here who participated for months in OUR ORIENTAL HERITAGE will find this article in today's NY Times most relevant and most saddening.

Robby

moxiect
April 12, 2003 - 03:22 pm
The article was very sad indeed, history plays a very important part in any nation.

Justin
April 12, 2003 - 03:31 pm
Art objects are always a casualty of war. The damage to medieval cathedrals in France after WW1 was severe. The Dresden fire bombing left little of art value in the city undestroyed. Now in the cradle of civilization, the history of the civilized world is destroyed. In WW11, in Europe, garrison troops including military government personnel with art historians and conservators, followed assault troops into cities to protect works of art. They were partially successful.

In the case of the Middle east intrusion, it looks like the war plan was not comprehensive enough. The one to blame I think is General Franks who was responsible for the plan approval. Looting and anarchy were certain to follow the collapse of the regime. Rumsfeld's response, that "freedom is untidy" was irresponsible. Bush will have to bear the animosity of the archeological world in addition to that animosity he already bears for all his other sins.

Sorry Robby, the pain of these archeological losses affects me too deeply, I guess, to ignore the issue.

kiwi lady
April 12, 2003 - 03:51 pm
It leaves me asking the question. Is it only possible with politically and religiously fragmentated societies to create order by ruling with fear. I think about the Balkans - the only time there was any sort of order was when Tito ruled with an iron fist. I see the chaos in Iraq and already the society dividing into different factions and wonder how they can become a united nation. I know this train of thought is against everything I believe in but it makes me really wonder.

Carolyn

robert b. iadeluca
April 13, 2003 - 03:37 am
Nice to hear from you again, Moxi. Yes, I believe all of us here are feeling this sadness whether we were part of the "Our Oriental Heritage" discussion or not.

Carolyn's question does make us pause and wonder. Can true order be created only through ruling by fear? How important is "order" when simultaneously thinking of freedom, liberty, privacy, and all those other concepts ordinarily connected with democracy? Did the Ancient Greeks have a democracy? Did they have liberty and privacy?

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
April 13, 2003 - 03:55 am
As indicated by the GREEN quotes above, Durant moves us on to the third element he mentions in the BROWN quotes which he says "constitutes civilization."

"The progress of the intellect has loosened many of the Athenians from their ethical traditions, and has turned them into almost immoral individuals. They have a high reputation for legal justice, but they are seldom altruistic to any but their children. Conscience rarely troubles them, and they never dream of loving their neighbors as themselves.

"Manners vary from class to class. In the dialogues of Plato life is graced with a charming courtesy, but in the comedies of Aristophanes there are no manners at all, and in public oratory personal abuse is relied upon as the very soul of eloquence. In such matters the Greeks have much to learn from the time-polished 'barbarians' of Egypt or Persia or Babylon.

"Salutation is cordial but simple. There is no bowing, for that seems to the proud citizens a vestige of monarchy. Handshaking is reserved for oaths or solemn farewells. Usually the greeting is merely Chaire -- 'Rejoice' -- followed, as elsewhere, by some brilliant remarks about the weather".

In this discussion we have often noted in prior Oriental civilizations how "religion" caused some sort of "harm" to the populace. Now we note that a "loosening of ethical traditions" cause them to be almost "immoral." We see, furthermore, that the "time polished" Orientals were more cordial and that these "new semi-Europeans" found no need for cordiality.

Putting aside today's thoughts of terrorism, is there more of a cordiality, are there more polished manners in today's Eastern civilizations than in our Western nations?

Robby

Hats
April 13, 2003 - 04:31 am
In the Eastern civilizations, there is a great respect for the elderly. In our Western culture, I think, there is a fear of aging. Being young, it seems, is the ideal time of life. Not literally, but metaphorically, we are still looking for the fountain of youth. If we fear aging, can we respect those who have aged? If the elderly fear aging, can they respect themselves?

Bubble
April 13, 2003 - 05:07 am
Shows of cordiality and greetings are more overt in the East, where there is a free use of embraces, kisses, hugs and other physical gestures even among men. It is common in Arab countries, it also is in Russia where men meeting in the street are seen mouth kissing. I witnessed that when we absorbed a wave of Russians immigrants. Bubble

Persian
April 13, 2003 - 07:48 am
Thanks for the invitation, Robby. Persian culture certainly enforces good manners in public; rude behavior would be definitely frowned upon. Children are taught "public manners" at an early age and are expected to adhere to them. As HATS mentioned, there is indeed great respect for elders, not only due to their age, but also as sources of whether behavior and language choices "really work." Young adults will often consult grandparents, rather than their own parents, if there is an issue of great sensitivity that needs to be addressed. The idea of "in your face" communication styles on a regular basis (quite common in the West), are not often witnessed in Persian culture unless there is an overwhelming surge of public emotion (i.e., the war in Iraq). However, tempers flare quickly (reminds me of the Irish!), but also cool down quickly. On the other hand, insults in front of witnesses (especially of a personal nature)may be forgiven in order to cool down a situation, but rarely forgotten. Persians have long memories.

BUBBLE - your comment about Russian men kissing is new to me. I've worked with many Russian immigrants who relocated to the USA, but I've never seen the type of greeting you describe.

Éloïse De Pelteau
April 13, 2003 - 05:55 pm
Bubble, I saw that on television also quite a few times.

robert b. iadeluca
April 13, 2003 - 08:23 pm
"Hospitality has lessened since Homeric days, for travel is a little more secure than then, and inns provide food and shelter for transients. Even so it remains an outstanding virtue of the Athenians. Strangers are welcomed though without introduction. If they come with letters from a common friend, they receive bed and board, and sometimes parting gifts. An invited guest is always privileged to bring an uninvited guest with him.

"This freedom of entry gives rise in time to a class of parasites -- parasitoi -- a word originally applied to the clergy who ate the 'corn left over' from the temple supplies. The well-to-do are generous givers in both public and private philanthropy. The practice as well as the word is Greek. Charity -- charitas, or love -- is also present. There are many institutions for the care of strangers, the sick, the poor, and the old.

"The government provides pensions for wounded soldiers, and brings up war orphans at the expense of the state. In the fourth century it will make payments to disabled workmen.

"In periods of drought, war, or other crisis, the state pays two obols (34 cents) a day to the needy, in addition to the regular fees for attendance at the Assembly, the courts, and the plays.

"There are the normal scandals. A speech of Lysias concerns a man who, though on public relief, has rich men for his friends, earns, money by his handicraft, and rides horses for recreation."

Robby

kiwi lady
April 13, 2003 - 10:00 pm
The Social Policies of this civilization were hugely ahead of their time. I guess every system is open to corruption but it must have been wonderful for the honest person to be cared for in time of need.

I have a new baby grandson born about 90 mins ago to my son Matthew and his wife Raelene. He was 9lbs and his name will be Taine (pronounced Tayne) Maxwell Stirling. I could not help thinking how lucky he was to be born here in this country in a comfortable high tech birth unit.

Carolyn

Justin
April 13, 2003 - 11:36 pm
A hearty welcome to Taine from California. I found it so much fun to be a grandparent I did it over and over again. Now my daughters are experiencing the fun grandparenting. Good luck to you and the proud parents. Nine pounds, that's big, isn't it.

Bubble
April 14, 2003 - 03:18 am
Best wishes for a rewarding and healthy life for Taine!


Athenian hospitality was the norm here when I first arrived in Israel. The house was always open, strangers welcomed to meals if they knocked at the door at that time, etc. Very often, seeing a tourist, map in hand, in town when I was starting to drive, I would ask where they needed to go and would explain the way or even take them there if it was far. One such person from Holland had copied a wrong address and since she had no other contact here, she stayed for a week at my home. Her money had run out.


But much has changed in the last fifteen years or so and we are more circumspect whom we invite in. It is a real pity. None the less, known people can drop in at any time without previous notice and are always received with a smile and a cuppa.
Bubble

robert b. iadeluca
April 14, 2003 - 04:40 am
"The chorus in Sophocles' Philoctates expresses the tenderest sympathy for the wounded and deserved soldier, then takes dvantage of his slumber to counsel Neoptolemus to betray him, steal his weapons, and leave him to his fate. Everyone complains that the Athenian retailers adulterate their goods, give short weight and short change despite the government inspectors, shift the fulcrum of their scales towards the measuring weights, and lie at every opportunity. The sausages, for example, are accused of being dogs.

"A comic dramatist calls the fishmongers 'assassins.' A gentler poet calls them 'burglars.' The politicians are not much better. There is hardly a man in Athenian public life that is not charged with crookedness. An honest man like Aristides is considered exciting news, almost a monstrosity. Even Diogenes' daytime lantern does not find another.

"Thucydides reports that men are more anxious to be called clever than honest, and suspect honesty of simplicity. It is an easy matter to find Greeks who will betray their country. Says PaPausanfias, 'At no time was Greece wanting in people afflicted with this itch for treason. Bribery is a popular way to political advancement, criminal impunity, diplomatic accomplishements. Pericles has large sums voted to him for secret uses, presumably for lubricating international negotiations.

"Morality is strictly tribal. Xenophon, in a treatise on education, frankly advises lying and robbery in dealing with the enemies of one's country. The Athenian envoys at Sparta in 432 defend their empire in plain terms. 'It has always been the law that the weaker should be subjct to the stronger. No one has ever allowed the cry for justice to hinder his ambition when he had a chance of gaining anything by might.'

"That somethng of this superiority to morals is an active ingredient in the Greek character appears in the readiness with which the Spartans agree with the Athenians on these mooted points of morals. Time and again truces are violated, solemn promises are broken, envoys are slain."

Do your own thing? Might over right?

Robby

Éloïse De Pelteau
April 14, 2003 - 06:17 am
"The sausages, for example, are accused of being dogs."
I will never again blame Americans of inventing 'hot dog' sausages.

Carolyn, I envy you. Congratulations on your new grandson Taine. I would love to hold a baby in my arms.

Justin, by-the-way, how is your grandson Aaron? I think that you enjoy grandfathering.

In the pillage in Baghdad, we can almost feel the anger, the revenge of an oppressed population after 30 years of dictatorship. How long would it have lasted had there been no intervention from the US?

Today we vote for the separatist party in Quebec or against it. Pray that this scourge will be eliminated once and for all so we can move ahead one big happy Canadian family and stop squabbling.

Eloïse

Malryn (Mal)
April 14, 2003 - 06:23 am
"Thucydides begins his history by explaining why he thinks that this (Peloponnesian) War is the greatest in which the Greeks were ever involved, even greater than the Trojan War and the Persian Wars. He then explains the principles upon which he evaluates evidence; his basic perspective is that human nature is the basic cause of historical events (Thucydides attributes no historical event to either the gods or to fate). He declares that his History will not be so entertaining as some others (such as Homer and Herodotus), but instead be a rational analysis that will be useful to those who wish to understand the way things happen, since events similar to those of the past will certainly recur in the future because human nature is unchanging. He analyzes the events of this War, he tells us, in order to enable future generations to understand the causes and progress of future wars, though not necessarily to prevent them.



"Next Thucydides explains the immediate causes of the War and gives an account of embassies and debates just before the War and the events of the first year. Then he inserts the Funeral Oration given by the Athenian leader Pericles over the bodies of those who had died fighting for Athens. Partly to make his audience feel that their sacrifices are worthwhile, Pericles explains the nature of Athens's greatness, her freedom and democracy.



"Thucydides sees how impressive human nature and life can be at their best, but also how rapidly both can degenerate under stress. The Melian Controversy gives the Athenian reasons for attacking the small island of Melos in 416, making them say bluntly that those who are powerful need have no regard for justice, human rights, or the gods. Compare this with the principles expressed in the Funeral Oration. Thucydides follows this with an account of the disastrous Athenian attempt to conquer the huge and resilient island of Sicily, a loss which, according to Thucydides, spelled the end of Athenian power."



MORE

Justin
April 14, 2003 - 12:07 pm
Eloise: Your are probably referring to my great grandson, Joshua, who was born about six weeks ago. Everyone says he looks like his grandpa. That's because he has a few wrinkles, I think. He doesn't seem to have any trouble telling people what he wants and when he wants it.

robert b. iadeluca
April 14, 2003 - 05:29 pm
I will be getting a new computer next week. In the meantime, pray that my current ailing machine holds out. If there are periods when I can't get into this discussion group, I know you will continue without a problem.

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
April 14, 2003 - 05:56 pm
Well, if you're away for a day or two, Robby . . .

Party!!!

Okay, folks, let's find out how those Ancient Greeks who didn't give a fig for morality -- the ones who'd put one over on you in a New York minute the second you turned your back -- threw a party! Shhhhhh, gang, don't mention this until Robby leaves the room to go to the computer shop.

I can't wait. I've found a million sites about this very same subject, having failed abysmally when it came to finding out about any other kind of morality!

Mal

Éloïse De Pelteau
April 14, 2003 - 06:22 pm
It is a great day for Canada. In Quebec we have elected a Liberal government today with a huge majority against the Separatists. I am extatic. Vive la démocratie.

Malryn (Mal)
April 14, 2003 - 08:23 pm
That's great news, Eloise. Oui. Vive la démocratie.

Below is a link I've been holding onto for quite a long time. It doesn't have much to do with morality, but I think it's fascinating.

Ancient Hellenic Geodetic System

Malryn (Mal)
April 14, 2003 - 08:32 pm

Greek and Roman Gods

robert b. iadeluca
April 15, 2003 - 04:21 am
"Custom and religion among the Greeks exercise a very modest restraint upon the victor in war. It is a regular matter, even in civil wars, to sack the conquered city, to finish off the wounded, to slaughter or enslave all unransomed prisoners and all captured noncombatants, to burn down the houses, the fruit trees, and the crops, to exterminate the live stock, and to destroy the seed for future sowings.

"At the opening of the Peloponnesian War the Spartans butcher as enemies all Greeks whom they find on the sea, whether allies of Athens or neutrals. At the battle of Aegospotami, which closes the war, the Spartans put to death three thousand Athenian prisoners -- almost the selected best of Athens' depleted citizenry.

"War of some kind -- of city against city or of class against class -- is a normal condition in Hellas. In this way the Greece that defeated the King of Kings turns upon itself. Greek meets Greek in a thousand battles, and in the course of a century after Marathon the most brilliant civilization in history consumes itself in a prolonged national suicide."

Once again, we turn to Voltaire's question in the Heading above -- and wonder.

Robby

Hats
April 15, 2003 - 05:24 am
Robby, all these weeks have passed, and I missed Voltaire's quote. Sorry. We have been discussing him in the Madame Bovary discussion.

Mal, I am enjoying your link about Greek and Roman Gods. Ares did have a small sword. How funny. You would think the God of War would carry a long and heavy sword.

Hats
April 15, 2003 - 05:29 am
Our tactics during the post war period seem quite different from the Greeks. In Iraq, we try to give aide to those who have suffered during the war. We are thinking about their incoming government. From what I understand here, the Greeks were cruel and uncaring to those whom they conquered.

I don't know if the Iraqis have water or electricity yet.

Malryn (Mal)
April 15, 2003 - 06:52 am


"ORDINARILY there is no comparison between the crimes of the great who are always ambitious, and the crimes of the people who always want, and can want only liberty and equality. These two sentiments, Liberty and Equality, do not lead direct to calumny, rapine, assassination, poisoning, the devastation of one's neighbours' lands, etc.; but ambitious might and the mania for power plunge into all these crimes whatever be the time, whatever be the place.



"Popular government is in itself, therefore, less iniquitous, less abominable than despotic power.



"The great vice of democracy is certainly not tyranny and cruelty: there have been mountain-dwelling republicans, savage, ferocious; but it is not the republican spirit that made them so, it is nature.



"The real vice of a civilized republic is in the Turkish fable of the dragon with many heads and the dragon with many tails. The many heads hurt each other, and the many tails obey a single head which wants to devour everything.



"Democracy seems suitable only to a very little country, and further it must be happily situated. Small though it be, it will make many mistakes, because it will be composed of men."

kiwi lady
April 15, 2003 - 10:30 am
I don't believe true democracy exists anywhere except in countries where the Govt listens to the majority of the people on important issues. We elect the rulers and then often they enact laws which are not supported by the majority or take action which is not supported by the majority. The problem is that administrations get into power then forget they are responsible to the people and go off on personal agendas. This is how I see it anyhow.

The Greek Civilization as described in the heading to us today seems chaotic.

Carolyn

Malryn (Mal)
April 15, 2003 - 11:22 am
A democracy can work only if there are checks and balances. There is a system of checks and balances built into the Constitution of the United States of America, which is a Republic as well as a democracy.

"The delegates built a 'check and balance' system into the Constitution. This system was built so that no one branch of our government could become too powerful. Each branch is controlled by the other two in several ways. For example, the president may veto a law passed by Congress. Congress can override that veto with a vote of two-thirds of both houses. Another example is that the Supreme Court may check Congress by declaring a law unconstitutional. The power is balanced by the fact that members of the Supreme Court are appointed by the president. Those appointments have to be approved by Congress."
Ancient Greece was a democracy, not a Republic. People were elected and laws were enacted by majority rule. To understand how the Ancient Athenian democracy worked, it seems necessary to study the Athenian Constitution as written by Aristotle to see what checks and balances there were.

Athenian Constitution

robert b. iadeluca
April 15, 2003 - 04:59 pm
"The nearness of the sea, the opportunities of trade, the freedom of economic and political life form the Athenian to an unprecedented excitability and resilience of temper and thought, a very fever of mind and sense.

"What a change from the Orient to Europe, from the drowsy southern regions to these intermediate states where winter is cold enough to invigorate without dulling, and summer warm enough to liberate without enfeebling body and soul!

"Here is faith in life and man, a zest of living never rivaled again until the Renaissance."

Ever so gradually Durant is moving us out of the Orient into Europe. And he gives us some hints as to what caused the change -- relating primarily to the change in the environment. Moving away from the inland deserts and plains to the open sea. Moving from the hot climate to the cooler areas.

In this and previous posts he talks constantly about the sharper intellect of the Greeks -- their zest of living and "fever of mind."

Are we seeing here a basic cause of the difference between the Eastern and Western civilizations -- their occupations? their philosophies? their attitudes? their religions or lack thereof?

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
April 16, 2003 - 07:57 am
I think the brilliance of Greek thought was caused, at least in part, by the lack of a restrictive religion. The number of, and variety of, philosophies would not have been possible if there had been one predominant religion which was full of "Thou shalts" and "Thou shalt nots".

Mal

georgehd
April 16, 2003 - 09:47 am
Some of you participated with me in the Life of Pi, Abraham and now Dante. I find Mal's post very intriguing as to the exact role of religion (or not) in ancient Greece. Since I do not have the book, I have nothing to refer to. I thought that the Greeks had many Gods and Godesses but do not know how these affected their daily lives. Was there any concept of heaven or hell?

I assume that we understand the life of the Greeks from a written record; how accurately does this record portray the life of the average Greek? Are we dealing with the upper strata of society only?

Malryn (Mal)
April 16, 2003 - 03:02 pm
George, on Page 200 and 201 Durant says:
"At first sight Greek religion does not seem to have been a major influence for morality. It was in origin a system of magic rather than of ethics and remained so, in large measure to the end; correct ritual receives more emphasis than good conduct, and the gods themselves, on Olympus or on earth, had not been exemplars of honesty, chastity, or gentleness. . . ."

"The purification ritual, however external in form, served as a stimulating symbol of moral hygiene. The gods gave a general, if vague and inconstant, support to vitue; they frowned upon wickedness, revenged themselves upon pride, protected the stranger and the suppliant, and lent their terror to the sanctity of oaths. . . ." "Through the worship of the dead, the generations were bound together in a stabilizing continuity of obligations, so that the family was not merely a couple and their children. . . ."

"Religion not only made the procreation of children a solemn duty to the dead, but encouraged it through the fear of the childless men that no posterity would inter him or tend his grave. . . ."

"Religion and patriotism were bound together in a thousand impressive rites. . . ."

"In all these ways Greek religion was used as a defense by the community and the race against the egoism of the individual man."

Malryn (Mal)
April 16, 2003 - 03:19 pm
I have realized that all of the quotes I posted about religion can be applied to the quoted statements about character in green at the top of this page.

Mal

robert b. iadeluca
April 16, 2003 - 04:14 pm
Here is ONE DEFINITION of "Character."

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
April 16, 2003 - 04:19 pm
Here are some WORDS RELATED TO CHARACTER from the dictionary.

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
April 17, 2003 - 04:21 am
I just read on the web that to understand the character of the Ancient Greeks, one should learn about the gods and the heroes.

15 Ancient Greek Heroes from Plutarch's Lives

robert b. iadeluca
April 17, 2003 - 04:21 am
"Out of this stimulating milieu comes courage, and an impulsiveness all the world away from the sophrosyne -- self-ceontrol -- which the philosophers vainly preach, or the Olympian serenity which young Winckelmann and old Goethe will foist upon the passionate and restless Greeks.

"Courage and temperance -- andreia, or manliness, and the meden agan, or 'nothing in excess' of the Delphic inscription -- are the rival mottoes of the Greek. He realizes the one frequently enough, but the other only in his peasants, philosophers, and saints.

"The average Athenian is a sensualist, but with a good conscience. He sees no sin in the pleasure of sense, and finds in them the readiest answer to the pessimism that darkens his meditative intervals. He loves wine, and is not ashamed to get drunk now and then. He loves women, in an almost innocently physical way, easily forgives himself for promiscuity, and does not look upon a lapse from virtue as an irremediable disaster. Nevertheless he dilutes two parts of wine with three of water, and considers repeated drunkenness an offense against good taste.

"Though he seldom practices moderation he sincerely worships it, and formulates more clearly than any other people in history the ideal of self-mastery."

Here is an interesting picture of the Ancient Greek. Any comments?

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
April 17, 2003 - 06:39 am
"The Athenians are too brilliant to be good, and scorn stupidity more than they abominate vice."

- - - Will Durant

robert b. iadeluca
April 17, 2003 - 10:29 am
"The Athenians are not all sages, and we must not picture their women as all lovely Nausicaas or stately Helens, or their men as combining the courage of Ajax with Nestor's wisdom. History has remembered the geniuses of Greece and has ignored her fools (except Nicias). Even our age may seem great when most of us are forgotten, and only our mountain peaks have escaped the obscurity of time.

"Discounting the pathos of distance, the average Athenian remains as subtle as an Oriental, as enamored of novelty as an American -- endlessly curious and perpetually mobile -- always preaching a Parmenidean calm and always tossed upon a Heracleitean sea.

"No people ever had a livelier fancy, or a readier tongue. Clear thought and clear expression seem divine things to the Athenian. He has no patience with learned obfuscation, and looks upon informed and intelligent conversation as the highest sport of civilization.

"The secret of the exuberance of Greek life and thought lies in this, that to the Greek, man is the measure of all things. The educated Athenian is in love with reason, and seldom doubts its ability to chart the universe.

The desire to know and understand is his noblest passion, and as immoderate as the rest. Later he will discover the limits of reason and human effort, and by a natural reaction will fall into a pessimism strangely discordant with the characteristic buoyancy of his spirit.

"Even in the century of his exuberance the thought of his profoundest men -- who are not his philosophers but his dramatists -- will be clouded over with the elisive brevity of delight and the patient pertinacity of death."

Man is the measure of all things?

Robby

Éloïse De Pelteau
April 17, 2003 - 11:46 am
"The Athenians are not all sages, and we must not picture their women as all lovely...

Ouf, for a while there I thought that Durant was going to forget that there were women in Athens. Ariel must have given him a nudge.

"He has no patience with learned obfuscation, and looks upon informed and intelligent conversation as the highest sport of civilization."

I love that.

Eloïse

Malryn (Mal)
April 17, 2003 - 12:04 pm
"The educated Athenian is in love with reason, and seldom doubts its ability to chart the universe."
If the educated Athenian is in love with reason and not in love with metaphysics and the supernatural, then, yes, man was the measure of all things to those people. Even their gods had human traits and physical form.

Very little was written about Ancient Greek women, so very little is known. Check Heracleitus, Thucydides and Plutarch. If the Durants had only small amounts of information and only such evidence as is exhibited on Greek sculpture, amphorae and bas relief, how could they write more about Ancient Greek women than they did?

Mal

georgehd
April 17, 2003 - 02:07 pm
Robby and others - post 271. Is anyone else bothered by Durant's infatuation with the Greeks? They seem almost too good to be true. Too intelligent to be a real population.

I realize the importance of the Durants' work and the fact that these books are regarded as outstanding - but is there more recent critical comment about their work? Robby do you know?

I am also interested in the quote above -"A nation's ideals are usually a disguise, and are not to be taken as history." Are the ideals of the US a disguise and if so what are we trying to foist on the rest of the world?

Are we to assume that well educated human beings are not (should not be) good? Vice is to be chosen over stupidity.

I am sorry to ask more questions than I answer.

Malryn (Mal)
April 17, 2003 - 02:56 pm

George, I think perhaps if you'd read Volume I, Our Oriental Heritage, you'd have seen that Durant was enthusiastic about other civilizations, too.

Is it possible for you to get the books where you live? Used bookstores here in the States have the set for not too much money, I find. They can be bought from bookstores on the web.

Mal

robert b. iadeluca
April 17, 2003 - 05:46 pm
"The Greek aspires neither to the conscience of the good bourgeois, nor to the sense of honor of the aristocrat. To the Greek the best life is the fullest one, rich in health, strength, beauty, passion, means, adventure, and thought. Virtue is arete, manly -- literally and originally, martial -- excellence (Ares, Mars) -- precisely what the Romans called vir-tus, man-liness.

"The Athenian ideal man is the kalokagathos, who combines beauty and justice in a gracious art of living that frankly values ability, fame, wealth, and friends as well as virtue and humanity. As with Goethe, self-development is everything.

"Along with this conception goes a degree of vanity whose candor is hardly to our taste. The Greeks never tire of admiring themselves, and announce at every turn their superiority to other warriors, writers, artists, peoples.

"If we wish to understand the Greeks as against the Romans we must think of the French vs. the English. If we wish to feel the Spartan spirit as opposed to the Athenian we must think of the Germans vs. the French."

Eloise?

Robby

Éloïse De Pelteau
April 17, 2003 - 05:51 pm
George, about "The Athenians are too brilliant to be good, and scorn stupidity more than they abominate vice." I agree with what you said in post #274. My first thought when I read that was "Brilliantly worded but arrogant and conceited".

Malryn (Mal)
April 17, 2003 - 06:05 pm

Chacun a son goût. I seem to be only one of a small few who think study of the Durants' work is really worthwhile. What I've learned since we began reading and discussing these books has increased my knowledge and enhanced my view of past history and now. I'm off to my closet to study alone.

Mal

Éloïse De Pelteau
April 17, 2003 - 06:16 pm
Robby, The Germans vs the French? Right now, they are pals because of necessity, Europe must be United if it wants to compete with the US. If England is closer to the US than the French are at the moment in my opinion, it is because of their common language. It is strongest bond between humans.

The French and the Germans will never be really close, their language being too different. The personality of a nation is attached to its language. The weakness of a United Europe is that there are too many languages spoken in too small an area. This will keep them back economically and militarily.

Eloïse

georgehd
April 17, 2003 - 06:56 pm
Mal, I have found the entire set on line but have not ordered yet. I will not be in the US until mid May so have a little more time to consider.

Not sure what you meant in your last post. It seems that all members of this group find Durant interesting and challenging. You are not alone in your closet.

Eloise, one of my sons in law is an anthropoligist, born in Belgium but reared and educated in the US. His doctoral thesis examined the difficulties faced by the European nations in communicating with one another. Each nationality brings its own history, its biases, its interpretation of words to the conference table; the same words mean different things to different people.

"Civilization begins where chaos and insecurity ends." I keep looking at those words and thinking about the situation in Iraq. I am quite angry that Rumsfeld did not listen to those who warned that chaos was a likely outcome in Iraq.

kiwi lady
April 17, 2003 - 07:03 pm
George anyone who has read Modern or ancient Middle Eastern History would know what is a likely outcome in the aftermath of this war. I too find it hard to believe it seems so little study and thought was put into planning for a post war Iraq. Wholeheartedly agree with your last post.Most revealing was an interview I watched with an English diplomat who had been posted in the Middle East for many years. It confirmed my thoughts on the matter

Carolyn

Justin
April 17, 2003 - 11:57 pm
Kiwi,George; Yes, I too think the post war period was not well planned . Good lord, they failed to expect looting, and thus must suffer blame for stolen and destroyed artifacts from the cradle of civilization. One of the things that disappeared was Hamurrabi's code of laws. I blame Franks but Rumsfeld's response was irresponsible but typical of this administration. Sorry Robby. Some things are just too much to ignore.

Justin
April 18, 2003 - 12:25 am
George; There are several works on the Greeks you may wish to read. One is a History of Greece by J.B. Bury, another is Kitto's work on the same subject. Plutarch's Lives in a good source as is Pausanias. Among the moderns you will find Mac Kendrick's Greek Stones and also Biers" work. Michael Grant did something with the Myths and Robinson wrote a history of Hellas. You can find much of this Biblio in the Public Library. The wars can be found in Herodotus and Thucydides.

robert b. iadeluca
April 18, 2003 - 04:11 am
As indicated by the GREEN quotes above, Durant moves us on - - -

"The physical basis of love is accepted frankly by both sexes. The love philters that anxious ladies brew for negligent men have no merely Platonic aim. Premarital chastity is required of respectable women, but among unmarried men after the ephebic period there are few moral restraints upon desire.

"The great festivals, though religious in origin, are used as safety valves for the natural promiscuity of humanity. Sexual license on such occasions is condoned in the belief that monogamy may be more easily achieved during the balance of the year. No stigma is attached in Athens to the occasional intercourse of young men with courtesans. Even married men may patronize them without any greater moral penalty than a scolding at home and a slightly tarnished reputation in the city.

"Athens officially recognizes prostitution, and levies a tax upon its practitioners."

I was wondering -- any connection between sexual license and civilization or lack thereof?

Robby

Bubble
April 18, 2003 - 04:56 am
Should there be a connection? or is virginity just like milk teeth, a stage one outgrows? In many societies a woman was worth as such only from the time she could prove capable of producing offsprings. If I remember it certainly is the case in Polynesia and in Africa too. Only the missionaries changed that view.



I find completely barbaric certain customs to keep the sexes as totally separated as different species until the wedding night. Bubble

Hats
April 18, 2003 - 05:19 am
Since promiscuity was rampant in Ancient Greece, were there any communicable diseases? When we think of promiscuity today, our minds automatically think of the physical consequences.

Malryn (Mal)
April 18, 2003 - 07:00 am

"The ancient Greeks were among the first to take advantage of oregano's medicinal qualities. The Greeks termed the spice origanos, meaning "delight of the mountains." Those who have visited Greece, where oregano covers the hillsides and scents the summer air, would probably agree with this name. The sweet, spicy scent of Oregano was reputedly created by the Goddess Aphrodite as a symbol of happiness. Bridal couples were crowned with garlands of oregano, and the plants were placed on the tombs to give peace to departed spirits. It was also used to prevent and treat venereal diseases."

"The 2,500 species of bay tree (lauraceae) include cinnamon and avocado pears. It also offers some lovely anecdotes: the branches of vitex, a Mediterranean native known as the chaste tree in ancient Greece, were used in festivals to affirm women's chastity, while its seeds were hustled off by early herbalists to treat their menfolk's venereal diseases."

Leda and the Swan

Youths and Hetairai

Malryn (Mal)
April 18, 2003 - 07:12 am
"As in the Symposium of Plato and Xenophon, where the drinking party is the setting for philosophical discussion, so Athenaeus (fl. AD 200) uses the framework of the symposium for literary and antiquarian exposition. In Book XIII of the Deipnosophists (Sophists at Dinner), he relates the collected witty sayings (chreia) of famous hetairai and anecdotes about them. Once, for example, when Phrynê was asked for her favors, she demanded a mina in payment. 'Too much' was the reply. 'Didn't you, the other day, stay with a stranger after you had received only two gold pieces?' 'Well then, said she, 'you too wait until I feel like indulging myself, and I will accept that amount.'"

More about hetairai

Hats
April 18, 2003 - 07:16 am
Mal, that is so interesting. When I think of oregano, I think of spaghetti and meatballs. There is so much to learn. Thanks for the links. There were so many uses for oregano: medicinal, bridal wear and for the dead.

robert b. iadeluca
April 18, 2003 - 11:57 am
"The lowest order of harlotry, the pornai, live chiefly at the Piraeus, in common brothels marked for the convenience of the public with the phallic symbol of Priapus. An obol secures admission to these houses, where the girls, so lightly clad that they are called gymnai (naked), allow their prospective purchasers to examine them like dogs in a kennel. A man may strike a bargain for any period of time, and may arrange with the madam of the house to take a girl to live with him for a week, a month, or a year. Sometimes a girl is hired out in this way to two or more men, distributing her time among them according to their means.

"Higher than these girls in the affection of the Athenians are the auletrides, or flute-players, who, like the geisha of Japan, assist at 'stag' entertainments, provide music and gaiety, perform dances artistic or lascivious, and then, if properly induced, mingle with the guests and spend the night with them. A few old courtesans may stave off destitution by developing training schools for such flute girls, and teaching them the science of cosmetic adornment, personal transfiguration, musical entertainment, and amorous dalliance.

"Tradition hands down carefully from one generation of courtesans to another, like a precious heritage, the arts of inspring love by judicious display, holding it by coy refusal, and making it pay. Nevertheless some of the auletrides, if we may take Lucian's word for it from a later age, have tender hearts, know real affection, and ruin themselves, Camille-like, for their lovers' sakes.

"The honest courtesan is an ancient theme hoary with the dignity of age."

Robby

Justin
April 18, 2003 - 05:47 pm
The phallus continues to be used to point the way in Piraeus just as we would use an arrow. Carved phalluses in a variety of sizes may be purchased from street venders and other retailers in Piraeus. They were very popular with American sailors.

robert b. iadeluca
April 18, 2003 - 05:52 pm
Everything you ever wanted to know about COURTESANSHIP and were afraid to ask.

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
April 18, 2003 - 08:34 pm
Demosthenes: The trial of (courtesan) Neaera

Bubble
April 19, 2003 - 02:39 am
Very interesting, Robby.



I wonder if there are many today as outspoken as this Evelyn?
Anyone here, or of your aquaintances who would admit to being or keeping a coutesan? It is not like the modern arrangement of living together either. Bubble

robert b. iadeluca
April 19, 2003 - 03:54 am
Mal:--I read the whole link. Intriguing to follow the logic.

Bubble:--None of my acquaintances are wealthy enough to support a courtesan!

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
April 19, 2003 - 05:52 am
"Unlike the pornai, who are mostly of Oriental birth, the hetairai are usually women of the citizen class, who have fallen from the respectability or fled from the seclusion required of Athenian maids and matrons. They live independently, and entertain at their own homes the lovers whom they lure. Though they are mostly brunettes by nature, they dye their hair yellow in the belief that Athenians prefer blondes. They distinguish themselves, apparently under legal compulsion, by wearing flowery robes.

"By occasional reading, or attending lectures, some of them acquire a modest education, and amuse their cultured patrons with learned conversation. Thais, Diotima, Thargelia, and Leontium, as well as Aspasia, are celebrated as philosophical disputants, and sometimess for their polished literary style. Many of them are renowned for their wit, and Athenian literature has an anthology of hetairai epigrams.

"Though all courtesans are denied civil rights, and are forbidden to enter any temple but that of their own goddess, Aphrodite Pandemos, a select minority of the hetairai enjoy a high standing in male society at Athens.

"No man is ashamed to be seen with these. Philosphers contend for their farors."

If I understand this correctly, many "homemakers" leave their apparently boring life to become high-level prostitutes and in so doing, receive an opportunity to become independent and to associate with learned men. They may lose their "civil rights" but apparently don't care. What they receive in their life is, to them, greater than what their civil rights could give them.

Am I understanding this correctly?

Robby

Éloïse De Pelteau
April 19, 2003 - 07:17 am
A courtesan is a young woman, barring a few exceptions.

Once prime youth has faded, somewhere in the late twenties, respect was/is more precious than gold for mature women. Nobody can take that away from her once she has earned it.

Eloïse

Malryn (Mal)
April 19, 2003 - 08:34 am

This quote is from the Malaspina Great Books site.

"There is a tradition that Aspasia of Melitus was the teacher of Sophocles. She was a contemporary of his and the companion of the Greek general Pericles. The notion that she influenced is drawn in part from the tone of a conversation between her character in a fragment of the lost dialogue Aspasia written by Aeschines. The fragment is preserved in Inventione Rhetorica. The conversation is between Aspasia [A] and the wife of Xenophon[X]:



"[A] Tell me, please, wife of Xenophon, if your neighbour had a better piece of gold jewelry than you, would you prefer hers or your own?



"[X] Hers, said the wife.



"[A] So--if she should have a dress or other feminine ornament more expensive than you have, would you prefer hers or yours?



"[X]Hers, naturally, said the wife.



"[A] So now: what if that woman had a better husband than you? Would you prefer hers or your own?



"Here the woman blushed. Aspasia, however, began to interrogate Xenophon himself.




Click here to access an article about Hetairai

georgehd
April 19, 2003 - 09:59 am
Robby - how did you find Evelyn? Interesting that she chose the word courtesan as I suspect that she is an expensive call girl. I do not think it matters what you call it - sex has been a commodity for thousands of years. Mistresses in Europe have been the norm in the upper classes for generations. I think that the US differs in its feeling and handling of these issues because of our Puritan background. Today, however, our exposure to sexual issues has changed radically. Just look at TV - Friends, Sex in the City, Six Feet Under, The Sopranos. All of these extremely popular shows include sexual issues in an important way. Another trend, though less frequent, is females seeking out male companions, males seeking out male companions and females seeking out female companions. We have come a long way since my youth.

Are we now more civilized? A good question I think. My guess is - we are not so different from the Greeks.

robert b. iadeluca
April 19, 2003 - 10:08 am
Whether my new computer has arrived or not this coming week, I will be away at a psychological conference from Wednesday noon until Saturday evening. I know that this discussion group will continue on in its usual competent way.

Speaking of "being away" -- I intend to attend the Senior Net Bash from August 14-17 in Calgary, Alberta, and would be most pleased to meet personally some of our "family" here. When I attended the Bash in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, there were SNetters from Canada, New Zealand, South Africa, England, Scotland, and states all across the nation. So maybe some of you here (including lurkers -- of which I know for a fact that there are many) would consider joining us in Calgary in August. Click onto the Alberta discussion group for the details.

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
April 19, 2003 - 10:14 am
George:--You want to know how I found Evelyn? You want ME to give away secret seductive methods that took me decades to learn? You want me to SHARE procedures that were given to me privately by an Ancient Greek I met in an Oriental Ashram? I may be a "discussion" leader but am also a psychologist who believes in confidentiality.

Go find your own courtesan. Good luck!

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
April 19, 2003 - 10:24 am
She certainly has a beautiful . . . ah . . . website.

Bubble
April 19, 2003 - 10:27 am
I wish I could grab Mal and together we could both join you in Calgary, Robby. What do you say, Mal?
I am dying to experience one of those meetings. Maybe if there is one in Europe... *wishful thinking*.



Have an enjoyable time at the conference. Bubble

Malryn (Mal)
April 19, 2003 - 10:37 am
BUBBLE, it would be wonderful fun. We could set up a wheelchair brigade, or better still a chorus line and lead the show. Oh, the things we'd have to talk about! Maybe sometime. Right, ET ?

Mal

georgehd
April 19, 2003 - 11:22 am
Another site for your arousal.

http://www.mtholyoke.edu/courses/rschwart/hist255-s01/courtesans/defining-the-courtesan.htm

robby, I would share her number with you.

robert b. iadeluca
April 19, 2003 - 11:34 am
"There is Clepsydra, so named because she accepts and dismisses her lovers by the hourglass.

"Thargelia, who, as the Mata Hari of her time, serves the Persians as a spy by sleeping with as many as possible of the statesmen of Athens.

"Theoris, who consoles the old age of Sophocles, and Archippe, who succeeds her about the ninth decade of the dramatist's life.

"Archeanassa, who amuses Plato, and Danae and Leontium, who teach Epicurus the philosophy of pleasure.

"Themistonoe, who practices her art until she has lost her last tooth and her last lock of hair.

"The businesslike Gnathaena, who, having spent much time in the training of her daughter, demands a thousand drachmas ($1000) as the price of the young lady's company for a night.

"The beauty of Phryne is the talk of fourth-century Athens, since she never appears in public except completely veiled, but, at the Eleusinian festival, and again on the feast of the Poseidonia, disrobes in the sight of all, lets down her hair, and goes to bathe in the sea.

"For a time she loves and inspires Praxiteles, and poses for his Aphrodites. From her, too, Apelles takes his Aphrodite Anadyomene.

"So rich is Phryne from her loves that she offers to rebuild the walls of Thebes if the Thebans will inscribe her name on the structure, which they stubbornly refuse to do. Perhaps she asks too large an honorarium from Euthias.

"He revenges himself by indicting her on a charge of impiety. But a member of the court is one of her clients, and Hypereides, the orator, is her devoted lover. Hypereides defends her not only with eloquence but by opening her tunic and revealing her bosom to the court.

"The judges look upon her beauty, and vindicate her piety."

I go under the assumption that there must be some sort of message (messages?) here. Can someone enlighten us?

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
April 19, 2003 - 11:46 am
George, you gave us an excellent link. And each of the sub-links attached to that were most enlightening and thought provoking.

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
April 20, 2003 - 04:09 am
"The chief rivals of the hetairai are the boys of Athens. The courtesans, scandalized to the very depths of their pockets, never tire of denouncing the immorality of homosexual love. Merchants import handsome lads to be sold to the highest bidder, who will use them first as concubines and later as slaves.

"Only a negligible minority of males think it amiss that the effeminate young aristocrats of the city should arouse and assuage the ardor of aging men. When Aleman wishes to compliment some girls he calls them his 'female boy-friends.'

"Athenian law disfranchises those who receive homosexual attentions, but public opinion tolerates the practice humorously. In Sparta and Crete no stigma of any kind is attached to it. In Thebes it is accepted as a valuable source of military organization and bravery."

As we examine this aspect of Ancient Greek civilization from the perspective of our own culture, do we see "through a glass darkly?" Are we able to stand aside as a sociologist and ask why Greek public opinion tolerated this practice although it was described even by them as immoral and illegal?

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
April 20, 2003 - 07:00 am



"They knew about reproduction. They knew about lust and love. They knew about the intensity of sexual desire between men and men, women and women, but for them, Lesbos was just an island off the coast of Asia Minor while Sappho was your average Pulitzer Prize winning poet."


Gore Vidal

Malryn (Mal)
April 20, 2003 - 07:13 am

What's good for the gods is good for the humans? What about . . .

Zeus and Ganymede

Malryn (Mal)
April 20, 2003 - 07:40 am
"Ganymede, the son of the Trojan king, had won great fame, but not in battle, nor in the contests of strength. His shape alone had made him famous, for he was most handsome of all men on this earth. Whenever he and his friends took to the streets of Troy, Ganymede turned the heads of all the townsfolk; men and women, all fell for his stunning, god-like beauty. To keep him safe, the king set his guards to watch over the boy.



"One day, Ganymede shed his clothes to bathe in the warm waters of the Mediterranean. Looking down from the heavens the eye of father Zeus lighted upon the prince, and the sight of the young Trojan's thighs instantly set the god on fire with love. Hera, his wife, fumed in silence, her only relief the thought that at least the youth was far away. But Zeus, heedless of her jealousy, devised a plan to bring the boy to Olympus.









"First the god took the shape of an eagle. Then he unleashed a fierce thunderstorm, plunging all Troy into darkness. Winging down into the black clouds coiling about the city, the eagle sent shafts of lightning stabbing every which way. Ganymede's friends and guardians raced for shelter, falling over each other in their haste. Amid the turmoil, the eagle swooped out of the clouds and pounced upon the awestruck boy. It set him astride its back and launched itself once more upon the wind. The guardians raced back to save the prince, but the eagle beat the air with powerful wings once, twice, and the storm swallowed them up.



"They flew beyond the clouds, lost themselves into the deep blue sky, and the boy clung in wonder to his plumes. At last the eagle set down, folded its wings, and Ganymede found himself amidst the crystal halls of Olympus. A god once more, Zeus wrapped a friendly arm around his shoulder, looked him in the eye, and let him know that from now on he would walk among the immortals.



"In vain Hera protested that Ganymede gave nothing she could not offer, that her beauty behind fully equaled her beauty in front. Zeus tumbled again and again in bed with the curly blond prince, and Ganymede paraded around with a perpetual grin on his face. Before long, he and Eros, the youngest of the gods, became fast friends. Every chance they got, the boys went off by themselves, casting dice for hours on end. But greedy Eros was way too sly a player – he beat Ganymede every time, left him penniless and in tears.



"To make room in Olympus for his boyfriend, Zeus turned on Hebe, Hera's daughter, who had always served the gods at table. He claimed she stumbled, mocked her for being clumsy and sent her packing. At feast times it was Ganymede now who mulled the red nectar and filled each god's cup to the brim. And on coming round to Zeus, he would first plant a kiss on the rim of the chalice before handing it back to his loving lord.



"Hera was livid with rage. She turned on Zeus, berating him for bringing that horrid long-haired mortal to Olympus. Her husband threw in her face that he liked the boy's kisses best, and bestowed immortality on his beloved. Now Ganymede was like a god, forever young.



"Seething with jealousy, Hera hungered for revenge. Unable to harm Ganymede she went after his people instead. She fanned the flames of war and, in the end, all Greece rose up and massacred the Trojans. But Ganymede himself was beyond her reach. Zeus had set the boy among the stars—as Aquarius, the water bearer, shielding him forever under the wings of the Eagle."

Malryn (Mal)
April 20, 2003 - 07:52 am
"SOCRATES to ALCIBIADES: I dare say that you may be surprised to find, O son of Cleinias, that I, who am your first lover, not having spoken to you for many years, when the rest of the world were wearying you with their attentions, am the last of your lovers who still speaks to you."

You‘ll find more in:



The First Alcibiades by Plato

georgehd
April 20, 2003 - 10:37 am
It would seem to me that all of this sex in Greek culture would be an anathema to the deeply religious educators of the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries. Why then, did the classics play such an important part in Western education or did they just leave out the "good" parts?

Bubble
April 20, 2003 - 11:03 am
You are right George: I was immersed from young age in classical education, all ththoughts, writings of Hellenic culture were praised and admired, but... I never heard of the "good parts" as you call them. Even the romps of mythological gods were downplayed.



To give you a more contemporary example of how it was done: In French literature in highschool we were studying George Sand. The nun teacher was telling us how this writer was in touch with many artists and prominent people of her time. About G. Sand's interest in Chopin, she explained that it was a keen literary friendship! We were innocent enough to accept it at face value.
Bubble

robert b. iadeluca
April 20, 2003 - 12:18 pm
The word PURITANICAL as commented upon by the New Thesaurus.

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
April 20, 2003 - 12:35 pm
"The greatest heroes in the fond remembrance of Athens are Harmodius and Aristogeiton, tyrannicides and lovers. The most most popular in Athens in his day is Alcibiades, who boasts of the men who love him. As late as Aristotle 'Greek lovers' plight their troth at the tomb of Iolatis, comrade of Heracles. Aristippus describes Xenophon, leader of armies and hardheaded man of the world, as infatuated with young Cleinias.

"The attachment of a man to a boy, or of a boy to a boy, shows in Greece all the symptoms of romantic love -- passion, piety, ecstasy, jealousy, serenading, brooding, moaning, and sleeplessness. When Plato, in the Phaedrus, talks of human love, he means homosexual love. The disputants in his Symposium agree on one point -- that love between man and man is nobler and more spiritual than love between man and woman.

"A similar inversion appears among the women, occasionally among the finest, as in Sappho, frequently among the courtesans. The auletrides love one another more passionately than they love their patrons, and the pornaia are hothouses of Lesbian romance."

Would everyone agree that studying a different culture, whether ancient or contemporary, requires a completely objective appraisal? What is good or bad? Moral or immoral? Clean or dirty? Proper or improper? It is exceedingly difficult (for most of us at least) to examine the traits and behaviors of others without filtering our conclusions through our early moral, religious, and familial training.

And we haven't arrived at Rome yet!!

Robby

Bubble
April 20, 2003 - 02:11 pm
Maybe they were amoral, Not immoral?



Robby's post made me wonder who are the most puritanical these days. England is certainly more liberal than sixty years ago, for example. Would America be more strict these days?

georgehd
April 20, 2003 - 03:05 pm
39094. Mencken, H.L. (Henry Lewis). The Columbia World of Quotations. 1996 ...NUMBER:39094 QUOTATION:Show me a Puritan and I'll show you a son-of-a-bitch.

Malryn (Mal)
April 20, 2003 - 03:31 pm

George, you made me laugh.
In an earlier post I quote Gore Vidal: "(To the Greeks) Lesbos was just an island off the coast of Asia Minor while Sappho was your average Pulitzer Prize winning poet."
I think that's a pretty good way to describe the Ancient Greeks. They weren't immoral; they weren't amoral. Their morality was very different from that here in the United States. I can't speak of the morality of other countries because I don't know enough facts.

Ancient Greeks weren't pushed by a religion full of behavior codes which could easily lead to guilt if one disobeyed them. Why should the Greeks feel guilty about things that seemed natural to them? As I pointed out, Zeus was a god, and he had himself a lover named Ganymede. Why shouldn't ordinary people have same sex lovers, too?

As I see it, Christian religions in the United States are loaded with guilt-producing rules, the "Thou shalts" and "Thou shalt nots", which are perhaps a continuation of Puritan interpretations of the Christian Bible. The earliest settlers of America were either Puritan Protestant English or Cstholic Spanish and French, so the tradition is obvious.

I've thought for decades that there must be an easier and better way of creating self-discipline than the assumption of a hair shirt of guilt accompanied by the assurance that punishment from God will come down on one hard for the slightest step off the prescribed straight and narrow path.

Mal

robert b. iadeluca
April 20, 2003 - 03:46 pm
George:--We refrain from that language here even though it may be a quotation. There are many participants and lurkers here who might not find that funny.

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
April 20, 2003 - 03:58 pm
"How shall we explain the popularity of this perversion in Greece? Aristotle attributes it to fear of overpopulation, and this may account for part of the phenomenon. There is obviously a connection between the prevalence of both homosexuality and prostitution in Athens, and the seclusion of women.

"After the age of six the boys of Periclean Athens are taken from the gynaeceum in which respectable women spend their lives, and are brought up chiefly in companionship with other boys, or men. Little opportunity is given them, in their formative and almost neutral period, to know the attractiveness of the tender sex. The life of the common mess hall in Sparta, of the agora, gymnasium, and palaestra in Athens, and the career of the ephebos, show the youth only the male form. Even art does not announce the physical beauty of woman until Praxiteles.

"In married life the men seldom find mental companionship at home. The rarity of education among women creates a gulf between the sexes, and men seek elsewhere the charms that they have not permitted their wives to acquire.

"To the Athenian citizen his home is not a castle but a dormitory. From morning to evening, in a great number of cases, he lives in the city, and rarely has social contacts with respectable women other than his wife and daughters."

As we discuss this sub-topic, please keep in mind that we do not know the sexual orientation of our participants and lurkers nor is it any of our business. We respect everyone here as one human being to another and practice courtesy and consideration.

Robby

Justin
April 20, 2003 - 04:17 pm
Americans persecuted Bill for a heterosexual activity, but seem to be more tolerant toward homosexual and lesbian relationships than we were ten years ago. We're not fully tolerant yet. There are still too many sons of bitches around.

Justin
April 20, 2003 - 04:35 pm


Let's face it. The Greeks had much of the sex thing right and the early American colonials managed to throw it away in places like Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut where most of the sons of bitches came ashore. The religious folks did their part by condemning fun and making procreation paramount.

Americans have been trying in the last few generations to overcome inhibitions, to move women off the pedestal, and to give folks a chance to have fun with one another in any way they can.

robert b. iadeluca
April 20, 2003 - 06:11 pm
As an old Infantry First Sergeant, there isn't a word that I haven't heard or used. I don't get offended easily. But I recognize that some people do and, in courtesy to them, choose my words carefully.

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
April 20, 2003 - 06:32 pm
Durant moves us to the next section:--

"We find little of romantic love in Homer, where Agamemnon and Achilles frankly think of Chryseis and Briseis, even of the discouraging Cassandra, in terms of physical desire. Nausicaa, however, is a warning against too broad a generalization, and legends as old as Homer tell of Heracles and Iola, of Orpheus and Eurydice.

"The lyric poets, again, talk abundantly of love, commonly in the sense of amorous appetite. Stories like that which Stesichorus tells of a maiden dying for love are exceptional. As refinement grows, and superimposes poetry upon heat, the tender sentiment becomes more frequent. The increasing delay that civilization places between desire and fulfillment gives imagination leisure to embellish the object of hope. The later dramatists often describe a youth desperately enamored of a girl.

"Such affairs in classic Greece lead rather to premarital relations than to matrimony. The Greeks would smile at anyone who should propose it as a fit guide in the choice of a marriage mate.

"Normally marriage is arranged by the parents as in always classic France, or by professional matchmakers, with an eye not to love but to dowries. The father is expected to provide for his daughter a marriage portion of money, clothing, jewelry, and perhaps slaves. This remains to its end the property of the wife, and reverts to her in case of a separation from her husband -- a consideration that discourages divorce by the male. Without a dowry a girl has little chance of marriage. Where the father cannot give it to her the relatives combine to provide it. Marriage by purchase, so frequent in Homeric days, has by this means been inverted in Periclean Greece. In effect, the woman has to buy her master.

"The Greek, then, marries not for love, nor because he enjoys matrimony (for he prates endlessly about its tribulations), but to continue himself and the state through a wife suitably dowered, and children who will ward off the evil fate of an untended soul. Even with these inducements he avoids wedlock as long as he can. The letter of the law forbids him to remain single, but the law is not always enforced in Periclean days. After him the number of bachelors mounts until it becomes one of the basic problems of Athens.

"There are so many ways of being amused in Greece. Those men who yield marry late, usually near thirty, and then insist upon brides not much older than fifteen."

Your comments, please?

Robby

Justin
April 20, 2003 - 07:48 pm
Thirty something men who marry fifteen year olds want a female they can dominate- one who will not complain when a boy or a courtesan supercedes them in the bedroom. That's what happens when men can choose a mate. I wonder how women would act were the roles to be reversed. Would women choose fifteen year old boys for mates?

Bubble
April 21, 2003 - 03:17 am
Never, Justin! A boy at fifteen is often a grown child. A girl would be much more mature already. This is in the world I know anyway.



I think that marriages with the groom a few years older than the bride have better chances to be more stable. Somehow men keep their looks longer too.

Arranged marriages are still frequent in Israel, through matchmakers who search families's pedigrees back a few generations. This especially true in the very religious circle. As for the sabras born, there is a very serious trend at living together without matrimony, for various reasons, one being not wanting to go through a religious ceremony. Up to now civil marriage was not recognized and involved a trip abroad to register it. Even then it is not binding and the offsprings are considered bastards.
Bubble

robert b. iadeluca
April 21, 2003 - 04:23 am
"A choice having been made, and the dowry agreed upon, a solemn betrothal takes place in the home of the girl's father. There must be witnesses, but her own presence is not necessary. Without such a formal betrothal no union is valid in Athenian law. It is considered to be the first act in the complex rite of marriage.

"The second act, which follows in a few days, is a feast in the house of the girl. Before coming to it the bride and bridegroom, in their separate homes, bathe in-ceremonial purification. At the feast the men of both families sit on one side of the room, the women on the other. A wedding cake is eaten, and much wine is drunk. Then the bridgroom escorts his veiled and white-robed bride -- whose face he may not yet hae seen -- into a carriage, and takes her to his father's dwelling amid a procession of friends and flute-playing girls, who light the way with torches and raise the hymeneal chant.

"Arrived, he carries the girl over the threshold, as if in semblance of capture. The parents of the youth greet the girl, and receive her with religious ceremony into the circle of the family and the worship of its gods. No priest, however, takes any part in the ritual.

"The guests then escort the couple to their room with an epithalamion, or marriage-chamber song, and linger boisterously at the door until the bridegroom announces to them that the marriage has been consummated."

I wonder how many people in our own society who have followed similar rituals realize that they are following a tradition 2,500 years old or more. In France not too many years ago there was a tradition in various parts of rural France, e.g. Brittany, of the guests walking around the house banging pots and pans while the marriage was being consummated. I forget the French word for this.

Robby

Bubble
April 21, 2003 - 04:54 am
You took the words from my mouth. The purification bath, the women sitting on one side and the men on the other side during the ceremony, the bride veiled and white clad and almost never seen alone if at all until that ceremony. It really sounds so familiar. Check books by Naomi Ragen if you want to know more.



At least nowadays the bride's mother does not parade anymore with a bloodied sheet!~ I never heard of the pots and pans music? Is that to keep the evil spirits away?

robert b. iadeluca
April 21, 2003 - 04:59 am
I should clarify. "Around" the house meant outside, not inside.

Robby

Éloïse De Pelteau
April 21, 2003 - 06:25 am
Robby - I think the word you are looking for is "charivari", or a lot of noise. We still use this word. It sounds almost the same as "chevalerie" but it does not have the same meaning as this last one meaning: "Knighthood".

Malryn (Mal)
April 21, 2003 - 07:56 am



"Athenian Marriage Rites.--However, thus runs public custom. At about fifteen the girl must leave her mother's fostering care and enter the house of the stranger. The wedding is, of course, a great ceremony; and here, if nowhere else, Athenian women can surely prepare, flutter, and ordain to their heart's content. After the somewhat stiff and formal betrothal before witnesses (necessary to give legal effect to the marriage), the actual wedding will probably take place,--perhaps in a few days, perhaps with a longer wait till the favorite marriage month Gamelion [January].

“Then on a lucky night of the full moon the bride, having, no doubt tearfully, dedicated to Artemis her childish toys, will be decked in her finest and will come down, all veiled, into her father's torchlit aula, swarming now with guests. Here will be at last that strange master of her fate, the bridegroom and his best man (paranymphos).

"Her father will offer sacrifice (probably a lamb), and after the sacrifice everybody will feast on the flesh of the victim; and also share a large flat cake of pounded sesame seeds roasted and mixed with honey. As the evening advances the wedding car will be outside the door. The mother hands the bride over to the groom, who leads her to the chariot, and he and the groomsman sit down, one on either side, while with torches and song the friends to with the car in jovial procession to the house of the young husband.

"This winter month was sacred to Hera, the marriage guardian. 'Ho, Hymen! Ho, Hymen! Hymenæous! Io!'

"So rings the refrain of the marriage song; and all the doorways and street corners are crowded with onlookers to shout fair wishes and good-natured raillery.

"At the groom's house there is a volley of confetti to greet the happy pair. The bride stops before the threshold to eat a quince (a fertility fruit).There is another feast,--possibly riotous fun and hard drinking. At last the bride is led, still veiled, to the perfumed and flower-hung marriage chamber. The doors close behind the married pair. Their friends sing a merry rollicking catch outside, the Epithalamium. The great day has ended. The Athenian girl has experienced the chief transition of her life."

More from A Day in Old Athens by William Stearns Davis (1910) HERE

robert b. iadeluca
April 21, 2003 - 06:11 pm
"Says Demosthenes, 'We have courtesans for the sake of pleasure, concubines for the daily health of our bodies, and wives to bear us lawful offspring and be the faithful guardians of our homes.' Here in one startling sentence is the Greek view of woman in the classic age.

"Draco's laws permit concubinage. After the Sicilian expedition of 415, when the roll of citizens has been depleted by war and many girls cannot find husbands, the law explicitly allows double marriages. Socrates and Euripides are among those who assume this patriotic obligation. The wife usually accepts concubinage with Oriental patience, knowing that the 'second wife,' when her charms wear off, will become in effect a household slave, and that only the offspring of the first wife are accounted legitimate.

"Adultery leads to divorce only when committed by the wife. The husband in such case is spoken of as 'carrying horns' (keroesses), and custome requires him to send his wife away. The law makes adultery by woman, or by a man with a married woman, punishable with death, but the Greeks are too lenient to concupiscence to enforce this statute.

"The injured husband is usually left to deal with the adulterer as he will and can -- sometimes killing him in flagrante delicto, sometimes sending a slave to beat him, sometimes contenting himself with a money indemnity."

Your comments?

Robby

Justin
April 21, 2003 - 11:24 pm
The women of 1919 really achieved something momentous when they gained the voting franchise. Their lot in the US has improved steadily since that time. The world in general, however, is still a dificult place for a woman.If women are to gain a fair shake in the world it must wrenched from the male of the specie by women acting in concert. Unfortunately, women do not always support measures in their best interest.

Bubble
April 22, 2003 - 02:23 am
Justin, your post sounded obscure to me... could you elaborate what you meant? Thanks. It might be a language problem from my side.

robert b. iadeluca
April 22, 2003 - 03:51 am
"Barrenness is accepted as sufficient reason for divorcing a wife, since the purpose of marriage is to have children. If the man is sterile, law permits, and public opinion recommends, the reinforcement of the husband by a relative. The child born of such a union is considered to be the son of the husband, and must tend his departed soul.

"The wife may not at will leave her husband, but she may ask the archons for a divorce on the ground of the cruelty or excesses of her mate. Divorce is also allowed by mutual consent, usually expressed in a formal declaration to the archon. In case of separation, even where the husband has been guilty of adultery, the children remain with the man.

"All in all, in the matter of sex relations, Athenian custom and law are thoroughly man-made, and represent an Oriental retrogression from the society of Egypt, Crete, and the Homeric Age."

Any thoughts here as to whether Ancient Greece in this period is an Oriental civilization?

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
April 22, 2003 - 04:46 am

Indian influence on Ancient Greece

Malryn (Mal)
April 22, 2003 - 04:52 am

Interesting article about the influence of Oriental gardens on gardens in Ancient Greece

robert b. iadeluca
April 22, 2003 - 04:56 am
An interesting link, Mal, and I was especially intrigued by the possible influence of the ancient Siberian people on Greece. First time I had heard about them in the concept of Ancient Greece. Click HERE to learn a bit about these ancient Northerners.

Any thoughts here?

Robby

Bubble
April 22, 2003 - 06:09 am
what a rich site this siberian one is. There is so much of interest!

robert b. iadeluca
April 22, 2003 - 06:14 am
There be three things which are too wonderful for me, yea, four which I know not:
The way of an eagle in the air;
the way of a serpent upon a rock;
the way of a ship in the midst of the sea;
and the way of a man with a maid.

- - - Proverbs 30, Verses 18 & 19

Bubble
April 22, 2003 - 07:02 am
Mmmmmmmm and verse 20 not included?

Éloïse De Pelteau
April 22, 2003 - 07:15 am
"I want to know what were the steps by which man passed from barbarism to civilization." (Voltaire) said.

"As surprising as anything else in this civilization is the fact that it is brilliant without the aid or stimulus of women." Durant said.

Good thing women don't live by everything men say, otherwise civilization would be in BIG trouble.

Eloïse

Bubble
April 22, 2003 - 07:46 am
Eloise, let's not destroy all their illusions...

Malryn (Mal)
April 22, 2003 - 09:21 am

There have been numerous times, in the past 28 years I've been on my own, when I've wished I could share some of the burdens I carry with a man. It wasn't until I was on my own working at various jobs to earn a living for myself and often for other people, too, that I fully realized what men put on themselves when they go out in the world. It was then I began to realize that men are not responsible for all the trials and tribulations women have, and my hard feminist attitude began to soften.

Because I never expected that I'd have to work at a job to support myself, I was completely untrained for jobs which would have suited me far better than the minimum wage jobs I had. I can't blame a man's world for the fact that I wasn't hired to do jobs for which I had no background or training; men in a similar position weren't being hired to do them either. If I had to do it over again with the knowledge I have now, my education would have been quite different from what it was.

I admire my daughter, who began working as a teenager. She has supported herself and has helped support her family for a long time. She has made it a point to learn new technology and has never been afraid to jump into a job. She has turned an education in art and art history into skills which made her Web Content Manager for the Fuqua Business School at Duke University, a job which pays very well, one which if she did the same thing in industry she would be paid even more. Of course, she had her sometimes very hungry and always struggling mother as an example before her, as well as some very successful business and professional women we know.

Mal

Malryn (Mal)
April 22, 2003 - 09:41 am

Hipparchia, the World's First Liberated Woman

Malryn (Mal)
April 22, 2003 - 10:08 am
"GREEK WOMEN: With the exception of ancient Sparta, Greek women had very limited freedom outside the home. They could attend weddings, funerals, some religious festivals, and could visit female neighbors for brief periods of time. In their home, Greek women were in charge! Their job was to run the house and to bear children. Most Greek women did not do housework themselves. Most Greek households had slaves. Female slaves cooked, cleaned, and worked in the fields. Male slaves watched the door, to make sure no one came in when the man of the house was away, except for female neighbors, and acted as tutors to the young male children. Wives and daughters were not allowed to watch the Olympic Games as the participants in the games did not wear clothes. Chariot racing was the only game women could win, and only then if they owned the horse. If that horse won, they received the prize." MORE

Clothing of Ancient Greek Women

robert b. iadeluca
April 22, 2003 - 06:27 pm
"With the help of women the Heroic Age achieved splendor, the age of the dictators a lyric radiance. Then, almost overnight, married women vanish from the history of the Greeks, as if to confute the supposed correlation between the level of civilization and the status of woman.

"In Herodotus woman is everywhere. In Thucydides she is nowhere to be seen. From Semonides of Amorgos to Lucian, Greek literature is offensively repetitious about the faults of women. Toward the close of it even the kindly Plutarch repeats Thucydides: 'The name of a decent woman, like her person, should be shut up in the house.'"

Supposed correlation between the level of civilization and the status of woman?"

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
April 23, 2003 - 09:40 am
"The seclusion of women does not exist among the Dorians. Presumably it comes from the Near East to Ionia, and from Ionia to Attica. It is part of the tradition of Asia. Perhaps the disappearance of inheritance through the mother, the use of the middle classes, and the enthronement of the commercial view of life enter into the change -- men come to judge women in terms of utility, and find them especially useful in the home.

"The Oriental nature of Greek marriage goes with this Attic purdah. The bride is cut off from her kin, goes to live almost as a menial in another home, and worships other gods. She cannot make contracts, or incur debts beyond a trifling sum. When her husband dies, she does not inherit his property.

"Even physiological error enters into her legal subjection. Just as primitive ignorance of the male role in reproduction tended to exalt woman, so the male is exalted by the theory popular in classic Greece that the generative power belongs only to man, the woman being merely the carrier and nurse of the child. The older age of the man contributes to the subordination of the wife. He is twice her years when he marries her, and can in some degree mold her mind to his own philosophy.

"Doubtless the male knows too well the license allowed to his sex in Athens to risk his wife or daughter at large. He chooses to be free at the cost of her seclusion. She may, if properly veiled and attended, visit her relatives or intimates, and may take part in the religious celebrations, incuding attendance at the plays. For the rest she is expected to stay at home, and not allow herself to be seen at a window.

"Most of her life is spent in the women's quarters at the rear of the house. No male visitor is ever admitted there, nor does she appear when men visit her husband."

I have always thought of Greece as being part of Europe and I assume that, in many ways, it is so considered, e.g. member of NATO. Reading this, however, has caused me to realize the strong Asiatic influence in Greece which apparently exists to this day. I shouldn't be surprised when I look at the map. Just a short distance to the east is Turkey for instance. On the other hand, just a short distance to the west is Italy. It makes me wonder how the Greeks themselves feel.

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
April 23, 2003 - 09:41 am
This subjugation of women and those considered inferior has happened throughout history, hasn't it? Periods of freedom are followed by periods of suppression. When the presumed minority gains what is considered too much freedom, the people in it are stepped on, restrained and subdued by the current ruling government.

An example of this which came to my mind is how relatively liberated women in Afghanistan were treated after the Taliban came into power.

Mal

robert b. iadeluca
April 23, 2003 - 09:58 am
"The seclusion of women does not exist among the Dorians. Presumably it comes from the Near East to Ionia, and from Ionia to Attica. It is part of the tradition of Asia. Perhaps the disappearance of inheritance through the mother, the use of the middle classes, and the enthronement of the commercial view of life enter into the change -- men come to judge women in terms of utility, and find them especially useful in the home.

"The Oriental nature of Greek marriage goes with this Attic purdah. The bride is cut off from her kin, goes to live almost as a menial in another home, and worships other gods. She cannot make contracts, or incur debts beyond a trifling sum. When her husband dies, she does not inherit his property.

"Even physiological error enters into her legal subjection. Just as primitive ignorance of the male role in reproduction tended to exalt woman, so the male is exalted by the theory popular in classic Greece that the generative power belongs only to man, the woman being merely the carrier and nurse of the child. The older age of the man contributes to the subordination of the wife. He is twice her years when he marries her, and can in some degree mold her mind to his own philosophy.

"Doubtless the male knows too well the license allowed to his sex in Athens to risk his wife or daughter at large. He chooses to be free at the cost of her seclusion. She may, if properly veiled and attended, visit her relatives or intimates, and may take part in the religious celebrations, incuding attendance at the plays. For the rest she is expected to stay at home, and not allow herself to be seen at a window.

"Most of her life is spent in the women's quarters at the rear of the house. No male visitor is ever admitted there, nor does she appear when men visit her husband."

I have always thought of Greece as being part of Europe and I assume that, in many ways, it is so considered, e.g. member of NATO. Reading this, however, has caused me to realize the strong Asiatic influence in Greece which apparently exists to this day. I shouldn't be surprised when I look at the map. Just a short distance to the east is Turkey for instance. On the other hand, just a short distance to the west is Italy. It makes me wonder how the Greeks themselves feel.

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
April 23, 2003 - 10:01 am
"Wherever you lodge, I will lodge. Thy people shall be my people and thy god shall be my god."

- - - Old Testament, Book of Ruth

Bubble
April 23, 2003 - 12:46 pm
Ruth said this to her mother in law after she herself had lost her husband and was a converted stranger in a foreign land. She was yet to meet the aged Boaz.
I always wondered if she was looking for security, fearing how she would be received back as a widow in her parents place.

robert b. iadeluca
April 23, 2003 - 12:53 pm
"Euripides defends the sex with brave speeches and timid innuendoes. Aristophanes makes fun of them with boisterous indecency. The women go to the heart of the matter and begin to compete with the hetairai in making themselves as attractive as the progress of chemistry will permit. Asks Cleonica in Aristophanes' Lysistrata: 'What sensible thing are we women capable of doing? We do nothing but sit around with our paint and lipstick and transparent gowns, and all the rest of it.' From 411 onward female roles become more prominent in Athenian drama, and reveal the growing escape of women from the solitude to which they have been confined.

"Through it all the real influence of woman over man continues, making her subjection largely unreal. The greater eagerness of the male gives woman an advantage in Greece as elsewhere. Says Samuel Johnson: 'Nature has given woman so much power than the law cannot afford to give her more.'

Sometimes this natural sovereignty is enhanced by a substantial dowry, or an industrious tongue, or uxorious affection. More often it is rhe result of beauty, or the bearing and rearing of fine children, or the slow fusion of souls in the crucible of a common experience and task. An age that can portray such gentle characters as Antigone, Alcestia, Iphigenia, and Andromache, and such heroines as Hecuba, Cassandra, and Medea, could not be unaware of the highest and the deepest in woman.

"The average Athenian loves his wife, and will not always try to conceal it. The funeral stelae reveal surprisingly the tenderness of mate for mate, and of parents for children, in the intimacy of the home. The Greek Anthology is vivid with erotic verse, but it contains also many a touching epigram to a beloved comrade.

"Says one epitaph: 'What profit hath a man whose wife is gone, and who is left solitary on earth?'"

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
April 23, 2003 - 01:02 pm
I now leave you for a seven day period so you can discuss the intricacies of womanhood. Between today and Saturday evening I will be attending a Psychological Conference. In a few minutes I will close out, detach my CPU, and take it to my Guru who next Wednesday, April 30, will bring a new GPU to my home. It will be faster and will have Windows 98 (second edition) rather than my current Windows 95 which is constantly freezing up after a very successful five years. I have no complaint. It has done a yeoman job.

I have said innumerable times (and I repeat) that the Discussion Leader is the least important person in a discussion. If all of you deserted, I would be "leading" a non-existent discussion. On the other hand, I can leave (as I am about to do) and I'm sure you will all have a most spirited "back-and-forth" week."

When I return, we will discuss "THE HOME" and "OLD AGE" before moving on to The Art of Periclean Greece."

As Garrison Keiler says: "Stay well!"

Robby

Fifi le Beau
April 23, 2003 - 01:26 pm
The decline of the status of women in any civilization also marks the decline of that civilization over time. The Greeks took the male children at an early age into the custody of men, away from the influence of their mothers.

This did not happen in the civilization of my ancestors. Where mothers and fathers raise their sons without outside influence, they have a greater impact on how that child will view the place of women as an adult. It was a long journey for women to achieve their rightful place in society, mainly through the west, not the east.

Men must control the young males to have warriors. That has always been their main aim, and it continues today. They entice young men into the military by playing to their basest instincts. I have just finished the book Jarhead by Anthony Swofford, and if you read that book you will understand my premiss.

At his book signing, a mother rose to speak in the question segment. She said that her young son who was four during the Vietnam war awoke one night crying. When she went to ask what was wrong, the child told his mother he did not want to die. She told him that as long as she lived, he would be safe. That was enough for a four year old, and she reinforced it later. She swore to herself that night that her son would not be taken to fight in an unjust war.

Having known both my grandmothers till middle age, and three of my great-grandmothers as a young girl, I cannot imagine any of them ever being confined to a house. Why did the men of the west not confine their women? I like to think it because our men are sensitive and intelligent, but I'm sure the strength of the women in those societies had much to contribute to that tradition.

......

georgehd
April 24, 2003 - 07:32 am
Oh my goodness. For the first time since I joined this group, I found no posts when I went on line. While the cat is away, we are either playing or asleep. Makes me smile. It will also give me some time to review the last few sections and think about them. I hope to have the book by mid May.

I am in the Madame Bovary discussion group where the role of woman is being discussed at great length.

Malryn (Mal)
April 24, 2003 - 08:07 am
I'm here, George, trying to figure out how we can manage to talk about women, especially Ancient Greek women, for a week!

Mal

Malryn (Mal)
April 24, 2003 - 08:55 am

"Classical Greeks were definitely patriarchal with women subserviant to men. Only native male Greeks could be citizens. Women obtained power only when they became the wife of an influential citizen or could obtain some influence by their relation to a man. They were restricted in their activities to mainly within the realm of a family or in the context of the activity of a courtesan. Within the family they might weave, grind grain, direct servants, and mind children. Even so, women were not without their influence, as is stated in a play by Euripides: 'Women run households and protect within their homes what has been carried across the sea, and without a woman no home is clean or prosperous. Consider their role in religion, for that, in my opinion, comes first. We women play the most important part, because women prophesy the will of Loxias in the oracles of Phoibos. And at the holy site of Dodona near the Sacred Oak, females convey the will of Zeus to inquirers from Greece. As for the sacred rituals for the fates and the Nameless goddesses [i.e. the Furies], all these would not be holy if performed by men, but prosper in women's hands. In this way women have a rightful share (dike) in the service of the Gods.' " (Neils, Worshipping Athena, p 78)

More of The Role of Women in Ancient Greek Art

Malryn (Mal)
April 24, 2003 - 09:02 am

"Sophocles (in the 'Tereus') makes them lament,



" 'We women are nothing;--happy indeed is our childhood, for THEN we are thoughtless; but when we attain maidenhood, lo! we are driven away from our homes, sold as merchandise, and compelled to marry and say 'All's well.' "



"Euripides is even more bitter in his 'Medea':--



" 'Surely of creatures that have life and wit,
We women are of all things wretchedest,
Who first must needs, as buys the highest bidder,
Thus buy a husband, and our body's master.[*]' "



[*]Way's translation.

Malryn (Mal)
April 24, 2003 - 10:44 am
Justin, grab an oar, will you? Somebody has to keep rowing this boat!

Mal

georgehd
April 24, 2003 - 12:30 pm
I have not abandoned ship Mal and certainly Women is a topic worth considering. Let me read and digest the posts for the last couple of days (I have been out all day) and jump back into the fray. But I would prefer to get the discussion more up to date. We all know that western societies were patriarchal; the role of the woman was secondary at best. I would be interested in looking at those women from classical history up to say 1900 - who did manage to rise above the usual role. What was it about these women that made men respect them and elevate them. Robby may have already answered this question.

Justin
April 24, 2003 - 02:23 pm
The respectable woman of Greek society may have worn her role in life with pride even though she be deprived of external power. We see some of that today. There are hausfraus who bow to the will of a husband, who leave the house only to shop, who take pride in their ability to manage a household, and pride in their power to provide delicious meals, who find pleasure in an afternoon at the piano, but leave all external things to her husband. A small, secure world can be very comfy. However, these woman suffer greatly, when the husband dies prematurely.

My grandmother was born in Ireland in 1840. She married my grandfather at the end of the Civil War. She had her last child, the ninth, in 1881. Her husband died of the flu in 1880. She was illiterate, unable to write her name. Alone, destitute, without the aid of a man, she managed her household, by sending the older children out to work and doing piece work at home for a local seamstress. My father was the youngest, the baby. I knew her in the late Twenties and early Thirties. Her children had found a Civil War widow's pension for her and forced her to retire. She signed the pension roles with an X. She died in the winter after living 97 years. I remember how cold the cemetery was the day of the funeral. Grandma was my first experience with death. Later in life, I realized this tiny little old lady had achieved great things in her world.

gaj
April 24, 2003 - 05:28 pm
I have always wondered why men needed to make women subservant(sp?). I have many books on what could be called Women Studies. Did women once rule (other than as Amazons)? What is true history? Hasn't it beensaid that the winners write the history. They of course tell the tale from their own perspective. When did women loose the battle?

Malryn (Mal)
April 24, 2003 - 06:34 pm
GREEK WOMEN WARRIORS

3kings
April 25, 2003 - 02:14 am
MAL a few posts back you suggested that your life would have been easier if you had a partner to help plan the way ahead. Maybe. But there are also advantages in being able to follow your own desires, and not having to continually consider the rights and feelings of a partner.

I guess both situations have their advantages, and disadvantages. Whatever our lot in life, many think: " I wish things were different". People do not always long for change in their circumstances, true, but they sometimes do.-- Trevor

Malryn (Mal)
April 25, 2003 - 02:23 am

Trevor, I had a husband for twenty-five years, and I know what you're talking about. Still, it seems sometimes as if it would be nice to have someone who'd carry those heavy bags of groceries for me. ; )

Mal

georgehd
April 25, 2003 - 09:11 am
I have never been truly alone and I believe that one of my great fears is being alone. I think that in most married relationships that I know, i.e. people our age, the man is more dependent and the woman less so. My impression is personal and reflects as much as anything the society in which I grew up and lived in for seventy years. I see in my children a very different situation - one in which the husband and wife are more co dependent and hence more independent. I think that this is healthy and reflects the changing roles of husband and wife in our society.

Malryn (Mal)
April 25, 2003 - 09:58 am

I remember sitting in the living room of the trailer I bought in Florida five years after my marriage ended. I had moved 1000 miles away from my family and anyone I knew; my furniture had not arrived, and only one chair and a spring and mattress furnished the place. I thought to myself, "Marilyn, what have you done?" (That was before all three of my kids came to Florida carrying their own baggage of problems and knocked on my door.) I've known people in similar alone situations who have packed up and gone back where they came from.

I've been truly alone many times in the past 28 years. When it got to me, I'd go out to dinner or to the mall just to be near people.

I'm not really alone now, since I live in an apartment which adjoins my daughter's studio that is attached to her house. I see my daughter for an hour a day, but because I can't get out without help any more, I am alone the other 23. This computer is a godsend; so are the electronic publishing and writing I do. If my mind is occupied, I am fine.

I think perhaps older women are better able to cope alone because the minute their children grow up and leave home, they are alone most of the time, unless, of course, they go out to work.

It's not so bad, George, as long as you keep yourself as busy as you can.

Mal

Justin
April 25, 2003 - 02:58 pm
I think about being alone too, George, and I don't relish the idea. But I have three daughters who make pests of themselves checking on the old folks. Fortunately, my wife and I are still healthy. I think, Mal's problem is she is confined to a wheel chair and that must be very hard. But she seems to have adjusted to it very well. She is an inspiration to all of us "old folks". Robby is also an inspiration as a guy who is still practicing Clinical Psych at 81.

Justin
April 25, 2003 - 03:07 pm
The women of Greece had Amazons in their mythology but modern American women are warriors in the true sense. Two women were POWs in the recent conflict and I am sure the military will catch some flak over that. It will probably keep the gals out of fire fights for some time to come. In my judgement, pound for pound, women at that age are smarter than men and since wars are becoming more technological, women will find many more tasks that they can do without proscription.

Malryn (Mal)
April 25, 2003 - 03:41 pm

Thanks, Justin. But . . . what else can one do when there isn't a choice?
Remarkable Robby is 82. For more about him, please click the link below.

Humility by Dr. Robert Bancker Iadeluca

Malryn (Mal)
April 25, 2003 - 04:25 pm

Amazons of the Ancient World

Justin
April 25, 2003 - 06:20 pm
The respectable women of Greece who were in a abusive relatioship were really trapped. Divorce was possible but only by the husband. The woman had to appeal to an Archon for release. Then what. There were no open roads.

Today I read in the paper that a woman fabricates a story about an attack to protect a suspected abusive husband. However, anyone familiar with such cases knows the abused woman worries about what will happen the next time she upsets her abuser. By lying, the woman is not protecting the man but protecting herself from a violent reprisal. Women in abusive homes often believe they are trapped and can not escape their terror. They often have low self esteem and lack the knowledge to know they can survive outside their current situations. I am sure few people realize that homocide is the leading cause of death for pregnant women.

gaj
April 25, 2003 - 07:20 pm
I just dug out one of my books on women. It is titled A History of Women: From Ancieent Goddesses to Christian Saints. It contains essays on women by women. Tonight I am too tired to type in any quotes, but will try tomorrow.

Malryn (Mal)
April 25, 2003 - 08:06 pm

The more the merrier, Ginny Ann. That would be great!

Mal

Malryn (Mal)
April 25, 2003 - 08:36 pm

HEKATE

Éloïse De Pelteau
April 26, 2003 - 06:22 am
George, you said: "We all know that western societies were patriarchal; the role of the woman was secondary at best."

If we asked a thousand women to see if they feel that their role is secondary to men, I don't think that they all feel second to men. Perhaps if men asked their wife that question, if she says yes, it is because men have not elevated her to her rightful place where she can feel equal. It is a man’s perception that women are inferior. Women don’t feel inferior to men. Apart from having enough money, the vast majority of women are usually content. Most of us have felt we had the best role in raising our children from birth to age 7 or 8 when a person’s character is set for the future. Without a degree women can have children who become superior women, kings, conquerors, presidents, great composers, artists successful in business. Women fare better than men in University new studies have shown. I never thought I had the second role in my life and I am quite content at this stage that I have done a good job.

Eloïse

Malryn (Mal)
April 26, 2003 - 08:30 am
To go on with the section on Ancient Greek women in Life of Greece by Durant. Durant says:
"In the home she is honored and obeyed in everything that does not contravene the patriarchal authority of her mate. She keeps the house, or superintends its management; she cooks the meals, cards and spins the wool, makes the clothing and bedding for the family. Her education is almost confined to household arts, for the Athenian believes with Euripides that a woman is handicapped by intellect. The result is that the respectable women of Athens are more modest, more "charming" to men, than their like in Sparta, but less interesting and mature, incapable of being comrades to husbands whose minds have been filled and sharpened by a free and varied life. The women of sixth century Greece contributed significantly to Greek literature; the women of Periclean Athens contribute nothing."

Malryn (Mal)
April 26, 2003 - 08:36 am
"Toward the end of the period a movement arises for the emancipation of woman. Euripides defends the sex with brave speeches and timid innuendoes; Aristophanes makes fun of them with boisterous indecency. The women go to the heart of the matter and begin to compete with the hetairai in making themselves as attractive as the progress of chemistry will permit. 'What sensible thing are we women capable of doing?' asks Cleonia in Aristophanes' Lysistrata. 'We do nothing but sit around with our paint and lipstick and transparent gowns, and all the rest of it.' From 411 onward female roles become more prominent in Athenian drama, and reveal the growing escape of women from the solitude to which they have been confined."

georgehd
April 26, 2003 - 08:43 am
Eloise - your post 378 - I think that you misinterpreted what I wrote. I used the past tense and was not referring to the present day role of a woman.

Éloïse De Pelteau
April 26, 2003 - 02:21 pm
George, sorry if I misunderstood you. I had in the back of my mind what Durant had written on this a few days ago and I should have referred to his quote rather than yours.

I think that it is impossible to speak of equality between men and women because you can't compare two totally different things. They each have their role to play and both have pros and cons.

I believe that Ancient Greek men had to strive in making their wives happy and content as much as modern men do because as Fifi mentioned, a woman can be a formidable adversary.

Eloïse

3kings
April 26, 2003 - 04:52 pm
ELOISE yes, as both you and FIFI remarked, women can be formidable adversaries. This because a wife can exclude her husband, not from the house, but from the family home. She can effectively ban him from the close family relationship he desires with his children and sometimes his wife.

It is anxiety that this might happen, that empowers a wife over her husband. Of course there are some men to whom such an eventuality is of no account. It is in such homes that wife beating and dysfunctional relationships occur== Trevor

Justin
April 26, 2003 - 11:20 pm
Aristofanes in his work Lysistrada, had to ignore the role of the hetairai when he gave the power of the bed to respectable women. When the women locked things up, the men were forced to give up their war games. Some of the youngest ladies were very effective once they got the hang of it. I may have mentioned it earlier, but when I first saw the play it was staged in the Museum of Art in San Francisco. That was in 1946. Legitimate theatres were fearful of public disapproval. My, how we have changed.

Malryn (Mal)
April 27, 2003 - 07:04 am

I have to laugh. When I read Trevor's post in my tired haze last night I thought he said women even banned men from the family room. I pondered awhile thinking about that, but guessed Trevor knew what he was talking about.

I never thought of myself as an adversary when I was married, but I certainly felt as if I had one. It seemed as if the minute I got myself and my family settled in a house I'd managed to make into a home for them, my husband came home and said, "I've been transferred to another state several hundred miles away, and I'm selling the house. Start packing."

Women of my era whose husbands worked for large corporations found themselves in the same predicament in the 60's and 70's. Job transfers were common, and if the wage earner wanted to improve his lot by accepting a better job, he moved himself and his family on.

No amount of objecting on my part made a bit of difference. I came to know that we'd be moving every five years, sometimes more often than that. It was hard on me. It was hard on the kids. Since my husband moved from one laboratory to another, either to do research or to be the head of it, it was easier for him because he'd met many of the people with whom he'd work, at various meetings and conferences, while the children and I knew no one.

That brings something else to mind. My husband traveled for his jobs a great deal of the time. This left me alone with the responsibility of the house and everything concerned with it, as well as the responsibility of the three kids. I was boss when the Boss was away. The minute he walked back in the door, I was relegated to a much lesser rôle. I know there are many, many women who went through what I did at that time. It wasn't the best way to live for any of us.

I wonder if the way I felt was similar to Ancient Greek women who saw their men off to war, and held down the fort at home while waiting for their husbands to return.

Rather than an adversary, I think it would be much better to be married to someone who was a sharing companion with all the give and take that implies. I don't know if such a thing exists in marriage, but, based on my own experience, I most certainly hope it does.

Mal

Malryn (Mal)
April 27, 2003 - 07:35 am

I've posted this before.
The text of Lysistrata by Aristophanes

gaj
April 27, 2003 - 10:28 am
"Claudine Leduc...Her basic assumption is that, from the time of Homer to the classical period, Greek marriage was organized as gift-giving: the gift included not only the bride but certain items of property."

Women were considered property! And had to have property given to a man by her male giver. How any society could prosper when more than 1/2 of its population was considered property boggles my mind.

Éloïse De Pelteau
April 27, 2003 - 11:36 am
True love.

I would like to say in the end that when a couple have been married 40 to 50 years, that has to be the ultimate in ideal relationship between a man and a woman. I see many of those around me and it warms my heart to notice that they can overcome the constant differences and the constant struggle to adapt still profoundly caring for each other until the end.

I think that the Durants had such a marriage. They were different in more ways than gender and it cannot be verified, but just the fact that they stuck it out through thick and thin is one indication that they didn't pursue only their own goals, but respected also the goals of the other.

At one point in a long marriage, one becomes the mirror image of the other knowing exactly what each thinks, feels, needs, is going to say every moment of the day and it becomes unnecessary to even talk. I have seen many such marriages.

Often when the wife dies first, the husband goes soon after. Two old couples who were neighbors mine died within a year or two of each other recently.

Eloïse

Malryn (Mal)
April 27, 2003 - 02:34 pm

Women were considered property here in the United States, up to and beyond 1951 when I was married, and our society has prospered. Even today, some men here consider their wives to be their property, easily acquired and just as easily thrown out.

Mal

Malryn (Mal)
April 27, 2003 - 07:53 pm
Click the link below to see some pictures posted by Raymond Franz of our red-sweatered leader, Robby Iadeluca, who attended the Virginia Tea Party today with some SeniorNet friends. Robby's computer may be out of commission, but as you see, Robby is not.

Robby and the Virginia Tea Party. Scroll down.

Justin
April 27, 2003 - 10:37 pm
My wife and I celebrated our fiftieth year of marriage last October. We still discuss events, music, books we are reading, current news, the children, health, who said what at parties, and our feelings about things. Many of the things we say, we have said before. So what? Conversation sparks our lives.

I travelled a great deal in my job and transferred perhaps five times in twenty years. My wife ran the home show, whether I was home or not. At least, that's how I thought about it. I think I will ask her to comment on that thought.

Éloïse De Pelteau
April 28, 2003 - 03:28 am
Justin, you and your wife have been truly blessed. Let me congratulate you on your 50th wedding anniversary. Thank you for sharing this example of true love with us.

We would be honoured to have your wife join us in this discussion.

Eloïse

Malryn (Mal)
April 28, 2003 - 05:31 am

Some people mesh; others do not. The man I married was a New England patriarch who was critical of women when he thought they were not being his idea of a "lady". I have always been more of a free spirited person than not. Two more different types of people you will never meet. There was no way that childhood romance could have lasted longer than it did.

He remarried fairly soon. I, of course, did not. One of my sons once said to me that if I had married again and had more of the comforts, opportunity to travel, etc. that money can bring I'd never have accomplished what I have in the past 28 years.

The creative work I do now is what I always wanted to be able to do when I was married, but in some eyes it was never "good enough". That was a serious deterrent. I'm inclined to think my son's statement was right.

Mal

Malryn (Mal)
April 28, 2003 - 05:46 am
"Through it all the real influence of woman over man continues, making her subjection largely unreal. The greater eagerness of the male gives woman an advantage in Greece as elsewhere. 'Sir,' says Samuel Johnson, 'nature has given woman so much power that the law cannot afford to give her more.' Sometimes this natural sovereignty is enhanced by a substantial dowry, or an industrious tongue, or uxorious affection; more often it is the result of beauty, or the bearing and rearing of children, or the slow fusion of souls in the crucible of a common experience and task. An age that can portray such gentle characters as Antigone, Alcestis, Medea, could not be unaware of the highest and deepest in woman. The average Athenian loves his wife, and will not try to conceal it; the funeral stelae reveal surprisingly the tenderness of mate for mate, and of parents for children, in the intimacy of the home. The Greek Anthology is vivid with erotic verse, but it contains also many a touching epigram to a beloved comrade. 'In this stone,' says one epitaph, 'Marathonis laid Nicopolis, and bedewed the marble chest with tears. But it was of no avail. What profit hath a man whose wife is gone, and who is left solitary on earth?' "

Éloïse De Pelteau
April 28, 2003 - 07:03 am
Mal, that is a beautiful quote.

My beloved son-in-law asked me yesterday if I would be doing the same thing I am doing now if I was still married and I emphatically said: no, because I give everything I have to whatever is in my immediate proximity. I have become totally different since I have lost my husband. I don't think I am better, just different. To those who have a good marriage, I say guard it with your life, it is the most precious thing on earth.

Eloïse

Malryn (Mal)
April 28, 2003 - 07:21 am

I think I am the most precious thing on earth, and I guard myself with my life. It took me a long time to believe this, but now I know it has to be.

Recently I wrote to a friend who has been very ill. The minute she began to feel better she wanted to jump right back into helping other people in the way she did before she was sick. I told her that if she didn't put herself first, there was no possible way she could help anyone else.

Women of my generation and before were raised to be selfless. By doing this they lost their identity and didn't understand what I've said above -- that you must care for yourself first or you'll be able to do nothing for anyone else.

Mal

gaj
April 28, 2003 - 05:39 pm
Thinking about the ancient Greek men, it is good that many of them did love their wives and treat them fairly. The problems arose with inheritance laws, custody of the children, and other legal issues. How a man treated his wife while he was living may not be how she is treated if happens to die before her. If women are considered property how can they be the ones to raise their children if the man is no longer there? Property taking care of property?

Malryn (Mal)
April 28, 2003 - 06:12 pm

I believe we have read that the brother of the widow's dead husband married her when his brother died, whether he already had a wife or not. If there was no brother, another male relative of the husband married her and took care of her and her children. I have also read that Ancient Greek widows had much more freedom than wives of living husbands. Widows were allowed to go outside the home with only the stipulation that they wore black to signify their widowhood.

According to Mahlia, this is similar to what still happens today in Islamic countries. The brother of the deceased marries the widow and assumes responsibility for her and her children.

The next two sub-topics in Life of Greece are "The Home" and "Old Age". Perhaps we'll learn more about Ancient Greek women from them.

Mal

3kings
April 28, 2003 - 10:50 pm
MALRYN I agree. One must help one's self, before one can take care of others. So first, secure your own well being, before trying to help others. It is only by having a secure base, that one can aid one's fellows.

That was what Chamberlain was trying to do. Build up his own military strength before confronting Hitler. Unfortunately for his plans, the German armies struck Poland long before the British were ready. It damn near lost them the war. In the case of France, it did entail their loss. I sometimes wonder, what the outcome would have been had Japan attacked the US in September 1939 and not delayed until 1941? A Pacific stalemate perhaps..=== Trevor

Justin
April 28, 2003 - 11:28 pm
If Japan had attacked the US in Sept. 1939, I would have missed the opening salvos for I was sixteen that year. Thank goodness they waited until I was ready. The US was no less ready in 1939 than in 1941. We were protected by a cadre of military- Naval as well as Army. A draft did not get underway until 1940 and then the forces had to train with brooms instead of rifles. We did'nt know what we were doing in 1941. vis a vis the mess before and after the Pearl Harbour attack.

On the question of Chamberlain, it's difficult to defend his negative position on armaments and military training throughout all of the 1930s decade. It may be that he had delay in mind when he talked to Hitler at Munich but I doubt it very much. When he stepped from the plane waving that piece of paper, I am sure he thought he had achieved peace in our time. The poor guy was just deluded. He was not prepared to negotiate with Hitler. He must have known he was dealing from weakness. Churchill told him often enough and he told Churchill often enough to go away and not bother him. (Churchill's reputation was not very effective as a military advisor after Galipoli.) Getting a stay of execution from Herr Hitler at that time must have been to Chamberlain like finding the holy grail. If he thought it was a deferrment giving prepararion time he did not indicate it at the time. When Poland fell, he knew he had been had. Also that Winston had been right all along.

Justin
April 28, 2003 - 11:43 pm
France I think, was another problem. The civilian power structure was weakly constructed and badly advised by aging heros. There were too many cooks in the kitchen. The Maginot line was not infallible it was breached by an end run, and the lessons of WW1. had been ignored. De Gaulle's advice on tank warfare was shunted to the dust bin. Fortunately Patton had read de Gaulle's papers and enlarged upon them greatly. Hitler's honchos came to the same conclusions and invented Blitzkreig.

Bubble
April 29, 2003 - 12:11 am
Mal, in Jewish law too, the widow should be remarried to the brother of her deceased husband, it is a duty for him. Should she want to marry someone else, the brother has to agree first and give her a "release" to do so.



I suppose it is also written in the rules of conducts somewhere in the Bibble. I cannot check now: visitors at home and all my ref. books are out of bound for the duration.

Justin
April 29, 2003 - 12:14 am
I have been reading Mitchell Carroll, Chair of Classical Philology at George Washington U. on the subject of Greek women. He makes the point that the social position of the Athenian woman was far inferior to that of her sisters in the Heroic age. Despite the boasted democracy and freedom of thought in the years of Republican Athens, women's status was a reproach to the advanced culture.

We don't have to search far to find the causes, he says. The chief of these is the Greek idea of the city state. Citizenship was hereditary. The Union from which a child sprung must be one approved by the state. Pericles limited citizenship to those who were born of two Athenian parents. Greater stress was laid on the citizenship of the mother than on that of the father. To preserve the purity of citizenship in a city with a large foreign and noncitizen population, every precaution was taken that the daughters of Athens should not be wedded to foreigners, and that no spurious offspring should be palmed off on the state.

Marriage therefore lay at the very basis of the state. These obligations demanded that the women of Athens should conform to customs which would fit them to be the mothers of citizens and keep them from every entangling intrigue with strangers.

One result of this policy was the development of two classes of women. One carefully secluded and restricted and the other free to do what ever it pleased. Thus, owing to the Athenian conception of the city-state, the natural functions of women, domesticity and companionship, normally united in one person, were divided with the Athenian man looking to his wife for domestic duties and to the hetaera for comradship and intellectual sympathy.

This evil was a canker worm which gnawed on the core of the social life of Athens and caused the unhappiness of the female sex.

Malryn (Mal)
April 29, 2003 - 02:23 am

I woke up much, much too early and came in to find five posts in here. That was a pleasant surprise.

Our discussion leader is supposed to have his new computer today and come back to this discussion. I don't know why I always feel as if it's my responsibility to keep this forum rolling when Robby is away, but I do. It's probably the same thing that compelled me to volunteer to be chairman of this and that committee when others more wisely sat on their hands. The difference there was that often I didn't really care about what happened to the group I invariably ended up jumping in to try and save, and here I care a great deal. I don't know about you, but I've gotten a lot out of this Story of Civilization discussion from the minute it began.

When Robby left us with the topic of "Woman", meaning Ancient Athenian women, I didn't know what we'd find to talk about for 7 days because there's so little that's really known about them except for the hetairai. I kept wishing the topic had been art.

It's obvious that we did find things to discuss -- even World War II and the fact that Justin would have missed the opening salvos because he was only 16 in 1939. That was a surprise, too, because here on the eve of my 75th birthday in July I thought I was the oldest one here. Except for Robby, of course, but Robby will always be less than 35. Anyway, we've managed to get through six leaderless days.

I have to admit that sometimes I become exasperated with women because so many of them talk a lot about their situations and the rôles society has forced them to play for centuries and don't do anything but wait for someone to come along and change things. I want to tell them to put up or shut up half the time.

Imagine what would have happened if those Greek women behind closed doors had gotten together and done what Aristophanes suggested in "Lysistrata". The history of Greece would have been quite different.

Women today claim they hate war. I notice that when the Big Boy Leaders decide there has to be one that the gals follow right along. We women could be a very powerful voice in this world if we got in step; practiced what we preach and broke a few too-persistent traditions. While at the same time enjoying men, I must add. In my book, it's not necessary to dislike men to achieve independent female goals.

Now I have to stop and make the major decision about whether to go back to bed or write a book. I think I just came up with an idea for one, don't you? It's not exactly original, but it certainly would be fun to write.

Okay, that's enough of what I can't even call Midnight Ramblings, a mighty good jazz tune. Thanks from me to all of us. I'm mighty proud of this group.

Mal

Malryn (Mal)
April 29, 2003 - 03:41 am
I think I jumped the gun. Today's only Tuesday. Robby should be back tomorrow.

Mal

Malryn (Mal)
April 29, 2003 - 04:35 am

Food on Pottery. Click thumbnail picture for larger ones

Malryn (Mal)
April 29, 2003 - 04:52 am

Women by Semonides of Amorgos

georgehd
April 29, 2003 - 11:36 am
Mal, first of all, I agree that this is a marvelous discussion group. Second, you filled in admirably during Robby's absence. Third, your poem by Semonides is too good to be true. My wife had her bridge group over today and one of the women had a birthday. I presented her with a copy of the poem - actually a perfect gift for her. It caused lots of laughter.

Malryn (Mal)
April 29, 2003 - 12:23 pm

George, I'm glad you, your wife, her birthday friend and the other women enjoyed the poem by Semonides. I almost didn't post it, in the fear that some people would be offended or insulted. Oh, dem Ancient Greeks and their Sense a Yuma!

Say, I didn't fill in for Robby. Nobody could ! It's all of us together who make this discussion group what it is.

Now to see what's going on in here. The power went off again (@%&!XX*!*) this morning, and cable was out until just now. I've missed out on nearly six hours of tasty gossip and news!

P.S. Flies don't winter over in houses with no central heating in Massachusetts. They land sometime in late May or June. Somebody had to plant them there. Who's the scientist in the Dante Club?

Mal

georgehd
April 29, 2003 - 02:05 pm
Mal, you got me laughing again. When did flies enter into the discussion of ancient Greece? They must buzz through the server at Senior Net and get into different discussions like a virus.

But this inadvertant post makes me wonder, what were the Greeks' views of heaven and hell? Have we discussed that topic yet? And does Durant discuss it somewhere? Remember I do not have the book yet.

Malryn (Mal)
April 29, 2003 - 02:17 pm

Well, like I was running around trying to catch up and I meandered over to Dante Land to see what I'd been missing while the power was off, George. That's how come the flies buzzed in.

Justin knows all about heaven and hell all over the place. Two to one he'll post about the Greek inferno and paradiso later on in the day. That's what people get for living on the West coast. You're always late for everything.

The Cayman Islands are a bit of a trip off the West coast of England; isn't that right, George?

Mal

georgehd
April 29, 2003 - 02:25 pm
Mal, the Cayman Islands (there are three) are about an hour south of Miami, below Cuba and to the west of Jamaica. Until the mid 60's Cayman was under the control of Jamaica and when Jamaica became independent, Cayman elected to remain a British protectorate. While we have an English Governour, the government is run by locally elected politicians.

We have very few if any Greeks here. Not too many flies.

Malryn (Mal)
April 29, 2003 - 02:30 pm
That's what a friend of mine who has a vacation place in Puerto Rico told me over the phone Friday night. Those islands are still off the West coast of England, aren't they, George? Just like Massachusetts and North Carolina, I mean.

Too bad you don't have any Greeks or many flies. You could take care of two discussion birds with one stone if you did.

Mal

Justin
April 29, 2003 - 11:32 pm
Durant discusses heaven and hell all over the place. In greek mythology Demeter and Hades are the gods of the underworld. The underworld is the place of the dead. When good and evil came along one thought separate places would be nice. Hell became the place of the damned. The rest of the folks moved upstairs. Hell is ruled by Gehenna, sometimes referred to as the bad angel or devil.

Heaven on the other hand, is one of the realms of Greek cosmology. The Greeks called it Olympus, some call it the Elysian Fields. Dante calls it Paradise, The Brahmans talk about Nirvanna. The realm in short is an abode of a deity. It is known for an absence of sin and for that reason it is a place I should like to avoid. There wouldn't be much fun in life or in death for that matter without sin.

You can visit hell on the senior net. We discussants have been in hell now for several weeks. Click on the Inferno and share the heat with us.

Bubble
April 30, 2003 - 12:00 am
Mal, I tooo was curious and went to have a look:

http://www.odci.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/cj.html



Even Hell was a place to visit in Greeks time: remember Orpheus and Eurydices

georgehd
April 30, 2003 - 12:30 am
With Robby away, we seem to have gone afield. Hell was not mentioned in sea bubble's post, but it really is a spot here about a mile or two from where I sit. The name came from the fact that there is a lot of black exposed coral there and if you walk around and look around, you get the impression of being in Hell. Though I have never been impressed. It is a great tourist attraction because there is a Hell post office and one can send cards to loved ones from Hell.

thanks for the post about the Greek notion of heaven and hell. Justin, I am already in the Inferno discussion but not saying too much. I am about fifty posts behind the group.

Bubble
April 30, 2003 - 12:54 am
Hi George from nearby-Hell. I have seen you in the Abraham's discussion (we have the same outlook) and in Pi's. Do you raise lots of caimans over there?



Surely for the Greeks, Heaven and Hell were for Gods and Heroes and not a place for the common of mortals? Did Socrates expect to end there after dead?

Malryn (Mal)
April 30, 2003 - 07:04 am

After Bubble posted here, there was a suicide bombing in Israel. She has posted in the Writers Exchange WREX discussion that she's all right.

Bubble is a strong, courageous woman, a real survivor. In a wheelchair much of the time, she had the same paralyzing illness that I did when she was two years old, and wears two full leg braces, not one like me. I admire Bubble. She is an inspiration to me to stop fooling around and get myself up out of this wheelchair, tuck those crutches under my arms and walk. Better still, do some housework. Bubble did a whole lot of cleaning for Passover. I should be ashamed of myself.

George, I think it's all right if we have gone a bit afield. During the time our discussion leader has been without a computer, we have pretty much stuck to the topic of Woman. I typed out here the rest of that section of Life of Greece. When Robby returns he'll lead us into the next sub-topic section which is titled "The Home".

With the Dante's Inferno discussion and the discussion about The Dante Club I am witnessing an extreme emphasis on Hell in Books and Lit right now. Thank goodness I now know where it's located and can stop stewing about it. Heaven knows I'll never get to the Cayman Islands.

Mal

Malryn (Mal)
April 30, 2003 - 07:31 am

Scroll down to see how Ancient Greeks saw the world

Malryn (Mal)
April 30, 2003 - 07:34 am

Ancient Greek Gods

Malryn (Mal)
April 30, 2003 - 07:37 am
Map of the Underworld

Malryn (Mal)
April 30, 2003 - 07:42 am
House of Hades

Malryn (Mal)
April 30, 2003 - 07:45 am

Mt. Olympus

Malryn (Mal)
April 30, 2003 - 08:03 am

Excluding this one, there have been 67 posts in the past week. I guess we've done all right, after all. Won't Robby have a good time reading all of them?

Mal

Bubble
April 30, 2003 - 08:33 am
Do you gather that after all the dancing and food tasting Robby will find a welcomed relax in sitting and reading about women in Greece and elsewhere?



Welcome back Robby!

Malryn (Mal)
April 30, 2003 - 09:05 am

This is always what comes to my mind when I think about Hell. It is the third panel of a triptych painted by Hieronymous Bosch, which is called "The Garden of Earthly Delights".

Hell by Hieronymous Bosch

robert b. iadeluca
April 30, 2003 - 10:10 am
Well, here it is April 30 and guess who is back? Just as promised (or threatened!) My new computer was installed about a half hour ago and of course this is the first place I went to on the Internet. I have loads of emails to answer but I sent them off a quick message explaining why I was gone and that I would get back to them.

My friendly local computer guru fulfilled his promise. He put together a CPU with all the accoutrements (I love that word!) of the latest Dell and even more. The cost was $1000. Included in this was Microsoft 98 (second edition) which he tells me was the best because Microsoft 2000 Pro and XP still have bugs to be ironed out. Obviously there was no handling and shipping cost that I would have had by buying from Dell and I have a 3-year warranty. In addition, he came to my house and installed the whole shebang and tested it out at no cost. I am so lucky to have someone like him in town and I always tells him so.

Whenever my computer goes out, I have withdrawal symptoms but this time I did not have the time to experience that. My last posting here was last Wednesday, April 23, and that same afternoon I left for Northern Virginia to attend the semi-annual Virginia Psychological Conference. All day Thursday I attended a seminar on Ethics in psychological practice. That evening I attended a meeting of the Association Board of which I am a member. I am the chairman of the Colleague Assistance Committee which assists "impaired psychologists."

For the last ten years I have been a Red Cross Volunteer helping wherever there was an emotional need. If there was a local problem, e.g. a house fire, I might be called upon to help out the families with their sudden traumatic problems. At times I would be called to go to the National Disaster Operations Center in Arlington where I would defuse or debrief, not the victims of various national disasters, but the Red Cross workers who had been taking care of these victims all over the nation and were now back carrying stresses of their own from what they had seen or done. My original certification with the Red Cross had been in 1993 so my Friday and Saturday was spent in a two-day recertification course given by Red Cross officials. The American Red Cross has a "statement of agreement" with the American Psychological Association.

On Sunday I attended the annual Virginia "Tea Party" as was shown in the links to the photos by Ray Franz. Twelve people had planned to attend but due to illnesses and distances to travel, we had a total of seven but had a wonderful time from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. I guess we were all talked out after 3 hours. The local Chamber of Commerce furnished a Fauquier County T-shirt to each person.

Monday and yesterday consisted of seeing patients from early in the day to 8 p.m. in order to make up for patients I hadn't seen on Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday. This morning I was at a Chamber of Commerce meeting at 8 a.m., my computer friend was at my house at 10 a.m. and here I am now. So you see there was no time this past week for "withdrawal."

I clicked in here to find 78 postings. I have read them all but will get back later to examine some of the links. You are a marvelous group and I was not a bit surprised to see how active you were while I was gone. That is the way a discussion group should be. It should not be a "one-person cult." Thank you again, Mal, for passing more of Durant's words along and sharing wonderful links so the discussion would continue.

In a few minutes I will change the GREEN quotes above and we will move onto Durant's next section -- "The Home."

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
April 30, 2003 - 10:27 am
"The Greek family, like the Indo-European household in general, is composed of the father, the mother, sometimes a 'second wife,' their unmarried daughters, their sons, their slaves, and their sons' wives and children, and slaves. Both in agriculture and in industry, the family is the unit and instrument of economic production.

"The power of the father in Attica is extensive, but much narrower than in Rome. He can expose the newborn child, sell the labor of his minor sons and unwedded daughters, give his daughters in marriage, and, under certain conditions, appoint another husband for his widow. But he cannot, in Athenian law, sell the persons of his children, and each son, on marrying, escapes from parental authority, sets up his own home, and becoms an independent member of the gene."

I am not a woman and, therefore, have never been a mother but I wonder about the feelings of a new mother who watches her husband "expose" the newly born child to death.

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
April 30, 2003 - 10:30 am
You're back! It's good to see you, Robby, after your busy busy week.

Mal

georgehd
April 30, 2003 - 10:34 am
Welcome back Robby. And a big THANK YOU to Mal for those wonderful links. This group is so interesting and resourceful.

Robby, you raise the question of the father "exposing" the child and you added to death. I was wondering under what conditions such an action would be taken; does Durant say anything about this? And I was also wondering in what way the power of the Greek father was more narrow than the Roman father.

Having been part of the Abraham discussion, I note that the family was important and that the society was patriarchal before the Greek civilization.

I was also wondering if the rule of the father was codified in a set of laws or was the practice just traditional.

I also think it interesting that in most contemporary households the man is considered the head of the house and the wife the power behind the throne. (I know that this is not true of all families today) Are there any societies where the woman is in charge of the family?

Éloïse De Pelteau
April 30, 2003 - 10:50 am
Welcome back Robby. We were very well looked after by our Mal and the others who kept us entertained and informed while you were gone.

Malryn (Mal)
April 30, 2003 - 02:51 pm
An opinion about Robby's question. A female child would know from childhood that babies who were not considered physically acceptable would be exposed to the elements until they died, and probably witnessed such things happening from an early age. Because of this, it would seem perfectly natural to her that a baby of hers would face the same fate if at birth it showed obvious signs of not being what was considered normal. We have to think about that as the Ancient Greeks did, not from our quite different 21st century Western point-of-view.

As an example: I was what is today called a "latchkey child". People posted in another discussion about how terrible that must have been. I told them, no, it wasn't, because it was normal for me, and I didn't know any other way of being. These people weren't wearing my shoes and didn't understand. In the above case, we must put on Greek sandals and transport ourselves back to that time to know how those mothers must have felt.

Mal

Malryn (Mal)
April 30, 2003 - 02:58 pm

Layout of Ancient Greek houses

Malryn (Mal)
April 30, 2003 - 03:14 pm

Rich man's Ancient Greek house

robert b. iadeluca
May 1, 2003 - 04:20 am
"Country gardens are more spacious and nemerous but the scarcity of rain in summer, and the cost of irrigation, make gardens a luxury in Attica. The average Greek has no Rousseauan sensitivity to nature. His mountains are still too troublesome to be beautiful, though his poets, despite its dangers, intone many paeans to the sea.

"He is not sentimental about nature, so much as animistically imaginative. He peoples the woods and streams of his country with gods and sprites, and thinks of nature as not a landscape but a Valhalla. He names his mountains and rivers from the divinities that inhabit them and instead of painting nature directly he draws or carves ssymbolic images of the deities that in his poetic theology give it life. Not until Alexander's armies bring back Persian ways and gold will the Greek build himself a pleasure garden or 'paradise.'

"Nevertheless, flowers are loved in Greece as much as anywhere, and gardens and florists supply them all the year round. Flower girls peddle roses, violets, hyacinths, narcissi, irises, myrtles, lilacs, croscuses, and anemones from house to house.

"Women wear flowers in their hair, dandies wear them behind the ear, and on festal occasions both sexes may come forth with flower garlands, lei-like around the neck."

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
May 1, 2003 - 04:26 am
"Home is where the Heart is."

robert b. iadeluca
May 1, 2003 - 04:41 am
HOME SWEET HOME

by John Howard Payne

Mid pleasures and palaces though we may roam,
Be it ever so humble, there's no place like home;
A charm from the sky seems to hallow us there,
Which, seek through the world, is ne'er met with elsewhere.

Home! Home! sweet Home!

There's no place like Home, there's no place like Home!

An exile from home, splendor dazzles in vain;
O, give me my lowly thatched cottage again!
The birds singing gaily, that came at my call -
Give me them - and the peace of mind, dearer than all!

Home! Home! sweet, sweet Home!

There's no place like Home! there's no place like Home!



How sweet 'tis to sit 'neath a fond father's smile,
And the cares of a mother to soothe and beguile!
Let others delight mid new pleasures to roam,
But give me, oh give me, the pleasures of home!

Home! Home! sweet, sweet Home!

There's no place like Home! there's no place like Home!



To thee I'll return, overburdened with care;
The heart's dearest solace will smile on me there;
No more from the cottage again will I roam;
Be it ever so humble there's no place like home.

Home! Home! sweet, sweet Home!
There's no place like Home! there's no place like Home!

robert b. iadeluca
May 1, 2003 - 05:36 am
FLOWERS

Malryn (Mal)
May 1, 2003 - 06:59 am
Below is a link to many, many interesting pages about Ancient Greek gardens. Click NEXT at the bottom of each page to see more.

History of Ancient Greek Gardens

robert b. iadeluca
May 1, 2003 - 07:17 am
The first line in the link Mal gave us reads:--"The Ancient Greeks were filled with amazement when they first beheld the magnificent parks of Eastern potentates. Their own civilisation had produced nothing to compare with the achievements of these mighty satraps and imperial kings."

The paragraph goes on to explain why. However, this placed sort of a half-thought in my mind which I will try to communicate as best I can. Ancient Greek civilization, if I understand Durant correctly, was the first one that moved us toward the democracy we know today. It concentrated more on the intellect than on emotion. Its gods were similar to humans. It had a down-to-earth "practical" approach. It spent less time thinking of the "after-life" than on every-day affairs.

Now -- this got me to thinking. Is Western culture more "left brained" and Eastern culture more "right brained?" Have we in the West "advanced" from our point of view to the point where we have abandoned the beauties of the East? Is our "Big-Mac" culture what annoys the Eastern nations? Was Ancient Greece already moving toward the "cold" democracy that we know today where it had already lost touch with its ancestors, i.e. the millennia-old civilizations of the East?

Please read Mal's link in detail and share your thoughts, if you will. I don't know about the rest of you folks but I see a connection between this concept and home and garden.

Robby

kiwi lady
May 1, 2003 - 08:36 am
I don't think in NZ we have a big Mac culture. The city I live in is very Green and there are many gardens and Parks. Out here in my city one of the four which make up the Auckland region we have an eco city. The council has planted huge amounts of trees and we have lovely walkways etc. Gardening here is one of our most popular hobbies.

However the multi storey developments are creeping out from the city centre here and these are a blot on the landscape. There is much opposition amongst residents of Edwardian suburbs where developers are building multi level apartment blocks. Apartment living has been alien to our culture for so long. Most kiwis must have a garden so I guess maybe I should revise my opinion and say that the Big Mac culture is in some ways being forced upon us.

Carolyn

georgehd
May 1, 2003 - 09:06 am
Robby your post 440 is right on target. But I think that the problem, if I may call it that, is not with Western Culture, but with American (US) culture. Carolyn points out that in NZ there are gardens and they are loved; I suspect that this stems from their relationship with England and the English love of gardens and green spaces. Here in Cayman, gardens and the raising of flowers and orchids is important. Unfortunately, our shortage of water makes this an expensive hobby - yet many people do it.

I am familiar with magnificent gardens in England, France and Italy. At the same time, I also know that a wonderful large hot house in Baltimore's largest public park, has been abandoned. What school programs are usually sacrificed first in the US? The Arts! Beauty and open space are not prime considerations in a developers mind. Only in recent years, have city planners begun to realize the importance of open space and 'people friendly' buildings.

While I do not agree with terrorist Muslims, I can see how they want to reject submission to a US way of life. My point is not to get into a discussion of terrorism or Islam, but simply to point out that other cultures have values that differ from ours and these values need to be respected. Japan had its own culture prior to the end of World War 2; to some extent that culture has been sacrificed through their adoption of US culture. I see this as a negative. I see the opening of Big Mac's Disney Land, burger King,etc. in Europe as a negative imposition of US culture on Europeans.

So, Robby, I believe that Eastern culture certainly had a positive influence upon the West, but I am not sure that I see a right brain/left brain conflict. I hope that this post is clear as I may have tried to get too many thoughts in at one time.

Malryn (Mal)
May 1, 2003 - 10:55 am

There's a lot more to America than Big Mac commercial culture that isn't shown in movies or on TV. I've seen beautiful gardens everywhere I've lived, and I've lived a lot of places in this country.

One of the prettiest I've seen is on a little plot of land smack in the middle of New York City, not to mention the roof gardens and parks there.

There is scarcely a house around in the suburbs that doesn't have a garden, if only a few pots of geraniums sitting on the front steps, or hanging plants inside apartment building windows. Some of the gardens have statuary in them, little concrete gnomes or rabbits. Sometimes there are larger statues with fountains. I've seen vegetable gardens in people's front yards.

There is a big farmer's market at 9th Avenue and W. 57th in Manhattan where people flock to buy vegetables, flowers, small trees, herbs and seedlings to plant. Having watched films about such markets, I'd say there are many in cities throughout the U.S.

Art? Take a look at some of the murals painted on city buildings' outside walls.

Because we are so very multi-cultural, I think it's hard to say that we are more left-brained than right-brained here. In many ways I'd say emotionalism rules the world, expecially when it comes to religion and war.

I don't think democracy is cold. There have been many times when I've wished more reason and intellect were used than emotion when it comes to making democratic decisions.

The biggest problem I see with our relating to other nations is that we are very convinced our way of living is right, therefore better, and don't stop to consider that the other guys think their way is right and better, too. Two rights can't make a wrong. Or can they?

Mal

robert b. iadeluca
May 1, 2003 - 05:51 pm
"The kitchen is equipped with a great vzriety of iron, bronze, and earthenware vessels. Glass is a rare luxury, not made in Greece. Cooking is done over an open fire. Stoves are a Hellenistic innovation. Athenian meals are simple, like the Spartan and unlike the Boeotian, Corinthian, or Sicilian. When honored guests are expected it is customary to engage a professional cook, who is always male.

"Cooking is a highly developed art, with many texts and heroes. Some Greek cooks are as widely known as the latest victor in the Olympic games. To eat alone is considered barbarous, and table manners are looked upon as an index of a civilization's development. Women and boys eat at meals before small tables. Men recline on couches, two on each.

"The family eats together when alone. If male guests come, the women of the family retire to the gynaeceum. Attendants remove the sandals or wash the feet of the guests before the latter recline, and offer them water to cleanse their hands. Sometimes they anoint the heads of the guests with fragrant oils.

"There are no knives or forks, but there are spoons. Solid food is eaten with the fingers. During the meal the fingers are cleaned with scraps or crumbs of bread. After it with water. Before dessert the attendants fill the cup of each guest from a krater, or mixing bowl, in which wine has been diluted with water.

"Plates are of earthenware. Silver plate appears as the fifth century ends. Epicures grow in number in the fourth century. One Pithyllus has coverings made for his tongue and fingers so tht he may eat food as hot as he likes. There are a few vegetarians, whose guests make the usual jokes and complaints. One diner flees from a vegetarian feast for fear that he will be offered hay for dessert."

Any epicureans or gourmets here?

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
May 1, 2003 - 06:05 pm

Krater

Malryn (Mal)
May 1, 2003 - 06:12 pm

Ancient Greek and Roman Recipes

robert b. iadeluca
May 1, 2003 - 06:29 pm
"The kitchen is equipped with a great vzriety of iron, bronze, and earthenware vessels. Glass is a rare luxury, not made in Greece. Cooking is done over an open fire. Stoves are a Hellenistic innovation. Athenian meals are simple, like the Spartan and unlike the Boeotian, Corinthian, or Sicilian. When honored guests are expected it is customary to engage a professional cook, who is always male.

"Cooking is a highly developed art, with many texts and heroes. Some Greek cooks are as widely known as the latest victor in the Olympic games. To eat alone is considered barbarous, and table manners are looked upon as an index of a civilization's development. Women and boys eat at meals before small tables. Men recline on couches, two on each.

"The family eats together when alone. If male guests come, the women of the family retire to the gynaeceum. Attendants remove the sandals or wash the feet of the guests before the latter recline, and offer them water to cleanse their hands. Sometimes they anoint the heads of the guests with fragrant oils.

"There are no knives or forks, but there are spoons. Solid food is eaten with the fingers. During the meal the fingers are cleaned with scraps or crumbs of bread. After it with water. Before dessert the attendants fill the cup of each guest from a krater, or mixing bowl, in which wine has been diluted with water.

"Plates are of earthenware. Silver plate appears as the fifth century ends. Epicures grow in number in the fourth century. One Pithyllus has coverings made for his tongue and fingers so tht he may eat food as hot as he likes. There are a few vegetarians, whose guests make the usual jokes and complaints. One diner flees from a vegetarian feast for fear that he will be offered hay for dessert."

Any epicureans or gourmets here?

Robby

gaj
May 1, 2003 - 08:03 pm
I'm wondering if the Greeks started the idea that a man is a cheif and a woman a cook.

Malryn (Mal)
May 1, 2003 - 09:46 pm

I'm not sure the Ancient Greeks had anything to do with this. A chef is the boss, usually in a professional kitchen.

Chefs can be either female or male. To be an executive chef today in a restaurant kitchen, much training is required, either at a vocational school that teaches culinary arts or at a school like the Culinary Arts Institute in upstate New York. It takes 8 to 15 years as a cook and as apprentice to a chef to become an executive chef. Sous chefs work under the executive chef.

One of the best known female chefs in the United States is Alice Waters, who owns the restaurant, Chez Panisse, in California. And don't forget Chef Julia Child, who is still going strong at age 87. A late starter, she had her training at Le Cordon Bleu in France before she ever became a chef.

Mal

Bubble
May 2, 2003 - 02:02 am
Even I, have heard of Chez Panisse.



It seems that the people around the Mediterranean all enjoy eating with their fingers and prepare food that can be thus eaten. Couscous, crammed pita, falafel, pizza, shishliks on skewer where you eat directly from the skewer. Tender-moist grilled lamb ribs can never be so much savored when using fork and knife!



Of course hospitality means sharing your table too. Any visitor still there around meal time MUST stay and partake with the people of the house. It would be impolite not to do so.

robert b. iadeluca
May 2, 2003 - 03:08 am
"After the deipnon, or dinner, comes the sympotion, or drinking together. At Sparta as well as at Athens there are drinking clubs whose members become so attached to one another that such organizations become potent political instruments.

"The procedure at banquets is complicated, and philosophers like Xenocrates and Aristotle think it desirable to set down laws for them. The floor, upon which uneaten material has been thrown, is swept clean after the meal. Perfumes are passed around, and much wine. The guests may then dance, not in pairs or with the other sex (for actually only males are invited) but in groups. They may play games like kottabosy or they may match poems, witticisms, or riddles, or watch professional performers like the female acrobat in Xenophon's Sympotium, who tosses twelve hoops at once and then dances somersaults through a hoop 'set all around with upright swords.' Flute girls may appear, play, sing, dance, and love as arranged for.

"Educated Athenians prefer, now and then, a sympotium of conversation , conducted in an orderly manner by a sympotiarch chosen by a throw of the dice to act as chairman. The guests take care not to break up the talk into small groups, which usually means small talk. They keep the conversation general, and listen, as courteously as their vivacity will permit, to each man in turn. So elegant a discourse as that which Plato offers us is doubtless the product of his brilliant imagination. Probably Athens has known dialogues as lively as his, perhaps profounder. In any case it is Athenian society that suggests and provides the background.

"In that exciting atmosphere of free wits the Athenian mind is formed."

What are your thoughts in this, our own sympotium of conversation? Is our discourse elegant? Do we listen (as courteously as our vivacity will permit) to each person in turn? We have, at times, matched poems and witticisms. Can we say we have an exciting atmosphere of free wits?

Flute girls? Well, who knows what the future holds?

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
May 2, 2003 - 03:22 am
Click HERE to learn about modern Eating Clubs.

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
May 2, 2003 - 05:04 am
KOTTABOS GAME

Malryn (Mal)
May 2, 2003 - 05:11 am
"Billing itself as seeking to extend the horizons of sophant pleasure. The society has become mainly a meeting place for the sensually adventurous. The orgies are notorious, as are the banquets. Membership is open to all, but expensive. Frequently the subject of religious picketing. Motto- everything to excess. All services within the club are free, including rooms held by the club at the Ambassador. $100,000 cr to join, $10,000 cr/year dues."

More HERE

Malryn (Mal)
May 2, 2003 - 05:21 am

SYMPOSIUM BY PLATO

georgehd
May 2, 2003 - 05:38 am
I had not read the last post when I wrote this.

Robby, IMO the conversation here is elegant and informative and we must listen because in fact we are reading and have to wait to see the entire posting. Real face to face conversation is often not so interesting and I am sure that all of us have experienced the feeling of being "out of a conversation" that is taking place around us. I think that the hardest thing for a person to do is to listen, really listen, to what others are saying. I know that I often will be composing my thoughts and trying to come up with a point while others may still be speaking. You want to keep the conversation going and take part and I feel that there is a natural tendency to believe that what "I" have to say is extremely important. Real life conversations usually involve people of different backgrounds and abilities and this can lead to the domination of a conversation by a few people.

I think that the idea of breaking up into small groups is an interesting one and it is a technique used often in large groups.

The eating clubs of Princeton do not seem to be analagous with the Greek sympotion. I get the impression that men of all ages were involved in the Greek dinners and after dinner discourse. My experience (a long time ago) with the fraternity system at college leads me to suspect that the conversation at the eating clubs of Princeton or any college is far more basic and the topics of conversation not very challenging. Drinking alcohol was not usually done at regular meals. And the meals themselves were not very elegant. I also note that the Greeks seemed to keep the girls out, which Princeton used to do but this practice has changed.

In many large cities, there are Food or Wine and Food Societies that do get people together to enjoy each others company as well as good food and wine. In Cayman, there are two or three such groups. I am currently in correspondence with a California vintner whom we hope will visit next spring and talk about the making of wine (sampling is an important part of our education). A few weeks ago we hosted one of the world's authorities on French wines. But I want to emphasise that the focus is on wine and food and NOT on conversation.

The discription of the Greek sympotion seems very different from what I describe here. Note in Greece "such organizations become important political instruments". I sense that in our society we have separated the "fun" part of eating and drinking from the more serious questions of the day. There are business men's groups that do meet regularly to eat and drink and also to discuss issues. I am thinking of the Rotarians, Elks, Moose, Masons, etc. Having never been a member of any of these groups, I can say nothing about them.

As for "Flute Girls" - we are always looking for interesting diversions down here, so any contact information someone may have, please pass it on.

Bubble
May 2, 2003 - 05:48 am
The French, who pride themselves as the best cooks and connaisseurs in matters of haute cuisine, have always maintained that you should never talk of serious business during a meal since it detracts from the proper attention you should devote to tasting and enjoying. The exchange of high ideas and good arguments should be left for the after dinner with the "pousse-cafe" and smoke.

robert b. iadeluca
May 2, 2003 - 06:06 am
How about this concept on a lower level, e.g. serious conversation around the daily family dinner table?

Robby

depfran
May 2, 2003 - 08:05 am
Agathon gives praise to the God-Love..`'Gives peace on earth and calms the stormy deep, Who still the winds and bids the sufferer sleep.' How gratefull I am to Plato for bearing witness of discourses of philosophers sitting with Socrates at a simple diner reunion. They were amongst the highest thinkers of all times.

Don't we have more fun discussing the topic of love then the more serious subject of finance and politics? Françoise

kiwi lady
May 2, 2003 - 12:15 pm
One of the suggestions made by experts is that the family try to eat the evening meal together each day and to talk during that meal. In the society we live in the evening meal may be the only time when family will get a chance to talk. I don't think the talk should be confined to small talk. Brooke often comes out with little worries during the meal time about school etc. (Brooke is my 5yr old grandaughter). Nikolas and I always sit up to the table for lunch when he is here. He talks to me a lot during the meal. I laughed the other day when his Mum put him in a chair and he was indignant. "No" he said " this is Grannys chair". We always sit at the same places at the table.

Small dinner parties are best for good conversation I think.

Carolyn

robert b. iadeluca
May 2, 2003 - 02:12 pm
The GREEN quotes move us onward:--

"Old age is feared and mourned but even here, it has its consolations. As the used-up body is returned like worn currency to the mint, it has the solace of seeing, before it is consumed, the fresh new life through which it cheats mortality.

"It is true that Greek history reveals cases of selfish carelessness or coarse insolence towards the old. Athenian society, commercial, individualistic, and innovating, tends to be unkind to old age. Respect for years goes with a religious and conservative society like Sparta's, while democracy, loosening all bonds with freedom, puts the accent on youth, and favors the new against the old."

It would appear from this passage that the Western culture's poor treatment of the elderly as compared to the respect shown by Eastern culture is a by-product of democracy. Commerce, individualism, and innovation are apparently the companions of youth -- whether the youth of the individual or the youth of the nation.

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
May 2, 2003 - 02:49 pm
The New York Times today has an article about a show at the Metropolitan Museum which features "Divine Dresses" inspired by Ancient Greek fashions. Be sure to click the Multimedia interactive audio-visual feature at the right of the page for the commentary.

Divine Dresses from Olympus

kiwi lady
May 2, 2003 - 03:36 pm
It is not only the West who are in some ways "selfish" with their attitude to elderly relatives its now the East as they embrace the ideology of Consumerism for instance Japan is an example. Japanese youth in the main do not hold their elders in as much respect as they once did. I don't believe democracy has as much to do with this change as consumerism and with this comes the desire to earn more money to pay for the desirable goods etc. Families are smaller and women are staying single longer to take advantage of their new independance. This independance has been gained by exposure to Western Society via TV and Tourism.

Carolyn

Malryn (Mal)
May 2, 2003 - 04:06 pm

I think to myself sometimes that there's a lie in every generality. Not all young people today are too busy and wrapped up in themselves and their lives that they ignore the needs of their aging parents.

I live in a small apartment which adjoins my daughter's house. It was built according to plans my daughter and I drew with special attention paid to the fact that I am a handicapped person. I am more disabled now than I was when this addition was built, and we see a few things that need to be changed, but where else would you find an apartment which has a pocket door for the bathroom which leaves room for a wheelchair to go through? Where else would you find a deck and boardwalk that go directly from the sliding glass doors in the living area to my car, and a doorway from the living area to the kitchen which is wide enough for this chair to push through?

My daughter helps me a great deal. I won't list the ways. One of my sons just bought me this wheelchair in which I sit, and though he's more than 500 miles away, he has helped me a lot, too.

I know of other situations like this. One of my best friends here lives in a lovely home her two daughters and their husbands had built for her. My friend is a potter and ceramic artist, and there is a large room for her potter's wheel, a small kiln and other equipment she has. Her daughter in a nearby city is there in an instant if 82 year old Edna needs her, and her daughter in Massachusetts has been known to drop everything and fly here if there's a need.

I might add that my 27 year old granddaughter took me out every week with her for Cappuccino and a lot of laughs. She ran errands for me, helped me get to the doctor, and more. There's a gap in my life since she moved away.

These are only a few examples of caring younger people I know who don't throw their parents and grandparents in the dustbin when they get old.

Mal

georgehd
May 2, 2003 - 04:15 pm
In the US, we seem to warehouse the elderly and depending on the how much the family can afford, the quality of care is quite variable. Years ago I was most impressed with the few old age "homes" I visited in Israel. Young people were much in evidence interacting with the old and all kinds of activities were offered with a stress on movement. I do not know if this same situation is true today.

What is meant by the soul dwelling as an insubstantial shade in Hades? We are dealing with this kind of issue in the Inferno discussion. Did the Greek soul ever get out of Hades?

kiwi lady
May 2, 2003 - 04:26 pm
Mal as I look about me- children like yours and mine are few and far between.

Carolyn

kiwi lady
May 2, 2003 - 04:30 pm
I visit an elder retirement home. The old people rarely see their grandchildren they have told me so. I rarely see young people visiting there. My daughter Nicky and her SIL are the youngest people I have seen there- most visitors are my age. My grandchildren are just made such a fuss of and the old people keep chocolate bars etc especially for them that they buy at the retirement home shop. The residents just adore having little ones visit - they seem to take on new energy as they interact with the little ones.

Carolyn

robert b. iadeluca
May 2, 2003 - 05:36 pm
"Athenian history offers several instances of children taking over their parents' property without proof of imbecility in the elders. Athenian law commands that sons shall support their infirm or aged parents. Public opinion, which is always more fearful than the law, enjoins modesty and respect in the behavior of the young towards the old. Plato takes it for granted that a well-bred youth will be silent in the presence of his seniors unless he is asked to speak.

"There are in the literature many pictures of modest adolescence, as in the earlier dialogues of Plato, or the Symposium of Xenophon, and there are touching stories of filial devotion, like that of Orestes to Agamemnon, and of Antigone to Oedipus."

Robby

Bubble
May 3, 2003 - 03:18 am
George, retirement homes in Israel are getting better, it is true. In the 60s it was apalling. The ones provided by social services and governemnt help have still much to improve, but there are more and more private ones opened which though expensive can compare with the best hotels. The staff is usually very helpful. It is very individual of course, but the near family usually visit often, at least once a week and if each of the children has his day it could would two to five more visits weekly.



I see that indifference to elderly as a byproduct of civilisation. I never saw it with the "primitive" natives.

robert b. iadeluca
May 3, 2003 - 03:51 am
This LINK tells us how various nations handle responsibility to the elderly.

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
May 3, 2003 - 04:00 am
As a doctor I always tell my patients when I start working with them that everything said to me is confidential. However, I also point out that there are a few exceptions, one of which is evidence of ELDER ABUSE and that I am required by law to report this. This link leads to an excellent article on this subject.

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
May 3, 2003 - 04:58 am

Elder Abuse, Victimization, U.S.

Abuse statistics, Australia

Malryn (Mal)
May 3, 2003 - 06:18 am

Ghosts in Antiquity

Ancient Athens: Marriage and Funeral Rites

kiwi lady
May 3, 2003 - 06:37 am
Elder abuse - Yes a terrible thing. We have not seen actual abuse but have heard of children stripping bank accounts when they have power of attorney and not providing adequate food or heating for elders under their care. I saw elder abuse in a facility. Incontinent patients were kept in a bedroom which had a linoleum floor - no heating and the beds were not changed as they should have been. The incontinent patients lounge was also cold and unheated. Most of the patients were confused and suffering early dementia. The manager was sacked and the facility sold - new owners upgraded and improved the facility. However I must say that facilities are improving now with very good amenities, entertainment and caring staff. Frail elders are every bit as vulnerable as children and we should be protecting them as a society.

Carolyn

robert b. iadeluca
May 3, 2003 - 07:57 am
"When death comes, the body must be buried or burned, else the soul will wander restlessly about the world, and will revenge itself upon its negligent posterity. It may, for example, reappear as a ghost, and bring disease or disaster to plants and men.

"Cremation is more popular in the Heroic Age, burial in the classic. Burial was Mycenaean, and will survive into Christianity. Cremation apparently entered Greece wiwh the Achaeans and the Dorians, whose nomad habits made impossible the proper care of graves.

"One or the other is so obligatory among Athenians that the victorious generals at Arginusae are put to death for allowing a severe storm to deter them from recovering and burying their dead."

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
May 3, 2003 - 08:00 am
Death is a very personal thing and to some people, a fearful thing. Nevertheless, there may be some participants here who are willing to share their views. As for myself, it is my intention to be cremated.

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
May 3, 2003 - 08:27 am
When Death Comes

Mary Oliver



When death comes
like the hungry bear in autumn;
when death comes and takes all the bright coins from his purse
to buy me, and snaps the purse shut;
when death comes
like the measles-pox;



when death comes
like an iceberg between the shoulder blades,



I want to step through the door full of curiosity, wondering:
what is it going to be like, that cottage of darkness?



And therefore I look upon everything
as a brotherhood and a sisterhood,
and I look upon time as no more than an idea,
and I consider eternity as another possibility,



and I think of each life as a flower, as common
as a field daisy, and as singular,



and each name a comfortable music in the mouth
tending as all music does, toward silence,



and each body a lion of courage, and something
precious to the earth.



When it's over, I want to say: all my life
I was a bride married to amazement.
I was the bridegroom, taking the world into my arms.



When it is over, I don't want to wonder
if I have made of my life something particular, and real.
I don't want to find myself sighing and frightened,
or full of argument.



I don't want to end up simply having visited this world.

Malryn (Mal)
May 3, 2003 - 08:37 am

That's my intention, too, Robby.

My children all know what I want for a funeral. I want them to go to Nubble Lighthouse at York, Maine -- a place I love -- and have a lobster feast on the rocks there with a Dixieland Band playing all the tunes I play on the piano that we've sung so many times. I want them to have the same kind of happy time we have when we're together and act just as if I were there enjoying myself. They know darned well that if they don't do this, I'll haunt them on their birthdays and Hallowe'en.

I remember once when a very dear friend of mine died. Two other friends of his and I went to one of his favorite restaurants and laughed as we remembered some of the wonderfully eccentric things he did and how special he was. It was one of the most wonderful memorials I've ever seen, and that's how I want mine to be.

Mal

Malryn (Mal)
May 3, 2003 - 09:00 am

Nubble Lighthouse York, Maine

Bubble
May 3, 2003 - 09:40 am
I am afraid there is not much choice for me in this country: there is only the religious burial possible and nothing else.



Cremation would be the ideal. After all, death IMO is only the passing through, without any danger, to another ... unknown yet parallel world and the enveloppe left behind matters not. Bubble

Malryn (Mal)
May 3, 2003 - 09:50 am

And to me death is the final number I'll sing and play with no encore I need to rehearse, the last chapter I'll write. Every day of my life is and has been a surprise and a wonder, even if all I do is sit in front of a computer building more web pages or writing another book.

Mal

robert b. iadeluca
May 3, 2003 - 09:50 am
Bubble:--I was not aware that only religious burial is permitted in Israel. Although I do not pretend to be knowledgeable in this area, I had thought that there were varying procedures permitted depending on whether one was Orthodox or not.

Robby

HubertPaul
May 3, 2003 - 09:50 am
ONE WORLD AT A TIME

THOREAU, when asked about the hereafter

 
	Finally out of reach– 
	No bondage, no dependency. 
	How calm the ocean, 
	Towering the void. 
		tessho 

robert b. iadeluca
May 3, 2003 - 09:52 am
Hubert:--I had not read that before. Thank you for sharing it.

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
May 3, 2003 - 10:12 am
To me it's the work I put into something that counts, not the end of the project.
To me it's the journey that's important, not the destination.

robert b. iadeluca
May 3, 2003 - 10:32 am
"The corpse is bathed, anointed with perfumes, crowned with flowers, and dressed in the finest garments that the family can afford. An obol is placed between the teeth to pay Charon, the mythical boatman who ferries the dead across the Styx to Hades. The body is placed in a coffin of pottery or wood. 'To have one foot in the coffin' is already a proverb in Greece.

"Mourning is elaborate. Black garments are worn, and the hair, or part of it, is shorn as a gift for the dead. On the third day the corpse is carried on a bier in procession through the streets, while the women weep and beat their breasts. Professional wailers or dirge singers may be hired for the occasion.

"Upon the sod of the covered grave wine is poured to slake the dead soul's thirst, and animals may be sacrificed for its food. The mourners lay wreaths of flowers or cypress upon the tomb, and then return home to the funeral feast. Since the departed soul is believed to be present at this feast, sacred custom requires that 'of the dead nothing but good' shall be spoken. This is the source of an ancient saw, and perhaps of the unfailing lauds of our epitaphs.

"Periodically the children visit the graves of their ancestors, and offer them food and drink. After the battle of Plataea, where the Greeks of many cities have fallen, the Plataeans pledge themselves to provide for all the dead an annual repast. Six centuries later, in the days of Plutarch, this promise will still be performed."

Robby

kiwi lady
May 3, 2003 - 12:51 pm
Many Pakeha (white) New Zealanders have followed our Maori tradition and now bring the bodies home to lie in state. During this time friends and family come to visit. The body lies in the living area normally and people eat and laugh in the same area. People talk about the deceased, cry - talk to the deceased if they wish - even scold the deceased for some wrong. I think its a healthy way of saying goodbye. We still have not gained the freedom the Maori have in expressing their grief but we certainly have gone a long way towards much more healthy grieving. I have attended Maori tangis also.

Carolyn

robert b. iadeluca
May 3, 2003 - 01:18 pm
Here is some information about MAORI FUNERALS.

Robby

kiwi lady
May 3, 2003 - 01:31 pm
Interesting piece Robbie but I have one thing to say. I think both cultures have taken something from each other its not all one way.

Many things Maori have also been embraced by the Pakeha such as mourning customs, the Haka which is performed at all our major sports matches by both Maori and Pakeha. It would be unthinkable for the haka not to be performed at these events. We now sing our national anthem in both languages and our unofficial National Anthem sung by homesick kiwis all over the world when they gather together is Po kare kare ana.

Carolyn

robert b. iadeluca
May 3, 2003 - 03:06 pm
"In Homer only spirits guilty of exceptional or sacrilegious offense suffer punishment there. All the rest, saints and sinners alike, share an equal fare of endless prowling about dark Pluto's realm.

"In the course of Greek history a belief arises, among the poorer classes, in Hades as a place of expiation for sins. Aeschylus pictures Zeus as judging the dead there and punishing the guilty, though no word is said about rewarding the good. Only rarely do we find mention of the Blessed Isles, or the Elysian Fields, as heavens of eternal happiness for a few heroic souls.

The thought of the gloomy fate awaiting nearly all the dead darkens Greek literature, and makes Greek life less bright and cheerful than is fitting under such a sun."

Robby

Justin
May 3, 2003 - 05:08 pm
Death, like birth happens only once to every person. There are folks who die many times before the end but in reality it comes only once. There is nothing we can do about birth. It just happens to us and so it is with death. When it happens, there is no more. Life is over.

Is there a hereafter? Not at all. That is wishful thinking. It is an expression of great conceit , an excess of the ego, that causes us to think we think we are so worthwhile that we will be allowed to continue living in some form, somewhere.

When death comes, we are gone to living. Our bodies moulder and disintegrate and that's it. The only question for the living concerns disposal of the body-fast or slow. One doesn't want the thing lying about unpleasantly troubling our senses. Things should be neat. The stink of human death is putrid. Most folks never smell it because undertakers do a good job of cleaning things up for us.

During the war, I had the unpleasant task of taking a series of small islands called atolls that lay between Australia and Japan. A small atoll with 6000 to 7000 dead lying in the hot sun for a few days can be a challenge to the living. When the battle was over and an atoll was secured, bulldozers were used to put the dead under sand as quickly as possible. But the process was never quick enough.

It is no wonder the Greek generals were put to death for failing to recover the dead. I wonder what the opposing armies did on the Somme and at the Marne, and in the Salient during WW1. Trenches lay on opposite sides and men manned those trenches. Body recovery wasn't feasible and thousands died in those attacks.

kiwi lady
May 3, 2003 - 05:15 pm
Justin - that is your opinion some of us have another opinion.

carolyn

robert b. iadeluca
May 3, 2003 - 05:15 pm
Justin has not tried to have other participants here follow his belief so he is not prosylitizing.

As I said in an earlier posting, death is a very personal thing.

Robby

kiwi lady
May 3, 2003 - 05:50 pm
It would have been better if Justin had started his statement with "I believe". As it is, it's a categorical statement.

Carolyn

Bubble
May 4, 2003 - 12:49 am
Unfortunately, such is the rule in Israel and we all have to go through the rituals, even if we do not believe in them. The same exists for other rites.
A friend of my son has left this week for Cyprus with his wife-to-be, to get married in a civil ceremony. It does not officially exist here yet.



As for burial, the religious sector are the deciding factor and I remember the uproar 2 or 3 years ago when they refused to bury a new immigrant soldier killed in action because one of his parents was supposedly not jewish, not converted through the proper recognized channels.
For us non fanatics, it was unthinkable to have him buried outside the walls of a cemetary. I think a resting place was found in one of the secular kibbutzim.



Yes Justin, life as we know it here is over IMO too .
I still think the soul endures somehow probably as a different energy. Is that ego you think? I doubt it is.
For me it is just another circle of growth in Nature, not good or bad and with different stages, that would go on and on. We are not privy to what lays (lies?) in the future. Bubble

robert b. iadeluca
May 4, 2003 - 04:14 am
Durant now brings us (see GREEN quotes) to a topic which I know is a favorite of many participants and lurkers here --

The Art of Periclean Greece

"'It is beautiful,' says a character in Xenophon's Economias, 'to see the footgear ranged in a row according to its kind, -- beautiful to see garments sorted according to their use and coverlets -- beautiful to see glass vases and tableware so sorted -- and beautiful, too, despite the jeers of the witless and flippant, to see cooking-pots arranged with sense and symmetry.

"'Yes, all things without exception, becaue of symmetry, will appear more beautiful when placed in order. All these utensils will then seem to form a choir. The center which they unite to form will create a beauty that will be enhanced by the distance of the other objects in the group.'

"This passage from a general reveals the scope, simplicity, and strength of the esthetic sense in Greece."

I understand this concept from an intellectual point of view but I am afraid that there are very few "choirs" in my bachelor home. The items in my home are placed from a functional point of view.

How does your home look? Tell us your artistic approach and how it affects your home and your living.

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
May 4, 2003 - 05:06 am
Here is an absolutely fascinating link about SYMMETRY. You could spend hours here! But please come back to us with your own ideas hopefully relating them to Ancient Greece.

Did you know there is a photographer who specializes in taking pictures of snowflakes?

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
May 4, 2003 - 05:42 am
The Aching Barometer Bones Society ( ABBS ), a group of WREX writers, had a Cyberspace party here at the Bohemian Club Friday night and all day Saturday until midnight. There was virtual dancing, singing, lots of food and drink and plenty of music and fun. If I can get my head together after all those happy festivities, I'll describe some of what I call the still-lifes in my apartment.

It's one big room with lots of glass and light. The kitchen area is long and narrow -- 7 feet wide by 22 feet long. There are bookcases on either side of the glass French door that leads to the deck. That's where I keep my collection of about 300 cookbooks. Beyond them on one side are multi-paned French doors which lead to my daughter's studio. Opposite that is a pale yellow hutch and cabinet. On its shelves are part of my pottery collection, wonderful pots made by friends of mine. Next to it is an oil painting I did of my mother. The red in the painting matches the red paint on the kitchen floor.

Next to the stove on a counter are three square pottery plates with designs on them a ceramic artist I know made for me. On top of the two cupboards are two old New England brown and white bean pots and a colorful Italian soup tureen whose cover is shaped like vegetables.

The woodwork in that room is Cadet blue and the walls are a pale, pale green. Hanging on a Cadet blue wooden cover that conceals the vent over the stove is an old schoolhouse clock. On the little shelves on either side are another small brown and white bean pot and an old, dented copper tea kettle with a fine patina. There are small colorful ceramic objects on the shelf underneath.

There's a pass-through near the doorway between the kitchen and the living area which has a small counter with an arch over it. On the counter are a red, white and green Chinese lamp with black base next to two cobalt blue bottles and an old small wine bottle covered with basketry. Beyond that is my cluttered computer table, the top of which is only artistic to me.

The living area of this room is 15 feet wide and almost 30 feet long. As I sit here I look at sliding glass doors to the deck. Beyond the computer table are an etagere with flowering plants on it near the door. It is next to a bookcase, and I look out at a display of flowering quince and other potted plants on the deck, the holly tree which grows up through a hole made for it in the deck, and woods past that.

On the wall above the small TV, which is on a kitty-cornered art deco oak chest between the doors and the windows, is a watercolor painting done in rusts and red I did of my mentor and dear friend which shows him striding in front of shops down a brick sidewalk on State Street in Newburyport, Massachusetts. Sitting next to the TV is a large philodendron plant in a yellow pot.

Between the two double windows on that side of the room there hang an old barometer, a ceramic sun made by a ceramic artist I know and a small basket made in the low country in South Carolina.

On one end of the box shaped closet which does not reach the high, peaked ceiling and divides the living and sleeping areas, there is a small cabinet with a glass door which contains small ceramic pieces. There is a plain Shaker type cabinet underneath that. On top of it are two crystal candlesticks my New York son gave to me and a very plain crystal vase a writer sent to me for my birthday a year ago. My desk is opposite the end of the closet. Above it is a modern curved-top mirror with wooden frame that was made by a craftsman I know.

Beyond the closet box is my bed, opposite which is a collection of baskets on a small loft. There are three bookcases full of books in that part of the room.

There are other paintings around which were either painted by me or by friends I have. Among them there are two portraits of me done by an artist I knew when I lived in Florida. One with me in a plain blue shirt with windblown hair. In the other I am wearing a rust colored blouse; my hair is shorter. I was 59 when these were done, look full of life, and don't look that age.

I forgot to mention the two antique clocks and an antique landscape painting which are on a bookcase right in front of me as I sit here at the computer

There's nothing formal about where I live, but it's warm and friendly with the yellow walls and blue trim in the living and sleeping area and a honey colored floor. Because I am who I am this big room looks like an artist's studio, and there's art all around me.

Mal

Éloïse De Pelteau
May 4, 2003 - 06:01 am
After having examined this subject all my life, I am more and more convinced that nothing in the universe completely dies, plant, animal, mineral, the cosmos, but everything is in flux. Of all the living things on earth, only humans have a soul/spirit and even if eventually the body becomes food for plants, the spirit lives forever.

When plants or animals die, the body disintegrates and is transformed into other organisms to be reused by nature to nourish the soil and for other purposes. Measured in time, this transformation takes only a microsecond if we believe that the cosmos has always existed. The human body and its spirit are two different things, one is temporary, the other permanent in my opinion. In the physical sense, we can accept that after a person dies, their progeny permits a continuation of the cycle of life.

Human beings have not yet, with their super intelligence (not spirit) developed means to live completely at peace with one another, seem to enjoy fighting and try to find a reason for it. This has an ultimate purpose.

Science has appeared only in the recent millinneum and we are in awe of their accomplishments, but scientists need to study a few million years more before they can prove without a doubt that there is life after the body dies. For that they need to work within the intelligence they were born with that is transformed through the ages ever so slowly, or they can accept that there is a supreme being above orchestrating this magnificent life we are fortunate to be part of.

Some believe in science, others believe in God we have a choice.

Eloise

Malryn (Mal)
May 4, 2003 - 06:10 am

There were scientific discoveries more than 2500 years ago. I believe in a higher power within me, and I believe in science, too, as do many other people I know. For me, immortality is in my children and grandchildren and the art I've done all my life, which will remain with them.

I thought we had gone beyond this topic. My still-life description now seems out of place.

Mal

robert b. iadeluca
May 4, 2003 - 06:15 am
To sleep, perchance to dream; aye, there's the' rub,
For in that sleep of death, what dreams may come,
When we have shuffl'd off this mortal coil,
Must give us pause. To die, to sleep, to dream
No more; and by a sleep, to say we end
The heart-ache, and the thousand natural shocks
That flesh is heir to, is a consumation
Devoutly to be wish'd. For in our graves,
After life's fitful fever, one sleeps well.

- - - Shakespeare in Hamlet

Malryn (Mal)
May 4, 2003 - 06:28 am

Hamlet is contemplating suicide when he does that soliloquy. I'm going back to my artwork and think about LIFE!

Mal

Éloïse De Pelteau
May 4, 2003 - 06:36 am
Mal, your still life description is never out of place. It is beautifully expressed. My own dwelling pales in comparison.

Malryn (Mal)
May 4, 2003 - 06:44 am

Eloise, I'm sure your home is beautiful and full of things you love. I'm more than sure it's neater than mine.

Mal

robert b. iadeluca
May 4, 2003 - 06:58 am
Give up, you two. My home is a model of perfection!

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
May 4, 2003 - 07:04 am

So tell us what it looks like, Robby. You made me laugh out loud!

Mal

robert b. iadeluca
May 4, 2003 - 07:11 am
It is symmetrical. Each wall faces the other and the ceiling is opposite the floor.

For those who haven't yet read my link to Symmetry in a previous post, I heartily recommend it!

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
May 4, 2003 - 07:19 am

Did you look at the Symme Toy page? There's a program with all kinds of designs and patterns to make which would look great on my web pages. Wonder where I can get the money to buy it?

Any portrait artist will tell you that human faces are not really symmetrical. A French artist I knew once told me that the best way to get a likeness is to look for asymmetry and flaws in the face you're trying to draw or paint. I'm inclined to think that there are not too many things visually in real life which are really symmetrical.

I wonder if Feng Shui is based on some kind of symmetry?

Mal

Malryn (Mal)
May 4, 2003 - 07:30 am

I don't need that program after all. I just went to Google's image search and typed in Symmetry. Many, many, many images with pictures of symmetric design came up. Try it. It's fun!

But is it art?

Mal

Éloïse De Pelteau
May 4, 2003 - 07:37 am
If Picasso said that there is nothing symetrical in nature does it mean that beauty is not symetrical? If we really look at nature, it seems to me that he is right, then why are we always trying to look for symetry? Is balance and symetry equal or opposites? Justin could perhaps explain this more in depth.

georgehd
May 4, 2003 - 07:53 am
I logged on this morning to 20 new posts, far more than I can digest right now. If the group has not gone on to other topics I will try to post this afternoon. I have thoughts about much of the material discussed.

robert b. iadeluca
May 4, 2003 - 08:06 am
George:--In general, this is a fast moving discussion group. Most participants check in once or twice a day.

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
May 4, 2003 - 08:24 am
"The feeling for precision and clarity, for proportion and order enters into the shape and ornament of every bowl and vase -- of every statue and painting -- of every temple and tomb -- of every poem and drama -- of all Greek work in science and philosophy.

"Greek art is reason made manifest. Greek painting is the logic of line. Greek sculpture is a worship of symmetry. Greek architecture is a marble geometry.

"There is no extravagance of emotion in Periclean art -- no bizarrerie of form -- no striving for novelty through the abnormal or unusual. The purpose is not to represent the indiscriminate irrelevancy of the real, but to catch the illuminating essence of things, and to portray the ideal possibilities of men.

The pursuit of wealth, beauty, and knowledge so absorbed the Athenians that they had no time for goodness."

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
May 4, 2003 - 08:32 am
I just made the web page background linked below from an image of a plate I found by doing a Google search on Symmetry. The plate is the picture in the border on the left. It was much larger, and I cropped it and masked the background it had with color and reduced the size. The small image over the titles on the page is the round center of the plate, which I created by cropping the image and changing the background color. In order to change what was originally behind the plate, I had to enlarge the image. When I did, I found that what looks symmetrical really isn't. I might use this web page background for the index cover of the October issue of the WREX Magazine. I took the colors on the page from the colors on the plate.

SYMMETRY EXPERIMENT

georgehd
May 4, 2003 - 11:01 am
Robby, I am afraid that sometimes I think this discussion moves too fast but since I am the new kid on the block, I will try to stay current. However, I note that in the last 20 posts or so, we have discussed death, the hereafter, Greek art, symetry, the spirit and soul, and the art objects in and arrangements of our homes. A lot of ground to cover.

For the record, I do not believe in Hell, except the Hell that we create for ourselves. I am open minded about Heaven but tend to agree with Justin that when I die, that is it for me. That is why I believe that it is what we accomplish here on earth that is important; I will not be rewarded later on (or punished either). As for the spirit and the soul, I posted (in Abraham) what I considered a rather interesting description of the spirit and soul as seen by a Shaman whom I know. Shaman believe that everything has a spirit but for man the spirit is the soul.

As a former art dealer and collector of photographs, my home was and is filled with art. My wife is far more visual than I, so our home is carefully thought about visually. Color is important- and the absence of color. Functionality is considered primary where it really makes a difference (the kitchen and the office). The art of the Greeks is considered classic and still plays an important part in the curriculum of most art schools.

Eloise posted "Some believe in science , others believe in God - we have a choice." I beg to differ. One can believe in both as many scientists do.

Back to what happens after we die - there was a very interesting book written by a Yale trained psychologist (analyst?) in which he described patients who seemed to have had past lives. While I do not believe in reincarnation, I have left the door open.

And then there is symetry an important subject in both art and science. In Stephen Hawkings book, a Brief History Of Time, there are numerous references to symetry in the physical world. I also have a book Einstein and Picasso which shows how the ideas of both men were related.

I have just ordered a program on Fractals which deals with mathematically created symetrical objects in two or three dimensions. I got fascinated by the imagery that one gets in most music playing programs on the computer. These are all fractals I believe.

Malryn (Mal)
May 4, 2003 - 11:40 am

George mentioned Fractals. Click the link below to see a web page background done by a graphics artist using a computer. The fractal art is on the left border.

Example of Fractals

georgehd
May 4, 2003 - 12:06 pm
My google search found this unexpected site on symmetry in Oriental rug design.

http://mathforum.org/geometry/rugs/

georgehd
May 4, 2003 - 12:09 pm
A site on Greek art. Be sure to scroll up to top of page as I found article enlightening. A lot of good ideas here.

http://www.artchive.com/artchive/G/greek.html#sculpture

robert b. iadeluca
May 4, 2003 - 01:05 pm
Any reactions to this comment in Post 513?



"The pursuit of wealth, beauty, and knowledge so absorbed the Athenians that they had no time for goodness."

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
May 4, 2003 - 01:54 pm

I don't know what Durant means by that because I think pursuing wealth, beauty and knowledge are all part of goodness. A degree of wealth and comfort takes away the stresses that are deterrents when it comes to creating beauty and pursuing beauty and knowledge. Starving people can only think of food and survival.

As you soon will write, Robby, Durant goes on to say, ". . . he (the Greek) thought of art as subordinate to life, and of living as the greatest art of all; he had a healthy utilitarian bias against any beauty that could not be used; the useful, the beautiful, and the good were almost as closely bound together in his thought as in the Socratic phlosophy."

I agree. Art is most enjoyed when it can be used, even if its use is to enhance your surroundings and brighten your mood. Life should be the greatest art of all.

George, I'm glad you go to Mark Harden's Artchive. That and the Web Museum are two of the finest art sites on the web, in my opinion.

Mal

kiwi lady
May 4, 2003 - 03:10 pm
The phrase you asked us to comment on.

Mal I disagree with your comment. While it may apply to some we have to remember that some of the most cruel leaders of the German Nazi party were music and art lovers. I cannot see any goodness in Hitler and his close associates. Saddam Hussein enjoyed art and valued antiquities.

I have seen much change even in my short lifetime. When I was a kid ordinary people cared more about their neighbours than acquiring beautiful things now I see that having the most beautiful home, the best car, the highest salary are very important to people. This goes right through the whole of society whether it be the working class or the professional class. Many people never get to know their neighbours. I might not have been surrounded by beautiful things as a kid but I sure had a safe and supportive community to grow up in.

Carolyn People don't think too much these days about being "good".

Malryn (Mal)
May 4, 2003 - 03:49 pm

I spent most of my growing-up years in a modest house, which the aunt and uncle who raised me had built themselves, six miles from the center of a small city. Each had a high school education, and each went to work right out of school.

My aunt was a bookkeeper in a jewelry store downtown. My uncle was an electrician who serviced oil burners. When things were tight in the city where we lived, he took the train into Boston and worked there.

The money he earned went for household expenses, and what my aunt earned went for clothes for her and me and the decorating of the house. She bought beautiful things -- oriental rugs, Spode china, Royal Doulton figurines among other lovely things, plus many books. Sterling silver was the flatware on the dinner table, and she had bought and paid for every piece.

Somehow I received the impression that if one worked hard, he or she could have "extras" like that and perhaps a week's vacation at the beach or some lake, a concert or movie now and then, and help for me when I went away to get an education.

In other words, what my aunt and uncle did was better their lot, and my aunt made sure they were surrounded by what beauty she could afford to buy and what she could create in her garden outside. That's what I was talking about.

As far as our neighbors were concerned, each house had a field between it, and we didn't see many of them. I can't remember a single incident where neighbors lifted a hand to help each other in that neighborhood.

The same lack of neighborly spirit exists in the much more well-to-do country neighborhood where I live now. I will say there is no one-upmanship in this neighborhood. People don't compete to see who has the biggest and best cars and appliances or clothes.

Mal

georgehd
May 4, 2003 - 03:59 pm
Robby, you asked us to comment on the Greeks putting goodness after other things in life. I brought this up once before, but I wonder if Durant's view is entirely accurate. What does Durant say to support that statement? And what is our collective understanding of the word goodness? Do we mean being good and kind to one another? Or is there more to goodness than that? Carolyn, I am not sure that I agree with you about people today being different. I am constantly amazed at the TV news stories that involve basic goodness. Look at the reaction of people in New York to 9/11. There were a lot of heros then. I see the same thing in many of the interviews with service men in Iraq. A basic goodness comes through. The return to religion in the US is also probably a manifestation of a desire to be good.

At the same time I recognize that money and possessions are primary motivators for people. There needs to be a balance. I found it interesting that the corporate officers of the Enron Corp, while they were cheating the public out of billions of dollars, they also were supporting philanthropic organizations in their communities big time. They saw no crime in this. But I digress. The Greek society was a much simpler society.

robert b. iadeluca
May 4, 2003 - 04:06 pm
Durant contines:--

"In the Greek's view art was first of all an adornment of the ways and means of life. He wanted his pots and pans, his lamps and chests and tables and beds and chairs to be at once serviceable and beautiful, and never too elegant to be strong. Having a vivid 'sense of the state,' he identified himself with the power and glory of his city, and employed a thousand artists to embellish its public places, ennoble its festivals, and commemorate its history.

"Above all, he wished to honor or propitiate the gods, to express his gratitude to them for life or victory. He offered votive images, lavished his resources upon his temples, and engaged statuaries to give to his gods or his dead an enduring similitude in stone.

"Hence Greek art belonged not to a museum, where man might go to contemplate it in a rare moment of esthetic conscience, but to the actual interests and enterprises of the people. Its 'Apollos' were not dead marbles in a gallery, but the likenesses of beloved deities. Its temples no mere curiosities for tourists, but the homes of living gods.

"The artist, in this society, was not an insolvent recluse in a studio, working in a language alien to the common citizen. He was an artisan toiling with laborers of all degrees in a public and intelligible task. Athens brought together, from all the Greek world, a greater concourse of artists, as well as of philosophers and poets, than any other city except Renaissance Rome.

"These men, competing in fervent rivalry and cooperating under enlightened statesmanship, realized in fair measure the vision of Pericles."

"The artist, in this society, was not an insolvent recluse in a studio, working in a language alien to the common citizen."

In my estimation art, in much of our Western World, IS a language alien to the common citizen."

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
May 4, 2003 - 04:25 pm
In this link about LOVE OF ART, please read the paragraph under "Description."

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
May 4, 2003 - 06:27 pm

And that is why, when I was a den mother all those years ago, I took that Cub Scout troop to the Museum of Art in Indianapolis instead of letting them camp out in my back yard.

Remember the pottery I mentioned this morning? Well, my daughter went to a pottery fair today and came home with another bean pot for me. It's stoneware, and has a light blue cover and blue around the rim. The body looks as if blue has been sponged on light gray, but that's the effect of the glaze and the way it was fired. It's a sweet little pot and is sitting on a shelf of the bookcase right in front of me as I type this, under a print of Edward Hopper's painting "Lighthouse at Two Lights". With that to look at and James Galway playing on TV, I've had a pretty good evening.

Mal

gaj
May 4, 2003 - 07:25 pm
When I visited with my son,(he lives in New York City) I took myself to the Met. Museum of Art. I usually go to places like this with someone, but this time I was alone. What a great day I had. I could sit on a bench and study a painting. It was such a pleasure to take it all in at my own pace. I didn't take any tours. I just let the art speak to me.

Everyone should have a chance to see and decide what they like in the arts.

georgehd
May 4, 2003 - 08:13 pm
As one who worked in the field for many years and who is still involved in art education, I suppose that I have to agree that art remains alien to a majority of the people and this is a shame. Art like any other field requires exposure and knowledge to be understood. All too often, art is a neglected part of the school curriculum. Students get little exposure to the history of western art and no exposure to eastern art.

The art world, and here I mean the commercial art world, is an entity unto itself and here I would have to say that snob appeal plays a big part. There are art critics who basically speak only to other art critics = their language is beyond the comprehension of most of us. It would be like reading a modern physics text for most.

However, I firmly believe that education can make a difference. Artists can contribute much to society. I am sure that we all know of buildings that are functionally good but aesthetically awful. In movies I am very aware of those films that are shot with an artists eye and I do think that the general public appreciates them. Design is an important element in advertising, furniture making, clothing, etc. etc.

And I am not sure that older art is alien to most people. I am thinking of Greek and Classical Art as well as Renaissance Art. As we approach present day, art does become less accessable because the language has been modified. Just as modern physics is less accessable than Newtonian physics.

The successful artist today is not a recluse and is usually well off financially.

kiwi lady
May 4, 2003 - 09:29 pm
Art appreciation is also in the eye of the beholder and in the hands of the art critics. I cannot help thinking sometimes the art world is manipulated by these critics. If they say its stink everyone thinks its stink work but are they always right? I am very sceptical about the art world quite frankly! I think there are some so called artists laughing at the stupidity of critics. Its like the story of the Emperor with no clothes! If you tell the people often enough a piece of work is a great work they will agree not wishing to appear stupid! George am I being cynical as usual?

Carolyn

Malryn (Mal)
May 4, 2003 - 10:09 pm

I had drawn and painted pictures from the time I was a very little girl. Often I tried to copy illustrations in magazines and books. The first art museum I ever went in was the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston when I was 14 years old. I went there only because it was easy walking distance from the conservatory where I was studying music. I was curious and had some time before I had to catch the train home. The first painting I saw was by Titian, and I'll never forget how I felt. I knew nothing about fine art, and that was the day I began to learn.

Since then I've been in more galleries and art museums than I can remember, coast to coast. I almost always go alone, just as I was the first time I ever saw any art, though when we lived near Buffalo, we took the kids to the Albright-Knox Gallery quite often. I can remember pushing my daughter in a stroller there when she couldn't have been more than two years old. My kids' art education began a lot earlier than mine did. The Albright-Knox is one of my favorite galleries.

No critic or anyone else has ever influenced me when it comes to art. I actually prefer to go alone, so I can digest what I'm viewing without any sort of distraction.

My taste runs more to the contemporary than it does to the classics, though I like those, too, especially Correggio and David. I like Van Gogh, some French impressionists, Kokoschka, Picasso and many others. I've spent more time at the Museum of Modern Art in New York and the Guggenheim on Fifth Avenue and the one on lower Broadway than I have the Frick or the Met. I like the African Museum which is almost right next door to the Broadway branch of the Guggenheim.

I'm ashamed to say I've never been in the Whitney, though I've seen some good art in galleries in SoHo. The one and only time I was in Europe, I spent all of my time alone in art museums in the five different countries I visited, and had my first introduction to Max Ernst. I love art.

Mal

Justin
May 4, 2003 - 10:44 pm
An important element in the history of art is it's bipolar character. Artists and art schools are always moving in one of two directions. At one extreme is idealism and at the other extreme is realism.

The Greeks of Phidias's time were idealists. Line and form were simplified. Symmetry, and balance were admired. Approved proportion was considered essential for beauty. Clarity and order in everything was important. Normality had value.

The period in which idealism reigned supreme was very short. By mid fourth century the Greeks were already moving away from the ideal toward realism. This period of change in Greece is called Hellenism. They moved away from balance and symmetry in sculpture to introduce movement into forms. In painting the Hellenic Greeks introduced chiaroscuro, a technique of shading to bring about a third dimension on a two dimensional surface. It is easy to see the Hellenics are moving toward realism.

The entire history of Art is characterized by unique descriptions of movements toward or away from idealism. The Rennaisance, for example, is a movement rekindling the Greek ideas of symmetry while introducing new emphasis on balance and harmony in proportion. In architecture it represents a return to the geometric horizontality that was so characteristic of Greek Temples.

Here we are at the seminal point in art. We are at the benchmark for all subsequent art work. It is to this period and its characteristics that all art is compared. If art critics and art historians seem to speak a foreign language, it is because they seek reference language to the Greek ideal to express new art forms as they appear. Therefore I behoove those interested in art to pay particular attention to the elements of this period. The language of art is rooted right here, where we are now.

Bubble
May 5, 2003 - 03:35 am
almost 30 postings of importance to absorb! Mal's description of her living space, those links on symmetry art and beauty, so important and so neglected at the same time. That exercise of Mal's on symmetry was a beauty and looks almost as if taken from a Persian carpet adorning my hall. No wonder George gave us the link to those oriental carpets.



I think that real art appreciation becomes a second nature when we are daily exposed to it from early age. Art could be all the plastic visual arts, music and more. The walls in our schools were covered with reproductions of famous and classical paintings, the curriculum included regular concerts, plays, art classes on the different methods and schools, reading of classical texts of course. The highpoints of learning has changed and is more on technology, on subjects that could be used to bring more money in the future. I doubt there are more than two others in my daughter's acquaintances and friends who have ever been to a museum or an exhibition. She is considered odd when she prefers to go to a concert than to a disco. Her grand ma was guilty of putting her opera records on while doing the chores in the house while baby-sitting.



Functional art was found also in prehistorical time, some of those bone and ivory implements were beautiful. Greece is certainly recognized as a particularly rich period in art in that sense and I think that it is easier to identify with than the modern trend. I wonder why.



When painting or making a flower arrangement, I much enjoy an asymmetrical display. There too I wonder if it is a question of individual taste? But I know I wouldn't buy a totally asymmetrical carpet...

robert b. iadeluca
May 5, 2003 - 04:14 am
"Men paint themselves before they paint pictures, and adorn their bodies before building homes. Jewelry, like cosmetics, is as old as history. The Greek was an expert cutter and engraver of gems. He used simple tools of bronze -- plain and tubular drills, a wheel, and a polishing mixture of emery powder and oil. Yet his work was so delicate and minute that a microscope was probably required in executing the details, and is certainly needed in following them.

"Coins were not especially pretty at Athens, where the grim owl ruled the mint. Elis led all the mainland in this field, and towards the close of the fifth century Syracuse issued a dekadrachma that has never been surpassed in numismatic art.

"In metal work the masters of Chalcis maintained their leadership. Every Mediterranean city sought their iron, copper, and silver wares. Greek mirrors were more pleasing than mirrors by their nature can freuently be, for though one might not see the clearest of reflections in the polished bronze, the mirrors themselves were of varied and attractive shapes, often elaborately engraved, and upheld by figures of heroes, fair women, or gods."

I think of children of all ages who at fairs like to have their faces painted or enjoy looking like clowns. I think of American Indians and the various reasons they had for painting their bodies.

To me, coin collecting is dull but perhaps there are some avid coin collectors here.

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
May 5, 2003 - 04:46 am
Did you know that there is an International Magazine about Facepainting? Click HERE for a really FUN PACKED link. It takes a long time to load but it is well worth it (and there is background music).

When you get there, click onto the small word "enter." Then at the top is an orange bar with various sections. Go visit each section. It will cheer up your day!

Robby

robert b. iadeluca
May 5, 2003 - 05:05 am
All you ever wanted to know about COIN COLLECTING and more.

Robby

Éloïse De Pelteau
May 5, 2003 - 06:30 am
Art was a constant source of wonderment for me and the only source of beauty during my childhood. We were so fortunate to have had a piano given us by our grand'mother when I was 7 or 8 and our mother instilled in us the love of classical music and her love of literature was also passed down to us. She tought us to appreciate great works of art even if we could not afford museums. Our first radio was bought when I was about 10 and we listened to the Saturday afternoon opera from the NY Met, I still remember all the words from Carmen.

Our large family has members who lives by their art and other members paint on a regular basis in any case we all appeciate art in every form.

Eloïse

robert b. iadeluca
May 5, 2003 - 06:34 am
I still listen (occasionally) to the Texaco broadcasts of opera from the NY Met on Saturday afternoons. It has been going on all these decades.

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
May 5, 2003 - 06:53 am

My poor mother who was living in a two room and tiny kitchen, cold water, kerosene stove tenement when she died in 1940, listened to the Metropolitan opera company on the radio every Saturday afternoon, while she drank tea with cloves and sugar in it. Her legacy to me was her lovely singing voice, her love of music, and what she told me about opera, some arias of which I later sang in concerts and recitals.

I heard that Manon Lescaut will be performed on the Ovation Channel, if you get it, sometime this week.

Mal

Bubble
May 5, 2003 - 07:06 am
Robby, you have opened a new window for me! I was never much interested in make up, put this face painting is fascinating. I'd love to experiment.



Indian and North African communities here practice henna tattoes on hands and feet in the henna ceremony preceding a wedding. It brings luck and wards off evil eye apparently. The designs cover the hands and fingers and are as intricate as delicate lace. The henna wears off in time of course.

robert b. iadeluca
May 5, 2003 - 07:09 am
Bubble:--Maybe down the line you can email us a photo of you with your face all painted up!

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
May 5, 2003 - 07:19 am

Ancient Greek jewelry. Be sure to click NEXT at the bottom of the page

More Ancient Greek jewelry

robert b. iadeluca
May 5, 2003 - 07:37 am
When I look at that fine jewelry, I increasingly realize that while it was created over 2,500 years ago, it was still far far ahead of that man starting a fire in our Heading. Putting it another way, the period of development from that cave-man through Sumeria to the time of Athens was enormous compared to the brief time that has elapsed from Ancient Greece to now.

I knew all this but I have to keep reminding myself that the process of Civilization was over millions of years, not just mere thousands. Sumeria was just the culture that Durant arbitrarily chose as being "civilized."

Robby

Malryn (Mal)
May 5, 2003 - 07:49 am

"The Greeks also had their own unique styles of wearing their hair. Between 1500 and 650 B.C., Greek women wore their hair long and in corkscrew curls. Later, around 500-300 B.C., women began to wear their hair in what was termed 'the Greek knot' which was basically a bun at the bottom of the neck. Soon, knots and buns were all the rage in Greece. It seemed that Greek women also had a penchant for highlighting their hair, which they did with saffron. The Greeks also developed a calamistrum, which was a hollow bronze stick used to reshape their hair."

  • ******************************************************

    "By the 7th century BC, Athens had developed into a mercantile center in which hundreds of perfumers set up shop. Trade was heavy in fragrant herbs such as marjoram, lily, thyme, sage, anise, rose and iris, infused into olive, almond, castor and linseed oils to make thick unguents. These were sold in small, elaborately decorated ceramic pots, similar to the smaller jars still sold in Athens today. (Keville, Green) Socrates disapproved of perfume. He believed that it might blur the distinction between slaves (who smelled bad) and free men (who didn’t)."


    Ancient Greece mirrors, jewelry and perfume
  • Malryn (Mal)
    May 5, 2003 - 07:59 am

    "Luxurious in spray of myrtle, she wore, too,
    the glory of the rose upon her, and her hair
    was all a darkness on her shoulder and her back."


    Archilochus

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 5, 2003 - 09:12 am

    Sir Donn has posted a link in the Cafe to a most remarkable site about the evolution of humans. If you have Flash and a high speed connection, you'll be able to see the story of Lucy and more about our evolution. Click the thumbnail image on the upper right by the words: "Journey through the story of evolution."

    Becoming Human

    georgehd
    May 5, 2003 - 09:31 am
    Thanks Mal for the link Becoming Human; there is a book Becoming Human by Ian Tattersall (1998) that was described as "a must read for everyone intrigued by their origins and place in nature". It was given to me by a friend and I confess I have not read it.

    Justin
    May 5, 2003 - 01:00 pm
    In post 531 I encouraged us to pay particular attention to the characteristics of Periclean art because these characteristics- balanced proportion, order, simplicity, symmetry, and generalization, tended to create ideal forms which are seminal in the history of art. They are used as a basis for comparison with every school of art since that time. In the last paragraph of 531, I goofed a little by not clearly pointing to the fourth quarter of the fifth century as the time we are now examining.

    georgehd
    May 5, 2003 - 02:44 pm
    Justin, I found your post 531 most interesting and to the point. We jump so quickly from post to post that I forgot to comment on your post. I was wondering where you place modern art in the history of art - idealism or realism? It does not fit into either category, so where do we put it? It seems to me to be a third type in which an entirely new aesthetic has been adopted. Yet form, balance, symmetry are still important, though they may not appear so.

    Sea bubble your comments about symmetry made me laugh as my wife, an artist, looks for balance and not symmetry. Odd numbers of flowers are used in an arrangement. Odd numbers of plants are planted in the garden = and believe it or not it looks better.

    It is a shame (sea bubble) that your grandchildren are not getting the kind of art exposure that you got but I suspect that is a function of the times in Israel. The children on this island do not get exposure either, so I emailed a friend of mine in the Department of Education, the web addresses that have been posted by Mal. Perhaps the web can be a useful resource in Israel.

    kiwi lady
    May 5, 2003 - 03:30 pm
    A landscaper friend told me you should use multiples of 3 for planting. that is 3, or 9 or 15 etc looks better- it does too!

    Carolyn

    georgehd
    May 5, 2003 - 04:37 pm
    Carolyn we always use multiples of three.

    There was a good article on modern art in the NYTimes, Magazine section April 6, 2003. The following link gets a synopsis but you have to pay for the article on line. I had saved it.

    http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F40F12FE385D0C758CDDAD0894DB404482

    "the greatest generation - the most influential American artists weren't Pollack or de Kooning. They were the ones who came next, Minimalists, Conceptualists, Earth artists - who redefined what art was and who arenow finally celebrated in a spectacular new museum." It is the Dia beacon which opens May 18th in Beacon, NY. "The work these artists made changed or at least questioned the nature of art; what it looked like, its size, its materials, its attitude toward the places where it was shown, its relation to architecture, light and space and to the land. The artists even questioned whether art needed to be a tangible object."

    Unfortunately I cannot post images from the article.

    kiwi lady
    May 5, 2003 - 05:56 pm
    Art is all around us. A big tree which has shed its leaves for winter is one of the most beautiful pieces of sculpture. River stones in bulk in a dry river bed are incredibly beautiful. This is when photography comes into its own. I think nature provides us with the most incredible art forms. You have just lost one of the most incredible pieces of natural sculpture in the world.

    Carolyn

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 5, 2003 - 06:02 pm
    "Sometimes the potters burnt into the vase a word of love for a boy. Even Pheidias followed this custom when he carved upon the finger of his Zeus the words, 'pantarkes is fair.' In the first half of the fifth century the red-figure style reached its apex in the Achilles and Penthesilea vase, the Aesop and the Fox cup in the Vatican, and the Berlin Museum Orpheus among the Thracians.

    "More beautiful still were the white lekythoi of the midcentury. These slender flasks were dedicated to the dead, and were usually buried with them, or thrown upon the pyre to let their fragrant oils mingle with the flames. The vase painters ventureed into individuality, and sometimes fired the clay with subjects that would have startled the staid masters of the Archaic age. One vase allows Athenian youths to embrace courtesans shamelessly. Another shows men vomiting as they come from a banquet. Other vases do what they can for sex education.

    "The heroes of Periclean vase painting -- Brygus, Sotades, and Meidias -- abandoned the old myths, and chose scenes from the life of their times, delighting above all in the graceful movement of woman and the natural play of the child. They drew more faithfully than their predecessors. They showed the body in three-quarters view as well as in profile. They produced light and shade by using thin or thick solutions of the glaze. They modeled the figures to show contours and depth, and the folds of feminine drapery.

    "Corinth and Sicilian Gela were also centers of fine vase painting in this age, but no one questioned the superiority of the Athenians. It was not the competition of other potters that overcame the artists of the Ceramicus. It was the rise of a rival art of decoration.

    "The vase painters tried to meet the attack by imitating the themes and styles of the muralists. But the taste of the age went against them, and slowly, as the fourth century advanced, pottery resigned itself to being more and more an industry, less and less an art."

    One would gather, fortunately for us, that there were no censors at that time.

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 5, 2003 - 06:24 pm

    Why should the Ancient Greeks censor paintings of behavior which was acceptable in society and not really considered sinful or obscene? We'd never consider censoring Betty Crocker.

    Mal

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 5, 2003 - 06:32 pm

    The page linked below is in Italian. The first picture is the Law of Athens. Scroll down, please, to see Lekythoi.



    Picture of Lekythoi and others

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 5, 2003 - 06:41 pm

    Vase by Meidias

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 5, 2003 - 06:51 pm

    Scroll down to see work by Sotades

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 5, 2003 - 06:58 pm

    More Greek vases including the Achilles slaying Penthesilea vase

    Éloïse De Pelteau
    May 5, 2003 - 07:13 pm
    Justin, thank you for your post # 531 on art history and for writing it in a style that is easy to understand, avoiding too many academic terminology. Somehow I think that I will never look at art the same way after going through Life of Greece. I printed your post to study it more closely.

    Mal, those links are beautiful, thanks.

    Eloïse

    Justin
    May 5, 2003 - 11:04 pm
    Yes, George, the trouble with generalizations is they tend to become useless when the mold changes. The mold, as you have recognized,is representationalism and perhaps, even figurative representationalism. However there is still some play in the concept, even in modern art.

    Abstract forms are a derivation of reality. They tend to be generalized forms rather than specific and to the extent that they express a generalized view of a concept, they are not an expression of reality but an idealized form. What can be said for Dadaism? Here we have a super reality in the found art of Duchamp.

    Where in the spectrum can one place Abstract expressionism? There are challenges in a polarized description of art. No question about that. Some things fall outside the mold. Natural art, of course, is the ultimate reality as photo realism is not. When Rene Magritte tells us "This is not a pipe", he is expressing the separation between art and reality as it is at the extreme end of the bipolar concept.

    Bubble
    May 6, 2003 - 02:14 am
    Carolyn, nature has always been my inspiration and wonder.



    George, yes uneven number always look better somehow. Even a family looks better with a child than only a couple.
    I was talking of my children's different values in Israel compared to what I received in the middle of dark Africa. Although in their late 20s and early 30s, they show no inclination to marry and give me grandchildren. It is their life and decision, I will not live it for them.



    Justin, I got lost with your last post. I'll have to think about the meaning of polarised description and bipolar concept.



    Those links Mal make me dream... I wish I could pay a visit back in time. I don't understand censure there either. It would be like clothing the David. Bubble



    P.S. Found this quote today:



    The end of the human race will be that it will eventually die of civilization.
    -Ralph Waldo Emerson, writer and philosopher (1803-1882)

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 6, 2003 - 03:40 am
    Justin, like Bubble I "got lost with your last post." I'm just a poor little country boy who needs "big time" words and concepts brought down to my simplistic level. But I'm trying to learn!

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 6, 2003 - 04:05 am
    Durant moves on --

    "In the sixth century, it is chiefly ceramic, devoted to the adornment of vases.

    "In the fifth it is chiefly architectural, giving color to public buildings and statues.

    "In the fourth it hovers between the domestic and the individual, decorating dwelling and making portraits.

    "In the Hellenistic Age it is chiefly individual, producing easel pictures for private purchasers.

    "Greek painting begins as an offshoot of drawing, and remains to the end a matter essentially of drawing and design. In its development it uses three methods --

    1 - fresco, or painting upon wet plaster
    2 - tempera, or painting upon wet cloth or boards with colors mixed with the white of eggs, and
    3 - encaustic, which mixed the colors with melted wax. This is as near as antiquity comes to paianting in oils.

    "Pliny, whose will to believe somtimes rivals that of Herodotus, assures us that the art of painting was already so advanced in the eighth century that Candaules, King of Lydia, paid its weight in gold for a picture by Bularchus. However, all beginngs are mysteries. We may judge the high repute of painting in Greece from the fact that Pliny gives it more space than to sculpture.

    "Apparently the great paintings of the classic and Hellenistic periods were as much discussed by the critics, and as highly regarded by the people, as the most distingished specimens of architecture or statuary."

    Following along with Durant has helped me to back up and take the long perspective, i.e. centuries, not years. As I view the disputes going on in the present-day artistic world, I wonder if, some day in the future, historians will speak of artistic stages in terms of 19th century, 20th, 21st, etc.

    As for the various types of artistic media described above, again I am still that poor little country boy hoping to understand them in words I learned at my mother's knee.

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 6, 2003 - 04:49 am
    Those participants who went through all or most of "Our Oriental Heritage" may find this ARTICLE on languages from this morning's NY Times of interest.

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 6, 2003 - 06:53 am

    Justin mentioned "balanced proportion, order, simplicity, symmetry, and generalization." I’m not sure what he means by generalization, but you’ll see the rest if you click the link below.

    Athena Temple

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 6, 2003 - 07:28 am

    Justin mentioned some types of art. Linked below are examples of abstract art, Dadaism and Surrealism.

    Kandinsky Composition VII (abstract)

    Bicycle Wheel by Duchamp. Made with found objects

    The Mountaineer by Magritte. Surrealism

    depfran
    May 6, 2003 - 07:35 am
    I can see that at the end of the 19th century, Emerson gives a dark view of the civilization to come.(From Bubble's quote), Also in his book, the brothers karamazov, written just befor his death, Dostoevsky foresaw the 20th century dark age taking form. He writes:'' Why, the isolation that prevails everywhere, above all in our age-it has not fully developed, it has not reached it's limit yet. For everyone strives to keep his individuality as apart as possible, wishes to secure the greatest possible fullness of life for himself; but meantime all his efforts result not in attaining fullness of life but self-destruction, for instead of self-realization he ends by arriving at complete isolation...But this terrible individualism must inevitably have an end, and all will suddenly understand how unnaturally they have separated from one another. It will be the spirit of the time , and people will marvel that they have sat so long in darkness without seeing the light.'' Today, I am optimist because we see a collective effort to save the humanity from self-destruction. If this golden age takes form in reality, will the art return towards a symmetrical and ideal form? Françoise Depelteau

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 6, 2003 - 07:39 am

    Below is a link to “This is not a pipe” by surrealist Rene Magritte which Justin mentioned and an example of Dadaism by Duchamp, "Woman descending a staircase". What you see is part of the progression from the pole of classic symmetrical art in the Athena Temple to an opposite pole of abstraction.
    Magritte’s pipe

    Duchamp’s Nude descending a staircase

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 6, 2003 - 08:11 am

    As a native born New Englander, I applaud individualism. People who are familiar with that area know that New Englanders also band and bond together because of their heritage, part of which is the Transcendentalism of Ralph Waldo Emerson, an example of which is seen in BUBBLE's quote. To native New Englanders, New England is a separate entity from the rest of this country, a whole, complete in itself. This is not the only section of the United States which thinks this way.

    The French Impressionists were the first to break away from the realism in art which had come before. Justin will correct me here if I'm wrong. I find that period in art and the twentieth century a very, very exciting time for art. In the 1960's art had reached a pole directly opposite from what had started in Ancient Greece. I'm glad I've been alive and able to witness it. Artists had truly broken away from representational Realism and Idealism to a kind of art which abstracted nearly everything. Abstract Expressionism is a good example of this.

    The pendulum swings, and there is currently a turn to Realism again. In the 60's artist Frank Stella had reduced art to a kind of linear abstraction with symmetrical lines on black backgrounds. He had reduced the Greek ideal to simple lines.

    An article in the recent New York Times magazine tells and shows how Stella has turned from Minimalism to a kind of Maximumism in his work. Though his three dimensional art now is not representational in the classic sense, it is much more representational than it was before.

    People feel threatened by what they do not understand, and abstract art sometimes can seem hard to comprehend. As with all art, no sculpture or painting is complete without a viewer and that viewer's reaction. In the attempt to put something realistic and familiar into what is abstract, the viewer can become confused -- and upset because of that confusion.

    Viewing abstract art is a little like learning another language. In my opinion, the best way to learn a language is to accept the different words and sounds of the new language without trying to translate them into your native tongue. The same is true of abstract art. It is a different language, which when viewed, should not be translated into something it is not.

    Mal

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 6, 2003 - 08:49 am

    There is order in chaos.

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 6, 2003 - 09:11 am

    "One of the earliest pictures recorded by Pliny (xxxv. represented a battle of the Magnesians (c. 716 B.C.); it was painted by Bularchus, a Lydian artist, and bought at a high price by King Candaules. Many other important Greek historical paintings are mentioned by Pausanias and earlier writers. The Pompeian mosaic of the defeat of the Persians by Alexander is probably a Romanized copy from some celebrated Greek painting; it obviously was not designed for mosaic work.

    "Landscape painting appears to have been unknown among the Greeks, even as a background to figure-subjects. The poems especially of Homer and Sophocles show that this was not through want of appreciation of the beauties of nature, but partly, probably, because the main object of Greek painting was to tell some definite story, and also from their just sense of artistic fitness, which prevented them from attempting in their mural decorations to disguise the flat solidity of the walls by delusive effects of aerial perspective and distance."


    Quoted from HERE

    Tejas
    May 6, 2003 - 01:13 pm
    Unfortunately, I was recently given a very official trespass citation from both the Fondren Library at Rice University in Houston and the Bellingham Public Library, State of Washington because young people, backed by their parents, so loudly object to my presence on a computer in their "den", the public library. Perhaps I may resume our discussion at some other "secret place."

    georgehd
    May 6, 2003 - 01:24 pm
    Mal, your post 568 is brilliant!! I am finding the comparisons of Greek art and Modern art most interesting as one has to ask what questions the artist was asking himself as he broke away from traditional representation. I, personally, have been most interested in how photography, which was not considered an art form until the 20th century, influenced people like Duchamp, Picasso, Matisse, etc. The Nude Descending a Stair Case probably was influenced by the work of Muyerbridge (sp) who photographed the motion of animals, particularly horses.

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 6, 2003 - 02:00 pm

    George, I am humbled by what you said. Below is a link to a Muybridge photograph which reminds me of Duchamps' Nude descending a staircase.

    Photograph by Eadweard Muybridge

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 6, 2003 - 03:45 pm

    I was wondering where you were, Tejas. Good luck on your quest for a computer.

    Mal

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 6, 2003 - 04:54 pm
    "Painting was now sufficiently advanced to enable Panaenus, brother (or nephew) of Pheidias, to make recognizable portraits of the Athenian and Persian generals in his Battle of Marathon. But it still placed all figures in one plane, and made them of one stature. It indicated distance not by a progressive diminution of size and a modeling with light and shade, but by covering more of the lower half of the farther figures with the curves that represented the ground.

    "Towards 440 a vital step forward was taken. Atatharchus, employed by Aeschylus and Sophocles to paint scenery for their plays, perceived the connection between light and shade and distance, and wrote a treatise on perspective as a means of creating theatrical illusion.

    "Anaxagoras and Democritus took up the idea from the scientific angle, and at the end of the century Apollodorus of Athens won the name of skiagraphos, or shadow painter, because he made pictures in chiaroscuro -- i.e. in light and shade. Hence Pliny spoke of him as 'the first to paint objects as they really appeared.'"

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 6, 2003 - 05:47 pm

    Zeus of Pheidias

    georgehd
    May 6, 2003 - 08:24 pm
    A nude going up.

    http://www.masters-of-photography.com/M/muybridge/muybridge_ascending_stairs.html

    Justin
    May 7, 2003 - 12:06 am
    Mal; Thanks for getting me out of trouble. I sometimes go too far with a subject but I was happy that you followed along so well. Generalization is a way of idealizing an image. It's opposite is the "Specific", which in art is reality.

    The relationship of reality to impressionism is an interesting one for Impressionism deals with what one sees as opposed to what one knows, is. Think ,for example, of a mixing bowl, your own perhaps. Immediately, an image of the bowl comes into your mind. It is round, it is white, it is deep. You can see all of it.

    You then go to the kitchen and see your bowl in the window. The sun is on it. You have to squint to see it. You can really see only one side. The other is in the sun. And you can't be sure about it's color. Its shape looks a little fuzzy too. If you came back after an hour and looked at the bowl again you would see some thing entirely different. Is this the bowl you saw in your mind earlier. Not at all. We now have three images of the bowl. One is reality and two are the subject of Impressionism. Thats why the class is called Impressionism.

    Art historians are concerned with the classification of art objects. The task is accomplished in two ways. First by describing the object in terms that give it a unique identity and second by relating it to other objects both in time and subject matter. This process leads to confusion by the unitiated as George pointed out so well.

    3kings
    May 7, 2003 - 01:33 am
    MALRYN You write:-

    "In my opinion, the best way to learn a language is to accept the different words and sounds of the new language without trying to translate them into your native tongue."

    If you can do that, your brain structure must be quite different to mine. I have learnt some Polish, and the follwing two senteces mean the same

    I prefer Landscapes to Portraits
    Ja wole Widoki od Portretow

    When I see 'Portretow' I see it probably means 'Portrait' and such clues and connections are vital for my mind to achieve understanding.

    If I do not understand what I am saying then I will surely be speaking nonsense. When learning another language, I must first know the english words, and then translate them into the second language.

    After much practice and sufficient time, I will I hope learn Polish well enough to think in Polish, and not translate to and from English first.. I do not see any other way of grasping a second language.-- Trevor

    3kings
    May 7, 2003 - 02:05 am
    I perhaps am showing my distressing ignorance of Art, but what has a photograph of an underground railway got to do with "Nude descending a staircase" as in MAL's recent link? Am I too literal in my thinking to see what others see?=== Trevor

    Bubble
    May 7, 2003 - 03:05 am
    Did you see him DESCENDING Trevor? *grin*
    Then I wonder if I can trust my mind structures .



    When first in contact with a foreigh language I tend to search for familiar sounds and use comparisons to guess the meanings. This works well in European languages. It was totally useless on arriving in Israel and even lent itself to some embarrassing quiproquos. I had to memorize sentences and know their meanings.



    If I used memporized words and started building my own sentences, I got it all wrong and full of mistakes because in French all the words are feminine or masculine and so they are in Hebrew, but you can never guess which will be what. On top of that Hebrew accords verbs in feminine or masculine version according to the subject, possessive adjectives are not linked to the object possessed but to the owner. It is a whole different logic.



    Other languages, like Chinese and some African ones are based on their "music" waves, and their meaning changes completely if they are pronounced in an ascending or descending tone of voice.



    Speaking Spanish, and for example wanting to say you were embarassed to ask something, Never never use the term 'sono embarassado'!
    Bubble

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 7, 2003 - 03:19 am
    Nice to hear from you again, Trevor!! I realize you are always lurking with us.

    When I wzs in high school, I was taught that the French word for girl was "fille." I learned much later that one had to say "jeune fille" which does not mean young girl but just girl. "Fille" by itself implies a prostitute. As Bubble says, we just have to memorize meanings.

    Robby

    Bubble
    May 7, 2003 - 03:26 am
    Fille et garcon.
    In a cafe you would call the 'garcon' to take your order.



    In chat, it always make me laugh when I am asked "are you a lady?" I feel more like an impish commoner.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 7, 2003 - 03:30 am
    "Just as Solon frowned upon the theatrical art as a deception, so the artists seem to have thought it against their honor, or beneath their dignity, to give to a plane surface the appearance of three dimensions. Nevertheless it was through perspective and chiaroscuro that Zenxis, pupil of Apollodorus, made himself the supreme figure in fifth-century painting.

    "He came from Heracleia (Pontica?) to Athens about 414. Even amid the noise of war his coming was considered an event. He was a 'character,' bold and conceited, and he painted with a swashbuckling brush. At the Olympic games he strutted about in a checkered tunic on which his name was embroidered in gold. He could afford it, since he had already acquired 'a vast amount of wealth' from his paintings. But he worked with the honest care of a great artist, and when Agatharchus boasted of his own speed of execution, Zeuxis said quietly, 'I take a long time.'

    "He gave away many of his masterpieces, on the ground that no price could do them justice. Cities and kings were happy to receive them."

    It's interesting how many artists are considered "characters." People who know absolutely nothing about art have heard about Picasso and nothing about him except that he "strutted about."

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 7, 2003 - 03:55 am
    Can art be made by nature and not by man? And if it can, can humans be so attached to it that when it dies, they cry and leave memorials? Click onto the article about THE OLD MAN OF THE MOUNTAIN in this morning's NY Times.

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 7, 2003 - 04:02 am
    Click HERE for a photo of The Old Man of the Mountain. Be sure to click onto the small photo to get the full feeling of nature's art.

    Robby

    Bubble
    May 7, 2003 - 04:54 am
    Is it art mainly when it resembles something man made? Thanks for the picture, it was new to me.



    Dali was really a character, down to his moustache.

    Éloïse De Pelteau
    May 7, 2003 - 04:56 am
    Fabulous posts about art here where a person can learn so much. Thank you all.

    Mal said: "In my opinion, the best way to learn a language is to accept the different words and sounds of the new language without trying to translate them into your native tongue" Yes that's it.

    To learn another language one must let the sound become as familiar as the mother tongue at first not being aware of grammar, verb tense, gender etc. but it becomes like a favorite piece of music where you can anticipate each note.

    When I first heard English spoken I was struck by its musicality, and tried to memorize strings of words. It takes a while before being able to speak and think in another language without translating one must be quite familiar with it. I know a family here where the mother is Danish, the father Dutch, the 3 kids go to school in French and they speak English perfectly well. Pre schoolers can speak several languages. They just reproduce sounds.

    Art is quite another thing. It is visual only. I doubt if I will ever be able to appreciate modern art to its just value. I don't have the time or the inclination to study it enough to learn about it.

    Eloïse

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 7, 2003 - 06:45 am

    When I came in here just after 12:30 early this morning, there were no new posts. Coming in here now, I found 11 posts so full of things to talk about that I don't know where to begin.

    Eloise says art is visual. To me Visual Art is not just visual; it is emotional and intellectual. I say that because when I view paintings, sculpture and architecture I react in an emotional and intellectual way. I have never studied studio art or art history. Anything I know about paintings and sculpture has come firsthand by visits to museums and galleries and by looking at pictures of art in books and on the web. I don't know how I've picked up what little I know about art history because there's never been an effort on my part to learn it.

    Bubble mentioned Dali. Dali was a masterful painter. He managed to get a thick, lush look to his paintings by using very little paint. I was very surprised when I read this somewhere.

    When I view his paintings, I don't try to interpret them. Some I find very, very amusing. Some I find disturbing. I've used many of Dali's paintings as illustrations in my electronic magazines.

    Below is a link to a painting by Dali which I like very much that I believe not too many people have seen.

    Painting by Dali

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 7, 2003 - 06:54 am
    When I first heard about the fall of the Old Man of the Mountain, I was crushed and felt as if something had been taken away from me -- like an arm or a leg. The Old Man of the Mountain is a part of New England that has always been there. I'm sure there are many of us who thought it would never go away. The Old Man of the Mountain was not a piece of nature's art to me. It was much more than that. In many ways, it was a symbol of New England and the spirit of New England and New Englanders, strong, rugged, tough, able to withstand heat and cold, ice and snow, fierce winds, blizzards and hurricanes.

    I've seen the Old Man of the Mountain many, many times, the last time on a gray day with a sky full of storm clouds. There is no possible way it could be reproduced. If people try to do this I know I'll never look at it.

    Mal

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 7, 2003 - 07:30 am

    Trevor has asked two questions, one about the Muybridge photograph of a tunnel I linked here and the other about a statement I made about learning a different language.

    I am an artist -- at least I have the heart and soul of one. People like me do not see things in the way people who are not artists do. I can't explain the difference because I am as I am and do not see any other way than the way I do, but I know when I've pointed out colors and shapes in nature that I see and perceive people have looked at me as if I'm a little bit crazy because they are unable to see them.

    Because of the perspective, I see movement in the wall on the left of the photograph of the tunnel I posted that is very similar to the movement Duchamp captured in his "Nude descending a staircase." Muybridge was able to show the movement and speed of a slow-moving train in that very artistic photograph.



    I first started studying languages other than English when I was 14 years old. The first one was Latin. The following year I began to study French. From the very first day the door of that classroom was opened and closed, we students heard, read and spoke nothing but French. None of us knew the language when we walked in the first day. We knew a great deal at the end of the school year.

    All other French classes in the high school where I went were conducted the same way. So were the high school Italian class where I studied Italian for two years and the Italian classes in college where I spoke, read and wrote that language for another two. In the beginning classes in high school we were given lists of vocabulary words to learn, but many of the words we learned were "shown" to us by teachers who pointed at objects or people and spoke the words in the new language which meant what the objects or people were. At one time I was studying and reading three languages other than English at the same time.

    When a different language is introduced to you in this way, you stop thinking in English. When I studied Russian briefly, I not only had to learn vocabulary, I had to learn a different alphabet. Later I learned a little Slovak from a friend and could see similarities to Russian.

    I sang Russian songs in Russian and German lieder in German. I never had a class in German, but by learning the words of the songs I learned enough about the language that when I go on a German web page I am able to read a good deal of what's there. I am able to read web pages in Spanish because I studied Italian and Latin.

    Though I spoke French and Italian relatively well at one time, I don't speak them very well any more because there's been no one to talk to. I imagine that if I were in France or Italy for any length of time, I'd pick those languages up again very quickly.

    I think part of my ability to learn languages came from the fact that I began learning how to play the piano at the age of 8 and had to learn that language, too. My mind was opened up early to different kinds of languages. Studying and playing and singing music also trains the ear, and that is very important when learning spoken languages. Unfortunately, I never seemed able to learn the languages of math and science very well.

    Mal

    Bubble
    May 7, 2003 - 08:41 am
    Mal that picture of Dali is so unusual and a beauty. I don't kow why it reminds me of Gustave Courbet. Would you know its name? I would like to find a shaper image of it for saving.



    Learning a language is very much like learning music. It is not only grammar and words. Each language has its beauty and character too. Some I will never master now because my throat or mouth cannot reproduce the unusual sounds. It was very hard to master the 'th' sound not not to roll my 'r's when I was in UK but somehow I learned to do it. That proper accent or pronunciation was the first thing I lost on learning Hebrew where I had to master gutturals and throaty sounds.



    Have you ever heard the grandeur of spoken classical Greek? or the soft tenderness of Greek love songs?

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 7, 2003 - 08:46 am

    A story about Zeuxis

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 7, 2003 - 09:14 am

    BUBBLE, the Dali painting I linked is called "Person at the Window". That is the best image of it I can find. I lightened it and brightened the contrast between light and shadow ( chiaroscuro ! ) as best I could on a graphics program I have ( Adobe PhotoDeluxe ) before I put it on that web page.

    I have not heard classical Greek spoken, but have heard Greek love songs.

    Mal

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 7, 2003 - 12:55 pm
    "Zeuxis had only one rival in his generation -- Parrhasius of Ephesus, almost as great and quite as vain. Parrhasius wore a golden crown on his head and said that in him the art had reached perfection. He did it all in lusty good humor, singing as he painted. Gossip said that he had bought a slave and tortured him to study facial expression in pain for a picture of Prometheus, but people tell many stories about artists.

    "Like Zeuxis he was a realist. The Runner was portrayed with such versimilitude that those who beheld it expected the perspiration to fall from the picture, and the athlete to drop from exhaustion. He drew an immense mural of The People of Athens, representing them as implacable and merciful, proud and humble, fierce and timid, fickle and generous -- and so faithfully that the Athenian public, we are informed, realized for the first time its own complex and contradictory character.

    "A great rivaly brought him into public competition with Zeuxis. The latter painted some grapes so naturally that birds tried to eat them. The judges were enthusiastic about the picture and Zeuxis, confident of victory, bade Parrhasius draw aside the curtain that concealed the Ephesian's painting. But the curtain proved to be a part of the picture, and Zeuxis, having himself been deceived, handsomely acknowledgd his defeat.

    "Zeuxis suffered no loss of reputtion. At Crotona he agreed to paint a Helen for the temple of Lacinian Hera, on condition that the five loveliest women of the city should pose in the nude for him, so that he might select from each her fairest feature, and combine them all in a second goddess of beauty. Penelope, too, found new life under his brush. But he admired more his portrait of an athlete, and wrote under it that men would find it easier to criticize him than to equal him.

    "All Greece enjoyed his conceit, and talked about him as much as of any dramatist, statesmen, or general. Only the prize fighters outdid his fame."

    I remember seeing a painting in the Louvre (I don't remember its name) where the person was looking through the window and part of the person was outside the frame of the window. It was SO real.

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 7, 2003 - 01:28 pm

    There is a type of painting called "Tromp l'oeil" or "Fool the eye". The artist paints so realistically that people think the objects painted are real.

    Today many artists are called on to paint shelves full of books, copper pots hanging from hooks, a hanging planter with a plant in it, etc., on walls, especially in kitchens and bathrooms. I have friends who had this done in their house, and I see such things on Home and Garden TV shows. Though I admit that such painting is remarkable, I prefer not to own or look at paintings which are more like photographs than not.

    This type of reality painting is a matter of personal taste, not a real criterion by which one can judge art.

    Mal

    georgehd
    May 7, 2003 - 01:43 pm
    Robby (or some one) - would you post or email me where we are in Durant's book and where we will be going? I will be in Baltimore tomorrow for ten days and will pick up a copy of the appropriate book or books and bring it back to Cayman. Thanks

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 7, 2003 - 01:45 pm

    Below is a link which takes you to a page full of contemporary trompe l'oeil painting done in a bathroom. I found page after page of trompe l'oeil artwork painted by artists who are seeking work by doing this kind of art. William Harnett was a well-known trompe l'oeil painter. The method has existed since 400 BCE.

    Bathroom with trompe l'oeil painting

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 7, 2003 - 01:52 pm
    George,we are on Page 318 in the book and are about to begin the section on "The Masters of Sculpture."

    Robby

    kiwi lady
    May 7, 2003 - 02:26 pm
    I have seen the Dali painting before. I like it too.

    I don't consider myself an artist in any way but see art all around me in nature. I can stand for ages just regarding the skeleton of a tree with the leaves all gone. Also I see all sorts in rock formations and in stands of trees. Nature is a fine artist- at least to my eyes.

    Carolyn

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 7, 2003 - 02:55 pm

    There is chaos in nature. That's why I posted that there is order in chaos, as scientists will tell you. Below is a link to two sites about chaos in nature. The first is from Amazon. Scroll down to read the review of the book. The second is photographs. Both are titled "Nature's Chaos". Click the small pictures to see larger ones.

    Nature’s Chaos, the book

    Nature’s Chaos, photographs

    georgehd
    May 7, 2003 - 03:40 pm
    I do not think that there is "art" in nature; art for me is man made and the field of art is defined by man.

    That is not to say that there is no beauty in nature for of course there is; the beauty in nature affords man one of the real pleasures of life. How or why that beauty exists is another question. One could of course attribute this beauty to the ultimate artist - God. This would be part of your belief system. I admit that I have trouble trying to explain all of the beauty in nature from a scientific perspective. But a lot of it does arise from well explained phenomena. I have to go out but will think about this some more. It is an interesting topic; certainly the Greeks saw beauty in their surroundings.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 7, 2003 - 05:42 pm
    Durant moves us on to --
    The Masters of Sculpture

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 7, 2003 - 05:50 pm
    "The love of form made even the painting of the classic age (if we may judge it from hearsay) a statuesque study in line and design rather than a sensuous seizure of the colors of life. The Hellene delighted rather in sculpture. He filled his home, his temples, and his graves with terra-cotta statuettes, worshiped his gods with images of stone, and marked the tombs of his departed with stelae reliefs that are among the commonest and most moving products of Greek art.

    "The artisans of the stelae were simple workers who carved by rote, and repeated a thousand times the familiar theme of the quiet parting, with clasped hands, of the living from the dead. But the theme itself is noble enough to bear repetition, for it shows classic restraint at its best, and teaches even a romantic soul that feeling speaks with most power when it lowers its voice.

    "These slabs show us the dead most often in some characteristic occupation of life -- a child playing with a hoop -- a girl carrying a jar -- a warrior proud in his armor -- a young woman admiring her jewels -- a boy reading a book while his dog lies content but watchful under his chair.

    "Death in these stelae is made natural, and therefore forgivable."

    Your comments, please?

    Robby

    Éloïse De Pelteau
    May 7, 2003 - 06:06 pm
    ANCIENT GREEK STATUES

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 7, 2003 - 06:59 pm
    That's a marvelous link, Eloise, and certainly enough statues to warrant a LONG look!

    Robby

    Bubble
    May 8, 2003 - 02:40 am
    But surely death is natural and must be thus accepted? So what is there to add?



    Eloise, those statues are recognised as much as old friends. But I never thought to buy one. I can't imagine one in a private home. Although small scaled bronze ones like those shown on the bottom of your site could make wonderful figurines for a chess game.



    To add to Geaorge's note. What is beauty in nature? it is so relative... we call it that because it pleases our eye, but by itself it is just a way to exist.
    Not all find the same things to be beautiful. I feel very uncomfortable in mountainous country and would never find it beautiful I think. My eye can find splendor in a raging sea.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 8, 2003 - 04:58 am
    "More complex, and supreme in their kind, are the sculptured reliefs of this age. In one of them Orpheus bids a lingering farewell to Eurydice, whom Hermes has reclaimed for the nether world. In another Demeter gives to Triptolemus the golden grain by which he is to establish agriculture in Greece. Here some of the coloring still adheres to the stone, and suggests the warmth and brilliance of Greek relief in the Golden Age.

    "Still more beautiful is The Birth of Aphrodite, carved on one side of the 'Ludovisi Throne' by an unknown sculptor of presumably Ionian training. Two goddesses are raising Aphrodite from the sea, her thin wet garment clings to her form and reveals it in all the splendor of maturity. The head is semi-Asiatic, but the drapery of the attendant deities, and the soft grace of their pose, bear the stamp of the sensitive Greek eye and hand.

    "On another side of the 'throne' a nude girl plays the double flute.

    "On a third side a veiled woman prepares her lamp for the evening. Perhaps the face and garments here are even nearer to perfection than on the central piece."

    Any comment about sculptured reliefs?

    Robby

    georgehd
    May 8, 2003 - 05:43 am
    Re my post 602 - my wife, who is an artist, believes that there is art in nature and does not like my definition of art. Just thought you should know.

    No comment about sculptures reliefs but we should remember that what we know about Greek art comes from what remained of Greek art that has been discovered and talked about. I wonder how much Greek art has been destroyed and that we know nothing of. I was thinking of the looted artifacts from the Iraq museum and the notion that some of them may be lost forever.

    I do not know if any of you have ever looked at books of photographs taken under water. If you find any in a book store, do yourself a favor and look at them. The pictures are absolutely gorgeous. A couple of photographers names to look for - David Doubilet and Christopher Newbert. True beauty in nature.

    As an aside (nothing to do with Greek art) I highly recommend the book South Southeast by Steve McCurry. The books contains photographs of India and are some of the most beautiful I have seen; one can see beauty in abject squalor. McCurry is the man who took the famous photo of the Afghan woman that was on the cover of the Natioinal Geographic some years ago.

    You can go to amazon.com and search for these photographers to see some of their images.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 8, 2003 - 05:52 am
    George:--Maybe your wife would like to participate in Senior Net!!

    Robby

    kiwi lady
    May 8, 2003 - 06:13 am
    George I like Your wife!

    Carolyn

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 8, 2003 - 06:32 am
    "In the fifth century frontality is abandoned. Foreshortening deepens perspctive. Stillness gives place to movement -- rigidity to life. Indeed, when Greek statuary breaks through the old conventions and shows man in action, it is an artistic revolution. Rarely before, in Egypt or the Near East, or in pre-Marathon Greece, has any sculpture in the round been caught in action.

    "These developments owe much to the freshened vitality and buoyancy of Greek life after Salamis, and more to the patient study of motile anatomy by master and apprentice through many generations. 'Is it not by modeling your works on living beings,' asks Sodcrates, sculptor and philosopher, 'that you make your statues appear alive?...And as our different attitudes cause the play of certain muscles of our body, upwards or downwards, so that some are contracted and some stretched, some wrung and some relaxed -- is it not by expressing these efforts that you give greater truth and verisimilitude to your works?"

    "The Periclean sculptor is interested in every feature of the body -- in the abdomen as much as in the face -- in the marvelous play of the elastic flesh over the moving framework of the bones -- in the swelling of muscles, tendons, and veins -- in the endless wonders of the structure and action of hands and ears and feet. He is fascinated by the difficulty of molding the extremities.

    "He does not often use models to pose for him in a studio. For the most part he is content to watch the men stripped and active in the palaestra or on the athletic field, and the women solemnly marching in the religious processions, or naturally absorbed in their domestic tasks. It is for this reason, and not through modesty, that he centers his studies of anatomy upon the male, and in his portraits of women substitutes the refinements of drapery for anatomical detail -- although he makes the drapery as transparent as he dares.

    "Tired of the stiff skirts of Egypt and archaie Greece, he loves to show feminine robes agitated by a breeze, for here again he catches the quality of motion and life."

    The freshened vitality and buoyancy of Greek life carries over into its statuary? Much to talk about here!! Does art, indeed, reflect life?

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 8, 2003 - 07:23 am
    There is color, form, pattern and so forth in nature. What is in nature has inspired artists to do some beautiful and wonderful things. But I cannot call nature "art". Art is something else that human beings have created over centuries and centuries. No god painted those trees, the sea and the sky, or took a chisel and marble and sculpted those mountains and valleys. Painting and sculpting are human things; not the work of some god. That's how I see it. Others may view nature a different and more emotional way.

    Those replications linked by Eloise are interesting. They give me the same feeling I'd have if the Old Man of the Mountain is somehow reconstructed. I want to see the real thing.

    In the form of a question, Bubble said that death is natural and surely must be accepted. How many ordinary ancient Greeks were as philosophical and fearless of death as that? Life in Ancient Greece was based on Life. Rarely has a civilization been so wrapped around that idea. In Ancient Greece gods went to heaven, human beings did not. They did not live for a hereafter; they lived for now.

    Everything in their artwork shows great vitality, even battle scenes. It seems to me that death to them must have been a little shameful -- the wrath of the gods and Fate -- and I would suspect that they feared death as much, if not more, than we do now.

    Two people in my life are very close to dying right now, and it's making me think.

    Mal

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 8, 2003 - 07:26 am
    Is a sunrise or sunset artistic? Are white clouds in the form of sheep against a blue sky artistic? Is a snowflake artistic?

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 8, 2003 - 07:32 am
    According to my dictionary, the word "artistic" means:

    "1. Of or relating to art or artists: the artistic community.
    "2. Sensitive to or appreciative of art or beauty: an artistic temperament.
    "3. Showing imagination and skill: an artistic design."

    So, no, the things you mention, Robby, are not artistic. They are beautiful and wondrous, and often the sight of them moves us, but they are not art. We're talking apples and oranges here.

    Mal

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 8, 2003 - 07:46 am

    Ludovisi Throne, showing the Birth of Aphrodite and other bas reliefs

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 8, 2003 - 07:51 am

    Hellenistic funeral stele

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 8, 2003 - 07:58 am

    Kouros, Archaic style

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 8, 2003 - 08:03 am
    Sculpture Early Classical Period

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 8, 2003 - 08:06 am
    Sculpture Late Classical Period

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 8, 2003 - 08:09 am
    Sculpture Hellenistic Period

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 8, 2003 - 08:26 am
    Dog and the Giant -- Hellenistic period

    Athena and the Giant -- Hellenistic period

    georgehd
    May 8, 2003 - 08:48 am
    Mal's definition of art is more akin to mine. Therefore my wife is incorrect. What else is new? Only kidding.

    Robby, there are so many wonderful things in nature that are beautiful and many have been captured on film. Is any one familiar with the cloud photographs of Alfred Stieglitz? These are amazing and represent one of the first uses of photography to express emotion. Stieglitz was married to Georgia O'Keefe who painted many oils based on natural objects, mostly flower parts. Some of these are quite sensual. My taste in art runs to objects created after about 1880 (Impressionism).

    Mal, your posts of the sculpture of various periods is most interesting as it shows the progression and advance of artistic accomplishment very well. Thanks

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 8, 2003 - 10:08 am
    George mentioned Alfred Stieglitz and Georgia O'Keeffe. Click the links below to see some of their work. The image of the Stieglitz photograph is not good, but you may get the idea.

    Clouds at Lake George, photograph by Alfred Stieglitz

    Canna lily and Blue flower, paintings by Georgia O'Keeffe

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 8, 2003 - 05:58 pm
    A FASCINATING ARTICLE from today's NY Times concerning the obtaining and saving of articles from way back in Sumeria.

    Mal, you may be able to bring up photos of some of the artifacts mentioned in the article.

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 8, 2003 - 06:32 pm

    Bull's head on a harp -- Sumerian

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 8, 2003 - 06:38 pm

    Art of Sumer

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 8, 2003 - 06:44 pm

    Look what I just ran into from the Museum at Baghdad.

    Bull's Head from the Lyre. Museum at Baghdad

    Justin
    May 8, 2003 - 07:08 pm
    I agree with Mal and George. Art is man made.There are random designs in nature that result in recognizable patterns but it is the application of a human mind to these patterns that make them art. Man puts two twigs together in the shape of a cross. That's art. Nature puts two twigs together in the shape of a cross. That's a random accident. One can find artistic shapes in nature, geometric patterns in snow flakes, for example, but no one did anything to the snow flake to give it that shape. The shape was simply a random result of the molecular structure of ice crystals moving through the atmosphere. A snow man is art. A snow flake is a random design. Picasso once took bicycle handle bars and a bicycle seat and put them together to create an art object. Duchamp says, "art is what I say it is." It is man who makes art.

    kiwi lady
    May 8, 2003 - 09:26 pm
    Justin whatever the experts say I will continue to see works of art all around me!

    Carolyn

    kiwi lady
    May 8, 2003 - 09:27 pm
    PS Mal I liked the two links you put up - the house and mountain with the clouds and the canna lily etc. Really nice.

    Carolyn

    Justin
    May 8, 2003 - 09:46 pm
    Carolyn: There is room for all points of view in this discussion and I will defend your right to see art in any thing you choose. Only Webster knows what art is and I am not always sure about him.

    Justin
    May 8, 2003 - 09:59 pm
    The appearance of foreshortening which improves perception, the decline of frontality, and the beginning of movement in sculpture, are the first steps away from the idealistic forms we found in the early Pericles period. In the previous century figures like the Critias Boy dominated Greek sculpture. When Myron appeared he brought us works like the Discus Thrower which emphasized movement and pointed the way to the more realistic forms we will see in the Hellenistic period.

    Justin
    May 8, 2003 - 11:24 pm
    Robby: something strange is happening when I select the "Post" icon. The message does not appear immediately. I must leave Senior net and come back in to see the posting. Perhaps it would be well for one of the technicians to look at the problem. I don't know what others are experiencing.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 9, 2003 - 03:58 am
    Justin:--Click onto "Index" above -- go into "Computer Questions" and maybe someone there can answer you. I don't seem to have that problem.

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 9, 2003 - 04:13 am
    "The subjects of the Greek sculptor must all be physically admirable. He has no use for weaklings, for intellectuals, for abnormal types, or for old women or men. He does well with the horse, but indifferently with other animals. He does better with women, and some of his anonymous masterpieces, like the meditative young lady holding her robe on her breast in the Athens Museum, achieve a quiet loveliness that does not lend itself to words.

    "He is at his best with athletes, for these he admires without stint, and can observe without hindrance. Now and then he exaggerates their prowess, and crosses their abdomen with incredible muscles. But despite this fault he can cast bronzes like that found in the sea near Anticythera, and alternatively named an Ephebos, or a Perseus whose hand once held Medusa's snake-haired head.

    "Sometimes he catches a youth or a girl absorbed in some simple and spontaneous action, like the boy drawing a thorn from his foot. But his country's mythology is still the leading inspiration of his art.

    "That terrible conflict between philosophy and religion which runs through the thought of the fifth century does not show yet on the monuments. Here the gods are still supreme. If they are dying, they are nobly transmuted into the poetry of art. Does the sculptor who shapes in bronze the powerful Zeus of Artemisium really believe that he is modeling the Law of the World?

    Does the artist who carves the gentle and sorrowful Dionysus of the Delphi Museum know, in the depths of his inarticulate understanding, that Dionysus has been shot down by the arows of philosophy, and that the traditional features of Dionysus' successor, Christ, are already previsioned in his head?"

    In the conflict between philosophy and religion, religion (at least in this period) appears to be supreme in the artistic endeavors. Any comments?

    Robby

    Éloïse De Pelteau
    May 9, 2003 - 05:44 am
    When I look at artwork I let my gut feeling tell me if it is beautiful. Harmony and enthusiasm guide me. Art has to elevate my spirit and if some people find flaws in something I like, then that could be the very element why it is beautiful to me.

    The geographical location in Ancient Greece permitted artist to perfect their talents not being engaged in the daily struggle of survival. Climate was ideal, not too cold or too hot. Whitewashed dwellings were adorned according to their fortune, but even the modest ones had graceful arches. With beautiful nature surrounding them, Greeks took that for granted and felt that their artistic creativity had to be expressed in some substantial way.

    When people say, "this is a beautiful car", I never find beauty in it, for me a car is scrap metal on 4 wheels, and be it a BMW or a Ferrari. That is why I have to think when someone asks what is the make of my car. I find no beauty in that, just transportation.

    Art is beauty expressed in the way an artist sees it and others might not see the same beauty in it. We are all different even in that. Balance is necessary for beauty.

    Eloïse

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 9, 2003 - 06:37 am

    Everyone looks at art differently. Reactions to visual art are based on our lives and various experiences we've had. I do not ask anything of art, and consider it a happy accident if it elevates me. Balance in art is necessary to create beauty for some viewers, and not for others.

    Unlike Eloise, I see beauty in the design and engineering of some cars. I also see beauty sometimes in the painting which goes on cereal boxes and everything else that we buy in the supermarket. I've said this in another of Robby's discussions. We are surrounded, if not bombarded, by visual art, so much so that we don't see it half the time.

    There are some commercials on television which I consider quite beautiful. Scenes in movies and on the stage can be very artistically done, so can pages we see on the World Wide Web through the means of our computers.

    It has been my aim for more than six years to create beauty in the web pages I build. Most recently I have been designing and making web page backgrounds and computer paintings using the mouse. Some of them are beautiful; some are not. Visual art is not just oil on canvas, or watercolor paint on paper, or tempera on wet plaster walls and sculptures.

    Mal

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 9, 2003 - 08:33 am
    There has been much religion depicted in art for centuries. There follow some links to images of religious art of different eras.

    Religion in art, India

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 9, 2003 - 08:34 am

    Religion in art, Medieval

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 9, 2003 - 08:36 am

    Religion in art, Medieval

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 9, 2003 - 08:37 am

    Religion in art, Renaissance

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 9, 2003 - 08:39 am

    Religion in art, 20th Century. This painting is by Dali

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 9, 2003 - 09:06 am
    Religion in art, 20th Century. This painting is "Rabbi" by Marc Chagall

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 9, 2003 - 09:12 am

    This is a link to thumbnail pictures of bas reliefs and sculptures at the Delphi Museum, some of which depict gods. Click the small image to access a larger one.

    Delphi Museum

    Éloïse De Pelteau
    May 9, 2003 - 11:33 am
    Those last 7 links are beautiful Mal. So is the artwork you do in the Sonata Magazine. You are very talented in every form of art.

    I feel that people usually try to balance their lives in activities that satisfy them. Finding the right balance is the difficult part. When we reach that right balance, life has taken its toll.

    Eloïse

    georgehd
    May 9, 2003 - 12:37 pm
    I am now in the States and have limited access to the site. But just for the record, and most importantly in this discussion - a Jaguar is a beautiful car!!

    Why must religion and philosophy be in conflict? I find this a most intriging question and hope that Robby will allow some time for discussion. If and when I organize my thoughts I will try to post them.

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 9, 2003 - 01:42 pm

    Thanks, Eloise, though I didn't have anything to do with the talent. It's in the genes I carry around. There are as artistic pages in the WREX Magazine and the m.e.stubbs poetry journal as there are in Sonata magazine for the arts.

    Thank you beforehand, Robby, for letting me plug my ezines here. Since I made six of those seven web pages I linked here this morning, I figure it's okay.

    Mal

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 9, 2003 - 01:56 pm

    Welcome to the States, George. Though I haven't read that far in Life of Greece, I can think of numerous ways religion and philosophy can be in conflict. With the advent of "Thou shalt nots", certain freedoms of thought by philosophers (and artists) were very restricted.

    Mal

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 9, 2003 - 02:54 pm

    Statue of boy drawing a thorn from his foot

    Justin
    May 9, 2003 - 03:21 pm
    The philosopher searches for truth. The religious thinks he has found the truth. One deals in beliefs the other in knowledge. One of the jobs of philosophy is that of critically examining the grounds for fundemental belief. That assignment alone puts the philosopher in conflict with religion. When philosophy questions the usefulness and truthfulness of the grounds for religious belief, the questioner comes up short. The examination is seen, more often than not, as an attack on religious belief and that engenders conflict. The twain will never blend for its ends are opposed.

    Justin
    May 9, 2003 - 04:02 pm
    Beauty is all around us. Unfortunately, beauty is often ignored, sometimes because it is unexpected in ordinary places. The banal rarely tempts one to look for beauty in design. Yet, it is in the commonplace where we live and work that beauty is often resident.

    Carolyn points to nature and sees beauty in its formations.George sees beauty in a Jaguar and so he should for the Jag designers have beauty in mind and Mal finds beauty in engineering results. Beauty is all around us. We have only to look. It is in the flower. It is in the smooth functioning of a compression engine. It is in the conversational language we use in this discussion and it is in the people whom we see and talk with everyday.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 9, 2003 - 05:54 pm
    Durant moves us on:--

    "Each sculptor had his place in a long lineage of masters and pupils carrying on the skills of their art -- checking the extravagances of independent individualities -- encouraging their specific abilities -- disciplining them with a sturdy grounding in the technology and achievements of the past -- and forming them, through this interplay of talent and law, into a greater art than often comes to genius isolated and unruled. Though rebels are the necessary variants in the natural history of art, it is only when their new line has been steadied with heredity and chastened with time that it generates supreme personalities.

    "Five schools performed this function -- those of Rhegium, Sicyon, Argos, Aegina, and Attica. About 496 another Pythagoras of Samos settled at Rhegium, cast a Philoctetes that won him Mediterranean fame, and put into the faces of his statues such signs of passion, pain, and age as shocked all Greek sculptors until those of the Hellenistic period decided to imitate him. At Sicyon Canachus and his brother Aristocles carried on the work begun a century earlier by Dipoenus and Scyllis of Crete. Callon and Onatas brought distinction to Aegina by their skill with bronze. Perhaps it was they who made the Aegina pediments.

    "At Argos Ageladas organized th3e transmission of sculptural technique in a school that reached its apex in Polycleitus."

    I am wondering if we have today anything equivalent to the schools of sculpture of that era?

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 10, 2003 - 05:12 am

    I found this, and thought it was interesting.

    Ancient Greece, Chronology of Events

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 10, 2003 - 05:40 am
    I can’t find much about the schools. Here are a few sculptures. First the female figure.

    Aphrodite of Melos

    Old Market Woman

    Aphrodite of Doidalas

    Aphrodite and Pan

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 10, 2003 - 05:52 am
    Sculpture is not dead! Here is a LIST of current schools that teach sculpture.

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 10, 2003 - 05:57 am
    Satyr with infant Dionysius

    Boy and Goose

    Orpheus and the Animals

    The Lizard Killer, Roman copy of a Praxiteles sculpture

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 10, 2003 - 06:08 am

    Who said sculpture was dead?

    My daughter studied sculpture at Lacoste, France under the auspices of Sarah Lawrence College in Westchester County, New York which she attended in the late 70's. She later studied sculpture at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, NC where she received her B.F.A. in the 90's.

    Below is a sculpture Dorian carved from a standing dead tree in the front yard of a former professor of medicine at UNC in Chapel Hill When he and his wife moved to another house, they cut down the sculpture and moved it, too.

    Sculpture by Dorian Freeman Smith

    georgehd
    May 10, 2003 - 06:14 am
    Justin, thank you for the posts on philosphy and religion.

    I am on the board of the Maryland Institute College of Art, considered one of the finest art schools in the country. (That is why I am in the states). We have long had a fine sculpture department though the degree offered is one in Fine Arts and not sculpture specifically. I am not sure why we were not on Robby's list.

    I do not think that you find schools of art (sculpture)in the sense that they existed in Greek times or well after that. Our art colleges are more eclectic and no one style of art is followed. Students are usually encouraged to listen to their own artistic voice. More and more, we see blurring between art media so that at MICA we divide our program into two dimensional and three dimensional art as well as digital art. Almost all students today include digital imagery in their program no matter what their major. There is a machine that allows a student to design a sculpture or any three dimensional object on the computer and then that design is actually created as a three dimensional object by the machine using a kind of plaster dust which is sprayed through nozzels, very much the way a dot matrix printer works. It is an amazing process to watch.

    Some graduate students choose the institution to attend because of a specific department or artist (teacher); I see that as the closest similarity to the ancient Greek schools.

    Yesterday, I attended Grandparents Day at the school where I taught for many years and where three of my grandcrildren attend. We were treated to wonderful examples of art created by students in grades K-12 and then went on a tour of a new arts building under construction. The concept of this building is absolutely amazing - a far cry from the way art was handled when we were in school. Art includes the usual visual arts as well as dance and music. The hope is that there will be greater interaction between the teachers of the various art courses and that students will connect what they are doing in one medium with programs in another medium.

    High schools in the US are producing graduates of increasing competence in the arts and this can be seen in the portfolios submitted for admission to art college. It is unfortunate, however, that many public school districts do not see the value of the arts and tend to cut the art budget or even eliminate the art program.

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 10, 2003 - 06:51 am

    I forgot to say that the doctor for whom my daughter made the sculpture is legally blind. When he commissioned Dorian to do it, he told her he wanted something he could "see" with his hands.

    Mal

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 10, 2003 - 10:39 am
    Mal:--Your daughter's sculpture is FANTASTIC!! And, as you indicated, can be enjoyed by two senses.

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 10, 2003 - 10:54 am

    Thank you, Robby. I'll tell Dorian you like it. She calls it "The Weight of the World."

    Mal

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 10, 2003 - 10:57 am
    "Coming from Sicyon, Polycleitus made himself popular in Argos by designing for its temple of Hera, about 412, a gold and ivory statue of the matron goddess, which the age ranked second only to the chryselephantine immensities of Pheidias.

    "At Ephesus he joined in a competition with Pheidias, Cresilas, and Phradmon to make an Amazon for the temple of Artemis. The four artists were made judges of the result. Each, the story goes, named his own work best, Polycleitus' second best. The prize was given to the Sicyonian.

    "But Polycleitus loved ahtletes more than women or gods. In the famous Diadumenos (of which the best surviving copy is in the Athens museum) he chose for representation that moment in which the victor binds about his head the fillet over which the judges are to place the laurel wreath. The chest and abdomen are too muscular for belief, but the body is vividly posed upon one foot, and the features are a definition of classic regularity.

    "Regularity was the fetish of Polycleitus. It was his life aim to find and establish a canon or rule for the correct proportion of every part in a statue. He was the Pythagoras of sculpture, seeking a divine mathematics of symmetry and form. The dimensions of any part of a perfect body, he thought, should bear a given ratio to the dimensions of any one part, say the index finger. The Polycleitan canon called for a round head, broad shoulders, stocky torso, wide hips, and short legs, making all in all a figure rather of strength than of grace.

    "The sculptor was so fond of his canon that he wrote a treatise to expound it, and molded a statue to illustrate it. Probably this was the Coryphoros, or Spear Bearer, of which the Naples Museum has a Roman copy. Here again is the brachycephalic head, the powerful shoulders, the short trunk, the corrugated musculature overflowing the groin.

    "Lovelier is the Westmacott Ephebos of the British museum, where the lad has feelings as well as muscles, and seems lost in a gentle meditation on somethng else than his own strength.

    "Through these figures the canon of Polycleitus became for a time a law to the sculptors of the Peloponnesus. It influenced even Pheidas, and ruled until Praxiteles overthrew it with that rival canon of tall, slim elegance which survived through Rome into the statuary of Christian Europe."

    Four "impartial" artists judging their own work. Interesting!

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 10, 2003 - 04:20 pm

    Polykleitos, Diadumenos

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 10, 2003 - 04:22 pm

    Polykleitos, Doryphoros

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 10, 2003 - 04:25 pm

    Polykleitos, Wounded Amazon

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 10, 2003 - 04:57 pm
    "Myron mediated between the Peloponnesian and the Attic schools. Born at Eleutherae, living at Athens, and (says Pliny) studying for a while with Ageladas, he learned to unite Peloponnesian masculinity with Ionian grace.

    "What he added to all the schools was motion. He saw the athlete not, like Polycleitus, before or after the contest, but in it. He realized his vision so well in bronze that no other sculptor in history has rivaled him in portraying the male body in action.

    "About 470 he cast the most famous of athletic statues -- the Discobolos or Discus Thrower. The wonder of the male frame is here complete -- the body carefully studied in all those movements of muscle, tendon, and bone that are involved in the action -- the legs and arms and trunk bent to give the fullest force to the throw -- the face not distorted with effort, but calm in the confidence of ability -- the head not heavy or brutal, but that of a man of blood and refinement, who could write books if he would condescend."

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 10, 2003 - 05:55 pm

    Discobolos

    Justin
    May 10, 2003 - 10:27 pm
    George; It's not necessary to thank me for a posting. I thought you wanted to discuss the relationship of religion to philosophy so I gave you something to shoot at. We've been discussing that topic for the last year or so. We're discussing fifth and fourth century Greek sculpture at the moment. I am happy you are posting and will try to accomodate your inclinations, if Robby will allow it.

    It's nice that you are able to continue to be of value to your school even though you have retired. Robby, at eighty-one, working as he does, is an inspiration to us all. I try to raise money for my university but do little else and I often think I should do more.

    I am pleased that you have finally been able to acquire the book and I look forward to discussing the many interesting facets of Greek life with you.

    Justin
    May 10, 2003 - 11:06 pm
    It is useful to compare The Discobolus with the Charioteer from the previous century. Both works represent atletic motion yet the Charioteer is almost immobile while the Discus Thrower is caught in mid-stride. The Charioteer is depicted as stationary in an activity we know requires much motion while the Discus Thrower is stopped in the process of throwing. The gown of the Charioteer shows no movement. The Discus Thrower is clearly in action. This is a good example of the shift away from idealism and toward realism.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 11, 2003 - 04:04 am
    Durant now moves us on to what he terms --

    The Builders

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 11, 2003 - 04:18 am
    "Among all the Greek temples built in the prosperous fifth century only a few Ionic shrines survive, chiefly the Erechtheum and the temple of Nike Aptertos on the Acropolis. Attica remained faithful to Doric, yielding to the Ionic order only so far as to use it for the inner columns of the Proplaea, and to place a frieze around the Theseum and the Parthenon. Perhaps a tendency to make the Doric column longer and slenderer reveals a further influence of the Ionic style.

    "In Asia Minor the Greeks imbibed the Oriental love of delicate ornament, and expressed it in the complex elaboration of the Ionic entablature, and the creation of a new and more ornate order, the Corinthinian.

    "About 430 (as Vitruvius tells the tale) an Ionia sculptor, Callimachus, was struck by the sight of a basket of votive offerings, covered with a tile, which a nurse had left upon the tomb of her mistress. A wild acanthus had grown around the basket and the tile. The sculptor, pleased with the natural form so suggested, modified the Ionic capitals of a temple that he was building at Corinth, by mingling acanthus leaves with the volutes. Probably the story is a myth, and the nurse's basket had less influence than the palm and papyrus capitals of Egypt in generating the Corinthian style.

    "The new order made little headway in classic Greece. Ictinus used it for one isolated column in the court of an Ionic temple at Phigalea, and towards the end of the fourth century it was used for the choragic monument of Lysicrates. Only under the elegant Romans of the Empire did this delicate style reach its full development."

    Laymen such as myself will need "experts" here to explain the above in simpler terms and look forward to links that will place this architecture before our very eyes. More and more I am coming to realize that Greece was a sort of bridge between the Eastern culture (which we have been examining) and the Western culture (which we will examine in the not too distant future.)

    Robby

    Éloïse De Pelteau
    May 11, 2003 - 05:05 am
    Choragic Monument of Lysicrates"


    "The Lysicrates monument owes its preservation to the French Capuchin monks who bought it in 1669, and incorporated it in their monastery." Interesting

    Eloïse

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 11, 2003 - 05:10 am
    Thank you, Eloise, for that "early morning" response and an excellent link. It must be thrilling to walk along "Lysicrates Street" in Athens and look at a monument that has stood there for 2,500 years!

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 11, 2003 - 05:19 am
    As I walk around the cities of America and look at all the monuments dedicated to wars, generals in wars, dead soldiers, famous battles, and the like, I look in vain for monuments erected to winners in chorus and dance contests.

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 11, 2003 - 05:42 am
    Click HERE for ALL you ever wanted to know about architecture (if not more).

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 11, 2003 - 05:53 am

    Dancers by George Segal 1971. Bronze with white patina

    Éloïse De Pelteau
    May 11, 2003 - 06:16 am
    Why go to University when we have right here excellent Professors in History, Art, and other disciplines as participants who transmit their eclectic knowledge to others who didn't have the chance to study in a classroom, but are still curious about what makes the world turn.

    I guess I go just to socialize with my peer group.

    Eloïse

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 11, 2003 - 07:12 am

    Carytids, Erechtheum

    Nike Apteros



    Parthenon

    georgehd
    May 11, 2003 - 08:06 am
    Here are some good links to Greek architecture.

    http://eghs.dist214.k12.il.us/html/academics/english/humanities/grkcol.html

    http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/fnart/arch/greek_arch.html

    Here is a link to a 4th grade study of Ancient Greece. Pretty impressive. Find another link History for Kids that goes even further.

    http://www.arlington.k12.ma.us/AncientGreece/Default.htm

    Bubble
    May 11, 2003 - 08:24 am
    I am very patial to that Greek alphabet as in the second link here: The cursive lends itself to such lovely calligraphy.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 11, 2003 - 08:29 am
    I am so pleased that in some schools 4th graders (approx 10 years old) are learning what our ancient ancestors did.

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 11, 2003 - 09:04 am
    "In this period cities almost bankrupted themselves in rivalry to have the fairest statuary and the larget shrines. To her massive sixth-century edifices at Samos and Epheus Ionia added new Ionic temples at Magnesia, Teos, and Priene. At Assus in the Troad Greek colonists raised an almost archaic Doric fane to Athens. At the other end of Hellas Crotona built, about 480, a vast Doric home for Hera. It survived until 1600 when a bishop thought he could make better use of its stones.

    "To the fifth century belong the greatest of the temples at Poseidonia (Paestum), Segesta, Selinus, and Acragas, and the temple of Aselepius at Epidaurus. At Syracuse the columns still stand of a temple raised to Athena by Gelon I, and partly preserved by its transformation into a Christian church.

    At Bassae, near Phigalea in the Peloponnesus, Ictinus designed a temple of Apollo strangely different from his other masterpiece, the Parthenon. Here the Doric periptery enclosed a space occupied by a small naos and a large open court surrounded by an Ionic colonnade. Around the interior of this court, along the inner face of the Ionic columns, ran a frieze almost as graceful as the Parthenon's, and having the added virtue of beng visible."

    I knew of the Parthenon, of course, but had no idea that there were so many temples scattered around in the world of Ancient Greece.

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 11, 2003 - 09:34 am

    Ionic Architecture. Scroll down to see Ictinus Temple of Apollo

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 12, 2003 - 04:44 am
    A reminder to everyone to regularly read the changes in the GREEN quotes as you scroll down through the Heading.

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 12, 2003 - 04:54 am
    "In Attica the Doric style, which tends elsewhere to a bulging corpulence, takes on Ionian grace and elegance. Color is added to line, ornament to symmetry.

    On a dangerous headland at Sunium those who risked the sea raised to Poseidon a shrine of which eleven columns stand.

    "At Eleusis Ictinus designed a spacious temple to Demeter, and under Pericles' persuasion Athens contributed funds to make this edifice worthy of the Eleusinian festival.

    "At Athens the proximity of good marble on Mt. Pentelicus and in Paros encouraged the artist with the finest of building materials. Seldom, until our periods of economic breakdown, has a democracy been able or willing to spend so lavishly on public construction.

    "The Parthenon cost seven hundred talents ($4,200,000). The Athene Parthenos (which, however, was a gold reserve as well as a statue) cost $6,000,000. The unfinished Propylaea, $2,400,000 -- minor Periclean structures at Athens and the Piraeus, $18,000,000 -- sculpture and other decoration, $16,200,000 -- altogether, in the sixteen years from 447 to 431, the city of Athens voted $57,600,000 for public buildings, statuary, and painting.

    "The spread of this sum among artisans and artists, executives and slaves, had much to do with the prosperity of Athens under Pericles."

    Do you folks think that our democracies are able to spend "so lavishly on public construction?" Are they willing? Should it be done on such a grand scale?

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 12, 2003 - 06:30 am

    I found the interesting article below while I was searching for pages about poverty in Ancient Athens. It's not about architecture, but it is about the culture of Athenian Greeks.

    Archeological find 1998

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 12, 2003 - 06:44 am

    Didn't the Ancient Athenians think that art and architecture were to be publicly used? If so, there was a reason for spending all of this money on construction.

    I often remember the comment of a European friend of mine after he saw Washington, DC for the first time. His comment was that it is a graveyard full of monuments to the dead. Do we really worship our ancestors so much?

    Every time I hear of large government expenditures for construction of buildings, such as what the Ancient Greeks built, or money spent on jaunts by high officials, I think of the economy of our country and the poor, and wonder if the money might better be spent on public health and welfare. This is why I was doing a search on poverty in Ancient Athens. Does anyone know about this?

    Surely there were people who were not slaves that could not reap benefits from working on construction or making statues. Were there public residences for people who could not own their own homes? Was there public assistance for the elderly and infirm? What was the system for health care in Athens at that time, I wonder?

    Mal

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 12, 2003 - 06:45 am
    A link worth reading in detail, Mal, as it causes us to pause and think about our own "democracy."

    Robby

    Bubble
    May 12, 2003 - 11:17 am
    A bit of trivia:



    SPIKEY SOLES

    In ancient Greece, courtesans wore sandals with nails studded into the sole so that their footprints would leave the message "Follow me".

    Éloïse De Pelteau
    May 12, 2003 - 02:29 pm
    MONTREAL'S OLYMPIC STADIUM


    Although half of Montrealers complain about still paying for this monument built in 1979 in Honor of sports, I think that it represents one of the finest architectural achievements I have ever seen elsewhere.

    I love its graceful oval design and its leaning tower over the roof.

    The original retractable roof is now permanent because the French Architect responsible for the plans did not take into enough consideration our extremely harsh winters with snow and ice accumulation.

    All of the images in the link are about less than one hour of where I live and I often visit the Botanical Gardens adjacent to the Olympic Stadium where I sometimes go and spend the day.

    Clicking on one of the images, there are lovely views and maps of the city of Montreal, the streets, the metro, the layout of the city, the streets surrounding my house.

    Montreal is now ready for its beautiful summer and I enjoy it to the fullest every year. I love my city.

    Eloïse

    Justin
    May 12, 2003 - 02:31 pm
    Robby: The view that Greece acts as a mixing ground and transfer agent for eastern and western ideas is one I can fully agree with. I see the Greek as a receiver, blender, and transmitter of the ideas of east and west. This view will become more and more pronounced as the story moves closer and closer to western Rome.

    There is early evidence in the changes we are seeing in Greek architecture. Consider the change in capitals.

    We met the Doric order first. Its columns are thick and the capitals are simple. They are formed like a plate on a stick. The plate is called a capital (echinus). It is wide to accomodate the ends of two rectangular stones which connect two adjacent columns. The ends of these stones are secured in place by triglyphs, which are placed above.The triglyphs are the ends of what a modern house builder calls Joists. It is the capital that takes the full weight of the entablature. It holds the roof up.

    The Athenians made many adjustments over time to account for optical illusions. But even though there is a serious mathematical problem in the Doric order, and a capital system called Ionic available from the eastern shores, the Athenians continued to use the Doric system. There are few examples of the Ionic order on the mainland.

    The Ionic order is based on a slender column and the capital is more decorative. It is splayed out in volutes or spirals. The system, because of its slender columns and a variety of other modifications, is able to carry the weight of the entablature without the mathematical problem and without many of the optical illusions. It's a better system.

    The Corinthian order is a variation of the Ionic. It merely introduces a more decorative capital using acanthus leaves instead of volutes. Acanthus leaves were used on capitals of Egyptian buildings. Ships coming from Egypt passed through the Corinth canal and ideas from Egypt came with the seamen. The Corinthian order was used very little in Greece. Rome adopted this capital and used it extensively throughout the world.

    The corinthian capital is a clear example of Greek design influenced by eastern ideas which were transmitted to the west by Greece. It is visible evidence of our oriental heritage. It is one we can readily see today in many US federal buildings.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 12, 2003 - 05:02 pm
    Your Stadium is beautiful, Eloise. I find it hard to believe that there are people who don't like it.

    Robby

    Justin
    May 12, 2003 - 09:16 pm
    Advances in design in the US have been the result of private capital rather than public funds. The International style and the work of Frank Lloyd Wright are commercial designs. The Johnson's Wax building, the Lever Bros. building and similar designs were bought and paid for by private money rather than tax dollars.

    In a free enterprise based democracy that result is not unexpected. Our government has political trouble supporting the arts. NEA is not a favorite money basket for politicians. The National Gallery was done by I.M.Pei but he had so many restrictions on his budget that he was unable to give free rein to his talent.

    Justin
    May 12, 2003 - 11:32 pm
    When the Parthenon had been built, Pericles and Phidias decided it would be dedicated to Athena Parthenos. The priests devoted to Athena objected. Athena had been resident in another temple so it was thought that moving her would be sacrilegious. They predicted a disastrous future for Athens if the transfer were made.

    Pericles prevailed and the Peloponesian War followed in which Athens was defeated. Further, the building was attacked in war after war. The Turks, in later centuries, stored amunition in the building. The ammo was exploded and the building torn apart.

    Still later, Lord Elgin, fearful that the metopes and frieze would be destroyed, removed them and stored them in the British Museum. The Greeks have been trying to get them back but the Brits won't release them because the Greeks do not, even today, exhibit care in the preservation of their historic treasures.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 13, 2003 - 03:33 am
    "The Athenians, on their return from Salamis, found their city almost wholly devastated by the Persian occupation. Every edifice of any value had been burned to the ground. Such a calamity when it does not destroy the citizens as well as the city, makes them stronger. The 'act of God' clears away many eyesores and unfit habitations. Chance accomplishes what human obstinacy would never allow. If food can be found through the crisis, the labor and genius of men create a finer city than before.

    "The Athenians, even after the war with Persia, were rich in both labor and genius, and the spirit of victory doubled their will for great enterprise. In a generation Athens was rebuilt. A new council chamber rose, a new prytaneum, new homes, new porticoes, new walls of defense, new wharves and warehouses at a new port.

    "About 446 Hippodamus of Miletus, chief town-planner of anitquity, laid out a new Piraeus, and set a new style, by replacing the old chaos of haphazard and winding alleys with broad, straight streets crossing at right angles. On an elevation a mile northwest of the Acropolis unknown artists raised that smaller Parthenon known as the Theseum, or temple of Theseus.

    "Sculptors filled the pediments with statuary and the metopes with reliefs, and ran a frieze above the inner columns at both ends. Painters colored the moldings, the triglyphs, metopes, and frieze, and made bright murals for an interior dimly lit by light shining through marble tiles."

    All this makes me think of the World Trade Center and wondering what sort of architecture will replace it.

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 13, 2003 - 06:14 am

    Below is a link to a small picture of a model of the Libeskind design for the new World Trade Center buildings. It is not the one I would have chosen.

    World Trade Center buildings model

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 13, 2003 - 06:19 am

    More pictures of the design

    Éloïse De Pelteau
    May 13, 2003 - 06:59 am
    Mal, I think that the new WTC plan in your link reflects well the character of New York City. Daring yet elegant. This plan is better designed to blend with the architecture of the other buildings surrounding it than the old one.

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 13, 2003 - 07:15 am

    There were two other designs I liked better, Eloise. One had plans for a larger grassy park which I thought was a better memorial for those who died in the September 11, 2001 tragedy than this design is.

    Mal

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 13, 2003 - 10:50 am
    "The Ancient Financial World"

    "The most important lesson learned from the emergence of finance in ancient Mesopotamia and Greece is that financial instruments from their very inception could be tools of both enterprise and control. At their best they expanded the realm of Mesopotamian contacts and trade to distant shores of Dilmun, and undoubtedly to Africa and India. They allowed Greek shipping to flourish throughout the Mediterranean. At its worst finance became an institutional tool used by the government to extract taxes and rents from its citizenry, and a way for a group of entrepreneurs to exploit the working class mired in debt. We saw that, at times, the techniques of finance could be turned on the government itself. The power of financial technology worried kings and irritated philosophers. Individuals like Dumuzi-gamil, Ea-nasir, Sogdanus, Pasion or even the roguesh philosopher Thales who had a plan or vision for the future could use financial contracts to profit from that plan. Borrowing multiplied the temporary financial power of the individual, and allowed him or her great feats of economic strength. This strength at times challenged the power of the state itself, the power of human compassion, and even the power of moral reason.



    "Finance is not like other technologies. It is not something that, once discovered, becomes a permanent cultural fixture. From the very beginning, governments saw it as both good and evil, and alternately supported and suppressed it. Finance may thrive on stability, but it is threatened by situations in flux. Throughout human history, financial instruments have frequently been re-invented as a way to solve certain human problems. In the centuries since the era of the Mesopotamian and Greek financiers, the financial world has become increasingly complex, but the fundamental principles and tools they discovered several millennia ago have remained the root of all investment contracts. In all likelihood, we must thank an ancient Uruk accountant for the discovery of the time value of money -- and we must also not forget to thank the generations of financiers that followed in his wake for the ingenious means to exploit it."

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 13, 2003 - 10:55 am

    "The Empire"

    "Before the peace with Sparta, Athens benefitted from the taxes paid into the League and began growing quite wealty; after the peace, the Athenians moved the treasury to Athens and began keeping one sixtieth of all the revenue. The Athenians began to grew especially wealthy. The League, after all, was no longer at war with Persia, but the tribute money kept rolling in. At this stage, when the League had lost its military justification and when the tribute money was no longer really going for defense, the League in reality had become an Athenian empire. Reaction among the tribute states was mixed; some city-states eagerly participated in the empire, but most fumed under the onerousness of Athenian control and taxation. As Athens grew more and more powerful and the city more opulent, discontent grew among the tribute states. However, the Spartans, in particular, grew increasingly distrustfull of Athenian power and wealth. They had agreed to recognize the Athenian Empire in exchange for Athens giving up claims to continental territories; however, it was becoming apparent that even without the continental territory, the Athenians were a major threat to Sparta and its influence."
    CLICK HERE FOR MORE

    3kings
    May 13, 2003 - 12:06 pm
    JUSTIN expresses a very prevalent opinion that Art, Architecture etc. is better if financed from Private sources, rather than from Public ones. He suggests that the work of Frank Lloyd Wright would have been poorer had he been financed from the 'Public' funds rather than the 'Private'.

    This thinking has always perplexed me. Would the US army, for instance, be a better fighting force, if financed by some private owner, than the State? Would the Statue of Liberty be a more impressive and loved monument, had it been financed by French individuals, rather than the French tax payer?--- Trevor

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 13, 2003 - 01:26 pm

    As long as the State or the person or group that privately commission artworks keep their unartistic noses out of the project and don't tell the artist what to do and how to do it, artists don't care where the money comes from. Artists want to create and build. Money makes this possible.

    Mal

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 13, 2003 - 05:47 pm
    "The most important lesson learned from the emergence of finance in ancient Mesopotamia and Greece is that financial instruments from their very inception could be tools of both enterprise and control."

    This excerpt from Mal's link causes me to wonder why this instrument which is apparently so important in the development of civilization is so thoroughly misunderstood and often ignored by the "average citizen." How knowledgeable are most of us in the subjects of finance and economics?

    While most of us know about George Washington's bitter winter at Valley Forge, how many of us know the intimate details of the financiers "back home" who were trying to feed and clothe the soldiers? While we know the romantic story of the envisioning and creation of our nation's capital and the building of the White House, the Capitol, and the Washington Monument, how many of us know the money transactions which enabled it to come into being?

    As best as I can see, we know only of the architects and the sculptors.

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 13, 2003 - 06:36 pm
    "Themistocles began the reconstruction of the Acropolis, and planned a temple one hundred feet long, known therefore as the Hecatompedon. After his fall the work was abandoned. The oligarchic party opposed it on the ground tht any dwelling for Athens, if it was not to bring bad luck to Athens, must be built upon the site of the old temple of Athene Polias (i.e. Athena of the City), which the Persians had destroyed.

    "Pericles, caring nothing about superstitions, adopted the site of the Hecatompedon for the Parthenon, and, although the priests protested to the end, went on with his plans. On the southwestern slope of the Acropolis his artists erected an Odeum, or Music Hall, unique in Athens for its cone-shaped dome.

    "It offered a handle to conservative satirists, who thenceforth referred to Pericles' conical head as his odeion, or hall of song. The Odeum was built for the most part of wood, and soon succumbed to time. In this auditorium musical performances were presented, and the Dionysian dramas were rehearsed. There, annually, were held the contests instituted by Pericles in vocal and instrumental music.

    "The versatile statesman himself often acted as a judge in these competitions."

    Your comments, please?

    Robby

    Justin
    May 13, 2003 - 10:44 pm
    One thing is clear, the monument portion of the new WTB better be worthy of the heros who responded to the tragedy, the people who died and their grieving families, and the millions of people who will come to mourn and gape. I have not seen the proposals for the monument yet. In one sense, the entire project is a monument to the recovery powers of New Yorkers and particularly, those who will work in the new buildings. I liked the idea of a park.Manhattan needs parks especially, south of Chambers street. Concrete can be overpowering, leaving pedestrians feeling small and unwelcome. I love New York (It was my home for many years) but at noontime the hot cement makes an unpleasant seat.

    Justin
    May 13, 2003 - 11:00 pm
    When an architect thinks of a design to fit a five million dollar budget and the legislators approve an appropriation for one million dollars, the design suffers or the project is discarded in favor of an alternative. Negotiation between government agencies and artists is most often settled in favor of the government and against the artist.

    Some city governments, upon issuance of permits for private buildings, have recently insisted on the inclusion of space for art works. I think measures of this kind have tended to beautify cities and to provide some respite for the pedestrians in search of relaxation. The Greeks had it all over us in this area of life.

    Justin
    May 13, 2003 - 11:04 pm
    If you come from North Carolina you know that the good Senator from that state has done all in his power to inhibit the creative powers of artists who receive public funds. The same was true of the Mayor of the City of New York.

    Justin
    May 13, 2003 - 11:14 pm
    Private sponsorship of the Arts has its little hang ups too. In the mid fourteenth to the early sixteenth century European artists were patronized by wealthy people if the artist contrived to include the donor in the painting. As a result many great works of art are really donor portraits combined with another overriding subject. The art viewer thinks he is looking at the Holy Family, for example, but on the sides of the painting in lower corners one may see worshippers who are the donors.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 14, 2003 - 03:33 am
    "At the top of the Acropolis steps Mnesicles built, in elaboration of Mycenaean pylons, an entrance with five openings, before each of which stood a Doric portico. These colonnades in time gave to the whole edifice their name of Propylaea, or Before the Gates.

    "Each portico carried a frieze of triglyphs and metopes, and was crowned with a pediment. Within the passageway was an Ionic colonnade, boldly inserted within a Doric forms.

    "The interior of the northern wing was decorated with paintings by Polygnotus and others, and contained votive tablets (pinakes) of terra cotta or marble. Hence its name of Pinakotheka, or Hall of Tablets. A small south wing remained unfinished. War, or the reaction against Pericles, put a stop to the work, and left an ungainly mass of beautiful parts as a gateway to the Parthenon.

    "Within these gates, on the left, was the strangely Oriental Erechtheum. This, too, was overtaken by a war. Not more than half of it was finished when the disaster of Aegospotami reduced Athens to chaols and poverty.

    "It was begun after Pericles' death, under the prodding of conservatives who feared that the ancient heroes Erechtheus and Cecrops, as as the Athens of the older shrine, and the sacred snakes that haunted the spot, would punish Athens for building the Parthenon on another site.

    "The varied purposes of the structure determined its design, and destroyed its unity. One wing was dedicated to Athene Polias, and housed her ancient image. Another was devoted to Erechtheus and Poseidon. The naos or cella, instead of being enclosed by a unifying peristyle, was here buttressed with three separate porticoes.

    "The northern and eastern porches were upheld by slender Ionic columns as beautiful as any of their kind. In the northern porch was a perfect portal, adorned with a molding of marble flowers. In the cella was the primitive wooden statue of Athena, which the pious believed had fallen from heaven. There, too, was the great lamp whose fire was never extinguished, and which Callimachus, the Cellini of his time, has fashioned of gold and embellished with acanthus leaves, like his Corinthian capitals.

    "The south portico was the famous Porch of the Maidens, or Caryatids. These patient women were descended, presumably, from the basket bearers of the Orient. An early caryatid at Tralles, in Asia Minor, betrays the Eastern -- probably the Assyrian -- origin of the form.

    "The drapery is superb, and the natural flexure of the knee gives an impression of ease. Even these substantial ladies seem hardly strong enough to convey that sense of sturdy and reliable support which the finest architecture gives. It was an aberration of taste that Pheidias would probably have forbidden."

    I hope that others here will help to describe this beautiful building in ways more easily understood.

    I also find it interesting that "religion" still had an effect on Ancient Greek architecture.

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 14, 2003 - 03:44 am

    Buildings of the Acropolis. Click image to access a large picture

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 14, 2003 - 03:52 am

    Here is a page of many, many links to pictures of buildings of the Acropolis.

    Links to pictures

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 14, 2003 - 03:59 am
    Magnificent links, Mal!! I hope everyone here clicks onto the photos to enlarge them and then pauses while examining them to let their imagination flow and believing that they are living in Athens 2,500 years ago.

    Robby

    georgehd
    May 14, 2003 - 05:55 am
    I am still in the US and have limited access to the site. I am trying to keep up with the posts and now that I have the book, I am with you in the reading. Downloading Mal's wonderful pictures takes too long on my slow connection so I will have to wait til I return to Cayman to see the wonders of Greek architecture on line.

    Tejas
    May 14, 2003 - 06:55 am
    Currently I am posting from the Perry-Castaneda Library, UT-Austin. iIt would take a Sherman tank to serve a trespass warrant on me in this library. Since it is one of the largest university libraryies in the world, perhaps they have a complete copy of The Story of Civilization.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 14, 2003 - 07:17 am
    Good to see you back, Tejas! I'm sure they would have all eleven volumes and in another month or so, we will move onto the third volume, "Caesar and Christ."

    Robby

    Justin
    May 14, 2003 - 01:15 pm
    You have found the right formula, Tejas. One library plus one computer equals one very good poster. I am looking forward to hearing from you again.

    Justin
    May 14, 2003 - 02:04 pm
    It is difficult to look at ruins and imagine what these buildings must have looked like when Ictinus, Phidias, and Pericles walked upon the stones of the Acropolis. Those who visit the site today stand on the very stones trod by the ancient Greeks. Some of the metopes are visible and one can discern small carvings upon them but the majority of metopes are gone from Greece. The east and west pediments contain only remnants of the sculptured narrative of Greek religious mythology. The Ionic columns that formed the enclosure of the naos and sheltered the great colored statue of Athena are broken and badly damaged. Athena is gone.

    Fortunately, Lord Elgin saved for us and for future generations the figures of the pediments, stones from the internal frieze, and metopes from the entablature. These pieces can be seen in the British Museum. Again the viewer must imagine what these magnificent sculptures looked like upon the pediments of the Parthenon. The metopes and their carvings can be viewed just above eye level. I was surprised to see how different each was from its neighbor. Each was made to fit a specific opening between tryglypths and each was adjusted to permit viewing from far below without distortion. Seen up close the adjustments are evident. I longed to see the Parthenon as a whole building,ideally, in Greece but lacking that, then in Nashville.

    The Parthenon in Nashville is not disappointing. It is in Pentellic marble, which has a brownish cast. All the pediments are in place. The interior frieze is magnificent. All the metopes can be seen outside the building in their proper places. Athena Parthenos stands in all her magesty within the naos. It is her temple. There is no mistaking that.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 15, 2003 - 04:09 am
    Everyone has heard about the Parthenon. What do we know about it? Durant helps us to understand this temple which, though partly destroyed, has withstood the test of time.

    "In the western end of the Parthenon Ictinus placed a room for her maiden priestesses, and called it the room 'of the virgins' -- ton parthenon. In the course of careless time this name of a part, by a kind of architectural metaphor, was applied to the whole.

    "Ictinus chose as his material the white marble of Mt. Pentelicus, veined with iron grains. No mortar was used. The blocks were so accurately squared and so finely finished that each stone grasped the next as if the two were one. The column drums were bored to let a small cylinder of olivewood connect them, and permit each drum to be turned around and around upon the one below it until the meeting surfaces were ground, so smooth that the division between drums was almost invisible.

    "The design was rectangular, for the Greeks did not care for circular or conical forms. Hence there were no arches in Greek architecture, though Greek architects must have been familiar with them.

    "The dimensions were modest -- 228 x 101 x 65 feet. Probably a system of proportion, like the Polycleitan canon, prevailed in every part of the building, all measurements bearing a given relation to the diameter of the column.

    "At Poseidonia the height of the column was four times its diameter. Here it was five. The new form mediated successfully between Spartan sturdiness and Attic elegance. Each column swelled slightly (three quarters of an inch in diameter) from base to middle, tapered toward the top, and leaned toward the center of its colonnade. Each corner column was a trifle thicker than the rest.

    "Every horizontal line of stylobate and entablature was curved upward towards its center, so that the eye placed at one end of any supposedly level line could not see the farther half of the line.

    "The metopes were not quite square, but were designed to appear square from below. All these curvatures were subtle corrections for optical illusions that would otherwise have made stylobate lines seem to sink in the center, columns to diminish upward the base, and corner columns to be thinner and outwardly inclined.

    "Such adjustments required considerable knowledge of mathematics and optics, and constituted but one of those mechanical features that made the temple a perfect union of science and art. In the Parthenon, as in current physics, every straight line was a curve, and, as in a painting, every part was drawn toward the center in subtle composition.

    "The result was a certain flexibility and grace that seemed to give life and freedom to the stones."

    And some of us thought it was merely a case of building a foundation, erecting a number of straight columns, and placing a roof on top!

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 15, 2003 - 04:37 am
    Of parallel interest to those here who are intrigued by the march toward civilization through architectural methods is this LINK which tells us in this morning's NY Times of a more modern vision which came to life.

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 15, 2003 - 05:20 am

    Below is a link to pictures of details of the Parthenon and information about such things as the curves deliberately placed in the construction.

    About the Parthenon

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 15, 2003 - 05:48 am

    Parthenon architecture

    Parthenon, Golden Ratio

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 15, 2003 - 05:52 am
    Those photos are so great, Mal! After enlarging each photo and just pausing to examine them in detail, I have understood much more what Durant was telling us in words. And my admiration for those ancient architects and builders increased 1000%!!

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 15, 2003 - 06:00 am
    In the Golden Ratio link, the relationship of mathematics to architecture, painting, music, etc. etc. helped me to understand even more the meaning of the overall term "Art" -- and going beyond that, the relationship of "science" to "art."

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 15, 2003 - 06:19 am

    Math was never my forte. I often wonder if I became afraid I couldn't do it because I missed a year of school because of illness. When I went back it was only a few months before I was pushed up into another grade, thus missing some important early steps in this type of thinking that I needed to know. Anyway, though I struggled through algebra, geometry, trigonometry and solid geometry, I don't even remember hearing about the Golden Ratio or that Phi is called Phi because of Phidias. Anyway, I found this mathematical animation of the Parthenon, which helps me a little. I had the same thought you did about the Greeks, Robby. What amazingly brilliant people some of them were.

    Animation of the Golden Sections of the Parthenon

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 15, 2003 - 10:58 am

    After I posted here this morning I was thinking about art and mathematics, and looked around me to see all the geometry represented by the furniture and most of everything else in this room. Then my body rebelled (too much hard work on publishing lately and probably something I ate) so I slept a few hours; got up, and went back to this subject.

    Perspective in drawing and painting is one of the hardest things a child artist, or any artist, can learn. To make anything look three dimensional on a flat surface like a piece of paper or a canvas takes more than right brain creativity and imagination. I complained that my left brain has not been exercised and developed enough, but today I realize that I use my left brain all the time, as do most people.

    The next post contains quotes by Albrecht Durer and Leonardo Da Vinci. In case you do not know Durer's work, his picture, which is often called Praying Hands, is one I'm sure you have seen. Everyone knows Da Vinci's Mona Lisa. There was a guy who made all of his brain work all of the time.

    Mal

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 15, 2003 - 11:02 am
    “Geometry is the right foundation of all painting.”

    - Albrecht Dürer (1471-1528), Course in the Art of Measurement



    "That mental discourse that originates in first principles is termed science. Nothing can be found in nature that is not part of science, like continuous quantity, that is to say, geometry, which, commencing with the surfaces of bodies, is found to have its origins in lines, the boundary of these surfaces. Yet we do not remain satisfied with this, in that we know that line has its conclusion in a point, and nothing can be smaller than that which is a point. Therefore the point is the first principle of geometry, and no other thing can be found either in nature or in the human mind that can give rise to the point.... No human investigation may claim to be a true science if it has not passed through mathematical demonstrations... The principle of the science of painting is the point; second is the line; third is the surface; fourth is the body which is enclosed by these surfaces. And that is just what is to be represented...since in truth the scope of painting does not extend beyond the representation of the solid body or the shape of all the things that are visible."


    - Leonardo da Vinci (1452 - 1519), in M. Kemp, ed., Leonardo on Painting, Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1989

    georgehd
    May 15, 2003 - 12:40 pm
    Mal your posts are fantastic! it is like getting a free course in the history of art and art theory. I have a book in Cayman on the Golden Ratio written I believe by someone who works at the Hubble Space Telescope headquarters here in Baltimore. I will post the title and author when I return. I am frustrated because I do not have time to download all of the wonderful images but will do so next week.

    Also thank you Justin.

    Justin
    May 15, 2003 - 11:27 pm
    Mal: The shots of details of the Parthenon are worth their weight in gold. One can see clearly the damage to every part of the building. The modern automobile has so eroded the metopes that almost nothing remains. Why the modern Greek government allowed that to happen is beyond understanding. The pediments are virtually empty.

    But in spite of the evident damage one can clearly see the optical adjustments that were made and the resulting linear appearance of the building. Entasis in the columns can be seen very clearly in these photos and the technigue of grinding sand between drums to remove evidence of separation stands out. The gargoyles are new. The proportional dimensions are not only harmonius they are also useful in creating beauty. These are defining moments in architecture.

    A thousand words from the Durants will not make the story of the Parthenon quite as easy to understand as the pictures you have shown us. One and all can see why the Parthenon is so precious. Mal, the photos are outstanding. I am very pleased that we spent so much time on this monument. It was well worth our efforts. Robby seems to have an uncanny sense for significant moments in history.

    Bubble
    May 16, 2003 - 12:25 am
    I have seen the Parthenon in the mid fifties. I was too young to really appreciate the architectural achievement but I did feel its majestic beauty. What struck me then was the special quality of the light on top of that mountain, the particular clarity of the sun stricking the white walls.



    In '93 the pollution in Athens was such that cars were allowed to drive in town only on alternate days. But since families usually owns more than one car, it did not stop anyone and did not improve the situation. The purity of light was only a memory and the result can be seen with the erosion of the stone work.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 16, 2003 - 03:46 am
    "More attractive on the Parthenon are the men and women of the frieze. For 525 feet along the top of the outer wall of the cella, within the portico, ran this most famous of all reliefs. Here, presumably, the youths and maids of Attica are bearing homage and gifts to Athena on the festival day of the Panathenaic games.

    "One part of the procession moves along the west and north sides, another along the south side, to meet on the east front before the goddess, who proudly offers to Zeus and other Olympians the hospitality of her city and a share of her spoils. Handsome knights move in graceful dignity on still handsomer steeds. Chariots support dignitaries, while simple folk are happy to join in on foot.

    "Pretty girls and quiet old men carry olive branches and trays of cakes. Attendants bear on their shoulders jugs of sacred wine. Stately women convey to the goddess the peplos that they have woven and embroidered for her in long anticipation of this holy day. Sacrificial victims move with bovine patience or angry prescience to their fate. Maidens of high degree bring utensils of ritual and sacrifice. Musicians play on their flutes deathless ditties of no tone.

    "Seldom have animals or men been honored with such painstaking art. With but two and a quarter inches of relief the sculptors were able, by shading and modeling, to achieve such an illusion of depth that one horse or horseman seems to be beyond another, though the nearest is raised no farther from the background than the rest. Perhaps it was a mistake to place this extraordinary relierf so high that men could not comfortably contemplate it, or exhaust its excellence.

    "Pheidias excused himself, doubtless with a twinkle in his eye, on the ground that the gods could see it.

    "But the gods were dying while he carved."

    Interesting, at least to me, that there was such a religious approach to this architecture although, I am led to understand, that Ancient Greece placed philosophy over religion.

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 16, 2003 - 06:08 am

    Below is a link to a page of thumbnail pictures of bas relief on the friezes of the Parthenon. Click the pictures to see larger ones.

    Index of friezes, the Parthenon

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 16, 2003 - 06:24 am
    Parthenon bas relief



    Parthenon friezes

    More

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 16, 2003 - 11:15 am

    I've begun to think gods to the Ancient Greeks were more super-heroes than our conception of God. Aren't buildings and statues always erected to immortalize super-heroes?

    Mal

    Justin
    May 16, 2003 - 01:59 pm
    Mal; Can you try to find copies of the Elgin Marbles. They are located at the British Museum in London.

    Lord Elgin, in 1799, tried to have drawings and casts made of the Parthenon sculptures, but the Turks objected to scaffolding, which, they said, would make visible to infidels the harem ensconced in the Erectheum. Insolent guards stood over the draftsmen while they worked. The acropolis was covered with Turkish houses at the time, and the Parthenon boasted a minaret. A small mosque encumbered the Cella floor.

    The Venetians tried to remove pedimental sculptures but dropped one and gave up. In 1674 there were twenty figures in the west pediment. By 1800 there were only four left. The Sultan then gave Elgin permission to remove "miscellaneous marbles" from the Acropolis.

    Metopes were lowered from the temple by a ships carpenter with windless cordage and twenty Greeks. It took a gun carriage and sixty men to get each metope down the Acropolis ramp. The precious cumbersome marbles suffered every vicissitude enroute from Athens to London. One consignment was shipwrecked. Lord Elgin himself suffered imprisonment in France for three years and it was not until 1814 that the sculptures were finally displayed in London.

    Elgin then suffered financial reverses and was forced to sell his marbles to the British Government for 35,000 pounds. They were then installed in the British Museum. I am indebted to Paul Mac Kendrick for most of this story.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 16, 2003 - 05:17 pm
    "Though the masterpieces of Greek art have yielded one by one to the voracity of time, their form and spirit still survive sufficiently to be a guide and stimulus to many arts, many generations, and many lands. There were faults here, as in all that men do.

    "The sculpture was too physical, and rarely reached the soul. It moves us more often to admire its perfection than to feel its life. The architecture was narrowly limited in form and style, and clung across a thousand years to the simple rectangle of the Mycenaean megaron.

    "It achieved almost nothing in secular fields. It attempted only the easier problems of construction, and avoided difficult tasks like the arch and the vault, which might have given it greater scope. It held up its roofs with the clumsy expedient of internal and superimposed colonnades. It crowded the interior of its temples with statues whose size was out of proportion to the edifice, and whose ornamentation lack the simplicity and restraint that we expect of the classic style.

    "But no faults can outweigh the fact that Greek art created the classic style. The essence of that style is order and form -- moderation in design, expression, and decoration -- proportion in the parts and unity in the whole -- the supremacy of reason without the extinction of feeling -- a quiet perfection that is content with simplicity, and a sublimity that owes nothing to size.

    "No other style but the Gothic has had so much influence. Indeed, Greek statuary is still the ideal, and until yesterday the Greek column dominated architecture to the discouragement of more congenial forms.

    "It is good tht we are freeing ourselves from the Greeks. Even perfection becomes oppressive when it will not change. Long after our liberation is complete we shall find instruction and stimulus in that art which was the life of reason in form, and in that classic style which was the most characteristic gift of Greece to Mankind."

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 16, 2003 - 05:38 pm
    Before leaving this section on architecture, participants might be interested in reading an ARTICLE written by the architecture critic of the New York Times.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 16, 2003 - 05:46 pm
    Architecture is the theme of this coming Sunday's New York Times Magazine. For those who want to take a break from the architecture of 2,500 years ago click HERE to read the feature article about the architecture of the Future.

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 16, 2003 - 05:58 pm
    Architecture is the theme of this coming Sunday's New York Times Magazine. For those who want to take a break from the architecture of 2,500 years ago click HERE to read the feature article about the architecture of the Future.

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 17, 2003 - 03:46 am
    And now comes a section in The Life of Greece which many here will find of intense interest, in other words, related to that fourth element of civilization stated by Durant in the Heading above --

    The Advancement of Learning

    "The cultural activity of Periclean Greece takes chiefly three forms -- art, drama, and philosophy. In the first, religion is the inspiration. In the second religion is the battle ground. In the third religion is the victim.

    "Since the organization of a religious group presumes a common and stable creed, every religion sooner or later comes into opposition with that fluent and changeful current of secular thought that we confidently call the progress of knowledge. In Athens the conflict was not always visible on the surface, and did not directly affect the masses of the people.

    "The scientists and the philosophers carried on their work without explicitly attacking the popular faith, and often mitigated the strife by using the old religious terms as symbols or allegories for their new beliefs. Only now and then, as in the indictments of Anaxagoras, Aspasia, Diagoras of Melos, Euripides, and Socrates, did the struggle come out into the open, and become a matter life and death.

    "But it was there. It ran through the Periclean age like a major theme, played in many keys and elaborated in many variations and forms. It was heard most distinctly in the skeptical discourses of the Sophists and in the materialism of Democritus. It sounded obscurely in the piety of Aeschylus, in the heresies of Euripides, even in the irreverent banter of the conservative Aristophanes. It was violently recapitulated in the trial and death of Socrates.

    "Around this theme the Athens of Pericles lived its mental life."

    Now let me see if I get this straight. Religion, per se, began to die. It began to die because some of the thinkers of that day looked within theirselves and began to doubt the religious beliefs of that day. However, those "thinkers" lived in a different world, so to speak, from the "average" person and as the average person who followed the popular and stable creed would have been horrified to know of this heresy, those thinkers (philosphers?) continued to use the common religious terms to cover up their new found thought.

    Even today "religion comes into opposition with secular thought." Unndoubtedly this will be discussed here although, for the usual reasons, we will abstain from giving the names of current names in the news.

    Durant says that "conflict was not always visible on the surface." Is today's conflict "hidden" from the "average man on the street?" Do we hear religious terms used to represent secular thought? -- or perhaps vice versa? Do the scientists and philosophers of today "carry on their work without explicitly attacking the popular faith?" Just how does learning "advance" in our current Western civilization?

    What is happening in the halls of academia? What is happening in the churches, synagogues, and mosques? Is there a conflict? Is it hidden?

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 17, 2003 - 10:40 am

    If I can get my mind around the fact that I learned today that my mother’s sister, my last living relative in my parents’ generation, has died at the age of 99; my former mother-in-law ( 96 today) is very close to the end of her life ( necessitating a rush trip to New England last weekend to see their grandmother by my daughter and my New York son ), and a former WREX writer and good friend of mine is in hospice care, maybe I can think about the conflict between philosophy and religion in Ancient Greece and our own time.

    Today religion very much comes into opposition with secular thought. To state a belief that differs from religious ones can bring great criticism and sometimes threats of violence. In the religion forums in SeniorNet, declaring that one is an agnostic or atheist instigates name-calling to the point that those outside the "normal belief" are accused of being un-American. Scientists are suspect because they talk about evolution and the beginning of the world in ways that are not like what is told in "holy" religious books.

    With the stress on extreme fundamentalism that I see in the United States today, conflict between "believers" and those considered to be "heretics" is very visible. People in this country who have beliefs different from those in the Christian Bible, for example, must of necessity tread very lightly in respect to their views. The word "secular" become almost as offensive as the word "liberal". There is also today, unfortunately, a rise in anti-Semitism.

    With the kind of regression I see, I don't know where this is going in our civilization, whether it will follow the way of Ancient Greece and somehow turn to philosophy rather than religion or not.

    Mal

    Justin
    May 17, 2003 - 10:42 pm
    Religious people appear to me to be followers rather than independent thinkers. In general, it is the independent thinker, who is responsible for advances in society. They are people who have secular interests rather than religious interests.

    I see three classes of people in society today. There are those who believe in God and who feel their lives are directed by an all powerful being. They are certain they know the answer to all perplexing problems. God will determine the outcome. They can function in a secular environment so long as their religious concepts are unchallenged.

    There are those who do not care whether there is a god or not. The issue does not interest them. They function in a secular environment and are able to challenge essential hypotheses with no concern for the character of the out comes. They are willing to let the chips fall where they may and take advantage of the results.

    There are those who recognize the falaciousness of religious argument and seek to advance their arguments as strongly as religious people advance their arguments. They function in a secular environment.

    Justin
    May 17, 2003 - 11:27 pm
    Those who believe are a very large segment of the world population today. Those who don't care about the subject constitute another large segment. Those who don't believe but do care about the subject are a fairly small part of the population.

    This distribution of the population probably has not changed since the Greek Golden Age. Those who believe predominante. Their power was strong enough to force the hemlock on Socrates. Through the seventeenth century their power was strong enough to make Galileo recant.

    There are states in the US that provide revisionist text books to children and that encourage the teaching of religious concepts in public classrooms. There are politicians on the National stage who advance religious ideas in place of secular ones in the public arena.

    The advance of fundementalism in the world is an unfortunate trend. It means that ignorance is growing in spite of all efforts to extend education to the great mass of the people in civilized society. We have tried to make thinkers of all our children and have, in the main, probably failed.

    I see no reason to expect an outcome today any different from the Greek outcome or from the Romans for that matter, who adopted Greek religious ideas.

    Bubble
    May 18, 2003 - 02:17 am
    yes, these three divisions exist everywhere.
    I was under the impression that the 'don't care' is the more numerous one, but because the big minority of believers is so vocal and forceful, the noise they make is more noticeable and thus it seems credible they would be the majority.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 18, 2003 - 02:57 am
    Justin, you say:--"We have tried to make thinkers of all our children and have, in the main, probably failed."

    Aside from the religious aspect, any comments here regarding that statement? What about high school math students? What about college students in philosophy classes?

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 18, 2003 - 04:09 am
    Should aspiring journalists be required to take courses in statistics and economics, never mind psychology, law and philosophy? Read this ARTICLE in this morning's NY Times for a possible answer.

    Robby

    Bubble
    May 18, 2003 - 04:43 am
    It is hard to comment since I have no idea of the curriculum in US, nor in Europe nowadays for that matter.



    Locally I find the higher education too specialized. Even in highschool the stress is on grades for university, not on the knowledge. A general education is like an unending wealth to be used through one's entire life. Learning to make use of the tools for searching, analyzing and additional learning is more precious than a few topics memorized in depth for the next test.



    Of course it is generalization. From what I heard from Mal's children and grandchildren, her family is blessed with thinking minds. I don't see it around me where the material success is the ultimate proof of being someone.



    It also seems that the basics of good spelling, thought through sentences and good language are a lost art. I am appalled at seeing teenagers incapable of being coherent in expressing their thoughts.
    Bubble

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 18, 2003 - 05:24 am
    "Pure science, in fifth-century Greece was studied and developed by men who were philosophers rather than scientists. To the Greeks higher mathematics was an instrument not of practice but of logic -- directed less to the conquest of the physical environment than to the intellectual construction of an abstract world.

    "In popular arithmetic one upright stroke indicated 1, two strokes 2, three 3, and four 4. Five, 10, 100, 1000, and 10,000 were expressed by the initial letter of the Greek word for the number -- pente, deka, hekaton, chiliai, myriai.

    "Greek mathematics never achieved a symbol for zero. Like our own, it betrayed its Oriental origin by taking from the Egyptians the decimal system of counting by tens, and from the Babylonians, in astronomy and geography, the duodecimal or sexagesimal system of counting by twelves or sixties, as still on our clocks, globes, and charts.

    "Probably an abacus helped the people with the simpler calculations. Fractions were painful for them. To work with a complex fraction they reduced it to an accumulation of fractions having 1 as their common numerator. So 23/32 was broken down into 1/2 + 1/8 + 1/16 + 1/32."

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 18, 2003 - 07:18 am

    The trouble for me with having my mother's sister die and my former mother-in-law, who was a big part of my life for over thirty years -- before, during and after my marriage -- close to death, is that on the eve of my 75th birthday I'm faced with my own mortality. When my daughter told me yesterday I'd better get in shape if I'm going to live another 24 years to age 99 as my Aunt Helen did, I began to pull out of this funk, so I cleaned the refrigerator and counters in the kitchen instead of making web pages or writing.

    My latest writing effort is a short story called "Emailing God". It is about an 11 year old girl who meets God in a chat-room. This got my mind on young people and what they're like today, something that interests me very much. As long as I have something to look forward to, like the publishing deadlines I set up for myself, or writing about new and different things, I don't waste my time introspectively contemplating the navel of my mortality, and I'm fine.

    That long preamble, which I plan to leave in this post, relevant or not, leads me to say to Bubble that my children had rather unusual parents. Their father is a creative scientist, a stable conservative. I am through and through a creative artist with an enormous curiosity, who has also been a kind of rebel. The differences ( and often conflict ) between science and art led to much discussion among the family. Our kids had no choice. They had to question things and think.

    I know only two of my five grandchildren well. My son Rob's daughter, Megan, is as much a rebel artist as her grandmother is. ( And it has gotten her into just as much trouble! ) My daughter's son, Hil, is as much a scientific-thinking conservative as his grandfather was at that age. I first met their grandfather when he was 15. Hil is 18. It's funny to think that these qualities skipped a generation to appear in these two young people. Two of my children are a combination of both.

    The complaints Megan and Hil have had about school have been that they had to spend too much time preparing for tests such as the SAT's. When I had to take the Scholastic Aptitude Test to get into college all those years ago, I walked into the examination room cold with only what I'd learned in four years of high school as foundation for taking the test. Both Megan and Hil had to study for and take pre-examination tests for the SAT's and pre-pre-examinations for the tests and pre-pre-pre-examinations, too. It seemed to them at times that their main business in school was preparation for passing the test which would get them into a college or university.

    Neither my children nor my grandchildren were raised in a church which propounded "the truth". All of them know a great deal about various religions of the world, however, and talk about them at the dinner table. We seem to be a secular family with many, many interests, one of which is religion.

    By the way, my grandson, Hil, will be majoring in mathematics. He's decided he wants to be a statistician. The father of one of his friends is a statistician who earns a very good week's pay. Hil said to me recently, "I might as well do something I like that will pay me well. Why not?"

    Hopefully, I'll get off this personal kick and come in and post something more worthwhile soon.

    Mal

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 18, 2003 - 07:21 am
    Mal:--You forgot to say that both of us have to live long enough to complete "The Story of Civilization."

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 18, 2003 - 07:23 am

    How could I forget such a stupendous thing to live for, Robby?

    Mal

    Bubble
    May 18, 2003 - 07:51 am
    May I join you two 'summitities' for the next twelve years or so in SoC?



    You are right, Mal, yours was a very lucky family intellectually. Mahlia of many background would offer as rich a background to hers. Not many are as favored by fate. Bubble

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 18, 2003 - 08:22 am

    I have to post this because I'm so excited about it. I'm a musician without a musical instrument; haven't owned a piano for many years. A writer in WREX became aware of this fact and wrote a letter to me in which he said he has an electronic keyboard he never uses which he's sending to me. At last, at last, I'll be able to compose some of the music which has been nagging at my head for a very long time. Keeping in mind, of course, that it was the Ancient Greeks who first came up with the idea that mathematics is involved in the making of music. Now if I only had a synthesizer so I could make midi music files to put on my web pages!

    Edit:~ Well, I do know a way to tape music I do and convert that music to WAV files, don't I? That doesn't require a synthesizer. Just wait and see what I come up with next!

    Mal

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 18, 2003 - 09:38 am
    "Geometry was a favorite study of the philosophers, again less for its practical value than for its theoretical interest -- the fascination of its deductive logic -- its union of subtlety and clarity -- its imposing architecture of thought.

    "Three problems particularly attracted these mathematic metaphysicians -- the squaring of the circle -- the trisection of the angle -- and the doubling of the cube.

    "How popular the first puzzle became appears in Aristophanes' Birds, in which a character representing the astronomer Meton enters upon the stage armed with ruler and compasses, and undertakes to show 'how your circle may be made a dquare' -- i.e. how to find a square whose area will equal that of a given circle.

    "Perhaps it was such a problem as these that led to the later Pythagoreans to formulate a doctrine of irrational numbers and incommensurable quantites. -- (Irrational numbers are those that cannot be expressed by either a whole number or a fraction, like the squre root of 2. Incommensurable quantities are those for which no third quantity can be found which bears to each of them a relation expressible by a rational number, like the side and diagonal of a square, or the radius and circumference of a circle.)

    "It was the Pythagoreans, too, whose studies of the parabola, the hyperbola, and the ellipse prepared for the epochal work of Apollonius of Perga on conic sections. - - (A moonlike figure made by the arcs of two intersecting circles.)

    "About 420 Hippias of Elia accomplished the trisection of an angle through the quadratix curve. About 410 Democritus of Abdera announcd that 'in constructing lines according to given conditions no one has ever surpassed me, not even the Egyptians.' He almost made the boast forgivable by writing four books on geometry, and finding formulas for the areas of cones and pyramids.

    "Even into their art geometry entered actively, making many forms of ceramic and architectural ornament, and determining the proportions and curvatures of the Parthenon."

    I wonder how many geometry teachers of our time refer to Ancient Greece?

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 18, 2003 - 10:34 am

    These pages are translated from Greek. There are some interesting links on them to follow. Click "Contents" for more.

    The Pyramid of Hellenicon. Click "Hellenikon" on the left.

    The Ancient Geodetic System

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 18, 2003 - 12:01 pm
    The GREEN quotes move us on to Durant's next section --"It was part of the struggle between religion and science that the study of astronomy was forbidden by Athenian law at the height of the Periclean age.

    "At Acragas Empedocles suggested that light takes time to pass from one point to another.

    "At Elea Parmenides announced the sphericity of the earth, divided the planet into five zones, and observed that the moon always has its bright portion turned toward the sun.

    "At Thebes Philolaus the Pythagorean deposed the earth from the center of the universe, and reduced it to the status of one among many planets revolving about a 'central fire.'

    "Leucippus, pupil of Philolaus, attributed the origin of the stars to the incandescent combustion and concentration of material 'drawn onward in the universal movement of the circular vortex.'

    "At Abdera Democritus, pupil of Leucippus and student of Babylonia lore, described the Milky Way as a multitude of small stars, and summarized astronomic history as the periodical collision and destruction of an infinite number of worlds.

    "At Chios Oenopides discovered the obliquity of the ecliptic.

    "Nearly everywhere among the Greek colonies the fifth century saw scientific developments remarkable in a period almost devoid of scientific instruments."

    Is anyone here astounded at the knowledge of those ancient Greeks, especially considering their lack of scientific instruments?

    Robby

    Justin
    May 18, 2003 - 12:11 pm
    Most, if not all geometry teachers, refer to the greeks. We continue to teach Euclidian geometry. It is hard to do that without reference to Euclid and his methods.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 18, 2003 - 12:15 pm
    I guess my teacher in high school was the exception. She might have been teaching Euclidian geometry but she never mentioned Euclid.

    Robby

    Justin
    May 18, 2003 - 12:20 pm
    I think we fail as educators because we put little or no emphasis on critical thinking and as a result the skill is unappreciated. We learn math by rote and association. Are the Euclidian postulates challenged? Only Einstein has been able to bend a straight line. We try, as a general rule, to be friendly and amenable. Critical people who challenge things are frowned upon in social gatherings.

    Justin
    May 18, 2003 - 12:22 pm
    Robby: You are pulling my hypoteneuse.

    georgehd
    May 18, 2003 - 02:12 pm
    I just returned to Cayman to find so many interesting posts that I hesitate to jump in. Teaching for tests - when I was a teacher, we never taught for tests. In fact we discouraged parents who wanted special instruction for their children on the SAT's. Our philosophy was that a good education prepared one for the SAT's. Achievement tests were another matter as they did deal with specific subject matter and could be studied for. As a biology teacher, I never finished a book in a single year and therefore my students never had certain subjects. If they wanted to take a biology achievement test, I told them about the problem and we tried to work out a study regimen that would round out their knowledge and hopefully help them on the test.

    Critical thinking was emphasized particularly by English, History and Science teachers. Unfortunately, the math department (IMO) was never particularly strong in this regard - I tended to blame college teachers for the failure of the math programs during the 60's and 70's. As a student in high school, one of my great joys was Euclidian geometry. I loved it!

    I am not sure how math is taught any more as the methods and order of subjects as changed a number of times. I will check with my grandchildren.

    I should mention that I spent two hours on Saturday as part of a group discussing graduate art education with five Master of Fine Arts Graduates. It was one of the most interesting experinces I have had in a long time. The five graduates were mature and intellectually and conceptually committed to their craft. They articulated how they made the decision to attend graduate school and then described the process that led them into a specific art thesis. They applied critical thinking to their work. As you can tell I was most impressed (and the art was fantastic). One of the trends that we see in art education today (and remember my background is in science) is the blurring of boundaries between painting, sculpture, drawing, etc. The graduate students all learned from their peers in other media. And of course digital arts, an entirely new field, is of interest to almost everyone.

    Some time ago, we asked whether any schools similar to the Greek model existed today. I would say that the graduate program at the Maryland Institute comes close as it does involve a community of scholar artists who teach and learn from each other. I am sure that there are other similar graduate schools around the world.

    georgehd
    May 18, 2003 - 02:18 pm
    I located an entire set of the Durant history and bought it. If I do not finish before I die, I can at least use the books in weight training. It is a very heavy read.

    Mal, I took up the organ about six years ago; it is similar in many ways to a keyboard. I have the capability to create and use MIDI files but have never done so. My learning curve has been only slightly positive on the organ. Good luck on your new endeavor.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 18, 2003 - 02:34 pm
    Hurrah, George!! Now you have to stay alive as long as we do.

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 18, 2003 - 02:39 pm
    Here are STANDARDS of Critical Thinking.

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 18, 2003 - 03:54 pm

    The geometry teachers in the high school where I went talked about Euclid and Pythagoras. That was a school where the study of Latin was strongly emphasized. They stopped teaching classical Greek the year I entered. I was upset. I had intended to take both Latin and Greek. They did teach Italian as well as French, Spanish and German, though.

    George, I have played electronic organs; wasn't aware of their midi file-creating capabilities. I also have played electronic pianos. The sound amazes me. Don't get discouraged. If you started playing the organ without much musical training beforehand, it would be like my being given a biology lab and starting from scratch.

    If you're learning classical music, get some Bach and work on it. I started my beginning piano pupils on Bach and early Mozart. Why not? It's much more fun than John Thompson is, and does wonders for your technique. If you're interested in jazz, get a book of basic jazz chords and improvise. That'll get your right brain working! Oscar Peterson, here comes George!

    I'll be back later after I dig up something about Anaxagoras.

    P.S. I read that Critical Thinking essay and still don't know what it is. If one asks a lot of questions, is that enough?

    Mal

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 18, 2003 - 04:24 pm

    The page linked below is in Spanish. For those who don't know the language, there is a picture of an artist's conception of Anaxagoras, plus a graph showing the Pythagorean theorem and another graph showing work by Hippocrates. ( Which, of course, everyone understands. )

    Justin, I wonder why there are so many jokes about the Pythagorean theorem? Referring to your hypotenuse statement, Sir.

    Anaxagoras, et al.

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 18, 2003 - 04:30 pm
    Speaking of Oscar Peterson, he is now 78 years old. He's been spending his "retirement" writing and sequencing music with synthesizers. I've seen pictures of his equipment. It's every today musician's dream.

    Never in the world did I ever think I'd go so whacky over electronic music and the production of it. It has amazing possibilities, more than I can say. I wonder what the Ancient Greeks would think about that? Maybe they did. Who knows?

    Mal

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 18, 2003 - 05:11 pm
    "When Anaxagoras tried to do similar work at Athens he found the mood of the people and the Assembly as hostile to free inquiry as the friendship of Pericles was encouraging. He had come from Clazomenae about 480 B.C. at twenty years of age. Anaximenes so interested him in the stars that when someone asked him the object of life he answered, 'The investigation of sun, moon, and heaven.' He neglected his patrimony to chart the earth and the sky, and fell into poverty while his book On Nature was acclaimed by the intelligentsia of Athens as the greatest scientific work of the century.

    "It carried on the traditions and speculations of the Ionian school. The universe, said Anaxagoras, was originally a chaos of diverse seeds (spermata), pervaded by a 'nous', or Mind, tenuously physical, and akin to the source of life and motion in ourselves. And as mind gives order to the chaos of our actions, so the World Mind gave order to the primeval seeds, setting them into a rotatory vortex, and guiding them toward the development of organic forms.

    "This rotation sorted the seeds into the four elements -- fire, air, water, and earth -- and separated the world into two revolving layers, an outer one of 'ether' and an inner one of air. 'In consequence of this violent whirling motion, the surrounding fiery ether tore away stones from the earth, and kindled them into stars.'

    "The sun and the stars are glowing masses of rock: 'The sun is a red-hot mass many times larger than the Peloponnesus.' When their revolving motion wanes, the stones of the outer layer fall upon the earth as meteors.

    "The moon is an incandescent solid, having on its surface plains, mountains, and ravines. It receives its light from the sun, and is of all heavenly bodies the nearest to the earth. The moon is eclipsed through the interposition of the earth . . . the sun through the interposition of the moon.'

    "Probably other celestial bodies are inhabited like the earth.' Upon them 'men are formed, and other animals that have life. The men dwell in cities, and cultivate fields as we do.'

    "Out of the inner or gaseous layer of our planet successive condensations produced clouds, water, earth, and stones. Winds are due to rarefactions of the atmosphere produced by heat of the sun. 'Thunder is caused by the collision of clouds, and lightning by their friction.'

    "The quantity of matter never changes, but all forms begin and pass away. In time the mountains will become the sea. The various forms and objects of the world are brought into being by increasingly definite aggregations of homogeneous parts (homoiomeria). All organism were originally generated out of earth, moisture, and heat, and thereafter from one another.

    "Man has developed beyond other animals because his erect posture freed his hands for grasping things."

    I found it necessary to read this two or three times and I wonder if Einstein ever read it.

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 18, 2003 - 05:20 pm

    This is an interesting page, mostly because of the pictures on it. Be sure to notice the second one down, a study of the flat earth.

    Flat earth and other images

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 18, 2003 - 06:25 pm

    Anaxagoras Fragments and Commentaries

    Justin
    May 18, 2003 - 08:12 pm
    As I recall Anaxagorous had to get out of town to avoid the hemlock. Socrates was not so lucky. Here critical thinking was the victim of a broad and commonplace mindset based in ignorance and superstition. Today that mindset is called fundementalism and it continues to be powerful.

    When I was in high school ( it was pre war),critical thinking was unheard of. One never challenged the status quo. Grades were based on how much of the teachers words one could feed back either orally or in written work. Fortunately, I was a good parrot.

    George's and Mal's experience make me think they were in an academic paradise, not the American public school system. Latin, French and Spanish were available to me but one at a time. After two years of Latin, one could take two years French or Spanish. But it was all a joke. Latin, French and Spanish were useful in learning the mechanics of grammar, that should have been taught in the English department. Intermediate algebra, plane and solid geometry and trig were available and in that order.

    English was eclectic. It took a complete semester to sink the Titanic. Grammar was an elementary school exposure. Writing was learned in exam essays and by writing letters to one's neighbor. Passing notes was a delightful pastime that earned detention for practitioners. Penmanship was improved by repetitive writing of the preamble to the constitution. The class entrepreneur was a guy who sold prewritten preambles in return for cigarettes and change.

    Sat and Psat were not a concern. We were outstanding in assemblies. I read the Bible from center stage and every body else slept when the lights went out. Whenever, I hear Blue moon or On Wisconsin, today, I know it's sleep time. Now that I think about it high school was fun. I hope you all enjoyed it as much as I did.

    Bubble
    May 19, 2003 - 03:34 am
    It all comes down to the teacher' skills: a dedicated one can influence all his students future. No topic is boring when presented in the right way, and children are malleable. They are not all avid learners, but if their curiosity is tickled... The Greeks had great thinkers and great teachers.
    Bubble

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 19, 2003 - 04:29 am
    "These achievements -- the foundation of meterorology, the correct explanation of eclipses, a rational hypothesis of planetary formation, the discovery of the borrowed light of the moon, and an evolutionary conception of animal and human life -- made Anaxagoras at once the Copernicus and Darwin of his age.

    "The Athenians might have forgiven him these apercus had he not neglected his nous (mind) in explaining the events of nature and history. Perhaps they suspected that this nous, like Euripides' deux ex machina, was a device for saving the author's skin. Aristotle notes that Anaxagoras sought natural explanations everywhere.

    "When a ram with a single horn in the center of its forehead was brought to Pericles, and a soothsayer interpreted it as a supernatural omen, Anaxogoras had the animals's skull cleft, and showed that the brain, instead of filling both sides of the cranium, had grown upward towards the center, and so had produced the solitary horn.

    "He aroused the simple by giving a natural explanation of meteors, and reduced many mythical figures to personified abstractions."

    Moral -- Don't be too smart? Are we talking about class differences? Attitudes toward being educated?

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 19, 2003 - 05:13 am
    Click HERE to read an article in this morning's NY Times relating to class differences and education.

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 19, 2003 - 05:24 am
    Some see the development of a mind within a university important and others see only the value of the building's metal which can be sold. Does anyone see this ARTICLE from the NY Times as describing a situation similar to the one where Durant tells of the attitude of the people he called "the simple" toward Anaxagoras?

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 19, 2003 - 06:44 am
    "The Athenians took Anaxagoras good-humoredly for a time, merely nicknaming him 'nous.' But when no other way could be found of weakening Pericles, Cleon, his demagogic rival, brought a formal indictment of imnpiety against Anaxagoras on the charge that he had described the sun(still to the people a god) as a mass of stone on fire. He pursued the case so relentlessly that the philosopher, despite Pericles' brave defense of him, was convicted.

    "Having no taste for hemlock, Anaxagoras fled to Lamsacus on the Hellespont, where he kept himself alive by teaching philosophy. When news was brought to him that the Athenians had condemned him to death, he said 'Nature has long since condemned both them and me.'

    "He died a few years later, aged seventy-three."

    And so piety won out.

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 19, 2003 - 08:16 am

    I've known people in my life who feared education and educated people, and thought education was nothing but bad. My very good Slovak friend, John Grech, grew up as an uneducated peasant in Czechoslovakia and came here alone to the States to find work when he was 18 years old without knowing a word of English or knowing how to read much of his native language. He was a man who lived by his hands and the muscles in his back, despite the fact that it was obvious that he was very bright. On his own without a book or manual he could figure out how almost anything worked. He was also a superior craftsman, made himself a loom and did beautiful weavings, among other things. I first met him at a craft fair.

    A widower twenty-five years older than I, he befriended me at a very difficult time of my life. In one way, he was proud that anyone who was educated appreciated what he did. In another way, he was extremely resentful of the fact that I read books. "Books, they poison," he often said to me. "They eat up your brain. They not natural, books."

    John was afraid people who read books would walk all over him. He felt terribly threatened by books and education. I have to say here that I learned a great deal about life from my friend, John, who got me down off a high horse I didn't belong on.

    He was a Catholic who knew less about his religion than I, who was never a Catholic, did. John believed in magic and fate, omens, supernatural mysteries and God in that order.

    I've known others like him, not as extreme perhaps, but who thought and think the same way he did. These are the kinds of people who loot libraries, steal metal window frames from universities and burn the books they find. These are the kinds who determine the fate of geniuses like Anaxagoras, men and women with cultivated minds who threaten their well-being by questioning what these people believe and live by.

    Mal

    Justin
    May 19, 2003 - 01:57 pm
    Mal;I can not add one more thing to your comment that would enhance the image you give us of Anaxagoras's plight and of the fears of the people who caused it. Every once in a while one of us writes a beautiful comment about a life situation. This time you did it. Your response was vivid, clear and biting. Thank you.

    Justin
    May 19, 2003 - 02:07 pm
    On second thought, I will comment.
    Hitler used the fears of people, just such as those who condemned Anaxagoras, to achieve his ends. The fearful ones were the book burners and the bullies of Crystal Nacht. History is replete with examples of this kind of person acting to injure the educated.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 19, 2003 - 05:59 pm
    "There was no general Greek calendar. Every state had its own. Each of the four possible points for beginning a new year was adopted somewhere in Greece. Even the months changed their names across frontiers.

    "The Attic calendar reckoned months by the moon, and the years by the sun. As twelve lunar months made only 360 days, a thirteenth month was added every second year to bring the calendar into harmony with the sun and the seasons.

    Since this made the year ten days too long, Solon introduced the custom of having alternate months of twenty-nine and thirty days, arranged into three weeks (dekades) of ten (occasionally nine) days each, and as an excess of four days still remained, the Greeks omitted one month every eighth year.

    "In this incredibly devious way they at last arrived at a year of 365 1/4 days."

    Anyone know what date it is?

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 19, 2003 - 07:14 pm
    "Anaxagoras correctly explained the annual overflow of the Nile as due to the spring thaws and rains of Ethiopia. Greek geologists attributed the Straits of Gibraltar to a cleaving earthquake, and the Aegean isles to a subsiding sea.

    "Xanthus of Lydia, about 406, surmised that the Mediterranean and the Red Sea were formerly connected at Suez. Aeschylus noted the belief of his time that Sicily had been torn asunder from Italy by a convulsion of the earth.

    "Scylax of Caria (521-485) explored the whole coast of the Mediterranean and the Black Sea. No Greek seems to have dared so adventurous a voyage of discovery as that which the Carthaginian Hanno, with a fleet of sixty ships, led through Gibraltar some 2600 miles down the west coast of Africa (ca. 490).

    "Maps of the Mediterranean world were common in Athens at the end of the fifth century. Physics, so far as we know, remained undeveloped, though the curvatures of the Parthenon show considerable knowledge of optics.

    "The Pythagoreans, towards 450, announced the most lasting of Greek scientific hypotheses -- the atomic constitution of matter. Empedocles and others expounded a theory of the evolution of man from lower forms of life, and described the slow advance of man from savagery to civilization."

    Did Empedocles (along with the other Ancient Greeks) answer the question of Voltaire in the Heading above?

    Robby

    Justin
    May 19, 2003 - 10:47 pm
    Twenty five hundred years after Empedocles suggested that man evolved from lower forms of life, we deify Darwin for saying the same thing. The Darwinian rediscovery was necessary because the ideas of Empedicles had been tossed on the trash heap during the Middle Ages when superstition ruled men's minds.

    The loss of knowledge during the Medieval period was enormous. So many ideas we had just begun to grasp from the Egyptian, Greek, and Roman civilizations, disappeared in this period of religious dominance.

    The forces that sought to destroy Anaxagoras were rampantly in control in the Medieval period. The effects of the application of that power may in the be seen in the Dante discussion.

    Justin
    May 19, 2003 - 10:58 pm
    Voltair could have found an answer to his question in every civilization that preceded his. Each civilization we have studied has contributed a little to the answer. Some cultures have added more than others to the advance from barbarism to civilization but each one has provided it's little bit.

    Bubble
    May 20, 2003 - 12:46 am
    and we are still adding to ours... Sometimes it looks like a strange dance: two steps forward and one step back.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 20, 2003 - 03:50 am
    Durant moves us on (see GREEN quotes in Heading above) to an extremely important forward move toward civilization --

    "In the fifth century Greek medicine was in large measure bound up with religion, and the treatment of disease was still practiced by the temple priests of Aselepius. This temple therapy used a combination of empirical medicine with impressive ritual and charms that touched and released the imagination of the patients. Possibly hypnosis and some form of anesthesia were also employed.

    "Secular medicine competed with this ecclesiastical medicine. Though both groups ascribed their origin to Asclepius, the profane Asclepiads rejected religion aids, made no claim to miraculous cures, and gradually placed medicine upon a rational basis."

    Is there anyone here who doubts that ritual and/or charms still hold a place in the world of medicine? Any ideas? Any examples?

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 20, 2003 - 07:17 am

    I admit to a great mistrust of medical doctors, which has led to the practice on my part of healing myself. This is based on a long history of being used as a guinea pig from early on for certain treatments and surgical procedures which caused me pain and did nothing except make me feel worse than I did when I walked in the doctor's door.

    The most traumatic thing, physically and mentally, was when I was put in a contraption that had leather straps and a round cap-like thing which was hung by chains from the ceiling and placed on my head, then buckled under my chin. With the use of a crank, I was lifted up until my feet dangled in the air so that I was hanging like a helpless marionette.

    Wet bandages laced with plaster were then wound around me from my armpits down over my torso to my thighs. I had to hang that way until the plaster dried enough that I could be taken down.

    So dizzy I could not walk, I was carried to a table where people lifted me up and laid me down and cut through the front of the plaster with a saw. Steel loops were then put on the cast top and bottom, and two bands of steel were put through those loops to lock the thing on. Then I was told I could go home and that after time passed, I would be "better". I was 13 years old.

    I wore that cast a year. It did nothing to prevent the spinal curvature and emotional scars from the experience I have today. One of the people who was responsible for my going through painful operations and treatment like this actually apologized to me much later in my life for making me go through what I did.

    I'm tired of being treated like a "thing" by doctors instead of a living, breathing human being who laughs and cries and hurts and feels good or bad. In my long career of being examined and treated by medical doctors, I've known only two who seemed to care and actually listened to what I had to say about this body I know better than anyone else.

    I don't know whether this can be considered a ritual, but there is in my country a terrible tendency to deify medical doctors and accept what they say and their decisions without question, as if these people, indeed, are the gods they often act like.

    Mal

    Annie3
    May 20, 2003 - 09:15 am
    Oh Malryn that is so sad, and only thirteen years old. You have overcome more than most. And I would also like to say that I enjoy reading your posts as you have a lot of knowledge.

    Justin
    May 20, 2003 - 01:02 pm
    Medicine has not been completely divorced from religion. There are some groups such as Mary Baker Eddy's and others who seem to rely upon prayer as therapy. Every once in a while we encounter a child in pain and parents who refuse medical assistance for religious reasons. The courts are asked from time to time to intervene in cases such as these.

    Voodoo, is thought to be useful in treating certain diseases. Native American medicine men have been known to use charms and incantations for the cure of some pathologies. They must have worked occasionally for most tribes employed medicine men. These fellows may have been aware of drugs and herbs that cure wounds and disease before our drug industry invented them as new miracle therapies.

    The Chinese have treatments and drugs that are foreign to us and that seem uncertain in value but the Chinese continue to use them and to recover from disease.

    georgehd
    May 20, 2003 - 01:31 pm
    Medical practice is a science but it is also an art. Far too many doctors know about the science and far too few know about the art. Holistic medicine is only recently being taught in medical schools; eastern herbal cures and accupuncture are just recently being accepted as alternatives to traditional medicine.

    We have a small poodle (4 pounds) which almost died about sixteen months ago. We actually thought she was dead on Christmas morning 2002. She has a collapsing trachea and for some reason her liver functions had stopped. Vets here and in Florida perscribed a number of drugs and a special diet. When in Florida, my wife visited a holistic dog doctor who recommended a liquid enzyme mixture that had successfully been used on humans. We cut out most of the perscribed drugs, used the enzymes and VOILA Sophie is like a new dog at age 12. No vet seems to be able to explain what happened and they are amazed by the results. Doctors should not be treated as God's who know everything; patients need to be their own advocates and question doctors when they feel it necessary.

    I think that it is most interesting that rational medicine and rational science were opposed by the philosophers and the religious groups. This led to 1700 years of the suppression of experimentation and scientific exploration. Anaxagorus was condemned to death in Greek times; Galileo was practically condemned to death by the Catholic church in the early 1600's. In another discussion we are concerned with Religion becoming Evil. The church did as much to hold back the development of Western Civilization as the Greeks did to advance it.

    georgehd
    May 20, 2003 - 01:42 pm
    I also find it interesting to read that science (natural philosophy) was an intellectual pursuit and not an experimental pursuit. This of course if a big difference between modern science (1700 on) and early science. Medicine seems to be the one area where a reasoned experimental approach was tried.

    "Hippocrates insists that philosophical theories have no place in medicine, and that treatment must proceed by careful observation and accurate recording of specific cases and facts. He does not quite realize the value of experiment; but he is resolved to be guided by experience." page 344

    In light of the current epedemic of obesity, I found the following appropriate - "a man should have only one meal a day, unless he have a very dry belly."

    "For where there is love of man, there is also love of the art."

    "The ideal of his profession; for 'a physician who is a lover of wisdom is the equal of a god.'" Hippocrates

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 20, 2003 - 02:51 pm

    I just learned that the caduceus was the symbol of Asclepius, and the followers of Hippocrates borrowed it. It is said that Asclepius was born by means of a Caesarean section performed by his father. At that time, Caesarean sections were performed on dead women in an effort to save the child. I wonder what kind of anaesthesia was used when they started performing Caesarean sections on live women? Hypnosis perhaps? I had three Caesarean babies and certainly wouldn't want a C section performed without the benefit of anaesthesia.

    ASCLEPIUS

    ASCLEPIUS

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 20, 2003 - 03:46 pm

    THE HIPPOCRATIC OATH

    Diane Church
    May 20, 2003 - 03:59 pm
    Thanks, Robby, for the invitation to this discussion. Natural and holistic health care are so important to me, although I seldom find qualified professionals to provide it.

    Even vets, to my surprise, seem more and more to fall into the same non-holistic, drug-oriented style of treating. I sympathize with georgehd's experience. We have a cat who, at the relative young age of 12, started wasting away at an alarming rate. He no longer ate although he would race me to his bowl at feeding times to see what dinner would be. But he wouldn't eat. I took this very precious little guy to two respected vets in our area and, after a lot of expensive testing, announced that his kidneys were failing. When I asked why, they just said he must be prematurely aging. I thought and thought about what could be wrong (neither vet convinced me that they were on track) and felt it must have something to do with the fact that this little guy used to be an in and outdoor cat with plenty of access to his own freshly-caught, raw food and that his body must be craving it. Both vets denied that this could be the case.

    I bought some fresh, raw chicken liver and that little kitty just about tore it out of my hands. He is now 15, healthy as I could hope for, and nicely filled out. And still gets raw chicken liver every couple of weeks.

    Sorry to be so lengthy on this one thing but I think it is an unfortunate example of the kind of lack of well-rounded thinking that goes on in today's medical fields. It grieves me deeply when I hear of promising discoveries of healing successes in other treatment modes and then to have them immediately discounted without any curiosity or interest. Until the facts can no longer be denied. Look at Atkins.

    Speaking of Hippocrates, I frequently run into his quotes, one of my favorites of which says something like ... if all the prescription drugs were to be dumped to the bottom of the ocean, so much the better for mankind, so much the worse for the fish. Jeepers! - even in those days!

    Mal, I am so sorry for your terrifying experiences. And in the name of science!

    Looking forward to this discussion. Thanks again, Robby.

    Annie3
    May 20, 2003 - 04:04 pm
    Diane that was some sleuthing to find out what your dear cat needed and to have it do the trick, what a wonderful thing to happen. I had to laugh at your Hippocrates paraphrasing. I enjoyed your post.

    Diane Church
    May 20, 2003 - 04:10 pm
    Why thanks, Annie! You make me feel right at home.

    I like your use of the term "sleuthing" because, in retrospect, that's what I've had to do a number of times, most often to protect my husband from his doctors. It's crazy out there.

    I'm just about to go over to Amazon to see if they have a copy of this portion of the Durants' work. My, what an achievement this was. I saw a documentary on them years ago and they did make quite a team. I mainly seem to remember that Ariel rollerskated a lot. Funny the things we remember as compared to the things we forget!

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 20, 2003 - 05:10 pm
    Welcome to our family here, Diane. We have a wonderful time together. We sometimes kid around and sometimes our postings are on the light side but always underneath is our serious interest in the progress of Mankind. If you do not have the book, just check the Heading regularly. The GREEN quotes are changed periodically and help you to see just where Durant is.

    We look forward to your continued participation. Bring your friends with you.

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 20, 2003 - 05:30 pm
    Durant continues:--

    "Secular medicine, in fifth-century Greece, took form in four great schools -- at Cos and Cnidus in Asia Minor, at Crotona in Italy, and in Sicily.

    "At Acragas Empedocles, half philosopher and half miracle man, shared medical honors with the rational practitioner Acron. As far back as 520 we read of the physician Democedes, who, born at Crotona, practiced medicine in Aegina, Athens, Samos, and Susa, cured Darius and Queen Atossa, and returned to spend his last days in the city of his birth

    "At Crotona, too, the Pythagorean school produced the most famous of Greek physicians before Hippocrates. Alcmaeon has been called the real father of Greek medicine, but he is clearly a late name in a long line of secular medicos whose origin is lost beyond the horizons of history. Early in the fifth century he published a work On Nature (peri physeos) -- the usual title, in Greece, for a general discussion of natural science. He, first of the Greeks, so far as we know, located the optic nerve and the Eustachian tubes, dissected animals, explained the physiology of sleep, recognized the brain as the central organ of thought, and defined health Pythagoreanly as a harmony of the parts of the body.

    "At Cnidus the dominating figure was Euryphron, who composed a medical summary known as the Cnidian Sentences, explained pleurisy as a disease of the lungs, ascribed many illnesses to constipation, and became famous for his success as an obstetrician.

    "An unmerry war raged between the school of Cos and Cnidus, for the Cnidians, disliking Hippocrates' penchant for basing 'prognosis' upon general pathology, insisted upon a careful classification of each ailment, and a treatment of it on specific lines.

    "In the end, by a kind of philosophical justice, many of the Cnidian writings found their way into the Hippocratic Collection."

    And so it appears that even 2,500 years ago we not only had physicians but medical schools -- schools which housed not only practitioners but "research scientists" who delved into the body and came up with theories -- theories of such diseases as pleurisy, theories of sleep, and theories of the purpose of that magnificent organ, the brain. And then, not being satisfied with observing and theorizing, they wrote detailed medical tomes.

    One wonders how complete is the curriculum of modern day medical schools. More than one physician has told me that most medical schools do not have courses on nutrition, for instance.

    Your comments, please, on the subject of medical schools as well as other thoughts inspired by Durant's comments above?

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 20, 2003 - 06:25 pm
    Click HERE for a very interesting link explaining what education is necessary to be a physician.

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 21, 2003 - 03:22 am
    Here is a copy of the MODERN HIPPOCRATIC OATH as compared to the one taken in Ancient Greece. In your opinion, do the physicians of our day follow this oath?

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 21, 2003 - 06:00 am

    I think a medical major at the college level should be offered. Courses in Anatomy, Genetics, Biology, Organic Chemistry, Pharmaceuticals, Nutrition, and especially Psychology should be required at that level. I think Psychology courses are very necessary for anyone who wants to become an M.D., with an emphasis on self-analysis, as well as courses that give the future doctor an idea how people tick mentally. The mind is a hugely important factor when it comes to being sick or well and recovery and prevention of illness, both for patient and doctor, and it would be very beneficial if all doctors understood this.

    To me only a four year period for the study of medicine followed by residency at a hospital is woefully inadequate. I'd never have dreamed of playing a piano concerto without the foundation of years and years of study before I went up on the stage and sat down at that piano and played for an exam, not to mention learning, practicing and singing those difficult operatic arias, for my final college exams. I had studied music for over ten years, both privately and at a conservatory, before I ever entered college to major in music.

    I've seen very few doctors in the past twelve years. Of them, one was an uptight, snobbish orthopedist at Duke Hospital who appeared to have forgotten a good deal about what he pledged when he took the Hippocratic Oath. I went to an orthopedist once who told he didn't know what would "do me in", the badly worn disks on my spine, my leg, my foot, my displaced internal organs, or several other things he mentioned. What would Hippocrates have thought about that?

    Another is a dermatologist, a young woman who came into the examining room one time carrying her eighteen month old little boy on her hip. She had a nanny problem, so took her child to the office. When he became fussy and rebelled against the receptionist who was watching him, the doctor brought him right in. Though this doctor was super-cautious and sent me for x-rays to see if I had osteomyelitis, which I knew I didn't have, and a ten minute $500.00 examination by a dermatologist at Duke I had to pay out of my poor pocket, she very much adhered to what she had promised.

    I could name and describe numerous other medical doctors I've known in my life who strayed away from the Hippocratic Oath, but after the soap opera I wrote here yesterday, I won't.

    Good to see you here, Annie. I hope I can live up to your impression of me as a participant here. Diane, I've been interested in alternative medicine for more than thirty years, so will drop by your discussion soon.

    Mal

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 21, 2003 - 07:03 am

    One more thing. After I passed the critical point when I had polio and it was determined I wasn't going to die, the doctor came in and told the adults in my room in front of me that I wouldn't live to be 18, and that if I did I'd be a helpless cripple. What was that doctor thinking? Did he have any conception of what that remark did to the mind of a terribly ill, frightened seven year old child?

    Mal

    Bubble
    May 21, 2003 - 07:39 am
    This reminds me of a doctor who was conducting an examination on my husband for pain in the groin, while a technician was repairing her printer in the same examination room. The doctor was more interested in the commentaries by the technician than how my husband was answering her questions. Bubble

    georgehd
    May 21, 2003 - 08:22 am
    I have to add this doctor story. I was in Florida for a prostate exam and biopsy. While in the waiting room, I could hear the doctor coughing a lot and sounding sick. He came in to see me, coughed a little, covered his mouth with his right hand, and then proceeded to hold out his right hand for me to shake. I declined. I could tell other horror stories about medical practice but as I said earlier one must be one's own advocate and if in the hospital watch what is going on if possible. Unfortunately as we age, we also tend to see the doctor more and more (except for Robby).

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 21, 2003 - 05:53 pm
    "In the collection of treatises anciently ascribed to Hippocrates are textbooks for physicians -- counsels for laymen -- lectures for students -- reports of researches and observations -- clinical records of intereting cases -- and essays by Sophists interested in the scientific or philosophical aspects of medicine.

    "The forty-two clinical records are the only examples of their kind for the next seventeen hundred years, and they set a high standard of honesty by confessing that in sixty per cent of the cases the disease, or the treatment, proved fatal.

    "Of all these compositions only four are by general consent from the pen of Hippocrates -- the 'Aphorisms,' the "Prognostic,' the 'Regimen in Acute Diseases,' and the monograph 'On Wounds in the Head.' The remainder of the Corpus Hippocraticum is by a variety of authors ranging from the fifth to the second century B.C.

    "There is a fair amount of nonsense in the assortment, but probably not more than the future will find in the treatises and histories of the present day. Much of the material is fragmentary, and takes a loose aphoristic form verging now and then upon Heracleitean obscurity.

    "Among the 'Aphorisms' is the famous remark that 'Art is long, but time is fleeting.'"

    Hard to believe that no further examples of clinical records existed for another 1,700 years! Apparently the Dark Ages were truly dark! And even past that, Durant sees much "nonsense" in the treatises of today. Not to mention items in the current news indicating how many hospital fatalities result from the treatments rather than the disease. Mankind progresses!

    Robby

    dapphne
    May 21, 2003 - 05:59 pm
    Robby...... I am SURE that it was a far right winged conspiracy..

    (just kidding)

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 21, 2003 - 06:51 pm

    Quotes by Hippocrates

    Justin
    May 21, 2003 - 10:38 pm
    Doctors today are not saints. In the main, I think they have the interest of the patient in mind when they express an opinion. There are exceptions, of course, and for that reason, if no other, patients should make a serious effort to understand the disease that aflicts them and be able to discuss symptoms and changes in condition with the physician.

    The search for a diagnosis is the most important part of any treatment. Doctor and patient are in that search together. The doctor may see you as a body, an object but that is not necessarily bad. We have to remember that specialists see thousands of patients with the same symptoms and may like other people become bored at times. If the patient becomes actively engaged with the doctor boredom will not be part of the relationship. Doctors love to talk about alternatives in diagnosis. We have all experienced MD's making quick judgements to move to next patient.

    Some of the bad things about medicine today are managed care and clinic practice. Both put pressure on a doctor to see as many patients in a day as possible. That means they have only an allotted time for your treatment. If you exceed that time, they have to make it up elsewhere in a day.

    Insurance tends to put limits on quality medicine. If you are diagnosed with something not on the treatable list the doctor may not be compensated other than by the patient. If the diagnosis is DU,(diagnosis undetermined) the doctor again may not be compensated. You can imagine what happens here. The patient gets a compensatory diagnostic number and the game is played. But the patient is short sheeted.

    There must other problems that Robby is more familiar with and it would be nice to hear about them so we can get the most out of our doctor patient relationships.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 22, 2003 - 03:15 am
    Your "diagnosis" of the problem is most complete, Justin. Let the buyer (patient) beware.

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 22, 2003 - 03:33 am
    "Occasionally prayer is advised as an aid but the page-by-page tone of the collection of treatises is a resolute reliance upon rational therapy. The essay on 'The Sacred Disease' directly attacks the theory that ailments are caused by the gods. All diseases, says the author, have natural causes. 'Men continue to believe in its divine origin because they are at a loss to understand it.'

    "The body, says Hippocrates, is compounded of blood, phlegm, tellow bile, and black bile. Man enjoys the most perfect health in whom these elements are duly proportioned and mingled. Pain is the defect or excess of one 'humor' or its isolation from the rest.

    "The weakest point in Hippocratic medicine was diagnosis. There was, apparently, no taking of the pulse. Fever was judged by simple touch. There is no mention in the Collection of small pox, measles, diphtheria, scarlet fever, or syphilis, and no clear mention of tyhphoid fever. The treatises on 'Regimen' move towards preventive medicine by advocating 'prodiagnosis' -- an attempt to catch the first symptoms of a disease and nip it in the bud.

    "Anatomy and physiology made slow progress in Greece. A little brochure 'On the Heart' describes the ventricles, the great vessels, and their valves. Syennesis of Cyprus and Diogenes of Crete wrote descriptions of the vascular system, and Diogenes knew the significance of the pulse.

    Surgery was still for the most part an unspecialized activity of advanced general practitioners, though the armies had surgeons on their staffs. The little museum at Epidaurus has preserved for us ancient forceps, probes, scalpels, catheters, and specula essentially like those that ae used today. The Hippocratic treatise 'On the Physician' gives detailed directions for the preparation of the operating room, the arrangement of natural and artificial light, the cleanliness of the hands, the care and use of instruments, the position of the patient, and the bandaging of wounds."

    Any comments?

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 22, 2003 - 03:59 am
    Under the heading of "let the buyer beware" in reference to medicine, please note this ARTICLE in this morning's NY Times.

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 22, 2003 - 05:53 am
    Durant concludes his section on medicine with the following:--

    "Greek medicine shows no essential advance upon the medical and surgical knowledge of Egypt a thousand years before the various Fathers of Medicine. In the matter of specialization the Greek development seems to have fallen short of the Egyptian. From another point of view we must hold the Greeks in high esteem, for not until the nineteenth century of our era was any substantial improvement made upon their medical practice or theory.

    "In general, Greek science went as far as could be expected without instruments of observation and precision, and without experimental methods. It would have done better had it not been harassed by religion and discouraged by philosophy.

    "Science stood still for a century while Greece succumbed to the charms of philosophy."

    Comments?

    Robby

    depfran
    May 22, 2003 - 06:09 am
    In those times, Hippocrate brought medicine to a higher level of practice where the value of human life was higher then the value of monetary gain. Today a majority of people believe that the rich benefit from better medical care. Unfortunatly, this is a fact and it goes against the oath of the practice. Where I live, in Quebec, pregnant women from Haiti come here to have their babies and the rich goes to the States for private care!

    Francoise Depelteau

    Bubble
    May 22, 2003 - 06:17 am
    Egypt was so advanced: there are even examples of trepanation to relieve pressure on the brain. I wonder if the Greeks knew of that procedure or if it was lost until modern times.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 22, 2003 - 07:16 am
    You bring up a good point, Francoise. I wonder if the rich Greeks received more and/or better medical care than the poor ones.

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 22, 2003 - 07:31 am

    The New York Times article: It is unknown to some that Bayer is a German-owned corporation and always has been. Cutter is a subsidiary of this corporation. It is the responsibility of executives at Bayer to make sure corrupted medication is not sold and distributed. Whatever blame for this occurrence mentioned in this article should be placed on them.

    I have no way of knowing whether Hippocrates put the value of the patient any higher than medical practitioners of today do. Frankly, I would doubt it. What I do know is that the United States is the only industrialized nation in the world that does not have some form of National Health Care program for all of its citizens. The politicians who rule us are so afraid of anything that resembles Socialism that bills for National Health Care invariably are not passed.

    This leaves the poor who are not able to buy health insurance in the position of taking whatever they can get in the form of care. I will say that I have known some uninsured poor people who received very good care by medical practitioners at hospitals in some of the states where I've lived and were not discriminated against because they were poor. Since I have worked with poor alcoholics and drug addicts, I've had the experience of driving some of them to emergency rooms and staying with them and observing the care they received as patients in or out of the hospital.

    Medicaid steps in and pays the much lower costs for treatment and care of poor people, and doctors and hospitals take whatever financial loss there might be without question. In many ways, it is people in the lower middle class who can afford only minimal health insurance, and fall between the cracks when it comes to help for health care, who suffer. I know. I have been in this category for the past 28 years.

    The divide between rich and poor in the United States creates the situation where the well-to-do can afford a good diet, exercise and the other things which make for good health. The poor can't afford this type of illness prevention and generally know very little about good nutrition and other means of staying well. I consider this a national problem, not an individual one.

    Mal

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 22, 2003 - 10:01 am
    "Evidence of trepanation - deliberately cutting or drilling a hole in the skull - dates back to 3000 BC, and possibly as far back as 10,000 years ago. Trepanation is discussed in medical texts of ancient Greece; Hippocrates (c. 460 to 355 BC) wrote extensively about when, why and how to perform trepanations."

    More HERE

    Diane Church
    May 22, 2003 - 11:54 am
    Fascinating discussion! I wish I had more time to put into it.

    I just had to comment, though, on the fact that Hippocrates included cleanliness of the hands as being important way back then, yet Dr. Schimmelweiss (help, please Robby, on details) died in shame and poverty for daring to suggest that doctors wash their hands between physical examinations. I wonder why it is that some things need to be learned over and over again.

    Mal, good post on health insurance in this country. We must truly be a bunch of wimps to have put up with this sorry excuse of a "system" for so long while other countries with far fewer resources do at least provide care for all their citizens.

    georgehd
    May 22, 2003 - 12:32 pm
    Diane, I cannot defend the health and health insurance system of the US. I can tell you, however, that the British and Canadians whom I know here HATE their systems and in some ways like the American system better. I am afraid that we are living too long, having more protracted diseases that require attention, and ever newer cures and drugs are developed that are expensive and must be paid for. Doctors order more tests so they are not sued and the costs keep rising and rising while real take home pay falls. The matter is made even worse for retired people whose income is probably stagnating or going down.

    The cost of maintaining a health insurance system is huge - just think of the salaries of all those salesmen who cannot do anything to help you get better. Every other month I get solicited for another health insurance plan from AARP. I do not think that lawyers, i.e. the House and Senate, have the knowledge or the political will to change the system.

    It would be great if we could return to Greek times and die before age 25 or 30 (on average). Most of us would succumb to diseases for which there was no cure. Oh for the good old days.

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 22, 2003 - 02:04 pm

    What protracted illnesses, George? The longest protracted illness I ever had was LIFE! You'd see me push off at age 25 before I had that 2nd and 3rd child? You'd have me miss all the fun and trouble I got into after they were all grown up? You want me not to have had the 2nd and 3rd and 4th and 5th careers I've had or the 1 husband I left behind and those numerous, numerous admirers and boyfriends after that? Shame on you!

    Yup, a big part of the doctor's fee goes for malpractice insurance, testing equipment, computers, telephones and office staff and a building to keep them in. Are those tests and all that other stuff really necessary? My Florida doctor had a sign in his office which stated in no uncertain terms that he was not covered by malpractice insurance. Know what? He never was sued.

    Well, I'm going off on my merry own way and experiment more with the Yamaha keyboard which arrived yesterday, while I try to figure out how to make midi files of the glorious music I'm composing and look forward to my BIG BIRTHDAY in early July which will lead to even bigger ones!

    Mal

    Diane Church
    May 22, 2003 - 04:00 pm
    Golly, George, you are the first person I've heard say anything negative about the Canadian health care system - not that it's claimed to be perfect but rather they ask why their system is portrayed so negatively in our media. And, to a person, they say they'd much prefer to keep their system than change to ours. But I haven't met everybody and just go on what I've heard.

    I do feel so strongly that the imposition of an insurance level of profit-takers between the health-givers and the health-takers (well, I could have come up with better terms but you know what I mean) adds a huge amount of cost that contributes in no way to the quality of the care given. A single-payer system, whether it's administered by government or a private agency, would remove that one huge, unnecessary expense. I just wonder why everyone can't see things my way (grin - but really!).

    No, no we don't want to live shorter - we want to live better. Get the junky, toxic additives out of our food, put bike and walkways, nice safe ones along our roads so that people can choose to not use their cars, keep farms and ranches small and locally owned for people who don't grow their own food but encourage all who can to do so, change the emphasis of our health care providers to just that - teach people about wellness and how to achieve and keep it, not just drug the daylights out of everyone. I've heard it said that Americans are the most overly medicated and under nourished people in the world. I believe it.

    I've been hearing about the Australian medical system lately. Now, there is a place that seems to be able to apply common sense to this whole health care topic. In the current "prehypertension" fad, the Australians are being encouraged to emphasize their lifestyle choices, including various forms of stress management (meditation, etc). Isn't that refreshing? Here in the states we're being advised that more than one medication may be adviseable. (snort!)_

    Robby, sorry if this is getting off topic here. My book is on order and I will fall into line when it gets here. In the meantime, I feel so passionately about some of what I said that, well, I just can't shut up!

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 22, 2003 - 05:33 pm
    Go ahead, Diane, speak your piece! The person we worry about is the one who hides in the corner.

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 22, 2003 - 05:55 pm
    And now we come to that topic which keeps high school and college students in philosophy classes arguing and debating back and forth -- often with no conclusion. The GREEN quotes in the Heading will keep us in line with each other - - -

    The Conflict of Philosophy and Religion

    "The age of Pericles resembled our own in the variety and disorder of its thought, and in the challenge that it offered to every traditional standard and belief. No age has ever rivaled that of Pericles in the vigor and exuberance with which they were debated.

    "Every issue that agitates the world today was noised about in ancient Atens, and with such freedom and eagerness that all Greece except its youth was alarmed. Many cities -- above all, Sparta -- forbade the public consideration of philosophical problems, 'on account of the jealousy and strife and profitless discussion to which they give rise.'

    But in Periclean Athens the 'dear delight' of philosophy captured the imagination of the educated classes. Rich men opened their homes and salons in the manner of the French Enlightenment. Philosophers were lionized, and clerver arguments were applauded like sturdy blows at the Olympic games.

    "When, in 432, a war of swords was added to the war of words, the excitement of the Athenian mind became a fever in which all soberness of thought and judgment was consumed. The fever subsided for a time after the martyrdom of Socrates, or was dissipated from Athens to other centers of Greek life. Even Plato, who had known the very height and crisis of it, became exhausted after sixty years of the new game, and envied Egypt the inviolable orthodoxy and quiet stability of its thought.

    "No age until the Renaissance would know such enthusiasm again."

    To think that the issues of our day which we believe to be "new" were hotly discussed 2,500 years ago. And like today, some groups tried to prevent the discussion of these issues -- the reason given that they created strife.

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 22, 2003 - 06:36 pm
    What is Philosophy? Here is the ANSWER in minute detail!

    Robby

    Éloïse De Pelteau
    May 22, 2003 - 06:54 pm
    "Golly, George, you are the first person I've heard say anything negative about the Canadian health care system

    Diane - Without our Canadian health care system, I think my life might be shorter than I expect it to be now. Let me explain, our system has faults in some areas it's true, but we shouldn't lump all of it together as one big mistake. If I look at the benefits we get from it I think we are better off than Americans in that respect. It is free for a start for those who are not working. In the past 50 years I have received regular medical check ups, have had tests done many many times, been xrayed, scanned, been in a cast and hospitalized, all for free. If I am well today, I am certain it is in part because of our health care system with a good part because of my own initiative.

    I never felt I needed health insurence because I am fortunate to be healthy I guess. Health professionnals should not be blamed if something goes wrong, we do have the responsability for avoiding excesses in food and drink, for being aware of our body's weak spots. The internet gives so much information we need to keep well. I search the net if I want to verify a treatment recommended by my doctor, and even her diagnostic if I feel unsure of it.

    Age will catch up with me sooner or later, but in the meantime, I want to be as well as I possibly can for a long time to come.

    Eloïse

    georgehd
    May 22, 2003 - 08:31 pm
    I hope that none of you felt that I was pro the US health system; if so I wrote my thoughts badly. I will be with some Aussie friends tomorrow and will ask about their health program. The criticisms I have heard about Canada have mainly to do with long waits for surgery (I assume elective surgery). My wife's doctor is from Toronto and needs knee surgery but cannot get it any time soon. I have obviously touched a hot button for all of us and wonder whether SeniorNet can exert any political muscle (sorry Robby but Democracy did originate in Greece I think). By the way, our doctor here who is from Scotland thinks that Americans are over medicated but she has a difficult time convincing them of that.

    Oh I forgot one of my pet peeves - drug company advertising. Why do they have to advertise a perscription drug that a doctor is supposed to recommend? How many free samples are given to doctors who then give them to patients?

    The conflict of Religion and Philosophy - now there is a topic that should elicit many posts. Will read that tonight.

    Justin
    May 22, 2003 - 11:10 pm
    Here it is again, the same old topic- religion and philosophy in conflict. One is concerned with superstitious ideas that some of us know are not true. The other is concerned with ideas that most of us know may or may not be true. One seeks the truth the other has found the truth.

    In order to say that these fields are in conflict, one must be willing to mix the two. I'm not willing to do that. Religion is in one sphere of life and philosophy is in another sphere of life. They are separate and distinct entities that no where touch.

    I am not willing to say St Augustine, or Thomas Acquinas are philosphers. They are religious practitioners who seek to justify their ideas. They concern themselves not with " does God exist" but rather with "how can one love God more while sinning so often".

    Empedocles , is a worthy example of an early Greek philosopher. He admitted to his friends that he was God. He saw himself as a friend of Appollo. He claimed supernatural powers. He was an eclectic who saw wisdom in every system.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 23, 2003 - 04:04 am
    "Plato was the culmination of a development that began with Parmenides. He played Hegel to Parmenides' Kant. Though he scattered condemnations lavishly, he never ceased to reverence his metaphysical father. The mysterious problem of knowledge, the distinction between noumenon and phenomenon, between the unseen real and the unreal seen, was flung into the caldron of European thought, and was to boil or simmer there through Greek and medieval days until, in Kant, it would explode again in a philosophical revolution."

    "Noumenon" and "phenomenon?" Hegel? Kant? Perhaps someone will help us "simple" people to understand in down-to-earth words who these people were and what this is all about. And why is "knowledge" a problem?

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 23, 2003 - 05:17 am

    Noumenon: In the philosophy of Kant, an object, such as the soul, that cannot be known through perception, although its existence can be demonstrated.



    Phenomenon: In Philosophy: That which appears real to the mind, regardless of whether its underlying existence is proved or its nature understood. In Kantian philosophy, Phenomenon means the appearance of an object to the mind as opposed to its existence in and of itself, independent of the mind. In Physics Phenomenon means an observable event.




    Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel 1770-1831 was a German philosopher who proposed that truth is reached by a continuing dialectic. Dialectic is the process especially associated with Hegel of arriving at the truth by stating a thesis, developing a contradictory antithesis, and combining and resolving them into a coherent synthesis. It was Hegel's critical method for the investigation of this process. It was also Plato's method.



    Immanuel Kant 1724-1804 was a German idealist philosopher who argued that reason is the means by which the phenomena of experience are translated into understanding.

    Is Kant saying the process of understanding is through reason alone? How is this done? Does he eliminate Hegel's idea that the truth arrived at by first arguing a thesis ( which my dictionary says is a hypothetical proposition, especially one put forth without proof ) and then arguing the antithesis ( the opposite of the thesis ) to reach a synthesis ( reasoning from the general to the particular; logical deduction )? To me Hegel's method implies that a synthesis could be the exact opposite of the original premise or a combination of the two ( thesis and antithesis ).

    How does Kant's emphasis on reason differ from this? Is Hegel saying reason alone without proof is an unreliable source of the truth? Hegel's method sounds much more scientific than Kant's. I mean the idea of hypothesis, theory and proof. But how the heck do I know? Guess I'd better try and find out.

    Mal

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 23, 2003 - 05:27 am

    Boy, were those Ancient Greeks smart!

    Mal

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 23, 2003 - 06:35 am
    Come now, I will tell thee - and do thou hearken to my
    saying and carry it away - the only two ways of search that
    can be thought of. The first, namely, that It is, and that it is
    impossible for anything not to be, is the way of. conviction,
    for truth is its companion.. The other, namely, that It is not,
    and that something must needs not be, - that, I tell thee, is a
    wholly untrustworthy path. For you cannot know what is
    not - that is impossible - nor utter it;

    For it is the same thing that can be thought and that can be.

    It needs must be that what can be thought and spoken of is;
    for it is possible for it to be, and it is not possible for what is
    nothing to be. This is what I bid thee ponder. I hold thee
    back from this first way of inquiry, and from this other also,
    upon which mortals knowing naught wander in two minds; for
    hesitation guides the wandering thought in their breasts, so that
    they are borne along stupefied like men deaf and blind.
    Undiscerning crowds, in whose eyes the same thing and not the
    same is and is not, and all things travel in opposite directions !





    For this shall never be proved, that the things that are not
    are; and do thou restrain thy thought from this way of inquiry.
    Nor let habit force thee to cast a wandering eye upon this
    devious track, or to turn thither thy resounding ear or thy
    tongue; but do thou judge the subtle refutation of their
    discourse uttered by me.





    One path only is left for us to
    speak of, namely, that It is. In it are very many tokens that
    what is, is uncreated and indestructible, alone, complete,
    immovable and without end. Nor was it ever, nor will it be; for
    now it is, all at once, a continuous one. For what kind of origin
    for it. will you look for? In what way and from what source
    could it have drawn its increase? I shall not let thee say nor
    think that it came from what is not; for it can neither be
    thought nor uttered that what is not is
    nothing, what need could have made it arise later rather than
    sooner? Therefore must it either be altogether or be not at
    all. Nor will the force of truth suffer aught to arise besides
    itself from that which in any way is.


    Click HERE for the complete poem.

    Bubble
    May 23, 2003 - 06:39 am
    Mmmmmm...Mal, I am thoroughly lost now!
    Bubble

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 23, 2003 - 06:45 am

    This is what Parmenides is saying in the above poem:

    The Parmenidean Paths of Inquiry

    1. The Way of Objective Truth: Necessarily, all possibilities exist. Consistent, Coherent

    2. The Unthinkable Way: Necessarily, no possibilities exist. Consistent, Incoherent

    3. The Way of Subjective Belief: Some possibilities exist, some do not. Inconsistent, Incoherent

    Parmenides says #2 and #3 are not the way to find the truth; that only #1 will lead to the truth. By eliminating #2 and #3, he is eliminating two possible ways of argument and inquiry, thus the comparison with Kant who, as I understand it, says Reason is the only way to find truth and that proof is not needed. In my opinion, proof that something is true is necessary, and truth can only be found by examining all possibilities, whether they appear possible or impossible.

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 23, 2003 - 07:16 am

    Plato's Method



    "Our knowledge of Plato comes through his writings but it is fair to assume that these reflect the method of teaching at his famous Academy, the first school for philosophy in Athens.



    "Most of Plato's 'Dialogues" use the Socratic method, sometimes called the Method of Dialectic, sometimes the Elenchus. A question is put - usually by Socrates. What is piety? What is justice? The answer offered by the respondent is generally an attempted definition which is then refuted. Socrates proceeds to refute successive attempts to define the concept in an attempt to achieve a satisfactory definition and hence true understanding of a universal truth.



    "Plato conceived a hierarchy of thinking and the level of understanding each sort of thinking could achieve. Opinion could only assist in understanding of the visible world. True knowledge of the universal forms could only be achieved through the higher reasoning process of the dialectic."



    After reading this, it is easy to see why Durant compared Plato with Hegel.

    georgehd
    May 23, 2003 - 08:22 am
    Mal, your posts are fantastic - a real education. But I have to add that the study of philosophy makes my brain turn to mush. I find it very difficult to follow the definitions and then the arguments arising from those definitions. It has always seemed to me that philosophers may know in advance what they believe and then set out to prove what they believe is in fact true.

    In reading Dante's Inferno I have been struck by some of Ciardi's (and Dante's) comments that apply to this discussion.

    "With them Dante enters the Citadel of Human Reason and sees before his eyes the Master of Souls of Pagan Antiquity gathered on a green, and illuminated by the radiance of Human Reason. This is the highest state man can achieve without God, and the glory of it dazzles Dante, but he know also that it is nothing compared to the glory of God." The Citadel represents philosophy.

    It is also interesting to me that Philosophy and Religion are areas of human thought that cannot be scientifically proven. Therefore there is bound to be conflict.

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 23, 2003 - 09:05 am

    George, there have been and are philosophers who would disagree with Dante that the Citadel is "second best". What were the philosophers doing in the Inferno? Anti-religion or something?

    Plato has been accused of a priori thinking. Did the accusers mean "Proceeding from a known or assumed cause to a necessarily related effect; deductive"? Or "Based on a hypothesis or theory rather than on experiment or experience"? Or "Made before or without examination; not supported by factual study"?

    Hours and hours of dialectic arguing would make me dizzy. I felt the same way when I found out about the Pilpul.

    Mal

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 23, 2003 - 02:37 pm
    In working with patients I use various psychotherapeutic techniques. One is cognitive-behavioral therapy. The patient is making his decisions on an emotional basis, is getting himself into all sorts of hot water, and can't understand why. Instead of STATING a new method, I might ASK "is it possible that" so and so is the situation. "The Way of Objective Truth -- Necessarily, all possibilitis exist. Consistent, Coherent."

    Reason is used to find the way. All possibilities leads to the truth. Whenever the question asked is "is it possible," the answer must always be "yes." Everything is possible. In the process of doing this the patient often contradicts himself because heretofore he had been leading his life on an emotional basis.

    Those with the disease of alcoholism often find their emotional growth brought to a halt at the time they moved into heavy drinking and must learn in the process of recovery to put their intellect over their emotion or as Alcoholics Anonymous puts it -- "put their I over their E." AA has many pithy phrases which tend to be called platitudes but are the resulting wisdom of years of alcoholic misery. They take every thing which was expressed in philosophical language above and put it in three words == "Think It Through."

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 23, 2003 - 03:02 pm
    "Parmenides says all things are one, and never change. He speaks of the One as the universe. At times he identifies Being with Thought, and sings, 'One thing are Thinking and Being,' as if to say that for us things exist only in so far as we are conscious of them.

    Beginning and end, birth and death, formation and destruction, are of forms only. The One Real never begins and never ends. There is no Becoming, there is only Being.

    >"Motion, too, is unreal. It assumes the passage of something from where it is to where there is nothing, or empty space. Empty space, Not Being, cannot be. There is no void. The One fills every nook and cranny of the world, and is forever at rest."

    You and I are One?

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 23, 2003 - 03:51 pm
    "As an exercise in perversity, and to amuse his youth, Zeno published a book of paradoxes, of which nine have come down to us.

    Any body, in order to move to point A, much reach B, the middle of its course toward A.
    To arrive at B it much reach C, the middle of its course toward B.
    And so on to infinity.
    Since an infinity of time would be required for this infinite series of motions, the motion of any body to any point is impossible in a finite time.

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 23, 2003 - 05:15 pm

    Here's one ex-boozer who is "thinking it through." If we agree with Parmenides that the only method to achieve the truth is #1 -- The Way of Objective Truth: "All possibilities exist", then, yes, Robby, you and we are one.

    If we say, "Well, by doing this we have eliminated and ignored other methods of determining possibilities like 'The Unthinkable Way', or no possibilities exist, and 'The Way of Subjective Belief': Some possibilities exist, some do not, we have no way of truly knowing what all the possibilities are, and, no, Robby, you and we are not one."

    Parmenides said, "Whatever can be spoken or thought of necessarily is, since it is possible for it to be, but it is not possible for nothing to be." Is that true? It’s not possible for nothing to be? Interesting, isn't it, that the Ancient Greeks had no symbol for zero?

    Parmenides also said, "According to the union within each person of disparate body parts, thus does mind emerge in humans. For it is the composition of body parts which does the thinking, and Thought (since it defines the plenum) is the same in each and every human." My brain doesn’t think all by itself, and doesn't have a single different idea from all the rest of you?

    I find plenty of things to disagree with as far as Parmenides’ hypotheses were concerned. Shall we have a dialectic discussion about them?

    Zeno was a show-off. Stand still and go nowhere. Move and go nowhere. Somebody please tell me if there are any sort of scientific philosophies which agree with what this oh-so-superior guy said.

    Mal

    Fifi le Beau
    May 23, 2003 - 06:15 pm
    Earlier this year the philosophical war between some analysts in the CIA and the Department of Defense and its intelligence arm the DIA met in Langley where DIA presented their case for a connection between Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein. The CIA Near East and South Asian division discounted a connection. We know that Rumsfeld and DOD won that argument. Below some quotes from the meeting and interviews with some of the participants.

    There are knowns, known unknowns, and unknown unknowns. I think this construct is just powerful. The unknown unknowns. We do not even know we don't know them.........Donald Rumsfeld

    Build a hypotheses and see if the data can support it.....Rumsfeld

    Intelligence work is often not about evidence, but about the absence of evidence.....George Tenet (aides also attribute this quote to Rumsfeld)

    We're moving people away from linear thinking........George Tenet CIA

    In the meeting the hawks of Defense were agressive in their examination of raw data supplied by the CIA. They used hypotheses driven analysis and tried to make the raw data fit their hypotheses.

    Links full of ambiguous evidence is an occupational hazzard.... Robert Gates former CIA head.

    It can be risky and dangerous if you have policy makers who don't want to hear more than one opinion. Neither of the Presidents Bush liked to be faced with choices.........Angelo Codevilla former intelligence committee staff

    A danger of straying too far from data........Codevilla

    At the time of these interviews Rumsfeld was busy moving thousands of troops to surround Iraq. The decision had been made long before this debate to go to war, but they wanted the CIA head to accept their hypotheses, and he did. Those opposing the Rumsfeld theory of a close working relationship between Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein, had already made their case against the connection to Iraq, and I don't have direct quotes from them. They both had the same evidence, and the mid east heads at CIA chose the direct evidence approach, and Rumsfeld choose the indirect evidence with unknown, unknowns thrown in where no evidence existed.

    I hope this is not too political for this forum, but it is current and seems to show the differences between Parmenides and Plato, and also two departments of our government.

    I prefer Parmenides simple "It is" and "It is not" to Rumsfelds "Known unknowns".

    I am eating an apple.

    Parmenides would say, "It is an apple."

    Rumsfeld would say, "It is not an apple", it's one of those known, unknowns.

    I agree with Parmenides "You cannot know what is not. That is impossible.

    ......

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 23, 2003 - 06:28 pm

    First you have to determine if what you think is not is really "not", or if it only has the appearance of being something that is not. Most scientists would have been deterred in the hypothesis stage if they had not believed they could discover and explain things which were accepted as being something that is not. Parmenides' hypothesis that what is is, and what is not is not, is too white and black for me.

    Mal

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 23, 2003 - 06:57 pm
    Fifi:--That's intriguing!

    Robby

    Fifi le Beau
    May 23, 2003 - 08:03 pm
    Mal, I should have stated that the use of Parmenides for this particular argument seemed to be appropriate to me. I do not think his argument would fit into all facets of life and science.

    I do think however it is just right for Warlords, who can cause a lot of unnecessary death and destruction justified by manipulation of data to suit their purpose. Rule number one should always apply to those who have the power over life and death.

    A scientist manipulating data might just blow himself up, but rule number one would not apply. If it doesn't kill him, he might consider it though.

    ......

    Justin
    May 23, 2003 - 10:11 pm
    Zeno could not have known that Isaac Newton would come along later and establish three laws of motion that would explain this process contrary to Zeno. But that's life.

    Zeno assumes that motion consists of discreet steps, that the process is discontinuous. Motion, as in motion pictures, appears to be continuous but is made up of discreet photographs each moved at a given rate of speed. Continuous movement here is an illusion and that would seem to describe what Zeno sees. However, the movement of each photograph is not made up of discreet steps. The movement of each piece- each photo is continuous.

    Movement is continuous so long as an unbalanced force is played upon an object. Further the movement of an object will accelerate so long as an unbalanced force is played upon it. That is Newton's second law.

    The first law of motion says that an object will move only if there are forces on it that do not balance.

    The third law says that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

    Justin
    May 23, 2003 - 10:55 pm
    Fifi: Your quotes from the DIA and CIA meeting were very enlightening. They were probably in the news and I missed them first time around. But your summary was outstanding. Thank you.

    I agree, known unknowns and unknown unknowns are a study in the occult. It is one thing to know what we do not know and quite another not to know what we do not know. In addition, to be able to add these unknown quantities into a formula and give the overall result credence is fakery.

    In my middle aged working life I designed econometric models for forecasting new complex products and the economy. Unknowns were a recognized but unmeasurable quantity that often required limits and range estimates to give a model movement and to give a degree of credence to a result. Unknown unknowns existed, I realize, but were neither identifiable nor quantifiable.

    Bubble
    May 24, 2003 - 02:32 am
    For it is the composition of body parts which does the thinking, and Thought (since it defines the plenum) is the same in each and every human. #840



    Do we really all go through the same process when we think? Do we know that?

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 24, 2003 - 03:04 am
    Durant moves us from the "idealists" to the "materialists."

    "As Parmenides' denial of motion and change was a reaction against the fluid and unstable metaphysics of Hereleitus, so his monism was a counterblast to the atomism of the later Pythagoreans. These had developed the number theory of their founder into the doctrine that all things are composed of numbers in the sense of indivisible units.

    "When Philolaus of Thebes added that 'all things take place by necessity and by harmony,' everything was ready for the Atomic school in Greek philosophy.

    "About 435 Leucippus of Miletus came to Elea, and studied under Zeno. There he heard of the number atomism of the Pythagoreans, for Zeno had aimed some of his subtlest paradoxes at this doctrine of plurality. Of his direct teaching only one fragment remains: 'All things occur for a reason, and of necessity.' In this way he hoped to make motion theoretically possible as well as sensibly actual.

    "The universe, said Leucippus, contains atoms and space and nothing else. Atoms tumbling about in a vortex fall by necessity into the first forms of all things, like attaching itself to like. In this way arose the planets and the stars.

    "All things, even the human soul, are composed of atoms."

    I wonder if Einstein read the history of the Ancient Greeks.

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 24, 2003 - 08:35 am

    It is thought that Democritus was a pupil of Leucippus, where this time 'pupil' really does have its standard meaning. Together they are considered as the joint founders of Atomism. Leucippus stated that atoms are:-

    ... imperceptible, individual particles that differ only in shape and position.

    The mixing of these particles gives rise to the world we experience. The reason that some early writers did not believe in the existence of Leucippus seems to be because his views and those of Democritus became completely entwined. Quite soon the whole became attributed to Democritus who was the more famous of the pair. It seems likely that Democritus as a pupil of Leucippus, developed the ideas of his teacher but it is quite beyond us to disentangle the contributions of each to this important doctrine.

    Two works, almost certainly written by Leucippus, are The Great World System and On the Mind. The first of these is attributed to Leucippus by Theophrastus (about 372 BC - 287 BC) was a pupil of Aristotle who had studied at Athens under Aristotle, Theophrastus became head of the Lyceum in Athens after Aristotle in 323 BC. He was in a position to be able to distinguish the works of Leucippus from those of Democritus and we shall describe his views on this matter.

    Theophrastus claimed that the basic ideas of atomism were present in the philosophy of Leucippus according to which:-

    Both matter and void have real existence. The constituents of matter are elements infinite in number and always in motion, with an infinite variety of shapes, completely solid in composition.

    According to Leucippus in The Great World System is a creation of worlds by agglomerations of atoms by chance collisions. There is then differentiation with the smaller atoms being sent off into the infinity of space while the rest form into a spherical structure with the larger atoms at the centre and the smaller atoms further away from the center.

    . From the treatise On the Mind we have the only quotation of the words of Leucippus which have survived. In this work he writes (see for example:-

    Nothing happens in vain, but everything from reason and of necessity.

    Leucippus also contributed to the method of exhaustion.

    MORE.

    georgehd
    May 24, 2003 - 08:37 am
    Einstein was classically schooled in Europe; I am sure that he had read Greek and Roman History. The work of Democritus was undoubtedly known to any scientifically trained person (was Einstein mathematically or scientifically trained - cannot remember)? Even I taught the work of Democritus to my 9th grade physical science classes.

    The big difference of course is that the Greeks engaged in thought experiments to arrive at scientific 'knowledge'. In this sense they were like the philosophers who also engaged in 'thought' analysis.

    georgehd
    May 24, 2003 - 08:45 am
    Way back around post 825, I mentioned that I would ask some Aussies about their medical system. They LOVE it and believe that it is better than both the American and Canadian systems - also the British system. However, they pointed out that 1. the population is small and 2. the system is changing and may become more like the Canadian system. They were not particularly impressed with the Canadian system. These people have lived in a number of countries including the US. We all agreed that the US system desperately needs to be over hauled but none of us had a solution.

    georgehd
    May 24, 2003 - 08:55 am
    Mal's last post takes you to a University of St. Andrews (Scotland) web site. There are a number of links within that site pertaining to Greek civilization as well as the history of Mathematics. Thanks Mal.

    depfran
    May 24, 2003 - 09:27 am
    Post 838 I agree with this statement "for us things exist only in so far as we are conscious of them". I am in awe before a little baby who first becomes conscious of the existence of his hands and fingers and who gets excited at his trying to move them. Isn't it the beginning of the human conscience? Of the realization of it's existence as an individual separate from his mother. Later hiding his eyes thinking he as disappeared. Or in the first months of life the unexplained (unknown unknows) suffering the baby feels of loosing sight of his mother, wishing to become One with her again and again? That is the mystery of the Oneness and power of Love. To me, philosophy and religion is separate until it becomes One in a conscious and objective realization of body, mind and soul "Thinking and Being". This feeling of Oneness I have come to it's realisation little by little, in deep meditation until the search for the existence of the oneness of the universe was revealed to me. Thus, there is no more duality between philosophy and religion left in my conscience.

    Françoise

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 24, 2003 - 10:03 am

    I see the difference between philosophy and religion to be this:-

    All religions have a god or gods, and most proclaim to be the truth. Philosophy is the search for knowledge and truth without a dependency on a god or gods.

    Mal

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 24, 2003 - 11:40 am
    Francoise:--In reference to the quote "for us things exist only in so far as we are conscious of them".

    Which level of consciousness are you talking about? On more than one occasion it has been shown that if a person is asked the license plate numbers of the cars he has just passed, he is unable to do so (conscious mind) but if hypnotized, can often give them (subconscious mind).

    Do things exist if we do not remember them (be consciously aware of them)?

    Robby

    HubertPaul
    May 24, 2003 - 03:03 pm
    Swedenborg ( Swedish mystic, philosopher, theologian, and scientist,) :

    “Without the utmost devotion to the Supreme Being, the Origin of all things, no one can be a complete and truly erudite philosopher. Veneration for the Infinite Being can never be separated from philosophy.”

    Philosophy is not for those who settle everything by the evidence of their senses, who must see reality with their eyes and touch it with their hands.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 24, 2003 - 03:18 pm
    "Democritus begins with a critique of the senses. For practical purposes we may trust them, but the moment we begin to analyze their evidence we find ourselves taking away from the external world layer after layer of the color, temperature, flavor, savor, sweetness, bitterness, and sound that the senses lay upon it.

    "These 'secondary qualities' are in ourselves or in the total process of perception, not in the objective thing. In an earless world a falling forest would make no noise, and the ocean, however angry, would nmever roar. 'By convention (nomos) sweet is sweet, bitter is bitter, hot is hot, cold is cold, color is color. But in truth there are only atoms and the void.

    "Hence the senses give us only obscure knowledge, or opinion. Genuine knowledge comes only by investigation and thought.

    "Verily, we know nothing. Truth is buried deep."
    "We know nothing for certain, but only the changes produced in our body by the forces that impinge upon it."
    "All sensations are due to atoms discharged by the object and falling upon our sense organs."
    "All senses are forms of touch."

    The world is merely what we perceive it to be?

    Robby

    HubertPaul
    May 24, 2003 - 09:17 pm
     
    There was a young fellow named Todd 
    Who said,”“It’s exceedingly odd 
    To think that this tree 
    Should continue to be 
    When there’s no one above in the Quad.” 
    


    The reply:

     
    There is nothing especially odd; 
    I am always about in the Quad. 
    And that’s why this tree 
    Can continue to be 
    When observed by 
    Yours faithfully, God. 
    


    in the: The Triple Abyss, by Warwick Fairfix. (refers to Oxford.)

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 24, 2003 - 10:13 pm

    Each one of us here comes in with his or her own background, attitudes, religion and philosophy or no religion or philosophy. This is not a marketplace where we pitch what we believe in the hopes that someone will buy it. Nor is it a school like the ones Ancient Greek philosophers founded where theses and antitheses were tossed back and forth. I don't know about anyone else, but for me this forum is a place to try and learn what ancient people concluded and investigate how they lived before we were even thought of.

    Mal

    Justin
    May 24, 2003 - 11:57 pm
    Yes indeed, Mal and with one additional step, that of relating the experience of the ancients to contemporary experience. It is important, I think, to compare civilizations as well as the elements of civilization.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 25, 2003 - 03:53 am
    Democritus continues his theories:--

    "The fine atoms that constitute the soul are the noblest and most wonderful part of the body. The wise man will cultivate thought -- will free himself from passion, superstition, and fear -- and will seek in contemplation and understanding the modest happiness available to human life. A man must become accustomed to finding within himself the sources of his enjoyment.

    Culture is better than riches. No power and no treasure can outweigh the extension of our knowledge. Happiness is fitful, and sensual pleasure affords only a brief satisfaction. One comes to a more lasting content by acquiring peace and serenity of soul (ataraxia) -- good cheer (euthumia) -- moderation (metriotes) -- and a certain order and symmetry of life (biou symmetria).

    We may learn much from the animals -- spining from the spider -- building from the swallow -- singing from the nightingale and swan. But strength of body is nobility only in beasts of burden. Strength of character is nobility in man.

    Democritus raises upon his scandalous metaphysics a most presentable ethic. Good actions should be done not out of compulsion but from conviction -- not from hope of reward, but for their own sake. A man should feel more shame in doing evil before himself than before all the world."

    Finding within himself the sources of his enjoyment? Culture is better than riches? Some one (I can't remember who) said: "I've been rich and I've been poor -- and rich is better."

    Robby

    Éloïse De Pelteau
    May 25, 2003 - 04:47 am
    Bert, I have enjoyed your posts in another forum, I liked the poem you quoted. It is good to have other points of view. Perhaps I should look up Quad in the dictionary.

    Françoise, good post. We don't have an opportunity to speak English together do we?

    Eloïse

    Ann Alden
    May 25, 2003 - 06:52 am
    For those of you who are interested in the Middle East, we are starting a new book discussion on June 9th about an American family's search for their old friends in Iran. Very well written with sights, sounds,smells,laughter and tears, I think anyone would enjoy this book. Searching For Hassan

    depfran
    May 25, 2003 - 06:58 am
    Robert. consciousness is something so vast that we could debate the subject for centuries still, depending on the evolution of the science. There is progress in the field. There was a discovery made concerning Buddhist and their brain and it was shown that the right frontal side of their brain became enlightened and remained enlightened even after the meditation. That part of the brain is said to bring positive feelings. What I was referring to in the statement about being conscious is an awareness towards the subtle atoms vibrating within and around us, and that, most of us are unaware of until the desire is there to go deeper in the knowledge of oneself to perceive it. There another dimension exist and it is a unifying experience between the self and the universe. This is very ancient knowledge I am talking about and it comes from the East.

    Françoise

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 25, 2003 - 07:08 am
    Thank you, Ann, for letting us know about this new book discussion. I clicked onto your link, read the introduction, and believe it will be an interesting and enlightening discussion.

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 25, 2003 - 07:17 am
    Francoise:--In your comment about "consciousness being aware of subtle atoms vibraing within us" you appear to be agreeing with the Ancient Greek Materialist theory that "fine atoms constitute the soul." Am I correct?

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 25, 2003 - 08:06 am

    Eloise, "Quad" means quadrangle. At many universities and colleges, mine included, four buildings, classrooms or dormitories, are placed together in the shape of a square with a kind of courtyard in the middle. This is known as the Quadrangle or Quad. I believe the author of the poem Hubert posted was referring to a quadrangle at Oxford.



    After carefully examining and choosing to discard the religion and certain ideas of a philosophic nature which were put on me by my family as a child, I made a very long search of other religions and philosophies, including Buddhism ( which is considered by some not to be a religion ) and Eastern religions, and the extreme of Atheism, before I settled on a personal philosophy which is comfortable for me. Since it is bits and pieces of many different things as well as ideas of my own, this philosophy of mine has no name or other means of identification, and, Zeus knows, would be impossible to teach or convey to anyone else.

    One result of this search and years of thought is that I have determined ( for myself ) that understanding, and not necessarily acceptance, of things that are different from what I've known, must be based not on emotion but on as much objectivity as I can muster.

    Having used emotion as the basis for my thinking for a very long time, objective thinking is not always easy to come by, and I realize that it is colored by the background and experiences which make me what I am. Regardless, since understanding has been for me a long-time goal, my quest for objectivity will prevail. This, of necessity, must include all the possibilities which are possible and what appears to be no possibilities at all.



    I've never been rich, though I've been close to people who are. I've never been poor enough that I was close to starvation, though I've had to miss many a meal, and not by choice. What I've learned is that it is easier to be creative and to focus on things outside myself when the roof doesn't leak, there are decent shoes on my feet and clothes on my back, and I have money enough to pay for that roof over my head and buy food.

    There have been contented moments when I didn't know how in the world I'd ever come up with money for the rent or my next meal, and there have been contented moments when that worry didn't hang like a Damocles' sword over my head. A certain amount of money makes life easier, that's all.

    Just one question in closing:- How can the "soul" and anything else intangible consist of atoms when, as some would maintain, they don't exist?

    Mal

    HubertPaul
    May 25, 2003 - 09:05 am
    Robby

    What are subtle atoms? Are they smaller than particles? MIND?

    Bert

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 25, 2003 - 09:17 am
    "Idealism offends the senses.

    "Materialism offends the soul.

    "The one explains everything but the world.

    "The other everything but life.

    "To merge these half-truths it was necessary to find some dynamic principle that could mediate between structure and growth, between things and thought.

    "Anaxagoras sought such a principle in a cosmic Mind.

    "Empedocles sought it in the inherent forces that made for evolution.

    "He took very much to heart the notion of transmigration, and announced with poetic sympathy that he had been 'in bygone times a youth, a maiden, and a flowering shrub -- a bird, yes -- and a fish that swims in silence through the deep sea.'

    "He condemned the eating of animal food as a form of cannibalism. Were not these animals the reincarnation of human beings? All men, he believed, had once been gods, but had forfeited their heavenly place by some impurity or violence. He was certain that he felt in his own soul intimations of a prenatal divinity.

    "Convinced of his divine origin, he put golden sandals upon his feet, clothed his body with purple robes, and crowned his head with laurel. He was, as he modestly explained to his countrymen, a favorite of Apollo. Only to his friends did he confess that he was a god.

    "He claimed supernatural powers, performed magic rites, and sought by incantations to wrest from the other world the secrets of human destiny.

    "He offered to cure diseases by the enchantment of his words, and cured so many that the populace half believed his claims."

    As a Clinical Psychologist, I am often called upon to evaluate patients who are brought in by the police due to their erratic actions. I need to be most careful that I don't declare someone psychotic when, in fact, he/she merely has a religious belief. If someone says that he speaks with God, that is not so unusual. Many people speak with God. I might be unfair by stating that he is in need of psychiatric help. But what if he says that he is God? Is that erratic?

    What do you folks think of Empedocles? How do you evaluate him?

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 25, 2003 - 09:29 am
    Theology.—The system of Democritus was altogether antitheistic. But, although he rejected the notion of a deity taking part in the creation or government of the universe, he yielded to popular prejudice so far as to admit the existence of a class of beings, of the same form as men, grander, composed of very subtle atoms, less liable to dissolution, but still mortal, dwelling in the upper regions of air. These beings also manifested themselves to man by means of images in dreams, communicated with him, and sometimes gave him an insight into the future. Some of them were benevolent, others malignant. According to Plutarch, Democritus recognized one god under the form of a fiery sphere, the soul of the world, but this idea is probably of later origin. The popular belief in gods was attributed by Democritus to the desire to explain extraordinary phenomena (thunder, lightning, earthquakes) by reference to superhuman agency.

    MORE

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 25, 2003 - 09:42 am

    My brain-damaged ( head injury ) son has said he often spoke with God. There was an incident when he saw God walking down a rainbow when he was driving his car at night. I wrote a short story about this called "Miracles". The ending of this story has two brothers seated in a car. The one who cannot see God walking down the rainbow says, "Who knows what you see? Who knows what miracles there really are?"

    Some of Empedocles' ideas sound very close to some Eastern religions. His calling himself a god makes me wonder if his ideas had not swelled his head a little. If I were a Clinical Psychologist and Empedocles was referred to me today, I'd accept his religious ideas as normal for him and suggest a kind of therapy which would lead him to question his idea that he was a god.

    Mal

    depfran
    May 25, 2003 - 10:58 am
    I am sorry Robert to say that it is not possible to attach me to any concept here. I could not elaborate on my beliefs that would satisfy me completely. The subject is too vast. Only I can add something about subtle atoms vibrating. Like everything in this universe is living and vibrating so is the energy within us moving and creating a subtle cool breeze. If you put your hand about 12 inches above your head, you may feel a very subtle cool or warm breeze. For some people, it is an experience difficult to feel at first because it is new to them but it is real and it is there. Like atoms and electrons and even smaller particles in the MICROCOSM vibrates, so are the planets and galaxies in the MACROCOSM turn and will go on turning forever. It is a law of nature isn't it?

    Françoise

    Justin
    May 25, 2003 - 01:13 pm
    I think it's very nice of Empedocles to tell us he is God. The nice thing about Empedocles being God is that when people talk to him he returns the compliment.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 25, 2003 - 01:21 pm
    "Empedocles was actually a learned physician fertile in suggestions to medical science, and skilled in the psychology of the medical art. He was a brilliant orator. According to Aristotle, he "invented" the principles of rhetoric, and taught them to Gorgias, who peddled them in Athens. He was an engineer who freed Selinus from pestilence by draining marshes and changing the courses of streams.

    "He was a courageous statesman who, though himself an aristocrat, led a popular revolution against a narrow aristocracy, refused the dictatorship, and established a moderate democracy.

    "He was a poet, and wrote On Nature and On Purifications in such excellent verse that Aristotle and Cicero ranked him high among the poets, and Lucretius complimented him with imitation.

    "Perhaps, after all, he was a god."

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 25, 2003 - 03:52 pm
    On Nature



    All that exists is constructed out of the four traditional roots (rizai): fire, air, earth and water), bonded in various proportions by the force of cohesion (philotes = love) and separated by the force of corruption (neikos = strife).

    The two elemental concepts (Love and Strife) may at first sight seem like early mythic abstractions, but Empedocles employed them as cosmic forces:

    Aristotle understands Empedocles as referring to causal forces of the universe.

    As such they can be compared to the cosmic forces of densification and rarification in Anaximenes.

    Empedocles agrees with Parmenides on two points:

    No object is created out of nothing -- i.e. no conversion of reality from non-reality (a principle called in Latin, creatio ex nihilo) nor is it absolutely destroyed -- i.e. no conversion of reality into non-reality (Latin: destructio ad nihil).

    Instead, there is generation out of the 4 roots and destruction back into the roots.

    The four roots account not only for the construction of objects, but also for our means of perception of them through the principle that like is perceived by like.

    Our faculty of understanding is based on perception, which is itself based on material principles.



    It is difficult to separate the mystical from the rational in Empedocles' fragments.

    His system adopts the Parmenidean concept that there is no such thing as non-reality; therefore Empedocles denies absolute creation and absolute destruction as told in the myths.

    There is only generation from previous existing roots and a breaking down into these roots.

    His system attempts to give a unified account of the sensible universe that Parmenides denied.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 26, 2003 - 04:59 am
    We have all heard the term sophistry and now Durant will tell us (see GREEN quotes in Heading) about the Sophists.

    "It is a reproof to those who think of Greece as synonymous with Athens, that none of the great Hellenic thinkers before Socrates belonged to the city, and only Plato after him. Perhaps Athens would have remained obsurantist and intolerant to the point of stupidity had it not been for the growth of a cosmopolitan trading class, and the coming of the Sophists to Athens.

    "The debates in the Assembly, the trials before the heliaea, and the rising need for the ability to think with the appearance of logic and to speak with clarity and persuasion, conspired with the wealth and curiosity of an imperial society to create a demand for something unknown in Athens before Pericles -- formal higher education in letters, oratory, science, philosophy, and statesmanship.

    "The demand was met at first not by the organization of universities but by wandering scholars who engaged lecture halls, gave there their courses of instruction, and then passed on to other cities to repeat them. Some of these men, like Protagoras, called themselves sophistai -- i.e. teachers of wisdom. The word was accepted as equivalent to our 'university professor,' and bore no derogarory connotation until the conflict between religion and philosophy led to conservative attacks upon the Sophists, and the commercialism of certain of them provoked Plato to darken their name with the imputations of venal sophistry that now cling to it."

    A most interesting thought -- "a rising need for the ability to think." In other words, before that time, the average person had no need to "think." And now along come "wandering minstrels" who do not sing as I heard they did in the Middle Ages but simply spoke to everyone to the point of forcing their audience to "think." Most interesting!!

    Robby

    Bubble
    May 26, 2003 - 05:41 am
    forcing their audience to "think." Most interesting!!



    This is exactly what this discussion is doing to me!

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 26, 2003 - 06:11 am
    "Perhaps the general public entertained a vague dislike for these teachers from their first appearance, since their costly instruction in logic and rhetoric could be bought only by the well to do, and gave these an advantage in trying their cases before the courts.

    "It is true that the more famous Sophists, like most skilled practitioners in any field, charged all that their patrons could be persuaded to pay. This is the final law of prices everywhere. Protagoras and Gorgias, we are told, demanded ten thousand drachmas ($10,000) for the education of a single pupil. But less Sophists were content with reasonably moderate fees."

    So it always comes down to the bottom line! Nothing is free. Those who want to attend or send their children to the better schools have to pay -- and often highly.

    Is the result therefore that poorer people do not learn "how to think?"

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 26, 2003 - 10:21 am

    It's hard for me to picture anyone today paying a wandering philosopher to spout off his or her theories. I suppose there are analogies like lecturers who are paid a bundle for what they say, regardless what it is. TV "philosophers" are paid even more than that. I don't think soapbox philosophers on sidewalks and in parks in places like New York City make much money, though.

    Poor people think, all right, but often can't get over the hurdle of magic, myth and hearsay so they are able to think objectively and logically. Poor people don't have the kind of money that buys education, which could help them leap that hurdle, and provides the time for learning and schooling.

    Mal

    kiwi lady
    May 26, 2003 - 12:09 pm
    Many of the people who fought for freedom, education for their children and many other things we take for granted were uneducated. That is uneducated in the eyes of the world. I believe thinkers exist in all facets of society. Thinkers will educate themselves by reading and learning all they can about the world around them. Thinkers will process this information and then form their own opinions. Some well educated people are not thinkers - you just need to go into the political forums here to realise this! Thinkers often become reformers. One of our greatest Prime Ministers was only educated to the age of 12. He was certainly a thinker and a cultured man. He came from a poor background.

    Carolyn

    Diane Church
    May 26, 2003 - 02:26 pm
    Carolyn - I like the way you differentiate between thinkers and the educated - and point to political discussions for examples! I guess we can always hope that it is possible for an educated person to also be a thinker. Is there not something about much of our educational system that dampens the fires of original thinking?

    georgehd
    May 26, 2003 - 02:42 pm
    I find it difficult to understand or think about the philosophies or natural science of the ancients because I have been exposed to 2000 years of 'progress' in the sciences and this causes me to question the "thought experiments" which allowed the ancients to explain natural phenomena. It is most interesting, however, to see how the ancients predicted much that has proved scientifically accurate. We say that these men thought 'rationally'; yet they also came up with false ideas through rational thought. What does this tell us about rational thought and about philosophy in general?

    As an interesting aside, we have a young Jaimacan man who helps us out in the garden. This man has received very little education and what little he did receive was probably most basic. But the man is smart and willing to learn; he is a rapid learner. His native intelligence was never challenged in school and for that reason his life will probably be limited. A waste of human talent.

    Robby, you point out that parents have to pay for their children's education and the price tag is high. I see the cost of education to parents, from Kindergarten through college, as one of the major problems in the US.

    Carolyn, there is no question in my mind that much elementary teaching in the US does indeed dampen original thinking. The teacher centered classroom is still probably the norm. I was a very good math student in high school. My first college experience with calculus was horrible; the teacher a joke. And I was totally turned off. On the other hand, how many of us have been inspired to greater learning by an excellent teacher? Teachers are undervalued in our country because a price tag cannot be put on their product.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 26, 2003 - 06:10 pm
    "Protagoras, the most renowned of the Sophists, was born in Abdera a generation before Democritus. Plato respected him and described him as a man of high character. In the Platonic dialogue that is named after him Protagoras makes a much better showing than the argumentative young Socrates. Here it is Socrates who talks like a Sophist, and Protagoras who behaves like a gentleman and a philosopher, never losing his temper, never jealous of another's brilliance, never taking the argument too seriously, and never anxious to speak.

    "He admits that he undertakes to teach his pupils prudence in private and public matters, the orderly management of home and famly, the art of rhetoric or persuasive speaking, and the ability to understand, and direct affairs of state. He defends his high fees by sayhing that it is his custom, when a pupil objects to the sum asked, to agree to receive as adquate whatever amount the pupil may name as just in a solemn statement before some sacred shrine -- a rash procedure for a teacher who doubted the existence of the gods."

    Robby

    kiwi lady
    May 26, 2003 - 06:39 pm
    Mals computer has blown up because of a power outage (probably a big surge). Her grandson informed us her son is buying her a brand new top of the line PC and it will be delivered to her door by the end of the week. I know she will be lost without her beloved PC which is also her window to the world. I am however envious of her present! She may come in via grandson to tell you but just in case thought I would inform you as she is an avid poster here.

    I don't know what I would do if my PC blew up! I would be lost also! I have a very expensive surge protector so lets hope its as good as they say it is! We are due to have some precarious power supply this winter as our hydro lakes are at an all time low. We may even have rolling black outs if we do not make the 10% saving they want. We are at present running at 7.5% savings.

    Enjoying all these posts on thinking and education!

    Carolyn

    kiwi lady
    May 26, 2003 - 06:42 pm
    I have read something of Plato when I was studying Julius Caesar and Claudius. I don't know if I was impressed or not. Found him a wee bit boring.

    Carolyn

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 26, 2003 - 07:42 pm
    A week or two ago I was without a computer for about 10 days and know EXACTLY what Mal is feeling. I'm sure she has enough thoughts and feelings within herself to keep herself occupied.

    Robby

    Justin
    May 26, 2003 - 11:27 pm
    Independent thinking is not encouraged in US education. Students take notes and feed back a mirror image of teacher output to achieve good grades. Our best students are those who learn the feedback technique early in school life and employ it well even through college.

    Critical thinking is thought to be extra work as well as an unprofitable diversion. As a result, many educated people enter the work force ready to take direction. Good, educated clerks are needed. However,it is those who challenge the status quo, who are the most productive, and who earn the highest pay.

    The problem lies in our educational system. How to correct it is the question. I propose we keep rote learning and mirror feedback but also reward and encourage the rebels.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 27, 2003 - 02:58 am
    "Protagoras founded European grammar and philology. He treatd of the right use of words, says Plato, and was the first to distinguish the three genders of nouns, and certain tenses and moods of verbs.

    "But his chief significance lay in this, that with him, rather than with Socrates, began the subjective standpoint in philosophy. He was interested in the whole process of sensation, perception, understanding, and expression. No absolute truth can be found, said Protagoras, but only such truths as hold for given men under given conditions. Contradictory assertions can be equally true for different persons or at different times.

    "All truth, goodness, and beauty are relative and subjective. To the historical eye a whole world begins to tremble when Protagoras announces this simple principle of humanism and relativity. All established truths and sacred principles crack.

    "Individualism has found a voice and a philosophy and the supernatural bases of social order threaten to melt away."

    Your individual thoughts, please?

    Robby

    Éloïse De Pelteau
    May 27, 2003 - 03:57 am
    "..the first to distinguish the three genders of nouns," I wonder how many languages have three genders in nouns because although it makes a language more attractive it doesn't seem to be logical. In French a pencil (le crayon) is masculine and a pen (la plume) is feminine. I am wondering why English has nutral nouns. To me, it is more practical but less attractive.

    "All established truths and sacred principles crack." Nothing that man says then can ever be considered as to be a definitive truth. Is that what Protagoras is saying?

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 27, 2003 - 05:12 am
    This link to COGNITIVE RELATIVISM discusses the "relativity of truth."

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 27, 2003 - 05:17 am
    Here is an outline on how to approach TRUTH -- something to chew on.

    Robby

    georgehd
    May 27, 2003 - 10:12 am
    I think that we need to distinguish the differences between beliefs facts, truth and reality. While I have some thoughts about this, I do not feel prepared to make a post yet. The question of reality came up in the discussion of the Life of Pi. At the conclusion of the book, the reader has to make a choice of which story is true. The individual reader after making a choice then has a picture of reality in his/her mind that may in fact differ from another reader. I found it an interesting exercise.

    I want to read Robby's links before commenting further.

    Percivel
    May 27, 2003 - 03:38 pm
    >Independent thinking is not encouraged in US education.<<


    This is a generalization and inheritantly not accurate. Many teachers use the inquiry metod and this requires independent thinking.

    As a teacher, my biggest problem in my subject area was the inability of students. Many would not or could not read. Those who did read could not or would not retain data read. The inability to gather data prdicts that data can't be processed. The alternative is to try to teach reading in a history class and to present data in lecture. Once the teacher becomes "expert" because he/she presents data, it is logical that students respond to all questions with a parroting answere.

    It isn't easy.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 27, 2003 - 04:36 pm
    Percivel:--Welcome to our group! As a former teacher, I'm sure you will have numerous thoughts regarding the philosophical approaches of the Ancient Greeks.

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 27, 2003 - 05:03 pm
    "The Sophists invented grammar and logic for Europe. They developed dialectic, analyzed the forms of argument, and taught men how to detect and practice fallacies. Through their stimulus and example reasoning became a ruling passion with the Greeks.

    "By applying logic to language they promoted clarity and precision of thought, and facilitated the accurate transmission of knowledge. Through them prose became a form of literature, and poetry became a vehicle of philosophy.

    "They applied analysis to everything. They refused to respect traditions that could not be supported by the evidence of the senses or the logic of reason. They shared decisively in a rationalist movement that finally broke down, among the intellectual classes, the ancient faith of Hellas.

    "Euthyphto comlained that when in the assembly he spoke of oracles, the people laughed at him as an antiquated fool."

    Now we begin to see as the title of this section states:--"The Conflict of Philosophy and Religion."

    Robby

    Justin
    May 27, 2003 - 07:18 pm
    Percival: Welcome. Teachers who are lucky enough to find the inquiry method useful and productive are to be admired. In any given Jr. High or High school there are many other teachers who put the material out and expect a reasonable approximation of the output to be returned. Generalizations are not perfect.

    I can almost feel your frustration in failing to reach students. I agree, teaching is not easy. It is particularly difficult when students are unmotivated. I'll be interested in what George has to say on this topic. I think ,he said, he taught Biology.

    georgehd
    May 27, 2003 - 07:53 pm
    Percival and Justin - first as Percival accurately noted any generalization of the sort I made is bound to be false. As a science teacher, I was particularly concerned about teaching the scientific method. This certainly encouraged independent thinking and I found that most students responded well to the challenge.

    In my earlier post, I was thinking primarily of elementary school teachers and particularly those in large school systems. In the one system I am familiar with, teachers often teach for specific tests; in other words children essentially parrot back information. This is usually not what school administrators want but it does happen. I was talking to a Cayman parent this morning and she complained, without any prompting from me, that too much rote work is required and not enough thinking. She blamed this on the quality of teachers. I do not know what teachers colleges in the US do in the way of educating teachers; when I was a teacher in the 60's and 70's, there was much complaining about teacher college curricula.

    On the other side of the coin, the art college whose board I serve on, has experienced a marked increase in the quality of entering freshmen. This is, however, a very small sample of US education in general.

    As I said earlier, teachers are much undervalued in the US.

    Bubble
    May 28, 2003 - 01:50 am
    Teachers are undervalued in Israel too. In the last ten years the school year starts with a teachers strike! They demand less hours or more pay, more benefits etc. We, as parents, are beginning to feel that the strikes are make at the costs of students time to study and are a bad example to these students too.



    Art schools are different everywhere, requirememnts are others and everyone recognize that artists are individual in their vision so that individuality is approved and encouraged.



    I remember an instance at the start of highschool when my son had to prepare a work on mythology. Since it was one of my favorite topics to draw stories from when they were kids, he asked me to help him and produced a splendid file with well thought texts about the different gods and some comments at the end with the difference in beliefs today.
    The comment from the teacher: This was too long for me to read, I can see you put some efforts in this work and will give you grades for that!!!
    Needless to say he was terribly disappointed and never wanted to work that hard again.
    Bubble

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 28, 2003 - 04:04 am
    Click HERE to read this morning's NY Times Editorial about standards in Middle Schools.

    Robby

    Bubble
    May 28, 2003 - 04:07 am
    Unfortunately it seems to be true everywhere.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 28, 2003 - 04:33 am
    "Much of the derision of piety was in the air, a natural result of growing wealth, leisure, travel, research, and speculation. The role of the Sophists in the deterioration of morals was likewise contributory rather than basic. Wealth of itself, without the aid of philosophy, puts an end to puritanism and stoicism.

    "But within these modest limits the Sophists unwittingly quickened disintegration. Most of them, barring a thoroughly human love of money, were men of high character and decent life. But they did not transmit to their pupils the traditions or the wisdom that had made or kept them reasonably virtuous despite their discovery of the secular origin and geographical mutability of morals. Their colonial derivation may have led them to underestimate the value of custom as a peaceful substitute for force or law in maintaining morality and order.

    "To define morality or human worth in terms of knowledge as Protagoras did a generation before Socrates, was a heady stimulus to thought, but an unsteadying blow to character. The emphasis on knowledge raised the educational level of the Greeks, but it did not develop intelligence as rapidly as it liberated intellect.

    "The announcement of the relativity of knowledge did not make men modest, as it should, but disposed every man to consider himself the measure of all things. Every clever youth could now feel himself fit to sit in judgment upon the moral code of his people, reject it if he could not understand and approve it, and then be free to rationalize his desires as the virtues of an emancipated soul.

    "The willingness of minor Sophists to argue that what 'Nature' permitted was good regardless of custom or law, sapped the ancient supports of Greek morality, and encouraged many experiments in living. Old men mourned the passing of domestic simplicity and fidelity, and the pursuit of pleasure or wealth unchecked by religous restraints.

    "Plato and Thucydides speak of thinkers and public men who rejected morals as superstitions, and acknowledged no right but strength. This unscrupulous indivualism degraded their broad cosmopolitanism into a cautious reluctance to defend their country.

    "The religious peasantry and the conservative aristocrats began to agree with the common citizen of the urban democracy that philosophy had becme a danger to the state."

    "Growing wealth, leisure, and travel" -- "deterioration of morals" -- "not transmiting the traditions to their pupils that had kept them virtuous" -- "the value of custom as a substitute for law" -- "knowledge as a blow to character" -- "emphasis on knowledge did not develop intelligence" -- "every man considered himself the measure of all things" -- "what Nature permits is good" -- "old men mourned the passing of domestic simplicity and fidelity unchecked by religous restraints" -- "acknowledging no right but strength" --

    Am I imagining things or am I hearing from those far off centuries the same terms I am hearing today? Need for family values? Deterioration of morals? Importance of the "return" of religion? Etc? Etc?

    Robby

    Percivel
    May 28, 2003 - 08:36 am
    I found the NYT article to be another echo to the sounds we have been hearing for many years regarding Junion High Schools. The junior high level is a no man's land. We are truly not sure as to what that age group should know and teacher training instutions ignore that age group entirely.

    Elelmentary teachers are generalists while high school teachers are specialists. Secondary schools are departmentalized, so what do we do with the "tweeners?" Does the system specialize too soon or is that practice not soon enough.

    The first three levels of learning in Bloom's Taxonomy are knowledge, comprehension and application. At what point can we expect a student to have knowledge? At what point can we expect that same sudent to demonstrate understanding of that knowledge and at what point can we expect that knowledge to be applied?

    The factory system of education does not provide for the stratification of knowledge and comprehension levels. All students are on the same page at the same time with with the same testing outcomes expected.

    What happens to the student that cannot read or cannot comprehend what is read? What happens to the student with a different learning style? (ie; learns faster with auditory or tactile sensory intput)

    One solution fits all, but the junior high student is not considered at all in terms of learning or learning style. Do we treat that student as elementary or do we apply departmentalized learning.

    Interesting questions an no easy answers under current practice.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 28, 2003 - 09:38 am
    Percival:--I would be interested in your reaction to my Post 901.

    Robby

    Percivel
    May 28, 2003 - 01:00 pm
    >Percival:--I would be interested in your reaction to my Post 901. <<


    I am not sure as to what you are looking for here, but I will give it a go.

    Your 901 Sez:

    >Am I imagining things or am I hearing from those far off centuries the same terms I am hearing today? Need for family values Deterioration of morals? Importance of the "return" of religion? Etc? Etc?<<


    If the rudiments of a culture are to survive, its traditions and beliefs must be passed along to following generations. I think the Greeks understood this. Their problems were similar to ours in that their basic cutural tenets were being diluted by the influx of foreign ideas. Like us, that influx came about because of the movement of citizens to foreign places and then back.

    Wars faught necessitated movement of people and im their case actually included the acquiring of slaves of foreign nationality as well as dissimilar religious beliefs.

    When children come to school, they are not empty in terms of knowledge. Learning has already taken place and that learning might not be at the same level nor include the same sets of behavior standards. I guess one could say that this was one of the first "multicultural" problems faced by any culture.

    With our approach to the current economic situation, the "multicultural" problems is compounded by the need to have working parents. The building of characher age 1- 5 is left to child care factories and these child care factories might well super impose a set of philosophical (religious also) values on the child. These values may be instilled without the knowledge of parents. Sooner or later, parents throw up their hands and ask how did this happen?

    If parents do not encourage moral learnings, who should? Is this the school's responsibility and which set of moral standards should the school use? If we need more religious training, which training should we choose.

    How do we solve the problems our society faces? Do we stop all intercourse with other countries and stop all foreibn travel?

    Interesting questions with a miriad set of answers.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 28, 2003 - 02:05 pm
    Percivel:--You say: "I think the Greeks understood this. Their problems were similar to ours in that their basic cutural tenets were being diluted by the influx of foreign ideas."

    Don't foreign ideas enrich a society?

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 28, 2003 - 02:19 pm
    I am assuming that everyone here constantly watches the periodic changes in the GREEN quotes in the Heading.

    We now come to that personage known by all participants here and probably by name by most people around the world - - -

    Socrates

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 28, 2003 - 02:34 pm
    "It is pleasant to stand at last face to face with a personality apparently so real as Socrates. But when we consider the two sources upon which we must rely for our knowledge of Socrates, we find that one of them, Plato, writes imaginative dramas, and that the other, Xenophon, writes historical novels, and that neither product can be taken as history.

    "Diogenes Laertius writes: 'They say that Socrates having heard Plato read the Lysis, cried out -- O Heracles! what a number of lies the young man has told about me.' Plato does not pretend to limit himself to fact. Probably it never occurred to him that the future might have scant means of distinguishing, in his work, imagination from biography.

    "But he draws so consistent a picture of his master throughout the Dialogues, from Socrates' youthful timidity in the Parmenides and his insolent loquacity in the Protagoras to the subdued piety and resignation of the Phaedo, that if this was not Socrates, then Plato is one of the greatest character creators in all literature. Aristotle accepts as authentically Socratic the views attributed to Socrates in the Protagoras.

    "Recently discovered fragments of an Alcibiades written by Aeschines of Sphettos, an immediate disciple of Socrates, tend to confirm the portrait given in the earlier dialogues of Plato, and the story of the philosopher's attachment to Alcibiades.

    "On the other hand, Aristotle classes Xenophon's Memorabilia and Banquet as forms of fiction, imaginary conversations in which Socrates becomes, more often than not, a mouthpiece for Xenophon's ideas. If Xenophon honestly played Eckermann to Socrates' Goethe, we can only say that he has carefully collected the master's safest platitudes. It is incredible that so virtuous a man should hve upset a civilization.

    "Aristoxenus of Tarentum, about 318, reported, on the testimony of his father -- who claimed to have known Socrates -- that the philosopher was a person without education, 'ignorant and debauched.' Eupolis, the comic poet, rivaled his rival Aristophanes in abusing the great gadfly.

    "Making due discount for polemic vitriol, it is at least clear that Socrates was a man, hated and loved beyond any other figure of his time."

    Did George Washington really chop down a cherry tree and say to his father that he couldn't tell a lie? Did Lincoln really walk 20 miles to return a book? Did Jefferson really sleep with his slave Sally Hemmings? All this in recent times.

    Do we know the facts about a man who lived 2,500 years ago?

    Robby

    Percivel
    May 28, 2003 - 03:58 pm
    >Don't foreign ideas enrich a society?


    Robby <<

    Depends upon the society and the foreign idea doesn't it? There are several givens in terms of public expectations. The fundamentalists of any religion usually resist new ideas especially philosophical ones. If a foreign idea alienates one's children or causes social unrest, not sure that it can necessarily be called enriching.

    A foreign idea can be dead wrong and still enrich a society because people are forced to think! It this case, all ideas can be beneficial.

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 28, 2003 - 06:52 pm

    I'm partially back. At least I'm online and able to post here. My daughter is still away in Arizona, so my bright grandson put this computer my son sent me today together for me, but he couldn't make the networking system for cable work, so I'm on an it-costs-me-money phone connection with AOL.

    On Monday my computer was zapped and fried by a huge power surge despite my surge protector, leaving me without many things on which I depend, including the means to publish my magazines, two of which are supposed to go on the web right now, and all my friends.

    My grandson emailed Moxiect who posted in WREX for me. Then he contacted my daughter, who contacted my New York son. The result of all this is that instead of a little eMachine ( which did yeoman duty for me for several years ) I now have a Hewlitt Packard computer with a 2.2 gigaHerz processor, a 60 gigabyte hard drive, an easier keyboard, a new and better mouse, speakers I haven't installed, lots of RAM and other things.

    I spent my time reading, watching TV, playing a little music on my keyboard, doing laundry, cleaning house and thinking a great deal about many different things. I skimmed through 39 posts here, and will have to read them again before I can say anything worthwhile.

    I'm just glad to be back again with friends who feel like family to me. Robby, dear Mary W called me on the phone tonight to see if I am all right. That's what I mean.

    Mal

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 28, 2003 - 07:18 pm
    We missed you a lot, Mal, but now that you are back with that 21st century machine we expect even more brilliant remarks and great links from you!

    Robby

    Justin
    May 28, 2003 - 10:51 pm
    Mal: Wonderful to have you back. I missed your comments in several posts which I knew would have attracted your interest.

    Éloïse De Pelteau
    May 29, 2003 - 04:25 am
    Glad ot see you back Mal. You will enjoy your new machine, I am sure, as much as I enjoy mine. I wonder how we could live without a computer now.

    Come to think of it I wonder how much more Greek thinkers would have influenced people if they could have used Information Technology. Do you think it is increasing people's awareness and sharpening their minds? Is it making people in the world better human beings?

    Eloïse

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 29, 2003 - 04:43 am
    "Socrates' father was a sculptor, and he himself was said to have carved a Hermes, and three Graces that stood near the entrance to the Acropolis. His mother was a midwife. It was a standing joke with him that he merely continued her trade, but in the realm of ideas, helping others to deliver themselves of their conceptions.

    "One tradition describes him as the son of a slave. It is improbable for he served as a hoplite (a career open only to citizens,) inherited a house from his father, and had seventy minas ($7000) invested for him by his friend Crito. For the rest he is represented as poor.

    "He paid much attention to the training of the body, and was usually in good physical condition. He made a reputation for himself as a soldier during the Peloponnesian War. In 432 he fought at Potidaea, in 424 at Delium, in 422 at Amhipolis. At Potidaea he saved both the life and the arms of the young Alcibiades, and gave up in the youth's favor his claim to the prize for valor. At Delium he was the last Athenian to give ground to the Spartans, and seems to have saved himself by glaring at the enemy. Even the Spartans were frightened.

    "In these campaigns, we are told, he excelled all in endurance and courge, bearing without complain hunger, fatigue, and cold. At home, when he condescended to stay there, he worked as a stonecutter and statuary.

    "He had no interest in travel, and seldom went outside the city and its port. He married Xanthippe, who berated him for neglecting his family. He recognized the justice of her complaint and defended her gallantly to his son and his friends.

    "Marriage disturbed him so little that he seems to have taken an additional wife when the mortality of males in the war led to the temporary legalization of polygamy."

    Do you folks believe all these "facts?"

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 29, 2003 - 07:48 am
    While forced to be without a computer, I thought a lot about different planes, parallel worlds and such things, since that's where we were when the blackout came for me. It's hard for me to examine these things objectively because I am resistant to them. I need proof, and that's all there is to that. I did, however, open my mind to possibilities during the time I was not here, and, as Martha Stewart says, "That is a good thing."

    Back to morality for a moment. I've posted this before. In the 60's, a time of turbulence in the United States and a time of great concern among adults about youths, I read a quote in a book which summed it all up. Kids were going to hell in a hand basket; they were immoral, not religious, irreponsible, disrespectful to elders, uncaring about the future or anything that wasn't material. To my immense astonishment I discovered that this quote had been written in China over 2000 years before. That really made me think.

    I've had the interesting experience of reading posts in discussions that are not in the Books and Literature folders. In them I see my peers saying things my grandmother said about my generation: kids' outrageous music, kids' outrageous clothes, kids' uncaring and immoral attitudes, kids' lack of respect, and so forth. This really astonishes me because we certainly are not living in my grandmother's era.

    There have been culture changes which some people my age will not admit or accept. These people do not make the attempt to understand the culture of youth today and what influences in the past have made them as they are. They do not talk to young people and try to understand them. They take the exception as the rule and judge with the mindset of the 1940's.

    These people stopped somewhere along the line and stand marking time in that place and not evolving. I become aggravated sometimes by the talk about old music -- the music of our era -- Swing bands, romantic songs, reality faced with blinders on. Swing music lasted only about ten years, do you realize it? The foundation for today's music goes way, way back in history. Swing music was "arranged", unnatural, really, and generally very uncreative, except for riffs some daring musicians tried. By latching on to that many people eliminate from their knowledge and lives some very exciting and innovative music that's going on right now.

    We somehow made a horrible war a romantic story. We glossed over things our generation did which weren't so very different from what's going on now. Girls pregnant in high school, illegal abortions, sex before marriage, single people of the opposite sex living together without a marriage license, people of the same sex living together, the use of drugs, alcoholism, murder and crime. All those things were around at that time. As far as I can see, they've been around throughout history.

    The Good Old Days are what I'm talking about. Well, we didn't live in the Good Old Days, and I have yet to figure out what was so good about them. It sounds to me as if some of the Ancient Greeks looked fondly back at the Good Old Days, too. Maybe this romanticizing and idealizing of the past is a kind of leveling agent? I can't say.

    There are as many myths and legends about Socrates as there are about any other historical figure we've read about. The truth is in there somewhere. We have to pick and choose what we believe. Frankly, I question the truth itself. Don't you?

    Mal

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 29, 2003 - 04:13 pm

    A non-posting participant wrote and asked me to post the link below.

    PERICLES FUNERAL ORATION

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 29, 2003 - 06:36 pm
    Here is a BUST of Socrates (click onto it for larger view) plus more information about him.

    Robby

    Justin
    May 29, 2003 - 07:52 pm
    Nothing unusual in the list of facts concerning Socrates. He was young when these accomplishments were entered in the record books. Young guys do things that tend to overwhelm old guys like us who remember the "old days".

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 30, 2003 - 04:33 am
    "Socratic method" is a commonly used phrase in educational circles. I am curious -- How do some of you folks define this phrase?

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 30, 2003 - 07:57 am

    Robby:- Who is Socrates? What is "method"? What are educational circles? What can be dubbed educational? Does this have anything to do with education? What is education? What are circles? What purpose do they have? What is a phrase? Who can be called folks? How does your question affect me, you, Virginia, North Carolina, the world? If my answer is correct, does that put me in a better position in your eyes? Does it win me a prize? What is a prize? What constitutes an answer in the first place? When does this inquery stop? Does it go on forever? What is an inquery? Does questioning accomplish anything? Have you learned something from this? Have I? Can one teach by questioning, and not by giving answers? What are teaching and learning? Do you know?

    Mal

    georgehd
    May 30, 2003 - 08:53 am
    Mal, do you understand what you are asking? Have you thought about the implications of these questions? Why have you choosen to word your questions the way that you do? Have you considered the evil in the world caused by unending questions? Or do you think that only good comes out of inquiry?

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 30, 2003 - 10:26 am
    George, are you asking if I understand the questions I have asked? I ask in return, do you understand the implications of my questions? Doesn't good and evil exist everywhere? Do you have an opinion which disagrees with what I ask which you can back by proof? If you do, would you please state your hypotheses, theories and proof here?

    Mal

    Percivel
    May 30, 2003 - 11:19 am
    > Or do you think that only good comes out of inquiry? <<


    Good is only one of the key questions in philosophy. The others are "What is true?', "What is real?" and "What is right?"

    It is said that all four of these questions motivate culture and are the determinants of moral behavior.

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 30, 2003 - 01:48 pm

    You are correct, Percivel. As you realize, George and I were simply demonstrating the Socratic method by means of a nonsensical exercise which doesn't have much to do with philosophy. Does it, George? Or would you again disagree?

    Mal

    georgehd
    May 30, 2003 - 01:58 pm
    Who am I to disagree?

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 30, 2003 - 02:43 pm
    You do have a way of making me laugh, George, don't you?

    Mal

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 30, 2003 - 04:35 pm
    I have just come back from a hard day at work and the answer to all your questions is --

    YES!

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 30, 2003 - 05:11 pm
    "Plato and Xenophon agree in describing Socrates' habits and his character. He was content with one simple and shabby robe throughout the year, and liked bare feet better than sandals or shoes. He was incredibly free from the acquisitive fever that agitates mankind.

    "Viewing the multitude of articles exposed for sale in the market place, he remarked, 'How many things there are that I do not want!' -- and felt himself rich in his poverty. He was a model of moderation and self-control, but all the world away from a saint. He could drink like a gentleman, and needed no timid asceticism to keep him straight.

    "He was no recluse. He liked good company, and let the rich entertain him now and then. But he made no obeisance to them, could get along very well without them, and rejected the gifts and invitations of magnates and kings.

    "All in all he was fortunate. He lived without working, read without writing, taught without routine, drank without dizziness, and died before senility, almost without pain."

    A perfect life? A goal for the rest of us?

    Robby

    Justin
    May 30, 2003 - 10:50 pm
    Modern television advertisers provide responses without questions. The questions are only implied. Yet they convince millions to do things they would not do otherwise. This successful advertising technique is the opposite of the Socratic method. Does that mean that Socrates was wrong and Proctor and Gamble right? Or is the reverse true? Should advertisers ask," What is soap? What is clean?

    kiwi lady
    May 30, 2003 - 11:25 pm
    I think I like Socrates ideas about possessions and consumerism! We can make our lives complicated by having too many gadgets etc! However I must admit to one possession I could not do without and that is my PC! I have given away nearly all my electrical kitchen gadgets as I found I never used them. I have a two televisions which I rarely watch a video player/recorder which is only used for the grands on wet days etc etc. I am not sure yet what I think about his philosophies. I must get a book from the library and decide.

    Carolyn

    kiwi lady
    May 30, 2003 - 11:27 pm
    What is knowledge?

    Carolyn

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 31, 2003 - 03:11 am
    Durant (and the GREEN quotes) move us on:--

    "Socrates was for a time fascinated by the Sophists who invaded Athens in his youth. It is likely that he was so infected with Zeno's dialectic that it never left him. Archelaus of Miletus was for a time the teacher of Socrates. Archelaus began as a physicist and ended as a student of morals. He explained the origin and basis of morals on rationalistic lines, and perhaps turned Socrates from science to ethics.

    "By all these avenues Socrates came to philosophy, and thence forth found his 'greatest good in daily converse about virtue, examining myself and others. For a life unscrutinized is unworthy of a man.' He went prowling among men's beliefs, prodding them with questions, demanding precise answers and consistent views, and making himself a terror to all who could not think clearly. Even in Hades he proposed to be a gadfly, and'find out who is wise, and who pretends to be wise and is not.'

    "He protected himself from a similar cross-examination by announcing that he knew nothing. He knew all the questions, but none of the answers. He modestly called himself an 'amateur in philosophy.' What he meant, presumably, was that he was certain of nothing except man's fallibility, and had no hard and fast system of dogmas and principles."

    Any one here who professes to be a "clear thinker?" Anyone who would like to describe himself as an "amateur philosopher?"

    Any suggestions as to to who might be the 21st century equivalent of Socrates -- in either the Western or Eastern cultures?

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 31, 2003 - 03:55 am

    I think about things a lot, often to the point of becoming very befuddled, so am not sure how clear my thinking is.

    I know somebody here who has said more than once that he never gives answers, he only asks questions. Last night I was thinking that that's what good psychologists do; ask questions, and, hopefully, force their patients ( and participants in book discussions they lead! ) to think. That's what Socrates did, and by doing so, he made himself think, too.

    Socrates, with his bare feet, just one robe and satisfaction with things that weren't material, sounds like an Ancient Greek Hippie reaction to the travelling philosophers who made so much gelt. How did he live without earning any money? Did his students give him donations? I guess I'll have to find out.

    Mal

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 31, 2003 - 04:00 am
    SH-H-H-H-H-H !!

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 31, 2003 - 04:11 am
    Please forgive me this. As some of you know, my computer died completely last Monday. I have regained some programs and files, enough to get the WREX Magazine up on the web last night. But, though the files are in this new computer, I can't access any of the 13 books or the many, many stories I've written, submittals to WREX, the m.e.stubbs poetry journal, or Sonata, the graphics program I use for publishing, and other things. Hopefully, we'll find a way to change this situation. It's better than completely losing everything I've done. This computer has a CD writer, and soon I'll put all important things on CD's.

    I also have lost email addresses I had saved on the other computer; can't remember many of them, and am gathering some of them slowly. Mary W, if you are looking in, please send me an email so I can save your address, if you would. Thank you.

    EDIT:- "What, Robby?" she says innocently. "Did I give some kind of secret away?"

    Mal

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 31, 2003 - 04:19 am
    I know nothing -- despite what any oracle says.

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 31, 2003 - 04:34 am
    The only oracle I know is the Sibyl. The last I heard she was in Hades trying to get Aeneas out. Maybe I can reach her with my new Golden Bough digital phone. If I do, I'll find out if what you say is the truth, Robby.

    Mal

    Percivel
    May 31, 2003 - 05:11 am
    >A perfect life? A goal for the rest of us?<<


    I think the key word would be "enough." There is only a perfect life in others, never for ourselves. Not enough money, not enough love, not enough power, not enough legacy.

    Percivel
    May 31, 2003 - 05:18 am
    >What is knowledge?<<


    Main Entry: knowl·edge Pronunciation: 'nä-lij Function: noun Etymology: Middle English knowlege, from knowlechen to acknowledge, irregular from knowen Date: 14th century 1 : obsolete : COGNIZANCE 2 a (1) : the fact or condition of knowing something with familiarity gained through experience or association (2) : acquaintance with or understanding of a science, art, or technique b (1) : the fact or condition of being aware of something (2) : the range of one's information or understanding <answered to the best of my knowledge> c : the circumstance or condition of apprehending truth or fact through reasoning : COGNITION d : the fact or condition of having information or of being learned 3 : archaic : SEXUAL INTERCOURSE 4 a : the sum of what is known : the body of truth, information, and principles acquired by mankind b : archaic : a branch of learning synonyms KNOWLEDGE, LEARNING, ERUDITION, SCHOLARSHIP mean what is or can be known by an individual or by mankind. KNOWLEDGE applies to facts or ideas acquired by study, investigation, observation, or experience <rich in the knowledge of human nature>. LEARNING applies to knowledge acquired especially through formal, often advanced, schooling . ERUDITION strongly implies the acquiring of profound, recondite, or bookish learning <an erudition unusual even in a scholar>. SCHOLARSHIP implies the possession of learning characteristic of the advanced scholar in a specialized field of study or investigation .

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 31, 2003 - 05:28 am
    And what do you think knowledge is, Carolyn?

    "As for me, all I know is that I know nothing."

    -Socrates

    "There are four kinds of people, three of which are to be avoided and the fourth cultivated: those who don't know that they don't know; those who know that they don't know; those who don't know that they know; and those who know that they know."

    - Unattributed Author, rendering of an Arab proverb

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 31, 2003 - 06:41 am
    "Socrates set himself to the pragmatic task of getting clear ideas. 'For himself,' he said, 'he would hold discourse, from time to time, on what concerned mankind, considering what was pious, what impious -- what was just, what unjust -- what was sanity, what insanity -- what was courage, what cowardice -- what was the nature of government over men, and the qualities of one skilled in governing them -- and touching on other subjects of which he thought that those who were ignorant might justly be deemed no better than slaves.'

    "To every vague notion, easy generalization, or secret prejudice he pointed the challenge, 'What is it?' and asked for precise definitions. It became his habit to rise early and go to the market place, the gymnasiums, the palaestras, or the workshops of artisans, and engage in discussion any person who gave promise of a stimulating intelligence or an amusing stupidity. He asked: 'Is not the road to Athens made for conversation?'

    "His method was simple.

    1 - "He called for the definition of a large idea.
    2 - "He examined the definition, usually to reveal its incompleteness, its contradictoriness, or its absurdity.
    3 - "He led on, by question after question, to a fuller and juster definition which, however, he never gave.
    4 - "Sometimes he proceeded to a general conception, or exposed another, by investigating a long series of particular instances, thereby introducing a measure of induction into Greek logic.
    5 - "Sometimes, with the famous Socratic irony, he unveiled the ridiculous consequences of the definition or opinion he wished to destroy.

    "He had a passion for orderly thinking, and liked to classify individual things according to their genus, species, and specific difference, thereby preparing for Aristotle's method of definition as well as for Plato's theory of Ideas. He liked to describe dialectic as the art of careful distinctions.

    "And he salted the weary wastes of logic with a humor that died an early death in the history of philosophy."

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 31, 2003 - 11:57 am

    "By all means marry. If you get a good wife you will become happy, and if you get a bad one you will become a philosopher."

    --Socrates (470-399 B.C.)

    Percivel
    May 31, 2003 - 12:20 pm
    "By all means marry. If you get a good wife you will become happy, and if you get a bad one you will become a philosopher."

    Dr. Phil would ask, "What is your payoff in this action?"

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 31, 2003 - 12:24 pm

    This is a link to a page of images of philosophers and scientists. Click the image to read information about each one.

    PHILOSOPHERS AND SCIENTISTS

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 31, 2003 - 12:25 pm

    Excuse my ignorance, but who's Dr. Phil?

    Mal

    Percivel
    May 31, 2003 - 12:27 pm
    >"By all means marry. If you get a good wife you will become happy, and if you get a bad one you will become a philosopher."<<


    Dr. Phil is a growth out of Oprah. He has a major TV show on NBC every weekday. He also has a web site (drphil.com)

    Has become very popular as a TV psychologist.

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 31, 2003 - 12:34 pm

    Thank you, Percivel. I don't much feel the need of a TV psychologist when there's a resident Clinical Psychologist right here.

    Last Days of Socrates. Read the Eurthyphro, Apology, Crito, Phaedo and more

    Malryn (Mal)
    May 31, 2003 - 12:49 pm

    SOCRATES, LIFE AND DEEDS

    Justin
    May 31, 2003 - 01:11 pm
    I also wondered who Dr Phil is or was.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 31, 2003 - 02:22 pm
    "No common doctrine united the followers of Socrates. They differed so widely among themselves that they became the leaders of the most diverse philosophical schools and theories in Greece -- Platonism, Cynicism, Stoicism, Epicureanism, Skepticism.

    "Socrates said to Antiphon: 'You seem to think that happiness consists in luxury and extravagance. I think that to want nothing is to resemble the gods, and that to want as little as possible is to make the nearest approach to the gods.'

    "Eucleides of Megara sharpened the Socratic dialectic into a skepticism that denied the possibility of any real knowledge.

    "There was the restless Xenophon who, though he gave up philosophy for soldiering, testified that 'nothing was of greater benefit than to associate with Socrates, and to converse with him, on any occasion, on any subject whatever.'

    "There was Plato, upon whose vivid imagination the sage made so lasting an impression that the two minds are mingled forever in philosophical history.

    "There was the rich Crito, who 'looked upon Socrates with the greatest affection, and took care that he should never be in want of anything.'

    "There was the dashing young Alcibiades, whose infidelities were to discredit and endanger his teacher, but who now loved Socrates with characteristic abandon.

    "There was the oligarchic leader Critias, who enjoyed Socrates' quips against democracy, and helped to incriminate him by writing a play in which he described the gods as the invention of clever statemen who used them as night watchmen to frighten men into decency.

    "Anytus resentd Socrates' criticisms of democracy and said: 'I think you are too ready to speak of evil of men. If you will take my advice, I would recommend you to be careful. Perhaps there is no city in which it is not easier to do men harm than to do them good. This is certainly the case at Athens.' Anytus bided his time."

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 31, 2003 - 02:59 pm
    An ITEM perhaps of interest regarding the Socratic method.

    Robby

    Justin
    May 31, 2003 - 04:07 pm
    Socrates was right. Democracy is nonsense. Only the elite vote. The masses let the elite take care of things for them. The elite form personal interest liasons which allow them to form and control a government.

    In the US these personal interest groups have cancelled out each others power and have thus neutralized their influence. There is a deciding group, however,it is one that votes only occasionally. It is the group of young undecided women in the population who decide elections.

    The major parties today struggle to learn as much as possible about the interests of these young women so they can appeal to them for their ballot. These are the people who were once called flappers and other unpleasant terms. They have little interest in government and the latest polls show they are more concerned about terrorism than about economics.

    I don't know that any system of government is better than a democracy at protecting the rights of individuals but it's decision making mechanism is nonense, just as Socrates has said.

    Justin
    May 31, 2003 - 04:52 pm
    What was this religion thing that Socrates, Plato, and some of the other Greek philosophers tried to move away from? When a Greek had a problem, when he had to make a decision, he went to an oracle who either told him what to do or directed him to read the entrails of some poor animal who had to die to give the poor Greek citizen a solution to his problem.

    The Jews had a similar method for making decisions. They resorted to the Mossaic Law or to a Rabbi during the Rabinic period. The holy books contained answers to every problem.

    The Greek philosophers relied on themselves and their power of critical inquiry to resolve problems and to make decisions. It was the beginning of self help and the end of reliance upon the Gods to tell them what to do.

    robert b. iadeluca
    May 31, 2003 - 05:14 pm
    Are we saying that Socrates preferred a MERITOCRACY?

    Robby

    Justin
    May 31, 2003 - 06:38 pm
    Plato says that Socrates preferred an aristocracy to democracy. However, one must ask. What is an aristocracy? and for that matter, What is a meritocracy? I am just not certain about the nature of a meritocracy.

    depfran
    May 31, 2003 - 06:51 pm
    It is a blessing for me to read what is written here. It is "real knowledge". The one I want my children to know and apply in their life. I believe Socrates had a mission. A divine mission comparable to Moses. He gave so much to his people, the Greeks, bringing them closer to reality by constantly seeking the truth behind their thoughts. Unlike the subtle T.V. messaages who's drive is to make you a slave... of the elite.

    Françoise

    Justin
    May 31, 2003 - 06:53 pm
    It is difficult to talk about Socrates without talking about Plato. They may be teacher and student but we know Socrates only through Plato. Socrates wrote nothing.

    In the Allegory of the Cave, an attempt is made to reflect the real world and to contrast it with an eternal world. There is after all, an eternal triangle that is an ideal form. It is not one that a geometrist draws. It is one that perfectly conforms to the definition of a triangle-an abstract notion.

    So too is there a definition of goodness to which man can approach but not achieve. It is this definition which the religious call God- the Supreme Goodness. It is in the Allegory of the Cave that one may find the Platonic influence in Christianity and in Judaism.

    Justin
    May 31, 2003 - 07:03 pm
    Francoise: Nothing divine about Socrates mission. He opposed divine wisdom and employed human wisdom to understand truth. He was executed because he was irreligious. His execution was the third greatest crime of civilization.

    HubertPaul
    May 31, 2003 - 09:21 pm
    Justin, you say:"..........He opposed divine wisdom and employed human wisdom to understand truth."

    What is truth?

    Justin
    May 31, 2003 - 09:56 pm
    Hubert Paul: I don't know what truth is. A judge once told me to tell the truth. I told the court what I saw and heard. Another witness seeing the same event said what she saw and heard. Our descriptions of the event were different. I simply could not believe that we looked at the same event. What is truth? I don't know. You tell me.

    Justin
    May 31, 2003 - 10:45 pm
    Hubert: Let's take another shot at this thing called "truth". I think we can construct a mathematical model with which one can find truth. Build a decimal place system containing the numbers 0-9 with four standard operators. These exist by definition. Now, given that framework, 2+2=4. This is true if 2-2=0 and 4-2=2 Hence we have truth by definition. I think we can do the same thing geometrically. Euclid submits definitions and tests hypotheses to find truth. The scientific method of Descartes, leads to confirmation of hypotheses within defined limits and confirmation is an expression of truth. So, truth, then is an expression of a condition which can be confirmed by observation and definition. Ask me something difficult. What is virtue? That question stumped Meno and Plato and Socrates.

    robert b. iadeluca
    June 1, 2003 - 04:29 am
    In scientific experimentation we have what is called the "operational definition." The psychologist, as an example, decides to measure if people in a particular category are happy. But what is "happiness?" He can spend hours and days holding philosophical discussions with others as to what happiness is but, in the end, he must make his own definition. He tries to give it a definition which can be measured, e.g. happiness is laughing at least three times a day. He then examines the subjects of his experiment learning, usually by self report which in itself is not that accurate, how many times they laughed.

    Other people may not think that he has measured happiness but he has at the start of his experiment defined happiness as he sees it for this particular experiment and it must be accepted.

    In another discussion group here on SN I commented on the statement occasionally made in the news that the U.S. is the most religious nation in the world. This "result" is usually based on the number of times a person goes to church. "Attending church" is an operational definition and leaves open to many people the question: What is religious? So -- what is happiness? What is truth?

    After going down deep inside yourself, what is your Operational Definition for any of these concepts?

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    June 1, 2003 - 05:29 am
    "Behind the method was a philosophy, elusive, tentative, unsystematic, but so real that in effect the man died for it. Socrates, accepting the relativism of Protagoras, refused to dogmatize, and was certain only of his ignorance.

    "Socrates participated in religious ceremonies, and was never known to utter an impious word. He professed to follow, in all important negative decisions, an inner daimonion which he described as a sign from heaven. Perhaps this spirit was another play of the Socratic irony. If so, it was remarkably well sustained. It is but one class of many appeals, in Socrates, to oracles and dreams as messages from the gods.

    "He argued that there were too many instances of amazing adaptation and apparent design to allow us to ascribe the world to chance or any unintelligent cause. On immortality he was not so definite. He pleads for it tenaciously in the Phaedo. But in the Apology he says, 'Were I to make any claim to be wiser than others, it would be because I do not think that I have any sufficient knowledge of the other world, when in fact I have none.' In the Cratylus he applied the same agnosticism to the gods: 'Of the gods we know nothing.'

    "He advised his followers not to dispute of such matters. Like Confucius, he asked them did they know human affairs so well that they were ready to meddle with those of heaven?

    "The best thing to do, he felt, was to acknowledge our ignorance, and meanwhile to obey the oracle at Delphi, which, when asked how one should worship the gods, answered, 'According to the law of your country.'"

    Mortality -- Immortality -- dreams -- intelligent causes -- the other world.

    Do most people "acknowledge their ignorance?"

    Robby

    depfran
    June 1, 2003 - 05:32 am
    Justin, I will argue with you that divine is far from religion. In fact, throughout history, the religions that came forth derived away from the truth their messages had intended to bring because men found it to difficult to understand it. So they build the religion that most suited their pleasure and way of life.

    Socrates exercised his people to discover within themselves the source of all knowledge. Again, all those who spoke the truth were better dead because then, men did not need to improve. In any case, we know who they are and what they told us even today because truth is eternal and it can never die.

    Francoise

    Éloïse De Pelteau
    June 1, 2003 - 06:34 am
    TRUTH is not definable on all aspects of it. If a person is dead, that is one truth because it is clinically evident, to another only the body dies, not the soul, to some there is no separation between body and soul, so dead is dead. Truth can have myriads of definitions by millions of people around the world.

    HAPPINESS to me defines a certain long lasting contentment arrived at after an acceptable partnership has been reached with those I am in constant contact with. Complete happiness at all times is an illusion. I have seen very funny people, the 'Life of the party', be completely depressed whenever they did not have an audience to entertain.

    RELIGION is not God, it is not the religion that keeps me believing in God because I can see elements of what I believe in in every religion we have studies so far. As for the evil that some people find in religion, the same evil exists outside of it.

    Eloïse

    robert b. iadeluca
    June 1, 2003 - 07:03 am
    What is contentment vs happiness? What is religion vs God? It is not my intention to go on with these examinations but I believe we are all beginning to understand what Socrates taught and is teaching us now.

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    June 1, 2003 - 07:21 am
    "Socrates applied his skepticism even more rigorously to the physical sciences. One should study them only so far as to guide one's life. Beyond that they are an inscrutable maze. Each mystery, when solved, reveals a deeper mystery.

    "In his youth he had studied science with Archelaus. In his maturity he turned from it as a more or less plausible myth, and interested himself no longer in facts and origins but in values and ends. Says Xenophon: 'He discoursed always of human affairs.'

    "The Sophists had also 'turned around' from natural science to man, and had begun the study of sensation, perception, and knowledge. Socrates went further inward to study human character and purpose. 'Tell me, Euthydemus, have you ever gone to Delphi?' 'Yes, twice.' 'And did you observe what is written on the temple wall -- Know thyself?' 'I did.' 'And did you take no thought of that inscription, or did you attend to it, and try to examine yourself, and ascertain what sort of character you are?'

    "Philosophy, therefore, was for Socrates ethics and politics, with logic as an introduction and a means."

    I wonder what Socrates would have thought of this discussion group?

    Robby

    Percivel
    June 1, 2003 - 07:40 am
    >Thank you, Percivel. I don't much feel the need of a TV psychologist when there's a resident Clinical Psychologist right here. <<


    I was not suggesting that anyone use any psychologists. Dr. Phil just happens to be a common figure for much of the population and as such, provides some common experiences for those who happen to watch and enjoy thouse kinds of shows.

    As a clinical psychologist, do you not see pay off as a motivational factor in human behavior?

    Malryn (Mal)
    June 1, 2003 - 08:36 am

    I have much to say this morning, but first I'll respond to Percivel's post. To clear something up, I am not a psychologist, I am a musician, artist, writer and electronic publisher. I'll make it a point to watch Dr. Phil on TV to see a figure that is common to much of this population. The implication of that interests me, and I'd like to see what kind of burden this TV psychologist bears and how well he responds to it.

    I'm not sure what is meant by the word "pay-off", but if it means reward for certain behavior, then I guess I'd say many people expect that kind of thing. "You be good," the mother says, "and you can have that lollipop." Is that what pay-off is?

    Things that motivate people can be good, and they can be bad. I'm not an authority on that, either. I can tell you how to build web pages on a computer; give you hints about playing Chopin's Fantasie Impromptu on the piano, tell you some ways that make singing Un Bel Di Vedremo easier to do, and clue you in a little about mixing paint when you want to paint a picture. Most of what I know is based on observation, some research, study, lots of practice and plain old instinct. I know a little bit about a lot of things. The more I know, the less I know, so I guess someone better equipped to answer your question should respond to you, not I.

    Mal

    Malryn (Mal)
    June 1, 2003 - 09:40 am

    Truth to me is what is proven to be true. Since I am aware that other proof is often found which refutes the first proof in science and other areas, I am led to believe that "truth" is not a constant. I try to keep an open mind about the validity of what is considered truth, so I am better prepared for all its changes.

    Religions to me are means to seek guidance, counsel and comfort through the aegis of gods or a god. People who agree on one particular way to seek and find this gather together in a particular religion which worships those gods or that god in an agreed, prescribed manner.

    To me, the word "religious" implies belief in, reverence for, and worship of a deity. Churches, mosques, temples are places where people of like mind join together for worship of this deity. People who do not worship a god are considered irreligious by most other people. They are sometimes victimized by people who do worship a god, though the creeds of their religions usually tell them this is not a good idea. I was raised in a creedless religion, whose only real tenet was respect for the brotherhood of man, so my point-of-view may be different from those who participate in a much more structured, creedal religion.

    About happiness: I will never forget what soprano Beverly Sills said when she was asked if she was happy. She said, "No, I'm not happy. I'm cheerful, and I am content most of the time."

    I think there is an exaggerated emphasis on happiness in my country, the United States. To be able to achieve what Ms Sills did and find contentment and be of good cheer is enough for this woman, who can say truthfully that she is not happy in the idealistic sense, either, or ever has been or expects to be.

    Mal

    HubertPaul
    June 1, 2003 - 10:11 am
    Religion to most people with faith is mere obedience to tradition. Either they do what is correctly anticipated from them, or they do some original thinking for themselves. Thus their religious outlook depends either on surrender to circumstances and environment or on their intellectual capacity. The first group seeks comfort and ease; the second has begun, but only begun, the search for truth.

    P.S, Factual or symbolical.....:

    When Pontius Pilate asked Jesus:"What is truth?"

    Jesus remained silent.

    robert b. iadeluca
    June 1, 2003 - 10:40 am
    "Coming at the close of the Sophistic period, Socrates perceived that the Sophists had created one of the most critical situations in the history of any culture -- the weakening of the supernatural basis of morals. Instead of a frightened return to orthodoxy, he moved forward to the profoundest question that ethics can ask:---Is a natural ethic possible?

    "Can morality survive without supernatural belief?

    "Can philosophy, by molding an effective secular moral code, save the civilization which its freedom of thought has threatened to destroy?

    "When Socrates argues that the good is not good because the gods approve of it, but that the gods approve of it because it is good, he is proposing a philosophical revolution. His conception of good, so far from being theological, is earthly to the point of being utilitarian.

    "Goodness, he thinks, is not general and abstract, but specific and practical, 'good for something.' Goodness and beauty are forms of usefulness and human advantage. Even a dung basket is beautiful if it is well formed for its purpose. Since Socrates thought that there is nothing else so useful as knowledge, knowledge is the highest virtue, and all vice is ignorance -- although 'virtue' (arete) here means excellence rather than sinlessness.

    "Without proper knowledge right action is impossible. With proper knowledge right action is inevitable. Men never do that which they know to be wrong -- i.e. unwise, injurious to themselves.

    "The highest good is happiness. The highest means to it is knowledge or intelligence."

    WOW!! Socrates brings us to a halt. As I understand it, he believes that morality can exist without a religious component. He calls the "weakening of the supernatural basis of morals" a critical point in any culture. He asks if philosophy, with its accompany freedom of thought that threatened to destroy civilization, can now save it through a moral code which has no religious basis.

    He sees "good" (virtue) and "evil" (vice), as I understand him, as having no connection with any deity. Or, to put it another way, "good" is "knowledge" and "evil" is "ignorance."

    That puts questions in my mind. If a child has not been given the opportunity to gain knowledge, is he evil? If an adult uses the knowledge he has gained to hurt people, is he good?

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    June 1, 2003 - 12:41 pm

    "Can morality survive without supernatural belief?



    "Can philosophy, by molding an effective secular moral code, save the civilization which its freedom of thought has threatened to destroy?
    The answer to both of these questions is yes.

    I'd say knowledge can lead to good and ignorance can lead to evil. I'd also say that one does not need religion to know the difference between good and evil. There are ways children learn that difference early. One is the reaction of people around them. Another is that "bad" acts can lead to injury and hurt. The pain from touching fire or a hot stove can be a very strong teacher. So can a slap or the turning of an adult's back to a child that misbehaves. Each hurts, and the child learns that if he does not act in a way that is considered good, he or she will get hurt.

    Mal

    HubertPaul
    June 1, 2003 - 01:16 pm
    "Without proper knowledge right action is impossible.............."

    What is proper knowledge?

    Justin
    June 1, 2003 - 02:20 pm
    Hubert; If you will read John 18;37 and 38 you will find that Jesus has already responded and that Pilate was merely commenting rhetorically.

    robert b. iadeluca
    June 1, 2003 - 02:26 pm
    A friendly reminder as we continue to discuss what Socrates called "supernatural belief" that we must be careful not to find ourselves inadvertently proselytizing.

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    June 1, 2003 - 02:36 pm
    "Xenophon's Socrates says 'it is absurd to choose magistrates by lot where no one would dream of drawing lots for a pilot, a mason, a flute-player, or any craftsman at all, though the shortcomings of such men are far less harmful than those that disorder our government.' He condemns the litigiousness of the Athenians, their noisy envy of one another, the bitterness of their political factions and disputes.

    "'On these accounts,' he says, 'I am constantly in the greatest fear lest some evil should happen to the state too great for it to bear.' Nothing could save Athens, he thought, except government by knowledge and ability. This was no more to be determined by voting than the qualifications of a pilot, a musician, a physician, or a carpenter. Nor should power or wealth choose the officials of the state. Tyranny and plutocracy are as bad as democracy. The reasonable compromise is an aristocracy in which office would be restricted to those mentally fit and trained for it.

    "Despite these criticisms of Athenian democracy Socrates recognized its advantages, and appreciated the liberties and opportunities that it gave him."

    A society ruled by a mentally fit and trained aristocracy? Your comments, please?

    Robby

    Justin
    June 1, 2003 - 03:14 pm
    The presence or absence of a supernatural being has little bearing on social behavior of people. The four commandments addressing social behavior simply complement secular laws. Secular laws are made for social convenience not for religious reasons. The US Constitution and the body of law that it supports controls social behavior without reference to any divinity.

    People with knowledge of the law, tend to obey the law. There are however, some who see an oportunity to gain an advantage by not obeying the law. Are any of these people restrained by the presence of a super being? Perhaps. But those who have faith in a supreme being- popes, bishops, rabbis, priests, ministers, are not restrained. I think very very few, if any potential malefactors, are kept from prison by divine commandment.

    Justin
    June 1, 2003 - 03:57 pm
    I think Jefferson had something similar in mind. A mentally fit and knowledgeable aristocracy fit the founding father's early image of a democratic government. The franchise was not universal. Adams ignored Abigail's suggestion that he "remember the ladies".

    Justin
    June 1, 2003 - 04:27 pm
    Eloise; I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "evil inside a religion as well as outside. If you mean there are evil doers in religious communities and there are evil doers among lay people. I agree.

    But the evils committed by religions are so overwhelmingly horrific in their impact on society that it is difficult to understand why otherwise intelligent people support these organizations. The damage done by fundementalism- Islamic, Judaic and Christian, with a "we're right you're wrong" policy is substantial.

    Consider also the failure of Pious Xll, to stop a holocaust that his church's policies promoted. Those policies did not end until John XXlll's Bull. Consider as well the policies of the Church that allow members of the clergy to molest children without restraint.

    These evils proceed unabated. It is of concern that the US Government supports these organizations with significant tax advantages.

    Éloïse De Pelteau
    June 1, 2003 - 06:06 pm
    Why expect perfection in human beings Justin? Horrendous crimes are committed by people, no matter what they believe in.

    The proof that a person is a true believer is his/her love, compassion, tolerence, forgiveness for other people. All that glitters is not gold. -- "L'habit ne fait pas le moine" (I don't know the translation to that) -- Love your neighbor as you love yourself. They might be clichés, but they tell us a lot.

    Eloïse

    Percivel
    June 1, 2003 - 06:09 pm
    >I'd say knowledge can lead to good and ignorance can lead to evil. <<


    Knowledge can also lead to evil and ignorance can lead to good! Unintended consequesces just happen. Knowledge is neither good nor evil. It can be accurate or inaccuraate, but even inaccurrate knowledge can be good rather than evil.

    It is the human factor that makes knowledge good or evil. One can say that the taking of a life is evil, but the taking of that life in defense of one's child may not be evil.

    A person's evaluation of good or evil is dependent upon what is thought of as being the purpose of life in general. If the purpose in life is to feel good most of the time, then anything one does in order to feel good becomes good and anything which makes a person feel bad becomes evil.

    Percivel
    June 1, 2003 - 06:11 pm
    >Horrendous crimes are committed by people, no matter what they believe in. <<


    If what a person does is contrary to what they believe, then that action can be evil; but if the behavior is consistent with the belief, it isn't evil. (Not evil to the perp.)

    Justin
    June 1, 2003 - 10:05 pm
    One can not rationally expect perfection in human beings. That would be contrary to nature. However, in the cases mentioned, the root of the problem is inherent in the religious idea. I'm not sure that it is related to a belief in God. It has more to do with the legends that underlie a particular religion.

    In Christianity, the problem lies in the synoptic gospels and in the Book of John. The language, particularly in John, says that Pilate would not have crucified Christ had the Jews not insisted upon it. Therefore all Jews are to blame for the crucifixion and deserve to be punished. That idea was fostered by Church hierarchy until John XXlll's Bull.

    We are not concerned here with a single evil person although there is no dearth of guilty parties. It is dogmatic policy based on scriptural authority and on the willingness of countless Popes and others to support this image that is the problem. Because John XXlll's Bull said " knock it off" does not mean that parishioners will "knock it off". Most will never know about the Bull and will continue the evil.

    We must get back to Greece.

    Justin
    June 1, 2003 - 10:56 pm
    The title of this chapter" The Conflict of Religion and Philosophy" would lead one to expect some discussion of the contributions of Plato to religion. But Durant seems more interested in describing Socrates as a gadfly than in discussing the big Platonic contributions. It was Plato, Plotinus, Paul and Augustine who made Christianity what it is.

    robert b. iadeluca
    June 2, 2003 - 04:39 am
    "The majority of the Athenians looked upon Socrates with irritated suspicion. The orthodox in religion considered him to be the most dangerous of the Sophists. While he observed the amenities of the ancient faith, he rejected tradition, wished to subject every rule to the scrutiny of reason, founded morality in the individual conscience rather than in social good or the unchanging decrees of heaven, and ended with a skepticism that left reason itself in a mental confusion unsettling to every custom and belief.

    "Democrats like Anytus and Meletus branded Socrates as the intellectual source of the oligarchic rection, and determined to remove him from Athenian life. They succeeded, but they could not destroy his immense influence. The dialectic he had received from Zeno was passed down through Plato to Aristotle, who turned it into a system of logic so complete that it remained unaltered for nineteen hundred years.

    "Upon science his influence was injurious. Students were turned away from physical research, and the doctrine of external design offered no encouragement to scientific analysis.

    "The individualist and intellectualist ethic of Socrates had a modest share, perhaps, in undermining Athenian morals. But its emphasis on conscience as above the law became one of the cardinal tenets of Christianity. Through his pupils the many suggestions of his thought became the substance of all the major philosophies of the next two centuries.

    "The most powerful element in his influence was the example of his life and character. Every generation that sought an exemplar of simple living and brave thinking turned back to nourish its ideals with his memory."

    Subject every rule to the scrutiny of reason -- find morality in the individual conscience -- place conscience above the law -- reason to the point of doubting every custom and belief.

    There are SNers who email me from time to time saying that participating in this discussion group is too serious and too difficult. Are our thoughts here too unorthodox?

    Robby

    georgehd
    June 2, 2003 - 06:06 am
    There have been so many posts over the weekend that I will have to read before I can rejoin the discussion. Sorry.

    Robby, this is a serious discussion and I for one appreciate that. There are certainly times when I do not fully understand a topic, particularly in the area of philosophy. But I see this as a challenge. Frankly, one can read the discussion without taking part and learn a great deal. It is like taking a challenging course. And as a former teacher, I can say that there are few if any really stupid questions.

    I do think that when we reached Socrates, we are discussing very interesting and very complicated issues and this takes time. I hope that we stick with Socrates for a week as I for one would appreciate a more concentrated examination of our thoughts about him and his philosophy. IMO

    Malryn (Mal)
    June 2, 2003 - 06:44 am

    Sometimes I think this discussion is too serious. That's when I make a silly remark that is too often taken seriously. I'm sure Socrates would agree that life without humor and wit can be pretty darned dull. Civilization's story is a complex one which should be taken seriously, though. When I see that what happened in ancient times is very, very similar to what happens now, these topics don't seem difficult.

    Lately I feel as if I have to watch everything I say. In response to Robby's comment yesterday that "good" is 'knowledge' and 'evil' is 'ignorance' " I said that knowledge can lead to good and ignorance can lead to evil. I was picked up on that and should have posted Robby's quote and the fact that I was responding to it before I wrote what I did. I would certainly agree that this medium is not an easy one when it comes to being understood.

    I don't think any of us who participate here have unorthodox views, though it may seem that way to some who see ideas here which are new to them and different points-of-view. I know that I had some growing pains when we first started to discuss Our Oriental Heritage and had to open my mind to what Durant and the people here said. Then I realized that this forum is a place of growth and that sometimes growth can be uncomfortable.

    In a way, by examining everything with reason, Socrates was defying the majority of his world. This was as uncomfortable for those people as the growth in this discussion I just mentioned. It was not that Socrates was preaching that he was right, or that he was preaching absolutes, but I think sometimes it is hard for people to distinguish between a search for truth from a statement of unquestionable fact that, by Athena, this is true!

    I have had the impression that Aristotle saw things in black and white. Socrates does not. There are blacks and there are whites, and there are all the areas of the spectrum dissolving into innumerable shades of gray in between those two extremes.

    I've often thought it must be nice to be so confident in what you believe that there are no questions about it or doubts that your belief is right. I never enjoyed that kind of luxury, and no doubt never will.

    Mal

    georgehd
    June 2, 2003 - 12:18 pm
    Mal, a very good post and I share your sentiments. I will do my best to add wit from time to time. Or shouldn't I do that? (Socratic method, no need to reply)

    Justin, Plato comes up later in Durant's book.

    A friend of mine recommended a rather small book which discusses rather big ideas - Think by Simon Blackburn. The book discusses the big questions -knowledge, consciousness, fate, God, truth, goodness, justice. I confess that I find the book rather daunting, but it does deal with the issues being discussed in a concise way.

    Justin
    June 2, 2003 - 04:23 pm
    You've been looking ahead, George. Our future is in Durant's hands. I do appreciate your assurance that Plato is yet to come.It does seem unusual that he would be addressed later when Socrates is now the subject and it is through Plato and one or two others that we know Socrates. I am looking forward to discussing the relationship between Plato and Aristotle. They were not contemporary but their ideas flowed from one to the other.

    This discussion does lean toward critical inquiry. That's serious business. Very little is taken on faith by most of the participants and like Socrates, the gadfly, we may put some people off with that approach. I am willing to risk that in order to continue the discussion. However, every once in a while, someone gets off a funny that livens the discussion. It is very often the funnies that carry the very serious stuff.

    robert b. iadeluca
    June 2, 2003 - 06:31 pm
    We now come to a subtopic which is always popular in this discussion group --

    The Literature of the Golden Age

    "The ideas and issues that in one generation are fought out on the field of research and speculation provide in the succeeding generation the background of drama, fiction, and poetry.

    "In Greece the literature did not lag behind the philosophy. The poets were themselves philosophers, did their own thinking, and were in the intellectual vangurd of their time. That same conflict between conservatism and radicalism which agitated Greek religion, science, and philosophy found expression also in poetry and drama, even in the writing of history.

    "Since excellence of artistic form was added, in Greek letters, to depth of speculative thought, the literature of the Golden Age reached heights never touched again until the days of Shakespeare and Montaigne."

    Your comments, please?

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    June 3, 2003 - 04:31 am
    "Pindar is the transition between the two periods. He inherits the lyric form, but fills it with dramatic magnificence. After him poetry breaks through its traditional limits, and, in the Dionysian drama, combines with religion, music, and the dance to make a greater vehicle for the splendor and passion of the Golden Age.

    "Pindar came of a Theban family that traced its lineage back to primitive times, and claimed to include many of the ancient heroes commemorated in his verse. His uncle, an accomplished flutist, passed down to Pindar mch of his love for music, and something of his skill.

    "For advanced musicial instruction the parents sent the boy to Athens, where Lasus and Agathocles taught him choral composition. Before he was twenty -- i.e. by 502 -- he returned to Thebes, and studied with the poetess Corinna. Five times he competed against Corinna in public song, and five times was beaten. But Corinna was very pleasing to behold, and the judges were men. Pindar called her a sow, Simonides a crow, himself an eagle.

    "Despite this myopia his reputation rose so high that his fellow Thebans soon concocted a story that told how once, as the young poet slept in the fields, some bees had settled upon his lips, and had left their honey there.

    "Soon he was handsomely commissioned to write odes in honor of princes and rich men. He was the guest of noble families in Rhodes, Tenedos, Corinth, and Thens, and for a time lived as royal bard at the courts of Alexander I of Macedon, Theron of Acragas, and Hieron I of Syracuse. Usually his songs were paid for in advance, very much as if a city should in our days engage a composer to celebrate it with an original composition for chorus and dance, and to conduct the performance himself.

    "When Pindar returned to Thebes, towards his forty-fourth year, he was acclaimed as Boeotia's greatest gift to Greece."

    Pindar may have been accomplished but aren't we also reading here of "what to do or not do" as one "rises up the ladder of fame?"

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    June 3, 2003 - 06:00 am

    I can't think of anything Pindar wrote, but on seeing his name here I was immediately reminded of "The Hermit Songs" by Samuel Barber, some of which I've sung in concerts. The words come from poetry and fragments written by Medieval nuns. In one of them the nun is singing to her cat: "Pindar, dear Pindar". This is lovely music, and if you have the chance to listen to it, please do.

    Now to see if I can find something by the real Pindar.

    Mal

    Malryn (Mal)
    June 3, 2003 - 06:08 am

    Here's a page about Pindar's Epinician Odes. There are some of them linked to this page.

    Pindar's Epinician Odes

    Malryn (Mal)
    June 3, 2003 - 06:21 am

    "Pindar, during his life, was honored among all the Greek cities for his poems and he was invited often by tyrants and monarchs to their courts, especially by Amyntas of Macedon, Arkesilaos of Kyrene, Theron of Agrigentum and Hieron of Syracuse, where he lived from 476 to 472 BC.

    "In 438 BC, at the age of eighty years old, he died in the theater of Argos, at the time he was reciting one of his poems."

    What a way to go!

    MORE

    Bubble
    June 3, 2003 - 07:03 am
    Mal, that is how Moliere ended his life, on stage, acting one of his comedies and coughing to death from phtisis.

    Percivel
    June 3, 2003 - 08:25 am
    >where he lived from 476 to 472 BC.<<


    Wow! Must have been quite a man! He packed eighty years of living in four years? I am truly jealous. LOL

    Bubble
    June 3, 2003 - 08:31 am
    No Percivel, he just lived in Syracuse between those years, if you re-read it...

    CalKan
    June 3, 2003 - 10:23 am
    I am the one that asked for the Oration. It is difficult for me to imagine an audience that would attend a long oration, then or now. Only a captured audience for a commencement address or a niche audience for a state of the union speech happens in our age. I have an MS degree but severely deficient of a real education---so much so that I don't know what a real education entails. I do know that I am very fortunate to have the advantage of this technology and access to this space where you, the participants, engender very enriching experiences and offer contributions that are priceless in the furtherence of my education. I have found it true of the participants in Dante's Inferno discussion group.

    Justin
    June 3, 2003 - 03:34 pm
    I am glad that Pindar mentioned Telesicrates in the title of the ode of that name for upon reading the ode one is hard pressed to find praise for the athlete. The mythical formation of Telesicrates city is featured prominently in the ode as is the beauty of Cyrene and the games wrought by her father for her hand.

    The meter of the Ode is lost, unfortunately, in the Greek translation but the skill of the writer in avoiding personal praise is evident. I think the reading of an ode in ancient Greece was accompanied by a lyre and a singing voice. If the singer was attractive that added to the pleasure of the audience which was most often made up of men and perhaps courtesans, as well.

    robert b. iadeluca
    June 3, 2003 - 03:56 pm
    Nice to have you with us, CalKan!! Continue to share your thoughts with us.

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    June 3, 2003 - 04:00 pm
    We have now completed 4,000 postings of "The Life of Greece" and will soon be moved to another page. Just continue posting as you have been and be sure to click onto "Subscribe" when you get there.

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    June 3, 2003 - 04:09 pm
    "Pindar worked painstakingly, composing the music for each poem, and often training a chorus to sing it. He wrote hymns and paeans for deities, dithyrambs for the festivals of Dionysus, parthenaia for maidens, enkomia for celebrities, skolia for banquets, threnoi , or dirges, for funerals, and epinikia, or songs of victory, for winners at the Panhellenic competitions.

    "Of all these only forty-five odes remain, named after the games whose heroes they honored. Of these odes, again, only the words survive, none of the music. In judging them, we are in the position of some future historian who, having the librettos of Wagner's operas but nothing of the scores, should list him as a poet rather than a composer, and should rank him by the words that once attended upon his harmonies. Of if we picture some Chinese scholar, unfamiliar with Christian story, reading in one evening, in lame translation, ten Bach chorals divorced from their music and ritual, we shall measure our justice to Pindar.

    "When read today, ode after ode, in the silence of the study, he is beyond comparison the dreariest outpost in the classical landscape."

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    June 3, 2003 - 04:13 pm
    Here is ONE DEFINITION of an Ode.

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    June 4, 2003 - 03:51 am
    "Only the analogy of music can explain the structure of these poems. To Pindar, as to Simonides and Bacchylides, the form to be followed in an epinician ode was as compulsory as sonata form in the sonatas and symphonies of modern Europe.

    "First came the statement of the theme -- the name and story of the athlete who had gained the prize, or of the nobleman whose horses had drawn their chariot to victory. In general Pindar celebrates 'the wisdom of man, and his beauty, and the splendor of his fame.'

    "In truth he was not much interested in his formal subject. He sang in praise of runners, courtesans, and kings, and was willing to accept any promptly paying tyrant as a patron saint if the occasion gave scope to his rich imagination and his proudoly intricate verse. His topic might be anything from a mule race to the glory of Greek civilization in all its variety and spread.

    "He was loyal to Thebes, and not more inspired than the Delphic oracle when he defended Theban neutrality in the Persian War. Later he was ashamed of his error, and went out of his way to praise the leader of the Greek defense as 'renowned Athens, rich, violet-crowned, worthy of song, bulwark of Hellas, god-protected city.'

    "The Athenians are said to have given him ten thosand drachmas ($10,000) for dithyrambs, or processional song, in which these lines occurred. Thebes, we are less reliabily informed, fined him for his implied reproof, and Athens paid the fine."

    Odes, music, sonatas, symphonies, themes -- any thoughts here?

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    June 4, 2003 - 03:56 am
    Here is a DEFINITION of a sonata.

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    June 4, 2003 - 04:24 am

    The Sonata Form in music consists of two themes or melodies, A and B. A is stated in the original, or tonic, key; then B is stated in another key, often the dominant key, which is a fifth tone above the tonic: C major followed by G major, for example, and a return to C. There follows a Development, or embellishment, of both themes which may travel through several different keys until there is a recapitulation to the two themes in the original keys. This occasionally is followed by a Coda which ends the movement. If I remember correctly, Haydn created the Sonata Form as we know it today. It stood out in great contrast to the canons and fugues which had preceded it. Composers of classical Sonatas and Symphonies usually used the Sonata Form in the first and last movements of works called Sonatas for single or small groups of instruments and Symphonies for a large orchestra.

    I read that an ode must be written on a serious subject. That subject or theme is stated in the beginning of the ode. There is no prescribed form, but certain rhyming patterns may be repeated.

    Mal

    Malryn (Mal)
    June 4, 2003 - 04:29 am

    Robby, if I'd known you were going to link to Classical Music Archives, I wouldn't have posted my version of the Sonata Form!

    By the way, if you want to listen to good classical music in the form of midi files or mp3's, Classical Music Archives is the place to find it.

    Mal

    georgehd
    June 4, 2003 - 10:04 am
    Mal, thanks for the music link.

    robert b. iadeluca
    June 4, 2003 - 12:36 pm
    "Pindar lived to the age of eighty, secure in Thebes from the turmoil of Athenian thought. 'Dear to a man,' he sang, 'is his own home city, his comrades and his kinsmen, so that he is well content. But to foolish men belongeth a love for things afar.'

    ""Ten days before his end (442) he sent to ask the oracle of Ammon, 'What is best for man' -- to which the Egyptian oracle answered, like a Greek, 'Death.' Athens put up a statue to him at the public cost, and the Rhodians inscribed his seventh Olympian ode -- a panegyric of their island -- in letters of gold upon a temple wall.

    "When, in 335, Alexander ordered rebellious Thebes to be burned to the ground, he commanded his soldiers to leave unharmed the house in which Pindar had lived and died."

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    June 4, 2003 - 01:29 pm
    "The story is told in the Lexicon of Suidas that during the performance of a play by Pratinas, about 500 B.C., the wooden benches upon which the auditors sat gave way, injuring some, and causing such alarm that the Athenians built, on the southern slope of the Acropolis, a theater of stone, which they dedicated to the god Dionysus.

    "In the next two centuries similar theaters rose at Eretria, Epidaurus, Argos, Mantines, Delphi, Tauromenium (Taormina), Syracuse, and wlsewhere in the scattered Greek world.

    "But on the Dionysian stage was fought out the bitterest phase of that war, between the old theology and the new philosophy, which binds into one vast process of thought and change the mental history of the Periclean age."

    A "battle" on the stage for the minds of men. I wonder if we have any such thing these days.

    Robby

    Fifi le Beau
    June 4, 2003 - 05:11 pm
    Robby, yes we do have battles on stage for the minds of men today. Tune in to C-Span one, two, three, and you can watch a parade of people presenting their ideas in all forms to an audience as small as half a dozen to large auditoriums holding thousands. They even show up in tents at book festivals, where ideas of every conceivable notion are put up for public display.

    During the week there is political oration and debate, and on weekends on C-Span two non fiction books that sometimes do for athletes, tryants, statesmen, sailors, etc. what Pindar did for Greeks in his day and time. Although not written in his style or set to music, they have the same effect of making sure the ones written about are remembered.

    How they are remembered is more complicated today than in Pindars Greece. Men and women still pay writers to write their story and publish their account of their glory as athletes or other accomplishments. Many would do well to keep it short, and I for one like poetry as a way of expressing a crowning achievement.

    In an effort to introduce my sons to non fiction and biography when they were young, I brought home stacks of books about famous athletes and feats of derring do to catch their interest. I usually gave the books a once over to make sure they were suitable, and in one I remember I speed read through over 200 pages to get to this athletes one moment of glory. He was a guard on the Green Bay Packers and he stopped the play at the line of scrimmage in the last seconds to win the game for his team. This is his moment of fame, recorded for history in a photograph with Vince Lombardi on his shoulders after the game. A nice young man, but a short ode from a modern Pindar would have done the trick.

    I applaud these wonderful Greeks who lived over 2,000 years ago, and their questioning of custom and belief.

    I doubt all custom and belief borne of superstition.

    ......

    Justin
    June 4, 2003 - 06:02 pm
    Americans have not matured enough to debate religion and the new philosophy (the US Constitution) in a public forum. Most sponsors are fearful of taking a stand against religion. The old dictum against discussing religion and politics in polite society seems to prevail. We here in this forum are privileged to have so many wonderful topics to discuss- topics that have no other viable forum.

    Persian
    June 4, 2003 - 08:00 pm
    JUSTIN - I live in the metropolitan Washington DC area and we've had some pretty good debates on religion in several of our area mosques and Christian churches which are active in interfaith programs. I've been impressed with the level of respect by the participants, the thoughtful questions posed to (and by) individuals of different ethnic, race or religious backgrounds, and the diverse discussion of answers. There have also been substantial comments about "religion within a Democracy" (USA) as opposed to religious acceptance (or just tolerance) within communities located in non-democratic countries.

    Fifi le Beau
    June 4, 2003 - 08:23 pm
    Persian, but did they invite the philosophers, who would come with questions?

    ......

    Persian
    June 4, 2003 - 09:18 pm
    Sorry, Fifi, I don't understand your question. Could you clarify, please?

    Justin
    June 4, 2003 - 10:51 pm
    Mahlia: I think it's nice that religious people invite other religious people to discuss religious differences. That's not a public forum. It's nice that an Iman in the District is able to converse with other folks interested in religious topics. What I'm talking about is critical inquiry. I suspect that is what Fifi has in mind when she suggests inviting philosophers. In the public forum topics of this kind are generally avoided.

    robert b. iadeluca
    June 5, 2003 - 03:28 am
    Fifi:--Thank you for a well-thought out and expressed posting. It certainly gives the rest of us pause to think.

    Robby

    robert b. iadeluca
    June 5, 2003 - 04:09 am
    "The great theater is, of course, open to the sky. The fifteen thousand seats, rising in a fanlike semicircle of tiers toward the Parthenon, face Mt. Hymettus and the sea. When the persons of the drama invoke the earth and the sky, the sun and the stars and the ocean, they are addressing realities which most of the audience, as it listens to the speech or chant, can directly see and feel.

    "The seats, originally of wood, later of stone, have no backs. Many people bring cushions. But they sit through five plays in a day with no other known support for their spines than the unaccommodating knees of the auditors behind them.

    "In the front rows are a few marble seats with backs for the local high priests of Dionysus and the officials of the city. At the foot of the auditorium is an orchestra, or dancing space, for the chorus. At the rear of this is a small wooden building known as the skene, or scene, which serves to represent now a palace, now a temple, now a private dwelling, and probably also to house the players while off stage.

    "There are such simple 'properties' -- altars, furniture, etc. -- as the story may reuire. In the case of Aristophanes' Birds there are important adjusters of scenery and costume. Agatharchus of Samos paints backgrounds in such a way as to produce the illusion of distance. Several mechanical devices help to vary the action or the place.

    "To show an action that has transpired within the skene, a wooden platform (ekkyklema) may be wheeled out, and have human figures arranged on it in a tableau suggestive of what has occurred. So a corpse may be on it, with the murderers holding bloody weapons in their hands. It is against the traditions of the Greek drama to represent violence directly on the stage.

    "At either side of the proscenium is a large, triangular, upright prism that turns on a pivot. Each face of the prism has a different scene painted on it. By revolving these periaktoi the background can be altered in a moment. A still stranger apparatus is the mechane, or machine, a crane with pulley and weights. It is placed upon the skene at the left, and is used to lower gods and heroes from heaven down to the stage, or to raise them back to heaven, or even to exhibit them suspended in the air.

    "Euripides in particular is fond of using this mechanism to let down a god -- a deus ex machine, as the Romans put it -- who piously unties the knot of his agnostic plays."

    Five plays in a row -- without having to change videotapes. No remote control in sight. Hard seats rather than a soft sofa. And an audience being forced to use its imagination.

    Mankind progresses!!

    Robby

    Éloïse De Pelteau
    June 5, 2003 - 04:45 am
    EPIDAURUS

    The fan shape of these theaters on the slant of a hill produces a quality of sound that modern techniques have a hard time to reproduce. In Montreal we have such an outdoor amphitheater where we have concerts and plays in the summer. It is located in a beautiful park with a high fountain as a background. Some evenings we have spectacular shows with a colorful sunset in the background. It holds several thousand people and it is free.

    Eloïse

    robert b. iadeluca
    June 5, 2003 - 05:13 am
    Those photos are wonderful, Eloise. Be sure, everyone, to click onto them to enlarge them.

    Robby

    Persian
    June 5, 2003 - 07:09 am
    JUSTIN - In the public forum topics of this kind are generally avoided.

    Changing venues from churches and mosques, it has been my experience also that in "public forums" (at least in this regional area), people do indeed discuss their religious differences in front of large audiences, often with unscripted questions posed by members of those audiences. "Critical thinking" is the name of the game and participants are often some of the most distinguished in their fields. There are several large universities in the Washington DC area, which have held programs focused on various topics within the overall religious/cultural/ethnic/language/philosophical issues which are foremost in the minds of many today. Organizations in Washington - the Brookings Institution, the Wilson Center, the Institute for International Education, the Fulbright Commission for Senior Scholars, the East West Center, etc. - host regular public forums at which distinguished scholars (philosophers as well as those from other fields), academics, students and members of various faith-based organizations exchange ideas. Some of the audiences are small (200-300 participants), others much larger and scheduled over several days. Speakers, panelists and workshop participants not only state their own ideas and feelings, but discourse at length with individuals of other beliefs and backgrounds.

    It has been my personal experience in more than 30 years of working with international issues (in the USA and abroad) that people are not hesitant to talk about "differences" or to elicit other opinions, ideas and creative ways to dialogue with colleagues and strangers. Some individuals are more assertive/aggressive than others (here I think of the Russians, orthodox and evangelical Christians, fundamentalist Muslims)and stubbornly hold to their point. Other are more amenable to change. But whatever their beliefs and backgrounds, they are in a public forum and talking with others about their beliefs, however rigid or fluid they may be. As crisis areas in the world are identified - either by the media identifying conflict aras or through humanitarian efforts, these organizations adapt their programs to address the regions and issues.

    robert b. iadeluca
    June 5, 2003 - 07:17 am
    Would you agree, Mahlia, that cosmopolitan Washington, DC is not a typical city and is certainly different from small-town America?

    Robby

    Persian
    June 5, 2003 - 11:27 am
    ROBBY - "tongue-in-cheek," right, Robby? Some of the best discussions in a "public forum" I've attended either as participant or panelist have been in much smaller (and less diverse) communities than Washington DC. Last year, I spent a considerable amount of time working with a group in a small town south of St. Louis. The people simply wanted to know "what's going on in the Middle East." I don't think the size of a community necessarily has anything to do with content. It's really whether the residents want to know about sometihing, understand better what is happening around the world, and filter the new understanding through their own community eyes. When I was in China years ago, one of the city-to-city bridge programs was with a small town (not city) in Missouri. The Americans wanted to understand Chinese people; we set up a Distance Learning program, which allowed the American students to interact by televideo conferencing from their school to the university at which I was teaching in China. American and Chinese students learned a tremendous amount from each other - as similar programs across the USA continue to provide a climate of learning to their students and partners in numerous countries around the world.

    There is an enormous difference between distinguished scholars and academics from many fields sitting in a professional conference, discussing pre-arranged topics. Most of the speakers, panelits and workshop participants are from certain fields and this is simply a part of what they do. On the other hand, in towns throughout the USA (and abroad) people who are simply residents of the area are "reaching and stretching" to learn about a topic. I used to live in Bozeman, Montana in the 60's and there was not much international activity going on. UNTIL we set up a partnership program with Brazil and Argentina. Years earlier, I lived in a small village (about 300 people) in Michigan. Same thing happened there.

    I truly believe that it is up to the people of an area - whether cosmopolitan Washington DC or a more rural area - to decide they want to learn. And then go about doing it! Scholars travel; they can be invited to almost anywhere in the world; many accept speaking engagements for no fee; school teachers, Chambers of Commerce (or other community organizations)just have to pick up a phone or sit down at a commputer to extend an invitation. Especially in the USA, there is no reason for folks not to know what is going on. And if they want to have a "featured speaker," in a public forum (Town Meeting), colleges and universities are more than willing to provide a knowledgeable guest speaker.

    Certainly when politicians are engaged in a campaign, they have no qualms about traveling the country. People turn out to hear them, invite them to speak at various events, answer questions that are important to the community. It's exactly the same with any topic a community might want to learn more about. Just ask!

    Justin
    June 5, 2003 - 04:22 pm
    That's very interesting, Mahlia. I think much of what you describe is the result of broader and more diverse interests among people in the the nation's capitol. I must agree, that small provincial communities may invite scholars to talk to them. My own community is quite small (population 1500) yet we have managed to invite Middle Eastern scholars from our local university. They lecture, entertain questions, and stay for coffee. WE don't attract more than ten people to a lecture. Still, you're right. It is a public forum. We haven't tried religious questions yet but someday...perhaps.

    robert b. iadeluca
    June 5, 2003 - 05:02 pm
    "The chorus is in many ways the most important as well as the most costly part of the spectable. Often it gives its name to the drama. Through it, for the most part, the poet expresses his views on religion and philosophy.

    "The history of the Greek theater is a losing struggle of the chorus to dominate the play. At first the chorus is everything. In Thespis and Aeschylus its rule diminishes as the number of actors increase. In the drama of the third century it disappears.

    "Usually the chorus is composed not of professional singers but of amateurs chosen from the civic roster of the tribe. They are all men, and number, after Aeschylus, fifteen.

    "They dance as well as sing, and move in dignified procession across the long and narrow stage, interpreting through the poetry of motion the words and moods of the play."

    Is there anywhere today the existence of a chorus in the manner in which it is described here?

    Robby

    Persian
    June 5, 2003 - 05:37 pm
    ROBBY - yes there are. Special historical productions are held in Petra (Jordan), Giza (Egypt), and during the time of the late Shah Mohamed Reza Pahlavi, events were also held in Persepolis (Iran).

    Persian
    June 5, 2003 - 05:43 pm
    JUSTIN - why wait to entertain questions on religion if you have a qualified speaker in front of you? The size of the audience can fluxuate widely depending upon how the event is advertised and/or what element of your community you wish to attract. Several years ago, I was invited to speak on various aspects of the Middle East and Islam to "a small group of interested people" in a local synagogue. When I inquired about the size of the audience, I was told "there will probably be about 20-25." When I arrived and took the podium, I looked out at an audience of more than 250 and the Moderator apologized for misrepresenting the size of the audience. So it all depends on what you want to accomplish once you issue the invitation to the speaker.

    robert b. iadeluca
    June 5, 2003 - 06:19 pm
    We haven't heard from Mal. I hope that she (or her computer) are all right.

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    June 5, 2003 - 07:00 pm

    Robby, I'm here. Rather thoughtful today and haven't had anything to contribute. I'm trying to remember what I learned about Greek plays years ago in a theater course I took. I'll be back later or tomorrow.

    Mal

    Justin
    June 5, 2003 - 09:22 pm
    I noticed in Oriental Heritage that civilizations have a life span. They arrive, grow, mature, peak, decline, and die. Those characteristics are again evident in Greece. As we slip into the fourth century decline will become more and more evident. Corinthian capitals will appear in architecture but they are simply an embellishment of earlier designs. Sculpture will diminish into copies of earlier works. The chorus in Greek plays will diminish in importance and will later disappear entirely. Alexander will spread the Greek way of life to much of the known world in the fourth century but when he dies, the old ways will overcome the new. In the end Greece will continue as an amalgam but the civilization will be gone.

    Bubble
    June 6, 2003 - 01:31 am
    Robby there was a yearly sound and light program in situ retracing the fall of Massada to the Romans. I am sure it still continues. It was/is also attended by aspirant-army officers and that is where they were/are sworn in when they complete the course. My daughter was one of them when she was doing her compulsory 3+1years military service.



    In Jerusalem too they have such spectacles in historical sites.



    I remember the production of Aida in Gizah-Egypt near the pyramids a few years ago for commemorating the Suez canal anniversary. It was retransmitted world wide.
    Bubble

    robert b. iadeluca
    June 6, 2003 - 03:31 am
    "Music holds in the Greek drama a place second only to the action and the poetry. Usually the dramatist composes the music as well as the words. Most of the dialogue is spoken or declaimed. Some of it is chanted in recitative. The leading roles contain lyrical passages that must be sung as solos, duets, trios, or in unison or alternation with the chorus.

    "The singing is simple, without 'parts' or harmony. The accompaniment is usually given by a single flute, and accords with the voices note for note. In this way the words can be followed by the audience, and the poem is not drowned out in the song.

    "These plays cannot be judged by reading them silently. To the Greeks the words are but a part of a complex art form that weaves poetry, music, acting, and the dance into a profound and moving unity."

    Robby

    Malryn (Mal)
    June 6, 2003 - 08:24 am

    Picture of a scene from Aristophanes' Birds

    Malryn (Mal)
    June 6, 2003 - 08:27 am

    Structural Worksheet on Aristophanes' Birds

    Malryn (Mal)
    June 6, 2003 - 08:29 am

    Guide to Sophocles' Ajax

    jane
    June 6, 2003 - 08:28 pm
    Time to move over to a new discussion...

    "---Story of Civilization ~ by Will & Ariel Durant ~ Nonfiction~NEW" 6/6/03 8:26pm