Great Books Upcoming - Read Only
jane
October 12, 2001 - 05:55 am

Join us with suggestions for next discussion - HERE

EVERYONE is Welcome to join us!


We usually choose Great Books from one of the following collections:
Mortimer Adler's Great Books of the Western World
Encylcopedia Britannica's Great Books of the Western World
Harold Bloom's The Western Canon
Joan Pearson ~ Discussion Leaders ~ Maryal

We have already read and discussed the following titles in this series: The Odyssey, Othello, Jude the Obscure, Hard Times, Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, Portrait of the Artist, Absalom! Absalom!, Canterbury Tales, Animal Farm, The Brothers Karamazov, Beowulf, My Ántonia, Dante's Inferno, One Hundred Years of Solitude, Pudd'nhead Wilson, Saint Joan, Pygmalion, Middlemarch, Don Quixote, Woman in White

Other Great Books read and discussed on SeniorNet over the years: Elmer Gantry, The Good Earth, Grapes of Wrath, House of Mirth, Iliad, Julius Caesar, Madame Bovary, Magic Mountain, Rebecca, Rime of the Ancient Mariner

B&N Bookstore | Books Main Page | Suggest a Book for Discussion
We sometimes excerpt quotes from discussions to display on pages on SeniorNet's site or in print documents.
If you do NOT wish your words quoted, please contact Books.

Joan Pearson
December 4, 2001 - 06:51 pm
Hello, Great Bookies! We have set some dates and hope to have a nice selection of nominations from which to choose. We'll leave the nominations open until 12/19 and then vote until Jan. 1. That gives us a month to get ready. Plenty of time!

We left the chart here so you can see what the vote was like last time. We read Animal Farm and then Brothers Karamazov. Is anyone here still interested in the other selections on the chart?

As Brothers K drew to a close, there were several folks interested in reading Hamlet...is the interest still there? What a wonderful play that is! Chock full of so many of the famous lines...

I'd like to nominate Don Quixote today.. feeling a bit "quixotic", I am.

Oh, it's good to be back and look forward to hearing your familiar, friendly voices again.

What would you like to read?

ALF
December 5, 2001 - 07:44 am
I, for one, have never been an impractical romantic BUT if Maryal and Joan are leading Don Quixote, I shall follow.

Deems
December 5, 2001 - 08:16 am
What a terrific nomination, Joan. (No collusion here, folks. Joan and I have not discussed nominations.)

Although I was secretly looking forward to nominating Archimedes WORKS--from the Great Books list---I withdraw it in advance. (Chuckle).

I think Don Quixote is just what we need for the dark days of winter. The WHOLE thing, Joan? It is LONG.

FaithP
December 5, 2001 - 09:27 am
Don Quixote is a wonderful nomination. So is Hamlet. Oh dear she fiddled while the books yearned to be read. Should she toss a coin? Vote her conscience? Take what every the others decide? fiddle fiddle. Ok. Here goes. I vote no. 1 Hamlet no.2 Don Quixote. Can I change my vote. What are the rules. Fae

Barbara St. Aubrey
December 5, 2001 - 01:04 pm
Ok need to play devils advocate here - I am ready for something not so dark - I guess Quixote with all that prison stuff rape and mayham to me is like the Spanish Miserables - of course we could go darker still into Kafka - but what about Willa Cather or Hudson's Green Mansions or Thurber's Thirteen Clocks or one of Chaim Potok's books.

Deems
December 5, 2001 - 02:55 pm
Sarah--I also love Chaim Potok and especially THE CHOSEN and its immediate sequel, but I don't think they're "old enough" to make the Great Books list.

That's a strange list, by the way, including as it does all Western time, prose as well as poetry. There are some Very Odd choices on it. For example, "The Short Happy Life..." is NOT representative of Hemingway--or not so much as other works, AND it is a short story. I am most surprised that The Sun Also Rises is not on the list. It should be. Maybe also A Farewell to Arms and For Whom the Bell Tolls. If Hemingway is to be represented as a short story writer, then it had better be the brilliant Nick Adams stories.

I have lots more raging to do about the list, but it DOES give us a jumping off point.

I think I must be getting better--I am grumpy!

Interesting fact: Cervantes and Shakespeare were exact contemporaries. They both died in 1616. Shakespeare was born in 1564 and Cervantes in 1547, so Cervantes lived longer.

Maryal

Ginny
December 5, 2001 - 03:09 pm
Wow, Maryal!~

I've been longing for some beautiful writing, memorable phrases, stuff you can sink your teeth into. Shakespeare. Tennyson. Scott. I propose Richard III, there's a new book out on him, and he's supposedly not what he was reported to be. Al Pacino's unforgettable documentary about Richard III which I have on video is unbelievable as well as all the Richards of the past on film. Could be a total Richard Experience.

Or a Shakespeare history, any of them, or Hamlet, plenty of film footage in that one to add to the experience.

Something whose very phrases make the heart sing.

It's really really really too bad that the Genji is slated for March. That book, and its brilliant new translation lauded by every critic alive would be a feast of comparison of translations, there are three and all three differ. It's worth studying and very fulfilling.

Supposedly the first novel in the world, tho am not sure how they could make that claim, The 1,000 year old Tale of the Genji is marvelous, not a Great Book of the WESTERN World but certainly of any world.

I loved it and am on fire to read the new translation which is costly beyond imagining. The reviews are spectacular. Too bad it's scheduled for March instead of February because it sounds like something everybody would love, and the old translations are striking and cheap.

How about Ibsen? I nominate as well The Master Builder. Are you at all interested in making a theme of this? Plays? Comparing plays?

So many good books, and our Flagship, The Great Books, about to launch once again. A momentous occasion and cause for celebration, no matter what it chooses.

YAY!

ginny

Deems
December 5, 2001 - 03:17 pm
Ginny---In my book The Tale of Genji is definitely one of the world's great books. That list is so eurocentric.

I really think The Tale of Genji should be under Great Books.

My, I am quarrelsome and disputative today and getting more so because I cannot remember whether it's "quarrel" or "quarell." Think I'll go with the latter.

Richard III is an interesting suggestion. It is early Shakespeare, has some great speeches, but is really weird in a bunch of dramatic ways.

Now is the winter of our discontent

Made glorious summer by this sun of York.

Deems
December 5, 2001 - 03:20 pm
Barbara---Don Quixote is a romantic comedy---and more, of course. But surely not a book one would compare to Kafka.

Barbara St. Aubrey
December 5, 2001 - 05:51 pm
Just saw the play again - Don Quixote - and yes it could be funny but the surroundings - and his beautiful (oh y'all know I can't spell) Imesderella ( you know who I mean) but she is dreadfully treated - no I just don't have the stomach just now for all that rape and ugly as he tries to enchant prisoners regardless that the Don makes lemonade out of his lemons. There is enought mayhem in the world just now to add any more to my plate.

And Maryal I was suggesting Kafka as darker as the extreme, not as a comparison although, his irony always tickles my funny bone. Talk about being in a hall of mirrors and trying to figure out life - whew

Now the idea of Shakespeare sound great to me - a comedy like All's well that Ends Well or As You Like It or one centered in history like either of the Richards or how about a tragedy - The Tragedy of Coriolanus - or - Troilus and Cressida

I've never read Beckett either although is he also considered too new -

I also want to read The Tale of Genji - new translation in a slip case in two volumns available on sale now for $42. I can see that read taking at least 2 months if not 3 months. We are dealing with some heavy reading this spring with the Noble author starting in February - another reason why I would prefer something not so dreary - maybe that is the better way of saying it rather than using the word 'light' which can easily mean something we do not have to sink our teeth into.

Those authors that are not using archaic language make a read a bit easier and maybe that should be a consideration since there is so much heavy reading already scheduled for the spirng.

Brumie
December 6, 2001 - 06:20 am
This is my first post here. I love to read the classics! I've read just about all of Willa Cather's books - love her. You all mention plays by Isben - someone new to me. I love to read plays! I've read couple of Eugene O'neill's plays and enjoy him alot.

Deems
December 6, 2001 - 06:48 am
Brumie! --Welcome to ye. We all love to read and I'm happy you have found us. Feel free to nominate a book (check out Joan's new list in the link above).

The process we go through as we pick our next Great Book to read together is always fun. I hope that you will stay with us.

~Maryal

Barbara St. Aubrey
December 6, 2001 - 08:39 am
Interesting two very different lists of Great Books - Britannica doesn't even list St. Joan - so many books from an author featured and yet a shorter list of authors considered by Britannica to be Great.

Ginny what is the theme of Waiting for Godot - what would be a good companion piece - They say that Shakespeare had established all the story lines and character behavior of the human drama - is there a Shakespeare piece that would compliment Waiting for Godot?

I am just chatting about all this and not really suggesting lets do this or that - I am just hoping we had a bit of a chat about it all, rather than simply choosing a book plink plunk without a good chew.

Before I would go forward personally with Don Quixote please someone convince me that Dulcinea (thanks for the spelling Maryal) is not the town tramp, ill used by men and is made to be a paragon of virtue in Quixote's head or imagination.

Deems
December 6, 2001 - 12:31 pm
Joan--Depends on who's defining the first novel. Sometimes The Tale of Genji is called the first novel. I think Don Quixote, which has a number of complications of the novel, is the first Real Novel. And then there aren't any more for a couple of centuries. Odd, no?

Yeah, I'll go with that--DonQ is comic, sometimes darkly so, and sometimes extremely poignant, but it ain't no Brothers K (even that novel has funny parts).

Maryal

Hats
December 9, 2001 - 11:33 am
Hi Joan and Maryal,

I would like to nominate My Antonia.

HATS

viogert
December 10, 2001 - 11:14 am
This is my first contribution to the discussion. Could I make an objection to Shakespeare's Richard III please? Shakespeare's history depended on false reports after the Tudors grasped the crown - to which they were not entitled. Holinshed - where Shakespeare got his stories - receieved his information in turn from Moreton (of 'Moreton's Fork') who was a right Royal Tudor bootlicking gossip - as well as a right Royal pain in the elbow. Richard wasn't humpbacked, or a child-murderer - the history- books prove he was innocent without any difficulty. Richard was entitled to the throne as of right - so were the Princes, but Henry Tudor wasn't. This rotten play makes Richard look like a monster. Lawrence Olivier has a lot of answer for with that film he made.

Nellie Vrolyk
December 10, 2001 - 03:45 pm
I would like to nominate the following:

The Mill on the Floss by George Eliot

and/or

Great Expectations by Charles Dickens

I can think of half a dozen more, but I think I shall quit while I'm ahead

Joan Pearson
December 10, 2001 - 06:58 pm
There, all the book titles should now link to more of a description of the nomiations. Someone asked about Don Quixote...I think yes, the whole thing. There is a wonderful translation...the Raffel, where the link takes you. This is the Norton Critical Edition. You wouldn't have to read that...there are so many translations out there. As we learned with Brothers Karamazov recently, many different translations get us closer to the author's intent. We welcome different translations here.

The Shakespeare...well I'm a bit faithful to the Folger Editions...I work at the Folger and Barbara Mowatt who edits them is a friend of mine. So that's where the links take you for Hamlet, MacBeth. But again, same thing...different translations are most welcome and make for better discussion.

Marvelle
December 13, 2001 - 07:45 am
The Iliad is the beginning of Western literature. We see mythology as storytelling and ethos and Greek plays continue stories/characters introduced in the Iliad. Plus it's a darn good read.

The preferred modern translations are Lattimore or Fitzgerald.

Like Betty, I want to read all the books that have been nominated.

Now for the floating bodies topic I suggest a practical application of Archimedes theory, the mystery "Death in a Serene City" about Venice and saintly relics and the Isle of Bones. They don't float any finer than in Venice.

Marvelle

viogert
December 13, 2001 - 02:20 pm
A fine start though? - panning somebody elses suggestion - didn't mean to be rude & I apologise sincerely. (It's a knee-jerk with Richard III). I have never read any George Eliot & everybody who has thinks she's incredibly good - sort of genius-level. "Mill on the Floss" or "Middlemarch" would suit me & smarten-up my education a bit.

I found a great quote by E.M.Forster about Charles Dickens last week:

"Dicken's characters are animated by the authors own vitality so that they borrow his life & appear to lead one of their own".

Wish I'd said that.

Brumie
December 13, 2001 - 04:13 pm
I would like to suggest Les Miserables by Victor Hugo. I've seen the movie and tried to read the book but had some difficulty. However, it would be interesting to read it with a group.

Ginny: I'm a dog lover and sorry to hear that one of your dogs was shot in the face. GOODNESS. I have a l l/2 year old black lab named Andy. I've got him spoiled (couch dog!!!!!!).

FaithP
December 13, 2001 - 05:43 pm
Brumie I thing most books are more interesting, as is the process of reading, when reading in a group. Oh sure I read at least one book a week, they are the popular stuff my kids buy and give me mostly about lawyers and detectives. But, I truly enjoy the book club discussions the Most. fp

Marvelle
December 14, 2001 - 11:43 am
Fagles is a great translation for the Iliad. I hesitated putting that comment in about "preferred" trans -- I returned to college as a senior (yikes!) and graduated at age 55 with an English/Spanish degree. So I'm afraid I parrot a lot of my professors' opinions. For Homer, the translation was either Lattimore, Fagles (I'd forgotten about him), or Fitzgerald but my favorite professor confessed to a liking for Fitzgerald. I like Fitzgerald too because I believe -- and this is just my opinion, folks -- that only a poet can do justice in translating another poet.

I keep adding to my reading "to do" list everytime I check out Great Books. I've read Hugo but so many, many years ago that I have added him to the list. I would like to read all of the suggestions.

Marvelle

Joan Pearson
January 2, 2002 - 12:06 pm
Oh, I can hardly wait...let's start voting early ~ right now? The New Year brings new enthusiasm and excitement for what is to come...and you have provided so many great suggestions for the coming year...

Beowulf ~ new Heaney translation.
Don Quixote ~ Cervantes
Great Expectations ~ Dickens
Hamlet ~ Shakespeare
The Iliad ~ Homer
Les Miserables ~ Hugo
Master Builder ~ Ibsen
Mill on the Floss ~ Eliot
My Antonia ~ Cather
The Oresteia ~ Aeschylus
Richard III ~ Shakespeare
Saint Joan ~ GB Shaw


Aren't they wonderful nominations? Which are your top two choices? State them here in a post and they will be entered into the chart above...

And don't worry, we won't overlap with the popular on-line course just launched today. Will wait till it is over before beginning new Great Books discussion.
A Happy Happy New Year, Everyone!

Louise Licht
January 10, 2002 - 02:03 pm
Happy New Year to all!

My choices would be:

#1 The Illiad

#2 The Mill on the Floss

Lady C
January 11, 2002 - 02:33 pm
Found to my surprise there's more than one edition in paperback of this book. One has lot's of background material in it (with pictures) and is called "Beowulf: A Verse Translation" and includes an essay about critics by Tolkien. The other has side by side middle English and Heaney's translation. Splurged and bought both! Can't wait to read them!!!

ALF
January 12, 2002 - 05:47 pm
Wow Joan! More husband with less money, that's what retirement is all about.

I am taking a Shakespeare course online and I mean to tell you, I've got more questions about our wretched, Danish prince than I can type. I have questioned my common sense while reading Shakespeare if I should tackle Beowolf but with the 2 pros (as in professors and pros) I might make a stab at it. (oops sorry dear Hamlet, no pun intended.)

Joan Pearson
January 13, 2002 - 12:52 pm
ALF! It is your common sense approach to literature that makes our discussions sing...makes them MEAN something. You ask the questions that we can all relate to and that's what makes us comprehend what is really going on in the work. Don't stop, ever!

I have heard from several people who are interested in joining in the Great Books discussion...and am giving them directions to our place. Be prepared for a last minute shift in the vote. It is really, really, close this time!

Later!

Deems
January 13, 2002 - 01:54 pm
Hi Alf!---Ask me your two favorite Hamlet questions and I'll take a stab at them. Would it comfort you to know that scholars are not in agreement as to many points?

Joan Pearson
January 14, 2002 - 04:51 pm
It was close, but Beowulf has risen to the top. We are off preparing for the discussion right now and will let you know when the window dressing is complete. Maryal and I are hoping that all of you will participate in the discussion, even if your horse didn't win this time! It's been fun!

Joan Pearson
January 16, 2002 - 10:34 am
ALF, I'm going for the Seamus Heaney which has gotten all the rave reviews this past year. Wait till later today and the new Beowulf discussion will be up with a link to the B&N bookstore and Heaney.

Meg thinks the Heaney is TOOO modern, so I think it is a matter of taste. I'm really excited about the Heaney still however, from everything I've read. What are you going to read, Maryal?

Deems
January 16, 2002 - 10:55 am
Heaney here. I wouldn't miss it. The original poem is hard hitting and has harsh-sounding language and it seems Heaney has attempted to capture that.

Joan Pearson
May 3, 2002 - 04:33 pm
Butterfly, yours is the first nomination to go into the new chart! We will get started in earnest with the nominations on May 15, but you are free to nominate at any time, as Butterfly has done. All you need to do to get your nomination up in the chart in the heading is to write a post and we'll take it from there.

I thought Harold Bloom's list very interesting...many more titles included than Mortimer Adler's. You might get a kick out of the list.

Harold Bloom's The Western Canon

Deems
May 3, 2002 - 06:45 pm
Joan~~I find Bloom's list fascinating. He has the books broken down into countries and time periods. I checked the modern period (The Chaotic Age) and found that I agree with him on a number of choices.

One that he mentions quite often in his book on Shakespeare is Cormac McCarthy's Blood Meridian which my daughter has read. I've only read All the Pretty Horses. I'm not nominating at the moment, just commenting.

Maryal

Deems
May 7, 2002 - 06:28 pm
Because DQ has been nominated, I thought some of you might be interested in reading this article from The New York Times.

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/08/books/08QUIX.html

Many authors have selected it as the best novel of all time.

betty gregory
May 8, 2002 - 12:57 am
Interesting article, Maryal. I'd like to know what Isabel Allende's objection was.....possibly, that with 100 participants, the results wouldn't have any scientific significance. The results may not be representative of well known authors alive today, but they are still interesting results for these participating authors.

Did you know that a number slightly above 200 (something like 204 or 207) is the number a study has to have to come up with valid, representative, generalizable results? (To generalize to the rest of the population studied, so one could report..."ALL fourth graders..." or in this study, "Today's authors...") Any number above that does not increase the scientific validity and reliability of the results.

So, if you read that a study had 2,000 subjects, you'll know that the validity of the results were not increased enough by using that many people...they might as well have saved money and had just 250 participants. If you can imagine this charted on a graph, increasing numbers of participants in a study make a difference in validity of results up to just above 200. After that the line on the graph levels off dramatically. You know, I hated statistics class, but this one fact shocked me, stayed with me and still haunts me.

If you'll watch newspaper accounts of studies, this important requirement is never mentioned....and is not known to most of those writing the medical or science articles in regular newspapers. Ever seen an article that ends with...."Nevermind about these results...we didn't use enough subjects in the study, nor were they randomly selected, so the results are not valid." One exception to the 200 cutoff is in studies of new medicines where .0000001 difference might make a difference.....so 500 or more subjects are used.

There are other requirements, such as the random selection of subjects from a pool of representative subjects. I wonder if Allende disagreed with the make-up of the list of 100 authors asked to choose....not enough female authors, possibly?

So, (not that you want to hear this), the accurate announcement should have been that Don Quixote was chosen as the best work of fiction for those that answered the survey. (This doesn't represent what authors, in general, might have chosen.)

Betty

Deems
May 8, 2002 - 09:26 am
Betty~~~I agree with your analysis of surveys in general and their accuracy. What I found interesting in the Times article was that it was writers who were asked. Writers tend to have other writers that they admire and sometimes emulate. For example, if you took a survey of writers on their thoughts about Faulkner, you would get--I predict--a far more favorable result than if you examined the same number of readers.

What is astonishing to me about Cervantes is that he continues to delight (my students), just like Shakespeare whose contemporary he was.

ALF
May 8, 2002 - 11:05 am
Thank you Maryal for that information. Today my local book group was discussing this very thing as we kicked around Steinbeck novels for our next season to celebrate his centenniel.

betty gregory
May 8, 2002 - 03:58 pm
Oh, I see what you mean, Maryal....writers, not readers, asked. Since I love these kind of questions...about books, favorites, greats, etc., I'm always so disappointed that someone doesn't take the time to go the extra mile so the results can have some meaning. If it could be done again, let's see, I'd ask 400 writers, hope for a 50 percent return rate, then throw out a couple who didn't follow the directions. Maybe 180 final answers.....now, THAT answer would have good validity and reliability (you'd get the same answer again and again, no matter which 400 writers were initially surveyed).

Maybe this kind of question doesn't lend itself to such a test....maybe there are not that many "great" writers to be surveyed. Still, whoever determines the list of writers to be asked leaves themselves open to criticism. Still would like to know why Isabel Allende refused to participate. I've heard her speak several times and she is articulate, firm in a calm way, but fierce about the difficulties of female writers in the world of publishing and books.

Betty

Joan Pearson
May 17, 2002 - 12:12 pm
OK, let's go! We need to look carefully into the lists of Great Books to determine our next study. I can honestly say that I know Beowulf now, and will always look at heroism in a different way. You always select such interesting titles, and there is something new to learn, even if read and studied before. I cannot get over the content in some of the works that I read all those years ago? Was it there and I didn't notice because life experience did not yet make it relevant? (I know for certain that the bawdy Canterbury Tales were never included in the text I read in high school!)

Will you take a look at Harold Bloom's Western Canon? There is a broader selection, perhaps because Mr. Bloom doesn't wait the 50 years Mortimer Adler waited before determining which works would withstand the test of time. I like Harold Bloom's lists, but the great old ones appear on both lists. Let's look at both this time...

I would love to read Don Quixote, so will second the nomination. I also have become interested in Willa Cather. Her My Antonia has been nominated every time since we began to vote over five years ago, or was it six. I've never read it. I'd like to consider that again, so will put it on the list. So few women make the Great Books lists. I'd love to see what it is that puts it there on every list.

How about you? Is there something you have always meant to read? Nominate it!

I really love this whole process!

Joan

Brumie
May 17, 2002 - 05:11 pm
Hi Joan! I would like to nominate Robert Pinsky's translation of Dante's Inferno. I'm a Willa Cather fan!

Joan Pearson
May 17, 2002 - 07:25 pm
Hello, Brumie! Really? The Inferno? Are we ready for that? hahhaha...Okay, Dante it is!

Barbara St. Aubrey
May 17, 2002 - 07:37 pm
Oh yes I too like the idea of Dante - particularly Robert Pinsky's translation.

but I am going to make another recommendation as well - in fact two although one is related to the Cather book - an idea - after browsing the Bloom list this thought came to me - what would it be like to Read the Willa Cather book along with Kritin Lavransdatter (The Wreath) by Sigrid Undset - two different time frames but also two independent women when it was difficult for women to achieve the successes they both achieve - both living on the land - Kiritin almost a forshadowing of the type of women that would emmigrate to America from Europe.

Then the other recommendation again from Bloom's Chaotic century list - I have always wanted to read this and as I understand it - it is Italy's highest acclaimed story - a book that I understand is a bit of a toughie and probably not one I would ever tackle on my own. The Leopard by Giuseppe Tomasi di Lampedusa

Joan Pearson
May 18, 2002 - 08:06 am
Andy, we all know that about you! We'll vote after we get all the nominations up...come back in a week or so!

Barbara, Kristin Lavransdatter was probably my all time favorite when I was in my salad days. It would be interesting to read it again and see if I feel the same. With life experience, it may be even better! I remember many volumes, and guarantee that if we read the first, we'd have to keep going. The first is prelude to Kristin's life struggles. She is a young single girl in the first volume as I recall. The Leopard? I have never heard of it, but it sounds like something worthwhile. Thanks for providing the Amazon links in your post. In the heading here, all the titles are clickable links...to Barnes & Noble.

ALF
May 18, 2002 - 10:08 am
Nope! I'm not leaving and returning next week. I'm staying right here!

Nellie Vrolyk
May 18, 2002 - 07:01 pm
Good books each and every one.

I'll offer my choice from last time: The Mill on the Floss by George Eliot.

Hats
May 19, 2002 - 05:18 am
Hi Everyone,

I like Nellie's choice. I would like to read The Mill on the Floss by George Eliot. I bet Kristen Lavransdatter is interesting too. I just can not spell her last name.

Hats

Marvelle
May 19, 2002 - 11:57 am
I'd like to suggest two of my previous choices. First choice is Homer's Iliad -- the Great Mother Work of Western literature. My second choice is Aeschylus' The Oresteia -- about the unending(?) cycle of revenge; punishment; forgiveness; and the birth of justice.

Both works are easy reads and useful for catching the allusions of other writers like Wharton, Joyce, O'Neill ......etc, etc.

By the way, Cather is one of my favs. I particularly like The Professor's House for the way Cather induces physical as well as emotional responses in the reader.

Sorry to have been away for so long. I only intended a short break from Seniornet and the Net in general. I had an accident and am slowly recuperating (so please excuse typos!) It could have been much worse. Sub Specie Aeternitatis

I like the choices offered by everyone. I feel funny about making any suggestions at all since my posting may be limited. However, whatever work is selected, I can read, read, read!

Marvelle

Traude
May 20, 2002 - 09:20 pm
Joan, everyone, just made my way here and spent quite some time glorying in the contents of the links. And such great suggestions have already been made !

The Leopard is a historical novel by Giuseppe Tomasi di Lampedusa, a Sicilian prince, and describes the invasion of the island by Giuseppe Garibaldi (1807-1882) and its impact on a proud aristocratic Sicilian family devoted to the Bourbon Kings, before the final unification of Italy in 1861.



Joan, I too read Kristin Lavransdatter in my "salad days" long ago and was entranced by the story of Kristin from birth to death and everything in between in 13th and 14th century Norway. I remember even now admiring the husband, Erlend was his name I think, and siding with him, but I can't recall what for. Three books came out in succession, The Bridal Wreath (Kransen) 1920; The Mistres of Husaby (Husfrue) 1921, and The Cross (Korset), 1922.



I have the Robert Pinsky translation of The Inferno , the first volume of The Divine Comedy by Dante Alighieri. It is glorious.

Malryn (Mal)
May 20, 2002 - 10:38 pm
And, as Traude knows, I have the translation of Dante's Il Paradiso done by Marilyn Freeman, which you won't find in any bookstore anywhere.

Chalk me up for The Mill and the Floss, mostly because it's available on the web. I just finished reading Daniel Deronda, and I certainly hope it's better than that.

Mal

Marvelle
May 21, 2002 - 03:53 am
As usual all the titles are intereting. When do we start? How much time will I have to get the selection before we start to discuss? I haven't read any of Sigrid Undset so she would be a new experience. It could be fun to read her work in conjunction with Willa Cather.

My liftetime of reading was self-directed, voracious but spotty. My late entry into college gave me some structure and the courage to read Ancient Literature in translation (too late in life to learn the Ancient Greek language!)

Suddenly I understood allusions in my favorite modern writers, allusions which had only confused and frustrated me earlier. Edith Wharton's House of Mirth has a section where the main character Lily is pursued by Furies. Wharton doesn't explain the Furies since it alludes to The Oresteia . (See Barnes & Noble description of the work in above heading)

A simple, short allusion, like the Furies, expands without effort the depth of a reader's ubderstanding, and adds layers of meaning to a work. Of course, someone like T.S. Eliot drives me crazy. His excessive allusions are a mix of classical lit, works of his contemporaries, and references that today are obscure! Another story. Maybe some expert on Eliot could do a group read of him sometime in the far distant future, but not a current book suggestion.

Marvelle

Joan Pearson
May 21, 2002 - 08:03 am
Traudee, I'm happy to see you have found your way here and enjoyed Harold Bloom's Western Canon.

Mal, I'm not sure about all the titles on Bloom's list, but just about all of the titles on Mortimer Adler's list of Great Books are available electronically. ALL of the works that we have read/discussed here in Great Books so far were...we always put a link to the etext in our Great Books discussion headings.

Marvella, I do believe what you say about understanding the allusions in later novels after reading the oldies. Your enthusiasm for THe Oresteia is contagious!

When do we start? That's a good question. By June 1, we'll have the final vote on the coming discussion. Then we need to open the discussion and Maryal and I need to put our heads together to decide on the approach. It's possible that we could be ready by June 15, depending on the choice. It would probably be better to wait til July 1. Any preferences one way or another? When we did Absalom! Absalom (Is that right? I never spell it the same way twice!), we decided to do a Faulkner biography first. I think it really helped to understand the influences on the novel, without having to stop and research the author as we read. If we did doMy Antonia, would you be interested in doing a biography of Willa Cather first? An interesting character herself!

Traude
May 21, 2002 - 10:27 am
If I may : The Oresteia and/or The Iliad would take us back to the Greeks and tothe Trojan War.

The Oresteia is a drama = the only extant trilogy of Greek drama, and consists of Agamemnon, The Libation Bearers, and the Eumenides --- all those doomed denizens of the House of Atreus : Orestes, Iphiginia, Electra et alii . Remember Eugene O'Neill's take on this in his Mourning Becomes Electra .

Would we be reading the entire trilogy ?



The same question arises with the Inferno. That's the first part of The Divine Comedy , the others are Purgatory (Il Purgatorio) and Paradise (Il Paradiso) .

Would we read only The Inferno or the entire work ?



Not too long ago the fine Norvegian actress Liv Ulman set out to produce a film version of Kristin Lavransdatter , a story ovbviously very dear to her. Not being a movie buff, I have no idea whether that came to fruition.

KL is an epic story set in 13th and 14th century NORWAY ; the main protagonists are Kristin and Erlend. But there's much more than their love story (God and how I loved them both). Sigrid Undset (Nobel Prize 1928) was a convert to Catholicism, and that is reflected in this extraordinary tome.

I don't have the time to make suggestions now - why, my hospital bag isn't packed yet, but let me simply MENTION he following :

Franz Kafka (1883-1924) : The Metamorphosis, a novella, and the allegorical novels The Trial, The Castle ; and

Thomas Mann (1875-1955) : Death in Venice .

In great haste.

Marvelle
May 21, 2002 - 05:29 pm
Appreciate the timeline. That gives me time to order the book(s) to have on hand when the discussion starts.

For The Oresteia, I suggest the trilogy which is equivalent to a fairly short to moderate length novel. The three parts work as one. Also, there are many lovely graphics on the Net that can enhance the reading!

A biography first of an author, especially our Willa? You betcha! I'm such a fan -- I have a framed 8x10 photo of her wearing an outrageously sumptuous fur coat, playing the journalist -- which she was -- by talking into one of those weird old fashined phones. I also have an art print that she originally gave to a friend of hers during the time Willa traveled in New Mexico on writer's research. The print is a subtle, disturbing critique of male-female positions in society. I don't know anything about the European (I believe) artist. Neither the print or photo are valuable, you understand, but they bring me closer to Willa!

A biography on any of the authors would be useful. With The Oresteia there could be perhaps a book/article on Greek theatre or Edith Hamilton's Mythology.

If reading Dante's Divine Comedy: I've read the 3 parts and -- I guess it's the devil in me -- I found Hell to be fascinating.

Marvelle

Carolyn Andersen
May 22, 2002 - 02:57 pm
Traude, Liv Ullmann's version of Kristen Lavransdatter (The Wreath) is generally regarded as a flop. The acting is good, though Ullmann did not play in the film herself.(She was the director.) And some of the photography is superb. But the editing was hopeless, making the action boring and extremely hard to follow. Hope it didn't put the younger generation off from reading the book, which of course is excellent.

All the nominations so far are exciting. As usual, I'll be glad to follow along with whatever is finally chosen.

Carolyn

Deems
May 22, 2002 - 06:25 pm
If we decide to do the Oresteia, I think we should read all three plays since it is a trilogy and it doesn't take that long to read a play.

If we read the Inferno, I'd just as soon pass on the Purgatorio and the Paradiso. Have read them, but don't much want to again. Pinsky's translation sounds interesting.

Maryal

Joan Pearson
May 23, 2002 - 02:02 pm
Carolyn, it's a good thing you told me about Kristen Lavransdatter, the movie, because I have beeen tempted to rent it several times. Oh, I'd hate to see a bad production of that wonderful book.

You know, I just noticed that GB Shaw's play, St. Joan is not up there. It's a tradition that I nominate it each time. Charlie used to always kid me about it. I will have to put it up for old times' sake...and yes, I'd still like to read/discuss it too! A GB Shaw biography might be fun too.

hahaha...Maryal, so you'll pass on Paradiso and Purgatorio and head straight to Inferno, eh? What a gal!

Deems
May 23, 2002 - 02:32 pm
Joan~ Believe it or not, St. Joan is the play for USNA in the Fall, and I'll be teaching it. Sooooooooo.....I second the motion.

(looks like I'm gonna be voting for St. Joan OR the Purgatorio. Hehheh.)

Francisca Middleton
May 23, 2002 - 03:11 pm
I confess that I rarely post, but I DO read. What usually happens is that I do get the book or books under discussion AND read them, but get caught up in other things and fail to take part in the discussions.

However, I really appreciate the stimuli! At any rate, I became intrigued by the thought of the Norse stories by Sigrid Unset and have just bought the Wreath. It looks like it will be a great book for a nine-hour flight, and that's how I'll be using it. Maybe, just maybe, this time I'll take part...although now it sounds like another book will be chosen for the discussion.

So be it! Once again SeniorNet Books have done their work..I'm being introduced to something absolutely new to me.

FranMMM

Kathleen Zobel
May 26, 2002 - 07:08 pm
It's been many books back since I participated in these discoussions and I have missed them. With all the lovely empty white squares on my calendar for thenext three months I'm free to read and discuss.

I have been wanting to read something by Harold Bloom for sometime, so my suggestion is to persue Joan's suggestion for one of Harold Bloom's books

Justin
May 26, 2002 - 08:40 pm
I'd like to try one of Joyce in the group.Ulysses perhaps. I know it's difficult but this group could cut it down to size and doing it would be such an accomplishment. If the choice is not something of Joyce, then I tend to endorse Willa Cather's My Antonia. I am choosing Cather's work because so much of the west given to us by American novelists has been about the role of men and most of these men are really cardboard characters- cheap imitations of Owen Wister's Virginian. It will be a pleasant change to examine the role of an immigrant woman pioneer in Nebraska in the eighties when most Nebraskans were living in soddies.

Justin
May 26, 2002 - 08:50 pm
Let's toss Chaim Potoc's The Chosen into the brew. It's one I have always wanted to read but have not done so. I hear it is a worthwhile story.

Joan Pearson
May 27, 2002 - 05:48 am
Fran, you will LOVE Sigrid Undset...I just know it!

And look who's here with white spaces on her calendar! Kathleen, it would be wonderful to have you join us...I'm wondering how many white spaces you have if we decide to go for Justin's suggestion, Ulysses! Do you remember how long it took us to get through his slim Portrait of An Artist? hahahaha...

Justin, I do admire your confidence in our intrepid band of readers...the title is up there in the chart. I'm afraid The Chosen, has not yet made its way onto the Great Books lists we must go by...give it another 25 years! You might "toss" the title into the SN Suggestion Box though. Oh dear, there's no link in the heading here...I'll go get one now!

Deems
May 27, 2002 - 05:55 pm
Too bad "The Chosen" hasn't made it yet. It is a wonderful book. Maybe we could do Ulysses--I have NEVER read it before. I've started it (as in first hundred pages) several times, but always wanted to be part of a class that was studying it. It is very long and fairly difficult but just maybe.........We would have to have some rules about not bringing too much from the Internet into the discussion since we would have to deal with the writing itself, I think, and figure it out.

Anyway great to see Fran of the many Ms, Kathleen,Justin and Robby putting their two Euros in.

Joan~~what do you think? Ulysses certainly should go into the voting pool. So it's long; so it's hard. Don Quixote is long too although not that hard.

Maryal

Joan Pearson
May 27, 2002 - 07:19 pm
Maryal, after we did The Odyssey, I was ready for Ulysses...there were three or four others too...Kathleen, were you one of them? We voted for Othello instead...I stopped into the Folger Shakespeare Lib. to see if there were any materials on this play...bought a Folger edition of the play, and in 15 minutes, they hired me! It was unbelievable. That was in 1997!

In the years since, Ulysses was nominated several times. Once we decided to do Portrait of the Artist to get our feet wet. This was so autobiographical that we kept veering off into other sources on Joyce's life. Ulysses is the same in that there is a biographical thread...but you're right...we'd have to ignore that and stay with the story. I have a cute thing on Ulysses somewhere let me go find it.

Robby, you are right, Ugly American would be a good read...topical. You ought to put that into the Suggestion Box to see if there is interest in it. Would you be interested in leading it?

Back in a minute.

Joan Pearson
May 27, 2002 - 07:34 pm
hahaha...this doesn't look TOO hard, does it?

Ulysses for Dummies

betty gregory
May 27, 2002 - 07:43 pm
Hahahahahaha hahahahaha hahahahahahahaha

Love the peeing scene!

Betty

Traude
May 27, 2002 - 07:44 pm
That would be a colossal undertaking. It is a tome of 800 + pages. It is demanding and initially confusing - it was for me some years back. Also exhausting.

The book covers the events of just one day in the life of 3 people - and that's the only narrative sequence right there; tours of Dublin are matched by inward journeys with pages and pages of stream of consciousness wanderings full of stimuli and responses. Some passages are like a movie reel, naturalistic, taking note of the smallest detail from a newspaper ad to bodily functions (often in obscene terms - it was banned here until the early thirties). All of it is an exploration into language itself and contains slang of various origins.

Joan Pearson
May 27, 2002 - 07:45 pm
Betty, I suspect it is a guy thing...

Traudeee, Ulysses is among the top of just about every list you'll ever see as the BEST novel ever written. If it is TOO hard, how can you explain this?

Traude
May 27, 2002 - 08:11 pm
Joan, it's been said that to fully understand Ulysses one must at the very least be familiar with the theology of the Roman Catholic Church, the history of heresy, Irish legend, European history, mythology, astronomy, Hebrew, Latin, Gaelic, and Gypsy slang. As the title implies, there is a close parallel with characters from the Odyssey (e.g. Stephen is related to Telemachus and Molly Bloom to Penelope); commonplace occurrences of Bloom's day echo episodes from the Odyssey, but there is a complex network of literary and historical allusions, and each character is associated with many other figures as well.

Joyce said - and I don't have the exact quotation - that he put many puzzles in this book(which took him seven years to write) so that the academics would forever keep guessing as to the meaning, and he, Joyce, would thus be assured of immortality (!)

Barbara St. Aubrey
May 27, 2002 - 09:18 pm
I loved every bit of our foray into A Portrait of a Young Man - I also think that was one of Joan's shining moments as well, in that people drifted in and out of the discussion that had so many allusions and yes, a knowledge of the Catholic Church was valuable but so much of the Irish Catholic Church is of its own cult that the internet was a handy tool -

All in all to say that so far we have been exploring and I am so much more excited about exploring another author at this point rather than honing in on any one particular author by reading additional works by any one of the greats.

Now I could see us someday having a special discussion devoted to exploring all the work of one author - example have an exploration of Sir Walter Scott; Somerset Maugham; Guy de Maupassant; Mark Twain; James Joyce; Shakespeare; Dickens; Tolstoy; Eliot; Austin - or, or, or - on and on - the exercise could be a great introspection into the soul of an artist and an opportunity to see the authors growth as well as, detect the author's maturing writing skills.

And so where I have no doubt that together we could tackle Ulysses I would rather read one more of the other Great authors.

Deems
May 28, 2002 - 11:40 am
I'd like to nominate MOBY DICK. A fine novel, full of oddities, stong narrative line and much more.

Joan Pearson
May 28, 2002 - 01:53 pm
Will you ever forget the Inferno scene in Portrait of the Artist? Traudee, you'd have to add Dante to the list of resources for the reading of Ulysses! I think that's what Maryal is advising...if IT is to be Ulysses, then we will have to restrain ourselves from going off for seven years researching all references...and try to follow the story line...

Barbara, I know what you mean...so many authors, so little time!

Maryal, Moby Dick is up there in the nominations chart. What an impressive list! I want to read them all!

Robby, thanks for the heads up on the link in the suggestion box. It's working now. Please put Ugly American in the box (with your offer to lead it). You are right, it is not a GREAT BOOK, and so it wouldn't be discussed here, but it would make a "lively" discussion led by a master provocateur!

Traude
May 28, 2002 - 07:10 pm
Ulysses.

Let me make it clear that I do not mean to discourage anyone from undertaking this effort, and a major one it is, one that will take a considerable amount of time and might lead one to a virtually endless number of tangents and references.

Speaking strictly for myself, I have to say 'been there, done that'; I don't want to revisit all the puzzlements and eternal searches. Vita brevis , life is short, and there are so many great books still to enjoy, most of them much more readily accessible than Ulysses.

Just my opinion.

PS. Now where is the suggestion box ?

PPS. Do the Archives contain a record of each and every book discussed here since the very beginning ? I wondered about that wheb Carol Shields' STONE DIARIES was mentioned elsewhere recently.

Lastly : Ooops -- The Iliad is mentioned twice in the header.

Elizabeth N
May 29, 2002 - 08:34 am
I cast a vote for Kristin Lavrensdatter; it will wring your emotions dry--there is nothing intellectually distant about this monumental classic.

Traude
May 29, 2002 - 11:13 am
Here's my vote for Kristin Lavransdatter.

Barbara St. Aubrey
May 29, 2002 - 01:45 pm
Well I'm caught between three this time - The Leopard Pinsky's translation of The Inferno and Kristin Lavransdatter

Usually we have a #1 and #2 till we get closer to a votable number and so for me to reduce my three to two is going to be such a challange. At that point what ever we read will be great.

Found these two sites that I thought were interesting for the Kristin Lavransdatter voters.

http://www.sel.kommune.no/reiseliv/attraksj/engelsk/kristin.htm

http://search.eb.com/nobel/micro/733_70.html

Marvelle
May 29, 2002 - 02:38 pm
Thanks, Barbara for mentioning 2 votes. Even so, choosing is difficult. If only one vote counts, so be it.

#1 is The Oresteia, a tale of murder, revenge, guilt, punishment, forgiveness, and justice. Wonderfully entertaining and a good follow-up to Crime & Punishment but an easy read, not sad, and with forgivenes as an added ingredient.

#2 is a harder choice. Personally, I love Don Q and Leopold Bloom, and dear, wooden Ahab and I re-read these books every year. But...great books yet less time-consuming -- Cather, Shaw, Eliot. Okay. my #2 is Mill on the Floss, a book I read ages ago, remember little except that I enjoyed it and would like to revisit that experience.

I'm willing to read whatever is chosen, however.

Marvelle

Traude
May 29, 2002 - 07:46 pm
Joan, I hope I was not premature with my vote.

To ease the quandary in which we may find ourselves, would it help to briefly outline the perceived essence of some of the books ? May I try ?

1. The Oresteia ( 3 plays) and The Iliad need no further description. Joyce's Ulysses is, may I say, a semi-dependent companion as far as Greek mythology is concerned.

2. My Antonia, Mill on the Floss, and Moby Dick are home grown and do not need any further description either.

3. Dante's Inferno is in a class by itself. Pinsky's new verse translation is the latest and judged the best. The epic narrative contains XXXIV Cantos and runs to 373 pages. The Italian text is on the left, the English rendition is on the right. The introduction describes the various circles of Hell, and there are over 50 pages of notes in the back.

4. The Leopard is concerned with Italian history and specifically with the island of Sicily and its many transient conquerors through the ages, peoples' inevitabale accommodations to their rule, and at last the fierceloyalty to the House of the Bourbons just before Italian unification.

5. St. Joan is in a class by itself as a play.

6. So of course are Cervantes (1547-1616) and Sigrid Undset (1882-1949). He wrote of his time, and she wrote about medieval Norwegian history.

antoinette
May 30, 2002 - 05:25 pm
recommend kristen lavransdatter - the wreath; and, di Lampedusa - the leapord.

antoinette

Joan Pearson
May 31, 2002 - 09:01 pm
antoinette! We are so happy you found your way to us and hope you will be here no matter which title is selected. We always manage to have a good time.

TODAY we begin the vote! We will pare the list down for the next three days and then will have a run off vote for the top choices. The first vote is usually all over the board.

HEEEEEEEEEEEEERE WE GO!

betty gregory
June 1, 2002 - 02:18 am
My Antonia by Cather

Betty

Joan Pearson
June 1, 2002 - 04:24 am
Good morning, Betty. Do you have a second choice you'd like to register? I'll put your first choice up there right now...

Hats
June 1, 2002 - 04:31 am
Good Morning Joan and Maryal,

1) Mill on the Floss

2) My Antonia

Hats

Brumie
June 1, 2002 - 05:41 am
Morning! My first choice is The Inferno and second Kristin Lavransdatter l The Wreath.

BaBi
June 1, 2002 - 05:44 am
1) "The Leopard". I haven't read this one and it sounds like one not to be missed.

2) Shaw's "Saint Joan". Shaw's wry social commentary always makes good reading and good discussion.

I tried reading the Lavrinsdotter book once, and couldn't get interested in it for some reason. Something was turning me off, but I didn't stop to analyze why. ...babi

Marvelle
June 1, 2002 - 06:19 am
Sorry for the premature votes in message 182.

#1 The Oresteia

#2 Mill on the Floss

Marvelle

Joan Pearson
June 1, 2002 - 08:08 am
You are early birds! Betty, Hats, Brumie and BaBi, Marvelle your choices have been entered into the chart. Once we shorten the list, we'll have a run off. Stay tuned...this is a horse race!

Elizabeth N
June 1, 2002 - 08:20 am
Kirstin Lavransdatter and The Leopard. I had no idea what The Leopard was about until today but from the description it looks fascinating. I have a granddaughter in Sicily with the US Navy and I will recommend the book to her!

Deems
June 1, 2002 - 09:27 am
Ahhhhhh time to vote. I've been debating with myself, but I'll put The Inferno #1 and St Joan #2.

Barbara St. Aubrey
June 1, 2002 - 11:30 am
Ok finally made my difficult choice - I really want to do Inferno but I am thinking -- A Summer Read??!? -- naww but a perfect fall read - and so #1 The Leopard and #2 Kirstin Lavransdatter

Malryn (Mal)
June 1, 2002 - 11:50 am
1. Mill on the Floss
2. Saint Joan

Francisca Middleton
June 1, 2002 - 02:02 pm
Since I've already bought the Wreath to read on a long flight, I put that number one (and will hope to be back for the discussion).

I'm torn about #2...but will come down on the side of the Leopard.

There! I've done it.

FranMMM

Joan Pearson
June 1, 2002 - 02:28 pm
This is extraordinarily difficult isn't it? I'm going to have to commit sooner or later...I'll say My Antonia first and Saint Joan second...

Elizabeth, Maryal, Mal, Barb and Fran...your choices are recorded. Very interesting...and still a horse race!

Kathleen Zobel
June 1, 2002 - 04:38 pm
Vote: 1. The Leopard 2. Oresteia

Nellie Vrolyk
June 1, 2002 - 05:33 pm
My first choice: The Mill on the Floss.

My second choice: The Iliad.

ALF
June 1, 2002 - 06:13 pm
I know that I said I would join in regardless of the choices but I would like to vote for My Antonia for #1 and St. Joan for my #2 choice.

The Fickle One

Joan Pearson
June 2, 2002 - 04:28 am
Thanks, all. We are making progress, here. kathleen, Nellie and Andy, your choices have been entered into the chart. Andy, that's good to know.

Stay tuned...

Deems
June 2, 2002 - 11:50 am
Hey, Joan, check it out! St. Joan has 5 FIVE big votes for second choice. Maybe we could talk everyone into reading it (a play for a summer read) and you would at last get your wish!

Justin
June 2, 2002 - 01:31 pm
First Choice; My Antonia

Second Choice; Mill on the Floss

Joan Pearson
June 2, 2002 - 07:36 pm
Justin, your vote has just been registered in the heading. Thank you! If we do My Antonia, would you be interested in reading a biography first? I'll go scout them out, just in case...

Maryal, if we did St. Joan that would be great = you'd have next semester's lesson planning well on the way! Do you think we could persuade Charlie to come in and do that one with us?

ALF
June 3, 2002 - 10:28 am
Oh Joan, yes-- let's ask Charlie. We can grovel and beg him for his attention.

Faithr
June 3, 2002 - 02:46 pm
Mill on the Floss and second: St. Joan Faith

Joan Pearson
June 3, 2002 - 06:34 pm
Faith! I was looking for you! Will put your choices up there right now...

Andy, I can't imagine you grovelling!

Traude
June 3, 2002 - 07:37 pm
Joan,

this is going to be a head-to-head finale, mamma mia !

Please tell me whether the support for Kristin L. I expressed earlier in posts counts or whether I have to declare myself again.

How long did you say we have ?

Joan Pearson
June 4, 2002 - 03:31 am
Traudee, your first vote has been entered. We'll keep the first round open through Wednesday and then I'll email you all to cast final run off votes by Sunday pm...

Mama Mia!

ALF
June 4, 2002 - 05:03 am
Oh yes, I would Joan. To get Charlie back in our fold I'd grovel, beg, plead, weep, sob and promise my first born .

Joan Pearson
June 5, 2002 - 01:47 pm
>They're off! The starting bell just rang...this one is so close, I wouldn't be surprised if we needed a third vote! It wouldn't be the first time that happened. A whole new contest. Same as before, register your first and your second choice. I'll recognize your vote in a post when it goes up. If you don't see your name, speak up!

This is so much fun!

Malryn (Mal)
June 5, 2002 - 02:39 pm
1. My Antonia
2. The Mill on the Floss

Mal

Traude
June 5, 2002 - 03:15 pm
My choices :

1. Kristin Lavransdatter

2. The Leopard

Joan Pearson
June 5, 2002 - 03:18 pm
Early birds! Mal and Traudeee, you choices are up there!

Traude
June 5, 2002 - 05:07 pm
It seems my previous P.S. message never made it. When I tried again, I found the web inaccessible. Happily, I am back now.



Since the vote is so close, may I mention once again that Kristin Lavransdatter is a trilogy and The Bridal Wreath is only the first volume (of 260-some pages). I don't know whether this will influence those who voted for Kristin L. before, but I thought it worth bringing up again in the interest of fairness.

My own vote remains unchanged.

Nellie Vrolyk
June 5, 2002 - 07:05 pm
My votes:

1. The Mill on the Floss

2. Kristin Lavransdatter 'The Wreath'

Barbara St. Aubrey
June 5, 2002 - 07:06 pm
#1 The Leopard

#2 Kristin Lavransdatter

Marvelle
June 5, 2002 - 09:07 pm
I haven't lost interest or forgotten Great Books but I'm tugged this way and that by the choices. Will vote soon.

Part of the delicious problem of choosing is Barbara's "The Leopard" suggestion. I checked out the links for book and author in Harold Bloom's "The Westen Canon" given in the heading. Now I'm hooked on reading that book! What a magnificent undertaking of the author, late in life, coming to peace with himself and his ancestors through the process of writing this novel. My grandparents were freed serfs and I've heard many stories of their near starvation once freed and kicked off the land. "The Leopard" is a chance to see what happened to the 'other side' following this social upheavel.

Now I've added this book to my list and have 3 books to consider in my final decision.

Marvelle

P.S. Just saw the 2 video set of "The Tree of Wooden Clogs" about turn of the century Italy and the life of 'owned' peasants. This Italian film won the Grand Prize at the Cannes Film Festival and I highly recommend it. There was a movie made of "The Leopard" with -- I think -- Burt Lancaster. Don't know if its good. I tend to read a book first before I see the movie.

Faithr
June 5, 2002 - 09:43 pm
Faith says post her vote thus: The Mill on the Floss Second choice St.Joan.

Joan Pearson
June 6, 2002 - 05:43 am
Your votes have gone into the charts thusly...Nellie, Barbara and Faith, but Marvelle, though you certainly sound drawn to The Leopard, will await your final decision.

Traudee, we had decided to read only volume one, but who knows? We could choose to go on together if by popular demand. I can guarantee that everyone will want to read more after the first volume...

Marvelle
June 6, 2002 - 09:58 am
#1 The Leopard

#2 Mill on the Floss

Marvelle

Traude
June 6, 2002 - 10:57 am
Joan,

mea culpa, mea maxima culpa for not having realized that ONLY Volume One of Kristin L., i.e. The Bridal Wreath, was being considered for nomination.



I do not believe that it is possible to do justice to this important work by discussing only the first volume, and I hereby withdraw my nomination.

ALF
June 6, 2002 - 11:05 am
Traude: I can take back my vote any time I choose. After all "I do live in Florida."

Traude
June 6, 2002 - 11:10 am
Gosh Alf, you sure made me feel better.

Thanks loads.

Joan Pearson
June 6, 2002 - 03:49 pm
Okay, let me see if I have this straight...
Marvella has made up her mind, cast her vote and it is now up on the chart.

Traudee has cancelled her vote, and both first and second choices have been removed from the chart in the event that The Leopard may now become her first vote. YOU MAY recast your first and second choices.

And Andy has announced her right to take back her vote, when she has not yet cast it! Andy, you voted before the run-off and this is a whole new vote among the top five. YOU don't have anything to take back, Madame, but you certainly may vote by Sunday pm.

Any questions?

Justin
June 6, 2002 - 04:07 pm
My Antonia; First Choice Mill on the Floss; Second choice

Since I do not live in Florida, I cast my ballot with assurance that it will be counted.

antoinette
June 6, 2002 - 05:48 pm
first, the wreath, kristen lar.-----second, the leapord, di lamp.

Joan Pearson
June 6, 2002 - 06:22 pm
Justin, your Floridian vote has been successfully punched...and antoinette, yours has been recorded too. Thank you!

Elizabeth, of course Kristin Lav. is still up there. One vote was "uncounted" because we have not committed to reading/discussing all five of the volumes here. Will watch for your vote...

ALF
June 6, 2002 - 07:32 pm
I puch my chad for My Antonia and for 2nd choice I will go with Saint Joan.

Or is it St. Joan the one asking for the vote? I'm confused.

Elizabeth N
June 6, 2002 - 08:51 pm
1) The Bridal Wreath
2) The Leopard

Jo Meander
June 6, 2002 - 10:17 pm
Can't resist! Have to vote:
(1) My Antonia
(2) Kristen Lavrensdatter (How long is the entire work? I'd rather read it all.)

Joan Pearson
June 7, 2002 - 03:06 am
OKKKKKKKKKKK, the following votes have been punched clear through and recorded: Andy, Elizabeth and JO. Things are starting to happen!

Traude
June 7, 2002 - 08:24 am
Please permit me a few more words about Kristin Lavransdatter


This is a trilogy with

Volume I THE BRIDAL WREATH

Volume II THE MISTRESS OF HUSABY

Volume III THE CROSS



It is a historical novel set in 13th/14th century Norway and a moving, enduring love story. When I read it (in the German translation), I was no longer a wide-eyed impressionable teenager but in my first year at university---still impressionable of course. And I loved the book.

With special permission from the local library I was able to take out this trilogy, which is part of the library's special collection and not part of the circulating "stock". The English translation is by Charles Archer (with J.C. Scott for vol. I).

It was not my intention to throw in the towel - that's not like me. Rather, I feel that reading only ONE volume of a trilogy, ANY trilogy, or even a tetralogy, would/could not possibly provide a full picture of a respective book; by doing so we might be short-changing ourselves. Forgive me, but for me it's either everything or nothing; I don't believe in half-measures.

Deems
June 7, 2002 - 08:34 am
Time to vote again:

My Antonia --1
St. Joan -- 2

betty gregory
June 7, 2002 - 12:14 pm
My Antonia...1st

Mill on the Floss....2nd

Betty

Faithr
June 7, 2002 - 01:02 pm
I am changing my vote so we can have a unanimous verdic..No. 1 choice is My Antonio by Cather and No. 2. is Mill on the Floss. faithr

Joan Pearson
June 7, 2002 - 04:32 pm
Now, I have inserted three first choices for My Antonia, two second-choices for Mill on the Floss and one second for St. Joan - for Maryal, Betty and Faith.

By the way, there is to be a movie about Jeanne D'Arc on CBS Sunday evening...great actors, Peter O'Toole...and an actress whose name escapes me. I didn't recognize the actress who plays Joan...very young.

pedln
June 9, 2002 - 07:30 pm
I loved My Antonia. That gets my first vote. The Norweigian in me puts Sigrid Undset second, have never read it.

Joan Pearson
June 9, 2002 - 07:46 pm
Pdln, You made it under the wire...if Antonia holds up through the night, will have a bunch of questions to put to you in the am. Thanks!

antoinette
June 9, 2002 - 08:15 pm
first -the wreath second - the leapord

ALF
June 9, 2002 - 08:45 pm
Quite a day I've had. I not only watched Part I of Joan D'Arc but I've started My Antonia. I have it on electronic text and it's wonderful. It remind me somewhat of Grapes of Wrath so far.

Traude
June 9, 2002 - 08:59 pm
Gosh,

if it isn't too late, I will throw my hat in the ring once more for The Bridal Wreath, volume I of Kristin Lavransdatter.

Carolyn Andersen
June 9, 2002 - 10:09 pm
If this is under the wire, I'll record a choice of My Antonia first, Kristin Lavransdatter second.

Carolyn

Joan Pearson
June 10, 2002 - 08:21 am
...AND THE WINNER IS...
MY ANTONIA


Thank you all for participating in this! Yes, Traude, antoinette and Carloyn, your votes were counted!

Is there any interest amongst ourselves to read a biography of Willa Cather BEFORE we get into the novel? I think that worked out very well when we did that with Faulkner before he read his novel.

What do YOU think? What we decide here will determine the start date for the novel, tentatively scheduled for July 1.

betty gregory
June 11, 2002 - 12:57 am
Joan, even though I asked about a biography of Cather, now that I've spent some time reading about several possibilities (Hermione Lee who wrote such a fine biography of Virginia Woolf and 2 others, one who lived with Cather for years), I am having a very strong reaction to what little I've read. I definitely don't want to read about Cather before reading My Antonia. I've never had this reaction before, but I fear reading about the personal life of Cather will completely change my reading experience of the book. It's been a while since I read My Antonia, but I've recently read Death Comes for the Archbishop and O' Pioneers. There is a wholeness to each of her books....maybe that's an additional reason I don't want anything else to influence My Antonia.

Betty

Joan Pearson
June 11, 2002 - 04:00 am
Betty! Thank you so much for spending time looking into the Cather biographies and for sharing that important viewpoint. I've never read My Antonia, and have always marvelled at the fact that most lists of Great Books, excluding Harold Bloom's Western Canon include such a wee number of women. I'm curious to see how Willa broke into this elite circle- but do not want her biography to influence our reactions to the book! A concern is that we veer into biography WHILE discussing the book, which often happens here. When Charlie lead the Faulkner biography discussion before we attempted Absalom! Absalom, I felt it was beneficial to the book discussion. Especially following our experience with Portrait of an Artist which sent us scurrying into biographical research, with the turning of each page!

I value your counsel against reading a Cather biography BEFORE we read the novel that has become part of the Western Canon. What do you think of the idea of reading a biography AFTER we complete the novel?

ALF
June 11, 2002 - 06:03 am
Personally, I like the idea of becoming acquainted with the author prior to reading the story.

Harold Arnold
June 11, 2002 - 07:25 am
My first choice from the list is St Joan, by G Bernard Shaw. My second choice is none of the above.

I would like to see a discussion centered on 4 to 6 of Shaw’s plays. In addition to St Joan I would add Caesar and Cleopatra, Major Barbara. Man and Super Man (including the seldom performed play within a play, Don Juan In Hell). and Pygmalion,

That would be quite a package. Go for it Joan!

Deems
June 11, 2002 - 09:03 am
For those of you who would like to start reading before we start reading or perhaps just to bookmark the site, here is My Antonia online with the most readable type I have found:

http://www.willacather.org/MyAntonia/MyAntoniaHome.htm

I have also checked several other online texts. This one has the great advantage of loading only one chapter at a time. It also has a few notes, such as the pronunciation of "Antonia," a bohemian name accented heavily on the first syllable. AN Toe nee a.

I vote to read the novel. There is biographical information available on the internet that gives the basic facts of Willa Cather's life.

Maryal

Malryn (Mal)
June 11, 2002 - 09:18 am
Click the link below to access a very good online version of My Antonia.

My Antonia

Marvelle
June 11, 2002 - 08:07 pm
I might have experienced what Betty did with Willa Cather biographies although I have found two books I recommend. I'm sure there are more.

Part of the distaste I felt with certain biographies is that the female author uses the subject, in this case Willa Cather, as a soapbox on which to stand and preach on gender, sexuality, politics -- ho hum. I'm not interested in her agenda even though I do like to support women authors. I'm interested in Willa Cather and not the biographer.

I do recommend "Willa Cather: A Literary Life" by James Woodress. B&N has it in paperback form -- hope I spelled Woodress correctly. Another book I like which isn't as readily available is "Willa Cather: A Critical Biography" by E. K. Brown and Leon Edel" Leon Edel did such a grand job with the life of Henry James and his writing is wonderful. I would like to read a biography before the novel but everything depends on the readability of the biography.

Marvelle

betty gregory
June 12, 2002 - 05:03 pm
Oh, this is too funny, Marvelle. If there is one thing that drives me crazy about traditional biographies about women (usually written by men, but some women, too) is that they do not address the important "gender, sexuality, and politics" issues in women's lives...quotes around your words. (Choice of career, marriage decisions, self image, etc.) Those who do (such as Hermione Lee on Virginia Woolf) are finally writing about the lived lives of women, as explained by Carolyn Heilbrun on writing about women's lives, not how women measure up to patriarchal expectations.

The break from traditional biographies began (writes Heilbrun) with Nancy Milford's biography on Zelda Fitzgerald in 1970. Before that time, biographers had written that Zelda destroyed F. Scott Fitzgerald. Nancy Milford documented that the opposite happened, that F. Scott, by treating Zelda and what she wrote as his property, destroyed her. She deteriorated emotionally and mentally and spent the rest of her life in a mental institution. Carolyn Heilbrun explains this better than I can in her Writing A Woman's Life, a book on women's biographies and other things to do with women and writing (including ways for women to write their own script as they live it).

Sorry, Marvelle.....you inadvertently landed on my favorite book in the world....Heilbrun's book. I am still learning how an author should and shouldn't write a biography of a woman.

Betty

Marvelle
June 12, 2002 - 09:57 pm
Wow, so w're having problems with a biography on Willa Cather for entirely opposite reasons (I think -- but I'm unsure why you had such an adversion to the bio you read). From the Cather bios I've read that were written by women I'm turned off when they don't explore her art or technique; they don't see her as a writer but instead use every opportunity to talk about lesbianism and the politics involved therein. Or they only explain her art in terms of being a gay woman as if she were that one dimensional. In other words there is no balance between life and art; the human being and the writer.

It's beginning to sound to me as if a book length bio may not satisfy although I'm willing to read whatever is on the agenda. What do we do now?

Marvelle

betty gregory
June 13, 2002 - 04:41 am
Marvelle,

To answer, "What do we do now?"....I saw that Joan set the start date for July 1st and was responding to you under the assumption that she decided no biography would be read by the group before discussion of the book. So, I was responding to you about biographies in general.

It might be fun to read several biographies of Cather after discussing My Antonia, then compare notes (reading one biography each).

Sorry that I didn't make it clear why I didn't want to read a biography before discussing My Antonia. I wrote in my post that I thought it would interfere with my reading the book. My reason was not about what we've just been discussing. I saw from reading several reviews of several biographies that this is a very complicated woman with many troubles, controversies, and one particular sentence somewhere said how different she is from her body of work, blah, blah, blah.....I just started to get this picture of all those personal details getting in my way. I can't think of another time when I felt this way.

Marvelle, much of what you listed would bother me, too. I guess I think of each biography subject as separate from everyone else, so including lesbianism could be appropriate for one and not for another. And, as far as including literary criticism, doesn't that depend on the purpose of the book? I thought that some biographies are designed to include it and some are not....like the several recent biographies on Iris Murdoch. This would be a good place to say what a beginner I am on knowing all the things that make up a good biography.

Recently, I've been reading about many different biographies of Winston Churchill. One of the things I'm learning is that there are different kinds of biographies. One biographer of Churchill has devoted his life to writing an 8-book biography. Then he wrote a very successful book about the process of writing the 8 books and another one-book summary of Churchill's life! Another biographer has written 2 of a 3 book biography and people are worried that he may not have enough time to complete the 3rd!

I wish I was better prepared to explain what I think of as a biographer's traditional perspective of a woman's life. A memory from a class discussion on this topic is a quote from a biography, an interpretation by a male biographer about why the woman never married....that she was not pretty enough. My memory is that the biographer spent much time interpreting the personal side of a life and had very little to say about an involved career. One other example I remember reading was of a biographer questioning a woman's morality because she divorced her husband. Surely, these were biographies from the 30s or 40s. (The class was 13 years ago.)

What would be a contemporary example? I assume there are many subtle ways of imposing a traditional framework on a woman's life. Maybe that would be the way a biographer chooses what to include as well as interpretations of what is included. Do you include an abortion? Can you include it without falling into value-laden interpretations? If you're writing about a female author who used a pen name in 1890, should you comment on how difficult it was for a woman to be published? What about a letter written by the subject that describes beatings from a husband, but the biographer knows the subject never left the husband.....oh, mercy, this gives me heartburn, thinking about a biographer who means well, but knows nothing about physical abuse.

Another example to think about would be all the books written about Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt and the treatment given Franklin's affair with Lucy. We could discuss this for a year, probably, wondering about how a biographer should handle what is known about Eleanor's pain, decisions, perspective, relationship. Maybe this is why only a handful of people are thought of as excellent biographers!

I feel like I've just begun to learn about biography. Carolyn Heilbrun's very small book, Writing a Woman's Life is not a quick read, is complicated but clear and, as many times as I've read it, I'm still trying to absorb and understand it.

Betty

Joan Pearson
June 13, 2002 - 05:03 am
I agree with you and we will proceed with the discussion of the novel on July 1 and during the course of the book discussion, when and if comments on the author's life arise, we'll scoop them all up to discuss AFTERWARDS. If there is enough interest in going on with a biography discussion, we might all agree to do this too. Perhaps the WILLA CATHA story will make as lively a discussion on its own as ANTONIA's.

We are working on the new discussion this afternoon. Am looking forward to this! Harold, you are on for Shaw's St. Joan. Let's see where we are at the end of Willa and will talk then? I've been out of town, taped Part II of the movie and plan to watch it tonight. Look forward to your comments on that!

Thanks for the links to the on-line Antonia. Will incorporate them into the heading of the new discussion.

betty gregory
June 14, 2002 - 05:07 am
Pardon me, please, for taking this liberty to continue our side discussion of the current evolution in biographies of women, but I've run across an example that's haunting me. So, while we're still in pre-discussion mode, I wanted to tell Marvelle what is happening in the ongoing Books and Lit discussion of Galileo's Daughter.

The author, Dava Sobel (who also wrote Longitude) has written this remarkable history/biography of Galileo, organized around surviving letters written to him by his oldest daughter Virginia, a Catholic sister of the Poor Clares order, San Matteo convent near Florence, Italy. Her new name after entering the convent was Maria Celeste. Many hundreds of letters passed between father and daughter, but only 124 of her letters survive. It is guessed that Galileo's letters held by Maria Celeste were burned shortly after her death, possibly because of the danger they posed. (Galileo's support for the sun-centered-world theory kept him in trouble with the powerful Catholic church which believed the earth stood still as the sun and other planets revolved around it. Others had been executed for professing another belief.)

The compelling heart and energy of this book is the worship-like love and support Maria Celeste had for her father. She was involved in his scientific work, read all his books, copied records in her beautiful longhand, discussed his extensive travel plans.....all through letters.

The personal, day-to-day context of her life at the convent is not the emphasis of the book and is given no importance by the author. We are half way through our discussion of the book and this almost silent undercurrent of the book has dominated our attention. Or, more specifically, the decision to live at the convent has dominated the discussion.

Virginia (Maria Celeste) has a sister one year younger and a much younger little brother. All three were born out of wedlock to Galileo's mistress. Since the 2 girls are "illegitimate," they are not eligible for marriage. Galileo completes some paperwork (church? state? not sure) for his son to be legitimate, so his future can be normal. That option didn't exist for the girls (we're assuming.)

Since the girls will not be able to marry, Galileo puts them in the San Matteo convent near Florence at ages 13 and 12 and that is where they spent their lives. The picture we have of Arcangela, the younger sister, is one of unbounded misery. She is often ill. In today's thinking, she would be called clinically depressed.

The Poor Clares order (still functioning all over the world today) required poverty and deprivation. Part of the religious duties required the sisters (convent sisters) to continually ask others for financial support ("alms") by writing letters. Maria Celeste asked for money from her father in almost every letter, thanked him profusely, repeatedly, for his contributions. Occasionally, she made it clear that there was rarely enough food on hand at the convent.

The convent sisters were required to be uncomfortable in their deprivation and were often cold in winter, especially as they were required to be barefoot on cold stone floors as they awakened at midnight to begin praying. Just before dawn, they were permitted to sleep for a short while before the day began.

Our thoughtful discussion has looked at both sides of Galileo's decision to put his daughters in a convent. One way of viewing his decision is to see him as selfish and a poor father. Another way is to see that he had little choice, that many of Italy's young girls were put into convents at the time.

Also, Galileo's financial contributions to the convent could be seen in two ways....how supportive he is OR how awful it must be for Maria Celeste to have to ask for money in almost every letter.

Continued in the next post.

Betty

betty gregory
June 14, 2002 - 07:16 am
It wasn't until yesterday while reading a post in the Galileo's Daughter discussion that it dawned on me that the author, Dava Sobel, read through all Maria Celeste's letters to her father and saw only love and devotion to her father, which is the premise of the book....that Galileo's difficult political life was made easier by his daughter's constant support. This is a very traditional way to view a woman's life....seeing only what she is able to do in support of the important men in her family.

The members of our discussion, from the first day, have been concerned with more than Galileo's needs, especially since, first, the fate of two very young girls was involved and, second (possibly), the pitiful living conditions of the Poor Clares was difficult to ignore. That led us to a discussion of whether or not Galileo was a selfish man and poor father. We were somewhat constrained by not knowing if any other living possibilities were open to women who could not marry.

I'm only in the middle of learning about traditional ways of viewing women's lives for biographies and the evolution toward the new biographies of women. I know the new method includes more reality (lived lives) and higher value placed on women's needs.

In rereading the first chapter of Galileo's Daughter, I was surprised to read about Galileo and Maria Celeste, on page 9,

"No detectable strife ever disturbed the affectionate relationship between Galileo and his daughter. Theirs is not a tale of abuse or rejection or intentional stifling of abilities. Rather, it is a love story, a tragedy, and a mystery."

I'm curious about her words "...tale of abuse or rejection or intentional stifling of abilities..." I wonder if she is trying to head off this particular criticism. Hmmm.

Yes, of course, this is primarily the story of Galileo and not a biography of a woman. What caught my attention, though, was that the author looked at the letters and saw one thing, a traditional thing, and our discustion group looked at the same letters and saw something else. We paid attention to more than just Galileo's needs.

I hope I have fairly represented our ongoing discussion. I tried to give the major points equal weight....which is how it feels in the discussion, equal. Also, I hope I've conveyed the constructive search accurately. There is nothing wrong with having two sides of an argument....but in this particular discussion, it doesn't feel like an argument.

Betty

angelknutson
July 30, 2002 - 12:03 pm
I have been away for several months. Taking a home study course for PT Aide, and started a new job. My 72 yr. old sister had open heart surgery. She would have died in less than a year had they not done the surgery when they did. She's fine now. Anyway, I'm trying to get myself re-involved on Seniornet. What are we reading right now? When did you start, and when is te finsh date? Thanks. Leann

Ginny
July 30, 2002 - 05:52 pm
Hi, Leann, and welcome back, we are so glad to see you again, the Great Books Group has about 2 weeks to go in My Antonia, which they are enjoying very much, it will run thru August 15, I believe, and if you have it, I'm sure they would love for you to come in the next two weeks, even to say hi to the gang! Just click on Books & Literature on top of this page and GASP at all the offerings!

I'm happy that your sister came thru the surgery well and proud of you for your new job!

The Book Club Online is about to start Amy Tan's Bonsetter's Daughter and it's SOME book, about mothers and daughters and a whole lot of other things, and Great Feuds in History is about to start up too and they say it's super, please look around and find something you like, we're so glad to see you again!

ginny

angelknutson
July 31, 2002 - 06:04 am
Thanks Ginny for your help and for your warm welcome back. You're the best Ginny. Have a great day. I think I just might have to try the Bone Setters Daughter. Thanks again. Leann

Ginny
July 31, 2002 - 06:05 pm
Well bless your heart, Leann, what a nice thing to say, and I see you're already posting in the Bonesetter's Daughter to Lorrie's delight so I would say your homecoming is complete!

So good to see you again,

ginny

angelknutson
August 1, 2002 - 08:23 pm
Ginny, it's fun to be back, and I'm really looking forward to posting and reading this book. I started it last night. Take a peek at the new site Joan set up for me. Painting Garden Rocks. Some of you just might enjoy this hobby, and maybe make a little cash too.

Deems
August 10, 2002 - 03:10 pm
Hi, Mal~~I can't answer your question. Joan is going on vacation shortly after we finish My Ántonia. Then we go through the process of choosing the next book. People nominate; we vote; often there's a run-off vote.

As a wild guess--October maybe?

Joan Pearson
September 15, 2002 - 10:15 am
Just put up a clear nomination's box...the floor is all yours. Will you nominate a Great Book that you would like to read/discuss together? Would love to hear from YOU!

Deems
September 15, 2002 - 06:38 pm

Faithr
September 16, 2002 - 10:59 am
St. Joan by B. Shaw is a good choice. Lets see though what others come up with. I will be here what ever it is. Faith

Joan Pearson
September 16, 2002 - 01:56 pm
Hello there, Foi! Good to hear from you. I agree, it would be great. I wonder if we can find a good companion piece for the play...maybe a biography of G B Shaw...he was an interesting character. This play was written in 1923. I wonder if Willa Cather ever saw it performed. She was quite an avid theatre-goer, drama critic...

Faithr
September 24, 2002 - 06:05 pm
No doubt in my mind that WC saw this play. By the way where is everyone.....Faith

Elizabeth N
September 24, 2002 - 08:23 pm
I went to the LiteraryCritic web page and found a list: Larry McCaffery's 20th C. Greatest Hits (100 English-Language Books of Fiction). It looks so interesting--not boring. The first six are Pale Fire by Nabokov, Ulysses/Joyce, Gravity's Rainbow/Pynchon, The Public Burning/Coover,The Sound and the Fury/Faulkner, Trilogy/Becket.


About The Public Burning/ Robert Coover 1977 it states: A book controversial enough that its publisher almost immediately took it out of print (where it stayed for over 15 years), this novel featured a surprisingly sympathetic Richard Nixon as its principle narrator and used the Rosenberg case as a means of examining just about everything worth examining about America during the McCarthy era; excessive and encyclopedic, dazzling in its range of styles, bitterly angry and bitingly humorous, this is the most brillian and original"political novel" ever published in America. The web page of the list is www.literarycritic.com/mccaffery.html


I nominate The Public Burning by Robert Coover

Barbara St. Aubrey
September 24, 2002 - 09:17 pm
Joan after the fiasco this summer I hesitate to even make a suggestion - I read the first 6 chapters of Willa Catha and then the summer took over with family and all sorts of goings on - I never got back to finishing the book - I've a busy next few months so what ever you choose if I have time I will join. Since I cannot promise to post regularly I really do not think it is fair for me to make my suggestions. I should have more time after the holidays and so the next read, that I am imagining will start some time in January, I will be here with bells on.

kiwi lady
September 25, 2002 - 12:45 am
I nominate "To the Lighthouse' by Woolf because the author was such a complex person. I would like to have the authors biography to refer to as well.

Carolyn

Joan Pearson
September 25, 2002 - 02:56 am
Fai, we're here...just tending to the change of the seasons.

Barbara, we are looking to the day your new computer is all finally "hooked" and you come back to us. Have been there and know what you are going through!

Elizabeth, that sounds like a great book! Will it stand up over time to become one of the Great Books of the Western World? It needs another 25 years prove itself. There were other names on that list...Faulkner, Joyce, Becket who have passed that test. Do any of them interest you?

Carolyn, I've entered To the Lighthouse into the running. A biography would be fun. Same with Shaw's - or another play along with it? Pygmalion?

Faithr
September 25, 2002 - 10:44 am
Joan I was going to suggest reading the play Pygmelion for the same discussion as St. Joan. Two very different "stories", and we could discuss Shaws treatment of them. Also like the idea of the biography and still think it would have been a good thing to have done along with My Antonio by Willa Cather, to read her biography. I have found out from my brother by the way, that the Stuart relatives also tried Nebraska plains but moved on to Oregon. That great grandfather finally found a good place at Mt.Vernon to plant his apples. He grew several varieties he had shipped to him from British Isles. Faith

HarrietM
September 25, 2002 - 11:27 am
I love the idea of Shaw's St. Joan and Pygmalion. Joan and Faith, what a neat, fun idea!

Is there a possible target date yet for discussing whatever Great Book selection is eventually chosen?

Harriet

ALF
September 25, 2002 - 12:17 pm

Joan Pearson
September 25, 2002 - 12:51 pm
We're not voting now, guys! Just taking nominations. Target date...hmmm...either Nov.1 or the 15th...depending what the final choice is and how much prep time it will take...

Nellie Vrolyk
September 25, 2002 - 01:42 pm
This is still one of my favourite books, so I will nominate it again:

The Mill on the Floss by George Eliot.

betty gregory
September 25, 2002 - 02:16 pm
The 1999 Virginia Woolf: a Biography, by Hermione Lee, received unanimous rave reviews, New York Times Book Review Editor's Choice (plus, see Amazon's 12 commercial reviews) and is the biography Woolf scholars have been waiting for. There are previous biographies from the period of time when studying the Bloomsbury group was in vogue, none with very good reviews, one or two based on out-of-date rumors with scanty resources.

Almost all of the reviews of the new Hermione Lee biography report that Lee avoids all previous biographies and goes back to the original writings of Woolf. There are volumes and volumes of her published letters and diaries....I have 3 volumes of her letters and have only scratched the surface. (Do I remember that only a 1/10 of her letters have been published so far?)

The Lee biography of Woolf is almost 900 pages long. I have it and am about a third of the way through it....it's so beautifully written and organized. I had put off getting it because I had read so many of her diaries and letters, but, oh, I'm so glad now I finally bought it. I notice in Amazon that used paperback copies are available for $8 and $9, a lot less than I paid for mine.

Even if we don't end up reading To the Lighthouse, I urge you to think about reading this remarkable story of a remarkable woman. If we do read To the Lighthouse, there are various ways we could use the biography without everyone having to read all 900 pages. Or, we could read it all, since To the Lighthouse is barely 100 pages, as I remember.

(I can also suggest this biography in our biography discussion group, but I'll wait to see what happens here.)

Betty

kiwi lady
September 25, 2002 - 09:02 pm
I have just searched our library catalogue but they don't have the Lee biography of Woolf but there are several others. Its listed but it says there is no copy available which means they may have had it and someone has not returned it so its missing.

I loved Pygmalion - we did it at school. I am going to read To the Lighthouse anyway.

Well must go two fluffy white balls are looking for their dinner!

Carolyn

ALF
September 26, 2002 - 08:00 am

Joan Pearson
September 26, 2002 - 02:47 pm
hahaha, Andy, I didn't want everyone to get on the bandwagon, start voting and stop nominating. No harm in rooting for your favorite early on though.

Betty, that sounds like a really wonderful biography! One I would like to have. IF we do Woolf, we'll have to look into finding inexpensive editions for everyone. Will note Hermione Lee's work. Thank you!

Nell, Mill on the Floss has been entered. I'm curious to hear what it is about this novel that attracts you. It's not the kind of thing I associate with your taste...or is it?

Marvelle
September 28, 2002 - 09:55 am
I'm still interested in "The Oresteia" the short triology about murder, revenge, punishment, forgiveness and justice. So I'll nominate that again.

I've only read Shaw's "Superman" which I liked although the characters were types rather than fully dimensional people. Shaw was an interesting man, some would say a strange man, and I would to see a good biography on him but I'm hesitant to discuss any work which has an emphasis on religion or politics. It could be dangerous. I'm sharing this quote which I just received:

"People are always blaming their circumstances for what they are. I don't believe in circumstances. The people who get on in the world are the people who get up and look for the circumstances they want, and if they can't find them, make them."

- George Bernard Shaw

Marvelle

Marvelle
September 28, 2002 - 12:45 pm
MARYAL, you'll have a suggestion for a Shaw bio if "Saint Joan" is chosen or perhaps it'll be "SJ" and "Pygmalion"? A quick search revealed the following on Virginia Woolf and George Eliot. The first link is a long article which discusses Woolf first and then Eliot.

Complexity and Contradiction:
Virginia Woolf & George Eliot
by Brooke Allen

George Eliot Biography

Review of 'The Real Life of Mary Ann Evans'

I went to university at a late age so my college times are still fresh. Studying "To the Lighthouse" was a transcendent experience. Am anxious to hear NELLIE's thoughts about "Mill on the Floss." I'm not suggesting a biography on Eliot, there could be better ones out there, but I ran acoss this interesting review of one and wanted to share it. Both Woolf and Eliot were fascinating women.

Can you guess that I can't choose between any of these writers yet?

Marvelle

Marvelle
September 28, 2002 - 03:29 pm
Sorry for writing one post after another but I realized I did a poor job of nominating "The Oresteia". The author is Aeschylus of course and there are a number of fine translations available at B&N -- Hughes, Fagles, Lattimore are the ones I remember offhand.

For information about the trilogy CLICK HERE

Marvelle

Joan Pearson
September 28, 2002 - 03:45 pm
Marvelle, your nomination has been entered. Thanks for the extra information...Aechylus is a familiar Greek...but have never had the opportunity to read The Oresteia. Always enjoy these pre-discussions because there are so many titles that I wouldn't consider reading on my own. Thanks! We'll look at the possibility of a biography once we've made the selection. Good to hear from you!

Malryn (Mal)
October 4, 2002 - 10:10 am

For various reasons I must read books on the web. I love many of Shaw's plays; read them all one summer as a teenager and re-read them later. Saint Joan is not available on the web, so I nominate Mill on the Floss which is.

Mal

Joan Pearson
October 4, 2002 - 12:54 pm
Mill is already up in the nominations table, Mal. Nellie nominated it. Maryal and I will be back to this discussion in a few weeks. Getting ready for the National Book Festival and other demands, but all nominations will make it to the table and be considered when we get back.

kiwi lady
October 5, 2002 - 11:45 am
If we can't do To The Lighthouse I would second The Mill on the Floss. We did it in school and we had the most marvellous teacher.

Carolyn

BaBi
October 17, 2002 - 11:21 am
I am a George Eliot fan, and would be very interested in a discussion of Mill of the Floss. It has my vote. ...Babi

Deems
October 17, 2002 - 01:11 pm
Hi Kiwi and Babi (it was fine meeting you in DC). Thanks for the nominations. When Joan gets back from her trip, I'm sure we'll have the voting so check in again in a couple of weeks.

Meanwhile, anyone have some more nominations?

Maryal

Roseda-f-Ok
October 20, 2002 - 08:58 am
I just finished a book I would recomend, The Secret Life of Bees by Sue Monk Kidd. I read anything I am handed by my lovely sister, a former school teacher of remeadiable reading in a large high school. One of the first books I seen read in this folder was Bee Season and I loved that book (I just this day read this folders first section and skipped to this end part) I will check this folder often now I know it is here,,, thanks

Malryn (Mal)
October 20, 2002 - 10:29 am
I nominate Mill on the Floss.

Mal

ALF
October 21, 2002 - 06:25 am
Hello Roseda: An email is forth coming. Are you new to our site? Welcome to Great Books and any of the Books/Literature discussions. Is the book your sister gave you about Bess Truman? Is it a bio?

Deems
October 21, 2002 - 08:13 am
Hi Roseda, Good to see you. The book you recommend needs to be recommended for reading in another discussion. It certainly does sound interesting.

ALF will help you out, I'm sure.

Hi Mal--It's up there on the list, The Mill on the Floss.

Roseda-f-Ok
October 21, 2002 - 08:55 am
Guess I didn`t understand as I think all books are great and you should see the books I have. I collect dictionarys and though my spelling has fallen along the way ( age does that) LOL I read everything some one puts in my way. The fact I didn`t go to college until I was in my 40s and only got 32 hours in the hat for a degree I now take non graded classes when I have the time. We raised our 4 children on books and they all read, plus 32 foster boys and 4 girls and most of them also learned to love books.

Deems
October 21, 2002 - 09:01 am
Roseda--I certainly agree with you about books. And I am dismayed to learn that spelling may deteriorate with age since I'm not now and never have been much good at it. I have all sorts of problems with double letters (whether or not to double a letter).

The Great Books Discussion is limited to books that are considered "classics," and I think that the most recent ones on the list go back to the 1940s. If you click on the lists above in the heading, you will see what we are choosing from.

Anyway, it is wonderful to see you.

~~Maryal

betty gregory
October 21, 2002 - 11:53 am
Maryal, the generic and popular term "great book" makes the name of this folder (file?) not very user friendly. No matter how carefully worded a response is (and yours is always a model to follow), it still means someone's book wasn't great enough.

I always meant to tell you that even after I was aware of the first classics list in the heading, I still didn't realize that I had to choose from that list. Has any thought been given to naming this file "Selections from a Classics List" or whatever, something that conveys a pre-selected list from which to choose? Or....some eyecatching, oversized signal in the heading that states that, in this file only, the selection must come from a list.

A final thought. "Classics" is less generic than "great."

Thoughts from others on this?

Betty

Jo Meander
October 21, 2002 - 11:55 am
I do think that would be clearer!

Ginny
October 21, 2002 - 12:38 pm
My understanding of the reason for the title "Great Books" for our Great Books Series, is the famous series by that name Great Books of the Western World (see the heading above):


We usually choose our Great Books selections from Adler's


GREAT BOOKS of the WESTERN WORLD


OR


Encylcopedia Britannica's Great Books of the Western World


But


You might want to spend a little time here ~


Harold Bloom's The Western Canon


from which the members of this group try to select those books recognized as such, (just throwing this in as explanation for the words "Great" Books).

Now "Canon," there is a REAL problem word, I would have a lot of problems if this group suddently decided to call itself the "Canon" Books hahahahaah

Just throwing that out FYI, I leave the rest to Maryal and Joan P when she returns, I'm sure they are interested in all comments, it's an interesting subject and has come up before.

ginny

Deems
October 21, 2002 - 03:46 pm
WOW a discussion when Joan is out of town. Clearly, we must await her return before we discuss possibilities for changing the title. I admit that "Great" Books is confusing to many people. It is easy to think of the "great" as in "Read this book; I thought it was great."

And, as Ginny suggests, there is a real problem with the word "canon" even within my discipline where a battle rages as to what should and should not be in the canon, books that have been enshrined among the very greatest, ones that everyone should read, and so forth and so on.

When Joan returns, we can take up this discussion again. By the way, for all those interested, Bloom's list above is far longer and more inclusive than the top two lists. And it comes up closer to our present day.

Maryal

Deems
October 21, 2002 - 04:35 pm
Take a look at the Bloom link, especially part 3. He picks books which he thinks likely to be classics, dividing them geographically. On this list, you find books published as late as the 80s. (There may even be some in the 90s, lot of books here.)

Books that I'd like very much to discuss, Pynchon's The Crying of Lot 49 (1966), Walker Percy's The Moviegoer (1961), Morrison's Song of Solomon (1977), and that magnificent postapocalyptic novel, Russell Hoban's Riddley Walker.

I enjoy reading "classics," but more modern potential classics such as the books above, would also be interesting.

I almost put Cormac McCarthy's Blood Meridian (1985) in the paragraph above, but it is probably too violent and unremittingly bleak for our audience.

Maryal

ALF
October 21, 2002 - 08:03 pm
Every season my local book reading group chooses one of the publications from The Great Books Foundation. Last year, Clashes of Culture was one of nine volumes in the Great Book's Foundation's 50th Anniversary Series, inaugurating the next half-century of thoughtful discussion about outstanding works of literature. Many groups have expressed these choices to be "the most meaningful reading experience ." They use the shared inquiry method to maintain the flow of ideas with their questions. They are the ones who chose the selections and dubbed it Great books. Some are, some are not. An enjoyable read is like beauty, it's in the eye of the beholder. Who cares what it is called? A good group becomes a community of minds, sharing perspectives, questions, insights and challenges. That's what makes it a great book to me.

Jo Meander
October 21, 2002 - 09:52 pm
Alf. sometime would you explain the shared inquiry method?

betty gregory
October 22, 2002 - 12:47 am
Just adding the word "list" to the file name would help. Then, in the heading, assume that something needs to catch the eye of a first-time visitor. I was also thinking that the word "classics" would rarely be misunderstood, but again, if the selection is meant to come from a LIST, then "list" should be part of the title.

Betty

ALF
October 22, 2002 - 07:52 pm
The shared Inquiry method of reading brings together works from around the world that speak to others re. a theme of universal human sugnificance. A shared inquiring discussion begins with a basic interpretive question- a genuine question about the meaning of the selection that continues to be puzzling even after careful reading.

We each offer different possible anwers to the question, and our leader asks questions . In these shared inquirty discussions we, as readers, think for ourselves about the selection and don't rely on critical or biographical sources outside the text for ideas of meanings. The discussion remains focused on the TEXT and the evidence for opinions we look for in the selection. There are no correct answers, just encouragement from others to express opinions. It is open and spontaneous, a common search for undrestanding that leads to a closer and more illuminating reading. Shared Inquiry foster a habit of critical questioning and thinking. It encourages patience in the face of complexity and a respect for the opinions of others. As participans , we explore the work in depth, try out idas, reconsider simple answers and we synthesize interpretation. Over time, shared inquiry engenders a profound experience of intellectul intimacy as our group searches together for meaning in literature.

Jo Meander
October 24, 2002 - 04:46 am
ALF, your description of the method suggests that you foster freedom of thought and expresssion, probably making participants feel more relaxed as they engage in the process. I really like sticking to the text! Thanks for the info!

ALF
October 24, 2002 - 03:50 pm
When you read a novel don't you foster your own freedom of expression and thought?

Everyone refers to the "text" but we all have a different perspective. Don't you think that if 5 people read the same text, there would be 5 varied opinions and attitudes about the identical words?

BaBi
October 25, 2002 - 03:07 pm
Alf, I think a printed text is at least less open to conflicting interpretation than, say, something seen or heard. You can misunderstand what you heard, and differ greatly with another on what you saw. With the written word, there is at least a reference to correct any obvious errors or misunderstandings. How many different opinions there are about it would probably be directly proportionate to how vague, or precise, the words were, don't you think? ...Babi

ALF
October 26, 2002 - 08:26 am
Well, yes Babi but when we voice our opinion we still refer to the "text." You are right of course as interpretations can be as vague as the paragraph.

Justin
October 27, 2002 - 10:00 pm
I am pleased to see that the voting is still open. I have always wanted to read Parade's End by Ford M Ford and Zuleika Dobson by Max Beerbohn but when it came time to pick one from the shelf something else appeared more interesting. I am sure you have books like that on your shelf. This time is no different, so I vote for Mill on the Floss and for Kristen Lavrensdatter in second place. It would be nice if we could read the entire series in one session. There is something to be said for continuity as Traude pointed out. I hope we keep" Lighthouse" among the favorites. I think I would like to try Woolf on one of these ventures.

Deems
October 28, 2002 - 05:33 am
Good to see you. We are not at the voting stage yet. Please let us know if you would like to nominate one of the books you mention so that we can put it up in the header. Would you like To the Lighthouse up there? Or one of the others? Or more than one?

Justin
October 28, 2002 - 04:37 pm
Yes, Maryal, I thought "Lighthouse" had already been nominated and the same for "Mill on the Floss" and Lavrensdatter,the trio. If that is true, I will nominate Parade's End for the list. The book treats the issues of America in the post world war one era. It is a neglected period in American literature. The lessons of this period greatly influenced American attitudes and policies in post WWll and continue to influence our sense of international responsiblity. This feeling of being our brother's keeper with a strong military is the direct opposite of the attitudes one finds in post WWl.

Deems
October 28, 2002 - 07:14 pm
Thanks. Guess who forgot to read the list. Lighthouse is already there, but Parade's End isn't. Will get it up there. Ooooops, sorry for any confusion.

Deems
October 28, 2002 - 08:25 pm
who added Parade's End to our list of nominations.

Barbara St. Aubrey
November 4, 2002 - 05:40 pm
Well here I was so sure my time was going to be limited and I would not be able to join this round of Great Books - but it looks like my life is taking another turn - like Justin if Kristen Lavrensdatter is added I would surely vote for it - I know that several have already read her books some years ago and would probably rather tackle something they have not bitten into - would it be out of place to have a special group reading Kristen Lavrensdatter in addition to the Great Book selected? Reading Hanna's Daughters now has really put me in the mood for selections from the northern nations - I know, we just finished Beowulf that was from this part of the world but it seems to be like a secret trove of literature since there are so few well known authors that eminate from the Scandinavian countries.

Joan Pearson
November 22, 2002 - 10:21 am
Hello! We had a wonderful trip abroad...never had such a hard time getting back into the swing of things. Super jet lag and all sorts of issues to be dealt with waiting on the shore when we returned. Let's put off a final vote until after the holidays, okay?

Let's see, where are we? We need to get Kristin Lavransdater up on the list of nominations, I see. Barbara, I don't think you could squeeze in a discussion of this wonderful book before the holidays...as your schedule has become so full since you posted the suggestion.

There is a wonderful, highly acclaimed new translation of Don Quixote - Burton Raffel's is supposed to be quite entertaining...will look into it... I would like to consider it in the coming year as well.

Will put them both on the chart now...in the meantime, check out this upcoming Book Club On-Line discussion of Shakespeare's Julius Caesar. I think you'll enjoy it!

Barbara St. Aubrey
November 22, 2002 - 10:57 am
Great on the Shakespeare Joan - looks like we need a read that would be completed when Julius Ceaser starts in April - At this point I am hoping you do not start anything till the first weekend in January - which gives us three months in the dead of winter to tackle something. And yes dear Kristin would be a bit much in 3 months.

And oh dear no hard feelings please folks - we all have our favorites and our reasons - but I find Eliot tedious to read and cannot imagine just the task of reading it a joyfilled experience - Shaw's opinion of women is just awful - Wolf could be read and discussed in the three months but her work is usually depressive. I would find that hard in mid-winter - and isn't Parade's End about WW1? With us sliding into war I am not sure I also want to read about how war affects young men and boys. Is there no lively or joy filled Great Book?!? that could be read within 3 months? Something that would lift the spirit for a change...especially before we get ourselves into the angst over the betrayal of Ceasar...

Marvelle
November 22, 2002 - 11:59 am
Barbara, none of the suggested books appeal? I'd be open to ideas for fun reads.

What about one of Shakespeare's comedies? I've always liked "Twelfth Night" with its mistaken identities and gender-bending but he's written a lot of comedies that could be fun to read. How about Moliere's "Don Juan" which could be read in tandem with Molina's "Trickster of Seville"? Is Twain's "Huckleberry Finn" too serious?

Or...? What title would you suggest?

Marvelle

BaBi
November 22, 2002 - 12:54 pm
And here I was thinking we were going to begin Julius in January. Off-hand, I can't think of any "fun reads" in the Great Books category. Most of them do seem to deal with the greater, heavier issues of life.

Hmmm. Second thoughts... How about Dickens "Pickwick Papers"? Or Sir Walter Scott? ...Babi

Deems
November 22, 2002 - 02:39 pm
Don Quixote is a fun great book. I've never read all of it, and it is long, but I've read a good deal of it and the characters are wonderful. Cervantes and Shakespeare are exact contemporaries.

Let's get Don Quixote up on the list too, Joan. I'll nominate it. I know we've had it up there before.

Caesar won't be coming along until March. Ides of March being an appropriately Caesarian day. Don't know yet whether it will be one month or two.

M

Deems
November 22, 2002 - 02:40 pm
I see that Don Quixote is already there. Ooops. Sorry.

Joan Pearson
November 22, 2002 - 02:41 pm
Maryal, Don Quijote is up there on the list, but I agree, it is FUN. I'm not sure Babi, if you are nominating those titles, or giving them as examples of fun.

Let's put off the vote here until after the holidays, but continue to look at titles?

robert b. iadeluca
November 22, 2002 - 03:11 pm
Maryal says:--Caesar won't be coming along until March. Ides of March being an appropriately Caesarian day."

My estimation is that Life of Greece will finish about that time and, based on past experience, folks will clamor to begin Durant's third volume, "Plato, Caesar, and Christ."

Robby

Barbara St. Aubrey
November 22, 2002 - 04:31 pm
Ok some thoughts - Here is one in Bloom's western Canon that actually says it is a piece of wit and humor although I have never heard of the author Zuleika Dobson by Beerbohm - more modern fair how about Eudora Welty. She has several but an example would be Ponder Heart- now Italo Cavino writes not so much humor, as a delight almost like a grown up fairy tale - an example would be The Baron in the Trees Another I was not familiar with till I found it in Bloom's cannon is Penguin Island by Anotole France - than not as heavy as Shakespeare but a romp is Moliere's Misanthrope and finally Jane Austin usually provides us with a smile as we see these early nineteenth century characters make such a do about manners. Possibly Emma would do. Now Don Quijote is humor but 'Black Humor' with its greatest punch because history has shown how his actions seem foolish. Have you seen the play? It is dark and unpleasent.

Now I am not suggesting all these titles to go in the above - I've just found a few authors and titles that could be lighter fair than the usual heavy Great Book choice we seem to have been making - if any of you like any of these titles and want to consider one or two to be included among those in the above list of nominations that would be fine - or, you may have some other suggestions - I am just hoping we could have something a little lighter with a chance to smile if not laugh with the author for a change. I really do not want right now to read something we are laughing at the character or author - it would be nice to have a singing heart for a change.

betty gregory
November 23, 2002 - 07:51 am
Dickens, A Christmas Carol

(In trying to think of "fun," my thoughts have gone to short and simple, instead.)

I didn't look to see if Dickens is on any of the lists. Even if he is, this book wouldn't be listed, I'm sure. I've been meaning to read this again, though, after seeing so many versions of the movie. I think the last one I saw had Cicely Tison (sp?) as Ms. Scrooge. If we had to do it in January, we could combine it with thoughts on/of new year's resolutions.

Robert Frost is on the Harold Bloom list, I think. Has a book of poetry ever been done as a great book? Frost would approve of this unchartered path we're on, don't you think?

Jane Austen is not exactly "fun," but all her writing is delightful, and, yes, a few characters funny, her insight into society, relationships, family.....perfection. Emma or Persuasion or Sense and Sensibility, my favorites. Each time I read her, I see things I've never seen before. The last time I read an Austen book, I had an equally depressing and wonderful thought...that I know nothing about good writing. The first time I read something, maybe it was Pride and Prejudice, I was so pleased with myself for "understanding everything." That was the summer I read all her books and realized during the last one how little I understood the first.

Some of the recent movies of Jane Austen's work are really beautifully done. Emma Thompson, the actress, wrote the screenplay for Emma (is that the one?) and played the main character....the last scene of her crying, sobbing, for joy is priceless.

Betty

Marvelle
November 23, 2002 - 12:38 pm
Barbara, no you can't get away without nominating a book. I hope you will add one or two 'joyful' books to the nomination list. It's always nice to have different types of books to choose from so please, please nominate something.

Robert Frost poetry? He isn't a light or joyful read. Few good poets are except Whitman in "Leaves of Grass" who I have reservations about due to what I consider his over-the-top oratorial style. Frost is incredible, one of my favorites, but his poems are dark woods. If you're looking for a joyful book of poems you usually won't find it in the best poets.

Marvelle

Deems
November 23, 2002 - 01:56 pm
Hello everyone. In defense of Don Quixote, the main character's plan of becoming a knight and going out to fight evil (not unlike our modern superheroes) was outdated at the time. There hadn't been knights in armor around for several hundred years when Don Q decided to set out. I have not seen the play, but a play is an adaptation and couldn't include the whole novel.

I love Frost and the idea of a book of his poems is interesting, but Marvelle is right--the vision is pretty dark. Poets see deep and what they see is generally not sweetness and light. I speak of modern poets.

I have no problem with dark themes myself, but I understand that others do.

Maryal

Barbara St. Aubrey
November 23, 2002 - 02:52 pm
OK if we are not making a choice till early January than the first I could imagine a discussion starting would be mid-January - if Julias Ceasar starts on April 1 that leaves us 10 weeks to discuss a book - I looked up the number of pages some of the suggestioned books contain- a few of the books told me the physical size and thickness but did not mention pages e.g. Don Quijote, Misanthrope - this exercise also gave me a chance to review the write-up on all the selections - as well as some of those Babi, Betty and I have mentioned. I love the idea of Pickwick Papers but ohh the number of pages - although they would be a light read - I wish I wasn't doing Atonement because I would do Betty's suggestion of A Christmas Carol in a New York minute as a special Holiday discussion. Emma sounds like a romp - Betty the one you are thinking of, I think is Sense and Sensibility with Emma Thompsan. After rereading the Wolf seclection it really sounds wonderful - deep and a challange but wonderful - but knowing we are going into the time of Rome, a play by the wonderful Shakespeare in April again, I really would like a balance of something light and if possible would bring a smile to my heart if not my face and preferably not another play. Another, The Oresteia it sounds wonderful although, written by an author of the time, it is so close to the times of Julias Ceasar.

I didn't look up any of Robert Louis Stevenson's books but I have never read and have wanted to read both Arrowsmith and The Master of Ballatrae.

Now I didn't look up Ogdan Nash but there would be a poet that was humorous.

I've just ordered the illustrated version of Zuleika Dobson by Max Beerbohm and Penguin Island by Anatole France - I was intriqued by both these titles, having never heard of either - and I have one of Italo Calvino's books in my 'to read' stack - if I can get to any of these three books within the next couple of weeks before Christmas I will post my reaction and if they lend themselves well to a discussion.

Deems
November 23, 2002 - 03:16 pm
If anyone is worried about time constraints because of Caesar, I don't see a real problem. I'll be participating in both as co-DL but Caesar is a relatively short read. I don't mind at all if Great Books in running at the same time.

Caesar is set to "play" in March, not April.

Joan Pearson
November 23, 2002 - 10:59 pm
Barbara...which adaptation of Don Quixote did you see? AS Maryal has said, the adaptations are not the original. The latest updated Man of the Mancha is now previewing, on its way to Broadway. It is not dark at all...but a rather upbeat musical. There have been so many.

I don't consider the original as "dark" humor, though. It is a romantic tragi-comedy, tragic only insofar as man's "impossible dream" is tragic. I am quite excited about reading Raffel's Don...his new (1998) translation has been highly rated by people whose judgement I respect...the latest was Michael Dirda of the Washington Post.'

I love this discussion/examination of possibilities. I hear mention of many titles...remember, if you wish to enter a nomination for a future discussion, if you make that clear and we'll enter it into the heading.

The timing of this discussion has nothing to do with Julius Caesar...the only way timing would have been a consideration - would have been if we were to try to squeeze it in around the upcoming holidays. But we are not, so let's not be concerned about the number of pages in a nomination, okay? (But IF we were, GB Shaw's short St. Joan might be considered, hee, hee....)

If any of the titles any of you have mentioned were serious nominations, and you don't see them in the heading, please nominate again and we'll get it up there.

Justin
November 23, 2002 - 11:56 pm
I see by the list that we have not read any of Henry James. Many of his works have been reduced to film scripts lately so I think we should avoid those only because they and their plots have become very familiar. However, "The Golden Bowl", which is his last work, presumably brings all his many skills into play. The plot is unusual and adds relish to the reading. I can easily nominate the work but the list of nominees is already long. However this work might fit our need and if enough of you think it worthy, I will nominate it.

Joan Pearson
November 24, 2002 - 10:33 am
You're right, Justin...we have never even considered Henry James. Will put your nomination up in the chart now. All the nominated titles are linked to further descriptions and reviews. To read more about The Golden Bowl, just click the title.

Thanks, Justin!

Elizabeth N
November 26, 2002 - 12:19 pm
Betty, if it has not been mentioned, "Sense and Sensibility" was the film in which Emma Thompson wept for joy--that was priceless. Did you say Thompson did the screen play? I admire the way the part of the youngest sister was enhanced and broadened. Much humanity, reality and humor was added as we see the three older women revolving around the care of this bright little girl. Margaret--she barely crept onto the page in the original. (or am I wrong; it's been a while since I read it)
Elizabeth

Joan Pearson
November 27, 2002 - 04:58 pm


Hey Everybuddy! In case you didn't notice the heading invitation to the Julius Caesar discussion scheduled to begin March I...you might want to click the link and go secure a seat!

Joan Pearson
March 14, 2003 - 12:34 pm
A good many of you have been taking part in the Julius Caesar discussion this month. I know that has been a great experience for you.

References to Dante's Inferno have been turning up everywhere these days, have you noticed that too? Have you ever read it? What do you remember about it? The poet moves through the nine circles of Hell - on his journey to Heaven. Does that make sense to you? The threat or suspense is that he will have to dwell there permanently if he does not overcome material or physical desires and weaknesses. Do we all have such an opportunity? Is our hell right here on earth? Can that be the reason that references to the Inferno are seen so often these days?

In 1867 Henry Wadsworth Longfellow completed the first American translation of Dante Alighieri's Inferno. It had gone out of print until February, 2003 - just off the presses. The young editor of this new Modern Library edition, Matthew Pearl received the Dante Club of America's prize for his scholarly research on Dante in 1998.

In 1867, Henry W. Longfellow translated the Divine Comedy with the help of Oliver Wendall Holmes and James Russell Lowell. They would meet on Wednesday nights and translate one or two canticles and then have a nice meal afterwards. They called their congenial little group, "the Dante Club."
Now here's the fun part-
The same Michael Pearl who edited the 1867 Longfellow translation of the Inferno has come up with an exceptional murder mystery - The Dante Club. You'll see this book making its way on best seller lists all over the country - it was #10 on the New York Times list this past week. It is a funny blend of fact and fiction- set in 1865. There are a string of murders up at Harvard - the murderer soon identified as someone who is familiar with Dante. The detectives turn out to be Longfellow, Holmes and Lowell!!! Also a young black police detective (unheard of in these post Civil War days.) So much interesting background - much of it based on fact, some on fancy and imagination.

After reading the first 100 pages, I thought to myself, I just HAVE to read the Longfellow translation of the Inferno now. And then I remembered how Dante has been nominated so many times for a Great Books Discussion and thought of you. Julius Caesar will be winding down in a two weeks - would you be interested in reading the Inferno together right here? It wouldn't have to be the Matthew Pearl/Longfellow translation, although that's the one I'm reading now. In fact, we have had so much success using different translations to get a grasp of the original intent, I'm sure that would work well with Dante too.

Please, please post if you would be interested in descending the depths of hell with Dante, Virgil, Maryal and myself. We'd love to have you join us next month. The more the merrier.

Maybe we can get up some interest in discussing the Matthew Pearl murder mystery in the Book Club Online...at the same time. I'd love to share this dual experience with you.


ps. Andy, love the "shared inquiry" idea...will be looking for that "basic interpretive question- a genuine question about the meaning of the selection that continues to be puzzling even after careful reading" ...for our next discussion here.

We'll keep all of the other suggested titles up in the chart in the heading for future selections -

Nellie Vrolyk
March 15, 2003 - 09:17 am
Joan, I would be interested in taking part in a discussion of Dante's Inferno.

Deems
March 15, 2003 - 09:54 am
We are going to have such fun. What an excellent idea this is--a trip to hell with Dante the pilgrim, his guide, Virgil, and of course Joan and me.

Welcome, Nellie. Good to have you onboard!

Marvelle
March 15, 2003 - 03:08 pm
JOAN and MARYAL, count me in on the discussion. Few people can say that they took a most exclusive vacation on a Guided Tour of Hell. There are many online texts of the Longfellow translation although I've ordered that book as well as The Dante Club for fun. Books are easier reading for me and it's impossible to underline or scribble notes over a television or computer screen! Well, perhaps it's possible but not so simple to erase.

Will we also get a chance to vote on a Great Book?

Marvelle

Joan Pearson
March 15, 2003 - 03:29 pm
hahaha, Marvelle, I'm laughing at the Drabble quote in your preference line...wonderful! When you ordered the Longfellow, did you notice that the book jackets on both the mystery and the translation are identical?

Maryal - was the name of the translator you were trying to remember -Robert Pinsky? Barbara wrote and said she would prefer that one. That's fine, the more the better I think.

Marvelle, yes, when we move out of here to the book discussion site we'll leave this chart in the heading and get up a vote. Yes we will.

Nellie too...Poets' Corner here.

Deems
March 15, 2003 - 03:54 pm
Joan--Could well be Pinsky. He's a wonderful poet. Barb--Is it out in paperback?

Good to know I can check the Longfellow on line.

M

Marvelle
March 15, 2003 - 06:40 pm
I have the Pinsky edition also which I like. He's written that he found the Longfellow translation to be the most useful to him, being both poetic and accurate, so I'm looking forward to a comparison of the two. There's also the Mandlebaum translation (and others).

JOAN, Yes the jackets are the same now that you mention it. (I hadn't noticed!) It'd be fun to discuss both books if there's enough interest.

Marvelle

Traude S
March 15, 2003 - 07:16 pm
JOAN,

I too would like to participte and use the translation by Robert Pinsky, our past Poet Laureate. He called it The Inferno of Dante (1994). The original Italian text is on the left, his wonderful translation on the right.

Justin
March 15, 2003 - 11:43 pm
I will enjoy reading the Inferno with you, Joan and Maryal. I read the poem, perhaps, thirty years ago. I remember reading daily, three or four pages at a time, while soaking in a hot tub. When the tub bubbled up the pages became wet. At some point the book broke in half. Then I began to discard pages as I read them. When I finished reading, the book was gone. I do not remember the name of the translator. I would have noticed had it been Longfellow.

I am also planning to read Bovary with Eloise and keep up with Durant's Civilization at the same time. I hope I can make it all work out while continuing to earn a livlihood as well as prepare tax reports. April is such a busy month.

ALF
March 16, 2003 - 06:55 am
It's Joan and Maryal once again leading us into new depths along the road to hell. Oh, yes, count me in. (IF I should return from Ireland) In May, Lorrie and I are doing Moby Dick and Maryal and I are slated for June to discuss The Little Friend. When will this be scheduled?

It's quite exciting-- I've never read Dante's Inferno so- of course, I'll have to surround myself with all kinds of materials and references . I love it!

Hats
March 16, 2003 - 07:10 am
Hi Joan and Maryal,

I would like to join the discussion. I am typing with trembling fingers because I feel that Dante's Inferno will be too difficult for me to understand. But with all of you wonderful people surrounding me, surely I won't fall into the fiery depths. If I do, I have all my good friends to pull me out.

Do I need a particular translation?

Francisca Middleton
March 16, 2003 - 10:33 am
I'm going to get the copy that has both languages...can't remember the translator, but will let you know.

First I have to celebrate St. Patrick's Day (cooking corned beef today), then I'll get the book!

Whoopee!!!!!!!!

Barbara St. Aubrey
March 16, 2003 - 12:30 pm
I would love to do Dante but, with a book on the great book list next month of Madame Bovery and than Moby Dick, another considered by many a great book, both with enough literary merit to prove a challange I am hoping Dante could be scheduled a bit later - This is a wonderful opportunity that I really do not want to miss but I do not want to miss the other's in its place. These are not authors that can be gobbled down in a few short sittings - please must we choose from among the three...

Joan Pearson
March 16, 2003 - 01:25 pm
We're good to go with this one in mid April...but no, we will not gobble in up in a few sittings. We'll take our time, doing three canticles a week...there are 33 of them (Dante has a thing about the numbers 3 and 9)...so that will take us into July. Justin, I love the image of you reading the canticles (aloud?) in your tub. Promise to do it again? I'm going to try that ...but I scribble so much in the margins, I'll ruin my book!

Fran, good to have you...Andy and Barbara, I hope you can sandwich in a few canticles during other discussions. That's the thing about these Great Books discussions - a slow, leisurely pace that leaves time in the day for other things...I hope you TRY...would love to have you join us.

Andy, be thinking about a good shared inquiry question, please?

Traude, I'm going to get the Pinsky translation for sure if it has the Italian on the one side, the English on the other...Fran, check it out. Fran's studying Italian - me too, but Fran is much more dedicated to it.

Deems
March 16, 2003 - 02:01 pm
I can read it pretty well with the English on the other side!

Marvelle
March 16, 2003 - 04:21 pm
Hi, Hats! Check out the heading for suggested great books. There's one for the Inferno, translated by Longfellow that's available at B&N but JOAN and MARYAL have said that any translation is fine.

JOAN in post 344 mentioned the new mystery novel The Dante Club by Matthew Pearl which is on the bestseller list. Pearl is also the editor of the Longfellow edition of the Inferno and in 1998 he received the prestigious Dante Prize from the Dante Society of America for his scholarly work.

I want to read the Longfellow translation in case we also discuss Matthew Pearl's The Dante Club which has Longfellow himself as one of the leading characters. If we don't discuss the mystery I still have the pleasure of reading it following Dante's Inferno.

______________________________________________

From the dustjacket of The Dante Club (also available at B&N at bargain price)

"In 1865 Boston, the literary geniuses of the Dante Club -- poets and Harvard professors Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, Dr. Oliver Wendell Holmes, and James Russell Lowell, along with publisher J. T. Fields -- are finishing America's first translation of The Divine Comedy and preparing to unveil Dante's remarkable visions to the New World. [They are fighting against puritanical attempts at censorship by the Boston Brahmins at Harvard College.]

The members of the Dante Club fight to keep a sacred literary cause alive but their plans fall apart when a series of murders erupt through Boston and Cambridge. Only this small group of scholars realizes that the gruesome killings are are modeled on the descriptions of Hell's punishments in Dante's Inferno. With the lives of the Boston elite and Dante's literary future in America at stake, the Dante Club members must find the killer before the authorities discover their secret." With 1865 as the background, the Civil War is ever present and the police detective, Nicholas Rey, is the first black member of the Boston police department. Rey and Dr. Holmes work closely together to solve the murders.

I'm assuming that if we also discuss The Dante Club it'd be a short discussion. I'm resisting reading it now because I don't want to know whodunit in advance of any possible discussion. Also, I think I'll understand more of the mystery having read Dante's Inferno first and then being able to apply my newfound knowledge to The Dante Club.

BARB, I know what you mean about 'too many books, too little time.' I plan to join the Moby-Dick discussion and have another online discussion in April but.... I can't resist the opportunity being offered here. I hope you can't resist either? This is exciting and too good to pass!

Marvelle

Hats
March 17, 2003 - 03:08 am
Hi Marvelle,

Thank you for pointing the header out. I will have to miss the discussion. I have signed up for Madame Bovary and Kitchen Privileges. Both of these discussions are in April. I can do two discussions, with difficulty, but three would be impossible.

I will try really hard to read all of the posts on Dante. Thanks for all of the help. Anyway, I would probably have gotten lost in the discussion. When the discussion is archived, I will be able to take my time and read and reread what is being said. Dante would certainly take a HUGE bite out of my pea brain.

Lady C
March 17, 2003 - 01:44 pm
For years my friends hve been saying I'm headed for hell but not a word about returning. So here's my chance to go to hell and back--with Dante.

Through the years, I've encountered numerous references to the circles of hell in my reading, but have been either too lazy or too immersed in a book to stop and check it out. The result was ignorance when next I encountered the same reference elsewhere.

So please let's follow this descent, knowing we will come back as Dante intended, somehat wiser.

Joan Pearson
March 17, 2003 - 03:59 pm
Lady C, perfect! Come to hell with us and let's hope we all make it back safe and if not sound!

Hats, lurk, lurk and you'll get hooked, I know you will! This is right up your alley!

Francisca Middleton
March 20, 2003 - 11:11 am
The book I purchased yesterday at Borders is a hard cover, new translation by Anthony Esolen, with Italian on facing pages with the English (2002, Modern Library). I know better than to expect a literal translation, but I'm interested in seeing the variations...and also the sound differences...that is, the music one "hears" by reading aloud.

Okay, I know, slightly weird. But I learned when reading Churchill's WWII memoirs that reading wonderful English aloud is very rewarding. Well, to me it is.

Of course I can't do that on a plane!!!!!!!

FranMMM

Joan Pearson
March 20, 2003 - 07:12 pm
Fran, good for you! I was just reading that the only way to read Dante is in Italian! That leaves the rest of us wown in the second tier. Keep us informed of your experience though...

There's a that is another bilingual volume...the Robert Pinsky translation , available at Barnes & Noble.

Justin, are you going to read aloud in the tub? I read Canto I three times aloud...and finally got it. Longfellow's. Not in the tub though - but I DID memorize the opening line and recited it in the shower. Husband asked me if I was alright in there...

The discussion is almost ready for us to move in. Watch for it tomorrow...

antoinette
March 20, 2003 - 08:13 pm
please sign me up for dante's inferno to be read/discussed in april. thank you---antoinette

Jonathan
March 20, 2003 - 10:26 pm
This looks interesting. May I join you? After some looking I found my ancient Dante, or I should say an 1814 translation by the Rev. H. F. Cary, A.M. In glorious blank verse, reflecting the perceptions and sensibiltities of the Romantic period. I believe they were more inclined to feel pity for those without hope. And then I got lucky. Or was it someone in Heaven directing my footsteps. Passing by a small book seller's shop I turned in, and found a new copy of the Robert Pinsky book at 2/3 off! I have to admit I have not read what Rev. Cary calls The Vision of Dante Alighieri, and, in his words: 'one of the sublimest efforts of the human invention.'

Hats
March 21, 2003 - 02:57 am
I have ordered my book. My lurking spirit will be here listening to Joan, Maryal and Jonathan and the others.

Justin
March 21, 2003 - 11:51 pm
Pinsky (bilingual)is $10. at Borders. Longfellow (monolingual) is $9. Both editions are available as well as several other translations.

Joan Pearson
March 22, 2003 - 05:12 am
Justin...if you are leaning towards the Longfellow edition, I'd recomment the new Modern Library edition edited by Matthew Pearl.

This is great...by tomorrow the new Inferno discussion will open and all of you who have indicated interest in discussing this book will be notified to pack up and move over there.

Isn't this going to be a great adventure?

Hats
March 22, 2003 - 05:46 am
I think Saddam Hussein is President Bush's Moby Dick!

Hats
March 22, 2003 - 01:41 pm
Sorry, Joan and Maryal. I posted this message with the wrong discussion. I must have been half asleep.

Deems
March 22, 2003 - 01:53 pm
Glad to hear that! I thought you had gone off the deep end.

heh heh

Hats
March 22, 2003 - 05:15 pm
Maryal,

It sure sounded like it!!!

Justin
March 23, 2003 - 12:03 am
Hats; I thought you were lost at sea.

Hats
March 23, 2003 - 01:28 am
Justin,

I did feel as though I were drowning!!! Hahaha.

Joan Pearson
March 23, 2003 - 11:32 am
Out of the depths of the sea to the depths of the Hell! Please meet us in Dante's Inferno when you see this. Dress appropriately, it's hot in there!

Hats
March 23, 2003 - 01:01 pm
Hi Joan and Maryal,

I am so glad that you, in some way, intertwined the sea and hell in your above post. What a relief!!

GingerWright
March 30, 2003 - 12:06 am
It is Good to see you here again as I have missed seeing Your posts but got a return on your email add so you might want to check it out.

Joan Pearson
March 31, 2003 - 06:46 am
Brumie, delighted to hear you are brave enough to accompany us in the descent. Will move your post over to the newly opened discussion.
If anyone else is looking for us, Maryal and I, and a brave corps of adventurous souls are waiting for you HERE.

Joan Pearson
July 20, 2003 - 04:53 pm
It's nomination time again. Someone suggested we leave the last nominations up in the chart. Feel free to make more suggestions. I took Inferno off the list...so all the others are still up for discussion.

This is always such fun!

Marvelle
July 20, 2003 - 06:01 pm
Yippeee! Here we go with another Great Books nomination and vote. I see my third-time nomination of "Oresteia" is still up there and lots of other Great ones too.

Hope to see other titles nominated and I'll try to think of another one too. Perhaps Barbara has found something from the incredible list she compiled and was considering last nomination?

Marvelle

Justin
July 20, 2003 - 09:54 pm
I bought a copy of "Purgatorio" translated by W.S. Merwin. I bought it today, on Pinsky's recomendation. I will have the book on hand just in case any of you folks want to go to the painful land of hope with me in the Fall. I also noticed, on the shelf, a translation by Sinclair that is in prose.

Joan Pearson
July 21, 2003 - 01:59 am
Justin, I know that some of the hellions from the Inferno are ready to go on with Dante's Purgatorio...will enter the nomination to the list.

We will spend some time on this selection as another Great Books selection will not take place until Fall after the National Book Festival.

Let's spend some time exploring the possibilities...

Faithr
July 21, 2003 - 10:56 am
Well Justin I am going to read Purgatory but it would be a nicer journey with my friends from hell. But I like several other selections annd will wait and see what is in others minds as summer goes on. I am so hot in the Sacramento Valley I feel ready to return to the mountains but it is too darned expensive at Tahoe where I grew up . I use to just drive up to Placerville and lay around my sisters pool.Now it is as hot up there as here for some reason so I just stay home after ten in the morning. faith

hegeso
July 21, 2003 - 05:21 pm
I was a latecomer for Inferno, but I am taking the courage to vote. I am for Hamlet, because there are so many possible ways of understanding-misunderstanding it. Great material for discussion.

Greetings from Hegeso, the Shakespeare-freak.

Joan Pearson
July 22, 2003 - 04:45 am
Hegeso! Good! You found your way here. Others should be arriving in about a week - once our monthy Newsletter, Book Bytes, goes out telling the Bookies that we are considering a follow-up for the Inferno (how do you follow the Inferno?)

Hamlet ihas been entered into the table above...I agree, there are many facets of Hamlet -

Deems
July 22, 2003 - 12:17 pm
Ooooooh I like the idea of HAMLET. We had a good time a while ago reading Julius Caesar.

I have a question: Is Little Women on any of the lists? If it is, it might be fun to revisit it as mature readers.

Maryal

Deems
July 22, 2003 - 12:19 pm
Another nomination: Twain, Puddnhead Wilson.

Just checked Bloom's list and Little Women is on it.

Joan Pearson
July 23, 2003 - 01:43 pm
Maryal, it's funny you should mention Mark Twain. As you know, I nominate Shaw's play, St. Joan every go-round. It's not a long work and I am always on the lookout for a nice companion piece for it. Just YESTERDAY, I was in the library and came across Mark Twain's <i<Personal Recollections of Joan of Arc. Had you ever heard of it? Is this not an unlikely subject of Mark Twain? I'll let you know what I think of it after reading it. I can't wait to get started!

Maryal, I'll enter Pudd'n Head Wilson and Little Women right now. By the way, the book titles in the chart in the heading are all clickable links if you want to learn more about a particular title.

Deems
July 23, 2003 - 04:36 pm
Joan--Interesting "coincidence." Must be that same wavelength thing operating again! Please let me know what you think of Twain's Joan. I have read half of it (it's on the internet somewhere)--back when I was teaching the play (Shaw). I won't give you my opinion until you have read it.

Am I a good sport, or what? Heh.

P.S. Thanks for adding the ' in Puddn'head. Geeesh! I've got to get back to work; brain is turning to mush.

BaBi
July 24, 2003 - 12:32 pm
I've always enjoyed Shaw, and haven't read "Saint Joan". I'd be interested in doing that.

I tried the link on Oresteia to learn more about it, but all I found was B&N offering to sell it to me. Obviously it's a Greek play,about Orestes, I presume, but that is the full extent of my knowledge of it. Anybody want to tell me more? ...Babi

Joan Pearson
July 24, 2003 - 12:39 pm
hhmm, B&N is usually good at telling about the books they sell, BaBi! I'm sure Marvelle will be along soon to tell you about it. She's been nominating Oresteia ALMOST as long as I've been trying for St. Joan...

Marvelle
July 24, 2003 - 04:02 pm
JOAN, we should start up a "Lonely Hearts Club" for the rejected (classics, of course).

The Oresteia is an ancient Greek tragedy (but not a 'downer,' not depressing) -- composed of three plays called Agamemnon, The Libation Bearers, and The Eumenides. The three plays total about the reading length of a medium to short modern novel. It has a happy ending as Greek tragedies can have despite its beginnings. It's about murder and the seemingly unending cycle of revenge, examining if/when an individual has suffered enough, and the concept of justice.

Maybe our politicians ought to read the Oresteia.

The trilogy starts with the triumphant return of King Agamemnon from the Trojan Wars. Then he's killed in revenge for certain of his actions along with his Trojan captive Cassandra, and others are killed for their acts . .. and one person is haunted by The Furies (his guilt). Apollo and Athena actually hold a trial in the third play with citizens of Greece as the jury to decide if the cycle of revenge can, or should, end.

From theatrehistory.com: "Says William von Humboldt of the Agamemnon, and his remarks might be applied to the entire trilogy: 'Among all the products of the Greek stage none can compare with it in tragic power; no other play shows the same intensity and pureness of belief in the divine and good; none can surpass the lessons it teaches, and the wisdom of which it is the mouthpiece.' "

I like the modern translations except for Ted Hughes. Obviously I love this trilogy with themes still relevant in today's world.

Marvelle

ALF
July 24, 2003 - 07:13 pm
I do love Mark Twain though.

Marvelle
July 24, 2003 - 08:04 pm
Perhaps Wolf's "Cassandra" could accompany another selection? Bloom has it on his list; "Cassandra" a contemporary novel (1984) by Christa Wolf. This is history from a woman's perspective.

Cassandra, daughter of Priam, King of Troy, has the gift of prophecy but is fated by a spurned Apollo never to be believed. As a captive of Agamemnon, Cassandra confronts her past which brings her to an understanding of her fate and soon-to-come-death and with that understanding comes a determination to tell her story.

The novel is 134 pages and there are 4 essays included in the book that talk of the genesis of the novel. From the inner book sleeve: the essays "take the form of travel reports from Greece, journal entries, and a letter to a friend. They explore issues as diverse as the threat of nuclear war, the role of women in ancient civilizations and in modern societies, the role of women in literature... (and) religion. Yet, no matter what she is discussing, Wolf eventually circles back to Cassandra."

I enjoy Cassandra and the essays are a treat, but still, I prefer Wolf's more recent (1998) "Medea: A Modern Retelling" which is introduced by Margaret Atwood but it isn't (yet) on Bloom's list. Medea has always had my interest because the traditional male slant on the story is so different from how a woman might perceive Medea.

Marvelle

Deems
July 24, 2003 - 08:48 pm
Another nominee: One Hundred Years of Solitude by Gabriel Garcia Marquez. It's on Bloom's list. About fifty people have told me that I MUST read it.

Marvelle
July 24, 2003 - 09:32 pm
MARYAL, JOAN and all interested posters: when is a good time to read and discuss a long work?

I'm curious and it may help us when proposing a discussion and setting dates. I believe that few, if any, of us would want to read big works back to back; too exhausting. When is the timing right for works like Kristin Lavansdatter, Don Quijote, Moby Dick? What months are impractical?

Marvelle

Justin
July 24, 2003 - 11:13 pm
I am not ready to launch into Purgatorio. A little vacation would be nice.

Faith: I am sorry it is so warm in the Sacramento area. The weather close to the beach in the Santa Cruz-Monterey area is 65-75 during the day and 55-60 at night. One day this summer the temp reached 80. Boy! That was a scorcher. Wish you were here.

Faithr
July 25, 2003 - 11:41 am
JUSTIN My grandmother lived in Santa Cruz off and on from 1940 till her death in 1972. She had a little bar and cafe in Boulder Creek and about a mile up in the trees she had a beautiful cabin and so did my dad on the same 5 acre parcel. I visited there every summer for many years. I loved that area and got the worst sunburn of my life in the fog on the beach at the end of the pier. Victoria was actively running the cafe and bar called Bolder Creek Inn until about 1954 then moved into Santa Cruz for good. She came often to the redwoods to visit my dad after that so in summers we began visiting up there with the kids so that they would get to know my Dad and his only one living relative other than his six kids. Faith

Joan Pearson
July 25, 2003 - 11:53 am
...Just rushing through...and want to say that 100 years of Solitude has been nominated in the Community Center for the Book Club Online...let's see if that goes anywhere before putting it on the chart here. Yes, Marvelle, I've heard that it is a must-read too!

Marvelle
July 25, 2003 - 12:52 pm
Oops! JOAN, it was MARYAL who nominated "100 Years of Solitude." I naminated the novel "Cassandra" by Christa Wolf.

Also, I wondered when are the best times for a long or complex work. There are periods -- for instance, around Christmas -- when people are pressed for time.

Marvelle

Deems
July 25, 2003 - 03:08 pm
marvelle--no official policy that I know of. Personal experience is that Fall and Spring are the most active times. (I'm defining Spring as mid-January-May; odd, but I like to be optimistic!)

Joan Pearson
July 25, 2003 - 04:19 pm
Christa Wolf's Cassandra has been added to the list. Maryal that's right...we have no official policy. Summer is bad because folks are in and out. Christmas doesn't seem to have that much of an effect on our discussions, except for one week, which in a long discussion is nothing.

hegeso
July 25, 2003 - 06:19 pm
Joan, I followed "Inferno" since the day I entered this wonderful place, but I should start it all over again as soon as I finish my orientation in all the forums I am interested in.

Now, I have a question. I don't want to be pushy, but I adore poetry, and can read poems in the original in German, French, Italian, Spanish, and also in Hungarian, which is out of question here. I don't mention English, because nobody needs my help in that language.

I posted the question in the "Books in other languages" forum, but didn't get the permission so far. Please, tell me whether my contributions could be accepted.

Joan Pearson
July 25, 2003 - 06:29 pm
Hegeso, our newest GB friend! - I am not sure that the Books in Other Languages folks can handle all of those languages, but yes, go ahead and post in French there. I know for a fact the poetry would be appreciated there. We also have a Poetry discussion (click here), but am not sure about the language proficiency of that group. You could ask them...

Maryal, I've been convinced in another discussion that the length of 100 Years of Solitude would be prohibitive anywhere but in the GReat Books...so I'll enter it now into our list of nominations.

OK, it's up there...click the link to learn more. Here's what I just read about it
Probably García Márquez finest and most famous work. One Hundred Years of Solitude tells the story of the rise and fall, birth and death of a mythical town of Macondo through the history of the Buendía family. Inventive, amusing, magnetic, sad, alive with unforgettable men and women, and with a truth and understanding that strike the soul. One Hundred Years of Solitude is a masterpiece of the art of fiction.

Éloïse De Pelteau
August 1, 2003 - 08:20 pm
Hegeso, What a wonderful idea to post some Poetry in French. We are dying to have something new and exciting to talk about. You certainly will be most welcome. All you have to do is click:

FRENCH DISCUSSION HERE

We are anxiously expecting you there.

Soyez le bienvenue.

Eloïse

MegR
August 6, 2003 - 04:44 pm
Maryal & Joan, I would luuuuuuuuuv to revisit Marquez or good old Puddinhead. Hamlet's up there in my top 5 too! - MegR

Deems
August 6, 2003 - 04:50 pm
Hi there, Meg. Good to see you. I like a number of the nominations as well. Twain would be fun, especially in his more serious mode--sort of. Hamlet is wonderful to read and contemplate. Marquez is a much praised author. So many books. . . .and then there's trying to keep up with some of the ones coming out!

Joan Pearson
August 6, 2003 - 04:52 pm
Quite a reaction to Marquez in the halls these days. We're gearing up for the big vote, but nominations will remain open for a while longer. A good number of us still recovering from Dante's Inferno.

NOMINATIONS STILL OPEN!

Marvelle
August 6, 2003 - 06:10 pm
I read Marquez' "...Solitude" in a Spanish class. The novel received a lot of attention because it was translated into English at an auspicious time and because it's good. There are lots of great reviews but you might want to read an actual chapter or skim through the book for firsthand information before voting. I preferred his short novel "The Incredible and Sad Tale of Innocent Erendira."

JOAN, I'm recovering (I think) from Dante's Inferno ... a wonderful, scary, thought provoking trip. Haven't quite thawed out. (smile)

Marvelle

Jo Meander
August 6, 2003 - 11:54 pm
I aagree with MegR about Marquez, Puddnhead, and Hamlet. Any one of those would grab me.

Kathleen Zobel
August 11, 2003 - 10:14 am
I sure hope Man of La Mancha is chosen. It certainly meets the requirements of time and quality. From what I understand Cervantes philosophy is barely recognizable in the play or movie scripts.

I'm so turned on with reading it I ordered a copy of the Raffli translation from B&N.

It would be great reading it for a public discussion

Kathleen Zobel

Joan Pearson
August 11, 2003 - 10:18 am
kathleen, it is one of my favorite on that list too! In fact, I've had the Raffi translation of Don Quixote here at my elbow since Christmas...just waiting for a discussion here!

So good to hear from you!

Faithr
August 11, 2003 - 10:19 am
Well I have made up my mind now and am ready to vote when ever your open the voting. Faith

Joan Pearson
August 11, 2003 - 10:21 am
~I know you are quite the open-minded lady, Faith! We have no idea what else will be added to this list by the end of the week!
All recovered from the foray into the Inferno?

Faithr
August 11, 2003 - 10:42 am
Oh yeah Joan, I am recovered and then some. My blood pressure is responding( dropping) to my exercise ( Curves health club) program. I go every morning at 6:45 and when I get back home I am full of energy. I am sorry I wasted years sitting around getting so out of shape but really glad my MD caught me up short and that my family are helping me with the program too. In 1 month I lost 4 inch's total so we will see if I can do that again. You cant even see that but my clothes are looser.

I will definitely keep an open mind as some one may just come up with a nomination I like better or as well as I do my choice now. Faith

Deems
August 11, 2003 - 01:19 pm
Faith--Congratulations to you! I strongly support you in your exercise program and am so happy that you are seeing results. Even if you didn't have those inches to be proud of, the fact that exercise actually gives you more energy is enough.

I swim, as most of you know, and a few days ago found myself in conversation in the lockerroom with an older (than me) woman who remarked somewhere in what she said that she was 79. I was amazed and told her so. She said, "You really have to work at it."

We now return you to our next Great Book preselection discussion.

Maryal

Barbara St. Aubrey
August 11, 2003 - 07:02 pm
thanks for the e-mail Joan - I've been scattered this summer - from the great list my druthers would be any of these three - Kristin Lavansdatter - Oresteia - One Hundred Years of Solitude

Hats
August 11, 2003 - 11:31 pm
I like Puddn'head Wilson and Hamlet

Joan Pearson
August 12, 2003 - 04:13 am
Oh, Faith, I KNOW exercise, regularly scheduled is the answer to so many of our problems. Overheard a young lady say to her friend as they came out of a gym..."you feel like a whole other person after a workout, don't you?" ~ I am so undisciplined these days...you are an inspiration. Loose clothes!

Hats, Barbara - so good to hear from you! We'll narrow that list down next week...want to make sure everyone has been heard from before we start to do that...

JudytheKay
August 12, 2003 - 07:31 am
I'll vote for Marquez - the best of the best!

Judy

Joan Pearson
August 12, 2003 - 07:42 am
Judy - so good to hear from you. Be sure to come back next week when the voting starts...who knows, there just may be something else that catches your eye by then.

Phyll
August 12, 2003 - 07:51 am
I would really like to read (again) and discuss "Don Quijote".

BaBi
August 12, 2003 - 12:15 pm
I like Shaw, and haven't read Saint Joan, so I would like to do that. I'm also interested in Marquez. I haven't read anything of his yet, but I am 'hearing' the name more and more. ...Babi

Joan Pearson
August 13, 2003 - 08:21 am
So many books, so little time. It appears that you have made up your minds - I promise to get in touch with all of you who have posted here next week when we actually start recording your preferences. Will stay open for more nominations for a few more days. I want to read the whole list!

ps. BaBi...your comment on Shaw's St. Joan did not go unnoticed! An exercise in contrasts would be Mark Twain's Prospective on Joan of Arc, and Shaw's play!!!

BaBi
August 13, 2003 - 09:31 am
I didn't even know Twain had written a "Prospective on Joan of Arc"! I've got a volume of his works around here somewhere...I think. I've got to go look this up. Thanks for mentioning it...Babi

Marvelle
August 13, 2003 - 10:07 am
Are we voting now or next week? I have tentatively made my decision(s) but ... always subject to change. This process has given me time to look at some of the nominations I wasn't familiar with and to revisit those I do know. I'm glad that Marquez is garnering interest although I suggest an actual look at the novel before voting for it, even if briefly, since the genre is challenging in ways that even James Joyce didn't think of. And Hamlet and Oresteia which both revolve around issues of revenge, first novel Don Quijote, the ascent to Purgatorio ... I enjoy considering all the nominations. I have a sudden thought on Joan of Arc that I want to check out .... back soon.

Marvelle

Marvelle
August 13, 2003 - 11:11 am
I hope Professor Maryal will advise us on Joan of Arc. I have the Mark Twain Joan of Arc which I've never read until now. It's a historical romance. Here is one website that looks at this novel:

Twain's Joan of Arc

Maryal, if Shaw's Joan of Arc is selected, would you suggest reading Twain along with Shaw or perhaps a biography such as the one by Regine Pemoud? Or would you recommend reading Shaw alone?

Marvelle

Deems
August 13, 2003 - 01:33 pm
Marvelle has asked me a direct question which I really don't know how to duck. I taught Shaw's Saint Joan last year because the Masqueraders were doing it as their fall production. The play is extremely talky and I am below lukewarm on it. I suppose there are interesting issues in it, but the tone of the play is odd. There was a movie made (50s) based on Shaw's play with Jean Seeburg (Seaberg?) as Joan and several prominent English actors as the Dauphin and courtiers. The movie is typical of its era with fake scenery and such, but it captures fairly well the tone I am trying to describe.

As for Twain's portrait of Joan, I read half of it on the internet. I had no desire to go further. It is far from vintage Twain.

To lighten things up a bit, our discussions are always good in Great Books, it seems, so no matter what the material we have to work with, good things will happen.

Ducking and running. . . . . Maryal

horselover
August 16, 2003 - 06:35 am
I think it would be fun to read "Little Women" again, as an adult. I read it several times when I was young, and it was one of my favorite books. Jo was a role model in an era when women were expected to marry, have children, and become full-time homemakers.

BaBi
August 16, 2003 - 08:45 am
Do I remember correctly, Horselover, that Jo had to market her stories under a man's name? So many early women authors did that. ...Babi

Faithr
August 16, 2003 - 10:11 am
Ok Joan..got your e mail this morning and sat and though a while then decided to vote first for Don Quijote' Cevantes(Raffle) and for To the Litehouse by Virginia Wolfe.

I enjoy so much the opera's and plays and takeoffs on this story Don Quijote that I have a real urge to discuss it in this group. I have not read anything written by Virginia Wolfe. I always intend to and then skip it for some reason so now seems a good time to start along with others. Faith

georgehd
August 16, 2003 - 10:42 am
I would like to read Marquez with a group. I do not have another preference.

Joan Pearson
August 16, 2003 - 12:05 pm
Thanks, George, Faith. Your votes are up there in the chart.

To all others, even if you expressed a preference for one or another last week during nominations, you'll need to repost your top 2 choices starting today to get them onto the chart, okay? Unless there is a clear cut winner the first time around (this rarely happens), we'll have a second vote when the list is pared down next week.

Look forward to hearing from you. This is such fun! I'd be happy with any of the three votes already submitted!

Marvelle
August 16, 2003 - 01:23 pm
What happens once the votes are in and the second of my preferences misses being number 1 by a vote. Will my #2 vote count in its favor? Can I change my vote? (Assuming my #1 preference isn't close to being chosen.)

I'm debating between 3 choices and one of them has already received a vote. Oh, the agony of decisions!

Marvelle

Hats
August 16, 2003 - 02:19 pm
I would like to vote for Puddn'head Wilson as a first choice and Hamlet as a second choice.

Joan Pearson
August 16, 2003 - 03:54 pm
Hats, your votes have been recorded. Thanks! An interesting combination!

Marvelle, I've had two grandbabies here all day (under age two), so right now your question is too complicated to answer. Maybe tomorrow I'll understand the question. You can't cast two votes for the same book - yes, sure you can change your vote, a woman's privilege. Does that help?

Phyll
August 16, 2003 - 04:13 pm
After you have recuperated from grand baby sitting would you please record my 1st choice as Don Quijote and 2nd choice as Puddn'head Wilson.

Joan Pearson
August 16, 2003 - 04:42 pm
Just on my way out ( for a nap) ...and see your post. Your choices are up there, Phyll!

Marvelle
August 16, 2003 - 04:54 pm
Oh well. Choices.

#1 Hamlet

Marvelle

Barbara St. Aubrey
August 16, 2003 - 06:16 pm
100 years...is my first choice and Kristin Lavansdatter book one is my second choice.

Joan Pearson
August 16, 2003 - 07:43 pm
Oh dear, Marvelle. I see your "oh well" and then just one vote. Let me look again to see if I can understand the first part of the question you posed...
What happens once the votes are in and the second of my preferences misses being number 1 by a vote. Will my #2 vote count in its favor?
I'm sorry...still don't understand. Right now we are trying to pare down this long list. The leaders will become clear by the end of the week. You've posted your number 1 choice and I will put it in the heading now. I don't understand why you don't want to vote for another title ...? I don't understand what effect your second vote could have on your first. But the choice is yours. (Understand that I'm not a good bridge/chess player either. Strategy is not my forte)Barbara, good to hear from you! It has been a while. Hope you are enjoying your summer. Hasn't it gone by quickly? Your choices have been entered into the chart...

Marvelle
August 17, 2003 - 01:14 am
JOAN, I'm not a good bridger or chess player either; and definitely not a strategist. I voted for the one nomination I was sure about but couldn't choose between two possibles for second place. Don't worry about my vague question.

Marvelle

georgehd
August 17, 2003 - 05:45 am
I believe that 100 years has three votes - see posts 433, 441, 421. You can tell I am rooting for it.

And I would add my second choice of Mark Twain. Never read this one.

Joan Pearson
August 17, 2003 - 09:35 am
George, I count only two official votes for 100 years at this point. Anything msntioned before Saturday, August 16 during the nomination period has not been counted as a vote. I thought that was clear. To be sure, I'll contact all who have posted to let them know that the vote count reflects only votes cast since Saturday, the 16th.

I WILL enter your vote for Mark Twain right now.

BaBi
August 17, 2003 - 12:56 pm
On asking myself what would I really like to read ( for the first or the second time) I am casting my votes for: (l)Mill on the Floss and (2) The Golden Bowl. I like Eliot, and I would like to read a James book that doesn't have a gloomy ending. ...Babi

Joan Pearson
August 17, 2003 - 03:47 pm
BaBi, I think the Golden Bowl would be an interesting choice. Both of your votes have been entered. Thanks!

Marvelle
August 17, 2003 - 04:34 pm
There is a modern movie adapted from "The Golden Bowl" and has the same title. It cuts and changes a great deal of the story. The movie becomes its own statement and a completely different story from James' novel which is a shame. James' novel "The Golden Bowl" is beautifully done.

Marvelle

Justin
August 17, 2003 - 06:22 pm
My choices are as follows: #1 is the Golden Bowl; # 2 is Pudd'n head Wilson.

Joan Pearson
August 17, 2003 - 07:00 pm
Thanks, Justin! Your choices are up there!

Jo Meander
August 17, 2003 - 10:43 pm
#1, Pudd'nhead Wilson and #2 Hamlet.

Joan Pearson
August 18, 2003 - 04:53 am
Good morning, Jo! Puddn'head is enjoying a surge!

ALF
August 18, 2003 - 04:58 am
I would love to read a TWAIN story. It must be I feel the need to giggle and chuckle after leaving all of my grandbabies behind.

Joan Pearson
August 18, 2003 - 05:34 am
ANDY, I take it that Puddn'head is your first choice? Your second?

JudytheKay
August 18, 2003 - 06:45 am
Please count my vote for "100 Years of Solitude"

Judy

ALF
August 18, 2003 - 07:41 am

MegR
August 18, 2003 - 01:59 pm
Just returned to the burgh. Not sure if it's too late to vote or not. My first pick is 100 Years of Solitude. Second choice is Hamlet. Could quite happily reverse order of these too! Meg R

Joan Pearson
August 18, 2003 - 04:14 pm
Gee, Meg, I'm sorry. I forgot to chance the information in the heading! We'll vote on this list for a few more days and then put up the leaders for a final vote on the weekend.

Your first and second choices have been recorded, Andy's second and Judy, you still have a second choice if you wish to use it?

horselover
August 18, 2003 - 05:22 pm
Joan, Here is my official vote:


#1 "100 Years of Solitude" (Have never read it, and everyone is always talking about it.

#2 "The Golden Bowl" (Have only seen the masterpiece theater version.)

Deems
August 18, 2003 - 05:31 pm
1. 100 Years of Solitude 2. Puddn'head Wilson

Joan Pearson
August 18, 2003 - 07:58 pm
Thanks Maryal & Horselover - both of your choices are entered - we've got a real horserace going, it would appear!

Louise Licht
August 19, 2003 - 08:50 am
Hi all - I'm back!

I'll vote for James and Elliot.

Guess I'm stuck in the 19th Century.

ALF
August 19, 2003 - 12:42 pm
Ou Great Books Meeting Club in town has settled on Emma and The Invisible Man to read. I wish we had one of those as a choice. It sure would make keeping up with all of my reading easier.

Deems
August 19, 2003 - 12:48 pm
C'mon, Andy! I know that you read ALL the time. You go through way more books than I do. You'll like Emma, I predict. I've taught Invisible Man if you get stuck with that one.

Joan Pearson
August 19, 2003 - 01:16 pm
Oh Louise, it is so good to hear from you. I was so sorry to hear about David's passing. What a dear brave man he was. I have put your choices up in the chart, and even if they are not selected, hope that you will be a part of the discussion, no matter what it is.

Andy, it is sorta, kinda late to be nominating. Even if I were to put the two choices into the heading at this point, I'm not sure there would be a great change of heart...what do you think? Want to try it?

pedln
August 19, 2003 - 09:26 pm
Have read little and know little of Latin American writers, so vote NO. 1 is for Marquez. I don't think I'd ever read it on my own, but with you all for support I just might manage.

NO. 2 is a harder choice, but my Scandinavian heritage is calling -- so that vote is for Undset.

georgehd
August 20, 2003 - 04:54 am
I note that there is now a Second and Final Vote. What does that mean? I thought voting was for one week and was over on Friday. It would appear that 100 Years has enough votes for a discussion no matter what. Though difficult, it is one of the great books of our time.

ALF
August 20, 2003 - 05:04 am
Oh my goodness Joan, I was just kidding. I would never attempt to go in and change anything at this late date.

Joan Pearson
August 20, 2003 - 05:53 am
hahaaha, Andy, I would have done it, you know that.

Pedln, your choices are up there, as are mine. I did not vote for St. Joan this time, but DID go with Cervantes.

George, we have the second vote to assure the best possible participation. The first vote is always personal druthers. When the list is pared down, there is quite often a change in what seems obvious the first go round as the "scattered votes" are cast for one of the leaders...

JudytheKay
August 20, 2003 - 12:46 pm
Forgot I could put in 2nd choice - guess it will "the Golden Bowl". Thanks for the reminder. Judy

Lady C
August 20, 2003 - 02:12 pm
Hi all! Haven't posted in ages( just about have time to read the wonderful posts of others) but do read as much as possible so at least I know what you all are talking about. I love Henry James and vote for The Golden Bowl as first choice, and Kristin Lavrensdatter as second. I'd be happy with either one. Will follow the voting with interest.

Joan Pearson
August 20, 2003 - 02:30 pm
Judy, glad to see you made it back to cast your second vote. M'Lady, your choices have been entered as well..

Traude S
August 21, 2003 - 07:41 pm
JOAN, sorry to be late.

First choice : One Hundred Days of Solitude. No second choice.

Harold Arnold
August 21, 2003 - 07:57 pm
First Choice, St Joan; no second choice.

Joan Pearson
August 22, 2003 - 03:11 am
Thanks, Traude and Harold!

Joan Pearson
August 22, 2003 - 08:12 pm
This is it, the home stretch. By the end of the week we will have a winner that reflects the wishes of the greatest possible number of voters and hopefully, participants in the upcoming Great Books discussion. Thanks for all of your input that brought us this far, folks!

Justin
August 22, 2003 - 11:51 pm
James first. Twain second.

Hats
August 23, 2003 - 03:24 am
Puddn'head Wilson first choice. Hamlet second choice.

georgehd
August 23, 2003 - 05:37 am
100 years first, Hamlet second

Phyll
August 23, 2003 - 06:50 am

Joan Pearson
August 23, 2003 - 07:05 am
The chart in the heading indicates the choices of Phyll, George, Justin, Hats and myself. Am about to contact the others now. We will keep this open through the coming week and unless there is a tie, we will have arrived at the next GB adventure. (We have had run-off votes because of a tie in the final vote a number of times over the years...

This has been an interesting selection this time! What a range to choose from!

Louise Licht
August 23, 2003 - 07:57 am
If this is a re-count then I'll choose "Golden Bowl" and "Puddin Head Wilson" Have a great weekend all!

pedln
August 23, 2003 - 07:58 am
#1. -- 100 years of Solitude

#2. -- Golden Bowl

Joan Pearson
August 23, 2003 - 08:23 am
Louise, not a recount, but a revote in a smaller pool...this method is quite "scientific" carefully designed to capture the interest of the greatest number of participants when we get to the actual discussion. It often has surprising results.

Your choice and Pedln's have been added...

robert b. iadeluca
August 23, 2003 - 08:39 am
This is probably a very minor item but I keep seeing postings about "Don Quijote" and I always thought it was "Don QuiXote." Am I remembering wrong?

Robby

BaBi
August 23, 2003 - 08:54 am
FIRST CHOICE: GOLDEN BOWL SECOND CHOICE: PUDD'NHEAD WILSON

MegR
August 23, 2003 - 09:34 am
Maryal & Joan,

My first choice is that glorious One Hundred Years of Solitude - which won the Nobel Prize! Second is Hamlet 'cause I just adore old Willie S!

MegR

JudytheKay
August 23, 2003 - 11:23 am
First choice is Marquez, second is James.

Judy

Barbara St. Aubrey
August 23, 2003 - 12:10 pm
#1 One Hundred Years of Solitude - #2 is hard I am caught between The Golden Bowl and Pudd'n Head - I will come back later with choice number 2

Lady C
August 23, 2003 - 02:14 pm
I'm still with James for the first choice, but since Undset has been axed I'll go with Cervantes as second choice. When do we start?

Joan Pearson
August 23, 2003 - 02:39 pm
I believe the chart is up to the minute...Thank you!
Robby, if you click the Cervantes title for the Raffel translation, you'll understand why the Quijote.
Carolyn, we will be starting in the latefall after some other discussions and vacations. Maryal and I will let you know...

Faithr
August 23, 2003 - 03:53 pm
Vote for Don Quijote 1st choice...Puddin'head Wilson 2nd choice...faith

Traude S
August 23, 2003 - 05:03 pm
I had only a First Choice yesterday : One Hundred Years of Solitude;

would now like to add Puddn'head Wilson as Second Choice.

The outcome should be interesting !!

T

Joan Pearson
August 23, 2003 - 06:26 pm
Traude and Faith, your FINAL VOTES have been entered...

ALF
August 23, 2003 - 07:21 pm
Pudd-n head #1 and 100 yrs. #2.

Deems
August 23, 2003 - 08:06 pm
1. 100 Years
2. Hamlet

Marvelle
August 23, 2003 - 09:10 pm
#1 Hamlet

#2 Don Quijote

Marvelle

Jo Meander
August 23, 2003 - 11:11 pm
1. Puddn'head
2. 100 Years


It's a great list. Could we revisit the Don Quixote (or Quijote) idea next year?

Joan Pearson
August 24, 2003 - 08:43 am
Alf, Marvelle, Maryal and Jo - just put your choices up. Jo, yes, let's do. We'll leave the four runners-up to start the nominations next time...

georgehd
August 25, 2003 - 01:36 pm
Steinbeck's East of Eden is on the best seller list. I have not read it but would be eager to do so if we could organize a discussion group about it.

Joan Pearson
August 25, 2003 - 02:37 pm
Either today or tomorrow, you will hear of an opportunity to nominate East of Eden, not as a Great Book discussion, but in one of our other discussions we will be opening the November Book Club Online selection up to a vote just as we have done here...(Stay tuned, you've heard it here first!)

George...we're open for business in the Community Center - you can nominate your choice Here!

Carolyn Andersen
August 26, 2003 - 02:16 pm
First: García Marquez --- Second: Twain --CarolynA

Joan Pearson
August 27, 2003 - 03:11 am
Carolyn! Gee it's good to hear from you all the way from Norway! Your vote has been registered and we hope (since it looks as if your preference just may be the selection) - that you will be joining us for the actual discussion. Welcome Home!

We'll stay open for some last minute votes, since we DID announce that the polls would stay open until Friday, we'd better stick to tha...

Deems
August 27, 2003 - 07:56 am
Yes, Joan, by all means keep the polls open until the announced date or someone may demand a recount. We want to avoid any problems with hanging chads. Remember those?

ALF
August 27, 2003 - 08:57 am
100 Years of Solitude by Marquez. Is this the book written in 1990 and a review that describes it as "lunacy being the norm" throughout? Do I have the right great book?

BaBi
August 27, 2003 - 09:03 am
I admit being scared off the Marquez book since somewhat described it as more convoluted than James Joyce. I can't even read Joyce! ..Babi

Deems
August 27, 2003 - 09:11 am
Babi--Not to worry. Joyce is convoluted in a different way. Marquez's language and sentences can be understood. I think that it's just that there are many generations discussed and twists and turns in the plot. My daughter assures me that he is nothing like Joyce.

ALF
August 27, 2003 - 09:38 am
Is it Gabriel Garcia Marquez, then?

Deems
August 27, 2003 - 10:21 am
Andy---Polls still open, but it sure looks that way from the vote so far. Perhaps a last minute rush to vote will occur?

MegR
August 27, 2003 - 12:12 pm
BaBi, Maryal's right! Gabriel Garcia Marquez is understandable & you'll love him once we get into the book. This one's magical and there are images in it that will be permanently implanted in your memory after you read it. This one will truly be an adventure for a new or returning reader!!! Yippeeeee!

Megr

Kathleen Zobel
August 27, 2003 - 05:09 pm
I've been unable to access the Internet since the blackout. I'm back on line via Dial=Up until Verizon repairs something or other in the Central Station.

My vote for #1 is Don Quijote (can't wait, am starting the the Introduction !)

For #2: The Golden Bowl

Joan Pearson
August 27, 2003 - 06:14 pm
kathleen, one of our New Yorkers! THe black out! So glad you made it in here...and love your optimism! We still have two more days...stranger things have happened!

Deems
August 27, 2003 - 06:19 pm
Joan--Our power went out yesterday afternoon about five and still isn't on. Wires down up the street, apparently one of them is the main feed line. One block away, power. Here and north, no power.

I'm on a laptop which daughter charged at her office--about four blocks away. They have power there. She says I just have to get over my habit of multi-tasking. She's just jealous that I can do three things at once!

Joan Pearson
August 30, 2003 - 07:00 pm
The meat, the meat, did you save the meat, Maryal?
We have a winner...come November 15, we will begin our discussion of 100 Years of Solitude. Sounds good to me!

MegR
August 30, 2003 - 07:07 pm
Well, Maryal & Joan, count me in for Marquez on Nov. 15!!!! I'm really excited that this was the final choice this time! Am even more excited to revisit this book again. First read it when Gregory Rabassa's 1st US translation was issued decades ago! MegR

pedln
August 30, 2003 - 08:54 pm
This sounds like a great choice. I've never read him, but I'm certainly going to try. Glad to hear he's easy to understand.

Maryal, my Bethesda granddaughters' schools (Pyle & Bradley Hills) were closed Wednesday because of no power, although they had power at home. Have they determined yet what happened?

Phyll
August 31, 2003 - 07:46 am
I am going to depend on Joan and the Prof. (Maryal) to lead me through this. I picked up a copy and when I read the first page I immediately had a dozen questions (doubts?) to bring up. Should be an interesting discussion and I look forward to it.

betty gregory
September 4, 2003 - 11:54 pm
Babi, the only writer I've read that sounds like Marquez is Isabel Allende (House of the Spirits, Daughter of Fortune)....she's been compared to him, though he won the nobel prize and his writing is that much better than hers, at least to my ears. I loved, loved reading his Love in the Time of Cholera, which was my first experience in letting a writer take me outside the strict realism I was accustomed to. There is a magical quality in his writing that I would not have guessed I would like, but his writing is so wonderful that you soon trust him to take you anywhere. There are only a handful of books that I think of as turning points in my reading. His Love in the Time of Cholera was a turning point. I've been wanting to read 100 Years for a long time and am almost certain it's on my shelves somewhere.

Betty

Joan Pearson
September 5, 2003 - 06:47 am
Oh, Betty, does this mean you are planning to join us! Wonderful! Quick! Check your shelves...

BaBi
September 5, 2003 - 11:18 am
Thanks, Betty, but I didn't like "House of Spirits" either. I read a good portion of it and gave it up. I found the Marquez book (under 'Garcia') in my library, picked it up and read a bit at random. Didn't like it at all. Guess Allende and Marquez just aren't my type. ...Babi

hegeso
September 7, 2003 - 08:23 am
Betty Gregory, I love, love, love "Love in Times of Cholera". It is a wonderful story of the ups-and-downs of love and marriage.

Allende? I think she is closer to Carlos Fuentes than to Garcia Marquez. I never had a problem with the so-called magical realism, and am an avid reader of Fuentes, Jorge Luis Borges, and Bioy Casares, inter alia.

Excuse my spam; this thread is supposed to be about "100 Years of Solitude".

pedln
September 10, 2003 - 10:15 am
Babi, I didn't care for Allende's House of Spirits either, but I loved her Daughter of Fortune and look forward to reading the sort of sequel to it -- don't remember the name.

You found "Solitude's" author under Garcia because that is his true last name -- his father's last name (1st appellido). Marquez is his mother's last name, his (2nd appellido). His mother is Sra. Firstname Marquez de Garcia.

Joan Pearson
January 2, 2004 - 05:58 pm
We are still reading discussing Marquez'100 Years of Solitude but there has been some discussion about the upcoming centenary of James Joyce's Ulysses...is this the year to read it? From Marvelle
2004 is the centenary. You know that each year on June 16th there's a Bloomsday celebration in Dublin and all over the world each year. June 16th is the time that James Joyce had his first date with Nora. A week later they ran off together to the Continent and he spent the rest of his life with her and June 16th was important to him for that reason and also because it was the start of his life as a worldly literary man (liberated from the stifling atmosphere of Dublin). To co mmemorate this date, "Ulysses"'s action takes part all on one day - June 16th. Thus, the yearly Bloomsday celebration. I decided this year to really study "Ulysses" and I've ordered a bunch of books about Ulysses as well as the Gabler critical edition that I've heard so much about.
Think about it! Happy New Year, everybody!

georgehd
January 11, 2004 - 03:58 am
I already own Ulysses and would be willing to give it a try.

Lou2
January 11, 2004 - 07:12 am
Now sure how I have missed this discussion, but I have!! I was asked to come in here and say, I have Ulysses and would love to try it with you all. And my pledge is that I will bring something to the table, even if it's just scraps!!

Lou

Joan Pearson
January 11, 2004 - 02:12 pm
Ulysses on Bloomsday *June 16. What could be a better time for it!

Lou2
January 11, 2004 - 02:36 pm
I'll be there, Lord willing and the creeks don't rise!!

Lou

Marvelle
January 22, 2004 - 03:16 pm
Count me in for Ulysses. The centenary (June 16, 1904) is a perfect time to read and discuss it.

JOAN, I had a hard time finding Great Books, it's so low on the B&L page because of, I think, all the past, future, present discussions that are listed. Is it possible for Great Books, or the entire "Suggestions and Nominations," to be bumped up the page so its more visible? Or maybe place the closed read-only discussions lower on the page, in a category of their own, until they're archived? (Don't know if any of these suggestions are feasible.)

Marvelle

Joan Pearson
February 10, 2004 - 10:42 am
We are in the final week of 100 Years of Solitude...can you believe that we have been discussing this book since November 15?

It's that time to move this discussion up to the Upcoming Attractions as we talk about the next one up for discussion.

We like to have a majority decision before the selection. I'd like to hear from you on two proposals...
  • For March: Puddn'Head Wilson - as you see on the chart, it was one of the finalists in November. By some lucky coincidence, the people from the Mark Twain House were told about our site by the author, Wally Lamb, who recently participated in our SN discussion of his latest book. The Mark Twain education department has volunteered to make their extensive files available to us by participating in a discussion of Puddn' Head Wilson.

    I just finished the book...it is not long, a mere 187 pages, and it would not take us more than four weeks to read and discuss it, (unlike many GB's that we have discussed in the past.) Have you read Twain lately? Have you ever read this one? I had forgotten the wit and wisdom of the man. His style is uniquely his own - reminds me of GG.Marquez!

  • For June - the buzz in the halls lately is all about James Joyce's Ulysses, considered by many to be THE book of the ages. Have you ever read it? Have you ever thought of reading it? A good number of Great Bookies have been talking about discussing this book over the years, more so lately because this is the 100th year anniversary of its publication. It would be a real challenge. Can't promise a short one-month discussion like Puddn' Head...but need a hearty band of readers before attempting this challenging read.

  • Looking forward to hearing what you think of plans A...and B!
    ps. kathleen zobel, let me assure you, Don Quixote has not been forgotten!

    Faithr
    February 10, 2004 - 11:59 am
    Thanks for not forgetting Don Quixote as I want to read and discuss this book. I have no copy and dont know what translation to get but will wait and see what the voters do.

    Puddin Head Wilson ..I read this a long time ago and have totally forgotten it. I had at one time a complete Twain collection. I inherited a Library from my father in law and had Twain, Bret Harte, and Kipling in complete sets in beautiful bindings. They were stolen way back in the sixties.

    Anyway, I would be up for a four week discussion before we go into a serious long discussion like Ulysses which I have never been able to read past the first few pages. And I am a good reader I think. It is just that all the rhythms are off in the sentences and I cant follow them. I found myself breaking them down and rewriting what I though they meant. So I dont know if I would vote for that discussion. Sort of puts me off. faith

    JoanK
    February 10, 2004 - 03:49 pm
    Hi. I'm glad you moved this discussion up, because I hadn't noticed it before.

    I have read Ulysses, and was frustrated at the time because I didn't know anyone I could discuss it with. I would love to join your discussion. It is a tough book. I read it with some auxillary texts and Homer in front of me. I found, for me, if I tried to understand each reference (and there are volumes and volumes that do this) I got bogged down, and lost interest. So I tried instead to understand the major themes and analogies.

    I would also love Puddin Head Wilson. My father was a Twain fanatic, and read him to us as bedtime stories, so I have read a lot of him, including his essays, but not that book (which may not be suitable for children?)

    Deems
    February 10, 2004 - 03:55 pm
    The really good news about Pudd'n'head Wilson is that it will be available in libraries nearly everywhere.

    I love Twain and look forward to this discussion. It's been years since I've read Pudd'n'head.

    Hats
    February 10, 2004 - 04:18 pm
    I would like to join in and read Puddn'head Wilson.

    Marvelle
    February 10, 2004 - 05:11 pm
    JoanK, that's how I've read Ulysses. First I read it for the story, and having a basic idea of Homer's Odyssey does help (and those who've read the Odyssey can help others with a synopsis). While reading Joyce's U one gathers a basic understanding of themes, basic symbolism, analogies, plot. I read U through without trying to get every little reference. Later readings I was able to understand more. One hint: if the short bursts of stream of consciousness confuse, try saying them aloud, as if you were the person/character talking to yourself, rather absent mindedly. These interior thoughts are only semi-formed.

    I'll have to check my schedule for Twain's Puddn'head Wilson. Is there any other Twain title to consider? Still, Twain is good whichever story is chosen and the Mark Twain education department opening up their files to us is an incredible gift.

    No matter my schedule, however, I'd make room for a discussion of Ulysses as well as Don Quixote. There are two recent translations of DQ that have received high praise - Edith Grossman's and Burton Raffel's. There are other translations as well, each with their own good points. I like what Edith Grossman wrote in her 'Notes to the Reader' - basically, she said about translations of DQ (but which also pertains to translations of any literary work): 'don't sweat the small stuff.'

    Grossman: "Every translator has to live with the kind of pedantic critic who is always ready to pounce at an infelicitous phrase or misinterpreted word in a book that can be hundreds of pages long. I had two or three soul-searing nightmares about rampaging hordes laying waste to my translation .... The prospect of translating was stupefying.

    "Shortly before I began work, while I was wrestling with the question of what kind of voice would be most appropriate for the translation of a book written some four hundred years ago, I mentioned my fears to Julian Rios, the Spanish novelist.... He told me not to be afraid: Cervantes, he said, was our most modern writer, and what I had to do was to translate him the way I translated everyone else -- that is, the contemporary authors whose works I have brought over into English....

    "I believe that my primary obligation as a literary translator is to recreate for the reader in English the experience of the reader in Spanish.... When Cervantes wrote Don Quixote, his language was not archaic or quaint. He wrote in a crackling, up-to-date Spanish that was an intrinsic part of his time (this is instantly apparent when he has Don Quixote, in transports of knightly madness, speak in the old-fashioned idiom of the novels of chivalry), a modern language that both reflected and helped to shape the way people experienced the world. This meant that I did not need to find a special, anachronistic, somehow-seventeenth-century voice but could translate his astonishingly fine writing into contemporary English."

    Anyway, with translations 'don't sweat the small stuff.' The large stuff is reserved for changing the meaning or tone of the original which are no-nos. Otherwise, each translation has individual merits.

    Marvelle

    georgehd
    February 11, 2004 - 07:15 am
    I will get out the Odyssey which I read some time ago and also look on line for links to Ulysses by Joyce.

    Joan Pearson
    February 11, 2004 - 08:51 am
    Good morning, George. I take that as a yes on Ulysses in June then? Along with Maryal and myself, you, Lou, Marvelle, JoanK, I count 6 for Ulysses then. If your name is not included that means I skipped something or did not understand your intention, so post again, will you?

    For Puddn'Head, along with Maryal and myself, I count Faith, JoanK and Hats...check me on this too?

    Thanks, everyone!

    Ginny
    February 11, 2004 - 08:59 am
    me too, I would not miss this oppportunity, count me in!

    ginny

    ALF
    February 11, 2004 - 10:57 am
    Only the Lord knows where I'll be, but count me in for Puddn' Head, too.

    Scrawler
    February 11, 2004 - 11:05 am
    I'll go with Twain, but I'm going to pass with Joyce. He's just too depressing for summer reading.

    Any chance of reading James or Shakespeare in the summer and reading Joyce later on in the fall.

    JoanK
    February 11, 2004 - 01:40 pm
    Or if you all haven't read the Odyssey , we could read that first and then Joyce.

    Lou2
    February 11, 2004 - 04:17 pm
    Or if you all haven't read the Odyssey , we could read that first and then Joyce.


    JoanK had a good idea... I have hoped to read the Odyssey before we read Ulysses, but it would be wonderful to read it with this group instead of trying to muddle through myself... but I'm up for whatever you all decide...

    Passing on Twain for now...

    Lou

    Ginny
    February 11, 2004 - 04:20 pm
    Oh the wonderful Odyssey, yes we read the Odyssey, here on SeniorNet, the first ever Great Book we ever read and it was SO fun. Hark, tho, I'm taking a course now in the Iliad, have you read IT lately? There are a lot of translations and the professor is slanting this reading towrd the philosophical issues Homer raises, it's fabulous. Maybe you guys in the Great Books might want to consider for next year the Iliad, there are a million translations out there!

    ginny

    Marvelle
    February 11, 2004 - 05:00 pm
    Joyce is depressing? Not in Ulysses, funny stuff most of it, especially the Cyclops episode which is LOL hilarious. Now Dubliners and Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man - they were quite serious.

    Joyce in June, it's important then if at all, that's the centenary: June 16, 1904 - Joyce's first date with his future wife Nora, and that same date used for Ulysses with the book beginning and ending on June 16, 1904. Should be lots of Joyce events happening at that time too.

    I've started to block out the Odyssey chapters compared to Ulysses with a short one paragraph synopsis of each. I could post those as we progress in the discussion; ALTHOUGH it isn't crucial to know the Odyssey. It's useful, and more fun I think, if you know the basic outline of it, but it isn't necessary for understanding Ulysses.

    _________________________

    Count me in for a discussion also of Don Quixote. I like the idea of Joyce on the centenary in June and then Cervantes in the Fall -- would work well.

    _________________________

    GINNY, the Iliad is a glorious work and easy to read. I took a class on the Iliad also and remember the gods and goddesses playing at being mortals, just like little kids, amidst all the sad carnage of actual mortals at war. Would enjoy discussing the philosophical issues that Homer raised and what GINNY's professor pointed out.

    Sometime I'd like to see us discuss the Oresteia which is a short trilogy; shorter than a novella, and highly pertinent today with its exploration of the themes of murder, revenge, guilt, and justice. A very uplifting work despite the seriousness of the themes, strange to say, but then it was intended to be uplifting after all.

    Marvelle

    JoanK
    February 11, 2004 - 05:23 pm
    I read the Fitzgerald translation of the Odyssey and Iliad. I had read a different translation of the Odyssey, and thought "well, ok". But then I read Fitzgerald and thought "WOW!". He's probably considered dated by now.

    Joan Pearson
    February 11, 2004 - 08:07 pm
    - have added Anne (Scrawler), Andy and Ginny to the Pudd'n Head...Ginny, when you said to count you in, I assumed you were talking about that one discussion and not the other two...or?

    Anne, you must be thinking of Portrait of Artist ...now THAT depressing. We discussed it here several years ago. Oh, I just can't resist getting the raspberries...I pull out this silly Ulysses for Dummies whenever anyone comments that it is too hard. (It is hard, I'll admit that.)

    WE spent almost a year on the Odyssey - was that 1996? 97? That was such fun! We took a small section each week and moved on only when everyone was ready. I read the Fitzgerald... we were all reading different translations, so that when something wasn't quite clear, we would check with the others. Pat W. ended up going to Greece after that - remember? I bought me a lapis necklace...lots of lapis in the Odyssey!

    I'll add you, JoanK to Ulysses and cross fingers that we can talk Scrawler into it. If I've missed anyone in the count, let me know?

    Ginny
    February 12, 2004 - 06:30 am
    Right, Joan, I did mean the Pudd'nhead Wilson, I am very excited about our Great Books and the Mark Twain House collaboration, it's magical and am very grateful to Wally Lamb for opening that door for us, I can't WAIT to see it!

    On the Joyce, on the very day you celebrate, BloomsDay is it? I will think about you all, I will be boarding the wagon lit, the night train sleeping compartment for the Paris-Rome Euro Night train, my favorite train in Europe, and a complete joy, it reminds me of Agatha Christie and the Orient Express, there's a private club car with free drinks where you gather with your fellow murderers (er, travelers) and your own private sleeping quarters, with bathroom and attendant, it's to die for. When the dawn comes you're on the cliffs of the Italian Riviera and the views are breathtaking, and breakfast in bed is served, I'll think of you all but I don't think I'll skip that one hahaahaha

    On the Quixote, sounds good but I need to see what my own schedule will be for fall, sounds like the Great Books is ROLLING in 2004!

    I don't recall the actual date of our Odyssey discussion, our first Great Books discussion, but it sure did spawn a lot of things, didn't it, great beginnings, I do have the first 100 pages printed out and will try to find them for interest sake when I get home, I made a book of them, actually.

    Might be a nostalgic reminder of how far we have come!

    It's interesting to me how different the Iliad is from the Odyssey, Marvelle, you too with the Iliad course! Fascinating, and there are so many other books written on the philosophy of it, including one called Achilles in Vietnam, you get into the whole philosophy of war, someday we might want to try it, Joan K, I would love to hear your take on it also, what a great group here!

    ginny

    Marvelle
    February 12, 2004 - 08:30 am
    GINNY, I'll look for "Achilles in Vietnam" and any other philosophy books. Will have to scrounge for pennies so it may take some time but sounds like it'll be worth it. The "Iliad" is a foundation book.

    JOAN K, I prefer the highly rated Fitzgerald translations for Odyssey and Iliad. Also well received is Fagles who reputedly wrote a more 'muscular' translation of the Iliad. I find Fagles translations to be wonderfully done but any of the other translations also have their merits.

    I remember the cranes in the Iliad as the opposing sides initially face off. When I first read the Iliad that's the image that stunned me and got my attention for good. This is the start of Book 3 before the carnage begins when all is splendid saber-rattling with an ominous indication of what will come:

    "The Trojan squadrons flanked by officers
    drew up and sortied, in a din of arms
    and shouting voices - wave on wave, like cranes
    in clamorous lines before the face of heaven,
    beating away from winter's gloom and storms,
    over the streams of Ocean, hoarsely calling,
    to bring a slaughter on the Pygmy warriors -
    cranes at dawn descending, beaked in cruel attack.
    The Akhaians for their part came on in silence,
    raging under their breath, shoulder to shoulder sworn."

    -- Homer, The Iliad Book 3, translation Robert Fitzgerald

    JOAN P, oh thanks for "Ulysses for Dummies" that is wonderful. If we do have the "Ulysses" discussion that should definitely be in the heading.

    Marvelle

    JoanK
    February 12, 2004 - 11:16 am
    MARVELLE: what a wonderful image. You and Ginny are inspiring me to go back to the Iliad. I see I missed a lot!!

    GINNY: I actually travelled on the Orient Express for three days from Geneva to Athens. It wasn't luxurious: we were broke and went "peasant class". But fun. We were the only English speakers on the train. But we managed to make friends with everyone. I'll never forget how friendly and nice the people in then Yugoslovia were. What a tragedy later.

    Scrawler
    February 12, 2004 - 11:17 am
    Can you tell me which Twain book you will be using so I can get it before the discussion group starts. Thanks

    Anne

    Deems
    February 12, 2004 - 03:54 pm
    Scrawler--We'll be doing Pudd'n'head Wilson, one of Twain's shorter novels (almost a novella). You don't have to worry about editions or translations for this one!

    seitz
    February 15, 2004 - 06:58 am
    I will try and keep up with Joyce. What an interesting group of people read along and respond. I'm getting less intimidated each time I log on.

    Deems
    February 15, 2004 - 11:43 am
    Welcome, seitz!

    We are so glad to have you with us, and we're not intimidating at all. We just all love to read and discuss. All opinions are welcome as are polite arguments. Please pull up a chair and join us.

    Maryal

    Joan Pearson
    February 15, 2004 - 12:18 pm
    I'll add my welcome to Maryal's, Seitz...will put you on the Ulysses list...and Traude has indicated elsewhere she plans to attend Twain's Pudd'nhead Wilson...
    Welcome, Seitz!

    JoanK
    February 15, 2004 - 10:28 pm
    I'll certainly be in for Cervantes. I've always meant to read it.

    Deems
    February 16, 2004 - 12:14 pm
    Welcome, Joan K!!


    How will I ever keep all these Joans straight??

    Maryal

    Faithr
    February 16, 2004 - 02:32 pm
    Well I will be here for Puddin Head and also Cervantes discussion later. I am recovering from a 10 day long cold with a cough that has me all worn out. Today things are lots better. Seems like a long time since I read anything but news and political stuff. I am ready for a new discussion. Faith

    Joan Pearson
    February 16, 2004 - 04:25 pm
    Faith! It is so good to have you back with us. Will add you to Puddin' and to Quixote right away. Welcome back! A steady diet of politics and news can be depressing!

    JoanK, your name is now on all three lists. Super!

    Justin
    May 5, 2004 - 07:02 pm
    I am not going to pass this chance to read and discuss Ulysses. I have read both Odysseus and Ulysses in the past and I will look forward to doing either one or both with you interesting folks on Great Books. June 16th seems like an appropriate time to start.

    Joan Pearson
    May 8, 2004 - 08:19 am
    Justin, while June would have been an appropriate time to begin Ulysses as we noted back in February, we find that we will have to postpone beginning this undertaking for the time being. Summer schedules have a way of interfering with winter planning, which is the case here.

    HOWEVER, we are considering another, less intimidating project for June which we hope you will consider.

    Have you heard of Karen Joy Fowler's new book of fiction - Jane Austen Book Club? This woman can write! Her last book, Sister Noon was a PEN/Faulkner finalist - also a Dublin IMPACT Award nominee.

    This one is irresistable for our group here in Books and Lit. The story is about a book club of six - five women of varying ages from 67 down to 28 - and one young man, who leaves the other members of the club wondering why he was invited. They meet for six months, each month discussing one of Jane Austen's six published works, Though the story is chiefly about the members of the club, you will find yourself scurrying to the book shelf or library to see what you've been missing in Jane Austen's works. The book is simply delicious! A great way to spend the month of June!

    IF there are enough interested in reading/discussing one or more of Jane Austen's works, we might consider that as a Great Books project for the summer until our vacationing/working/travelling DLs and participants have returned.

    Do stop in and look over the proposed fiction for June? And the possibilities of combining this with Jane Austen's works?

    The Jane Austen Book Club

    Marvelle
    June 5, 2004 - 11:21 am
    Hi Everyone,

    I've been offline for a long time due to systems malfunction. Now I have a used (but new to me) computer system which replaces my old webtv unit. After all this time I forgot my old password and had to re-register by adding a "4" to my name.

    I've spent a lot of time reading and writing while offline and its been wonderful. I'm reading Joyce's Ulysses now - June 2004 is the one hundred year anniversary - so won't be available for the later discussion.

    Marvelle

    Deems
    June 5, 2004 - 12:13 pm
    Welcome back, Marvelle! You have been missed. I'll bet that you enjoy the new computer. I've never had WebTV, but I know that computers have way more features.

    Maryal

    Marcie Schwarz
    June 5, 2004 - 09:17 pm
    Welcome back, Marvelle! I was able to change your username back to remove the 4

    ALF
    June 6, 2004 - 05:46 am

    Marvelle
    June 6, 2004 - 08:45 am
    Thanks for the welcome everyone. (Appreciate being able to sign in as just "Marvelle" without the 4.) It's good to be back online.

    I've been reading a lot of the new books that've come out, the latest read was Paul Collins' memoir Not Even Wrong which I highly recommend. I've been relaxing in a comfortable patio chair, stacks of books around me - new issues, classics, my traditional yearly re-reads, nonfiction reference - as I whittle away at these 'to read' piles. One book leads to another, and another, and another .... bliss.

    Marvelle

    Joan Pearson
    June 6, 2004 - 01:22 pm
    We've missed you, Miss! Glad to hear that you are well and happy...and back!

    Love,
    Joan

    Ginny
    July 29, 2004 - 04:49 am
    Those of you who enjoy reading Great Books may be interested to know of one scheduled for this October here in our Books. It is not part of our Great Books Series which you all vote on here but is undeniably a Great Book: The Iliad.

    We are offering this because of several factors: the new interest in and movies about the ancients, including "Troy," and our serendipitious luck in getting Dr. Jonathan Shay who will discuss his landmark Achilles in Vietnam with us in September, in which he continually refers to Homer's Iliad, and Achilles and explains Achilles and the modern combat soldier. It's an incredible work and allows you to understand some of the psychology of and motivations behind the Iliad. What does a 3,000 year old poem have to say to us??

    We read Homer's Odyssey here in 1996 and always said we'd do The Iliad. If you have vaguely wanted to read/ or reread The Iliad, or have been curious about the background of the movie Troy, you are more than welcome to join us here: The Iliad but... whose side will you find yourself on? The Trojans or the Greeks? Is the Trojan Horse in the Iliad? Find out here October 1~!

    Justin
    July 29, 2004 - 10:07 pm
    Joan, Maryal, Ginny: I see Ulysses listed for June. Are we talking about June 2005? We are doing so many classical works at once in Book Discussions that my plate will be overloaded. We are reading Caesar, the Illiad,and Achilles, all at once. A Latin class is also starting and all this following a bout with T.S.Eliot. It would be nice if we could schedule these events so those of us with a classical interest could enjoy them all.

    Marvelle
    July 30, 2004 - 03:21 am
    Hi Justin, Ulysses has been dropped as a discussion but the rest you mentioned are a 'go.' Achilles in Vietnam isn't a classic but a modern non-fiction book about (I think) war combat trauma.

    Marvelle

    Ginny
    July 30, 2004 - 10:37 am
    Justin I must say what a heartening post that was!! I am so glad to see you will be continuing in the Caesar, yes we're really hitting Classics on all burners this fall, and we're so glad we have people who appreciate them.

    Right on, Marvelle, the heading was dated, that WAS June 2004, but it was only suggested and June is over, and I see the heading has already been fixed.

    The Achilles is an incredible thing, there's not too many other books like it, very heavy on The Iliad but is about the parallels of combat, modern war and man in conflict throughout the ages. It may (and it does have a caution) in it, be too much for somebody who served in Vietnam OR their close families, I will try to bring the relevant passages TO the Iliad, thank you both for your interest and support of our programs here.

    (Justin, we're to IMMERSE ourselves in the Classics this fall!!! WHEEEE)

    Justin
    July 30, 2004 - 01:13 pm
    Thank you, Marvelle. I am pleased that Joyce has been postponed. I expect to have a full plate discussing the "classic" works(Ancient Roman and Greek literature) as well as some desirable modern pieces, this fall. I guess Ulysses lost out to Twain's Pudd'n head. I think the work should be retained as a candidate to compete with James' work as well as the others. I take it Joan and Maryal are away.

    Ginny
    July 30, 2004 - 01:54 pm
    Yes, Justin, bingo as always, Joan P and Maryal are both travelling but Maryal will surface first, about August 3 or so in The Waste Land, so I'd drop her a line then and see what she says!

    Marvelle
    July 30, 2004 - 09:51 pm
    June 2004 was the big year for Ulysses, lots of events and various readings to commemorate the 100th anniversary of Joyce's voyage into literary history. I joined a group that read U in June and the discussion was rich and invigorating. While I've done my last reading on Joyce for this year I urge anyone interested in U to join the SN discussion when it is announced. You won't regret it.

    Marvelle

    Ginny
    August 18, 2004 - 07:50 am
    So far as I now know, any plans for a Ulysses discussion here in the B&L of SeniorNet for this fall are on hold, so to while away the hours with a "good book," an undeniable classic, you all may want to consider our new news, which I personally think is just smashing!

    We are very proud and very grateful to announce that we have Dr. Stanley Lombardo, distinguished Classicist, and just a super humble fabulous person, joining us in our October 1 discussion of The Iliad. What with all the Olympics you may have seen the Mask of Menelaus going by in the opening ceremony or you may have seen the movie Troy, please do not miss this golden opportunity to read one of the greatest classics in the world, and ask any question you have of one of the foremost authorities in the field. The opportunity to discuss The Iliad with Dr. Stanley Lombardo would never have ever been mine living here on a farm in SC, I would never even have ever had the chance to speak to him: it's one of the miracles of the internet and a bonus, an advantage of SeniorNet's wonderful Books & Literature area, I do hope you will find some time to enter on this journey with us.

    Here is an Interview with Dr. Stanley Lombardo: on Homer, poetry, the art of translating, Fitzgerald, Fagles, Lattimore and MORE... we hope it sparks your interest, and you will consider joining us. It's hard to know when you will ever have a chance to hear the answers he can give to any question on Homer, The Iliad, or anything else of this subject.

    Join us in The Iliad October 1.

    Everyone is welcome!

    Ginny
    September 27, 2004 - 06:22 am
    The Iliad will begin a discussion on October 1, using the Lombardo translation. While not a part of our original Great Books Series, we are very excited to have the opportunity to talk to Dr. Stanley Lombardo, distinguished classicist and translator, whose translation we will be using, and Dr. Mark Stone, whose course generated this discussion, who will discuss the philosophical issues in the Iliad! Both of these men will be participating in the discussion. If you like Great Books, this is an unparalleled opportunity to learn, plan to spend a couple of months with us and learn about The Iliad!

    Joan Pearson
    March 3, 2005 - 07:46 pm
    Are you ready for a Great Book? There has been some talk in the halls lately on Bernard Shaw's Saint Joan. Would you like to do a back-to-back discussion of two of his plays and include Pygmalion? Joan and the malleable Eliza Dolittle should provide an interesting contrast.

    Here's a bit on St. Joan from one of the Publishers (there's a link in the heading -
    "With Saint Joan, Shaw reached the height of his fame as a dramatist. In this magnificent play he distilled many of the ideas he had been trying to express in earlier works on the subjects of politics, religion and creative evolution. Fascinated by the story of Joan of Arc, but unhappy with the way she had traditionally been depicted, Shaw wanted to remove 'the whitewash which disfigures her beyond recognition'. He presents a realistic Joan: proud, intolerant, naive, foolhardy, always brave -- a rebel who challenged the conventions and values of her day."

    If you would prefer to nominate another Great Book instead, please state your preference in a post here. Every title will be considered. We'd like to get started on a new discussion in May. It's time!

    Looking forward to gathering here with old friends...and NEW!

    Scrawler
    March 4, 2005 - 11:06 am
    This sounds like a fascinating project for discussion. Count me in.

    Margaret Burke
    March 4, 2005 - 11:15 am
    I know that I have not too much to contribute as I'm really not very knowledgable, I am learning so much by just following your discussions.You can be sure that I will be joining you.

    JoanK
    March 4, 2005 - 11:20 am
    Sounds good. Since my mother named me after Saint Joan, I really should learn all about her.

    Joan Pearson
    March 4, 2005 - 07:20 pm
    Margaret, NO ONE is as knowledgeable about St. Joan as we Joans who bear her name. A fascinating historical figure, whose story reads like fiction. My birthday is May 30 - the date she was burned at the stake.

    It should be an interesting to experience Shaw's treatment of this interesting character. Am so happy that you, Scrawler and another Joan - JoanK will be be joining us.

    Bernard Shaw will not let us down. I read that the author never liked his first name, George, never liked it and never used it. So I won't either. My husband is another who goes by his middle name. Nobody knows his first name is "Donald" - We had an interesting discussion yesterday while walking through the cemetery at the end of the block. Does he want at least the first letter of his first name on his tombstone. I won't tell you his answer...getting off the track. But will say that I won't be using "George" when referring to Bernard Shaw.

    Welcome!

    JoanK
    March 4, 2005 - 07:22 pm
    My husband goes by hs middle name too. I never asked him about his tombstone. Guess I'd better.

    Kathleen Zobel
    March 9, 2005 - 11:35 am
    A discussion including Shaw'sPlays???!!! I'd Pay to join! and double for Pygmalion.

    Count me in., Please. Is there a particular book I could track down now?

    Kathleen Zobel

    Joan Pearson
    March 9, 2005 - 07:44 pm
    hahaha, Kathleen, step right up to the cash register, the line is forming to the right! No, I have no particular edition in mind...I have an old copy of St. Joan - a 1957 paperback - which sold back then for $.50! I plan to toss it in my carry-on and take it to Ireland with me on Monday...touch it to the Blarney Stone for good luck. Actually, aren't you supposed to become eloquent if you kiss it?

    When I get back, I'll look into what's available now. I'm sure the only difference in the editions is the quality of the Introductions. I bet my 1957 intro differs from any you'd pick up in the stores today.

    I also plan to reread one of my biographies on Joan, as Shaw's historical facts are skewed to the English version of what happened. Shaw...like so many of Ireland's finest moved to London when he was twenty - James Joyce was one. Except Joyce wrote over and again of his boyhood in Ireland. Not so Shaw.

    Kathleen, it will be so good to have you join us!

    Kathleen Zobel
    March 10, 2005 - 07:09 pm
    Jo3 an, have a great trip, as I'm sure you will. I understand the scenery is beautiful. My Irish Grandmother often told us about the green hills of Wicklow.

    I'll check Shaw's Joan and the plays, and let you know.

    Bon Voyage!! Kathleen

    Jackie Lynch
    March 14, 2005 - 05:53 am
    I picked up a fine Penguin edition at B&N. I haven't read Pygmalion in years, so will be happy to be reconnected with it. Count me in.

    Joan Pearson
    March 14, 2005 - 06:17 am
    Jackie, so happy to hear you will be joining us! Shaw's treatment of these two "heroines" will be great for discussion, I can tell that right now.

    What interests me about Shaw is that his plays have been produced without a break since the twenties - a man for the ages. Here in the Washington, DC area there are three productions on the stage right now - "Pygmalion", "St. Joan" and a comedy, "You Never Can Tell"...

    Am leaving this evening for a short trip to Ireland - need to "research" how the Irish celebrate St. Patrick's Day and plan to check out Shaw's birthplace and childhood home while there too, though he left Ireland (as so many others) at the young age of 20. Those childhood years were formative however. Will share results of "research" upon return.

    Again, Welcome!

    Jackie Lynch
    March 16, 2005 - 05:41 pm
    Thanks, Joan. Hope to see some pix of the Shavian stomping grounds. Have fun!

    Joan Pearson
    March 31, 2005 - 03:29 am
    Good morning! I was going to say "Top o'the morninto you", but no one EVER said that once throughout the whole trip! No, no, we didn't sleep the mornings away - we were out bright and early each morning...plenty of opportunity to hear - overhear the expression. We need to go back - to the western parts next time. Maybe it's a regional thing.

    Am in the process of sorting photos and will write up a photo album of the trip when my landing wheels bump the ground. Not quite there yet,

    Ready or not, we're ready to open the new St.Joan/Pygmalion site. If you read this and are interested in joining us in May, please pop in (click the link) and make your reservation so we know how many seats to block off for our party.

    We need to make a decision over there too - we'll definitely go Shavian, but which would you like to begin with? The familiar Eliza Doolittle, or the somewhat controversial Joan?

    ps. If your name is "Joan" or "Eliza" - or any form of those names, you get box seats!

    Joan Pearson
    April 26, 2005 - 06:15 pm
    When in Ireland, I was reminded of a long standing wish to read Jonathan Swift's "Gullivers Travels". I think it would be great fun to read together if there is interest?

    Joan Pearson
    July 5, 2005 - 08:21 am
    All ideas for future Great Books' discussions are welcome here. Just having completed two of Bernard Shaw's plays, "Saint Joan" and "Pygmalion," the floor is wide open for suggestions. There are lists of Great Books in the heading - also, titles we have already discussed on SeniorNet.

    Looking forward to hearing from YOU!

    JoanK
    July 5, 2005 - 06:34 pm
    I've always meant to read Gulliver's Travels.

    marni0308
    July 6, 2005 - 11:47 am
    I just checked out this book club. Wow. There are some pretty heavy selections on the list! This is a terrific book club!

    I'd be interested in Gulliver's Travels, also. Another I saw on the list is Don Quixote. Has the group read that one yet?

    I saw several Eugene O'Neill selections on the lists and it brought back memories. I grew up in New London, CT in a house overlooking the Thames River just down the street from the house where the O'Neill family spent their summers - the house depicted in Long Day's Journey Into Night. My friend lived in a large house on the water farther down the same street - it used to be the casino where O'Neill spent a lot of time drinking. It's fun to see his works on lists of great literature of the western world. O'Neill was sort of black-listed in New London for many years, apparently because he was unhappy there and had nothing good to say about the city. A great moment in my life happened when I was 13 and Katherine Hepburn stopped to ask me for directions to the Eugene O'Neill house - she was playing the role of Mary Tyrone in the film Long Day's Journey Into Night and was researching for the role. What a thrill for me!

    I'm looking forward to reading some great works!

    Marni

    Joan Pearson
    July 6, 2005 - 12:04 pm
    Marni, JoanK...I am hearing a second/third on the Gulliver's Travels - will put it up as our first nomination. I have never read it. Everytime I see one of those "Gulliver's Travels" moving trucks, I feel guilty that I don't Jonathan Swift's tale at all. Yet I know of his Lilliputs, etc. This past spring we were in Dublin...in St. Patrick's Cathedral where Swift is buried and greatly revered. I felt like a phoney taking photos, etc.

    I just know the perennial "Don" lovers will be here to nominate that one too Marni. Keep an eye on this discussion. The Great Bookies always have always come up with winners! I guess it's because they have withstood the test of time. They wouldn't have done so if they weren't GOOD Great books!

    Kayteez
    July 6, 2005 - 02:13 pm
    I was delighted to see Don Quijote chosen. I'm all for starting it now.(:

    Joan Pearson
    July 6, 2005 - 03:20 pm
    Now kathleen, note that these are just the nominations! You've been disappointed before when Cervantes ran a close second. More than once. I have a new copy sitting here on my shelf since that nomination period. Thought we had it that time!

    kiwi lady
    July 6, 2005 - 04:10 pm
    I first read Gullivers travels at 8yrs old. We had essay competitions at school yearly and I always won and got a book voucher for quite a few dollars. One of the books I bought at 8 was a huge Compendium of all sorts of authors including Jonathon Swift, Hans Christian Anderson. The Brothers Grimm etc. The book was huge - like a family bible with amazing ink drawings. It got destroyed in a flood we had in the basement at my Mums when I was an adult. The only way I could read the book was to open it on the floor and lie on my tummy to read it. The book was really enormous. I read Gullivers travels hundreds of times over the years, Another of my favorites from the book was Tom and the Water Babies. As a child of course I took Gullivers Travels literally although it was a satirical book. I would not mind reading it again. Just saw the movie recently with my grands.

    Carolyn

    Joan Pearson
    July 6, 2005 - 05:21 pm
    See, Carolyn read Gulliver when she was a child...and is now enjoying the Tales with grandbabies! What have I been missing?

    I think this is a good place to bring up another possibility - a project proposed by one of our participants several months ago. Is there any interest in beginning a discussion of Shakespeare's plays? In chronological order?
    The Comedy of Errors (1590), Titus Andronicus (1590), The Taming of the Shrew (1591), 2 Henry VI (1591), 3 Henry VI (1591), 1 Henry VI (1592), Richard III (1592), Love's Labour's Lost (1593), Two Gentlemen of Verona (1593), A Midsummer Night's Dream (1594), Romeo and Juliet (1595), Richard II (1595), King John (1596), The Merchant of Venice (1596), Henry IV Part 1(1597), The Merry Wives of Windsor (1597), Henry IV Part 2 (1598), As You Like It (1598), Henry V (1599), Much Ado About Nothing (1599), Julius Caesar (1599), Twelfth Night (1600), Hamlet (1601), Troilus and Cressida (1602), All's Well That Ends Well (1603), Measure For Measure (1604), Othello (1604), King Lear (1605), Macbeth (1605), Antony and Cleopatra (1606), Timon of Athens (1606), Pericles Prince of Tyre (1607), Coriolanus (1608), Cymbeline (1609), A Winter's Tale (1610), The Tempest (1611), Henry VIII (1613).

    We wouldn't do them all at once, and no one would have to commit to all of them if not interested in a particular play. We'd start with "Comedy of Errors ... Would YOU be interested in this? If so, I could add Comedy to the list of nominations in the heading...

    Barbara St. Aubrey
    July 6, 2005 - 10:32 pm
    I like the idea of doing Shakespeare but I would hate to have it in place of a great book - it would be nice as a going discussion with say two plays a year - a January play that could finish up in the Spring and a late Summer play that could finish up before the holidays.

    I can take Gulliver or leave him - I also read him when I was young and saw some great plays with fun changes here and there to the plot. A couple that I would like to read with a group because alone I may not get it would be Machiavelli "The Prince" - "The Way of All Flesh" Samuel Butler or "the Plague" by Albert Camus and one of these days I would love to read Balzac - I still remember Balzac as supposedly the no no of all authors in "Music Man."

    marni0308
    July 7, 2005 - 10:15 am
    I read Machiavelli's The Prince last summer because I had read so many references to it. I was disappointed that it wasn't more....shockingly and coldly cruel and cynical. Apparently, at the time it was written, it was. I read that we have become so accustomed to the ideas presented in his book that it doesn't have much of an impact today.

    Joan: All of Shakespeare's plays!! That's a big project. I took an entire year's course of Shakespeare in college to study all of his plays.

    If anyone is counting votes, I'd go for Don Quixote before Gulliver's Travels.

    Scrawler
    July 7, 2005 - 10:39 am
    My vote would be for Don Quixote. But I'd also like to suggest [if it is not to late] the following:

    "Victory" by Joseph Conrad

    "The Grapes of Wrath" by John Steinbeck

    "The Octopus" by Frank Norris

    Joan Pearson
    July 7, 2005 - 11:09 am
    hahaha, I'm sorry, Barbara...I'm laughing at the idea that you wouldn't want to do Shakespeare instead of a Great Book! I know what you mean though...it would be a great big project as Marni points out and you would like to do another of the Great Books as well as the first Shakespeare on the list, Comedy of Errors. First you want to do something else though...

    Will add your other suggestions later this afternoon when I have more time...Machiavelli "The Prince" - "The Way of All Flesh" Samuel Butler or "the Plague" by Albert Camus.

    Scrawler, we've done Grapes of Wrath in SeniorNet - see the teeny font in the heading? But will add Conrad's Victory and Frank Norris' Octopus to the heading later today when I have a bit more time. It is always surprising when the more recent titles work their way into our consideration. That has happened ever since we broadened the pool to include Harold Bloom's more recent list - Frank Norris is one of his picks.

    There's plenty of time to chat and consider - we're not voting until the end of the month.

    Marvelle
    July 7, 2005 - 11:38 am
    I like the idea of a Shakespeare discussion, separate from Great Books, and if we did only two a year we'd be finished in about 16 years.

    Sixteen years? Hmmmm, how about 6 plays a year so that we'd have one month per play with a month's break inbetween? Then we'd be done in 6 years which is still a considerable commitment but worth the time. I'd even be willing for a play a month, if the rest of you prefer, but am worried about burnout for all of us.

    .

    As for the next Great Books discussion, I'll wait before voting as I like both selections.

    Here's another idea about the Don. So many novelists have been inspired by this Great Book that it might be fun to first discuss Don Quijote and then the books that were inspired by it. I just finished reading the comic last novel of William Faulkner, The Reivers which definitely reminds me of Don Quijote. It may be the only comic writing of Faulkner but, like DQ, it is serious too.

    Marvelle

    Barbara St. Aubrey
    July 7, 2005 - 11:55 am
    hahahaha yes the insteads and the in addition to's - thanks for understanding...

    I hear you about getting all the plays done within - ahum - 'our lifetime' but burn out is the concern for me - with all the research we usually end up doing, to me, reading more than three plays a year would do me in unless, I was devoting a year or two exclusively to Shakespeare - and that would bore the Heck out of me...

    Now if we were simply reading the plays on our own with a blogging page of our impressions and insights - then I could see a two year program of what - 18 plays a year plus one...

    JoanK
    July 7, 2005 - 08:18 pm
    I like the idea of Shakespeare's plays. Just because we may not be able to do all, doesn't mean we can't do any. We could do one and see how it goes.

    I never thought much of the Comedy of Errors until I saw a BBC production. It's an absolute hoot when staged! But I don't know how much there is to discuss.

    marni0308
    July 7, 2005 - 08:33 pm
    Maybe, to pare it down, we could select several from the different types of plays Shakespeare wrote - for example: one tragedy, one comedy, and one of the history plays like Henry V or Richard III.

    Barbara St. Aubrey
    July 8, 2005 - 08:12 am
    Again I would prefer this be a separate discussion - now looking at the plays - we have done Othello and Julius Caesar - most of us have done Romeo and Juliet in high school and it was made into a successful movie - most of us are familiar with or have studied in school Macbeth and Hamlet - both plays have been discussed by nearly every serious actor and producer.

    Of the Tragedies - although we hear about and many of us have seen various versions of King Lear the ones we have seldom heard about are Titus Andronicus, Timon of Athens, Antony and Cleopatra, Coriolanus - I'm for one or two of these of the Tragedies...

    Then what is amazing few of the comedies are discussed in English Lit in either high school or collage. I didn't realize till I looked it up there are more Comedies than Tragedies or Historical plays.

    Lots of links on the internet but I thought this one was pretty good Shakespeare Plays

    I'm for three plays a year for two years - so that we can have two Comedies and two...so forth...I just do not think I could delve into more than three of Shakespeare's plays a year. We are talking here about one of, if not the greatest wordsmith as well as, story tellers and his ability to understand and portray humanity within the western cannon.

    Some of these plays have been made into successful movies - I have mixed emotions - it is nice for those of us who are not able to see these plays to see a production but my thought is there is a vast difference in what can be accomplished on a movie set as compared to a stage. And so I wonder if choosing those plays that have not been made into a movie would give us an opportunity for our own fresh discovery of the Bard.

    marni0308
    July 8, 2005 - 11:14 am
    Barbara: I was told that tragedies are selected rather than comedies for school because they are supposed to be easier to understand. The comedies have much more Elizabethan humor, innuendoes, and jokes which are difficult for current generations to understand. The stories of the tragedies can grab a less...intellectual?...sophisticated?...audience more easily than those of the comedies.

    I remember in high school, studying and discussing what was for many their first Shakespeare play (Macbeth), how so many kids in class HATED it. We did have to constantly refer to the footnotes for explanations. I think it takes a certain amount of exposure, experience to develop a taste for Shakespeare.

    Joan Pearson
    July 8, 2005 - 12:15 pm
    Lots of good ideas on how to handle the proposal to read ALL of the Bard - in chronological order. It would be quite interesting to read the plays as he wrote them to see the development and the impact of what was happening at the time on Shakespeare's choice of subject matter, wouldn't it?

    I've seem more of the comedies read and staged in schools now than when we were young. "Midsummer Night's Dream", "Tempest", "Taming of the Shrew" come to mind.

    To face facts, blogging is not an option on SeniorNet - (all of our Discussions require a DL) and to do twelve a year would tie up a DL to discussing nothing else but Shakespeare. Even if we pull in several DLs to split the load, do we have the readership to read only Shakespeare?

    The only thing I can think of doing right now, in this discussion is to put up "Comedy of Errors" on the list of nominations to see if there is interest in the first play when the time comes to vote.

    By the way, the links in the table in the heading are "hot" - meaning "live" and will take you to Barnes & Noble if you wish to read more on a title.

    Some really good ideas, folks!

    Scrawler
    July 9, 2005 - 09:09 am
    This is not a Great Book but it is an interesting read about William Shakespeare. "Ruled Britannia" written by Harry Turtledove is an alternate history. Read what the jacket cover says and judge for yourself:

    "The year is 1507. For nearly a decade, the island of Britain has been under the rule of King Philip in the name of Spain. The citizenry live under an enforced curfew - and in fear of the Inquistion's agents, who put heretics to the torch in public displays. And with Queen Elizabeth imprisoned in the Tower of London, the British have no symbol to unite them against the enemy who occupies their land.

    William Shakespeare has no interest in politics. His passion is writing for the theatre, where his words bring laughter and tears to a populace afraid to speak out against the tyranny of the Spanish crown. But now Shakespeare is given an opportunity to pen his greatest work - a drama that will incite the people of Britain to rise against their persecutors - and change the course of history..."

    Of course, I am not suggesting that this book be read as a Great Book, but with your discussion of Shakespeare you reminded me of the book and it is a good read.

    Marvelle
    July 9, 2005 - 04:10 pm
    Joan P., it would be exciting to read Shakespeare's plays in the order they were written. Then we wouldn't have leeeeeeengthy discussions about what to read next and lots of vote-taking and lots and lots and lots of unnecessary rules.

    We could bypass all that by taking things in chrono order or just having the DL choose. Individually, we wouldn't need to commit to participating in each Shakespeare discussion; just whatever and whenever we choose.

    A play could be discussed for 3 weeks and then time off for 5 weeks; then another play - this would mean that we absolutely could not get overly excited and start adding extra things into the mix.

    I won't push for a discussion on Shakespeare, however, as there must be such a discussion already going on somewhere on the internet. I'll check it out.

    Marvelle

    Joan Pearson
    July 11, 2005 - 07:46 am
    I've spoken to Georgianna Zigler, Head of Reference at the Folger Shakespeare Library in DC...who made a number of helpful suggestions. She mentioned something that may be of interest to those who are interested in reading all of the plays. From Georgianna:
    "Note from the British paper The Guardian today - the Royal Shakespeare Company is coordinating a number of companies from around the world to perform the whole cycle of plays and the poems from April 2006. Leading actors who have signed on to this project include Judi Dench, Ian McKellen, and Patrick Stewart." (I love all three of these actors!)
    I knew that Washington DC has designated 2007 as the Year of the Bard...probably because it is the Folger's 75th anniversary. All of the Shakespearean theaters in the metro area - all of the theaters including the Kennedy Center are taking part in the year long project.

    I would love to coordinate with the Royal Shakespeare Company (I know they are coming to DC) to make SeniorNet Books a part of this.

    Will check further and let you know. Let's put off any decisions until we see where this goes? And for September, concentrate on some of the other excellant suggestions you have already made. Would love to add to this list...

    Scrawler, "Ruled Britannia" is something I'd like to read. Have you read Stephen Greenblatt's "Will in the World"...on how Shakespeare became Shakespeare? When/If we do a big Shakespeare project, maybe we could have simultaneous NonFiction discussions going on books such as these for those who prefer history to fiction.

    marni0308
    July 11, 2005 - 08:03 am
    Someone suggested I read Guns, Germs, and Steel by Jared Diamond. I don't remember who suggested it. But I noticed that something about it is going to be on public TV tonight at 10:00 p.m. EST (CPTV in Connecticut.)

    Amazon blurb about the book: "Explaining what William McNeill called The Rise of the West has become the central problem in the study of global history. In Guns, Germs, and Steel Jared Diamond presents the biologist's answer: geography, demography, and ecological happenstance. Diamond evenhandedly reviews human history on every continent since the Ice Age at a rate that emphasizes only the broadest movements of peoples and ideas. Yet his survey is binocular: one eye has the rather distant vision of the evolutionary biologist, while the other eye--and his heart--belongs to the people of New Guinea, where he has done field work for more than 30 years."

    Traude S
    July 11, 2005 - 10:11 am
    MARNI, yes, the PBS program was mentioned in the SoC folder and I checked the local schedule at once. It is NOT listed at WGBH channels 2 and 44 in Boston, nor Channel 36 in Rhode Island. But I'll investigate further. I read Jared Diamond's book and don't want to miss the PBS program.

    JOAN, I won't be able to commit to an all Shakespeare project.

    We have great nominations!
    I read Gulliver's Travels as a child, in German, and was enchanted by the tiny "Lilliputaner" (Lillputians) and the giants eleven times bigger than humans. Then there was the country of the Houyhnhnms (I think) ad Yahoos. I don't remember which of them were horse-like, smelled and went naked. Children in their blessed innocence know nothing about satire and will always take these fantastic stories at face value and huge fun.

    Many years later I read it again (it was an ssignment) and discovered that Swift was dead serious and meant to point out all kinds of egregious (perhaps incorrigible) flaws, like pettiness and the abuse of power and reason.

    Niccolò Machiavelli's The Prince , "Il Principe" in Italian, was required reading when I studied in Italy. Machiavelli wrote it as a treatise for the Medicis in Florence, and his supreme models of how to exercise power (ruthlessly, single-mindedly, consistently) were the infamous Borgias in Rome.

    I read Joseph Conrad's The Heart of Darkness several times, but never his Victory .

    Last night I checked the sources given in the header again, first Mortimer Adler"s Great Stories of the Western World . Listed there is (only) one book by Balzac, and it is "Cousin Bette" (sic).

    That should be either "Cousin Betty" (rendered in English) or, properly, "La Cousine Bette" (lE cousin, lA cousine) -- admittedly a minor point.

    But more important is the fact that "La Cousine Bette" is only one part of a much larger body of work, collectively known as "La Comédie Humaine" = the Human Comedy". It is Balzac's masterwork, he took twenty years to write it and died before finishing it at age 50. "Eugénie Grandet" and "Le Père Goriot" are two other notable novels that are part of the "Human Comedy" cycle.

    Balzac wrote more than 90 (ninety !) books in his lifetime, aiming for breadth rather than depth, with memorable boldly-drawn characters, their passions and romances. Given his literary fame in Europe, it is surprising to me that only one novel, part of a much larger whole at that, i.e. "La Cousine Bette", made it into Mortimer Adler's list.

    I am much taken with Harold Bloom's "The Western Canon" and the excellent categorizations.
    To my delight I found there a reference to Marguerite Duras . She was born in 1914 in what was then Indochina. At age 17 she went to live in France, became a novelist, a resistancw fighter and more, and also wrote film scripts, most famously for "Hiroshima Mon Amour" for Alain Resnais. I saw the film in Washington years ago and dimly remember that it was the French version with Englsh subtitles.

    In 1984 Duras published "L'Amant" = "The Lover", a semi-autobiographical novel which brought her major attention in this country too. She was 70 at the time. She died in 1996.

    This is not a formal nomination, mind you, only an expression of gratitude to Harold Bloom for (deservedly) including her in "The Western Canon".

    Joan Pearson
    July 11, 2005 - 12:14 pm
    Will put Cousin Bette into the heading...thanks Traudee. Barbara suggested the author, now you came up with the title. Quite efficient.

    I'm sure that we will see more in Gulliver's Travels than we would have (or did see) when we were younger.

    Bloom's Western Canon is quite comprehensive and well organized, isn't it? He lists more recent titles than Mortimer Adler. This is why we like to keep these links in the heading.

    Marni, will you post your suggestion in Suggest a Book for Discussion? It sounds like a great book, just not one of the Great Books we are considering here. We don't want to lose "young" Jared Diamond down here among the old timers!

    ps. Traudee, no one is asking you or anyone else to commit to the entire Shakespeare project. I thought that was made clear from the onset. You'd pick and choose that which interests you...but no, not commit to all of the plays. By the same token, we would ask for Discussion Leaders only when there is expressed interest among the participants to move on to the next...

    KleoP
    July 11, 2005 - 01:31 pm
    'Bette' is an acceptable English variation in spelling of the name 'Betty.' It was the more common form in my area when I was a child. Or is there some other reason that it should be 'Betty' in the title? I have not read the book.

    Marguerite Duras was also a director, adored by the pop art culture of the 60s and 70s and by John Waters.

    Kleo

    KleoP
    July 11, 2005 - 02:39 pm
    Diamond's latest book is Collapse, published last year. Guns, Germs and Steel has been a book club choice in a number of places on the web. I read it with my face-to-face book club a couple of years ago.

    How does Bloom justify his choices for his Western Canon in his book? Has anyone read his book, not just the list? He has some funny choices and omissions, it seems to me, in the more modern list. He does point out his lesser confidence in this list than in the prior lists.

    Kleo

    Hats
    July 12, 2005 - 05:08 am
    Hi Joan and Maryal,

    May I nominate "David Copperfield?"

    Joan Pearson
    July 12, 2005 - 07:18 am
    Hats! Of course you may! Your nominations are always very welcome here. I remember that we did Dicken's "Hard Times" here in the Books - quite a while ago - 1998! It was a very popular choice back then. I'm curious - are you nominating "David Copperfield" because it is a personal favorite - or because it is something that you would like to reread after so many years? I've seen the filmed version a number of times - but would like to read Dicken's own words again. I'm sure there is a lot I missed the first time I read it (and forgot)...and a lot that went to the editing room floor when the film was made.

    Kleo, you are not alone in questioning some of Harold Bloom's choices. Yale's "Sterling" Professor is revered by many in literary, educational and publishing circles, but controversial too. You might enjoy this article, although there are many out there...Bloom's Embattled Western Canon

    We do consider him a good source of suggestions here in the Books, but have never voted in any of the really questionable choices. Somewhere in his book, he also includes a list of his predictions for FUTURE GREAT BOOKS. Perhaps it is that list of titles at the heart of the controversy? Not sure.

    Hats
    July 12, 2005 - 07:23 am
    Joan, I have begun reading "The Little Curiosity Shop." I am enjoying it so much. I would love to read more Dickens. I am finding it easier to pick up than Faulkner.

    I could not decide between Pickwick Papers or David Copperfield. I have heard that Pickwick is very comical.

    Hats
    July 12, 2005 - 07:25 am
    Oh, I have never read "David Copperfield" or "Pickwick." At the moment, Little Nell is tearing at my heartstrings.

    Marvelle
    July 12, 2005 - 04:07 pm
    Kleo, in the past the Western Canon had great holes in the list because the majority of literature considered for it were by white males while women and minorities given token nods if that.

    Bloom has been attacked by the new academics for his traditional choices for the Western Canon - Shakespeare, Cervantes etc and in his revised list he tried to be more "inclusive".

    The attempt isn't completely successful in my opinion because the new academics are counting beans (how many women and minorities are listed) rather than judging on merits and which merely continues the same biased scenario for the Great White Male Books in the older canons. Bloom couldn't please them anyway. Hope he'll revise the list once again and select on merit.

    I'm surprised at Marguerite Duras's choice (sorry Traude) and there are others.

    Which choices disappointed you?

    Marvelle

    Scrawler
    July 15, 2005 - 10:23 am
    I watched Mark Twain's biography on PBS last night and during the program they mentioned several of his books, but one that caught my eye was: "Following the Equator: A Journey Around the World". I'm not sure this would qualify as a "Great Book" but I thought since its late summer and early fall when we'll be reading and people have traveled during this time we could get a glimpse of what it would have been like to travel around the world in 1897.

    Here is an editorial review: "Great writer's 1897 account of circumnavigating the globe by steamship. Brimming with ironic, tongue-in-cheek humor, the book describes shark fishing in Australia, riding the rails in India, tiger hunting, diamond mining in South Africa, and much more about peoples, climate, flora and fauna, customs, religion, politics, food etc." Travel classic

    KleoP
    July 16, 2005 - 12:57 pm
    Thanks, Joan, I'll look it over.

    There are a few surprises. For one thing, Bloom doesn't mention Polish author Henryk Sienkiewicz, a strange omission when one is naming just a handful of authors of Polish literature. Even stranger when each of the Polish authors named and many of the other 20th century writers would name Sienkiewicz first if asked about great Polish literature or great books in general.

    Barabbas is a great book, but it is simply Lagerkvist's most popular and best known. He has other stories that will stand the test of time for more powerful reasons than this one has, namely the author's ability to put into words the political direction of the collective human soul towards its shattering on the floor of the abyss of mid-twentieth century totalitarian madness in stories like The Hangman or The Dwarf.

    He omits Spaniards that other Spaniards would omit or add simply for political reasons, while no outsider judging solely for literary merit would have any trouble placing them or their works properly. Spain is a microcosm of Western Civilization. I'm thinking particularly of Jose Maria Gironella's The Cypresses Believe in God, one of the most powerful books ever written about the relationship between family and war and loyalty and national and religious identity and the aforementioned madness of the twentieth century.

    His I. B. Singer choices seem fairly standard, best-sellers, ignoring some of Singer's best, most unusual and probably his most enduring contributions to Western Literature, The Magician of Lublin, Enemies, a Love Story, and The Golem should all be listed before Satan in Goray, my favorite Singer most of the time. I imagine that most 'literary experts' asked to pick a single Singer to represent the 20th century, they would pick The Magician of Lublin, a deceptively simple philosophical work that captures what the world lost. It looks, like with the Lagerkvist, that Bloom picked an author and just went for the best sellers from him. It's hard to credit Bloom's knowledge of Singer when he ignores Magician--in this case one of Singer's better known books, and a best seller.

    Did he just ignore Science Fiction entirely? It's a little strange to ignore the amazing quest for the final frontier that actually created Western Civilization when talking about the Western Canon.

    I think that writing a Western Canon must be difficult. But if one presumes they are capable of doing so, and foists it on the public, the result should be the proof of proficiency. Probably Bloom should have stuck with English-language literature, or that plus French.

    On the other hand, he does mention a couple of authors that I don't know or haven't read and will be ordering from bookstores or libraries this summer. So, it ain't all bad.

    Kleo

    KleoP
    July 16, 2005 - 01:01 pm
    Mark Twain's travel writings are amongst my favorite books of all time. The man was a master of satire. Here's a line from the first page of Equator: "Ours was a reasonably comfortable ship, with the customary sea-going fare--plenty of good food furnished by the Deity and cooked by the devil."

    At least Bloom acknowledged there are Poles and Swedes contributing to the Western Canon.

    Kleo

    Joan Pearson
    July 16, 2005 - 03:54 pm
    Scrawler, I missed the Twain program on PBS! I'm quite sure that the "Journey Around the World" chronicles the same voyage he documents in Innocents Abroad. Do you remember a year or so ago we discussed his Puddn'head Wilson? You were with us for that adventure.

    I remember reading Innocents while we were discussing Puddn'head. Do you remember we had folks from the Mark Twain House in Hartford, Conn. as our guests? They were most helpful. Here's something Rachel Rogers from the MT House posted in the discussion:
    "For Innocents Abroad: Sam was commissioned by San Francisco's Alta California newspaper to take the voyage aboard the Quaker City and write letters about what he saw during his travels. The letters were published in California but also syndicated in other parts of the country. So popular were these letters that a Hartford publisher invited him to Hartford to discuss a book contract - built from the "Alta Letters." This embroiled Sam into a copyright battle with the newspaper, and the publishing company to get the rights. In the end, he rewrote the contents of the letters into the chapters that became Innocents Abroad. For the original letters visit: twainquotes.com, follow the directions to Newspaper Articles and see "San Francisco, Alta California."
    I remember envying him his job. He got paid for this trip around the world! And the things he saw! He was careful not to let the others aboard the ship know who he was and that he was writing a book about his fellow travellers!

    Kleo, am glad you are enjoying the Bloom list...and have found some 'books on the list of interest. Do you see anything you'd like to nominate for discussion here?

    marni0308
    July 16, 2005 - 06:17 pm
    I live in Windsor, the town just north of Hartford, and luckily have been able to visit Twain's amazing house a number of times. Twain lived in Hartford for many years and thought it was the most beautiful city in America. Would he be shocked to see how generations in the 20th century ruined his city.

    Joan Pearson
    July 17, 2005 - 02:23 pm
    Oh dear, what has happened to Harford, Marni? The same growth/development in most large cities, I suppose. It's been years since I've been there. Husband is from Conn.

    What I find interesting about Mark Twain - he wrote Tom Sawyer, Huckleberry Finn and other great stories of the Mississippi while living in Hartford or summering in NY. Wrote them from childhood memories. I don't know why, but I was disappointed in the same way I was sorry to learn that Willa Cather wrote "My Antonia" from beyond her beloved prairie.

    KleoP
    July 17, 2005 - 02:59 pm
    Well, there are some interesting books already. I think that I, in general, like a darker and more deeply philosophical sort of literature than most folks on SeniorNet.

    I'm interested in Charles Robert Maturin's Gothic novel, Melmoth the Wanderer. It is, however, based on racist propaganda. I'm not certain that this is the audience to digest this work with--a difficult task with any audience.

    Also I might like to tackle the Five Books of the Lives, Heroic Deeds and Sayings of Gargantua and Pantagruel, the latest translation of Rabelais' "monumental" work, although maybe just Pantagruel. I'm interested in this because, although I've heard of Pantagruel, I've never read it and never connected it to Gargantua the name of a cartoon character from the 70s with special family significance.

    I just got a copy of Brecht's Mother Courage and Her Children--it would be topical, but might be difficult because of this topicality.

    I've also never read Freud, just bits and pieces, although I criticize him generally as a quack. It might be interesting to get really into what he said and see if my quack theory holds up.

    One book on most of the Western Canon literary lists is George Eliot's Middlemarch. I really don't agree that it is her best work. It is, however, my favorite. It's one of my all-time favorite books, yet I've only read it once. It could stand a reread.

    I would enjoy discussing Hume's An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Isn't he the originator of the now popular catch-phrase "they stood on the shoulders of giants?"

    Don't post any of these yet to vote on. I would like some feed back from others in here about the possibility of reading philosophy. Is anyone interested in the least bit?

    I love Dickens and Swift and Camus and Conrad and could really read any of the books already chosen over any I would offer for vote. The only possible consideration being that if there were folks interested in philosophy I would give the lists a more thorough perusing to pick a tome from that genre.

    As for Shakespeare, one thing mentioned when first bringing it up is trying for an act a week. To me this makes reading through Shakespeare seem much less daunting. Although I read about half a dozen pieces of fiction each month, adding a book a month seems like more work than adding an act of a play each week. The other thing about the Shakespeare is that it would be nice to consider some flexibility in how things are done at SeniorNet. For example, putting the burden for discussion questions onto participants instead of Discussion Leaders. This would make it a true group exploration, and remove part of the work from being the DL. I think that all of the work of the DL is useful, but generally with the web and books folks can come up with biography and background just by using a few minutes of time and a search engine.

    Kleo

    marni0308
    July 17, 2005 - 07:27 pm
    Joan: The growth and development of Hartford did have a terrible impact, not that Hartford was ever a large city. It's very small. But, some cities made better decisions about growth and development than others. Something terrible happened in Hartford. The decisions of those in power were terrible. So many lovely homes were torn down, not to be replaced with beautiful buildings, but with parking lots. I have never seen so many parking lots. And the Park River, which meandered by Twain's house and by the state Capitol building, was covered over because it flooded. It was replaced by highways. Decisions were made to build several huge highways right through the small city, including I-91 which was built right in front of the Connecticut River, one of the most beautiful rivers in the country. I-91 separates the city from the river now. Several interesting business buildings were constructed, but most are just your run-of-the-mill ugly concrete square types. You just have to wonder: Just what were people thinking???

    horselover
    July 17, 2005 - 11:20 pm
    I'd like to vote for Tolstoy's "War and Peace" or Fitzgerald's "The Great Gatsby."

    Joan Pearson
    July 18, 2005 - 06:02 am
    My my, Horselover, you've just made the selection process even harder! Will add War and Peace and Great Gatsby to the slate above. We'll have to have a prelinary vote, a primary, to narrow the list. No matter which we choose, we can't go wrong. No matter which we choose, some excellent works will be left behind. Oh well, there's always next time!

    Kleo, are you sure you don't want to nominate Middlemarch to the list of possibilities? It sounds good to me. Let's see how Shakespeare's play does in the nomination process. Otherwise we'll hold off on the whole project until a future date. Yes, an act a week sounds good. Each play is made up of five acts (most of them) = five weeks. But remember, in Great Books we are not bound by any month-long discussion boundaries. (We took nearly a year to do the Odyssey!)

    And we ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS welcome questions from participants. ALWAYS. In ALL of our discussions. I hope everyone knows that. (And you are so right, Kleo, it does make the DL's job easier.)

    Marni, from what you describe of Hartford, yes, Mark Twain would be heartsick. Are there any signs of renewal or hope? Surely others must feel as you do. Parking lots can be built upon...but the old buildings can never replaced! I understand Newark (NJ) is undergoing change...who would have thought that would EVER happen!

    ALF
    July 18, 2005 - 06:06 am
    Poor old Don Quixote has been sitting on his horse for the last three offerings, hasn't he Poncho?

    marni0308
    July 18, 2005 - 01:19 pm
    Joan: Hartford keeps trying...building conference centers, civic centers, etc. Nothing is working. They don't have a thriving middle-class living in the city - they're all in the suburbs. I think it makes a big difference.

    Barbara St. Aubrey
    July 18, 2005 - 04:19 pm
    My word - quite a list from which we are choosing...!

    Traude S
    July 18, 2005 - 06:11 pm
    JOAN, if we didn't already have a book by Joseph Conrad on the list, I'd suggest The Heart of Darkness .

    But the question may be, how far into darkness do we want to descend? We've been to the Inferno with Dante, where flames were licking at the feet of some miscreants and horrible punishment lay in store for other misbegotten sinners in the various treacherous circles of Hell.

    We know that, simply put, there'll always be good people and bad, hyprocrites, saints and sinners; human nature is unchanged, amply described through the ages with wit, satire, even cynicism.

    In this extremely hot summer, windmills are very much the subject du jour in these parts, and that's why I'd like to throw my hat into the ring, standing right next to ALF, in favor of the historical outlook. In fairness, the historical outlook would also include Balzac's Cousin Bette. Just MHO.

    bluebird24
    July 21, 2005 - 09:18 pm

    Joan Pearson
    July 22, 2005 - 05:44 am
    Bluebird, yes, a good point. The neat thing about some of the electronic texts is that they are searchable. Last month we found that to be so when reading/discussing Shaw's Pygmalion. I remember finding such a feature particularly helpful when we need Canterbury Tales several years ago...even though I had my own marked up copy at my fingertips. Nothing like searchable text in finding that elusive passage...

    The good thing about the Great Books ...they are readily available in your local library - usually not a waiting list for them.

    We are nearing the end of the nomination process. Barbara's right - quite a selection ahead of us. Next week, we'll have a "primary" to narrow the field to where there is most interest. I'm looking forward to that.

    But in the meantime, there is still time to nominate. Sometimes a last minute entry captures the collective imagination. Let's see if that happens this time!

    KleoP
    July 22, 2005 - 08:21 pm
    Oh, I'm going to nominate Middlemarch. It is a brilliant political book written by a woman of an era when women weren't thought to have the brains for politics. I've read it for enjoyment. Maybe it's time to read it to appreciate Eliot's brilliance in writing it.

    Plus, fact of the matter, it remains one of the best reads of all time. Literate, entertaining, educational.

    Kleo

    bluebird24
    July 22, 2005 - 08:28 pm
    there are many I can pick for the list:) when is the last day?

    Joan Pearson
    July 22, 2005 - 09:15 pm
    OK, Kleo, the highly recommended Middlemarch is up in the heading. Thank you.

    Bluebird, we'll continue to accept nominations unti August 1, at which time we'll have a preliminary vote to narrow the list. It's always fun to guess what the next selection will be!

    kiwi lady
    July 24, 2005 - 11:57 am
    I vote for Middlemarch too. However Gullivers Travels would be my second choice.

    Regarding Shakespeare. To be frank I don't think doing all of Shakespeares plays would be a good idea. We would get Shakespearitis after a while.

    Why not choose half a dozen plays and go with three a year. That would be two years. Much as Shakespeare is revered you can have too much of him!

    Carolyn

    marni0308
    July 24, 2005 - 09:52 pm
    I just browsed through the list. I'm curious why none of the lists contains anything by Alexandre Dumas pere. The Three Musketeers, for example, is such a wonderful classic comedy. It's obviously enjoyed immensely because it's been made into a movie at least 3 times - probably more.

    Joan Pearson
    July 25, 2005 - 03:59 am
    We'll do a preliminary vote next Monday - will send you each a note. Only votes posted then will be counted.

    Marni, an interesting question. Any ideas? Perhaps Dumas is/was regarded as a popular writer...He certainly was influential in the development of the French novel, but there must be a reason he is not included in anyone's list...

    Kevin Freeman
    July 25, 2005 - 06:50 am
    Well shoot, marni, The Three Musketeers is on the list as soon as you officially say "I officially nominate The Three Musketeers -- Bobby, Annette, and Cubby."

    Over in the RAW thread I admitted that I cannot resist being able to nominate things. Heck, just this morning I nominated the salt shaker on my kitchen counter. It looked honored, but confused.

    Anyway, I'd like to nominate more Russians because the Golden Age of Russian Writing dwarves all the other Snow White Literary Eras of the World (that's my opinion and I'm sticking with it).

    Has this august (well, july at the moment) group done Fathers and Sons by Ivan Turgenev or the little-known but highly-influential A Hero of Our Time by Mikhail Lermontov?

    Are we supposed to provide links if we nominate something? Where are the Roberts Rules of Order? All at the Senate Confirmation Hearings for Supreme Court Injustices?

    Joan Pearson
    July 25, 2005 - 09:27 am
    Kevin, I suppose you'd call this a september group, rather than august as that will be our start date this time around. Your questions:
    *The books we've discussed to date are in the heading of this discussion.

  • The rules? Hmmm...there's one that I can think of. The nominated title must be found in one of the three lists of Great Books to be found in the header of this discussion. We had to adopt this policy years ago...rather than subjectively decide (and argue) about what makes a great book a "Great Book. "These lists are the ones Marni is talking about when she notes the absence of Dumas Père.
  • Kevin Freeman
    July 25, 2005 - 10:09 am
    I see... incredible that Dumas would be excluded, esp. considering that you can find such dreck as James Feniless Cooper's The Deerslayer. Must be that there was a Canon Snob Cabal meeting and it was determined that Dumas would be excluded like some National Enquirer broadsheet writer. Plus de pitie, as they say in some parts (yet determined) of France.

    I see that both Turgenev's Fathers & Sons and Lermontov's A Hero of Our Time are on the Bloomin' list written by Harold. As they know the password, do they get in the door? If it's only one nominee allowed per poster, put the titles on a dartboard and give the dart a heave (10 paces back, now!).

    Barbara St. Aubrey
    July 25, 2005 - 11:18 am
    Well if you remember the French only re-buried Dumas in the Panthéon of Paris along side fellow author Victor Hugo and Nobel Prize-winning physicist Marie Curie in 2002.

    It was Jacques Chirac who ordered the transfer of Dumas' remains from a cemetery in the town of Villers-Cotterets. How many of you knew that Dumas was a Blackman - Alexandre Dumas I wonder if he is the first Black author to achieve fame in the western world?

    From everything I read and hear it is his "The Count of Monte Cristo" that is getting the current run with several new translations having been published including one paperback with all sorts of background material - sounds like a book for us to consider in the fall but not in either the Great Books or the Reading Around the World discussions.

    If you have an interst in reading Dumas post something in the Cafe - or whatever it is called these days - I know I would be game for "The Count..."

    KleoP
    July 25, 2005 - 12:19 pm
    Alexander Dumas was 1/4 black (making him technically more white than black) and subjected to much racism during his life due to this--and after his death. His grandmother was a Haitian slave. His father was an general in the French army--my sister studied him when we were teens, as Dumas was her favorite author. There was something rather interesting about his father that we discussed as teens that I hoped to find with a quick look on the web. No such luck:

    Dumas at Wikipedia

    Dumas's ancestry probably impacted the French look at his literary contribution for a long time. Another factor about Dumas is that he was very successful as an author during his time. The most commercially accepted authors are sometimes looked down upon by the literary elite, ditto Dickens and Tolstoy in their countries.

    The Count of Monte Cristo may not be on the so called 'Western Canons.' However, it is generally the first or second book read in French by most Westerners learning French as a second language. Canons should be about cultural contributions, not literary rankings, because it is the history of the arts in a culture, not the ranking. Dumas took French literature to the masses, not just the French masses.

    Kleo

    Kevin Freeman
    July 25, 2005 - 06:40 pm
    Yes, let us boy and girlcott Harold Bloom, Mortimer Adler, and Encyclo P. Brittanica until they right their respective wrongs and stop acting like dum as-es.

    Thank you, Sysop, for putting Mikhail Lermontov's A Hero of Our Time in the line-up. I'm warning all other contestants that my nominees have an incredible track record* so look out!

    * ... of garnering one to two votes.

    marni0308
    July 25, 2005 - 09:49 pm
    I think I went hunting for Dumas on the lists because recently I found out that not only was he a black writer but he wrote a number of historical novels. He wrote so many popular novels that were made into movies. Even The Man in the Iron Mask. This winter I read Queen Margot, a fun and fascinating historical novel about Henry III of Navarre, who married Marguerite de Valois, daughter of Henry II of France and Catherine de Medici, and who became eventually Henry IV of France, first Bourbon king. (Navarre was a Huegenot in Catholic France during the era of the St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre and his mother-in-law dealt in intrigue and poisons.)

    After I saw the wonderful film The Three Musketeers (1974 version directed by Richard Lester), I had to read the book. The movie was exactly like the book - the humor was just the same. It was a really fun book.

    Dumas' father was the illegitimate son of a marquis and was one of Napoleon's generals.

    In reading about Dumas, I have not found that he had trouble with racism, but the opposite. It seems he was accepted personally and he was France's most popular writer of his time.

    Joan Pearson
    July 26, 2005 - 06:05 am
    Marni, will you please post this same enthusiastic review in our Suggest a Book Discussion in the Book Nook? As you say, The Three Musketeers sounds like fun reading!

    Traude S
    July 26, 2005 - 10:02 am
    The author of "The Three Musketeers"(1802-1870) is known as Dumas père . His natural son, also named Alexandre, also an author, is known as Dumas fils, or Dumas the younger.

    In addition to TTM Dumas père also wrote "The Black Tulip", a historical romance set in Holland. His third novel, "The Viscount of Bragelonne" (Le Vicomte de Bragelonne), is set in the reign of Louis XIV. That novel and Dumas' fourth, "Twenty Years After" (Vingt ans après), are sequels to "The Thee Musketeers".

    Dumas père is noted also for his plays "Henri III et sa cour" (Henry III and his court), "Napoléon Bonaparte", "Antony" and "La tour de Nesle".

    Critics have pointed to the excessive melodrama of Dumas' work, his lack of psychological perception; some have lamented his "careless style", but the color and drama of his novels insure their continued popularity.

    Dumas fils, 1824-1895, became an extremely popular playwright during the Second Empire. In technique his plays were realistic, his subjects the moral and social problems, the adulterous intrigues and financial scandals of the upper social classes. His most successful works are "La Dame aux Camélias" (Camille), "Le demi-monde" and "Un père prodigue".

    Traude S
    July 26, 2005 - 10:22 am
    KEVIN, I applaud your nomination of Mikhail Yurievich Lermontov.

    His work reflects the influence of Byronic romanticism on Russian literature. His reputation as a poet in the 19th century was exceeded only by Pushkin's. Both died under similar circumstances.
    Lermontov's most famous poems are Angel, Demon, Mtsyri (The Novice) and Zaveshchaniye (The Testament).
    Lermontov's only completed novel,"A Hero of our Time", was important in the development of the Russian novel in that it shows the transition from the earlier form of a cycle of stories to the new novel form of the later 19th century.

    bluebird24
    July 26, 2005 - 08:42 pm
    Dr Jekyll and Mr. Hyde Cape Cod

    KleoP
    July 26, 2005 - 08:44 pm
    Marni--

    Racism was an everyday fact of life for Dumas, no matter what he attained. It's not really ever been in question, whether or not he suffered from racist attitudes during his lifetime. The French don't deny this in the least bit, in fact, they make note of it with shame to make proper amends to the man for what he suffered in France because his grandmother was black.

    However, this is one of the problems, in my opinion, of studying the biography of an author: should it be bigger than his/her works? Not in my opinion. Dumas wrote some rip-roaring good books that will be read for hundreds, if not thousands of years. He was an interesting man.

    Kleo

    Joan Pearson
    July 27, 2005 - 03:31 am
    Marni, thanks for posting the suggestion for a Dumas read - there seems to be interest in his Queen Margot - you'll find it in bookstores under its French title, La Reine Margot - though it is written in English. I'm wondering at the differing impressions on the matter of his mixed race - I too thought he was quite popular among the French during his life time. Do you suppose he suffered in his personal life because his father was the illegtimate son of a marquis and a black woman, Kleo?

    Bluebird, I've added Dr Jekyll and Mr. Hyde along with Turgenev's Fathers and Sons and Lermontov's A Hero in our Time to our growing list of nominations for the preliminary race beginning Monday - This will probably narrow the field considerably. Be thinking of your top TWO choices.

    Kevin Freeman
    July 27, 2005 - 04:03 am
    Thank you, Traude, for remembering ole Lermontov. When people think of the Golden Age of Russian Lit., he is often forgotten, which is an injustice.

    With the addition of Dr.Jekyll & Mr. Hyde, this ballot will look like an Italian presidential ballot -- 16 contenders! Did you know that scientific evidence shows that people, despite assuring you that they love "choice," prefer to choose between 2 or 3 items more than choosing between 15 or 16? In fact, you're more likely to make a sale if you allow a prospective customer to sample from a table of a few items vs. many.

    Also, when a list is long, the first contender benefits from customers and voters who are either impatient or frustrated by the large number of choices. Being first on a presidential ballot has automatic benefits of a statistically-significant (in close races) number.

    That speaks well for COMEDY OF ERRORS in this case, though I agree with the poster who believes an ongoing thread (like the Durant one on Civilization) of Shakespeare plays would thrive. Of course it would. Comedy, Tragedy, Comedy, Tragedy. Kind of like a typical day in my life.

    Anyway, Joan, I'm intrigued by the parliamentary procedures here. The voting goes from Aug. 1st to Aug. ___??? And the Godzilla-like list is then whittled down to how many selections? And the runoff election occurs from Aug. ___ to Aug. ___??? And the actual book discussion begins on Sept. 1st, is it? I looked in the header (high and low) for this information but came up empty.

    Curios City, just outside of New York City, don't ya know.

    marni0308
    July 27, 2005 - 02:45 pm
    Re: "...customers and voters who are either impatient or frustrated by the large number of choices..."

    Boy, Kevin, you said it! Life seems to be getting more difficult as we have more and more choices. I find now that when I go grocery shopping, I get exhausted just looking at all the choices, trying to make up my mind. There 50 million selections of bread and every other thing. You can't just buy toothpaste. There are some with whitener, some with tartar control, some with this, some with that. Orange juice can have no pulp, little pulp, lots of pulp....Jeez Louise (as Rachel would say in The Poisonwood Bible which I just finished. SO GOOD.)

    Just take a look at the SeniorNet choices!!! My head is spinning there are so many great discussions going on!

    Marni

    Marvelle
    July 27, 2005 - 03:22 pm
    I think I've read everything by father and son. I read the unexpurgated version of "The Black Tulip" - most of the English editions are heavily edited - and was shocked at the beginning but it was an intriguing look at tulipomania in the Netherlands. Of course you can't go wrong (in my opinion) with any Dumas book. From Kirjasto:

    Dumas Pere

    From the link: "Dumas did not generally define himself as a black man, and there is not much evidence that he encountered overt racism during his life. However, his works were popular among the 19th-century African-Americans, partly because in The Count of Monte-Cristo, the falsely imprisoned Edmond Dantès, may be read as a parable of emancipation. In a shorter work, GEORGES (1843, George), Dumas examined the question of race and colonialism. The main character, a half-French mulatto, leaves Mauritius to be educated in France, and returns to avenge himself for the affronts he had suffered as a boy."

    From the same link about The Black Tulip: "In 1850 appeared The Black Tulip, a romantic adventure set in the 17th century Holland. In the middle of the political struggle for freedom is Cornelius van Baerle, a young man who has devoted himself to tulip-growing. Cornelius is falsely imprisoned for high treason. With the help of Rosa, the daughter of a jailer, he manages to grow a black tulip. Cornelius wins his freedom and hundred thousand guilders in glittering gold pieces as reward for the tulip. 'This tulip,' continued the Prince, 'will therefore bear the name of its producer, and figure in the catalogue under the title, Tulipa nigra Rosa Barlaensis, because of the name Van Baerle, which will henceforth be the name of this damsel'."

    Marvelle

    bluebird24
    July 27, 2005 - 09:10 pm
    know what books I will choose:)

    Kevin Freeman
    July 28, 2005 - 03:47 am
    Books in the plural?

    I wonder how many votes you get on the First of August. One? Two? Crazy Eight?

    I'll add that wonder to all the procedural wondering in my last post. Probably this is old shoe to most of you, so my apologies if such basic questions seem gnatty.

    AMICAH
    July 28, 2005 - 04:52 am
    Hello, I'm new to this, but I would really enjoy a discussion of Thomas Wolfe's Look Homeward Angel .This is my favorite book even though H. Bloom dismisses Wolfe. After all these years the novel is still in print so there must be other fans. AMICAH

    Joan Pearson
    July 28, 2005 - 09:06 am
    Oh yes, AMICAH, there are plenty of Wolfe fans out there...and Look Homeward Angel is indeed a classic. Only thing is...it's not included in the Canon of the Western World which are read in Great Books programs - from which we select our titles for discussion in this Great Books series. We just went through this with another classic author, Alexander Dumas. We DO discuss classics in SN...and you are invited to post this suggestion (or any other title) in our Suggest a Book Discussion to see if there are others interested in a discussion of this book.

    Marni posted on Alexander Dumas' work and there were some very interesting posts to follow. Interesting review of his The Black Tulip, Marvelle. Never knew you were such a fan. Would you copy that info into the Book Nook discussion please?

    And AMICAH, since you found us, we hope you will consider staying for a discussion of one of the books nominated here. Obviously they all can't "win"...but we will narrow the list beginning Monday. Bluebird was referring to a post here yesterday, Kevin- when she referred to s. You each will get to vote for your first AND second choices. Surprising how fast the list will narrow after that. If there is no clear winner after three days (this seldom happens) we will hold a runoff from the list of frontrunners. The goal is to select the title with the broadest interest. The hope is that many will participate in September, whether or not their fav has been selected next week.

    Marvelle
    July 28, 2005 - 03:11 pm
    I thought I had posted the Dumas info in Book Nook and not here in Great Books. Shows what happens when I rush around. Sorry I'll post the Dumas there.

    His books don't belong in the "Great" category but very nice all the same when you want a ripping read.

    Marvelle

    KleoP
    July 29, 2005 - 02:32 pm
    Joan--

    You mention "The Canon of the Western World," but this is not one of the three choices above. The way it is worded above, I thought the book just had to be on one of the Western Canons, and that you had posted 3 such examples, not that these 3 posted are the only ones the book can come from. There are others--some better accepted, in my opinion, than Bloom's.

    Please clarify? It has to be a book on one of only these 3 Western Canons? And by "Canon of the Western World" you mean Mortimer Adler's?

    Kleo

    Deems
    July 29, 2005 - 03:12 pm
    Kleo--this question about "the canon" comes up all the time. I think--Joan, correct me if I'm wrong--that Bloom didn't even used to be here and that there were only two to choose from.

    The problem with the whole idea of a canon is that someone is making choices (and lists) that are, in his or her opinion, the very best that one can read. Unfortunately, the list makers/ canon-establishers do not agree.

    The reason for the limitations above are simply to avoid having all sorts of arguments about whether or not X is a great book.

    Many of us have favorite books that we think belong on "the List."

    Let's say, for example, that my very favorite book of all time is Gone with the Wind. I look at all the lists and it isn't there. I am dismayed. I say to myself: Hey, who are these people making these lists anyway and who are they to judge?

    And so forth and so on.

    And yet, when push comes to shove, if you read both Three Musketeers and Les Miserables, it's hard to make an argument that they are on the same level.

    I just went and read some of Adler's choices (his list is much shorter than the other two). He picks only one Dickens' novel, Little Dorrit. I scratch my head in wonderment. What was he thinking, I say to myself. It is plain to me that Bleak House is better as well as David Copperfield and a couple of others.

    I hope the foregoing helps. The idea is to restrict us to some of the very best authors. And we understand that no one's list is perfect or even acceptable. The best minds in English literature simply do not agree.

    Also, note that we are only talking about the Western Canon here. Thank heaven. Things could be much worse.

    marni0308
    July 29, 2005 - 07:48 pm
    I'm not saying The Three Musketeers as one of the greatest pieces of literature of the world. I'm not in a position to know, by any means. But, it has caught such a huge audience for 175 years or so. What does that tell you? I wonder if comedies get a raw deal on the Greatest Books lists. I wonder what percent of the books there are comedies.

    Barbara St. Aubrey
    July 30, 2005 - 12:52 am
    marni - think and you can figure it out - comedy and tragedy are simply two mediums if you would for getting the message out - the message in a Great Book usually shapes or affects civilization - or brings into focus the human condition and the human spirit.

    For example, there are many Shakespeare comedies - some of Aesops Fables are comedies - the comedies of the Aristophanes - Fielding's Tom Jones - Steinbeck's Cannery Row - however, the great books seem to include books that are valued not so much just because the writer was a gifted wordsmith or the book was a page turner filled with humor and excitement but, because the ideas in the story make us think, often tie in with with the deep roots of mankind that are expressed in mythology.

    When you read how Comedy is defined, there are three main concerns: Love, Marriage and Sex. Because of these themes Comedies are usually smaller stories. Not thinner books with less pages but the story is smaller. Comic Lit does not deal with Order vs. Chaos - Comedy is concerned with society, or a small group, and the conflict is, people versus people.

    The characters are either having fun and falling in love or they are "blocking characters" to keep the lovers apart or friends what have more in common than not with "blocking characters" keeping them apart. The plots are filled with conspiracies, and disguises in order to get the lovers or partners together.

    Part of what makes a comedy work is that the characters are not always in control and therefore, they are not responsible for what happens to themselves. Without personal responsibility the action cannot build to an inescapable conclusion.

    Comedy is meant to show us what society "should" be like and are written to appeal to our sense rather than our emotions. The comedy may remind us of the good feelings we hold in our hearts - however the theme in comedy has none of Plato's reflection of spirit versus flesh or Aristotle's moving the audience closer to a Universal Truth. And the few times that a Comedy crossed the threshold into the great as defined by the likes of Plato and Aristotle they are included in the venerable list...

    KleoP
    July 30, 2005 - 01:09 pm
    I thought a canon was about influence. This is not the same as 'greatness.' In fact it better limits what is eligible. I will reread Bloom's intro, but I thought he discusses his books in relation to their impact on Western Culture, not their greatness per se.

    As to comedy, failing to 'shape or affect civilization' this is far from true. This goes back to 'influence' versus 'greatness.' What is 'greatness?' How can it be accurately measure? Maybe influence is what is measurable. Comedy would have died long ago had it no ability to affect us, rather than having expanded so greatly through the centuries.

    There is plenty of comedy on all of the great books lists linked above, including Tom Jones on two of the three.

    Comedy can be more difficult to critique in depth because of its apparent lightness and the lack of obvious relation to the human condition. Shakespearean comedy is especially easy to dismiss for its seeming lack of relevance gained from a superficial reading or from not bothering with the comedies at all. Getting into his comedies can be very difficult for modern scholars even. But seeing how early Shakespeare used his insight into the psychology of the human condition can only be seen through his comedies, such as The Comedy of Errors. One may start with the obvious madness in the man's later greater plays, but I think it is a shame to underestimate the brilliance of the playwright simply because one has dismissed the comedies as irrelevant to the 'human condition and the human spirit.' Shakespeare early on tied his deep insight into human beings with the traditions of the ancients--this is not something he came into later with more maturity as a writer, this is something he could do from the first. Shakespeare is not so obvious that one may dismiss his comedies as lacking a contribution to the Western Canon. Although, canons may be completely arbitrary allowing the dismiss all of anything--again why influence on later works makes more sense than simply one person's definition of whether comedy is valid or not.

    This also may not be a function of the literary works, but a lack of familiarity and in-depth look into comedy common with modern-day Western Culture.

    And, just because it has a happy ending, doesn't mean it isn't influential or doesn't have meaning applicable to human existence.

    Kleo

    Traude S
    July 30, 2005 - 06:55 pm
    KLEO, may I add a word about the Italian commedia dell'arte, =literally comedy of skill.

    It was popular in Italy and, thanks to traveling companies, throughout Europe for several centuries. It began when professional theatrical companies included in their repertoire a new form of comedy characterized by improvisation on a bare outline ( scenario ), and the use of stock characters, some wearing masks, who combined features of the learned and the poular drama.

    It is this testing of the actors' virtuosity and skill that gave the genre its name, not an association with a professional craft or guild.

    Among the enduring stock characters in the commedia dell'arte were an ingenue with a name like Julia or Lucinda,
    her lover, handsome and impecunious, sometimes named Octavio,
    Pantalone, a Venetian merchant, wealthy but foolish,
    the doctor, sometimes called Graziano, a hopeless pedant,
    a braggart captain, later called Scaramuccia,
    and an assortment of servants to provide anything from sparkling wit to acrobatics as they move in and out of the story, sometimes helping, other times hindering the affairs of their masters and mistresses.

    The oldest of the wily or blundering manservants is Zanni (a dialect version of Gianni or Giovanni); the word was later used to designate the whole troupe of comedians. Later variations of the type included
    Arlecchino, or Harlequin, famous for his patched costume, sometimes called Truffaldino or Mezzetino;
    Tartaglia, noted for his eyeglasses and comic stuttering;
    Brighella, the companion of Arlecchino;
    and the ever-hungry Pulcinella, who speaks in Neapolitan dialect and has an enormous nose. The character survives in the Punch and Judy shows of the puppet theater.

    The commedia dell'arte strongly influenced the development of European comedy and of individual playwrights, such as Molière, Goldoni and Gozzi.

    marni0308
    July 30, 2005 - 09:47 pm
    Traude: You reminded me of the book Scaramouche by Raphael Sabatini. The protagonist plays the role of Scaramouche. I think Sabatini is quite wonderful.

    KleoP
    July 31, 2005 - 11:32 am
    Thanks for the information on Commedia dell'Arte, Traude. Italian Comedy in general, ancient or modern, is not approached by the English-speaking world.

    When my son was about 12 he tried out for a theater group without knowing what their first production was. When the producer handed him the script my son gasped, "Molière!" The producer was delighted that any kid had, first read the title and author, and, second, known Molière.

    I think that even well-educate Americans lose out by not being seriously introduced to the power of comedy. Although I had read Molière as a child because he's funny and was on the bookshelf, I never studied comedy in school, except for the unhappy comedy of satire, until I took a short course on Shakespeare taught by a student of his comedies. I had almost not taken the course because I didn't want to waste time on 'minor plays.' This, again, even though I've always read and enjoyed many forms of comedy, including Shakespeare's. I learned more about Shakespeare's tragedies and histories from studying his comedies than I had ever learned by studying the latter by themselves. Shakespeare was even more amazing than I had known. It took looking at all of him to find this out.

    Kleo

    robert b. iadeluca
    July 31, 2005 - 11:45 am
    As some of you know, I am a clinical psychologist. I consider Shakespeare a top-notch amateur psychologist. It comes out in many many of his writings. Some day (but not soon!) I would like to be the Discussion Leader for a discussion group entitled "Shakespeare the Psychologist" or some such title.

    Robby

    KleoP
    July 31, 2005 - 12:20 pm
    Egads, Robby, I didn't now that. You would be wonderful fun to have along for the ride with Shakespeare's Comedy of Errors or any of Shakespeare. I was so delighted to read CofE and see how much psychological insight he had into the human condition so early in his career. I know I've said this before, but it's too easy to think you have to go to King Lear or the dramatic to find the madness in Shakespeare--the man was simply amazing. I think you'd be a wonderful discussion leader for Comedy--it would certainly give people a different take on comedy and early Shakespeare. One can take a rather unfunny look at Comedy in this play and/or realize how necessary comedy is for looking directly at one's self.

    Kleo

    Joan Pearson
    July 31, 2005 - 06:45 pm
    Just in from what just may have been the worst weekend of my life. Won't burden you with the details. Popped in to see if there are any last minute nominations (there aren't) and find this lively comedy/tragedy discussion in progress. We always learn so much in the Great Books discussions, don't we? Even the prediscussions. Thank you all for what you bring to the table!

    Beginning August 1...a few hours from now, the voting will begin. You may vote for your top two choices. Wouldn't it be something if a clear winner emerges from such a broad field? I admit I'm expecting it to be too close to call, in which case we'll hold a run-off vote after three days - probably August 4.

    Robby, sign me up! You say "Not now" - when? Name the date!

    Kleo, you are invited to bring a link to other Great Books sources here for consideration next time -

    robert b. iadeluca
    July 31, 2005 - 07:01 pm
    Joan:-We have seven more volumes in SofC. Each one averages 9 months to discuss. So the date is July, 2010.

    I'll be approaching 90 years old at that time and my memory will not be so good, so be sure to remind me.

    Robby

    Joan Pearson
    August 1, 2005 - 06:45 am
    Vote TODAY!

    Polling Place

    Remember...you get to vote your first AND second choices.

    Isn't this fun?

    Hats
    August 1, 2005 - 07:22 am
    Hi Joan,

    1. David Copperfied by Dickens 2. Middlemarch by Eliot

    jane
    August 1, 2005 - 07:31 am
    Hi, Hats...you need to go to the link Joan posted and vote there.

    Here it is: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=422481245419

    Hats
    August 1, 2005 - 08:19 am
    Jane,

    Thank you.

    KleoP
    August 1, 2005 - 01:06 pm
    Joan--

    I will think about this, suggesting an additional list. Mouthing off about the quality of the others is one thing, but actually putting my voice behind one that I think is better.... Kleo

    Joan Pearson
    August 1, 2005 - 02:59 pm
    "More lists" - I was responding to your recent post - "There are others--some better accepted, in my opinion, than Bloom's." We also use Mortimer Adler's and the Encyclopedia Brittainica. It sounded as if you had specific lists in mind...if you remember any of the "better accepted" we'd like to hear about them.

    Have you voted?

    KleoP
    August 1, 2005 - 03:05 pm
    Yes, I was thinking about the Harvard Classics in particular, Joan. When I went to look up lists of Great Books or the Western Cannon there was something additional, though, about accepted lists that stood out to me. I will try to find out what it was. I understood you were speaking about adding (maybe) another link to the lists, this is what I was talking about. While I may complain about the lists, blah, blah, blah, I would have to seriously think about whether adding another link would be useful to me, and ask others if it would be useful to them, and look at the books on it and ask what is gained by adding it. Most of the problems wind up in more modern books and in the definition of 'great' versus 'influential.' It's not so straightforward.

    Have I voted? Yes! And often! And contradicting myself. Lol. Yes, I have voted already. I'm an early to the polls or absentee voter, generally. I like to get it over with.

    This was a much tougher vote than I thought it would be. I was thinking, oh, I haven't read War and Peace in ages, this will be an easy vote. It wasn't easy. Folks offered a lot of interesting choices. Too many, in my opinion. I can't wait to see what the result is--run-off? Or not?

    Kleo

    Joan Pearson
    August 1, 2005 - 03:09 pm
    No, there can never be too many titles to consider. But, yes, definitely there will be a run-off - We'll need to remove the titles with only one vote to assess overall interest.

    Sunknow
    August 1, 2005 - 09:38 pm
    Is it cheating, if you vote for the same book twice? <smile>

    Sun

    Joan Pearson
    August 2, 2005 - 04:31 am
    Good morning, Sun! What a lovely way to start the day. So happy to find you here! Smiling. This will be an interesting week - We hope you stay with us, once you've voted...

    Deems
    August 2, 2005 - 07:19 am
    Joan, thanks for asking Kleo for the other lists she had in mind. I forgot to do that and was wondering what they were. Certainly there are other lists, but many stay out of the business of list-making--or they make very long ones (Bloom does this, for example) and even then they omit many possibilities.

    KleoP
    August 2, 2005 - 10:47 am

    Lol. I think staying out of making lists is probably safest. I can't believe all I left off of my list of favorite authors last time I wrote one.



    Length? Doesn't help. You just try to trick yourself that you will miss fewer truly great books by making a long list. This isn't correct. I think Bloom just looks worse for making such a long list and failing to get to the depth of Lagerkvist for example.



    As to lengthiness, I want to know how many of you who complained about doing all of Shakespeare (well, I think there were only 2 of you) are doing Rembrandt's Eyes at a page a day for the next two years!



    Kleo

    kiwi lady
    August 2, 2005 - 04:54 pm
    Not me Kleo! I love reading but one page a day and dissecting it is not my idea of a great time!

    As for Shakespeare. My relatives may have lived at Stratford on Avon in the time of Shakespeare but their love of Shakespeare never rubbed off on me. It stopped with my great grandfather. A little Shakespeare is enough for my palate.

    Carolyn

    bluebird24
    August 2, 2005 - 08:11 pm
    page does not come up:( I will try tomorrow

    Joan Pearson
    August 3, 2005 - 03:27 am
    Oh dear, Bluebird! Which link did you try? One of the two in the heading? Hopefully the site was experiencing some difficulty when you attempted to vote.

    Try this and if still no luck, post here and we'll figure out some other way to get you in.

    Click here to vote.

    Joan Pearson
    August 4, 2005 - 10:19 am
    Things are getting serious now - we're down to FOUR titles - all excellent! You get two votes - one for your first choice, one for second.

    Click Here to Register your FIRST and SECOND Choices!

    Joan Pearson
    August 4, 2005 - 07:40 pm
    It's quiet in here, but I can see that you are busily voting! Yaay! We've got a horse race to the finish!

    KleoP
    August 5, 2005 - 01:03 pm
    One thing about reading classics and the picks in here, in particular, it's not like anyone really loses whatever we pick. What a fun final four. How to decide? I think having only one vote would be easier.

    Kleo

    bluebird24
    August 5, 2005 - 07:07 pm
    will try tomorrow

    Joan Pearson
    August 5, 2005 - 07:22 pm
    Goodness, Bluebird, that's the second time and so many others are using the link! I'll email you in the morning! We'll solve the problem, don't worry!

    jane
    August 6, 2005 - 07:08 am
    bluebird: What error message do you get? I know some AOL emails don't accept links, so have you tried copying and pasting this url into the address window of your AOL browser?

    http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=416211253198

    Joan Pearson
    August 6, 2005 - 07:20 am
    Thanks, Jane. Greatly appreciated. I emailed her early this morning...suggested the same. Let's see if this works. Plan C?

    bluebird24
    August 6, 2005 - 07:52 pm
    the circles did not come up before:(

    Joan Pearson
    August 8, 2005 - 05:17 am
    Good morning!
    So happy you were able to vote, Bluebird! What a race that was! George Eliot was the winner in a surprisingly close finish with Charles Dickens right on her (high) heels! Note that our George is a woman.

    I've never read this huge Victorian novel you have selected - nearly 700 pages! We will take our time with this one, won't even try to do it in a month. I'm really looking forward to this new experience - "Considered by many to be Eliot's finest work and one of the best novels in English ever written." (editors)

    For those of you who have read Middlemarch, you might be interested in what the respected author, A. S. Byatt had to say about it -
    "It is a hugely ambitious, hugely successful, wise, and satisfying work. I never reread it without discovering something I hadn't noticed before."
    I hope all 51 of you who voted will join in this new adventure, even if it wasn't your first pick. We'll consider the other three in the near future because of the strongly expressed interest. That's a promise!

    Thank you all for your participation in this selection!

    Sunknow
    August 8, 2005 - 12:08 pm
    Fantastic..! I have been planning to read this book again since the day I read the last page the last time. It was in a Literature course on George Eliot at the University back the early 90s. (Yes, I went back to school several times) I loved this book. It's a work of art.

    This is the one I wanted to vote for TWICE.

    You can count on me.

    Sun

    Joan Pearson
    August 8, 2005 - 12:15 pm
    Yesss...alright Sun - a ringing endorsement! We'll get a Proposed discussion out and see how many others we can entice into reading 678 pages! With posts like yours, it shouldn't be difficult!

    KleoP
    August 8, 2005 - 12:35 pm
    Oh, good, a sure bet, a book I know and love, by an author I would read anytime. I don't reread Middlemarch as much as her other works. Also, I admit to reading it for pure enjoyment, not for literary enlightenment or education. It will be fun to discuss it.

    Kleo

    Deems
    August 8, 2005 - 12:56 pm
    Sun--I'm looking forward to rereading this classic novel again too! But I read it even longer ago than you did, back in the early 80s I think and so it will be an almost NEW book to me. It is one of the best of all the Victorian novels I think, and that was the age of great novels.

    This will be fun.

    Who else is game?

    Maryal

    gaj
    August 8, 2005 - 05:34 pm
    Now that Middlemarch won I will have to find my copy of it. It is somewhere on my "To Read" shelves. I am happy we won't try to read it in a month. lol

    Pat H
    August 8, 2005 - 07:02 pm
    I'm with you. The only Eliot I've read is Silas Marner, but I saw part of the PBS production of Middlemarch, and thought I would like to read it. I think I have it in the house, will have to check.

    bluebird24
    August 8, 2005 - 08:12 pm
    http://www.freebookstoread.com/mdmar10_1.htm

    KleoP
    August 8, 2005 - 08:34 pm
    Oh, such restraint I showed earlier.

    MIDDLEMARCH! Middlemarch, George Eliot!!!!!!!

    YEAH!!!!! YES, I'M YELLING!!!!!

    I love George Eliot.

    Kleo

    Joan Pearson
    August 9, 2005 - 10:50 am
    Ginny Ann, Pat, Sun and Bluebird - good, happy you plan to join us. And Kleo - Is that a yes? Hahaha, your enthusiasm is quite an endorsement of the vote.

    Will you all come over to the just-opened PROPOSED DISCUSSION and post just what you have said here? We're reserving train seats to Middlemarch...

    Bluebird, that's one of the good things about the Great Books. Most of them are digitalized. The only trouble is that by the time we get into the 8 volumes of Middlemarch, you are going to run out of paper printing it out...OR your eyes might have trouble from all that reading on the screen. How about you check at your library?

    Joan Pearson
    August 9, 2005 - 05:32 pm

    If you stop in here and wish to learn more about Middlemarch - please come to the NEW DISCUSSION...HERE!

    Scrawler
    August 10, 2005 - 08:23 am
    I'm moving around 8/26 and getting a new computer system. So if the gods are with me I should be able to be with you when we start in Sept. If not I'll be with you in spirit or until I can get on line. I've never read George Elliot, so I'm looking forward to reading. In my research about the 1860s I discovered that Mary Todd Lincoln admired George Elliot's writing as did Jefferson Davis's wife.

    Joan Pearson
    August 31, 2005 - 05:42 pm
    All Abooard! The train for Middlemarch will leave from this platform in the morning...Sept.1 Please join us - Here!

    Joan Pearson
    February 2, 2006 - 08:11 am
    Let's spend the month of February discussing possiblities for the next Great Books discussion. So many possibilities, so many Great Books. We use the lists above to draw from - otherwise it's too difficult (and subjective) for us to decide which books have held up over time.

    This is always a fun time. I'm looking forward to your suggestions.

    Judy Shernock
    February 9, 2006 - 11:16 am
    Hi Joan,

    Are you still looking for Great Books? If so, there is no book by Albert Camus on your list. In my (subjective) opinion he is one of the great writers of the 20th century. If you want a short read "The Stranger" is the book. For a longer read "The Plague" comes to mind. Camus won the Nobel Prize for Literature for his work (Philosophy and Novels). His life story is amazing.

    Interested in your feedback on this suggestion.

    Judy

    Joan Pearson
    February 9, 2006 - 07:59 pm
    Plague and Stranger don't appear on Mortimer Adler/Clifton Fadiman's lists. I guess they were too contemporary at the time those lists were made. But Harold Bloom includes a number of Camus titles. We added Bloom's list as a resource a few years ago because we felt the need to broaden our range of choices.

    I'm sitting here smiling as I type this, thinking about my own Camus experience all those years ago. Read both Plague and Stranger in - in French. Did I appreciate them at the time? Well, the memory is dim, but I do remember struggling with the angst - a French major, reading not to enjoy, but to pass a test most likely. Education can be such a waste of good reading time! I do remember liking Camus better than Sartre, better than Simone de B though...

    Yes, I would like to read Camus with you all, this time for understanding, (not simply translation) - and enjoyment. Let's not forget enjoyment.

    ps. I also entered Don Q. into the nomination box - for old time's sake. It has been nominated time since 1998! One of these years we'll get to it.

    Faithr
    February 10, 2006 - 01:57 pm
    When we do Fae will be the first to nominate it!!I am waiting now to see what other titles people nominate. faithr

    Éloïse De Pelteau
    February 13, 2006 - 03:08 pm
    I have L'Étranger d'Albert Camus in French and I would certainly like to join in the discussion if it was celected provided it was not in the month of July.

    Judy Shernock
    February 13, 2006 - 03:12 pm
    Hi Joan,

    Glad to find others that read all the Existentialist writers from "back in the days". In my real (as opposed to virtual) book group we just finished "Seize The Day" by Saul Bellow. We discussed it from many points of view but , in the end, it seems that this was an example of Anerican existentialism. The Japanese Nobel Prize winner Kenzaburo Oe is also an example of a writer deeply influenced by the Existentialist movement. So we have three Nobel Prizers with an Existentialist outlook. Are you aware of any others? (Writers ,not neccessarily Prize Winners).

    Judy

    Jo Meander
    February 15, 2006 - 07:16 am
    Watching Bleak House on PBS has rekindled my interest in that work. I wouldn't mind reading it again. Any possibility of listing it here? I must admit, though, that I have been waiting to see Don Quijote win the vote. Have never read it.

    Joan Pearson
    February 15, 2006 - 08:50 am
    Judy, did you mean to nominate Camus for a future discussion? I've added it to the slate above. Are you asking about more existential writers? A notable was Jean-Paul Sartre. He wrote, among others, Nausea and No Exit. He too won the Nobel Prize, but unlike Camus, he refused to accept the prize. I forget exactly why. His wife was Simone de Beauvoir, another existential writer. As I remember, these writers all seemed to be trying to understand life and invariably came up empty - bleak and dark they were. I also remember an element of hope though - man's happiness depended on his freedom - but such freedom is too often elusive. Kafka, Dostoyevsky, Beckett all influenced the existential movement of the late 1950's, early 60's. Please share with us - are you enjoying your foray into the Existentialists? Do you find them at all depressing?

    Joan Pearson
    February 15, 2006 - 08:52 am
    Jo, I've not read it either. Others have expressed interest in reading it too, since the PBS series is providing such gripping entertainment. I'll include my own personal view on reading it now - and stress "Personal" because others may not feel this way.

    The book is over 900 pages long. A discussion of the book would take several months. One of the attractions of the novel is the suspense, the unanswered questions Dickens left his readers to ponder from one newspaper installment to the next. A great number of our Netters are hooked on watching the story unfold on PBS on Masterpiece Theater. This means that we would be reading and discussing the book over an extended period of time, knowing exactly what is coming in the next chapter.

    I understand that we would get more of the story through Dickens' text, that we would come to better understand the social issues of the time. But I also feel that the suspense in the plot is the tool Dickens employed to keep his readers hooked through the more lengthy, (tedious?) passages.

    I'm not sure what kind of an experience it would be...if voted as the next selection, I'd be willing to try. I'll just say that I would prefer reading the book at a later date - not when the story is so fresh - and still unravelling on TV. Be assured that it doesn't take too long for my memory to fade these days.

    But of course, I'll add it to the chart above, and if the majority wishes to read it NOW, will be here to give it a try. But you all would have to promise to stick with it ...is that fair?

    ALF
    February 15, 2006 - 11:00 am
    The Impossible Dream(er)

    BaBi
    February 15, 2006 - 01:52 pm
    I really didn't like the one Camus book I read. That was "The Magus". And I'm watching "Bleak House" on Masterpiece Theatre, as I imagine many of you are. I have been glad to see the film, as I found the book the dreariest of Dickens' works. Esther Summerson is being portrayed so wonderfully in the film that it has quite changed my opinion. But as you said, Joan, it will certainly take away any element of suspense from reading the book now.

    Would anyone be interested in reading Anthony Trollope? I am nominating 'Barchester Towers'. Very 'Period' English, of course.

    Babi

    Hats
    February 15, 2006 - 02:00 pm
    Hi Joan,

    Babi,I would like to read an Anthony Trollope novel. I have never read one. I have always heard of "Barchester Towers."

    Joan Pearson
    February 15, 2006 - 02:21 pm
    Hi there Hats, Babi! Good to hear from you. I've added Barchester Towers to the chart in the header. The titles of the books are live links - so you can read more about them. When I read up on Trollope, I see that Barchester Towers is the second of a series...
    "Barchester Towers (1857) is the second of the six Chronicles of Barsetshire, the work in which, after a ten years' apprenticeship, Trollope finally found his distinctive voice. In this his most popular novel, the chronicler continues the story of Mr. Harding and his daughter Eleanor, begun in The Warden, adding to his cast of characters that oily symbol of 'progress' Mr. Slope, the hen-pecked Dr. Proudie, and the amiable and breezy Stanhope family."
    Barchester Towers IS Trollope's most popular novel, but I'm wondering what we miss if we start with the second, as the characters are introduced in "The Warden"...does anyone know? Would you be interested in reading BOTH? You can get THE WARDEN for only $2.00 at Barnes & Noble, but more importantly, it's only 165 pages long! It might be a nice companion and a good introduction?

    Hats
    February 15, 2006 - 02:34 pm
    Joan, I hate to begin the middle of a series. If it's chosen, I would like to read both books.

    Mippy
    February 15, 2006 - 03:15 pm
    I would love to read both The Warden and Barchester Towers
    Over the years, I've read almost all the novels written by Trollope.
    His commentaries on the lives and times in England are outstanding.
    What an excellent nomination!

    Jo Meander
    February 15, 2006 - 03:59 pm
    Joan, I read Bleak House many years ago as part of a novel course. I enjoyed it at the time because we were discussing it three times a week with a professor who thought highly of it, and I was very impressionable. I have been so impressed with the PBS tv version that I thought it might be worth our time, but I certainly see your point about the element of suspense. I'm up for Camus or Cervantes, as I've said.

    Faithr
    February 15, 2006 - 10:41 pm
    The Trollope nomination sounds good to me. I have wanted to read his stuff. I think starting with the first one..introduction so to speak is the way to go since it is hardly longer than a chapter was in our Middlemarch discussion.hahaha faith

    Joan Pearson
    February 16, 2006 - 06:31 am
    Good to see you here this morning.
    Fae, I'd be happy to read the Warden as an intro to Barchester Towers if Trollope should win the vote. As you say, what's 165 pages after we've been through Middlemarch! Hats, when we vote, it will be understood that the vote is for BOTH Trollope novels. There are six of them in the series. Barchester Towers is the second. Let's agree that we will ONLY read and discuss these first two together. Okay?

    We'll keep nominations open for the next two weeks and see what else comes up. Andy hears the Don's windmill in the distance...

    Jo, how many years ago did you have that positive Bleak House experience. I envy you that. Bruce had a similar experience reading Joyce's Ulysses with an enthusiastic teacher - it has remained his favorite all-time novel for 50 years since!

    Mippy, happy to have you back with us - hope computer is running smoothly now.

    Keep the nominations coming!

    Hats
    February 16, 2006 - 07:41 am
    JoanP, I understand. You mean one vote for both books.

    Mippy
    February 16, 2006 - 07:56 am
    JoanP ~
    Thanks for your kind thoughts!

    Jo Meander
    February 16, 2006 - 04:53 pm
    Joan, that Bleak House experience was at least 35 years ago!

    kidsal
    February 17, 2006 - 01:57 am
    Will add my vote for Trollope.

    Was looking at Bloom's Western Canon and found Ishmael Reed's Mumbo Jumbo listed. Has anyone read this book? I have tried, but don't understand a word!!! Would like to read/discuss it with others.

    kidsal
    February 17, 2006 - 02:12 am
    I will vote for Trollope.

    Has anyone read Mumbo Jumbo by Ishmael Reed. His book is listed on Bloom's Western Canon. I have the book -- don't understand a word and would like to read/discuss with others!

    Joan Pearson
    February 17, 2006 - 08:47 am
    A late start here this morning. Sat up last night waiting for the skating to start. Fell asleep on the couch - woke up after 3 am, and then had to sit up and watch the rerun for another hour, counting commercials and all. Sorry to see Johnny Weir lose his program. Just read in the paper that he left out much of it - Sad.

    Jo, see what a lasting impression that teacher made on you! Exactly the same with Bruce and Ulysses.

    Kidsal, we'll vote during the first week of March. Be sure to come in then and get your vote counted, okay?

    Here's a link to the mysterious Mumbo Jumbo which Kidsal refers to. Mumbo jumbo to Kidsal - has anyone else tried it?

    I've received several emails of suggestions from folks who find themselves unable to post. I've sent directions - and hope to see them here today.

    A good Friday, everyone!

    Judy Shernock
    February 17, 2006 - 05:26 pm
    Hi Joan- Re your question about the Existentialist. First I will correct a point. Simone and Jean Paul never married. They had apts in the same bldg. They made a pact that they would never marry anyone. When she had passed child bearing age he took up with a young woman because he wanted to leave an heir. They had a child and Simone de Beauvoir was left out in the cold after devoting most of her life to Sarte. She took up with a younger man , another author, who remained with her till her death.

    Camus,, though he was an existentialist and fought with them in the Underground against the Nazis was not part of their amours. I never found Camus depressing. His attitude was simply "This it how it is. Perhaps Life does not have more meaning than what is happening here and now. However the reader is always allowed to come to his own decision. Sarte is a lot more pushy in trying to get his point over and is not an author I would ever suggest anyone read.

    This attitude worked its way into Psychology but that is off the subject of Literature.

    I must add that I did manage to meet Simone de Beavoir and her young lover when they gave a small literature seminar in Israel. She (and he) were immensely charming.

    So, definitely no to the question '"did I find them depressing?"

    Judy

    gumtree
    February 18, 2006 - 09:31 am
    Great to see this site active again Unhappily I fell by the wayside during the Middlemarch days due to a bit of an ongoing health issue but have been 'lurking' as you say, from time to time. I enjoyed the MM discussion (my first on seniornet) and want to thank all who took part for sharing their ideas and especially the leaders for taking us all the way with GE - what a truly great writer she was. Hope I can be more active in the future.

    Any of the Great Books nominations up so far are fine by me although my preference would definitely be for Camus or Cervantes - Don Q would win I think. I'll come along no matter which one wins.

    Joan Pearson
    February 18, 2006 - 09:46 am
    GUM, it is good to hear from you - and we all look forward to your "second" SeniorNet discussion. Comc back for the vote on March 1 - in the meantime, please feel free to add titles to our slate in the heading!

    I've had some nominations in email - am waiting for two to come in here and make the suggestions before putting them up in the heading.

    Judy, you MET Simone de B!!! Amazing! IF Camus is chosen, you will certainly be a goldmind of information. Which of the two titles up there do you recommend - The Plague or The Stranger? Do you think we should put up just one of the two so the vote doesn't split?

    Deems
    February 18, 2006 - 12:39 pm
    Hi Everyone and Joan--I think it's a good idea to put up just one by Camus. I'll nominate The Plague to be the one that stays. Even though The Stranger has one of the most memorable openings in modern literature: "Mother died yesterday, or maybe it was the day before. I can't be sure." Based on that sentence alone, we know something of the family's history, I think.

    As for Barchester Towers--a great nomination. The other one, The Warden, is, however, not necessary and not anywhere near so good a read. Yes, it is short. But I'm worried that we might lose folks in the doldrums of that book before we ever got to Barchester Towers which most agree is his masterpiece.

    I'm trying to think of something to nominate.

    KleoP
    February 18, 2006 - 12:41 pm
    Yes, please don't split the vote. I am game for anything. I was not up to the Middlemarch discussion, but I'm glad every one seemed to enjoy it so much. It is one of my favorite books.

    I'm not that keen on making the Trollope longer, particularly with the addition of a potentially lesser book. Barchester Towers stands alone. Today the trend is to write books that demand you read the next in the installation. If a book does not stand by itself, it should not have been written. BT is the most popular of the series because it can be read by itself.

    Germinal is a book that was nominated in RAW. It also stands alone and is more popular than the earlier work which introduces some of the characters. One may safely read G by itself.

    Great literature allows us to start anywhere in the story of the lives of the characters. Even a biography does not have to start at the very beginning.

    That's my opinion on the matter, unless somebody knows for certain that it will enhance reading BT, please don't add length to a classic.

    Kleo

    Joan Pearson
    February 18, 2006 - 01:26 pm
    Hello, Kleo, Maryal - How about this? We'll put Barchester Towers up for the vote. IF it wins, we can make The Warden optional for those who wish to read the 165 pages before the discussion of Barchester Towers begins. Those who have read the Warden could chime into the discussion with any background information gleaned from their reading of the Warden. But I'll take it out of the header right now.

    Before touching Camus, I'd like to wait for Judy - since this was her nomination. Plague or Stranger, Judy? The Stranger's opening line is wonderful, isn't it, Maryal? Do you remember a resource - a list of memorable first lines? We had it up somewhere a while back. Really fun.

    Edit: I took out The Warden - will keep the link here for future reference - just in case.

    Deems
    February 18, 2006 - 01:42 pm
    Joan--Sorry. Didn't mean to step on Judy's toes. Of course she should decide since it is her nomination. Scuse please.

    Deems
    February 18, 2006 - 01:57 pm
    Call me Ishmael.

    I was sick, sick unto death with that long agony, and when at length they unbound me and I was permitted to sit, I felt my senses leaving me.

    LONDON. Michaelmas Term lately over, and the Lord Chancellor sitting in Lincoln's Inn Hall. Implacable November weather. As much mud in the streets, as if the waters had but newly retired from the face of the earth, and it would not be wonderful to meet a Megalosaurus, forty feet long or so, waddling like an elephantine lizard up Holborn-hill.

    YOU don't know about me without you have read a book by the name of The Adventures of Tom Sawyer; but that ain't no matter.

    KleoP
    February 18, 2006 - 02:14 pm
    Deems, the MASTER example of a book that doesn't need the first part read: Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Tie that in with an opening sentence. And don't we occasionally mention bildungsromans?

    Hats off to you!

    Kleo

    Judy Shernock
    February 19, 2006 - 11:25 am
    Hi Joan and you all out there,

    Although The Stranger is my personal favorite I would go with The Plague for a discussion since this is a longer and perhaps more universal book. Also I really loved the loooong discussion of MiddleMarch. It seemed the longer it went the more in depth the discussion developed. So in order not to split the vote lets go with The Plague.

    I will be away from Feb. 24th till March 6th. If by any chance I have use of a Computer I will log in. But can't be sure. By the way my second choice would be Germinal since it is another book I have always wanted to read and never did.

    Judy

    Judy Shernock
    February 19, 2006 - 11:39 am
    Hi Joan and everyone else,

    I wrote a long message which disappeared. Perhaps it will appear again when it finishes its visit to invisible message land. So in short I said Don't split the vote.! Go with "The Plague" which is a longer and more universal book.

    I will be on vacation from Feb. 24th till March 6th and don't know if I will have a computer . If I do I will Log in and vote. My second choice is Germinal which I have always wanted to read and never did.

    Judy

    Judy

    Judy Shernock
    February 19, 2006 - 11:42 am
    I can't beleive the first message showed up here after 30 minutes. Wonders will never cease!My second signature showed up in the second message too. Good grief! Is there a Poltergeist on this site?

    Judy

    Hats
    February 20, 2006 - 03:04 am
    I am becoming undecided. Our votes don't count yet, right? I looked at the link to "Don Quijote." The link doesn't tell much about the plot. What exactly is "Don Quijote" about? Are there two ways to spell the name Quijote? Maybe I am mistaken. Is his name also spelled with an "x?" Like Quixote? Where did I get an "x" from?

    Hats
    February 20, 2006 - 03:05 am
    I am becoming undecided. Our votes don't count yet, right? I looked at the link to "Don Quijote." The link doesn't tell much about the plot. What exactly is "Don Quijote" about?

    Are there two ways to spell the name Quijote? Maybe I am mistaken. Is his name also spelled with an "x?" Like Quixote? Where did I get an "x" from? In my dreams?

    Hats
    February 20, 2006 - 04:15 am
    I have made up my mind. I would like to nominate "To the Lighthouse" by Virginia Woolf. I have never read anything by Virginia Woolf.

    Joan Pearson
    February 20, 2006 - 09:29 am
    Good morning! Hope you all had a pleasant weekend. Are you watching the Olympics? What I love is the constant drama - you never know what to expect. Best reality TV! Still haven't watched last night's Bleak House installment. Hope it taped.

    - Hats, that's right. We'll begin to vote and narrow the list on March 1. Right now we are just nominating. I love this part of the process.
    -


    I was puzzled too at "Quijote" when I first saw it. In Spanish the pronouncation of the "x" and the "J" is the same, I think. It is quite common to see "Quijote" in the titles of various translations as often as "Quixote - you didn't dream you saw that "x" Hats. (If we do decide to do DON Q, we can talk later about which translation. Back when it was first nominated, the Raffel translation was just published, with rave reviews and we thought at the time it would be a good translation choice. Personally I like it when we are all reading different translations - makes for a better discussion. -

    The titles in the chart of nominations in the heading are all links to Barnes & Noble, so you can read reviews and descriptions of the books. I'll agree with you - the B&N site didn't do a good job telling us what Don Q. is about. So I went to Amazon and found this...hope it helps.
    Having an immediate success when first published 400 years ago, and with its experimental form and literary playfulness, Don Quixote has been recognized as the world’s first modern novel. Don Quixote tells the story of a middle-aged Spanish gentleman who, obsessed with the chivalrous ideals found in romantic books, decides to take up his lance and sword to defend the helpless, destroy the wicked, and win the heart of his beloved Dulcinea. Seated upon his ever so lean horse, and accompanied by the pragmatic and faithful squire Sancho Panza, Don Quixote rides the roads of Spain seeking glory and grand adventure. Along the way the duo meet a dazzling assortment of characters whose diverse beliefs and perspectives reveal how reality and imagination are frequently indistinguishable. Don Quijote de la Mancha
    Will add recent submissions to the Nominations list in the header...back in a moment with some questions for you.

    Hats
    February 20, 2006 - 09:41 am
    JoanP, thank you.

    Joan Pearson
    February 20, 2006 - 09:58 am
    You are very welcome, Hats! I love the "To the Lighthouse" nomination.

    I'm not sure that Germinal was nominated, but Kleo mentioned it and Judy would like to read/discuss it - her second choice. So I entered it in the chart. Judy when you get back from your vaction we will probably be working on the second and final vote. Will be looking for you then if not before.

    I continue to get nominations in the mail. One is for a work by Victor Hugo or Flaubert. Anyone interested in submitting a title at this time? Another is for De Tocqueville's Democracy in America. BBC, Robby led a very popular ongoing discussion - in case you'd like to view the discussion HERE in our Archives. And the recent American Vertigo doesn't fit into the parameters of our Great Books discussions - too recent.

    We are still wide open for more suggestions. Does anyone feel a great enthusiasm for anything nominated to date?

    marni0308
    February 20, 2006 - 12:20 pm
    I always think of Don Quixote with an X because whenever I've heard someone British pronounce it, it sounds like "quick sott."

    Joan Pearson
    February 20, 2006 - 12:22 pm
    And then there's one of my favorite words - "quixotic"...

    The thing is, it's Spanish ...we need to know how Spanish speakers usually SPELL it.

    Mippy
    February 20, 2006 - 12:51 pm
    Germinal by Zola was nominated in RATW, so I started it, and did read several hundred pages,
    but have not been able to finish it.

    Unfortunately, after a rousing beginning, some of the characters progressed into the belief that Communism would be the cure to their problems.
    Sorry, Zola, it didn't work out for Communism.
    Perhaps others would enjoy this novel, anyway, but it's on the back burner for me, after the plot took that turn.

    I hope this comment is not considered a "spoiler," but Amazon and other reviews gave too little indication of what the novel covered.

    Deems
    February 20, 2006 - 01:04 pm
    Don Q (x or j) is well-described in Joan's message above. Mostly these two, Don Q and Sancho Panza, spend most of their time on the road having many adventures. "The road is better than the inn," said Cervantes.

    I think Germinal is too much a downer for Spring although I enjoyed it many years ago.

    Hats--To the Lighthouse is a good nomination.

    I'll see if my daughter, who is taking Spanish at the moment, has any dictionaries that might tell us whether to use a J or an X.

    I've always spelled it with an X, probably because when I read it a long time ago, there was an X in the text I read.

    Later.

    Deems
    February 20, 2006 - 01:08 pm
    Here's a link to an exhibit at Johns Hopkins. Frontispiece of a first edition, with an X;

    go here

    Deems
    February 20, 2006 - 01:11 pm
    And here's the title page of the first edition of Part II:

    go here

    X wins again.

    Hats
    February 20, 2006 - 02:00 pm
    Deems, thank you!

    KleoP
    February 20, 2006 - 02:17 pm
    Well, heck, Crime and Punishment is about a murder that didn't work out, Hasek's Svejk doesn't know about WWII, War and Peace is about a war we all know ended badly for Napoleon's army and we still read them.

    If we won't read about failures in the human endeavor surely we've got to eliminate all books not just Germinal.

    And it's great for us to know the fall of the Iron Curtain and dismiss Zola for not knowing about it, but why not read the book in the context of its political times? Why not learn about what these men were seeking, and were there really French communists at that time and why?

    In fact, this book gives political social background to the early 20th century history of America that most people don't know very well, such as the Supreme Court decisions, leading right up to Korematsu.

    Let's not dismiss history because one doesn't like some aspect of it. I don't like Pol Pot, but this doesn't mean I shouldn't learn about the killing fields of Cambodia. Ditto Hitler, but I don't dismiss Weisel's Night. It still happened. Why not try to understand why?

    "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." The 20th century is one ugly past to have to remember, but it seems we're still living its ugliest aspects today. Why not try to understand its roots, rather than dismissing them? The nationalistic murders of hundreds of millions in the 20th century has deeper roots that are worth learning about.

    There are people today that believe communism is the way to go. Murderers are often justified, to themselves at least. If we don't read books where people believe things we don't agree with, we won't have many choices. And when it comes to history there is no time that is all good.

    All of these novels nominated offer characters who progress, like all human beings, into wrong thinkings.

    Kleo

    bbcesana
    February 20, 2006 - 02:49 pm
    1. some French author - Hugo, Flaubert, etc. - because we examined so much history in Middlemarch that this period might prove interesting (as you can see I am pretty sketchy on French history)

    2. Democracy in America - very good classic and there is a new book out along similar lines: American Vertigo which also looks interesting which is by a Frenchman Levi.

    3. I just read Henry James: The American (France late 1800's) and he said that to understand his writing, the 'advanced list' would be: 1 - The American, The Tragic Muse, 3 - TheWings of the Dove, 4 - The Ambassadors, 5 - The Golden Bowl Because his work reflects what Americans are (often in contrast to Europeans) and this stage of history, it might be a good list - albeit rather long.

    Deems
    February 20, 2006 - 04:01 pm
    Kleo--I hear you. In fact, I rather like dark and bleak. I'm one of those people who goes to movies and prefers tragedy and suspense and won't go to a comedy unless 1) it is a very good comedy and 2) I am in a good mood to begin with.

    As a matter of fact, I am currently teaching Saramago's Blindness. What I maybe should have said a little clearer is that I agreed with whoever posted that Germinal was slow going after several hundred pages. I should look back and see who it was, but I am lazy.

    Anyway, it surely doesn't matter to me what we pick. I'll be here whatever the choice.

    Maryal

    KleoP
    February 20, 2006 - 05:35 pm
    I think most people are lazy at times. I just picked up Saramago's Stone Raft a while ago, but put it down while busy with some other things. He is a superb writer, and I wish we had gone to him in Portugal instead of some of our other Mediterannean reads. I like light reads at times, but I prefer to discuss literature. Saramago is literature.

    Your post makes me rethink my prior comments about the Zola, though. Germinal is not a light read because he demands that you contemplate and dismiss the course of communism, socialism, the roots of nationalism, the desires of the unwashed masses of flotsam of the 19th and 20th century 'revolutions' that shook the world. I want to literally shake the silly 19th century idealists in Germinal and warn them about their stupidity.

    I want to throw the book down in disgust, or throw it away, or throw it at someone. Then I have to ask myself, what other course of action these men had? And then I thank God that I live in a different era and open a Robin Cook to stop thinking for a while.

    Kleo

    Judy Shernock
    February 20, 2006 - 06:15 pm
    Deems- Blindness by Saramago has been compared to "The Plague". I found it less hopeful than The Plague.

    Since I suggested the book I will give folks a small summary of the contents . The book was written in 1946 and takes place in Oran ,Algiers. A Plague falls upon the city and Dr. Rieux and others have to confront the indifference and denial of the Authorities. Finally the city is put under quarantine. Some react with immense longing for loved ones,, others try to escape, some beleive they are being punished for past sins while others gather immense wealth which they would never had had otherwise. Some of the characters feel less alone because others are suffering as they have been for a long time.

    The main themes are Love, Exile and Suffering. The baciilus has been compared to the Nazis or evil movements in general. They may lay dormant for years but can break out at any moment if we are not watchful. The people are very real and easy to identify with or to hate, depending on your outlook.

    Hope this is not too discouraging. Judy

    KleoP
    February 20, 2006 - 06:24 pm
    Yes, Camus is not without hope in spite of his themes.

    Kleo

    Joan Pearson
    February 20, 2006 - 08:07 pm
    I think I'd be one staying behind, longing to see my loved ones, Judy. Thank you so much for the summary.

    BBC, Barbara, so glad you were able to get in and post. Is there a specific title you would like to nominate by Hugo or Flaubert? Hugo's Les Miserables? Hunchback of Notre Dame? - We have discussed Flaubert's well-known Madame Bovary not so long ago.

    Robby led an exhaustive discussion of Democracy in America - it lasted several years, so we'll pass on that one.

    I'll put Henry James in the heading. You've listed several titles. If we put them all up, we risk splitting the vote. Do you have any preferences? Mine would probably be "The Golden Bowl" - but since it is your nomination, it's your choice.

    Thanks for the Quixote links, Maryal. I'm sure Hats feels better now that she knows she didn't dream up the "x".

    Back to the Olympics

    Hats
    February 21, 2006 - 02:24 am

    bbcesana
    February 21, 2006 - 08:26 pm
    Hugo's Les Miserables - is this how I would post it? I have wanted to read this for a long time and it would help my interest in French history and conditions at that time.

    (I seem to have skipped European history in my upbringing and am thirsty).

    This however would take us a while.

    The American is very good in ways - early James. The Golden Bowl is complex and very psychologically complex - not sure if would suit us but I would read that also.

    Joan Pearson
    February 22, 2006 - 08:07 am
    Les Mis is now entered, BBC. Will wait on James. If you feel that Golden Bowl is too complex - would you like to nominate James' American? Does anyone else have a favorite James to consider if BBC leaves it up to us?

    gumtree
    February 22, 2006 - 09:06 am
    WOW! What a great selection - so many favourites makes it hard to choose. I was happy with either Camus or Cervantes but now we have Germinal, Les Mis. and Anna K all compounding the question. I think that following on from our reading of Middlemarch it would be interesting to read either the Zola, Hugo or Tolstoy - they are all 19C, big reads and will possibly offer useful comparisons.

    I'm not really in the mood for James or Woolf.

    Deems: I must say that I'm with you in my preference for the dark and bleak - give me tragedy any day. Somehow it always hits the spot while comedy misses me by a mile - unless, of course, all the planets are aligned.

    Deems
    February 22, 2006 - 10:52 am
    gumtree--Pleased to have you in my company. I don't know why I've always preferred tragedy and dark. But I know that when I am in a foul or low mood I cannot bear comedy. If I am in a fine and joyful mood, I still prefer drama, suspense, the dark.

    I like comedy when I'm feeling fine and when the comedy is realio trulio funny (my definition, of course).

    KleoP
    February 22, 2006 - 11:44 am
    Oh, who nominated Anna Karenina? The new translation used by Oprah Winfrey is excellent.

    I always wonder why people choose this over War and Peace? War and Peace is simply the best romp through a war ever done, a much much better novel, imo, than AK. WP is a book every reader should read, because most will wind up thinking it was time well spent and a book worth revisiting.

    Some people who love Tolstoy prefer AK, of course, over WP. However, I can't find the post nominating AK, and would like to know why someone picked it over WP, what particular reason, if any?

    AK is not so much dark as sloggingly depressing. I slogged through it with Oprah 2 summers ago and wound up resenting the time I spent on it. No, wait, I think I resented not rereading WP--something I do with great joy about every 5 years. If you've not read WP you won't understand the thrill of this book.

    I can't disagree with AK in general, as all of Tolstoy is worth reading, and I have read the book a number of times in my life. I won't reach for it again after Oprah's Summer of AK (2004?), though.

    Still is there some particular reason for choosing AK over War and Peace?

    Gumtree, so you like the dark and bleak but not Woolf or James? Is it their writing style?

    I do like dark and bleak.

    Kleo

    Deems
    February 22, 2006 - 12:42 pm
    Kleo--What translation do you like for War and Peace? I read that book driving with my parents cross country when I was in college. Read the whole thing because I wanted to say I had read it. My father continually interrupted by calling my attention to mountains and other aspects of the scenery. I'd glance up and then go back doggedly to the book.

    I went almost crazy keeping the characters straight because of all the alternate names for characters, some familiar, some endearing. But hard for me at the time.

    It's all just a very vague memory now; what I remember when I think of the title is the movie which I think came out several years later, at least one version of it. It's probably about time for a remake.

    Anyway, I'd love to know what translation you read.

    Maryal

    Hats
    February 22, 2006 - 01:05 pm
    I did read Anna Karenina during the time Oprah picked it. I loved it. It's more than a tragic love story. So much of the book is about Tolstoy's thoughts and feelings. After reading AK, I did know more about Tolstoy. I came away thinking of him as a peaceable and earthy man. He believed in hard work too.

    I would like to read a biography of Tolstoy.

    Hats
    February 22, 2006 - 01:08 pm
    When I say peaceable, I am thinking of his thoughts toward all mankind. I don't remember his political feelings about war and such.

    CathieS
    February 22, 2006 - 01:38 pm
    Hi all..

    I've been absent from the board for a few months, but did finish MIDDLEMARCH on my own and adored it. Thank you, Kleo!

    I'd like to nominate Dreiser's AN AMERICAN TRAGEDY, but all the choices thus far look excellent.

    KleoP
    February 22, 2006 - 01:38 pm
    I've read about 3 different translations, all about the same. Tolstoy is a master story teller, not a master of prose, so it's more important to get the story. He translates very well.

    People who are not familiar with Russian complain about the patronymics. Rosemary Edmonds' translation of WP eliminates them. This makes it hard for people who speak Russian to keep up with the names!

    In my opinion one should rigorously sit down with a chart of characters beside the book, or on your lap, and refer back and forth until you get the characters straight. Do this at the beginning of each Russian novel and you will soon master it. There are too few Russian names and the patronymics are too big a clue to too many things to eliminate them. They have meaning.

    I wish that the Anna Karenina translators did a War and Peace. However, other than this any one that includes the proper Russian names would be fine. I have a friend who is a professor of Slavic Literature, and I could ask him which is best.

    Kleo

    KleoP
    February 22, 2006 - 01:40 pm
    Oh, Dreiser's on my short list.

    Scootz, you're welcome. I hesitated at first because I was afraid others would not like it as much as I did, and Middlemarch is a very special book to me. I could not keep up with the board, but it was clear that many people really enjoyed George Eliot's Middlemarch.

    Now, it's not logical, and it's no reflection on anyone if someone else doesn't share your taste in books, but somehow it's nice when others do enjoy something that you really like.

    Kleo

    Deems
    February 22, 2006 - 01:53 pm
    Kleo--Aha, you have given me the word I was searching for in my grading-befuddled mind--patronymics. Yup, they were at least part of my problem. My best friend in college took Russian. I took Greek. And I'm sure they add meaning in context. The chart idea is a good one, but you have to remember that I was in the back seat of a car with half of it occupied with hanging clothes and other stuff and having enough trouble just holding the book--it was a hard cover. If memory serves, there were charts and things in either the front or back that I referred to.

    Good to hear you say that Tolstoy is not a stylist. Now I know why I love Dostoevsky more. Maybe. Maybe that's the reason, not maybe I prefer D.

    M

    KleoP
    February 22, 2006 - 02:05 pm
    Well, it's a toss-up. Dostoevsky is a great writer, so is Pasternak, so are many Russians. I think they all write better, stylistically than Tolstoy.

    Dostoevsky won't do it, even if I prefer to read him, Pasternak won't even if he is a much more brilliant writer. Hugo does it almost as well as Tolstoy, but Hugo's prose is much finer.

    Yet, sometimes I want a good story. Sometimes I want a brilliant story. And sometimes I want the best story ever written, and this requires the Bible or Shakespeare or War and Peace.

    Kleo

    Joan Pearson
    February 22, 2006 - 02:45 pm
    hahaha, Gum, "give me tragedy every day!" We'll vote to narrow the list on March 1 and then again for the top choices. We aim to please most of the people most of the time.

    Thanks for the nomination, Scootz! American Tragedy is up there - happy to hear that you finished Middlemarch. That was a very special discussion.

    We are on our way to town to see Measure for Measure this evening at the Folger. Have you seen it, Maryal? Aaron Possner is directing and it is supposed to be as wonderful as his Twelfth Night.

    Will be in this evening to catch up and see if I have missed any nominations in your posts. Later!

    Judy Shernock
    February 22, 2006 - 02:54 pm
    I also read War and Peace as a young person (I was crazy about Russian Lit at the time). I was sick for three months and much of the time was devoted to W & P. It came with all the characters with their real and Nicknames laid out in a few pages before the story began. It also contained a map. Although I liked the book it never lived up to my favorite Russian writer , Dostoyevsky. Anna K. also was never a favorite of mine. I found it a little too obvious.

    So in matters of taste in Russian Lit there are many schools of thought. I would be happy to go with Dostoyevsky if someone proposes Crime and Punishment. I nominated it last time. I have already suggested The Plague so can't go back now.

    Leaving on my trip tomorrow. Talk to you all when I return.

    Judy

    Deems
    February 22, 2006 - 04:25 pm
    Joan--Have a good time at the play and do remember to report back on it. I'm not much a fan of the comedies, but I've heard (on WETA maybe) that this production of Measure for Measure is very good.

    However, even if I wanted to go, I am buried under papers. Have just finished one section (22 sestinas and accompanying prose explanations), still have another class and have to read 2 Samuel tonight.

    The Bible course is starting to run on its own a little though, and that's good.

    Maryal

    CathieS
    February 22, 2006 - 04:49 pm
    Re Dostoevsky, etc...I read ANNA KARENINA when Oprah had it as her club selection and I liked it, but only liked it, didn't love it. I recently read BROTHERS KARAMAZOV and really hated it. I doubt I'd ever try WAR AND PEACE after that. Something about the Russian literature is very heavy and plodding to me. Give me the Brits any old day of the week!

    Inre the nomination for GERMINAL- I haven't read it, but did just recent buy the new B&N edition of Zola's NANA. It looks good.

    KleoP
    February 22, 2006 - 07:52 pm
    2 books about deep dark subjects don't make all of Russian Literature any more than Faulkner and Hemingway speak for all of American Literature. War and Peace and Tolstoy is as far removed from Dostoevsky as one can be. And, as I already said, I don't think AK can hold a candle to WP.

    Kleo

    Sunknow
    February 22, 2006 - 08:30 pm
    I'm listening in...as usual. And I am surprised that some of you don't like the Russian novels. I have always been partial to them, and go back every so often and read one of them. They are dark and dreary, but somehow I've always felt that like Dickens (also dark and dreary), they really represent the people that lived in the time frame represented. War and Peace is wonderful.

    I am especially fond of some of the later historical novels, like Peter the Great. I haven't read that one lately either. I take spells readying these books.

    Sun

    CathieS
    February 23, 2006 - 07:47 am
    Well, your point is certainly well taken and I didn't mean to categorize *all* Russian literature, but only that which I have read, which is admittedly a small amount. I've only read a small amount of Victorian Literature also (considering the amount there is in total), but of the two, that appeals to me more.

    I'm not a literature expert and I don't pretend to be. I'm exploring and discovering these books at a later age (55). I'm really a beginner at it all.

    My background is education (elementary) and I did have to read some literature but not that much porbably compared to anyone who has that background.

    CathieS
    February 23, 2006 - 07:49 am
    Are you referring to Massie's book on Peter the Great? or another novel? I'm asking because I'm interested in the Massie book.

    Joan Pearson
    February 23, 2006 - 09:11 am
    War and Peace is up on the chart - I'm not sure, but I think I heard a nomination for it? It is hard to tell sometimes whether I'm hearing a nomination for a discussion or an expression of having enjoyed reading a book in the past. It would help if you use the word "nominate" if you are proposing a title for discussion.

    Judy, do I hear a nomination for Crime and Punishment? You can nominate as many titles as you wish. We read and discussed Dosto's Brothers K I guess it was five years ago. A lively discussion as I remember. I remember a very positive uplifting experience.

    Measure for Measure was good, maybe not as good as I was expecting, but a good solid performance. Maryal, I've been thinking of your classisfication of the play as a comedy. I've never seen it performed before, but know it is one of Shakespeare's "problem plays." To tell the truth, though there were some comedic scenes, I really didn't see it as a comedy.

    You know how I love surprise endings? Before attending a Shakespearean play, I always read the first four acts (Folger editions, of course) and leave the last for a surprise. More often than not, the ending is fairly predictable...but this was a total surprise. This morning I read the fifth act and see that the production last night was faithful to the play. The surprise ending that didn't really end when the curtain came down. I just can't bring myself to be more specific because someone might want to read the play and I'd be a real spoiler.

    Keep the nominations coming...would anyone like to read/discuss Shakespeare's Measure for Measure? - it is very topical, dealing with the same religion/politics/womens'rights issues we face today.

    Mippy
    February 23, 2006 - 09:37 am
    Nomination: Shakespeare: Measure for Measure

    Good idea, Joan!
    I need some Shakespeare to be running through my mind,
    but it isn't easy to do it without motivation.
    Not a nomination:
    My current favorite Shakespeare is Othello, because of the wonderful opera by Verdi.

    KleoP
    February 23, 2006 - 09:54 am
    Joan, I specifically did not nominate War and Peace because Anna Karenina is already up there. I wanted to know who nominated the latter and ask them if they would consider nominating WP instead. I still would like to know this, who nominate AK, and whether or not they would consider WP instead.

    Kleo

    Joan Pearson
    February 23, 2006 - 10:19 am
    Mippy, I will happily put Measure for Measure into the chart. We did Othello here on SeniorNet many many years ago - (before we started preserving our discussions in the Archives. It was a great experience. When I walked into the Folger Shakespeare Library looking for some background on Othello productions - 1998 I think it was, they hired me and I have worked there ever since.

    The person who nominated Anna is in love with Anna, not Tolstoy and does not wish to consider W&P. There may be others who would like to read War and Peace, not Anna. I'm willing to consider both of these plays for this reason. Do you still wish to nominate W&P, Kleo?

    Deems
    February 23, 2006 - 10:35 am
    Joan P--Yes, M for M is a problem play. But if you categorize all the plays into tragedy, comedy, history, it falls under comedy. Shakespeareans are a confusing bunch, aren't they?

    Isn't this the production that has puppets for some scenes? (the more comic ones, I assume)

    M

    KleoP
    February 23, 2006 - 11:51 am
    Yes, Joan, I would like to nominate W&P then. Thank you.

    Kleo

    Sunknow
    February 23, 2006 - 04:17 pm
    Scootz - you ask about Peter the Great...yes, I was referring to the Massie book. I had to go check to make sure. Memory failed.

    There right next to it on the shelf I found another good book: W . Bruce Lincoln's massive "The Romanovs - Autocrats of All the Russians". It is truly massive, 750 pages, and when you add the Notes and References, and the Index, it's 852 pages (with pictures). I had almost forgotten that one.

    I haven't the slightest idea why I got so interested in the Russian books...I seem to take spells, get interested in a time or period, and read, read read...everything on one topic about a place, or person.

    In this case maybe it was something I read long ago, or the movie about Anastasia, daughter of Nicholas II and Aleksandra. I no longer remember that either.

    Sun

    CathieS
    February 23, 2006 - 05:00 pm
    Sunknow- that Massie book does look great and I remenber when it came out. Like you, I read somehting, it sparks an interest, and I'm off on a tangent of a certain type book or subject. I love when it happens actually, because then I find out about books I never would have discovered.

    On a side note- I read RUSSKA, by Rutherfurd years ago and just adored the Russian history in it,

    bluebird24
    February 23, 2006 - 09:28 pm
    I vote for adventures of huckleberry finn gullivers travels

    kidsal
    February 24, 2006 - 01:27 am
    Have just started The Mysteries of Udolpho by Ann Radcliffe (1764-1823) - writer of Gothic fiction. On Oxford Classics list.

    ALF
    February 24, 2006 - 06:39 am
    Have you ever taught Measure for Measure?

    To have a Tragedy, isn't comedy a necessary component?

    Joan Pearson
    February 24, 2006 - 06:46 am
    Bluebird, as many titles as you wish. This will help those who have not yet made up their minds. I could REALLY go for Gulliver's Travels! We'll start to whittle down the list March 1 - next Wednesday.

    Kidsal - let us know what you think about Mysteries of Udolpho - I've never read it... was it written in the 18th century? Early 19th? Let us know?

    Maryal, yes, the puppets provided comic relief in the <<<comedy>>>, Measure for Measure - and were very well done. They weren't marionnettes...or hand puppets - but very stylish, deco-looking huge puppets the puppet meisters held in front of their own bodies, arms in sleeves of the puppets, so their hands were the puppets' hands. The best was that of the Friar, who was impersonating the Duke. The Duke held the puppet in front of him for most of the play and spoke his lines...the Duke was Mark Zeilser - very well done. I guess the impersonation of the Duke led Posner to employ the puppet device...and then two other characters were portrayed as puppets too. This was all Posner's humor. It was quite funny when all three puppets were interacting in the same scenes.

    The play itself was definitely NOT a comedy. I would say that Shakespeare sounded angry, or frustrated at the hypocracy of those in power. Don't misunderstand - it was enjoyable, though the ending unsettling - but really not a light comedy. Though, Andy, it wouldn't be classified as a TRAGEDY - unless you consider the human condition a TRAGEDY.

    CathieS
    February 24, 2006 - 06:52 am
    I'd be very interested to hear how you like this one. I almost bought it myself a while back, but opted for the similar time frame LADY AUDLEY'S SECRET.

    CathieS
    February 24, 2006 - 06:53 am
    I've never been here for the voting. Do we vote for just one title? We have an awesome list going- it'll be hard to choose.

    ALF
    February 24, 2006 - 06:55 am
    Puppets, Joan? The Duke and who else were portrayed as puppet (meisters?) Noone can do it like Shakespere when it comes to tragedy imitating real life.

    Deems
    February 24, 2006 - 08:09 am
    Andy--I don't think I've ever taught Measure for Measure. I go light on the comedies when I teach Shakespeare because I like to do two history plays, all four of the great tragedies and sometimes one of the others.

    Let's see--comedies. I've taught Twelfth Night, All's Well That Ends Well, Midsummer Night's Dream, and The Tempest (not really a comedy either, Joan). And something else. The Merchant of Venice.

    I'm just not a big fan of the comedies especially the ones where there's a lot of disguising going on. They're fun to see often, but reading them just doesn't do it for me.

    Joan--I would like to have seen those large puppets.

    Deems
    February 24, 2006 - 08:10 am
    We don't vote until Joan rings the voting bell in March. Then, if I remember correctly we vote and then vote again for the top three or so.

    I can't remember if we vote for first and second choice. Everyone will have to wait for Joan to explain.

    M.

    Joan Pearson
    February 24, 2006 - 08:56 am
    Yes, Pat is going to set up the voting booth for March 1...as we did last time for Middlemarch. There will be two different votes...the first is to pare the list down to those which get the most votes, If you haven't voted here before, you get to vote your first choice and your second. We ask you not to vote the same title for both first and second choice.

    Once we have a shorter list, we'll vote again - same thing...first and second choice. I look at it as a 'transition" play. Can we make a new category?

    It's interesting to me that Shakespeare's last "comedy" was Measure for Measure - after than he wrote his Tragedies.

    CathieS
    February 24, 2006 - 09:49 am
    Now that you say this procedure, maybe I *did* actually vote for MIDDLEMARCH- I can't recall right now. At any rate, I was rather trying to gauge my reading schedule now for when we begin the next great book. From what you say here, it will be a while before we actually start the book, no? I've just today started two new reads for other groups, so I hope to get a jump on those before we begin here.

    Joan Pearson
    February 24, 2006 - 10:18 am
    We're considering an April 15 start date...moved back from April 1 for those who want to read Dr. Jeckyl/Mr. Hyde. How does that sound, Scootz?

    CathieS
    February 24, 2006 - 10:32 am
    That sounds great! I'm glad I aksed because i thought you were starting pretty soon. That helps me schedule all my "stuff"!

    I'll come back on the first to vote!

    Deems
    February 24, 2006 - 11:40 am
    Joan--I think a new category would be very useful. The old division goes back to those early folios. Back in that day, if everyone (well nearly) didn't die in the end, it was a comedy. And then there were histories, which, come to think of it, are often tragedies (Richard III, for example).

    Why don't you approach some of the Shakespearians at the Folger and suggest new categories?

    gumtree
    February 25, 2006 - 09:17 am
    Interesting that Bluebird should nominate Gulliver's Travels a day or so ago as it screened here this evening. A long and lavish production with Ted Danson as Gulliver and a huge cast including Gielgud/Sharif/O'Toole et al. Danson was something of a surprise packet and at times managed to create a tremendous mood and atmosphere. I didn't know he had it in him - but then I guess it would have been a great part to get. The book would make a good discussion here, superb satire and pertinent today in all sorts of ways.

    Kleo - I didn't mean to imply that I dislike Woolf or James, only that at the present time I would prefer to read and discuss other writers. It's just how I feel emotionally at the present.

    Deems: Glad to know you're not a big fan of Shakespeare's comedies - Me either!!! They never quite 'come off' for me. On the other hand, isn't it odd how the comic relief in the tragedies and histories seems totally real and believable.

    Joan P: Thanks for clarifying the voting procedure. I'll give it a go when the time comes.

    anneofavonlea
    February 25, 2006 - 11:38 pm
    and I am particularly partial to Barchester Towers.

    Anneo

    Deems
    February 26, 2006 - 08:22 am
    anneo! Haven't seen you in a while. How you be?

    anneofavonlea
    February 26, 2006 - 06:27 pm
    This working again takes up ones time, but is rewarding. Glad to see things moving along here.

    Anneo

    kidsal
    February 27, 2006 - 01:16 am
    PBS will be airing Trollope's He Knew He Was Right.

    Hats
    February 27, 2006 - 01:53 am
    Kidsal,

    Thank you. If it came on last night, I missed it.

    Joan Pearson
    February 28, 2006 - 05:20 am
    We're back from a long weekend in Memphis to see the grandchildren. This long distance relationship isn't easy, but they are so little, I feel the need to see them often so they don't forget our early days together. They moved there in August, this was our 6th trip down there!

    Anneo, it would be wonderful if you were to find time to join this venture. I know what you mean about working, not only time-consuming, but then you are beat when you get home. Will keep fingers crossed, however...

    We'll begin the voting process tomorrow. If any nominations were overlooked and you'd like to see them included in the preliminary vote tomorrow, please let me know, will you?

    I'm sorry to have missed the Trollope. How was it? Did anyone see it? There are so many good nominations this time - making a choice will not be easy!

    CathieS
    February 28, 2006 - 07:47 am
    I am so excited about our list here. Yes, Joan it's going to be hard to decide. I am even considering the WAR AND PEACE now, since this group got me to read MIDDLEMARCH after so many years of it being on my shelf. Have you ever read one that long before?

    I have several Trollope's and have never read him either and am excited at the prospect. Is it March 1 yet??

    marni0308
    February 28, 2006 - 09:28 am
    I'm pleased to announce that tomorrow is March 1 and our Founding Mothers book discussion will officially begin!!!!!

    Marni

    kidsal
    March 1, 2006 - 01:27 am
    I vote for Barchester Towers, Trollope. Just received the books today. Also bought Walden.

    horselover
    March 1, 2006 - 03:15 am
    I vote for "War and Peace" or "An American Tragedy"

    Joan Pearson
    March 1, 2006 - 05:26 am
    You guys are early birds! I need to get the voting booth open and ask you to return and vote for your FIRST and SECOND choices. We'll be using the SURVEY MONKEY again as we did last time for Middlemarch.

    Let me go get the BOOTH OPEN - and some coffee. Back in a flash!

    Joan Pearson
    March 1, 2006 - 05:48 am
    Click this Graphic to Vote -

    Be sure to scroll down and vote for second choice too!
    Vote for two different titles!


    Now to find Horselover and Kidsal - if I can catch up with them!

    Joan Pearson
    March 1, 2006 - 06:08 am
    It would be great if you would post here when you vote. Let us know if you experience any problems, okay? I don't know if I can wait a week to find out which titles have made it to the short list!

    CathieS
    March 1, 2006 - 06:25 am
    Not sure if you mean to post my actual vote here or not, but I'll do that just in case.

    1st choice- AN AMERICAN TRAGEDY

    2nd choice- WAR AND PEACE

    Hats
    March 1, 2006 - 07:01 am
    Joan,

    The voting machine worked fine for me. I nominated one book. Then, changed my mind. Is that alright? Do I have to stick with my nomination?

    Deems
    March 1, 2006 - 07:19 am
    Hats---Voting is separate from nominating. What if you are the first to nominate a book and then ten other people come along and nominate other books? And you see two books that you would rather read than the one you nominated?

    That's the great joy of the nominating process here. You are in no way obligated to support whatever you nominated!

    Hats
    March 1, 2006 - 07:21 am
    Yippee!! All of the choices look so good. Oh, so we are nominating and not voting. Deems, thanks for explaining.

    patwest
    March 1, 2006 - 07:44 am
    Hats, we are voting on the 13 books that were nominated. Joan will choose the top vote-getters and we will vote again in a run-off vote.

    Besides the vote is secret. No one knows how you vote if you use Joan's voting page.

    Hats
    March 1, 2006 - 07:49 am
    Pat, thank you. It took awhile, I've got it now.

    ALF
    March 1, 2006 - 07:51 am
    I have voted.

    Joan Pearson
    March 1, 2006 - 07:52 am
    Scootz, did you place your vote in the Survey Monkey site? That is the only place your vote gets counted.

    Hats, nominating days are over. Today we are VOTING. It's okay if you vote for titles other than those you nominated. I still can't make up my mind!

    Andy, I'm glad that you voted without difficulty.

    I'd better go find Scootz as we can't enter her choices posted here for her. Survey Monkey is keeping track of the vote.
    Click this Graphic to Vote -

    Be sure to scroll down and vote for second choice too!
    Vote for two different titles!

    Hats
    March 1, 2006 - 07:54 am
    Joan,

    I have voted.

    Joan Pearson
    March 1, 2006 - 07:59 am

    gumtree
    March 1, 2006 - 08:19 am
    I've voted too - easy to vote - the difficulty was in making the choices. Such good books nominated means that whichever wins will be great to read and discuss. Can't wait to start.

    CathieS
    March 1, 2006 - 08:32 am
    Besides the vote is secret. No one knows how you vote if you use Joan's voting page.

    ::thud:::: Man oh man, I can't do anything right here.

    Joan, I think I did vote at the monkey site. I clicked the link and chose my 1st and second choice. I got confused when you asked us to post here when we voted. I don't know what's wrong with me that I can't do something so simple. Let me know if I'm in the vote, ok?

    Deems
    March 1, 2006 - 11:12 am
    Sorry to confuse you, Hats. Thanks, Pat, for saying it clearly.

    I have voted.

    Hi everyone.

    KleoP
    March 1, 2006 - 11:52 am
    Scootz, Joan just asked folks to post in here ALSO, as Joan is chomping at the bit with curiosity, like I always am when the voting just starts. I voted like you did, with a switcharoo:

    1st choice- WAR AND PEACE

    2nd choice- AN AMERICAN TRAGEDY

    I have changed my mind about books I've nominated, especially when someone posts about a book they're particularly excited about rereading or recently enjoyed reading. I hadn't even thought of nominating An American Tragedy although it's been on my short list (the stack on the bottom stair) for over a year.

    There's not a single book on this list that I would give less than 100% enthusiasm to reading.

    Kleo

    CathieS
    March 1, 2006 - 12:01 pm
    I have changed my mind about books I've nominated,

    Well, as you can see, I changed MY mind about never reading WAR AND PEACE. I recently got the new-out-in-paperback B&N Classics edition, and thought..""Well, I always wanted to read MIDDLEMARCH and never got up the courage to tackle it alone." Now that I have WAR AND PEACE, I thought it made sense to vote for it and tackle it with a group as well.

    AN AMERICAN TRAGEDY is one I've had long while on my shelf, have always wanted to read.

    The choices are all delicious, though there are one or two I don't think I'd read but we shall see. Never say never, right?

    Hats
    March 1, 2006 - 01:45 pm
    Deems,

    You didn't confuse me. I just repeat myself at times.

    Deems
    March 1, 2006 - 03:22 pm
    Hats===

    Mippy
    March 1, 2006 - 03:35 pm
    Voted

    anneofavonlea
    March 2, 2006 - 03:38 am

    Jo Meander
    March 2, 2006 - 06:01 am
    voted.

    bbcesana
    March 2, 2006 - 09:02 am
    bbcesana - voted

    marni0308
    March 2, 2006 - 10:44 am
    voted

    Joan Pearson
    March 2, 2006 - 05:39 pm
    So happy to see so many of you get in on the vote. Remember to come back next week for the final, okay?

    Joan Pearson
    March 6, 2006 - 05:12 pm
    What we've been waiting for - our Readers have spoken! Now comes the hard part - making a decision, voting for ONE of FOUR fantastic selections you would like to discuss here beginning April 15! (See the Header)

    Click this Graphic to Vote -

    Be sure to scroll down and vote for second choice too!
    Vote for two different titles!

    bbcesana
    March 6, 2006 - 09:32 pm
    ok, I voted, I can go outside and enjoy our lovely SF weather more, why whine.

    Hats
    March 7, 2006 - 03:30 am
    I have voted.

    CathieS
    March 7, 2006 - 05:52 am
    I voted!

    These are all big books, if you ask me, bbcesana, with Barchester being the smallest (500 or so). You must mean compared to WAR AND PEACE? my other three editions are all 800+ pages.

    Any rate, I'm excited about any one of these and look forward to our discussion. Joan, just so I know, will you take another week to make the final decision? Thanks in advance.

    Joan Pearson
    March 7, 2006 - 06:33 am
    I like to give the vote a weekend to reach those who only have weekends free to compute. Note in the heading - we'll leave the vote open between yesterday, March 6 and Sunday, March 12.

    Let's not care about the length of the book in the Great Books - though it is a committment. We take our time on the short ones too - spend a year on the Iliad if you can believe that!

    To answer the question - why do we ask folks to vote for two different titles. We want to come up with the title which has the largest number of participant interest. One person voting for the same title twice skews that number.

    CathieS
    March 7, 2006 - 06:57 am
    I apologize, Joan. I did assume the heading was the same and didn't even notice the dates. Mea culpa!! I got so excited about the voting being here I just couldn't slow down. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. Back next week to see what we chose.

    Mippy
    March 7, 2006 - 07:04 am
    Voted!

    All four are terrific choices!

    ALF
    March 7, 2006 - 07:43 am

    KleoP
    March 7, 2006 - 08:53 am
    "We want to come up with the title which has the largest number of participant interest. One person voting for the same title twice skews that number." JoanP

    What about showing the most interest? That's what people are doing voting for the same title twice, I would guess, is proclaiming heavy interest in one particular book. I'm not sure that raw numbers of folks interested is going to be the same as folks really committed to reading and discussing the book.

    It may be skewing one number, but it's not skewing another number: personal commitment to a particular title.

    I suppose it depends upon what you want the "largest number of participant interest" for, though.

    And thanks, Joan, for answering my post in the right location although I posted it elsewhere.

    Kleo

    Judy Shernock
    March 7, 2006 - 04:23 pm
    I returned after two weeks and the titles changed. Anyhow I chose Barchester Towers by Trollope since I have been unable to read one of his books on my own. I get stuck even though I know it is a great book.

    Second choice is Bleak House since the PBS series whetted my appetite for that delicous story.

    Judy

    Joan Pearson
    March 7, 2006 - 06:00 pm
    Yes, we were up to 13 nominations. The four you see were just selected by participants yesterday. Did you register your two choices? It sounds maybe not. I'll write to you.

    You need to vote here:
    Click this Graphic to Vote -

    Be sure to scroll down and vote for second choice too!
    Vote for two different titles!

    gumtree
    March 8, 2006 - 03:27 am
    I've voted. Looking forward to knowing the final result.

    Jo Meander
    March 8, 2006 - 06:48 am
    VOTED!

    bbcesana
    March 8, 2006 - 11:29 am
    voted for two

    Judy Shernock
    March 8, 2006 - 03:05 pm
    Yes, I voted. When will this discussion start? Right now I am involved in "My name is Red" discussion and hope the two don't overlap. Judy

    Joan Pearson
    March 8, 2006 - 03:09 pm
    The discussion will start April 15, Judy. Red is supposed to last until April 1 - but at the rate it's going, it will probably run over.

    Hats
    March 8, 2006 - 03:15 pm
    Maybe until next April, 2007?

    JoanK
    March 8, 2006 - 03:27 pm
    I voted. The site made me vote for two books, when there was only one on the list that I wanted to read. Oh, well.

    CathieS
    March 9, 2006 - 06:49 am
    The suspense is killing me here!

    Hats
    March 9, 2006 - 06:54 am
    Me too!!

    CathieS
    March 9, 2006 - 09:17 am
    Hats,

    I think I'll just NOT think about it.

    What great books discussion?

    Joan Pearson
    March 13, 2006 - 08:43 pm
    A record 76 votes, Scootz! Hopefully we will figure out the results by tomorrow. Hold on...

    CathieS
    March 14, 2006 - 06:03 am
    Thanks, Joan. I remember now that I only joined MIDDLEMARCH after it had been chosen already. So...this is my first time through the whole voting process. I must have looked here 20 times yesterday to see if the result was ready as I didn't know when to expect it. I'll hold on, I'm sure it's a ton of work getting it up and ready. I appreciate knowing so I don't have to keep checking today! LOL

    BTW- I dreamt which book we chose- it'll be interesting to see if my dream was right.

    Joan Pearson
    March 14, 2006 - 10:33 am
    HAHAHA, Scootz, I wish I had dreamed that dream! This has been a difficult situation! -

    I know you've been waiting for the results of the vote. You'd think there would be a clear winner with 76 votes cast. (This was an all-time record.) Please understand that we struggled to interpret the results. Here's why:
    We believe it is the recent popularity of the Masterpiece Theatre production of Dicken's Bleak House that made it a heavy favorite in the SECOND CHOICE vote. However, it did not win the FIRST CHOICE vote - and that vote was really too close to call.

    We were uncomfortable choosing BLEAK HOUSE on the basis of that second choice vote over other titles that received more first place votes. Some of you had earlier voiced concern that the element of suspense would be missing for those who had recently seen the PBS production, which may explain fewer first choice votes for this title.

    Will you be a good sport, please, and vote just ONE more time - for ONE title? We promise to go with the winner, even if it is just by one vote! And if there is another tie, we'll do both!
    Click this Graphic to Vote (AGAIN) -

    Deems
    March 16, 2006 - 05:27 pm
    Just back from the Outer Banks (of North Carolina) and what do I see? Another vote required. OK, will go vote right now. SEVENTY-SIX, Joan P? We must have a lot of lurkers around here. 76???????

    Deems
    March 17, 2006 - 01:46 pm
    Andy--Cross your fingers. Maybe this is your lucky year. I too voted for Don Q, in whatever translation. How many days are left for the vote?

    Maryal

    Joan Pearson
    March 17, 2006 - 01:59 pm
    Sunday pm, we'll close - will announce Monday morning. This is really something, isn't it? Usually a clear winner emerges before the vote and no one is surprised at the outcome. WHAT happened this time???

    Joan Pearson
    March 20, 2006 - 06:06 am
    I don't know about you...but I'm exhausted. This was the closest race in our nearly 10 year history in the Great Books.

    So, who "WON"?

    First thing this morning - before turning on my computer, I read the newspaper. On the first page of the Washington Post Metro section, there's a photo of Anne Holton, the Virginia governor's wife at her annual Book Club meeting. The nine members have been going on an annual retreat for the last 13 years to select the readings for the year to come. THEY chose Barchester Towers! I have to say, I was in the mood for Trollope this time. Maybe I can get into Anne Holton's group! YOU were not in the same mood - Barchester was dead last.

    Maybe after the next Masterpiece Production of He Knew He Was Right... you too will catch the Trollope fever.

    Joan Pearson
    March 20, 2006 - 06:28 am
    I found the interest level surpisingly high - 77 votes altogether... (Thank you, Pat for all the poll work! Above and beyond!)

    What was even more amazing to me - even with such a great number of votes, no clear winner emerged (except at the very end.) The last time, Middlemarch was the clear favorite. That never happened this time. American Tragedy, in third place, was only three votes behind the winner. Simply amazing!

    Joan Pearson
    March 20, 2006 - 06:35 am
    Clearly the Masterpiece Production of Bleak House awakened interest in Dickens...those who voted for it want to - a.) READ MORE, or b.) TALK ABOUT the production with others.

    It is and has been my fear that with the element of suspense removed, it would be very difficult to maintain interest in the book discussion through the 900 pages. Maryal has assured me all along that there is a lot more in the book not included in the three Masterpiece Theater productions - enough to maintain interest. And the vote certainly shows there are many who felt the same.

    Joan Pearson
    March 20, 2006 - 06:46 am
    OK, give it up I will - for that cherry, Hats! I must say it is easier coming in this morning with the final result after having read your comments here these last two days. You must know that I have been nominating and voting for (though this time admittedly for Trollope) Don Quixote and each time he finished high in the vote, several times in the second slot. This time, without much campaigning for what is known as the FIRST MODERN NOVEL, the nod goes to the Don! - by two votes - NOT counting Bluebird's!

    I think this is a magnificent choice, that we will have a superb adventure, one we will talk about for years to come!

    Now, how many of those 77 voters do you think will come to the dance?

    Joan Pearson
    March 20, 2006 - 07:08 am
    Be warned...no matter which translation you choose, the book is long...and my Raffel translation has rather small print. That might be a consideration for you.

    Hats
    March 20, 2006 - 07:11 am
    JoanP, enjoy your cherry. You deserve it!

    Is one translation better than another translation? I need the easiest translation.

    Hats
    March 20, 2006 - 07:15 am
    Scootz,

    The one with the red cover. Is it in very small print too?

    CathieS
    March 20, 2006 - 07:27 am
    So there's no confusion...this is the edition I bought this weekend:

    LINK click here

    I honestly am not sure how to quantify the size of the print. To me, it's normal size print like every other book I read, no larger, no smaller.

    If print size is a concern, I'd go to the store and look at the different editions to be sure. Sorry I can't help any better than that.

    Hats
    March 20, 2006 - 07:36 am
    Scootz,

    Thanks! I just ordered the red one. I like red too. I can't wait to start the book. Thanks for the link.

    Joan Pearson
    March 20, 2006 - 08:10 am
    From what I've heard, the 1999 Raffel translation is supposed to superb, but the print is sort of small...though not too small for me and that's saying something! If possible, I think you would be wise to go to a book store and see for yourself. Plenty of time - we won't start till April 15. (Raffel has a red cover too.)

    Hats
    March 20, 2006 - 08:33 am
    I ordered the Elizabeth Grossman translation. I hope this translation doesn't find me lost in the woods without escape.

    BN:0060934344 Translated by:Edith Grossman Publisher:Harper Perennial Subject:Classics Subject:Literary Copyright:2005 Publication Date:May 2005 Binding:Paperback Language:English Pages:992 Dimensions:8.02x5.32x1.67 in. 1.67 lbs.

    CathieS
    March 20, 2006 - 08:59 am
    Hats-

    We can be lost together. LOL Don't fret-we'll be just fine. I'll leave a trail of crumbs for you to follow.

    Jo Meander
    March 20, 2006 - 09:02 am
    Whoopee! Not that I want to reveal my vote! Hope to be here every day or at least several times a week! I've wanted to read this forever.

    Pat H
    March 20, 2006 - 09:11 am
    Scootz, I don't exactly have a connection to the book. I read some stories out of it, much abbraviated, in Junior High school, and liked them as stories without appreciating the style and social commentary. It's just that lately I havbe come across a lot of references to Don Q, quotes and comments, and each time I think "it's time for me to read that book".

    Deems
    March 20, 2006 - 09:26 am
    The dogs and I are dancing in a celebratory circle. I was so hoping for Don Quixote.

    YAY!

    So happy.

    And Joan's right. It is long. It will last us for quite a while.

    YAY!

    And it's fine to have lots of translations.

    Hats
    March 20, 2006 - 09:39 am
    Deems, that's good to hear about the translations.

    CathieS
    March 20, 2006 - 09:46 am
    Hats-

    I read ANNA KARENINA a while back and wondered about different translations. So, I took my copy and compared it with another translation. What I found in that case was that the differences were so minimal. I can't say that's the same in this case as I have no knowledge but when you think on it, how different can translations be? They have to be true to the original story. I think it may be actually fun/interesting to see if there are any differences that count.

    KleoP
    March 20, 2006 - 09:47 am
    It would be nice to have a clear cut post indicating what book won rather than having it buried in the midst of other posts.

    As to which translation, Hats, that can depend upon the reader, as easier can mean less accurate? And I think if small print makes a book hard to read going through hundreds of pages of it will be sure to end in quitting. Maybe there's an edition in large print?

    So, it was:

    Don Quixote Cervantes Bleak House Dickens American Tragedy Dreiser Barchester Towers Trollope

    Why diss' Trollope for being dead last since he made it to the final four? They're all excellent authors, for whatever reason one book or author won over the other.

    And is the preference for the Raffel translation?

    Kleo

    KleoP
    March 20, 2006 - 09:49 am
    Scootz, the differences can be major. For example, some versions of War and Peace don't use patronymics. This makes it impossible to keep the characters straight. Hugo has some blisteringly poor translations. In the mid-19th to late 19th century Russian literature was so popular in Britian that it was translated haphazardly by many different authors, often from unauthorized editions of the books, some of these sloppy translations are still in print because they are out of copyright. So, there can be quite a bit of difference, and there can be very little, and some folks mind, and others don't.

    Kleo

    KleoP
    March 20, 2006 - 10:03 am
    Yes, it can be amusing at times also.

    We read Remarque's All Quiet on the Western Front in English for my book club while one member read it in German. There were some surprising difference. It added a lot of interest to the discussion to learn these differences. I don't know how they will go with Cervantes as one of the big trends is to "modernize" the literature, something done poorly by everyone but Seamus Heaney, in my opinion.

    Kleo

    Hats
    March 20, 2006 - 10:03 am
    Kleo and Scootz,

    I have already ordered the Grossman translation. I think it will work fine. I have stopped worrying about the print. I think the size will work out fine.

    I would like to know what is a "knight-errant?" Is he a clumsy knight?

    gumtree
    March 20, 2006 - 10:05 am
    It might be about 9am on Monday where some of you are but here it is after 1am on Tuesday morning - just couldn't go to bed without knowing the result. Today by chance I happened to wear an old marcasite and enamel lapel pin of Quixote galloping off on his trusty steed with sword upraised ready to right an unrightable wrong- I think it was an omen.

    I haven't seen the Raffles translation but will look about for it - I already have the 'Red One' (Grossman) and an old (well, 1957) edition of William Starkie's translation in paperback (small print) I'll try to balance one on each arm with maybe Raffles on my knee so I guess you could say I'll come to the party!

    Hats
    March 20, 2006 - 10:07 am
    Maybe a "knight-errant" is one prone to make mistakes.

    Gumtree, I am glad the suspense is over.

    CathieS
    March 20, 2006 - 10:10 am
    Hats-

    from dictionary.com

    errant- Roving, especially in search of adventure: knights errant.

    Hats
    March 20, 2006 - 10:12 am
    Scootz, thanks!

    I think this is going to be fun. I am in the mood for adventure.

    marni0308
    March 20, 2006 - 10:16 am
    HURRAY!!!!

    I've voted for this one first ever since I joined the book club!!!

    HURRAY!!!

    Pat H
    March 20, 2006 - 04:09 pm
    Translations

    When I was in the discussion of "Iliad", the participants were using several different translations. Different people preferred different ones. In particular, one translation that I found totally unreadable when I looked at it in a bookstore was well liked by several other people. The moral is, different people like different approaches, and if you don't like your translation, look at another.

    CathieS
    March 20, 2006 - 04:26 pm
    Oddly enough, I cracked my edition today and found at the back of it, several versions of the opening page. Seriously, the differences are very slight. And I cannot imagine that a translator would veer so far off course as to be far afield of the original message. In any event, I'm good to go.

    Oh, and btw- this promises to be a challenging read from the looks of things. I know so very little about this book that just about everything is going to be a new experience for me. I'm pumped!!

    JoanK
    March 20, 2006 - 04:29 pm
    I can't believe I forgot today was the day, and didn't come in until now.

    HOORAY! I not only got the book I voted for, but I guessed them in the right order!!! Excuse me for blowing my horn, but I never never guess right!! I think I'll treat myself to an extra cup of cocoa.

    Now the bad news. I've tried to read the Don three times and never gotten very far. I figure if I can't read it in this company, I have no hope. This is my last chance. So spur me on friends.

    I've had a copy sitting around hopefully so long that the pages are falling out. Time fora new one!

    Pat H
    March 20, 2006 - 04:34 pm
    But, Joan, you've never tried to read it in such good company before.

    Deems
    March 20, 2006 - 04:40 pm
    Congratulations, Joan K, on getting the order right. I didn't even attempt a guess. Couldn't type because I had all fingers crossed for Don Q.

    Joan P--If it's any comfort to you, I had Barchester Towers as my second choice. It's a really good novel and I read it years ago so I don't remember a thing about it except that I liked it a lot. I'll nominate it next time, assuming of course that I survive all the tilting at windmills.

    JoanK
    March 20, 2006 - 04:42 pm
    I'd like to read it, too, but I felt I needed a break fron Victorian England.

    Joan Pearson
    March 20, 2006 - 05:05 pm
    JoanK, you picked the winner and everything else in the order of the vote. You win the <<major award>>. Now you have to guess what the prize is in order to receive it...

    I think you will be having so much fun in the discussion that you and the poor knight will have no need for spurs. We hope to make it our own - to learn something about ourselves perhaps. And to get to know one another a little better in the process!

    Maryal's right - different translations make the discussion richer. When you don't understand a passage, other translations tend to clarify. Just ask a lot of questions - like Hats does. I love your questions, Hats - you make us think and delve further than we ordinarily would.

    And Kleo's right - if you get a translation that doesn't "fit" your vision, you won't finish. So try on for size if you can.

    Hopefully we will have a new home for Don's discussion up by tomorrow afternoon and we can carry on this discussion of translations over there.

    Tomorrow morning is the annual meeting at the Library of Congress Center for the Book. You know that SeniorNet is a Reading Promotion partner there, right? I get to brag about you all once a year. Need to get my report written up now, but will work on Don's new home next.

    CathieS
    March 20, 2006 - 05:58 pm
    Joan, Will the pace on this read be similar to MIDDLEMARCH? Curious so I can pace my other groups and not overextend myself. TIA!

    Joan Pearson
    March 20, 2006 - 06:20 pm
    Yes, I'd say so...but if we need more time, we'll take it. I'm thinking four months, but it might be more. Pacing oneself is a virtue - a necessary virtue..

    CathieS
    March 20, 2006 - 06:29 pm
    Excellent!

    Jo Meander
    March 20, 2006 - 07:57 pm
    Hats, a long time ago I learned that a knight-errant is one who either has no allegiance to a particular nobleman or one who has forsaken that allegiance. That's why he is out looking for adventure or what he considers a worthy cause.

    Hats
    March 21, 2006 - 02:51 am
    JoanP,

    One word or sentence leads my mind to wonder and wander like a lady lost at a flower show. If you don't ask questions, you won't know how to care for your new "baby." In this case my "baby" is my book. To get the most enjoyment out of it, I need to ask questions, become a child again.

    Deems,

    I am glad your wish came true. I voted for Don Quixote too. Now I can applaud along with you.

    Jo,

    So the Don is trying to prove his worthiness by roving and finding adventures he can conquer. In my mind, I am thinking Don Quixote might have many very modern twists.

    CathieS
    March 21, 2006 - 04:58 am
    Hats,

    I'm a retired teacher, and you can take it from me, the only dumb questions are the ones not asked. Questions help us ALL learn, not just you.

    Hats
    March 21, 2006 - 05:38 am
    Scootz,

    All of my teachers would say those words. It took me this long to take their wise advice. I am so happy to meet another teacher.

    CathieS
    March 21, 2006 - 06:20 am
    Last night, I decided to take up an easy classic from my shelf. Can you believe I've never read LITTLE WOMEN? There on the first pages was this-

    " ...especially Jo, who had been considered a "Sancho" ever since she was born."

    Funny how things like that pop up when you never knew about them and suddenly there they are all over the place.

    Hats
    March 21, 2006 - 06:23 am
    I have read "Little Women." I don't remember the word "Sancho." Is that a Spanish word? It makes me think of Don Quixote. Is Sancho written on the book somewhere?

    I can't wait to learn about the author life too. This is like making a cake from scratch for me. I don't know anything about Don Quixote. I read a few pages on Amazon. I laughed. That's when I decided to choose Don Quixote.

    CathieS
    March 21, 2006 - 06:28 am
    Hats- Sancho Panza is Don Quixote's sidekick, if you will- his straightman.

    OT- there is a new book out by Geraldine Brooks (?) who wrote a book about the Plague years. It's called MARCH and is written from the standpoint of Mr. March, off fighting in the Civil War. I may read it after LITTLE WOMEN.

    Hats
    March 21, 2006 - 06:40 am
    Scootz,

    I want to read "March" too. I have a book called "The Glory Cloak" by Patricia O'brien. It's another one about Louisa May Alcott. I haven't read it yet.

    You know the saying now, "So Many Books, So Little Time."

    Did you read Geraldine Brooks' book, "The Years of Wonder." I wanted to read it. I just didn't know what to expect, like mice and other gorey things. Is it hard to take?

    gumtree
    March 21, 2006 - 08:33 am
    MARCH is an interesting book - I read it late 2005 and liked it so much I gave a copy to DIL at Xmas. She had never read Little Women so we had to rectify that as well. Brook's novel certainly gives another slant on Alcott's characters especially March and Marmee.

    I've been browsing in the Don - it's just magic!

    Hats
    March 21, 2006 - 08:50 am
    Gumtree,

    I will put "March" on my library list.

    kiwi lady
    March 21, 2006 - 11:34 am
    I am afraid I could not face Don Quixote. I had a go at it years ago and just could not get interested in it. I wish you all well in your discussion.

    Carolyn

    CathieS
    March 21, 2006 - 12:19 pm
    Ooooh, that sounds discouraging. yet gumtree calls it magic. Time will tell......

    marni0308
    March 21, 2006 - 01:12 pm
    I just feel I have to tackle the Don. There are references to it every time I turn around. I've never even opened it. But, I had high hopes that one day I'd be reading it with a book club. And here we are!!!

    bluebird24
    March 21, 2006 - 08:23 pm
    I want to read! where do I stop?

    ALF
    March 22, 2006 - 07:54 am
    Don! Holy-moly I can barely believe it. My vote has been cast for this "quixotic" story forever, I think. We will take the trek with the chivalrous Don and his goomba Sancho. I am soooo pleased with these results. I have the story on my Library Edition so I'm not sure which translation it is. I will have to check the jacket.

    Hooray for the starry-eyed ones.

    Joan Pearson
    March 22, 2006 - 06:14 pm
    So happy to hear of your enthusiasm! We're waiting for you all to show up over in the Don's new Casa - located in the Proposed section of the main Books' menu.

    We've got enough food and drink for an entire band of knights and dames. Come on over and make yourself right at home!

    Carolyn, I hope you reconsider. This might be the first time you really enjoy what many say is the greatest novel ever written. Judy, you too! Wouldn't be quite the same without you too.

    Come on! We're waiting - HERE!

    Judy Shernock
    March 23, 2006 - 03:25 pm
    Oh dear! I don"t want to be the spoiler here. I will read along with the posts but I read so much of the original in Spanish when in H.S. that it reminds me of the teacher, who though she didn't have a real whip, made us feel whipped if we translated wrong.

    Perhaps reading the book for literary value may be different.

    Can you beleive it, that despite all that, I have a statue of Don Q. in my living room. I bought it on a trip to Mexico many years ago. Perhaps it is the sadness thar posseses that statue that makes me so hesitant to go on this ride. Indeed he is the saddest literary figure I have come upon.

    Judy

    ALF
    March 24, 2006 - 06:25 am
    Fear not! Come along and stumble through this with Joan, Maryal and our riding crew. We can do this. It will be fun to dream the impossible dream.

    Hats
    March 24, 2006 - 06:29 am
    Sad? Judy, I thought of this as a humourous story. That just shows how much I know. Well, Alf is here to boost us back up on the horse. Is that our transportation?

    Deems
    March 24, 2006 - 06:45 am
    I hope you will reconsider, Judy, because I don't think our discussion will remind you of your Spanish teacher. At least I hope not. And you won't be translating (which is work) but reading one of the new translations and thus concentrating on the story.

    I don't think Quixote can be summed up as the saddest character in literature. His adventures, real to him, give him a rich fantasy life, and humor for the reader, at least many of them. He is too complex for summary.

    So grab a lance and shield and one of Andy's horses, and get on over to the proposed discussion (link above).

    Hola!

    Joan Pearson
    April 14, 2006 - 07:41 pm
    Please do join the current discussion of Don Quixote!

    BaBi
    April 17, 2006 - 06:05 am
    Sorry, gang. I read "Don Quixote" many years ago, and found it heavy sledding. It's such a major undertaking, I don't think I can handle it with the other books I'm reading right now. Just call me a wimp. ..Babi

    Hats
    April 17, 2006 - 06:10 am
    Babi,

    I might "wimp" out too. I am definitely taking it day by day.

    Joan Pearson
    April 23, 2006 - 02:17 pm
    I would miss seeing both of you... Day by day, Hats! I am certain you would find it worth the effort, Babi. Just think - the greatest novel ever written! Admittedly it is an effort now, but should get easier down the road. Day by day, ten minutes a day?

    ChazzW
    April 26, 2006 - 04:23 pm
    Pearson 'ole pal.! I'm disappointed in you. I see you're positively ripping through Cervantes. Have you lost your patience? When I read this the other day, I immediately thought, "Joan will relate to this!"

    This group has been meeting once a week (in a pub of course) to read Finnegan's Wake for over 10 years - and they're on page 251. Now there's a pace worthy of Great Books, huh?

    C

    robert b. iadeluca
    April 26, 2006 - 04:41 pm
    Here in this CyberPub, our group has been meeting for almost five years discussing Durant's "Story of Civilization." We are only in Volume Four and have seven more to go.

    Robby

    Joan Pearson
    April 28, 2006 - 07:07 am
    Cholly, you have been missed, my friend. I'd slow to a crawl, a pub crawl to have your sparkling wit in Quixote. The Inquisition has a "sobering" effect on all of us. Robby, I've been meaning to audit Story of Civ - might learn something on the Inquisition. Catholic school education skimmed right over that whole affair.

    The link to Finnegan's Wake chat has expired - Finnegan's Wake! Sounds as if these folks made it through Ulysses unscathed!

    KleoP
    April 30, 2006 - 12:10 pm
    Chazz--

    Your link does not work. I'm curious about the group, though.

    Kleo

    ChazzW
    May 1, 2006 - 04:36 pm
    I should know better. Those links last only two days. It's a money thing. Herwewith. And so forth.
    SOMERVILLE It's a quiet night at The Thirsty Scholar, an Irish pub and dating bar on Beacon Street. A handful of bored-looking guys sit at the bar, watching a hockey game on the TV, and a few couples and small groups chat quietly at scattered tables. But in what Irish pubs call "the snug," an alcove off the dimly lit main room, conversation is animated, laughter frequent, and there are more books than bottles on the table. The Boston-area "Finnegans Wake" Reading Group is in session.

    The 10-year-old group, which meets weekly, is carefully making its way word by word, line by line, and page by page through James Joyce's famously difficult final work. The book is 628 pages long, and they're now on Page 251. "The `Wake' is an enigma, but something new comes out each time we meet," says Erik Jespersen of Somerville, a multimedia consultant and a composer who is an original member of the group.

    There is no agreement on what "Finnegans Wake" is really about, and its language, much of it invented by Joyce, is so convoluted and peculiar that most people find it unreadable. For true Joyceans, however, the challenge is its own reward, and Jespersen doesn't consider the group's pace usually a page or less each meeting unduly slow.

    "After all, it took Joyce 17 years to write it," he notes.

    The title is a reference to a popular comic song of Joyce's day about a hard-drinking hod carrier named Tim Finnegan who falls from a ladder, cracks his skull, and is presumed dead until, at his riotous wake, whiskey gets splashed on the corpse, which miraculously revives. It can also be read as "Finn Again Wakes," an allusion to Finn MacCool, the warrior giant of Irish mythology who sleeps in a cave deep beneath the earth but will awake to save Ireland in her hour of greatest need.

    The book is full of puns and riddles ("punns and reedles" to Joyce), words derived from more than 60 languages and dialects, and a lot of Shakespearean and classical allusions, along with references to popular songs, old jokes, and children's games. There are many humorous plays on words. St. Paul's First Epistle to the Hebrews, for instance, becomes "farced epistol to the highbruws." In one chapter there are more than 100 references to rivers around the world including one in "New Hunshire" called "The Merrymake."

    "I really enjoy the wordplay and the analyzing that we do," says Richard Cosma, 64, of Framingham, an early member of the group. Cosma's copy of the "Wake" is a ragged paperback with the date he started reading it penciled on the flyleaf: May 9, 1997. An engineer at a pharmaceutical company, he says he also likes that the book group's far-ranging discussions are "180 degrees from what I do during the day."

    Because of its density, Joyceans recommend reading it aloud and in a group with diverse backgrounds and knowledge, in order to get the most out of it. The sentence rhythms sometimes mimic songs, for one thing, and while a scholar might identify a Sanskrit word an avid fisherman would be the one to recognize the name of an obscure trout fly, an enthusiastic gardener an exotic plant.

    The pages the local group has most recently been reading include allusions to a prepubescent playground game in which boys try to guess the color of girls' underwear, apparent references to Galileo ("Galilleotto" ) and Machiavelli ("Smachiavelluti"), and a typical Joyce rewriting of a famous Shakespearian line: "For a burning would is come to dance inane."

    Joel Reisman, a Veterans Administration statistician from Newton, thinks too many "Finnegans Wake" readers get caught up in the details of its language and miss the narrative sweep of the book. "Every passage has its ambiguities, but this is still a story," he says.

    And not all of it is barely comprehensible. `About once a chapter Joyce writes clearly and lyrically and I love that," says Todd Sjoblom of Brookline, a computer programmer with a doctorate in linguistics.

    The group attracts serious readers. Sjoblom belongs to two other reading groups, and Cosma says he's usually working on three books at a time. He was initially drawn to the "Finnegans Wake" group, he recalls, "because I'd read almost everything else."

    Reisman joined the group only last December but has no problem keeping up. "The book is cyclical, so you can start anywhere," he says. Uniquely structured, "Finnegans Wake" begins with the last half of a sentence and ends with the first half of the same sentence. Joyce described it as "a Book of Doublends Jined."

    There are usually four or five people at a meeting, says Jespersen, "but we've had as many as 10." The group is currently all male, mostly in their 40s, but has included a few women.

    The group seems to be the only one of its kind meeting regularly in Massachusetts, possibly in all of New England. The Finnegans Wake Society of New York, founded before World War II, has links on its website to reading groups in Belgium, Switzerland, and Ireland but only to nine others in the United States outside of New York and Boston, most affiliated with colleges or universities.

    The New York society meets monthly at the Gotham Book Mart, a Manhattan literary landmark. "We usually get 20 to 30 people," says society president Murray Gross, a retired attorney. The society has been working on its present reading for more than eight years, Gross says, and is now on page 295. "When we're finished we'll start all over again and get it right," he jokes.

    Cosma says his group likes to meet in pubs since Joyce spent a lot of time in them, and in Cambridge or Somerville because they feel less conspicuous there. "We come from all around Boston, but this is a Cambridge kind of thing."

    The first meetings were in an Irish restaurant and bar near Porter Square in Cambridge actually called Finnegans Wake. "It was really wonderful to be reading "Finnegans Wake" in Finnegans Wake," remembers Jespersen. When Finnegans Wake closed, replaced by an Asian fusion restaurant, the book group had to move on and on. "It was hard to find a bar that would put up with people who were there to read, not drink," Cosma says. Lighting was also a problem. "One place was really dark to make it more romantic," he recalls, "and we had to tip the waitress to bring us a stronger bulb so we could see what we were reading."

    The Thirsty Scholar, where they now meet every Tuesday night from 7 to 9, has been more accommodating. The snug has adjustable lighting, and the management lets the group keep a large dictionary, essential for finding the meaning of Joyce's many arcane words, on a shelf by the bar. "You know you're dealing with hard-core Joyce guys when they keep a dictionary in their pub!" Cosma says.

    Since the "Wake" is a book that has no real beginning or end, the group doesn't anticipate ever dissolving. Asked if he thought it possible that 10 years from now the same people would still be meeting in a pub to deconstruct "Finnegans Wake," Sjoblom thought a moment and then smiled. "If not us," he said, "people very like us will be."



    From The Boston Globe - Author: William A. Davis, Globe Correspondent Date: April 25, 2006 Page: C1 Section: Living

    Deems
    May 1, 2006 - 04:49 pm
    Hi Chazz--Good of you to put the article here for us to read. My father loved puns; he loved making his own puns; I loved groaning at them. How he would have loved "a typical Joyce rewriting of a famous Shakespearian line: "For a burning would is come to dance inane."

    I'm not much of a Joyce fan myself, but this group and the reading aloud part with folks with all different backgrounds sounds like fun.

    Maryal

    Joan Pearson
    May 9, 2006 - 09:56 am
    "word by word, line by line, and page by page through 628 pages of "punnns and reedles!" I'm in...or if I can't make it up to Sommerville (Sommerville, Mass? I used to live there! That's your neighborhood. Are you in the group?) You know, we could do it right here in SN Books! Are you in, Chazz? I dare you... Well, wait a minute...can we substitute Ulysses for Finnegan's? I double dog dare you!

    ChazzW
    May 14, 2006 - 07:08 am
    Well, I have them both unread on my shelf, Joan. Heck, the list price of the Viking hard cover copy I have of Finnegan is $7.50 - so it's been around awhile. I don't have a good track record of promising participation though, but I'll keep a look out for either of these if they come around.

    Who knows what commodius vicus of recirculation might find me back at Howth Castle agin?

    Yers,
    Sir Tristam

    ellen c
    June 2, 2006 - 01:49 am
    Old Goriot by Honore de Balzac

    Joan Pearson
    June 2, 2006 - 05:33 am
    We couldn't go wrong with Balzac, Ellen! A great suggestion. Right now we are nearing the halfway mark in Cervantes' Don Quixote - when we are finished, we'll be ready for another vote.

    Right now we have James Joyce and Balzac on the table. Please do come back and join us in August - or better yet, drop in on the Quixote discussion, We would be happy to get you up to speed, There is even a woman from Spain, from La Mancha helping us through some of the translators' vagueries. Do come!

    Chazzz, are planning anything for Bloomsday this year?

    hats
    September 29, 2006 - 07:53 am
    Is Honore de Balzac's name on The Great Books list? His books look very interesting.

    gumtree
    November 1, 2006 - 09:58 pm
    Judy S The Balzac or the Conrad would be excellent for the next one here. I've read Heart of Darkness quite a few times and yet still have unfinished business with it. So imaginative - so dark. Cousin Bette quite different but dark too in its own way.

    hats
    November 2, 2006 - 10:06 am
    JoanP, glad you are back. I haven't made a nomination yet. Are the previous finalists counted again?

    Joan Pearson
    November 2, 2006 - 02:37 pm
    Here's an idea I'd like to run by you. In January, a discussion of Pamuk's Snow is scheduled. This is not a light read as you may be familiar with his My Name is Red.

    I have been listening to the discussion in the Book Nook recently - a newcomer has commented on our monthly offerings, preferring lighter reading. I'm wondering whether we should try to offer more of a choice. What do you think of this idea -

    We will vote as usual here for our next Great Books discussion, but instead of discussing it along with Snow in January, we do it in February or March instead?

    In the meantime, in January, we do something a bit lighter than Snow - but with some depth to it.
    Have you read Diane Setterfield's The Thirteenth Tale? A brand new book - Barnes and Noble had it for 30% off - I think it is being discussed on B&N University right now, not sure about that.

    The author is a former professor of French Lit - André Gide, I think. This is her first novel. It is gothic in the vein of Jane Eyre, Woman in White, Wuthering Heights, but it is difficult to say when it is set. I was hooked on it from the start, worried that it was going to get too magical in the early 19th century way...but the woman has a way with story-telling.

    She says that when an author uses the same symbol three times, it is to draw attention to it by the repetition. Diane Setterfield has mentioned Jane Eyre three times at least...more. If you haven't read this novel lately - or seen the movie, you might like to read Jane along with Setterfield's 19th Tale.

    What do you think? January, Thirteenth Tale and Jane Eyre and then in February or March we could do the newly elected title? It's up to you. I think it would be great fun and I think it might appeal to a wide range of readers.

    Here's a link to Barnes and Noble on the book - in case you are on the fence. The Thirteenth Tale

    I would love to know how you feel about reading Jane Eyre too!

    LauraD
    November 2, 2006 - 04:50 pm
    As some of you know, I participate in the Barnes and Noble on-line book discussions. They just unveiled a completely revamped area on their website that they are now calling Barnes and Noble Book Clubs.

    I am participating in their discussion of The Thirteenth Tale right now. The author should be joining the discussion any day now. She is supposed to be a part of it in November. Anyway, I really enjoyed the book. Several other classics are mentioned in the book, including The Woman in White, by Wilkie Collins. I have not read that book and was thinking of nominating it here for discussion, but didn't see it included on any of the lists.

    Bottom line, I like your idea, Joan.

    P.S. Most people have new screen names on the Barnes and Noble Book Clubs now, with the new format, so I am Fozzie over there, not LauraD.

    Joan Pearson
    November 3, 2006 - 09:57 pm
    Thanks for the recommendation, Laura. Will put Snow on my wish list.

    I've heard from others who like the idea of discussing The Thirteenth Tale and one of the 19th century Gothic novels in January. Personally, I'm all for reading Jane Eyre simply because D.Setterfield refers to it so often in her novels.

    But I'm thinking that it would be an advantage to the discussion of Thirteenth Tale to learn from those reading Wuthering Heights, Jane Eyre or Woman in White. The heroine of Setterfield's novels loved the gothic novels of this period. (Reading one of these Great Books would be optional of course.)

    Will get up a proposed discussion to see if there is a quorum for the The Thirteenth Tale - such a discussion shouldn't interfere with our vote here for our next Great Book adventure though - except to put it off another month.

    Is anyone interested in nominating one of the finalists from last time? Trollope anyone?

    Joan Pearson
    November 8, 2006 - 06:54 pm
    It appears that there is not sufficient interest to do The Thirteenth Tale in January (clink the link to learn more about Diane Setterfield's new novel) and so our Great Books vote will proceed for January. Would love to hear from you during the next two weeks before we vote! See the table above for the nominations to date.

    bluebird24
    November 8, 2006 - 09:42 pm
    we could try moby dick

    ellen c
    November 9, 2006 - 12:33 am
    count me in please - I am up for Bleak House, Cousin Bette and Heart of Darkness - all marvellous books so will join in whatever is selected looking forward to the journey ellen c

    kidsal
    November 9, 2006 - 01:56 am
    I am interested in Trollope or The Woman in White.

    gumtree
    November 9, 2006 - 07:47 am
    From those nominated Cousin Bette /Heart of Darkness would be my choices

    Joan, You mentioned Henry VI pt 1 - It too would be great but I think Mrs. Sherlock should have the honour of nominating it.

    What happened to the nomination from last time for Germinal?

    We really are spoiled for choice - a surfeit of riches, no less.

    Mippy
    November 9, 2006 - 09:52 am
    Trollope is the author I'd like to see chosen. I've read most of his work.
    But I'm wavering on which novel, as there are so many I really like.
    Which ones are suggested by others, or were previous nominations?
    Barchester Towers or another one would be fine.

    Moby Dick is highly overrated, IMHO, but there must be a reason it's a classic; I could not
    finish it when I tried to re-read it this past summer.

    LauraD
    November 9, 2006 - 10:23 am
    I would like to nominate The Woman in White, if I can. I could not find it on any of the lists though. Otherwise, I would be interested in Heart of Darkness.

    christymo
    November 9, 2006 - 01:37 pm
    Hello- I'm new to this board, but I lurked my way through the discussions of Middlemarch and Don Quixote, so have decided it's about time to participate. (I absolutely loved Middlemarch, by the way, and reading your discussion of it made it that much better. I had more of a mixed reaction to Don Quixote, but I certainly never would have started or made it through DQ without these message boards to keep me interested and moving forward.)

    With the possible exception of Moby Dick, which I forced myself to plow through once and really didn't enjoy, I would be interested in any of the suggestions so far... I have Barchester Towers, Woman in White, and Heart of Darkness on my shelves at home, all unread. I'd love to read any of them as part of this group.

    Christy

    Joan Pearson
    November 9, 2006 - 06:19 pm
    Christy! - you lurked through Don Quixote all those months!!! We're so very happy to hear that! Well, not that you lurked, but that you finished! And that you are brave enough to join us. A big Welcome!

    It seems that there is a growing consensus to read Wilkie Collins' Woman in White as a companion piece to Diane Setterfield's gothic novel...new gothic novel. We hope you will join the discussion of one or both of those two books - do visit this site to plan them - Proposed discussion of The Thirteenth Tale

    Laura, we really hope you come to the 13th Tale discussion - (Laura's taking part in the Barnes & Noble discussion of the book this month as she did in the B&N discussion of Matthew Pearl's Poe Shadow)

    Laura You can find Wilkie Collins'novels in Harold Bloom's The Western Canon - see link above. Scroll down to C. The Democratic Age - and then under Great Britain and you'll see three of his titles, The Moonstone; The Woman in White; No Name

    *************************************

    I know this is probabably confusing to some, but we're going to be voting here for a Great Books discussion to follow 13th Tale (and a Woman in White) - so will be adding all other nominations to the table above. The voted-for discussion will follow Thirteenth Tale in February, or possibly March. (bluebird, The Thirteenth Tale was just published in September 2006 - no wonder you don't know it!)

    Mippy, Judy, Babi, kidsal, will add Barchester Towers to the current nomination list right now.

    Ellen, will add Bleak House to the nominations too. thanks!

    Gum, I do remember a lot of talk about Zola's Germinal - was it actually nominated though? Do I hear a nomination from you?

    I can't wait to come in here - no telling what you all will come up with!

    joan roberts
    November 9, 2006 - 07:45 pm
    I would vote for Bleak House or Barchester Towers! I have Bleak House and enjoyed the BBC production, but really think I'd get even more out of the book. I read quite a bit of Trollope in my youth and would enjoy being reacquainted!

    I had to read Moby Dick for a course long ago and did not really enjoy it - all the details of killing and cutting up a whale really upset me.

    boookworm
    November 10, 2006 - 01:59 pm
    Probably shouldn't comment on the choice as it took me two weeks late to finish Don Q. Would love to read any of the books except Moby Dick--have never been able to get through all the killing. I especially like Zola. Would anyone be interested in The Red and The Black by Stendhal?

    Sheila

    Joan Pearson
    November 10, 2006 - 06:02 pm
    Oh please scroll down and read the comments by readers who have enjoyed The Red and the Black! Thanks for the nomination, Sheila!

    Laura, Christy, Marni, JoanR - looking forward to the vote! Nominations are still open...

    gumtree
    November 10, 2006 - 10:17 pm
    Thanks Boookworm -I'd be up for The Red and The Black - Stendhal is stunning!

    BaBi
    November 11, 2006 - 12:47 pm
    I read Stendhals "The Red and the Black" years...no, decades...ago. I remember enjoying it greatly, and other than that remember nothing else.

    I am not a fan of Joseph Conrad. I've read Bleak House twice and seen the movie twice. I think I'm about played out on that one. So far, my preferences would be 1) Trollope, or 2) Stendhal.

    Babi

    KleoP
    November 12, 2006 - 04:22 pm
    Oh, good, I love Stendhal. Anything is fine by me. I need to up my classics reading, as I have not been reading much lately in that area, except for modern classics (20th century).

    Kleo

    Joan Pearson
    November 12, 2006 - 07:07 pm
    You have to agree, if Stendhal is chosen, that we call it Le Rouge et le Noir - even while reading the English translation. This old French teacher has a hard time with Red and Black.

    gumtree
    November 12, 2006 - 10:10 pm
    Joan RED & BLACK has somehow stuck with me since my first reading when I was far too young for it. But if Le Rouge et le Noir is what it takes to read it here on SN then I don't mind humouring you.

    marni0308
    November 13, 2006 - 12:49 pm
    JoanP: I just discovered you used to be a French teacher! Wow! Golly, Le Rouge et Le Noir.....Well, I remember enough from my HS French to know what that means. But, Latin and French at the same time??? Uh, Oh! I would be in trouble!

    boookworm
    November 13, 2006 - 01:11 pm
    Yes, agree it should be Le Rouge et le Noir, although my French wouldn’t get me much beyond the title. Joan, would you ever consider doing a French class on Senior Net?

    Sheila

    Joan Pearson
    November 13, 2006 - 07:32 pm
    No,no, Marni, we'd read Stendhal in English IF it is voted in, but refer to the title as Le Rouge et le Noir - this reminds me of a wine, I think it's a Merlot we have at home. It's good - from France, from d'Oc - but the name of the wine is "Red Bicyclette." I find this quite amusing. If it was produced here in the US, I'd understand - but what were the French thinking?

    And then there's Balzac's, Cousin Bette - which in French would be Cousine Bette because Bette is feminine. But I'll let that one go by...

    Sheila - you would be interested in learning French onlne?

    Ann Freem
    November 14, 2006 - 07:45 am
    I feel hesitant to suggest a title, since I can't always participate; however, I suggest Heart of Darkness by Conrad. We are studying it in our post-colonial literature this year.

    christymo
    November 14, 2006 - 08:59 am
    I'd be up for Stendhal too. He's been on my "to read" list for a long time but I've never tried anything of his. Trollope is on that list too.

    I've read Bleak House several times, but I love Dickens enough that I could reread any of his books again and again.

    KleoP
    November 21, 2006 - 09:45 am
    It does sound more elegant in French, but I don't want to confuse people who may think we'll be reading it in French and they can't participate as they don't read French. Translating literature is a way to communicate something of importance and beauty between one language and another--it's proper to translate all of the work that can be translated, that includes communicating the title in the other language to people who will be reading it in the other language.

    Albert Lamorisse's Le ballon rouge is a brilliant little movie. I've seen it in French and English.

    Kleo

    ellen c
    November 30, 2006 - 01:24 am
    yes please count me in for Rouge & Noir if selected. would also like French lessons if offered

    Joan Pearson
    November 30, 2006 - 06:31 am
    Ellen, I suspect that by the time we finish the two Victorian gothic tales at the end of February, we might all be in the mood for the French nominees - Balzac and Stendhal.

    Hopefully you will join us in January in a discussion of Wilkie Collins' - Woman in White. This promises to be a lively discussion!

    kidsal
    December 2, 2006 - 02:52 am
    Hope to read Hester written by Margaret Oliphant. This writer was born about 1824 and wrote approximately 90 books to support her extended family. Catherine Vernon, jilted by her boyfriend, has risen to become head of the family bank - second only to Bank of England. Rules family with cynicism. Two people who resist her - Hester - a young relation with a strong personality, and Edward, Caterine's favorite. Review calls it a masterpiece of psychological realism, exploring difficult of understanding human nature, compulsive story of finanacial andsexual risk=taking that mounts to a searing climax.

    Joan Pearson
    December 4, 2006 - 03:52 pm
    kidsal, I haven't heard of the prolific Margaret Oliphant - 90 books! Please let us know what you think of it.

    Éloïse De Pelteau
    December 11, 2006 - 10:31 am
    I would love to read Le Rouge et le Noir or La Chartreuse de Parme by Stendhal, also someone mentioned once Symphonie Pastorale d'André Gide. Either one would be nice.

    hats
    January 5, 2007 - 01:47 pm
    Vanity Fair by Thackeray.

    bluebird24
    January 5, 2007 - 05:52 pm

    marni0308
    January 7, 2007 - 11:39 am
    I'm very interested in The Red and the Black by Stendhal. It was nominated and I had never heard of it. Yesterday I picked it up in B&N where it was sitting in the Classics paperback section. It looks so interesting! I bought it and will read it whether we choose it for our discussion or not.

    It's about Restoration France, a period I know nothing about but which sounds fascinating. A blurb on the back of the book says: "Stendhal paints a fascinating, multi-layered portrait of Julien Sorel, who endures as one of literature's most complex and surprisingly sympathetic characters - a would-be manipulator out of his depth in a sea of sharks."

    bluebird24
    January 7, 2007 - 06:19 pm

    BaBi
    January 8, 2007 - 06:40 am
    My own preference from the above list is still "Barchester Towers". Very much a period piece.

    Babi

    gumtree
    January 8, 2007 - 07:10 am
    I'll stick with Stendhal's The Red and the Black It really is a great read - so much content - will have us all talking our heads off.

    hats
    January 8, 2007 - 07:16 am
    I like Red and Black too, I think. Are we reading it in English? I hope so or I will have to go with another choice.

    marni0308
    January 8, 2007 - 11:06 am
    Hats: That's a good question. I would hope we're reading it in English, if it is selected. I suppose people who prefer could read it in French, though, if they have a French copy - as long as our discussion and examples are in English.

    I have a suggestion: Change the wording in our developing list above in the Header to The Red and the Black instead of Le Rouge et le Noir so it doesn't throw people off. (The paperback I bought has the title The Red and the Black.) Also, Stendhal's name has an H in it. Thanks!

    Joan Pearson
    January 8, 2007 - 04:09 pm
    Happy New Year, everyone! We'll vote in February, but please continue to nominate in here until then. Bluebird, we did Twain's Puddn'head Wilson a few years ago - and really enjoyed it. Your nomination has been entered.

    Oh, Hats! Of course we'd read Le Rouge et Le Noir in English! It seems to be a very popular selection in here - but wouldn't be if we read it in French!

    Scrawler
    January 17, 2007 - 11:03 am
    I'd like to nominate: "Moby Dick" by Melville but I also would like to second the motion for "Vanity Fair" by Thackeray.

    Joan Pearson
    January 17, 2007 - 01:06 pm
    Moby's already up there, and now Thackeray's Vanity Fair has been added. Thanks, Scrawler. Love his middle name - William Makepeace Thackeray. Would love to hear where it came from.

    Éloïse De Pelteau
    January 23, 2007 - 04:26 pm
    I am almost through reading Le Rouge et le Noir and if it was nominated I will certainly join in. I think that to get the most out of it, for those who are not fluent in French, is to read it in English and I am sure that a good translation is available because it has been a classic for a long time. I haven't looked for an English version yet but if it was nominated I would try to find one. This book is well worthwhile.

    bluebird24
    January 23, 2007 - 06:02 pm
    who wrote it?

    Joan Pearson
    January 23, 2007 - 06:10 pm
    Eloise, that's enough to get my vote!

    Bluebird, Le Rouge et Le Noir translates to "The Red and the Black." If you look up in the heading - you'll find a box which includes all of the nominated titles to date. If you click the title, you can read all about the book. Neat, huh?

    (Stendhal wrote this book in 1830.)

    Éloïse De Pelteau
    January 24, 2007 - 07:07 am
    If the Red and the Black is chosen, the translation should be of prime importance for a discussion because it is written in a Victorian style and digs deeply into the emotional and psychological nature of Stendhal's characters which he describes with a magic pen.

    Joan Pearson
    February 12, 2007 - 12:18 pm
    Éloïse, thank you for your high recommendation of Stendhal's The Red and the Black. If it is selected, we will pay close attention to the different translations available.

    Look for an announcement for the VOTE on Thursday - Feb.15...right here. In the meantime, check the heading for the nominated titles and see if there is anything else you would like to add for consideration.

    Can't wait!

    MrsSherlock
    February 12, 2007 - 06:48 pm
    The Red and the Black: My library has the Modern Library edition, translated by Scott-Moncrief, 1953. 349 pages.

    JoanK
    February 12, 2007 - 11:19 pm
    I've read them all except the Trollope, but some so long ago I've completely forgotten them. Haven't made up my mind yet.

    gumtree
    February 13, 2007 - 07:20 am
    Joan P Thanks for the wake up call. The current list comes down to three for me - Heart of Darkness, Cousin Bette and Le Rouge et Le Noir. Any one will be fine by me but I'm still leaning towards the Stendhal. How in the world I think I can find time for the discussion is quite a mystery...I keep hoping for those 'windows of opportunity' but when they're open I'm generally out the door going somewhere else...

    hats
    February 13, 2007 - 07:57 am
    After reading this synopsis, I am glad Eloise mentioned Red and Black. I really want to read it. Gumtree, I agree with you. I am leaning the same way.

    Le Rouge et Le Noir

    Joan Pearson
    February 13, 2007 - 10:52 am
    We'll have a Survey Monkey vote set up here on Thursday - I hope you can make it here. We'll leave it open through the weekend to be sure to get everyone counted.

    If you look at the table above you might be interested to know that the nominated Book Titles are links to summaries of the books -

    See you here on Thursday. weather permitting. - Are you having a weather event where you are?

    hats
    February 13, 2007 - 10:55 am
    Whoops! I didn't need to make a link. Sorry. We are overcast with rain or snow flurries for tomorrow.

    Judy Shernock
    February 13, 2007 - 04:51 pm
    In my public schools in New York we read Tom Sawyer in 7th grade: Moby Dick in 10th grade and The Red and the Black in 11th grade.

    In this discussion I'm hoping to read something not meant for High School (Even though the aforementioned are all wonderful and important books).

    Personally I hope for books I have never attempted on my own like Heart of Darkness or Aunt Bette. Both are masterpieces and are perhaps more complex in their ideas.

    Judy

    MrsSherlock
    February 13, 2007 - 08:54 pm
    Barchester Towers is very funny in a wry sort of way. I woulsn't mind reading it again. Le Rouge et le Noir is most appealing because I know nothing about it. The others I've either read them long ago or am not interested in reading them now.

    Joan Pearson
    February 15, 2007 - 09:34 am
    SEE THE LINK IN THE HEADING ABOVE. I'm really interested to see how this vote goes. We may have to have a run-off vote if the first is too close to call. That's what happened last time when we had so many nominations!

    ps. No matter which one wins, we hope you will join us in the discussion! It's amazing what you all bring to the table in these discussions - even if you've read the book before. I know that most of what I read in high school went right over my head - no life experience!

    Joan Pearson
    February 15, 2007 - 11:50 am
    ps - let me know if you have any trouble with the vote - just post here, okay?

    Joan Pearson
    February 19, 2007 - 06:20 am
    The polls are open until midnight tonight - it seems we have a winner, but it is veeerrry close. If you've been putting off your vote, now is the time!

    Joan Pearson
    February 20, 2007 - 06:14 am
    Stendhal's The Red and the Black!

    The Red and the Black (Le Rouge et Le Noir) turned out to be a clear winner after yesterday's votes came in. I can't be happier about that! (Remember the Middlemarch vote? Three times!) Stendhal was the author's pen name -
    Marie-Henri Beyle (January 23, 1783 – March 23, 1842), better known by his penname Stendhal, was a 19th century French writer. He is known for his acute analysis of his characters' psychology and for the dryness of his writing-style. He is considered one of the foremost and earliest practitioners of the realistic form, and his most famous novels are Le Rouge et le Noir (The Red and the Black, 1830) and La Chartreuse de Parme (The Charterhouse of Parma, 1839).


    Thank you all for your participation! I'm really looking forward to this discussion! Eloise promises to be with us - and hopefully Maryal will be out from under her mountain of papers and join us in this adventure. It will be interesting to read a 19th century French novel, steeped as we are in the British of this period.

    Now all we have to do is look over the different translations (and font SIZES) - open a new discussion - and set the date.

    "Laissez les bons temps rouler!"

    gumtree
    February 20, 2007 - 06:35 am
    What great news - Le Rouge et le Noir -

    I have a copy of the Norton Critical Edition translated by Robert M Adams, 1969. The print is not all that easy to read but the essays are worth the effort. But if it is decided to read a particular translation I'll be happy to get one...begged, borrowed or bought.

    I hope not to be so much of a lurker for this one...so please count me in.

    Éloïse De Pelteau
    February 20, 2007 - 07:48 am
    I am happy that The Red and the Black is chosen, I will certainly participate. How many translations are there? It seems that there are several. I hope to find an English translation in used book stores in Montreal, or I will order it from B & N.

    marni0308
    February 20, 2007 - 12:25 pm
    Hurray! That was the book I was hoping for! I bought it this winter looking for an interesting classic that I had never read. I bought a paperback from B&N - just walked into the store, saw it on a shelf of classic books near the front of the store and grabbed it. I don't know which version - have to go check.....

    ....Barnes & Noble Classics, translated by Horace B. Samuel, with an Intro and Notes by Bruce Robbins. The print does not seem too small. It's a good sized book - 532 pages.

    MrsSherlock
    February 20, 2007 - 05:33 pm
    I am pleased, also. What came in second?

    kidsal
    February 21, 2007 - 01:43 am
    OK - wil get a copy.

    hats
    February 21, 2007 - 03:07 am
    Mrs. Sherlock, I would like to know what came in second too.

    BaBi
    February 21, 2007 - 06:37 am
    And when do you think the Stendhal discussion will be scheduled?

    Babi

    Scrawler
    February 21, 2007 - 08:24 am
    OK I'm in. I ordered my book yesterday.

    Joan Pearson
    February 21, 2007 - 09:54 am
    Well, let's see. A nominee from last time came in second this time - Trollop's Barchester Towers (third time the charm?)- followed by Dicken's Bleak House in third place. What was interesting - Cousin Bette had only 2 first place votes - but ran away with second choice! Won't count out Balzac for next time either.

    Babi, we'll go ahead and schedule Red and Black for April 1. Island in the Center of the World will begin on March 15 - I plan to participate in that one too After conferring with those in Island, the majority would prefer the overlap, rather than put off Red to a later date. We won't move too quickly in either book - especially at the start of Red and Black so it should work out.

    So, I'll put the April 1 start date in the Header here and then get working on the new discussion site.

    Joan Pearson
    February 21, 2007 - 09:57 am
    Next we need to talk about which translation to read. The font size is important with us - and the readability of the translation is very important. To tell the truth, I always enjoy comparing the different translations but I have heard that some of the older ones do not get very high marks -
    "The famous C.K. Scott Moncrieff translation for Modern Library was first published in 1926. Margaret R.B. Shaw's 1953 translation for Penguin reads like a translation of an 18th century novel."
    Scrawler - so happy you will be with us in the 19th century again. Which translation did you order? I intend to go to Barnes&Noble this afternoon - and to my library to look them over. Kidsal, glad you will join us too!. Let us know what you ordered - and why did you choose it, okay?

    Here's what we have so far:
    * Barnes & Noble Classics, translated by Horace B. Samuel, with an Intro and Notes by Bruce Robbins. The print does not seem too small. It's a good sized book - 532 pages. (Happy to have you with us, Marni! Promise to go slowly!)

  • Norton Critical Edition translated by Robert M Adams, 1969. The print is not all that easy to read but the essays are worth the effort. (Yes! Gum will be with us!)

  • New Translation by Burton Raffel - this translation seems to be the rage. Mippy writes that her Raffel copy came yesterday. Happy that Mippy plans to join us - another from Island in the Center. Will let you know what she says about the size of the font. A review I read about the Raffel -
    "The new translation by Burton Raffel rocks. Or, more precisely, it's a blast, which is exactly how Raffel (a distinguished professor of humanities at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette who has also dragged Balzac's old warhorse, Père Goriot, kicking and screaming into the 21st century)"
    The Norton Critical Edition for Don Quixote was Raffel's. I was put off by his attempts to "drag Don Quixote" into the 21st century - putting idioms into the Don's mouth that Cervantes never wrote. We had Amparo with us, reading in Cervante's Spanish - and she would let us know when Raffel took such liberties.

    This time, we'll have Eloise with us - reading the French and the English. Raffel won't slip much by us in his effort to modernize Stendhal. I've heard that he captures Stendhal's spirited expression - so that's a real plus.
  • Éloïse De Pelteau
    February 21, 2007 - 12:14 pm
    Joan P, please don't expect too much from me, I am not Amparo. I am by far much less schooled than all of you but I do love good literature and The Red and the Black is great. I am usually very disappointed by most translations. Raffel would probably irritate me if he doesn't respect the author's true meaning. I don't even know if I SHOULD buy an English version seeing that everybody might get a different one. Unless the translator has lived a long time in the country the book is translated into and speaks the language fluently he would miss some subtlety in exquisite sentences that are practically impossible to detect.

    This scares me. "The new translation by Burton Raffel rocks. Or, more precisely, it's a blast, which is exactly how Raffel (a distinguished professor of humanities at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette who has also dragged Balzac's old warhorse, Père Goriot, kicking and screaming into the 21st century)" Rocks?, a blast? "Kicking and screaming"? No, you can't do that, it would spoil it. It is does not belong in the 21st century. I wish we had Traude on this one, I will email her.

    I am anxious to start now, it promises to be a great discussion with so many interesting participants.

    Joan Grimes
    February 21, 2007 - 04:15 pm
    wish that I could get the book on cd but cannot find one. I did find a DVD of it. I may order that but that would not qualify me to be a par t of the discussion.

    So I guess that I will just read your discussion of the book. I read it along time ago.

    Joan Grimes

    patwest
    February 21, 2007 - 04:28 pm
    Joan G Here is a link that I found and I think I may thry it.

    Click here

    MrsSherlock
    February 21, 2007 - 05:16 pm
    The Scott-Moncrief translation from my library has illustrations by Rafaello Busoni. The print is quite nice, black and not small. Nine-page intro by Hamilton Basso. Text is 450 pages, including the illustrations which are 1/3 page.

    MrsSherlock
    February 21, 2007 - 05:17 pm
    PS: Whatever translation the group decides upon is OK; I will get it at Alibris or where ever I can find it.

    Joan Pearson
    February 21, 2007 - 05:32 pm
    Eloise, what Amparo brought to the Cervantes discussion was a love for Don Quixote and the fact that she was reading Cervantes' Spanish words.

    From everything you have said about The Red and the Black, we know that you very much admire Stendhal's work - and you can also read his French. Your participation is invaluable.

    The Raffel translation is said to be highly spirited - it "rocks" in a way that Stendhal must have rocked when it appeared in 1830. We can always turn to you when we think Raffel has gone overboard in his interpretation.

    I'll add here that I was a French major - probably read Red and Black as a requirement. This was 50 years ago. I never appreciated anything I had to read for a grade. I also have a memory like a sieve. It will be first time for me - but I think I'll keep a French copy at one side, just for the fun of it.

    JoanG - how long ago did you read the book? PatW - I think the audio version sounds great! 18 hours of listening! Wow!

    Jackie, when was the Scott-Moncrief translation published? How large are the pages? Nice large dark type - with illustrations, only 420 pages! Wow! I'd love to get my hands on that one!

    Mippy
    February 21, 2007 - 05:55 pm
    Just to let everyone know that the print in the Raffel version is a comfortable size.

    The good news is the price for this hardback from B&N: $5.98 !

    hats
    February 22, 2007 - 03:50 am
    Wow! Thank you, JoanP and Mippy. I am going to order from Barnes and Noble. Hope that is the right thing to do. I love hardcovers. I don't know why.

    Eloise I am so glad you are going to be here. JoanP is right. You are going to be invaluable. I am looking forward to being here with you and the other posters.

    gumtree
    February 22, 2007 - 07:53 am
    Such a happy and spirited start to the pre-pre-discussion - It's a privilege to be with so many talented folk, and I'm so glad to be joining you all again.

    Éloïse De Pelteau
    February 22, 2007 - 08:21 am
    Joan, art is meant to shock and I am sure Standhal shocked proper society of the time. So did Balzac who to me has a bit less scope than Standhal. By-the-way last Sunday I watched an extremely good two-part movie about the life of Balzac played by this French icon Gérard Depardieu and both his son and daughter have parts in it. It is extremely well done. The adaptation was excellent using mostly Balzac's prose. We will see part 2 next Sunday, I can't wait.

    Is there an adaptation in modern English of W. Shakespeare? That I would like to read because I can't understand WS at all.

    Thank you Hats, I am happy that we will be in this together.

    Joan, I think I wouldn't have liked The R and the B when I was young, the action is too slow and the literature too long.

    Joan Grimes, if you could get a CD I am sure you would love it. I never tried audio books because they are so expensive here and rare.

    Nobody is invaluable JoanP and Hats, me especially but thanks just the same.

    glencora
    February 22, 2007 - 06:43 pm
    I am new to this cite and this is the first time I am going to be participating in a book discussion. The Red and the Black has been on my "to read" list for a long time - so I am really looking forward to it. Has it been decided which translation everyone will be reading - or does it not matter if everyone has the same translation? Also, how long does a discussion on one book usually last? Thanks.

    JoanK
    February 22, 2007 - 07:37 pm
    GLENCORA: welcome, welcome!! I think once you do one discussion, you'll want to do more.

    Most of the book discussions last for a month. But the Great Books ones are usually longer -- the books are bigger and "meatier". JoanP will tell us, dividing up the book into chunks that make a reasonable amount to read each week, depending on the material. We have one discussion ("Rembrandt's Eyes") that reads only 10 pages a week. Others read much more. Click on "Books and Literature" above to see if any of our other discussions interest you.

    The discussions are 24/7. Come in whenever you feel like it, read whatever has been posted since you were last here, and post if you want. If you have any questions on how to use the site, just ask.

    Translations? Are we ready to decide, Joan?

    gumtree
    February 22, 2007 - 07:45 pm
    Glencora Hello and Welcome. Hope you enjoy Seniornet Books as much as I do. There is just so much going on - the discussions are pertinent and insightful and above all Fun

    For now, I'll leave your questions to be answered by the one who knows the answers, namely, Joan P (Our Discussion Leader Extraordinaire!) -

    gumtree
    February 22, 2007 - 07:49 pm
    JoanK I guess we were posting almost together...It looks like you know all the answers too.

    Joan Pearson
    February 22, 2007 - 08:04 pm
    Hello there, Glencora! Some of you may recognize our newest Seniornetter from her first appearance in the Book Nook last pm. Glencora read about us in the March/April edition of Bookmarks Magazine. Have you been able to find a copy of this nifty magazine in a Barnes & Noble or Borders yet? If not, here's a peek at the two page article Glencora read before coming in. Bookmarks Article
    Welcome, Glencora

    You ask the question we've been asking since yesterday - which translation shall we read. It appears that we will have a number of them going at once - plus our French-speaking Eloise who will let us know exactly what Stendhal wrote.

    Today I went to the library and brought home two translations - C. Scott Moncrieff and Burton Raffel's. (I had intended to stop in Barnes & Noble too, but the wind was blowing so hard, I got scared. I saw a wood sign fly off a storefront and wanted to get home fast. Hopefully tomorrow I will get to B&N to look at the Raffel copy spoken of here.

    I've been reading the first chapter of each - about the pretty little town of Verrières (fictionalized town, thinly described Grenoble) made rich by those Mulhouse prints. After the first chapter, about the only difference I can see is that the Raffel is easier to read - more white space, not so scrunched together. Neither has the Rafaello Busoni prints Marni has! Maybe B&N has something like that. I had hoped the library would.

    How long will this discussion last. Hmmm let's see. I think the answer is - that Great Books discussions go slower than others - they last as long as we/you want it to. We took four months on Don Quixote. Or was it more than that? Le Rouge et Le Noir is also in two Volumes - 75 chapters altogether. (very short chapters - 4 -5 pages each. If we take 10 chapters a week, that's about 50 pages or so, we could conceivably finish in two months. When we go slowly, that leaves time to read other books, participate in other discussions even. I intend to take part in the Island at the Center of the World which begins on March 15 and continue while this is going on. I hope this hasn't overwhelmed, confused, or scared you. We really have a good time in the Great Books adventures - don't want to get bogged down, but don't want to lose the spirit of the novel either. We'll see how it goes. Just speak up if you feel we need to readjust the reading schedule.

    Eloise, do you know if Balzac and Stendhal were friends? It was interesting to read of the close relationship between Wilkie Collins and Dickens back in the Woman in White discussion. Balzac and Stendhal must have known one another, writing at the same time in Paris, no?

    Gum, Hats - it's great to see you both here! Once we get past the opening chapters and accustomed to Stendhal's style, this is going to be great fun! I admit it takes a bit getting into the story. I was immediately drawn to the author and by extension to the protagonist, Julien Sorel, when I learned that he lost his mother at the young age of seven. Such loss defines who you become - I know, it happened to me. Same age.

    Oops - I see JoanK here - and Gum too. We were all posting together! Good evening, ladies! Thank you for welcoming Glencora! We are all delighted she found us through the magazine article.

    MrsSherlock
    February 22, 2007 - 11:24 pm
    Joan: My library copy of the Scott-Moncrief has only 420 pages. the translation is copyright 1926 and "The special contents of this edition are copyright 1947...". Skimming the intro I see no mention of abridgement but I can't understand why this edition has fewer pages.

    Éloïse De Pelteau
    February 23, 2007 - 08:31 am
    I wish I only could get my hands on one of the translations and really get the feel of it, but I don't go that far out from my house in the terrible weather with wind and -15 celcius (about 0 F) very often, driving downtown is not fun either. So when I go I will look for a translation and scan it.

    Joan P, I read Balzac's biography by Henri Troyat in French and he respected Standhal, whom the government had honored by appointing "consul de Trieste" whatever that is, and Balzac wrote of Standhal: "M. Beyle wrote a book where the sublime explode from chapter to chapter", the book is "La Chartreuse de Parme". Balzac said that Victor Hugo was: "The greatest poet of the 19th century".

    Last night at my sister's house we saw Balzac's "Cousin Bette", an American adaptation. I have the book, but I won't read it. Balzac writes beautifully about vengeance and how to achieve it destrying many lives in the process. No, I don't enjoy that. I can understand why after reading his biography.

    Standhal's writing is sublime, it touches the heart and soul.

    hats
    February 23, 2007 - 08:59 am
    Eloise, what a beautiful description of Stendhal's writing. I hope the Raffel translation doesn't lose the beauty of his words in translation. I can't wait to hear JoanP's opinion. I think she is looking at two translations. I have already ordered the Raffel.

    Scrawler
    February 23, 2007 - 09:05 am
    I got the Penguin Classic of "The Red and the Black." I have much success with all the Penguin Classics I have bought through the years. The print is good and the binding is also good. I buy most of my classics with the idea that I will keep them for awhile, so to me binding and print are important.

    The Library of America also has good binding and printing, but I'm not sure that they have "The Red and the Black." I would steer away from the cheaper copies because the binding doesn't last and also the book itself may not be close to the original. Anything stating that they are going to drag me kicking and screaming into the 21st is not for me.

    Each century has to me there own unique features to it and that's what I look for in reading the classics. I no more want a Julien Sorel dressed in black leather and tight jeans and smoking a cigarette than I would want a character from one of the 21st books looking like he just stepped out of the 19th century.

    My Penguin Classic is translated by Roger Gard and here's what the flyleaf has to say about the translation: "Roger Gard's fine translation remains faithful to the natural, conversational tone of the original, while his introduction elucidates the complexities of Julien's character. This edition also contains a chronology, further reading and an appendix on Stendhal's use of epigraphs."

    "Roger Gard was educated as Abbotsholme School, Derbyshire, and at Corpus Christi College, Cambridge. Before his death in 2000 he was Emeritus Reader in English at Queen Mary and Westfield College, University of London. Among his publications are books on Henry James, Jane Austen and the teaching of fiction in schools. He also translated Alfred de Vigny's "The servitude and Grandeur of Arms," and edited Henry James's "A Landscape Painter and Other Tales, The Jolly Corner and Other Tales" and a selection of his literary criticism, "The Critical Muse," for Penguin Classics."

    hats
    February 23, 2007 - 09:16 am
    Well, I am not going to get stressed out about the translations. We can compare the differences in translations. Right? Scrawler, I do like Penguin books too. I feel safe with the little penguin on the binding. Anyway, here is a quote from Powells book site about the Raffel translation.

    "Raffel restores to Stendhal the quality that, in the words of V.S. Pritchett, makes "each sentence of his plain prose" read like "a separate shock."

    Comparison between Moncrieff and Raffel

    The comparison between the two translators begins far down in the thirteenth paragraph. I might have counted the paragraphs wrong.

    MrsSherlock
    February 23, 2007 - 11:16 am
    Hats: What a revealing comparison. I've already decided that the Moncrief version is not the one I want to read. Seems the Raffel version captures the essence without the excessive wordiness typical of writers of that age.

    Éloïse De Pelteau
    February 23, 2007 - 12:51 pm
    Hats, Thanks for the link. The article tells it exactly as it is. Moncrieff writes like it was the fashion in the 19th century and Raffel translated it for today's modern readers. We can always compare, the story will carry us forward regardless of the translation I think.

    glencora
    February 23, 2007 - 06:00 pm
    Hats. Thank you for the link - the article was interesting and I hadn't looked at Powells webcite before - so I was glad to be connected to it.

    However, the article totally turned me off to the Raffel translation. I was stunned that a serious translator would insert an anachronistic phrase like "I'll tell you . . . the story of my life. It's a blast" into a translation of a 19th century classic. I don't think there is any problem with a translator making the language of a book more accessible to modern day readers. But one of the main joys for me of reading a book from another time (or place) is the sense of the period that comes through in the use of the language - the poetry of the language, To put "it's a blast" into the mouth of someone from another culture gives me the chills. (Not to mention the fact that the phrase "it's a blast" is itself a passe phrase from the 60s - 70s. A translator today might say "It's awesome").

    I'm not sure about the Moncrieff translation either at this point. I actually did not think a translator would be part of my decision in buying the book - but now I see that it is.

    I would love to hear what others have to say.

    MrsSherlock
    February 23, 2007 - 07:05 pm
    Glencora: Good points. Now I'm confused. Moncrief looks good but why is it so short?

    Éloïse De Pelteau
    February 23, 2007 - 09:38 pm
    Mrs Sherlock, My 1959 French edition has only 400 pages.

    I found the online Moncrieff translation and I have been able to compared word for word the first two or three pages and found it reflected the original text accurately. I will be able to follow the discussion with both versions this way.

    If I could find an online Raffel translation it would be great to compare with the Moncrieff.

    gumtree
    February 23, 2007 - 11:51 pm
    JoanP Bless you for the link to Bookmarks article - can't get it here and by the time I've subscribed and they've processed it and sent it halfway around the world - well I'll be much older. Great Article, Ginny and Jane should be feted by Seniornetters everwhere! Such a straightforward and honest presentation can only have a positive result. WOW!

    Eloise You asked about Modern English Shakespeare - I have seen student editions of individual plays with original text on left page and corresponding modern English text on left. Sorry I don't have details as to publishers etc. All this means is that they are around somewhere - Good Luck.

    I'm glad you'll be along for R & B and helping with language oddities. And yes Stendhal is truly sublime, once read, his work lives within you.

    Hats Great link - thanks for putting it up. I have the Robert M Adams 1969 translation which was my first adult visit to Stendhal so it's dear to my heart but I'm always ready to update and just have to decide what to go for. Will probably read a couple side by side and then the discussion will no doubt amplify the text by bringing in others. How lucky we are to have each other here on SN

    Glencora Welcome again like-minded friend. I'm not too keen on Raffel myself - I didn't like his translation of Don Quixote - I guess he thought it was 'a blast' but for me,not so. Part of the charm of these classic pieces is the element of the past conveyed by the language and the evocative feeling of period it gives. This will be a super discussion - hopefully we will go slowly with so much content to talk about.

    hats
    February 24, 2007 - 04:28 am
    Glencora and All, I respect all of your opinions. I know nothing about translations, nothing. I always like to hear from JoanP and/or Maryal. This time I became impulsive. Not because of the words "blast" or "rock," I became excited over Barnes and Nobles good price, $5.98. I thought the book might sell out.

    Glencora, I definitely agree with you. When reading a classic or any period book, I love the beauty or "poetry" of the words. When words are beautifully put together, I truly get goose pimples. Plus, I do not want to sacrifice the period or era in which the people lived by using the simplistic cliches some people might use today in order to make the reader understand the time and the people.

    I am waiting patiently for JoanP. I might have wasted $5.98. That is alright. As long as I enjoy Stendhal as much as Eloise which is really impossible because Eloise speaks and writes beautiful French then, I have had the best of two worlds, Stendhal's world and my world, the twenty first century.

    Glencora, don't worry. The Seniornet Discussion Leaders along with Eloise and other posters will do intellectual magic here while reading Red and Black. You will have an unforgettable experience.

    bbcesana
    February 24, 2007 - 06:57 am
    Is it important which translation we get,

    I was browsing and there was a wide variation in the translations.

    ALF
    February 24, 2007 - 07:14 am
    You and I will be fretting together over in the corner. I, too, bought the $5.98 deal.

    hats
    February 24, 2007 - 08:23 am
    Alf, I love the word "deal."

    glencora
    February 24, 2007 - 09:24 am
    Hats. I don't think it really matters which translation we all have - it may make the discussion even more interesting if we have differing translations.

    I really wanted to thank you for making me aware of the Powells.com site. I just signed up for the review-a-day and I'm having a good time exploring all the interesting features.

    Scrawler
    February 24, 2007 - 10:19 am
    Translation:

    "...no attempt has been made to pretend that this is a book of modern English prose.

    Reading inevitably involves more or less active interpretation by the reader; and a translation is a stronger act of interpretation because its results will coerce subsequent readers. It must interpret, and limit, at the basic level: words, ordinary words, like "bien" for example, often do not have one single, simple, 'faithful' meaning. Choices between the feeling, nuance and emphasis of a series of synonyms in a particular context, or between varying syntactical structures, etc., have to be made sentence after sentence - and the reader ignorant of the original language is thus shut off from the hovering possibilities and alternatives that might suggest themselves to someone who knows the language.

    In an ideal world the translator would be one who was conscious of this, and who was also native in both French and English, loved and understood Stendhal, was steeped in the literature of both countries in the early nineteenth century, had the ear and the gift of pastiche, and an active conscience.

    However, in the absence of most of these qualities, I have acted on my impression that one of the pleasures in reading the translation of a classic, comes from hearing behind it the ghost of the original language. Probably the best model of an appropriate English manner is not a translation at all, but Robert Louis Stevenson's very subtly French narrator in his unfinished novel about a French adventurer in England, "St. Ives" (1897).

    So, when given the choice, I have lent towards a fairly literal, hard rendering of Stendhal's syntax and vocabulary, keeping close to the somewhat informal and conversational tone of the original while nevertheless, I hope, making the sense lively enough, and natural. 'Naturalness in manner and speech' was Stendhal's professed ideal, as opposed, perhaps, to the cultivation of a fine style. And in contrast to most modern translation, I have kept to the original, French, method of marking off speech and internal speech. Stendhal very occasionally uses inverted commas when a phrase already in the text is repeated or cited from the past, but that is his only use of them. To indicate the beginning of a speech said out loud a dash - is used, most usually at the start of a new paragraph: otherwise he relied on one's sense of what is going on, plus the repeated use of prompt phrases such as 'he said to himself', etc., bounded by commas. I have followed this exactly, with the addition of one or two dashes.

    It might be expected that the result would confuse a modern reader of English by its density and unfamiliarity, but the effect is in practice, I think, to produce a swifter, less formal narrative flow which easily engages the reader's active collaboration because it refrains from breaking up the rhythm and tidying up the text with constant quotation marks (which would tend to enforce a tiny pause on each, frequent, occasion). Also the text looks more authentic.

    The same feeling has led me to stick, on the whole, and when they are easily comprehensible to the English reader, to the original titles and honorifices, etc. - Comte, Duc, Abbe, and so on - though sometimes it has seemed preferable to translate them. ~ "Notes on the Text and Translation" from "The Red and the Black"

    MrsSherlock
    February 24, 2007 - 11:35 am
    I'm leaning towards this translation. Maybe I'll keep the Moncrief, also.

    Joan Pearson
    February 24, 2007 - 01:16 pm
    Glencora, it seems there is no simple answer to your question as you are seeing here. What's key is that you read one that works for you. If the font is too small, it doesn't matter how beautifully written it is. If it is too dry that you lose interest - it is time to hop off to the library for a different translation. If it is too irritatingly contemporary (I don't think you'll find Julien in jeans and a leather jacket in Raffel, I really don't) then back to the library you go. Just don't give up. You'll find plenty of help here.

    As far as I can tell, there are two extremes in the translations. (It's probably even more complicated than that. The real problem is that many of the translations have gone out of print. My local Barnes & Noble had NO copies of the book! Borders had four.

    1. The most widely available is Burton Raffel's, the very contemporary one. The advantage of this translation is that it is very accessible to the modern reader. I read the first chapter only and see nothing that offends - but did suffer at times in his translation of Don Quixote. His translation of Don Q. was the Norton Critical edition. But I continued to use it...checking in with other translations and our Spanish contributor, Amparo, who kept us informed of the exact Spanish translation. It worked out fine.

    As Jackie quotes - Jackie I'm not sure why you have 420 pages. Are they large pages? Make sure you have both Volume I and Volume II. Some of the translations were published in two separate translations.

    2. C. Scott The Montcrieff was all the rage in the past - "Moncrieff writes like it was the fashion in the 19th century" - Eloise - which it was. We just read Woman in White - we read Middlemarch - 19th century novels. Did we have a hard time with it? I lust after the library copy Marni has - with the Rafaello Busoni prints. Out of print - a rare bird. I may have to buy it used on line just for those prints! (Bruce says that's ridiculous as I have the library edition (sans prints) right in front of me.

    3 Marni - it is you with the prints, isn't it? Do you have the Barnes & Noble Classics too - the Horace Small translation?

    4. Scrawler has the Roger Gard translation - Penguin - "Roger Gard's fine translation remains faithful to the natural, conversational tone of the original, while his introduction elucidates the complexities of Julien's character." I hunted in bookstores and library for that one, couldn't find it. If YOU can find it, I don't think you can go wrong with that one.

    5. The Oxford Classic translated by Catherine Slater in 1946. I love her writing style - a light engaging touch - after reading her introduction and the first chapter of the book. One drawback is the tiny font - but it is printed on heavy paper in dark print. 526 pages - paperback. I wonder if a hardcover can be found with larger print.

    6. the Norton Critical Edition - Robert Adams' translation - I like this one simply because of the extensive notes, the footnotes. BUT, as Gum says -the type is rather small - not all that easy to read. You'll need your reading glasses on! I bought it for the footnotes - but I'll share them with you - all of them

    JoanK
    February 24, 2007 - 01:27 pm
    I found the font an issue with Middlemarch. although I usually buy online, I think this time, I'll go to the store and look.

    I liked the Raffel translation of DQ, although it was jarring at times.

    Éloïse De Pelteau
    February 24, 2007 - 02:36 pm
    Scrawler, I totally agree with the quote in #964.

    HERE is the complete online text of the Moncrieff's translation of The Red and the Black by Standhel. I put it in my favorites. The chapters are short and easily located when someone wants to discuss a sentence or an idea. We still have a lot of time before we begin and as I already have read the book I concentrate on reading other books that I have not read yet.

    MrsSherlock
    February 24, 2007 - 05:35 pm
    Scrawler: How is the font size in the Gard? My library Moncrief, the one with the illustrations, is very nice, dark, about a size 12 in Times. Checking Amazon I found a copy for $1.00 so I've ordered it. Heritage Press, 1947 edition.

    hats
    February 25, 2007 - 06:39 am
    Eloise, thank you for the link. Scrawler, I do like Penguin. My mind totally forgot about Penguin. Usually, the print is a nice size. Size of print is very important for me. So, I am going to think about getting a Penguin too. The Raffel is on the way.

    Scrawler
    February 25, 2007 - 10:21 am
    I got my Penguin Classic at amazon.com for about $9.00. The font is about the size you find in most paperback books of that price. Not as small as the paperbacks that sell for $5.00 or more. It is 532 pages long and also includes an appendix (Stendhal's Epigraphs. and Quotations) and appendix B: French Currency and Distances in the 1820s as well as the author's notes.

    Also included are Chronology of the life of Henri Marie Beyle [Stendhal], Introduction, Selected further reading, and Notes on the text and translation. I have always found these very interesting and helpful while reading other novels.

    One reason I have enjoyed Penguin Classics is that in other books they have also included the original pen and ink drawings.

    Joan Pearson
    February 25, 2007 - 11:14 am
    Scrawler, does your Penguin edition have pen and ink drawings? The Rafaello Busoni drawings didn't appear until the 20th century if I'm not mistaken. Would love earlier ones - "originals." I wonder if there isn't a French translation on line that has the drawings?

    bmcinnis
    February 25, 2007 - 01:41 pm
    Joan, Thanks for the note about this being the March choice. For me, this novel is a memory too far back to even remember how I felt about it. What's more fun though, is the dialogue among us. Your questions are always a challenge I enjoy along with learning others' points of view.

    Since I missed it, I have begun "The Woman in White" and will take the opportunity to at least review what the group had to say.

    Next week is our "spring" break, hardly that, with it snowing here today. What a strange winter we've had.

    http://us.penguingroup.com/static/rguides/us/red_and_black.html This is an interesting set of questions. Bern

    Scrawler
    February 26, 2007 - 11:27 am
    I'm sorry if I miss-lead you. My Penguin edition of "The Red and the Black" does not have illustrations. I was referring to "other" books I've read published by Penguin that have had original drawings such as the Charles Dickens novels.

    marni0308
    February 26, 2007 - 12:44 pm
    JoanP: No, it's not me with the illustrations. I just have a B&N paperback - can't remember which version. I'm sticking with it.

    Joan Pearson
    February 26, 2007 - 01:06 pm
    Thanks, Scrawler. And Marni - I won't be breaking into your bookcase looking for your illustrated copy. I just ran a search and see that it is Jackie who has the illustrated edition. Lucky, lucky Jackie! Almost ready with the new home for this discussion. If only I had twenty minutes to claim as my own to get it done!

    Wainey
    February 27, 2007 - 01:36 am
    found my copy - Penguin Classic, translated & intro by Margaret R.B. Shaw - looking forward to re-reading it. still having computer trouble but hoping it keeps working!

    Traude S
    February 27, 2007 - 09:51 pm
    Have just caught up with the unread mails and am delighted that TR&TB was chosen. What joy !!! That's what I voted for, too.
    Yes, JOANP, ÉLOÏSE, I will be there.

    Have not decided on a specific translation, but would love to have the French text nearby. Will call Schoenhof's Foreign Language Books in Cambridge, Mass. first thing tomorrow.

    Joan Pearson
    February 27, 2007 - 10:08 pm
    Traudee...so happy to hear you will be joining us. I found a French etext - it's searchable too. It's in the discussion heading - which should go out tomorrow night. I think you'll like it.

    Now if only I could find a searchable etext in English! That comes in so handy when reading a long book. You don't have to page through looking for a certain passage! A prize for anyone who can find a searchable English translation!

    Éloïse De Pelteau
    February 28, 2007 - 04:14 am
    Traude, I am so happy that you will be joining us and JoanP

    HERE IS THE MONTCRIEFF TRANSLATION OF THE RED AND THE BLACK

    Joan Pearson
    February 28, 2007 - 06:07 am
    Thank you, Eloise - I do have that one in the new heading going up tonight - however, the prize is being offered to anyone who can find a Searchable English translation!

    Éloïse De Pelteau
    February 28, 2007 - 10:46 am
    I will look for the searchable translation JoanP. I didn't know that it could be done. Thanks.

    marni0308
    February 28, 2007 - 11:34 am
    JoanP: I finally an online copy of an English translation of The Red and the Black. It's in Project Gutenberg of Australia. There is a warning. It is still copyrighted in the U.S. and in some other countries. It is in the public domain of Australia.

    Here is the site of the online book translated by C. K. Scott Moncrieff [1889-1930]. It takes a moment to load.

    http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks03/0300261.txt

    Marni

    Joan Pearson
    February 28, 2007 - 05:21 pm
    Thanks, Marni - we've got Moncrieff - the prize waits for whomever can find a searchable translation. An invaluable tool. We DO have a searchable version in French though, ELoise - take a look -
    <b
    WE'VE GOT A NEW HOME !
    Please everyone - come up to our Open House - at Red and Black!

    Hors d' oeuvres and pinot blanc are being served!

    marni0308
    February 28, 2007 - 10:49 pm
    Oh, I was thinking, Joan, you'd use the Edit/Find button on the Menu bar to search the translation.

    Judy Shernock
    March 5, 2007 - 03:08 pm
    Hi- I had decided to join the discussion and went to the library to order a copy. San Jose has a million inhabitants, numerous libraries and NO COPY OF OUR BOOK! The librarian then went to San Jose State University with at least 20,000 students. Alas ,only one lone copy. It finally arrived at my branch library and lo and behold,It was an illustrated copy, translation by Moncrieff,circa 1926.

    It had last been borrowed in 1996.Sitting on the shelf for those years had turned the book into a crumbling disaster. I read the fine introduction by Hamilton Basso and then went out and bought a Barnes & Noble copy since the Moncrieff was too heavy to read in bed and the pieces of the cover kept crumbling. Also the smell was very bad.

    The modern version is what I will use for this discussion. I like to write on the margins of the books we discuss , so it is actually better for me to own the book.

    Judy . .

    MrsSherlock
    March 5, 2007 - 03:12 pm
    I just received my $1 copy of the Moncrief with the illustrations and the intro by Hamilton Basso. The book is in lovely condition except for some fading of the letters on the spine. The box has some fading around the edges like from sunlight. I'm so pleased with it.

    Joan Pearson
    March 5, 2007 - 04:15 pm
    You two make me green with envy. I want to see those illustrations - even if the book is smelly!

    Diana W
    March 20, 2007 - 07:30 pm
    I'm still new to SeniorNet and its book discussions. I'm looking for where to nominate books for future discussions and hope this is the right place. I love The Red and the Black, to be discussed next, but would like to nominate Moby Dick for the next one after the Stendal. It certainly qualifies as a "great book," perhaps the greatest novel written by an American. It is wonderful to read, but I've never had the chance to participate in a discussion of it. A discussion of something that rich in allegory and symbolism should be great fun, with all the differing possible "takes" on various parts of it!

    Diana

    JoanK
    March 21, 2007 - 02:41 am
    DIANA: wonderful idea! This is the place to suggest it. We'll take a vote before choosing the next one. But we only read one "great book" at a time, so it may be awhile.

    Joan Pearson
    March 21, 2007 - 05:40 am
    Thanks, Diana...will get the little nomination chart up and insert Moby. As I recall, he was nominated last time - usually the third time is a charm. We'll see what happens! As JoanK points out - we won't be voting again until we've finished The Red and the Black - which I'm really looking forward to. As I think about it - Red and Black won on its first appearance on the slate of nominations!

    MBolton
    April 25, 2007 - 08:16 pm
    I know many of you out there are Jane Austen fans. While Pride & Prejudice, Sense & Sensibility and Emma are the best known, Persuasion, is an incredibly lovely Austen novel, that combines her warmth and occasional sense of humor with a moving love story embedded in the social context of the times -- when both men and women were harmed by the tight strictures of society so that each gender has prescribed behaviors and constraints.

    Does anyone else have an interest in reading Persuasion? I'm new to this website and not sure how it works.

    Michele Bolton

    MrsSherlock
    April 26, 2007 - 07:05 am
    I'm always available for a discussion about any Jane Austen book. Persuasion is a lovely story. Emma is my favorite but I love them all and reread them periodically. Now's a good time to start the cycle again.

    hats
    April 27, 2007 - 03:29 am
    Welcome MBolton! You have come to a wonderful place. Enjoy.

    gumtree
    April 27, 2007 - 08:43 am
    MBolton Hello and welcome! I'm another 'Persuasion' fan and think it is Austen's best. If it is discussed here I'll be along to enjoy. In the meantime there is more than enough to keep us happy here on SN

    JoanK
    April 27, 2007 - 03:48 pm
    MBolton: (or do you want us to call you Michele?) WELCOME, WELCOME! What a great idea!! I've read all of Austin's books many times, but never had a chance to discuss them with a group.

    We did read a modern book, "The Jane Austen Book Club" here with the author, Karen Fowler, in the discussion. She said (I hope I'm remembering correctly) that she was interested in Austen because A was one of only a few authors who attracted such a loyal fan base, who are fascinated by the whole way of life she portrays. (There is a very active Jane Austen Society here in the US). She wondered what there is about Austen that does that.

    I'm such an "Austenophile" (spell checker is going to love that word!) that I even read her many imitators, such as the detective series by Stephanie Barron with Austen as the detective.

    Joan Pearson
    April 28, 2007 - 01:58 am
    Hello, Michele - I'd like to echo the others and WELCOME you here to our SeniorNet Book discussions.

    We're in the middle of Stendhal's The Red and the Black right now - will be reading/discussing it for another 6 weeks and then we'll VOTE on our next adventure.

    Would love to do Persuasion; will enter it into our nominations list in the header right now.

    Well do I remember our discussion of Karen Joy Fowler's Jane Austen Book Club, JoanK. Have you read that one, Michele? I remember during that month-long discussion of KJFowler's book, I read all six of Jane Austen's novels along with it.

    Welcome to SN, Michele. Make yourself right at home here.

    MrsSherlock
    April 28, 2007 - 06:03 am
    I decided to consult the lists referenced above and had three immediate hits: Huckleberry Finn, Darwins' Origin of the Species/Voyage of the Beagle, and the Koran. Finn because I can never get tired of Twain, Darwin (one word won't do), and the Koran, just because. I did say I was more than ready to read Austen, any Austen, so these come in seond. I've not read Darwin or the Koran.

    JoanK
    April 28, 2007 - 06:26 pm
    JACKIE: we have recently discussed Darwin.

    Joan Pearson
    April 28, 2007 - 06:46 pm
    Yes, Robby led a recent discussion of Origin - thanks, JoanK.
    The other two are excellent suggestions - I think this is the first time The Koran has been nominated, Twain a perennial favorite. I've entered them in the chart above. I see several spellings for Muhammad, Muhummed, etc. Please forgive me if I you don't approve of the one I selected...

    MrsSherlock
    April 28, 2007 - 08:40 pm
    Sorry I missed Darwin.

    Joan Pearson
    April 29, 2007 - 01:12 pm
    You might want to look into the Archived discussion when you get to reading it, Jackie. Some insightful comments from the participants should be helpful - Origin of the Species

    hats
    April 29, 2007 - 01:48 pm
    I would like to nominate Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison.

    Joan Pearson
    April 29, 2007 - 06:45 pm
    Hi there, hats -

    I agree Invisible Man would make a great book for discussion - but the criteria for these Great Books of the Western World discussions is that they withstand the test of time before getting named to the GB lists. Invisible Man won the National Book Award in the 50's when it was published, but has yet to make any of the Great Books lists you see in the header. We just had to draw the line somewhere and not make subjective decisions about which books will go down through the ages as timeless.

    But please - nominate the book for discussion in the Suggest a Book link in the header
    B&N Bookstore | Books Main Page | Suggest a Book for Discussion
    Do you see it?

    hats
    April 30, 2007 - 01:23 am
    JoanP, I did use the list in the header. I used Harold Bloom's The Western Canon. I scrolled down through the countries and came to the United States. You have to scroll through almost the whole list.

    It worked out. As always, it's hard for me to make up my mind. So, I have changed my mind about Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison. Instead, I have some other titles rolling around in my head. It's good I don't have to make a quick decision. Anyway, forget about my first choice. I have changed my mind. Thanks.

    Joan Pearson
    April 30, 2007 - 05:03 am
    Hats, I completely forgot about Harold Bloom's more up to date list! I guess 50+ years is enough time to test a book's longevity isn't it? Are you sure you want to take it out of consideration?

    hats
    April 30, 2007 - 05:18 am
    I am very sure. Everything worked out perfectly. I had forgotten we have a lot of time to think about nominations.

    MrsSherlock
    April 30, 2007 - 05:47 am
    Invisible Man was an extremely painful book to read. Hats, be sure to nominate it.

    JoanK
    May 1, 2007 - 03:30 pm
    I have seen "Invisible Man" on several Great Books lists. It's certainly a great book, IMO. But it is painful, and cuts close to the bone. Maybe we're not ready for it.

    hats
    May 2, 2007 - 02:15 am
    I would like to read Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison on my own first. I think some books call for that one on one experience first. It is a book where I would like to search my soul. I would like to listen closely to the words because I have sons and grandsons.

    Joan Pearson
    May 2, 2007 - 04:12 am
    Sounds like a good idea, Hats. Maybe you could give us a review when you have finished.
    Some time soon we will be opening a new Great Books Upcoming discussion as we are nearing the 1000 post mark. Will put a link to this one in the heading of the new discussion though.

    jane
    May 3, 2007 - 03:05 pm
    It's time to move to a new discussion area...

    "---Great Books Upcoming - What Next? Suggestions here... NEW"